32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for October 21, 2013
Volume 32 : Issue 219 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Canada to propose forcing a la carte programming (HAncock4)

====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.

Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:55:31 -0700 (PDT) From: HAncock4 <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Canada to propose forcing a la carte programming Message-ID: <d879684a-5cf7-4f8f-abc4-c8758cd9cd42@googlegroups.com> On Saturday, October 19, 2013 12:03:40 PM UTC-4, Bill Horne wrote: > The government's job is not to protect us from our own folly. The > government's job is to protect us from our neighbor's folly. We > have, and need to exercise, the option of turning the set off and > going to talk to our neighbors: about politics, the deficit, how > schools are failing at every level, our kids, the "ancient political > fish-like smell", or whatever the topic of the day is. Government regulating business affairs is nothing new. About 100 years ago some corporations became so large that the traditional model of marketplace competition no longer applied. These companies had concentrated enough economic power to themselves to treat their employees, customers, and suppliers as they dictated. This was determined to be harmful to the country and anti-trust laws were born. Recall that about 60 years ago the US government felt that the Bell System was an improper monopoly, despite it being tigtly regulated. A consent decree was obtained restricting the Bell System to mostly communications and defense and requiring it to license out its patents. Government involvment in the entertainment industry isn't new either. In the entertainment industry, a few years earlier, the motion picture studios were forced to divest the studios they owned so that independent studios could get a fair shot at renting movies. This marked the separation of film production and exhibition. Because broadcast television had an oligopoly using very limited TV airwaves, the government imposed strict regulation on broadcasters (both networks and individual stations) in exchange for being allowed to utilize those airwaves. In recent years, however, things have changed dramatically. We're back to extensively vertically integrated entertainment empires. We have Comcast, which provides telephone service, ISP, cable TV, as well as owning Universal pictures and NBC. We have telephone companies providing telephone, ISP, and cable TV service (e.g. Verizon FIOS). We have seen cable rates go up significantly year after year. Given that, as well as the history of business, it is certainly reasonable to take a fresh look at restoring government regulation that once existed in the past. FWIW, Comcast is very profitable. (In other words, years ago many people complained that the old Bell System was fleecing the public by buying its suplies from its own Western Electric--passing on inflated high prices to the customer. Today we have Comcast reselling its own content just like Western Electric.)
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org

Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (1 message)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues