TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge

Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge

John Levine (johnl@iecc.com)
7 Aug 2006 21:31:56 -0000

>>> Over the years, various miscellaneous entities (I assume Cellular One)
>>> were taken over by SBC Mobility, or BellSouth Mobility, or post-2000
>>> by Cingular.

> So what the heck is SunComm? It appears to be a part of the old AT&T
> wireless but I don't get what made some of AT&T become SC and some
> become Cingular.

Every time there's a cellular merger, there's always a few places
where the two merging parties compete head to head, so they have to
divest one of two systems to someone else.

R's,

John

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Jim Rusling: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
Go to Previous message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: The Hive / Can Thousands of Wikipedians be Wrong?"
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
Next in thread: Jim Rusling: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page