http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0506/p01s04-usgn.html
By: Peter Grier Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
(WASHINGTON)From driver's licenses, to passports, to plane tickets,
the paperwork necessary to enter and move about America may soon be
subject to more restrictive rules -- all in the name of homeland
security.
In some cases (licenses) the paperwork may be difficult to get. In
others (passports) it may have to be proffered more often. These
changes, added together, may have the biggest effect on Americans'
routines of any made for security's sake since the immediate aftermath
of Sept. 11, 2001.
Some analysts say that the changes are more oriented toward
controlling illegal immigration than fighting terrorism. Others argue
that those two efforts are inextricably linked -- and that the US has
to start somewhere, given the number of undocumented people that cross
the nation's borders every year.
"Unless we discourage people from entering the US, our border security
problem is unsolvable," says James Jay Carafano, senior fellow for
national security and homeland security at the Heritage Foundation.
The prospective change that may affect the most people is probably the
move to make it more difficult to obtain driver's licenses.
Historically, the rules and regulations surrounding driver
registration have been left to the states, which issue some 70 million
licenses a year. Today, getting one usually requires simply proof of
age, plus a few other basic forms of ID.
Under the terms of the Real ID Act, currently attached to the $81
million emergency spending plan for Iraq and Afghanistan, applicants
for driver licenses would be required to prove that they are in the
country legally. They would also have to provide a valid Social
Security number, home address, and photo identification.
The Real ID measure was attached to the supplemental spending bill
only after weeks of wrangling between House and Senate negotiators. It
could clear both chambers as early as next week.
Not that this tightening is uncontroversial. Far from it -- it has
been decried as everything from a back-door attempt to establish a
national ID card, to a method of making US roads less safe, via
forcing undocumented workers further underground.
It is much more an anti-immigrant move than an antiterrorism one,
according to Juliette Kayyem, a security expert at Harvard's John F.
Kennedy School of Government.
Some of the Sept. 11 hijackers would still have qualified for licenses
under this new rule, Ms. Kayyem points out. There are other homeland
security changes she would set as having higher priority -- such as
getting the FBI a computer system that works.
"In an ideal world, in which information flowed smoothly, I guess the
[licensing change] could have some effect," says Kayyem.
But the driver's licenses might not be the only thing that will soon
take more documents to obtain. The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has announced that it will require airlines to
ask for passengers' full names and birth dates when selling tickets.
Ticket-buyers won't actually be required to provide this information.
But if they don't, there will be a much better chance of their being
pulled aside for extra security checks before being allowed to board.
The change should help keep people from being confused with others who
have the same or a similar name and are on terrorist watch lists, said
TSA officials. It will also help them implement Secure Flight, a
computerized passenger screening program set to enter tests this
August.
In addition to all this, new rules proposed by the State Department
and the Department of Homeland Security would eventually require
Americans returning from nearby destinations, such as Canada, Mexico,
and the Caribbean, to proffer their passports upon reentry. Previously,
returning from these destinations did not require such documentation.
Under the rules -- which are now in a comment phase, and have yet to
be adopted -- US travelers coming from the Caribbean and Panama would
need passports beginning next January 1. A similar requirement for
return from Canada and Mexico would be phased in over subsequent
years.
Cruise lines and other modes of travel to the popular warm islands
just south of the US are particularly unhappy about this prospective
change.
In some ways, the total effect of all this tightening is beside the
point, argues Mr. Carafano of the Heritage Foundation.
Requiring ID to get a driver's license might not by itself snag the
next Mohammed Atta. But it is a step the US has to take as it moves
inevitably toward keeping greater track of who is in the country.
"Is digging a hole in the ground going to give you a home to live in?
No," says Carafano. "But you have to dig a hole to lay the foundation."
Among other changes he would recommend is establishment of a simple
method for employers to check whether potential employees have a right
to work in the US.
Kayyem of the JFK School, for her part, thinks making sure police and
fire departments across the nation can talk to each other should be a
high priority homeland security change. The method for distributing
federal homeland security dollars should also do a better job of
steering money where it's truly needed, she says.
(c) Copyright 2005 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
Click here to order a free sample copy of the print edition of the
Monitor: http://www.csmonitor.com/aboutus/sample_issue.html
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. Read lots of newpapers online, no registration and no
login requirements, little advertising.
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nytimes.html . Discuss today's
telecom and general news at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/chatpage.html
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, The Christian Science Publishing Society.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Lisa Minter (lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com)