32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for February 15, 2014
Volume 33 : Issue 29 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Reports: Comcast to acquire Time Warner Cable for $44B (Neal McLain)
Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen (David Clayton)
Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen (Barry Margolin)
Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen (David Clayton)

====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:23:48 -0800 (PST) From: Neal McLain <nmclain.remove-this@and-this-too.annsgarden.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Reports: Comcast to acquire Time Warner Cable for $44B Message-ID: <72efedcf-4164-4da4-849e-dc52b38480e7@googlegroups.com> By Steve Donohue, FierceCable, February 12, 2014 | Comcast plans to announce that it has struck a deal with Time | Warner Cable to acquire the nation's second largest cable MSO for | $44 billion in stock, CNBC and other media outlets reported. | | The companies plan to officially announce the news Thursday | morning, according to reports. | | News of the agreement, which would see Comcast acquire TWC for | about $159 per share, came one day after Charter Communications | announced that it would nominate 13 directors for TWC's board of | directors in an attempt to execute a hostile takeover of TWC. | Charter offered to acquire TWC for $132.50 per share last month. | | A combined Comcast-TWC would create a cable MSO with 33 million | subscribers, counting 13 million more video subscribers than | DirecTV, which ended third quarter with around 20 million U.S. | subscribers. Continued: http://www.fiercecable.com/story/reports-comcast-acquire-time-warner-cable-44b/2014-02-12?spMailingID=8268228&spUserID=NTcyNDYxMTE2NDAS1&spJobID=204843164&spReportId=MjA0ODQzMTY0S0 -or- http://tinyurl.com/kknpvg5 Neal McLain
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:29:13 +1100 From: David Clayton <dc33box-usenet2@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen Message-ID: <pan.2014.02.12.22.29.10.219578@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:00:11 -0500, Monty Solomon wrote: > Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen > > By NOAM COHEN > FEB. 9, 2014 > > The Internet behemoths Google and Facebook have proved they can still > attract users and advertisers as their traffic shifts from desktops to > mobile devices. > > But at Wikipedia, the giant online encyclopedia, the transition to a > mobile world raises a different existential question: Will people continue > to create articles and edit its nine million existing ones on the small > screen of a smartphone or tablet? > ... They may not have to, the Wikipedia site itself could be changed to redirect mobile devices to a specific mobile web site set up to auto-format the articles for the smaller screens. It may not be able to perfectly reformat every single article, but I'd bet that the vast majority would be done ok and be just as usable for mobile devices. -- Regards, David. David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:23:39 -0500 From: Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen Message-ID: <barmar-DE0482.17233914022014@news.eternal-september.org> In article <pan.2014.02.12.22.29.10.219578@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au>, David Clayton <dc33box-usenet2@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:00:11 -0500, Monty Solomon wrote: > > > Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen > > > > By NOAM COHEN > > FEB. 9, 2014 > > > > The Internet behemoths Google and Facebook have proved they can still > > attract users and advertisers as their traffic shifts from desktops to > > mobile devices. > > > > But at Wikipedia, the giant online encyclopedia, the transition to a > > mobile world raises a different existential question: Will people continue > > to create articles and edit its nine million existing ones on the small > > screen of a smartphone or tablet? > > ... > > They may not have to, the Wikipedia site itself could be changed to > redirect mobile devices to a specific mobile web site set up to > auto-format the articles for the smaller screens. > > It may not be able to perfectly reformat every single article, but I'd > bet that the vast majority would be done ok and be just as usable for > mobile devices. The question isn't about viewing articles, it's whether people will create and edit articles when they're using mobile devices. People may find the small screens too cumbersome for detailed work like this, especially if a big portion of the screen is taken up for the virtual keyboard. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:04:19 +1100 From: David Clayton <dc33box-usenet2@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen Message-ID: <pan.2014.02.15.01.04.16.159176@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:23:39 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article <pan.2014.02.12.22.29.10.219578@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au>, > David Clayton <dc33box-usenet2@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:00:11 -0500, Monty Solomon wrote: >> >> > Wikipedia vs. the Small Screen >> > >> > By NOAM COHEN >> > FEB. 9, 2014 >> > >> > The Internet behemoths Google and Facebook have proved they can still >> > attract users and advertisers as their traffic shifts from desktops >> > to mobile devices. ....... > The question isn't about viewing articles, it's whether people will > create and edit articles when they're using mobile devices. People may > find the small screens too cumbersome for detailed work like this, > especially if a big portion of the screen is taken up for the virtual > keyboard. Same difference - the editing feature should (if it is built in the right way) detect what sort of device you are using and provide an appropriate interface to get the job done. This sort of thing has been in constant evolution since we initially changed from 24x80 TTY interfaces to graphical VGA then SVGA etc. and those that wanted the essential functionality of the site/service to remain have adapted as the available technology changed. Whether people want to edit/create Wikipedia articles on tiny devices with their inherent interface limitations is another matter, that will be their choice as with all other functions where these toys are just not the right tool for the job - and I would speculate that people who are committed enough to create or edit Wikipedia articles are not you average mobile device users. -- Regards, David. David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (4 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues