Re: Bell Divestiture |
---|
Tony P. (kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net) Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:38:50 -0400
|
|
In article <telecom24.283.7@telecom-digest.org>, Wesrock@aol.com says:
> In a message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:07:05 -0000,
>> Repeating for the illiterate:
>> 'native' touch-tone operation was substantially cheaper for the telco
>> They retrofitted dial-to-pulse conversion on SxS switches so that they
>> This was a "short-term" expenditure of money now, to maximize
> What was the cost of the touch-tone oscillator for a telephone set,
Considering that a rotary dial was nothing but springs and gears,
But the basics of the phone were just a 500 set with updated housing.
But then I stop and think how much effort went into making reliable |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Bell Divestiture" | |
Go to Previous message: jmeissen@aracnet.com: "Re: NFL in Talks With Sprint, Others for Wireless Video" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |