30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for January 28, 2012
Volume 31 : Issue 28 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Threatened by Anonymous, Symantec tells users to pull pcAnywhere's plug (Monty Solomon)
Symantec recommends disabling pcAnywhere (Monty Solomon)
Re: Cloud-based PBX service (Scott Dorsey)
Re: Cloud-based PBX service (John Levine)
Re: Cloud-based PBX service (Robert Bonomi)
No. 5 Crossbar article collection (HAncock4)
Build Up Your Phone's Defenses Against Hackers (Monty Solomon)
Curbs backed on calls by drivers (Monty Solomon)

====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:05:59 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Threatened by Anonymous, Symantec tells users to pull pcAnywhere's plug Message-ID: <gCfL_C.A._t.V4sIPB@telecom> Threatened by Anonymous, Symantec tells users to pull pcAnywhere's plug Source code leaked years ago, but now Anonymous hacking group has software in its sights By Gregg Keizer Computerworld January 26, 2012 http://goo.gl/twhz0
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:00:15 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Symantec recommends disabling pcAnywhere Message-ID: <rjhMaC.A.lt.U4sIPB@telecom> Symantec pcAnywhere Security Recommendations Introduction Upon investigation of the claims made by Anonymous regarding source code disclosure, Symantec believes that the disclosure was the result of a theft of source code that occurred in 2006. We believe that source code for the 2006-era versions of the following products was exposed: Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition; Norton Internet Security; Norton SystemWorks (Norton Utilities and Norton GoBack); and pcAnywhere. With this incident pcAnywhere customers have increased risk. Malicious users with access to the source code have an increased ability to identify vulnerabilities and build new exploits. Additionally, customers that are not following general security best practices are susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks which can reveal authentication and session information. General security best practices include endpoint, network, remote access, and physical security, as well as configuring pcAnywhere in a way that minimizes potential risks. At this time, Symantec recommends disabling the product until Symantec releases a final set of software updates that resolve currently known vulnerability risks. For customers that require pcAnywhere for business critical purposes, it is recommended that customers understand the current risks, ensure pcAnywhere 12.5 is installed, apply all relevant patches as they are released, and follow the general security best practices discussed herein. This document is designed to help customers understand the situation and to provide remediation steps to maintain the protection of their devices and information. ... http://goo.gl/2y3qv
Date: 27 Jan 2012 12:26:27 -0500 From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cloud-based PBX service Message-ID: <jfumo3$d52$1@panix2.panix.com> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: >In article <4F1DF1E2.30104@horne.net>, <tmetro+telecomdigest@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>I've been hoping that we'd see more open source apps in hosted form, and >>we have seen some, but not really wide spread. Take for example virtual >>PBXs. It's entirely feasible that we could have seen an "Asterisk >>hosting" market develop much like web hosting, but it didn't happen. > >Could it be that there is a very limited 'need' for pure virtual PBXes? Well, Bell sure sold a lot of them when they called them Centrex.... >Without PSTN interconnectivity, a virtual PBX is of very limited usefulness. >Add in the cost of self-contained VoIP phones, addressing complications if >your phones are behind PAT/ NAT, and QOS issues on oversubscribed 'consumer >grade' uplinks (especially where the 'last mile' provider is also offering >IP-based telephony -- e.g. most 'cable' companies), and you're looking at a >very much 'niche' market. Sure, but PSTN interconnectivity is now very, very cheap. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:48:21 +0000 (UTC) From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cloud-based PBX service Message-ID: <jfv9jl$2ro7$1@leila.iecc.com> >>Could it be that there is a very limited 'need' for pure virtual PBXes? > >Well, Bell sure sold a lot of them when they called them Centrex.... Indeed, but that was back when a PBX was couple of racks of noisy equipment that needed a dedicated maintenance guy. Now that a quite usable PBX can be a couple of cards in a PC, the arithmetic is quite different. These days, I'd think the main market for a virtual PBX would be virtual companies where everyone works in a home office, so the location of the PBX is arbitrary anyway. >Sure, but PSTN interconnectivity is now very, very cheap. Agreed. If you pay 1 cpm for outgoing VoIP to the US, that's a lot. R's, John
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:26:28 -0600 From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cloud-based PBX service Message-ID: <zLidnTJLHJdp5b7SnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications> In article <jfumo3$d52$1@panix2.panix.com>, Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote: >Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: >>In article <4F1DF1E2.30104@horne.net>, <tmetro+telecomdigest@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>I've been hoping that we'd see more open source apps in hosted form, and >>>we have seen some, but not really wide spread. Take for example virtual >>>PBXs. It's entirely feasible that we could have seen an "Asterisk >>>hosting" market develop much like web hosting, but it didn't happen. >> >>Could it be that there is a very limited 'need' for pure virtual PBXes? > >Well, Bell sure sold a lot of them when they called them Centrex.... Yes Bell did, BUT what they were selling was remotely-located, managed, physical PBX service, with hard-wire trunk circuits and dedicated wire-pairs to the customer equipment. >>Without PSTN interconnectivity, a virtual PBX is of very limited usefulness. >>Add in the cost of self-contained VoIP phones, addressing complications if >>your phones are behind PAT/ NAT, and QOS issues on oversubscribed 'consumer >>grade' uplinks (especially where the 'last mile' provider is also offering >>IP-based telephony -- e.g. most 'cable' companies), and you're looking at a >>very much 'niche' market. > >Sure, but PSTN interconnectivity is now very, very cheap. "Not Exactly" applies. A physical presence/termination is required in every rate center where you wish to offer LNP (possibly requiring inter- connect with multiple IXCs at each site), plus backhaul to the location(s) where the PBX(s) live, plus ...
