32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Previous Issue (Only one)
The Telecom Digest for April 16, 2014
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Viacom-NCTC programming deal rejected by community-owned operator MPW Message-ID: <email@example.com> By Jim Barthold, FierceCable, April 15, 2014 | Muscatine Power and Water, a local utility and digital cable TV | provider in Iowa, has decided it would rather switch off than fight | when it comes to the newly negotiated program carriage agreement | between the National Cable Television Cooperative (NCTC) and | Viacom. Multiple NTSC members, including one of the largest, Cable | One, have also rejected the agreement. | | In a press release, MPW said customer-owners voted 4-1 for MPW | DigitalTV to decline the agreement struck by its purchasing | cooperative. It has thus removed Viacom channels like Comedy | Central, MTV and Nickelodeon from its lineup. | | "It's a tough call, but it speaks to our view that the cable TV | industry has to stand up to the outrageous demands of programmers," | Sal LoBianco, MPW's general manager said in a press release. "As a | community-owned communications utility, our motivation is to | protect our customers--our neighbors--from significant fee | increases wherever possible." Continued: http://www.fiercecable.com/story/viacom-nctc-programming-deal-rejected-community-owned-operator-mpw/2014-04-15?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal -or- http://tinyurl.com/qxsfbdv Maybe for-profit cable companies should do the same thing. NCTC is a not-for-profit corporation serving the interests of over 950 cable operators like MPW Digital TV across the United States . It has a combined customer base of over 5,000,000 cable TV subscribers. Among its many services, NCTC negotiates many network agreements on behalf of its member companies. Programmers gain the efficiency of negotiating one contract . NCTC bring s to bear the negotiating power of 950 + member cable operators to help keep costs down from the large programmer corporations Neal McLain
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) From: HAncock4 <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: LA Times: Price gouging for unlisted phone numbers Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> An article in the Los Angeles Times talks about the fees charged by carriers to have an unlisted number. In January, AT&T raised it fee from $1.25 to $1.75, a 40% increase. In 2006 it was only 28 cents. The author attempted to obtain Verizon's fee, but was given multiple quotes by different people ranging from $2.25 to $8.50 per month, with FIOS costing more. "They emphasize that this is for a service that a phone company is not providing. It's for them not including your name in a directory and not facing the costs of printing it in a phone book. "It's pure gravy," said Natalie Billingsley, telecom supervisor for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, an arm of the California Public Utilities Commission. "They charge whatever they want to charge." " full detailed article at: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20140415,0,2408533.column#axzz2yz2KMggk P.S. Years ago the carriers claimed the fee was necessary to offset calls to directory assistance in search of unlisted numbers. But today DA calls are expensive, often $1 each.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.