Re: Pennsylvania Victims Group |
---|
Michael D. Sullivan (nospam@camsul.com) Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:23:15 GMT
|
|
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Alecia, before you attempt to re-invent > the wheel on this, you may want to check into federal actions in > recent days on Norvergence. The Federal Trade Commission has already, > not long ago, declared that Norvergence was a total fraud (and a very > good one, I might add), and they have declared that the leasing things > that companies like yours signed were equally fraudulent documents. > Some have suggested that the leasing companies were at best, very > casual and careless in agreeing to accept the lease assignments, as > 'holders in due course' and at worst, complicit in the fraud. Use our > web site http://telecom-digest.org to search for Norvergence in our > archives for all you would ever want to know about that bunch of > charlatans. As I understand it, essentially no one these days is > paying on that lease arrangement, no matter how it was phrased, nor > no matter how aggresive the banks and finance companies have gotten, > and the more agressive of the 'debtors' (who were defrauded as you > apparently have been) have begun looking into ways to force the > return of the money they already paid under duress from collectors, > etc. Read the last two months or so of this digest at our web site > for more details before you try to organize people in Pennsylvania > at some expense to yourself, etc. PAT]
Pat, the FTC hasn't "declared" anything. It has voted to file, and
Michael D. Sullivan
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Mr. Sullivan, I thought the rulings of |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Steve Crow: "Re: 'K' v. 'W' Television Station Callsigns" | |
Go to Previous message: Tony P.: "Re: My Vonage Experience So Far" | |
May be in reply to: Alecia: "Pennsylvania Victims Group" | |
Next in thread: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Pennsylvania Victims Group" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |