32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Previous Issue (Only one)

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for May 5, 2014
Volume 33 : Issue 74 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
FT systems (David Lesher)
In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley (Monty Solomon)

====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 01:25:38 +0000 (UTC) From: David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: FT systems Message-ID: <lk6pai$72h$1@reader1.panix.com> I'm seeking data on early AT&T fiber systems aka Lightwave. I know FT3 was 90.524 Mbps, and needed regenerators every 4-5 miles. I'm interested in a FT7 installation, circa 1987. How frequently would it have needed regenerators, and what kind of bit rates would it have had? Further, was FT3 multimode glass usable on FT7? I can't find much on the fiber used; and wonder how long it was usable with upgraded equipment. When did the OC hierarchy take over? -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 17:08:56 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley Message-ID: <p0624080bcf8c5c7a7cec@[]> In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley By DAVID E. SANGER MAY 2, 2014 WASHINGTON - Nearly a year after the first disclosures about the National Security Agency's surveillance practices at home and abroad, the agency is emerging with mandates to make only modest changes: some new limits on what kind of data about Americans it can hold, and White House oversight of which foreign leaders' cellphones it can tap and when it can conduct cyberoperations against adversaries. The big question now is whether Silicon Valley will get off as easily. It was the subject of a new White House report about how technology and the crunching of big data about the lives of Americans - from which websites they visit to where they drive their newly networked cars - are enlarging the problem. At their core, the questions about the N.S.A. are strikingly similar to those about how Google, Yahoo, Facebook and thousands of application makers crunch their numbers. The difference is over the question of how far the government will go to restrain the growth of its own post-Sept. 11 abilities, and whether it will decide the time has come to intrude on what private industry collects, in the name of protecting privacy or preventing new forms of discrimination. President Obama alluded to that at the White House on Friday, when he was forced to take up the issue at a news conference with one of the N.S.A.'s most prominent targets: Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, who said she was still not satisfied with America's responses to the revelations that her phone - and her country - were under blanket surveillance for a dozen years. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/03/us/politics/white-house-shifts-surveillance-debate-to-private-sector.html
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org

Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (2 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues