31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for October 24, 2012
Volume 31 : Issue 248 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Paper prophets: Why e-voting is on the decline in the United States (Monty Solomon)
Re: Voter surveys difficult due to cell phones (T)

====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:58:55 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Paper prophets: Why e-voting is on the decline in the United States Message-ID: <p06240839ccacf84d62f9@[]> Paper prophets: Why e-voting is on the decline in the United States States see the virtue of paper ballots, but some lack funds to ditch e-voting. by Timothy B. Lee Oct 22 2012 Ars Technica Ernest Zirkle was puzzled. The resident of Fairfield Township in Cumberland County, NJ, ran for a seat on his local Democratic Executive Committee on June 7, 2011. The official results showed him earning only nine votes, compared to 34 votes for the winning candidate. But at least 28 people told Zirkle they voted for him. So he and his wife-who also ran for an open seat and lost-challenged the result in court. Eventually, a county election official admitted the result was due to a programming error. A security expert from Princeton was called in to examine the machines and make sure no foul play had occurred. Unfortunately, when he examined the equipment on August 17, 2011, he found someone deleted key files the previous day, making it impossible to investigate the cause of the malfunction. A new election was held on September 27, and the Zirkles won. A decade ago, there was a great deal of momentum toward paperless electronic voting. Spooked by the chaos of the 2000 presidential election in Florida, Congress unleashed a torrent of money to buy new high-tech machines. Today, momentum is in the opposite direction. Computer security researchers have convinced most observers that machines like the ones in Fairfield Township degrade the security and reliability of elections rather than enhancing them. Several states passed laws mandating an end to paperless elections. But bureaucratic inertia and tight budgets have slowed the pace at which these flawed machines can be retired. Luckily, no e-voting catastrophes seem to have occurred. The irregularities that have risen to public attention since 2006 have tended to be small-scale or low-stakes incidents like the one in Fairfield Township. But lack of high-profile failure is not an argument for complacency. If an election were stolen by hackers in a state that used paperless voting machines, we wouldn't necessarily be able to detect it. Just because a major disaster hasn't happened in recent elections doesn't mean it can't happen in 2012. ... http://arstechnica.com/features/2012/10/paper-prophets-why-e-voting-is-on-the-decline-in-the-united-states/ ***** Moderator's Note ***** It's impossible to say if any "e-voting catastrophes" have occurred, or if pivotal local and state elections that saw reformers defeated have been "decided" by jerrymandered e-votes - just that nobody ever got caught. I think that George W. Bush was elected by Diebold's voting software, not the voters, and I'll carry that suspicion to my grave. Those few computer security experts who were given access to Diebold's software were unanimous in thier criticism of the design concepts, the implementations, and the lack of ordinary security features. They couldn't discuss details - in itself, a tragedy - but everyone I've seen interviewed said "They did it wrong" in one way or another. Say what you want about paper ballots, but there's one thing that nobody can say - that paper ballots are proprietary or privileged or too complicated for ordinary people to undertand. If voters like me believe the process is corrupt at its core, then we cease to live in a democracy. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:25:24 -0400 From: T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Voter surveys difficult due to cell phones Message-ID: <MPG.2af09d12df9f68ab989dc7@news.eternal-september.org> In article <iauv78ljk12tv96c4o6f7pt5uqncjum86j@4ax.com>, PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org says... [Moderator snip] > As it is now, all my phones are on both state and fed no-call lists, I > work at home, as a practical matter I have to answer every time the > phone rings because it might be a client needing help. > > I'm writing software, so every time I have to answer the phone > the little house of cards I have in my mind goes "Poof!" and > after the call it takes a couple of minutes to re-create it. > > I'm getting at least a dozen telephone solicitor or robo calls a > day...DNC lists notwithstanding... > > I'm right on the edge of being a single-issue voter on this. Not > quite... but disturbingly close. It's even a problem on cell phones lately. I just installed the Android app called BlackList - with it the phone never rings if your number is in the list. Now if I could only do something about the spam texts. Or more that irks me - the text message I got from my carrier - in Spanish no less. ***** Moderator's Note ***** How does "Blacklist" work? Can it be used on any Android-based phone? Bill Horne Moderator
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org

Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (2 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues