38 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Copyright © 2019 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved.

The Telecom Digest for Fri, 20 Sep 2019
Volume 38 : Issue 263 : "text" format

Table of contents
AT&T Says Customers Can't Sue the Company for Selling Location Data to Bounty HuntersBill Horne
Verizon Makes SIM Swapping Hard. Why Doesn't AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile?Bill Horne
NLRB Judge Calls Foul On AT&T Unit's Union Button BanBill Horne
Please send posts to telecom-digest.org, with userid set to telecomdigestsubmissions, or via Usenet to comp.dcom.telecom
The Telecom Digest is made possible by generous supporters like the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) at M.I.T.
If you reply to a post in this issue, please change the subject line to the actual subject of the post, and include the "Message-ID" and other headers that appear above the post.  Thank you!
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-ID: <20190919160628.GA13437@telecom.csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:06:28 +0000 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> Subject: AT&T Says Customers Can't Sue the Company for Selling Location Data to Bounty Hunters Due to the contract fine print, AT&T says customers must instead deal with the company privately rather than in court. By Joseph Cox AT&T is arguing that its customers can't sue the company for selling location data to bounty hunters, according to recently filed court records. AT&T says the customers signed contracts that force them into arbitration, meaning consumers have to settle complaints privately with the company rather than in court. The filing is in response to a lawsuit filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ne83b7/att-says-cant-sue-class-action-lawsuit-arbitration-selling-location-data-to-bounty-hunters -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly) ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20190919161730.GA13674@telecom.csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:17:31 +0000 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> Subject: Verizon Makes SIM Swapping Hard. Why Doesn't AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile? Verizon employs different security procedures when porting a phone number to a different SIM card than the other carriers. This is making SIM swapping attacks harder to perform against Verizon customers. By Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai Last week, we revealed the existence of a little known feature that could make T-Mobile customers a bit more secure against the rising fraud known as SIM swapping. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/kz438w/verizon-makes-sim-swapping-hard-why-doesnt-atandt-sprint-and-t-mobile -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly) ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20190919161415.GA13487@telecom.csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:14:15 +0000 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> Subject: NLRB Judge Calls Foul On AT&T Unit's Union Button Ban An AT&T unit violated federal labor law by maintaining guidelines that prohibited wearing union buttons on work apparel and then stopping workers from sporting the buttons during contract negotiations, a National Labor Relations Board judge has held. NLRB Administrative Law Judge Michael A. Rosas said in his decision Tuesday that Indiana Bell Telephone Co. Inc. had the burden of showing that there were special circumstances that justified maintaining guidelines that limited certain technicians' rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act to wear union insignia. https://www.law360.com/telecom/articles/1200271/nlrb-judge-calls-foul-on-at-t-unit-s-union-button-ban -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly) ------------------------------ ********************************************* End of telecom Digest Fri, 20 Sep 2019

Telecom Digest Archives

The Telecom Digest FAQ