30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for September 26, 2011
Volume 30 : Issue 242 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors (John Levine)
Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors (David Clayton)
Re: Net neutrality rules kick in November 20 (Thad Floryan)
Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors (Steven)
Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors (tlvp)
Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors (David Clayton)

====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: 25 Sep 2011 00:31:07 -0000 From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors Message-ID: <20110925003107.11737.qmail@joyce.lan> >Last year a hotel attempted to charge me for access: it appears that >the system detected my Ibooks AirPort Card. I did not use their >system, ... More likely they just charge everyone and take the charge off if you complain. It's the same deal as the copy of USA Today in front of your door each morning that you don't read. R's, John
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:51:48 +1000 From: David Clayton <dcstarbox-usenet@yahoo.com.au> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors Message-ID: <pan.2011.09.25.00.18.47.352063@yahoo.com.au> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:01:19 -0400, tlvp wrote: > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:16:17 -0700, Steven wrote: > >> Last year a hotel attempted to charge me for access: it appears that the >> system detected my Ibooks AirPort Card. I did not use their system, >> since I carry an Overdrive from Sprint and when I logged [in], I [knew] >> I was using it and not the hotel [WiFi]. ... > > Unpuzzle me, please: even if the system did detect your AirPort card, > how'd it know to link that card to your bill and not to someone else's? > Good question, AFAIK you usually have to log into a web page to authenticate with Room number etc. Since most "Smartphones" can also auto-connect to any available Wi-Fi network then charging for those if they happen to hook up would also be an issue. Maybe there is a WAP in every room? -- Regards, David. David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:27:09 -0700 From: Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Net neutrality rules kick in November 20 Message-ID: <4E7E674D.4020104@thadlabs.com> On 9/23/2011 8:24 PM, Bill Horne wrote: > This is from cnet: > > The FCC rules--the outcome of years of debate--lay out specific Net > neutrality principles and essentially let Internet service providers ration > access to their networks while preventing them from discriminating against > content that comes from competitors. The rules are more strict for wired > broadband providers than for wireless carriers. > > Read more: > http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20110468-266/net-neutrality-rules-kick-in-november-20 The article didn't cite where a copy of the rules can be found; they're here (1.1 MB, 155 pages): http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2011-24259_PI.pdf
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:30:19 -0700 From: Steven <diespammers@ikillspammers.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors Message-ID: <j5m07d$5a6$1@dont-email.me> On 9/24/11 1:01 PM, tlvp wrote: > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:16:17 -0700, Steven wrote: > >> Last year a hotel attempted to charge me for access: it appears that >> the system detected my Ibooks AirPort Card. I did not use their >> system, since I carry an Overdrive from Sprint and when I logged [in], >> I [knew] I was using it and not the hotel [WiFi]. ... > > Unpuzzle me, please: even if the system did detect your AirPort card, > how'd it know to link that card to your bill and not to someone else's? That was one of the questions I asked and was told each room had its own receiver, I pointed out that even if that was a fact, then mine should have been turned off, so if it was on it still was not my problem. plus it could not have been that short of a range since mine at home works up to 100 feet. I showed the manager my computer with the card and my Hot Spot showing that it was linked to its own, I also showed him the hotels hot spots and each one was locked and you needed a code to get it to a allow use, by the way, the code was the room number, end of problem. -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2011 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:48:29 -0400 From: tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors Message-ID: <wgo77hxda227.6hs6twf7z1m8.dlg@40tude.net> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:30:19 -0700, Steven wrote: > ... by the way, the code was the room number, ... Ah-hah! So a clever lodger here need only log in with an access point serving another room? Or maybe even with any handy access point, but using as code another room number? Doesn't sound all that well planned out, now, does it :-) ? Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:25:13 +1000 From: David Clayton <dcstarbox-usenet@yahoo.com.au> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: mobile wifi hotspots, was Strange new at&t rumors Message-ID: <pan.2011.09.25.22.25.12.711564@yahoo.com.au> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:30:19 -0700, Steven wrote: ....... > That was one of the questions I asked and was told each room had its own > receiver, I pointed out that even if that was a fact, then mine should > have been turned off, so if it was on it still was not my problem. plus it > could not have been that short of a range since mine at home works up to > 100 feet. I showed the manager my computer with the card and my Hot Spot > showing that it was linked to its own, I also showed him the hotels hot > spots and each one was locked and you needed a code to get it to a allow > use, by the way, the code was the room number, end of problem. So if the "Hot Spots" are not set to the same frequency (or you disable the one in your room), then you can connect to another room and rack up charges on their account? -- Regards, David. David Clayton Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a measure of how many questions you have.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
863-455-9426
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2011 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (6 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues