|Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns|
Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:02:14 -0400
> Is there any information out there that would indicate which is
> I'm not trying to get into a discussion of whether cordless phones
We all want simple answers to complicated issues.
Harmful to what in what way?
There are a LOT of variables in play. Older phones tend to have higher
Are you worried about brain cancer, skin cancer, or something else?
To be honest I doubt you can come up with a clear choice just based on
For me, I'd buy 5.8 as that is less likely to interfere with wireless
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Sam Spade: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"|
|Go to Previous message: Steve Sobol: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"|
|May be in reply to: firstname.lastname@example.org: "2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"|
|Next in thread: Sam Spade: "Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|