Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead |
---|
Thor Lancelot Simon (tls@panix.com) Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
|
|
In article <telecom25.263.9@telecom-digest.org>, Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com> wrote:
> Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>> In article <telecom25.261.8@telecom-digest.org>,
>>> I suspect from the way current VoIP calls are structured that it would be
>> This is all false. Why do we have this same discussion over and over
> Well, you don't say where you think you got your information.
I got it from 10 years of design and analysis experience with the
As all the interworking standards make clear, any interworking to a
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: telecomdirect_daily: "TelecomDirect News Daily Update - July 17, 2006" | |
Go to Previous message: JE Durbin: "Re: Microsoft Kills Off 'My Private Folder' Application" | |
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead" | |
Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |