Re: Voom Goes Boom |
---|
J Kelly (jkelly@newsguy.com) Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:15:10 -0600
|
|
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:35:57 -0800, Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, J Kelly wrote:
>> I keep hearing a vocal minority whining about not enough HDTV
> Voom's service started out with a hefty (several hundred dollars)
> Voom did not carry any local channels; you had to have a separate OTA
> Voom didn't carry very many of the popular cable/satellite channels.
> Voom was not a good choice for people with multiple sets, or for people
> When Voom cut their prices, they did so to the extent that clearly
> Bottom line: high prices, inferior choices compared to other satellite
> -- Mark --
> http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
I figured from day one they would go bust. Now there is a big fight |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Dan Lanciani: "Re: Is Your Identity Safe?" | |
Go to Previous message: Robert Cabule: "International DID's" | |
May be in reply to: J Kelly: "Voom Goes Boom" | |
Next in thread: Steve Sobol: "Re: Voom Goes Boom" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |