| Re: Cost of POTS w/o Long Distance | 
|---|
 Tony P. (nospam.kd1s@cox.nospam.net)Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:09:49 -0500 
  | 
  | 
| 
In article <telecom25.11.8@telecom-digest.org>, richgr@panix.com says... 
 
> In article <telecom25.10.3@telecom-digest.org>, John Stahl 
 
>> If one calls the Verizon business office the charge is now 
 
> This actually makes sense.  If you call the office, a human droid must 
 
> If you do it online, it gets done "untouched by human hands" and costs 
 
Do you mean to tell me that when I had Verizon I could turn features 
 
That isn't the Verizon that I know. For example -- on the 
 
That might be why the average cost of a line in this area is $35 a   | 
| Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply | 
| Go to Next message: Phil Earnhardt: "Re: Public Wants Court to Okay Wiretaps" | |
| Go to Previous message: Ken Abrams: "Re: Cost of POTS, w/o Long Distance" | |
| May be in reply to: Bob Alan: "Cost of POTS w/o Long Distance" | |
| Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Cost of POTS w/o Long Distance" | |
| TELECOM Digest: Home Page | |