31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for January 13, 2013
Volume 32 : Issue 13 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey (Mark Smith)
Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey (T)
Be productive: The Ultimate Smartphone Guide, part V (Monty Solomon)
Just How Dumb Is It For CBS To Block CNET From Giving Dish An Award? (Monty Solomon)

====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:01:50 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Smith <marklsmith@yahoo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey Message-ID: <1357995710.6994.YahooMailClassic@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> > --- On Thu, 1/10/13, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: >> Perhaps the Consumer Cellular customers have very low expectations of >> network quality, or perhaps AT&T customers just like to complain a lot. > > They probably do different things. I have a Tracfone that runs on > AT&T's network, and I think it works great. That's likely because I > make voice calls and SMS, no data. Looks like Consumer Cellular is > the same idea. I use Consumer Cellular and my girlfriend uses Tracphone. My only complaint is lack of call availability. We are in Laurel, MD and it's a very busy phone area. Sometimes I don't get a tower response (no bars) and sometimes the call starts but doesn't go through. I get a lot of voicemails where the phone never rang. Mark L. Smith marklsmith@yahoo.com http://smith.freehosting.net Http://marksfolkmusicphotos.shutterfly.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:01:32 -0500 From: T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey Message-ID: <MPG.2b5b7d1864290fd7989d84@news.eternal-september.org> In article <1357995710.6994.YahooMailClassic@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, marklsmith@yahoo.com says... > > --- On Thu, 1/10/13, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > >> Perhaps the Consumer Cellular customers have very low expectations of > >> network quality, or perhaps AT&T customers just like to complain a lot. > > > > They probably do different things. I have a Tracfone that runs on > > AT&T's network, and I think it works great. That's likely because I > > make voice calls and SMS, no data. Looks like Consumer Cellular is > > the same idea. > > I use Consumer Cellular and my girlfriend uses Tracphone. My only > complaint is lack of call availability. We are in Laurel, MD and it's > a very busy phone area. Sometimes I don't get a tower response (no > bars) and sometimes the call starts but doesn't go through. I get a > lot of voicemails where the phone never rang. That's nothing. I live in 4G saturated area. So when my phone starts saying it can't get on the net, etc. I have to reboot it. It's a Samsung SCH-R910 if you're interested. The reboots happen roughly every other day. What annoys me most about Android is that in it's pure state it's a *Nix base operating system. It should be trivial to stop and start the phone service without having to reboot the phone but no such luck. It's been so messed with by the Vendor (Samsung) and the carrier that it explains the inability to do much in that sphere.
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:46:07 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Be productive: The Ultimate Smartphone Guide, part V Message-ID: <p06240804cd177bb8582c@[10.0.1.3]> Be productive: The Ultimate Smartphone Guide, part V Phones now handle business beyond e-mail-calendars, Word processing, and more. by Andrew Cunningham Jan 10 2013 Ars Technica Today's desktops and laptops have become fast enough that we've stopped seeing huge performance increases from generation to generation. This year's processors and graphics cards are faster than last year's, but not by so much that it's worth buying a new PC every year. In smartphones, though, it's a different story. ... .... in the fifth and final entry in our ultimate smartphone guide. We'll be looking at the best way to get work done on iOS, Android, and Windows Phone 8, evaluating both the capability of each operating system's built-in apps as well as the best third-party apps for filling in functionality gaps. ... http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/01/work-it-the-ultimate-smartphone-guide-part-v/ ***** Moderator's Note ***** The ultimate smartphone is the model that you can leave in a drawer. It will answer your email, figure your cost factors, and send birthday greetings to all your boss's relatives automagically. Until that phone arrives, you'll be stuck with just-another-electronic-leash. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:28:21 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Just How Dumb Is It For CBS To Block CNET From Giving Dish An Award? Message-ID: <p06240802cd1776fc3bf5@[10.0.1.3]> Just How Dumb Is It For CBS To Block CNET From Giving Dish An Award? by Mike Masnick Jan 11 2013 Techdirt As you may or may not recall, last year, pretty much all the TV networks sued Dish Networks over a new feature it had launched, PrimeTime Any Time (PTAT), with its Autohopper technology on its DVRs. PTAT is where it would automatically record all the major networks' prime time programming and hold onto it for a bit. Autohopper would then automatically skip over the commercials. It's important to recognize that these features, on their own, have been considered legal. VCRs had auto commercial skip ages ago and DVR technology (time shifting) has been called fair use plenty of times. Given that, the lawsuits aren't going well so far. But, in a moment of pure stupidity, some very short-sighted suits at CBS made a really silly decision. As you may or may not have heard, CES -- the massive consumer electronics show -- has been going on all this week in Las Vegas. I just got back from there myself. At the show, Dish announced another merging of some of its products, adding its Slingbox (who they bought years back) to the same basic setup. Slingbox, of course, is for "place shifting" what the DVR is for "time shifting." You hook it up to your TV and it lets you access what's playing on your TV via the internet (so, via your computer, phone or tablet). It's hardly surprising that this is where Dish was heading. And... the early reviews and buzz were definitely strong. For example, CNET wrote a glowing review in which executive editor David Carnoy suggested it may be the best DVR out there these days. The CNET crew liked the thing so much that they nominated it for their "Best of CES" award. And... then the suits at CNET parent company CBS noticed. ... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130111/00145421637/just-how-dumb-is-it-cbs-to-block-cnet-giving-dish-award.shtml -or- http://goo.gl/VF4ed
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (4 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues