TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns

2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns

fake.e-mail@stonyx.com
27 Jul 2006 08:22:38 -0700

Is there any information out there that would indicate which is
safer/healthier to use ... a 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz cordless phone?

I'm not trying to get into a discussion of whether cordless phones
actually pose a real health hazard, however, I would like to know
which of the two is considered less harmfull ... 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz
radio waves.

Thanks,

Harry

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Danny Burstein: "Re: The Great [sic] Queens Blackout Continues; No Relief in Sight"
Go to Previous message: USTelecom dailyLead: "Broadband Subs Rise, DSL Outpaces Cable"
Next in thread: DLR: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: DLR: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: Sam Spade: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: jtaylor: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: DLR: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: Rick Merrill: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
May be reply: Scott Dorsey: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page