| Re: Trial Shows How Spammers Operate | 
|---|
|  Robert Bonomi (bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com) Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:14:52 +0000 
 | 
| 
 | 
| In article <telecom23.559.11@telecom-digest.org>, Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com> wrote: 
> Obviously.  But why should I care?  The point of the response is to 
Suppose *your* email address got forged as the sender on spam that 
Guess what happens to _your_ mailbox. 
But, "why should those people care?"  *You* don't care about being 
If all the spam had *invalid* addresses addresses, it wouldn't be an 
You *are* spamming _their_ mailbox. 
>> Occasionally I see messages like that and they are treated 
> That works only if you have time to look at all the messages.  I 
>> Since spammers never use a real From: address replying by mail is 
> It is extremely useful for my purposes; it just may not happen to also 
Yeah.  you mail-bomb *innocent* parties who's address was used 
> My machine doesn't look like a relay and they are not trying to use it 
It's called a 'dictionary' attack.  Just one more way of trying to | 
| Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply | 
| Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Movie Studios to Sue Internet File Traders" | |
| Go to Previous message: Joseph: "Re: Couple of Basic Cellular Questions" | |
| May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Trial Shows How Spammers Operate" | |
| Next in thread: Dan Lanciani: "Re: Trial Shows How Spammers Operate" | |
| TELECOM Digest: Home Page | |