Volume 29 : Issue 86 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Law Enforcement Appliance Subverts SSL
Can I get a Blackbery 8330 working without a contract
Re: Can I get a Blackbery 8330 working without a contract
====== 28 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime. Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:39:14 -0500
From: Dave Garland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Law Enforcement Appliance Subverts SSL
Bill Horne wrote:
> For a careful Internet user, who is using a secure machine, to be
> deceived into believing that a fraudulent website which claims to
> be www.high-priced-bank.com is the real deal, the attackers must go
> through a multi-step process...
> Step "D" is relatively doable, assuming the attacker has access to
> the LAN the victim is using, but that's not as easy as it might
> seem: assuming the victim is using a DSL or Cable Internet
> connection, the only place the "LAN" connection is easily available
> is between the victim's computer and the high-speed modem, which is
> usually co-located with the computer. Keep in mind that the device
> Wired has featured is intended be used at a LAN interface, such as
> an Ethernet patch panel, but that assumes that "law enforcement"
> personnel have access to the wire closet and that they can prove
> in a court that they did so legally.
If the last decade has taught us anything, it is that government
employees ("LEO" is just another three-letter acronym) sometimes don't
bother with that last step. And that it is very rare that they be
held responsible for the omission. And of course, we can be pretty
sure that nongovernment types won't worry about it.
Though I suspect that since the infrastructure is so unreliably
maintained (certificates not renewed, IP numbers changed, links to
noncovered servers) most users will just click through the warnings,
since the certificates have cried "wolf!" so many times already.
Though for your VoIP calls, I expect it's much simpler just to get
access from the VoIP provider. I think it's the height of naivete to
think that LEOs always have court orders to back them up when doing
wiretaps, whether of telephones or data networks.
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:50:25 -0400
From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net>
Subject: Can I get a Blackbery 8330 working without a contract
One of my son's friends has been using a Blackberry model 8330 phone
He had a falling-out with his girlfriend, who was the account holder,
and now he wants to sell me the phone. I need to know if there's a way
to use it without the two-year contract Sprint demands for a new
account, and what feature(s) this phone offers other than regular
(Filter QRM for direct replies)
"If I'm feeling edgy, there's a chick who's paid to be my slave
'cause she'll hit me with a needle if she thinks I bound to misbehave."
-- James Taylor
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:39:48 -0700
From: Steven <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Can I get a Blackbery 8330 working without a contract
Bill Horne wrote:
> One of my son's friends has been using a Blackberry model 8330 phone
> on Sprint.
> He had a falling-out with his girlfriend, who was the account holder,
> and now he wants to sell me the phone. I need to know if there's a way
> to use it without the two-year contract Sprint demands for a new
> account, and what feature(s) this phone offers other than regular
> phone service.
You should be able to use it on their network with no contract, that
is if the phone was not under contract and the phones ESN is
clear. Twice I have supplied my own phones since I was able to get it
even cheaper then if I had bought it with a contract. I did sign a
contract on one that I bought so that I could get a rebate which made
the phone free from what I had paid for it and getting another $200.
The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today?
(c) 2010 I Kill Spammers, Inc., A Rot in Hell. Co.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom-
munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.
The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: email@example.com?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then. Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!
URL information: http://telecom-digest.org
Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list.
All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
End of The Telecom Digest (3 messages)