32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Previous Issue (Only one)
The Telecom Digest for May 12, 2014
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 20:06:24 -0700 (PDT) From: HAncock4 <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: history of telephone sets Message-ID: <email@example.com> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 3:44:00 PM UTC-4, news wrote: > > http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/STARS:Telephones > Interesting article, thanks for posting it. A side note about the model 302 set. When the 500 set came out in the early 1950s, the Bell System found itself with an idle inventory of perfectly good 302 sets. Customers wanted the more modern set. To utilize them, they created a case that looked like the newer 500 set, but was actually a 302 set, and installed them in service. But plenty of regular 302 sets (and the wall version, 354), remained in service through the 1960s. Also, the "F" handset of the 302 set was often used to replace the E handset on the older 202 sets. The F handset offered superior sound quality. The sound quality of a 302 set in good condition is almost as good as that of a 500 set. However, the heavy handset is tiring to hold in a long conversation, and the ringer, while pleasant, was fixed in a loud position (the 500 set ringer is adjustable). A 302 will work on a regular landline today. But I wonder how long exchanges will continue to accept rotary-pulse dialed calls. In a recent high-fashion ad series by a Manhasset, NY upscale mall, lines such as Tiffany and Jimmy Choo had a 302 set as part of the photograph. In one, a model wearing a Tiffany bracelet is placing a call on a 302 set.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.