by Robert Scheer, the Associated Press
On Thursday, an estimated $40 million worth of inaugural pomp and
circumstance will only temporarily triumph over an incalculable record
of deceit and error.
Of course, some might say it's tacky to rain on the President's
parade, but two crucial news stories compel it.
First came the report, confirmed by the White House, that the
fruitless search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq had
officially but secretly ended shortly before Christmas without, of
course, any sign of the much discussed weapons that were such a
critical justification for the war in the first place. This was
followed by the astounding claim by the President that his narrow
election victory in November absolved him of accountability for both
the false rationales and outright lies used to justify the invasion,
and the disastrous occupation that followed.
"Well, we had an accountability moment, and that's called the 2004
elections," Bush told the Washington Post in an interview published
Friday. "And the American people listened to different assessments
made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked at the two
candidates, and chose me."
Actually, the election provided no such moment of accountability
because both major-party candidates had supported the war. John Kerry
had voted to authorize the use of force against Iraq -- and then
inexplicably said on the campaign trail that he would have voted the
same way even after learning that Congress and the American public had
been deceived -- lied to -- on the war's justification. The Democratic
Party nominee even endorsed larger troop commitments to occupy a
country where every Western soldier on the ground fuels nationalist
and religious rage.
And although it is true that Bush secured a (very slim) majority of
the popular vote, it is a portent of how history will judge him that
the days ahead of his inauguration have been soured by a string of
critical statements about his Iraq policy from some of the biggest
Iraq hands in the Republican ranks.
Brent Scowcroft, the retired lieutenant general who was national
security advisor to the President's father during the first Iraq war,
warned ominously that the upcoming Iraqi national elections "won't be
a promising transformation, and it has great potential for deepening
the conflict. We may be seeing incipient civil war at this time."
Even the Bush family's consigliore is concerned enough to speak out
publicly. James A. Baker III, the former secretary of State who has
been working at Bush's behest to win international debt relief for
conquered Iraq, is talking publicly about the need for a phased
withdrawal: "Any appearance of a permanent occupation will both
undermine domestic support here in the United States and play directly
into the hands of those in the Middle East who -- however
wrongly -- suspect us of imperial design."
Undaunted by such pragmatism, President "Mission Accomplished" Bush
twice demurred in his interview with the Post from Colin
Powell's prediction that US troops would begin leaving Iraq in the
next year.
Despite what Bush may think, elections grant leaders temporary power,
but it is history that determines the rightness and wrongness of their
actions. As Abraham Lincoln noted, you can even fool all of the people
some of the time. That is why the nation's founders designed the
Constitution to check the unbridled rule of the majority lest, driven
by the passions of the moment, it embrace devastating error or even
tyranny.
Consider that even without the debacle of Watergate, the reputation of
the man who soundly defeated war hero and antiwar candidate George
McGovern was ultimately doomed by his immoral and irrational decision
to carpet-bomb most of Southeast Asia for years in a vain attempt to
secure victory against a seemingly outmatched Third World country.
As we honor Medal of Freedom winner Martin Luther King Jr., a prophet
of peace, it is depressing to consider that our President has just
bestowed that same medal -- the highest civilian honor in the land --
on ex-CIA Director George Tenet and ex-Iraqi administrator L. Paul
Bremer III.
After all, it was Tenet who kept Congress in the dark about the
agency's considerable intelligence that contradicted the White House
lies about Iraq's alleged nuclear weapons program and ties to Al
Qaeda. And it was the bumbling Bremer who assured us throughout his
stay in Iraq that everything over there was just going swimmingly --
instead of admitting that it was actually going to hell in a handbasket.
No matter his electoral victory, Bush will never be absolved of
sending young people to kill and be killed in a war without moral
justification.
One does not have to be a Catholic to agree with the pope that the
invasion of Iraq fails to meet the Christian standard of a "just war",
or anything close to being a 'Christian' as the President claims he is.
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, the Associated Press Syndicate.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Lisa Minter (lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com)