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:32:28 -0800 (PST) From: HAncock4 <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: No. 5 Crossbar article collection Message-ID: <e0e2e0ef-c094-4897-9b40-a7867dbe05f6@v14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> Recently interest was expressed in this switching system. The Telephone Collectors International (TCI) organization maintains a website with a collection of numerous historical telephony documentation. Included is "a digital reproduction of a book published by Bell Labs containing a number of articles from 1949 to 1951 that detail most aspects of the No. 5 Crossbar. The articles were all publised in the Bell Laboratories Record. The entire book is 150 pages. Due to the large number of images the book is presented with each article in a separate PDF. This makes the file sizes more maneageable." http://www.telephonecollectors.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=76&Itemid=2 TCI is an excellent organization. E-membership is only $25/year. Their general website is at: http://www.telephonecollectors.info
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:15:15 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Build Up Your Phone's Defenses Against Hackers Message-ID: <1n1FP.A.kzG.G84IPB@telecom> Build Up Your Phone's Defenses Against Hackers By KATE MURPHY January 25, 2012 Chuck Bokath would be terrifying if he were not such a nice guy. A jovial senior engineer at the Georgia Tech Research Institute in Atlanta, Mr. Bokath can hack into your cellphone just by dialing the number. He can remotely listen to your calls, read your text messages, snap pictures with your phone's camera and track your movements around town - not to mention access the password to your online bank account. And while Mr. Bokath's job is to expose security flaws in wireless devices, he said it was "trivial" to hack into a cellphone. Indeed, the instructions on how to do it are available online (the link most certainly will not be provided here). "It's actually quite frightening," said Mr. Bokath. "Most people have no idea how vulnerable they are when they use their cellphones." Technology experts expect breached, infiltrated or otherwise compromised cellphones to be the scourge of 2012. The smartphone security company Lookout Inc. estimates that more than a million phones worldwide have already been affected. But there are ways to reduce the likelihood of getting hacked - whether by a jealous ex or Russian crime syndicate - or at least minimize the damage should you fall prey. As cellphones have gotten smarter, they have become less like phones and more like computers, and thus susceptible to hacking. But unlike desktop or even most laptop computers, cellphones are almost always on hand, and are often loaded with even more personal information. So an undefended or carelessly operated phone can result in a breathtaking invasion of individual privacy as well as the potential for data corruption and outright theft. ... http://goo.gl/0RD97
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:45:27 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Curbs backed on calls by drivers Message-ID: <JpfAcD.A.KzG.G84IPB@telecom> Curbs backed on calls by drivers By Eric Moskowitz Globe Staff / January 27, 2012 Drivers would be banned from dialing and even holding cellphones under a bill endorsed by the Legislature's Joint Transportation Committee today. Proponents of the measure, which would make Massachusetts the 10th state to ban hand-held phone use while driving, say they want to finish the work they started with 2010's Safe Driving Law. That law banned any form of cellphone use by drivers under 18 and outlawed texting behind the wheel for adults. But the difficulty of distinguishing between dialing and texting has made that ban hard to enforce. ... http://goo.gl/QNYXu
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
863-455-9426
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (8 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues