TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge

Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge

Jim Rusling (
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:56:25 -0500

DLR <> wrote:

> Steve Sobol wrote:

>> Anthony Bellanga wrote:

>>> Over the years, various miscellaneous entities (I assume Cellular One)
>>> were taken over by SBC Mobility, or BellSouth Mobility, or post-2000
>>> by Cingular.

> So what the heck is SunComm? It appears to be a part of the old AT&T
> wireless but I don't get what made some of AT&T become SC and some
> become Cingular.

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I think it was a legal thing. For
> example, in part of Oklahoma (Okla City, perhaps?) wasn't Cingular
> Wireless required to divest itself of some customers in the
> purchase of AT&T and those (divested) customers were handed over to
> Alltel? I know there was much customer confusion over it. PAT]

Yes they were in Oklahoma City.

Jim Rusling
More or Less Retired
Mustang, OK

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Rick Merrill: "Re: A Tale of Two Scott Calverts and the Internet"
Go to Previous message: John Levine: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
Next in thread: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page