Re: More 'Tweens' Going Mobile; Long-Term Health Risks Unclear |
---|
Tony P. (kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net) Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:14:09 -0500
|
|
In article <telecom24.128.1@telecom-digest.org>, monty@roscom.com says:
> By Associated Press | March 21, 2005
> CHICAGO -- There were two things 11-year-old Patty Wiegner really,
I'm not sure what I'd be more concerned about. Should it be the RF
In article <telecom24.130.9@telecom-digest.org>, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
> Monty Solomon wrote:
>> By Associated Press | March 21, 2005
>> CHICAGO -- There were two things 11-year-old Patty Wiegner really,
> My initial knee-jerk reaction would be to object to kids having cell
> However, this was when I was in high school, not elementary school.
> I'm not so thrilled about the idea of "tweens" or younger kids having
> Of course, these days kids are far more isolated than we were. We
That is what we get for fleeing the urban core cities. The costs of that
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: There are lots of things wrong with the |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Tony P.: "Re: Cell Phone Jammer For Sale MONIX MGB-1S" | |
Go to Previous message: Tony P.: "Re: New Long Range Cordless Phones" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |