jtaylor (jtaylor@deletethis.hfx.andara.com) Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:05:14 -0300

Review Index Sorted By: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: B. Wright: "Re: Future 911/Technology is Changing so Quickly That Emergency" Previous message: Sam Spade: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns" May be in reply to: fake.e-mail@stonyx.com: "2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns" Next in thread: DLR: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns" TELECOM Digest: Home Page

<fake.e-mail@stonyx.com> wrote in message news:telecom25.276.11@telecom-digest.org: > Is there any information out there that would indicate which is > safer/healthier to use ... a 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz cordless phone? > I'm not trying to get into a discussion of whether cordless phones > actually pose a real health hazard, however, I would like to know > which of the two is considered less harmfull ... 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz > radio waves. If they do not pose a real hazard, your question is moot.

Post Followup Article	Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: B. Wright: "Re: Future 911/Technology is Changing so Quickly That Emergency"
Go to Previous message: Sam Spade: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be in reply to: fake.e-mail@stonyx.com: "2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
Next in thread: DLR: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page