TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective

Re: Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective

Rich Greenberg (richgr@panix.com)
24 Jan 2005 16:56:57 -0500

In article <telecom24.32.9@telecom-digest.org>, Justin Time
<a_user2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

> programs the fix is for, well, it's absolutely stupid. Oh, the site
> refers you to a KBxxxxxx but doesn't tell you what a KB is.

Thats a reference to a Knowledge Base article, which will have more
details than you wanted to know. Just go to the M$ site and enter the
xxxxxx in the search window and GO.

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Under the *assumption* that Microsoft
> probably knows best from a technical standpoint, I download every one
> of the patches as soon as one of my computers tells me I should do
> so. I do not think I have ever missed downloading a single patch, even
> some that later had to be repaired by other patches. PAT]

I pretty much do the same. The key word in Pat's remarks is "probably".

Rich Greenberg Marietta, GA, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red & Shasta (RIP),Red, husky Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Dave Garland: "Re: Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective"
Go to Previous message: jmeissen@aracnet.com: "Re: Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective"
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective"
Next in thread: Dave Garland: "Re: Review: Microsoft Anti-Spyware Ineffective"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page