TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Countering the "Lingo Sucks" Thread

Re: Countering the "Lingo Sucks" Thread

Hank Karl (
Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:32:29 -0500

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:55:46 -0500 (EST), Dan Lanciani <>

> (Ted Koppel) wrote:

>> If you're going to complain about Lingo, at least do it for real reasons:

>> - still not sending callerID *name* (although they are sending number)
>> on outgoing calls

> So what does it mean to send callerID name on outgoing calls? I was
> under the (mis?)impression that calling name presentation was normally
> implemented by the terminating switch doing a database dip using the
> SS7-passed calling number. I heard some talk of an end-to-end
> version, but I thought it wasn't generally supported.

There is a way to send end-to-end caller ID Name (on NI-x PRI as well
as SS7). As far as I know, its supported, and is starting to be used,
but its not used as much as database dips.

> Dan Lanciani
> ddl@danlan.*com

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: John Levine: "Re: Lingo Voip isn't really cheap"
Go to Previous message: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: Countering the "Lingo Sucks" Thread"
May be in reply to: Ted Koppel: "Countering the "Lingo Sucks" Thread"
Next in thread: No Spam: "CallerID Name was Re: Countering the "Lingo Sucks" Thread"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page