30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for July 4, 2012
====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:45:10 -0400 From: Pete Cresswell <PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Cold call firms flaunt rules that block telemarketers Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Per Joseph Singer: > >The problem is that the calls just keep coming - and coming. And, IMHO, will continue to do so even if laws are passed (as in the USA). This is from the USA perspective of one who is on both the nationwide and state Do-Not-Call lists. Years ago, when the laws were new, reporting somebody actually had an effect and unsolicited calls were rare. I even got a few of bucks once when the state took a telemarketer to court, won, and split the settlement among people who complained. Since then: - Legislators get paid off to grant exceptions. Oops... not "paid off".... To be politically correct: "Lobbied".... - Telemarketers move offshore and hide behind multiple VOIP relays - Various prosecutors give up trying to climb the technology curve. - (I suspect) The free-market wing nuts manage to restrict funding for prosecutions. Bottom line, whatever the causes, our listed phone gets at least three unsolicited calls per day 7 days a week and I've had to resort to maxing out the greeting length on my cell phone just to dodge most of the robo calls. Some of the robo calls are bordering on abusive. One got to my answering machine a couple of days ago to the effect of "You may have big problems with your XYZ credit card account and you'd better call us quick before Bad Things happen...." Needless-to-say, nobody's looking forward to the election season.... I'm half-waiting for some wag to erect a sign on their front lawn listing the total robo calls from each party as a possible litmus test for which one to not vote for. I'm pretty sure there is a technological fix that involves challenge/response... but I don't think the service providers have caught on to the potential demand yet. But, IMHO, it's just a matter of time. -- Pete Cresswell ***** Moderator's Note ***** I have a gadget that generates SIT tones whenever I go off-hook. It seems to be working well, even for the politicians. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:40:02 -0700 From: Steven <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Cold call firms flaunt rules that block telemarketers Message-ID: <email@example.com> On 7/2/12 11:45 AM, Pete Cresswell wrote: > Per Joseph Singer: >> >> The problem is that the calls just keep coming - and coming. > > And, IMHO, will continue to do so even if laws are passed (as in > the USA). > > This is from the USA perspective of one who is on both the > nationwide and state Do-Not-Call lists. > > Years ago, when the laws were new, reporting somebody actually > had an effect and unsolicited calls were rare. [Moderator snip] > I'm pretty sure there is a technological fix that involves > challenge/response... but I don't think the service providers > have caught on to the potential demand yet. > > But, IMHO, it's just a matter of time. If you built the SIT generator, you should sell them. -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2012 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.