TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Speed 8 and Speed 30 (re: ESS Feature Usage)

Speed 8 and Speed 30 (re: ESS Feature Usage)

Anthony Bellanga (anthonybellanga@notchur.biz)
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:33:04 -0600

********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.
********************************************************************

Patrick Townson asked:

> At one point, Bell was offering 'Speed Dial-8' _and 'Speed Dial-32'.

Most BOCs and LECs in the US and Canada still do offer Speed-8 and
Speed-30. It is/was NOT speed-32.

> 8 required "#" plus a single digit 2-9, while 32 required '#" plus 2
> digits 21 through 60, with a few number combos not used.

NO, you've reversed it for both.

Speed-8 is used by dialing any single "N" digit 2-thru-9, pre-
programmed with a specific full telephone number, and then either
waiting for a 3-to-5 second post-dial-delay time-out, or if using
DTMF, keying the '#' (pound) button AFTER the single "N" digit.

Speed-30 is used by dialing any two-digit code from 20 through 49,
pre-programmed with a specific full telephone number, and then either
waiting for the post-dial-delay time-out, or touch-tone keying the '#'
button AFTER the two-digit code was entered.

To take advantage of the trailing '#' (POUND) button, you had to be
a "subscribed" touchtone customer, though.

There were some Centrex and PBX systems, and even some specialty
"package" deals for single and small multi-line groups where the
speed-dialing or "rapid-dial" feature did (does) use a '#' (pound)
BEFORE the one/two digit speed dial code, but those are only exceptions.

The common practice was (still is) 'N'(#) with Speed-8, and 'NX'(#)
for Speed-30; where 'N' by itself is any digit 2 through 9, and 'NX'
is a two-digit code from 20 through 49.

> I do not think they ever promoted 'Speed Dial-32' all that much.

My observation is that many BOCs and LECs are trying to eliminate or
reduce promotions for Speed-8. Since you can get over three-times as
many central-office memory slots with Speed-30, and telco can charge
more as well, most telcos would prefer the customer to get "30" over
"8". Most (though not necessarily all) BOCs and LECs can easily offer
a single customer BOTH Speed-8 AND Speed-30 on the same line. There's
no network or switch programming conflict with having both on the same
line!

> You can still get speed dial for your cell phone, although with all
> the ways of saving numbers on your cell phone, I cannot see why
> anyone would need it as a _network_ feature as well.

I can't see anyone getting or using "Speed-8/30" as such on a
cellphone (although I think it is possible, although necessariy 8 or
30 coded entries -- even those PBX and Centrex, and single/multi-line
packaged features described above don't necessarily use the 8/30
"convention"), since as you mention that you can do all kinds of
things to save dialed numbers in a cellphone, i.e., the cellphone's
own personal directory.

And these days, modern landline phones have memory slots and "hot"
buttons, etc. But if you have several phones at home all on the same
line that are "plain Jane" Western Electric 500 or 2500 sets, telco
switch-based Speed-8 or 30 can be an attractive option. And ALL phones
will use the same coded "line-up", rather than having several
individual phones to program, and try to program all of them
identically.

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"
Go to Previous message: USTelecom dailyLead: "Spectrum Auction Set For Today"
Next in thread: Mr Joseph Singer: "Re: Speed 8 and Speed 30 (re: ESS Feature Usage)"
May be reply: Mr Joseph Singer: "Re: Speed 8 and Speed 30 (re: ESS Feature Usage)"
May be reply: Sam Spade: "Re: Speed 8 and Speed 30 (re: ESS Feature Usage)"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page