Pat, the Editor

27 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Classified Ads
TD Extra News

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

 
 
Message Digest 
Volume 28 : Issue 240 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: GSM-only interference 
  Coupons You Don't Clip, Sent to Your Cellphone
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Re: Pop song phone number goes up for auction 
  Internet turns 40  
  Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills 
  Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? 
  Re: Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? 
  Re: Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? 


====== 27 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ====== Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 30 Aug 2009 03:30:43 -0000 From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <20090830033043.63298.qmail@simone.iecc.com> >> ObTelecom: how many places are there in the country where you can >> still pay your phone bill in person at the phone company? >I'm told that you [may pay your] phone bill (wire line and wireless) >in person at AT&T phone stores in California, though it seems to be a >big secret. Verizon Phone Marts also [accept payments]. Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two blocks from the village hall. R's, John ***** Moderator's Note ***** I thought the Verizon HQ was in New York city. Not so? Bill Horne ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:49:07 -0700 From: Steven <diespammers@killspammers.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <h7e3h5$2eq$1@news.eternal-september.org> John Levine wrote: >>> ObTelecom: how many places are there in the country where you can >>> still pay your phone bill in person at the phone company? > >> I'm told that you [may pay your] phone bill (wire line and wireless) >> in person at AT&T phone stores in California, though it seems to be a >> big secret. Verizon Phone Marts also [accept payments]. > > Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two > blocks from the village hall. > > R's, > John > > ***** Moderator's Note ***** > > I thought the Verizon HQ was in New York city. Not so? > > Bill Horne > Verizon took over the old AT&T campus I believe. A good chunk of its HQ is also still in the old GTE HQ near Dallas, Tx. -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2009 I Kill Spammers, inc, A Rot in Hell. Co. ------------------------------ Date: 30 Aug 2009 15:12:12 -0000 From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <20090830151212.36547.qmail@simone.iecc.com> >Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two >blocks from the village hall. >***** Moderator's Note ***** > >I thought the Verizon HQ was in New York city. Not so? Verizon? Who's that? http://www.ottctel.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=61 ***** Moderator's Note ***** Oh, I see: one of those kinds of telephone company ... (sniff) Bill Horne ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:47:20 -0500 From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <C9GdnQBr8bSTeAfXnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@posted.visi> John Levine wrote: >>> ObTelecom: how many places are there in the country where you can >>> still pay your phone bill in person at the phone company? > >> I'm told that you [may pay your] phone bill (wire line and wireless) >> in person at AT&T phone stores in California, though it seems to be a >> big secret. Verizon Phone Marts also [accept payments]. > > Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two > blocks from the village hall. And, no doubt, if you had a beef with the bill, you could invite the company owner out into the parking lot to settle it. Dave ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:51:06 -0700 From: Steven <diespammers@killspammers.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <h7evoq$f0o$1@news.eternal-september.org> Dave Garland wrote: > John Levine wrote: >>>> ObTelecom: how many places are there in the country where you can >>>> still pay your phone bill in person at the phone company? >>> I'm told that you [may pay your] phone bill (wire line and wireless) >>> in person at AT&T phone stores in California, though it seems to be a >>> big secret. Verizon Phone Marts also [accept payments]. >> Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two >> blocks from the village hall. > > And, no doubt, if you had a beef with the bill, you could invite the > company owner out into the parking lot to settle it. > > Dave > The doorman there is that big dude from the old Laugh In; the one that Ernestine sends out when you don't pay your bill. -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2009 I Kill Spammers, inc, A Rot in Hell. Co. ------------------------------ Date: 30 Aug 2009 22:52:07 -0000 From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <20090830225207.48071.qmail@simone.iecc.com> >> Gee, here in Trumansburg we drop by the corporate HQ. It's only two >> blocks from the village hall. > >And, no doubt, if you had a beef with the bill, you could invite the >company owner out into the parking lot to settle it. Don't be silly. We'd negotiate over a beer at the bar around the corner. R's, John ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:21:51 -0700 From: Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: GSM-only interference Message-ID: <4A9A1A7F.3080204@thadlabs.com> On 8/29/2009 5:01 PM, Thad Floryan wrote: > [...] And noone else there could coax a > TIXM103 transistor into flat operation across the L or S bands for space apps. > [...] L band was 1-2 GHz and S band was 2-4 GHz. Following is a short anecdote that perhaps should be preserved for posterity. When I began working in that field, GC or GCPS was the common way to express giga cycles per second (now GHz). Some people resisted the change to Hz from CPS, and one colleague had a reasonable argument for maintaining the status quo. If the goal was to honor someone, why not honor Charles Proteus Steinmetz and we'd get to keep CPS instead of changing to Hz. Food for thought. :-) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:51:33 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Coupons You Don't Clip, Sent to Your Cellphone Message-ID: <p06240819c6c03431f3e1@[10.0.1.3]> Coupons You Don't Clip, Sent to Your Cellphone By JENNA WORTHAM August 29, 2009 Hunter Gilmore was never big on clipping coupons. "You stick them on the fridge, meaning to use them, and it never happens," said Mr. Gilmore, a 29-year-old actor and advertising agency recruiter in Manhattan. But thanks to his cellphone, Mr. Gilmore has lately been awash in discounts, regularly scoring reduced prices and special offers that he would never cut out of a newspaper circular. Mobile coupons - usually text messages with discount codes sent to a cellphone - are becoming the blue-light specials for the digital age, promoting last-minute clothing sales, two-for-one entrees and cheap tickets to the theater. While some mobile coupons are sent directly from a retailer to a customer who has signed up for mobile updates, the other way for bargain-seekers to get up-to-the-minute deals is to subscribe to a mobile-coupon aggregator. At Web sites like 8coupons, Cellfire, Yowza and Zavers, users can sign up for different retailers' promotions in one place. The opt-in model means subscribers get only offers they want to receive, making each one worth reading. Snipping out coupons from the weekend paper is still the most common way households in the United States get their coupons, but the popularity of coupons delivered via e-mail and text messages is growing. In the first half of 2009, nearly 10 million digital coupons were redeemed, a 25 percent increase over the amount redeemed during the same period in 2008, according to Inmar, a coupon-processing company. The convenience of digital coupons is appealing to a new crop of shoppers, many of whom would not dream of carrying around a crumpled pile of paper coupons just to get 30 cents off a box of spaghetti. About a third of the users who signed up for Cellfire say they have never used paper coupons, according to Cellfire's chief executive, Brent Dusing. The growing popularity of feature-rich mobile phones does not hurt, either. "It's not like you have to get a new phone to do this," said J. Gerry Purdy, an analyst for Frost & Sullivan, a market research firm. "It's just a slight behavioral change to what people already do." The widespread adoption of text messaging and sleeker, richer phone interfaces also makes mobile transactions easier. Some shoppers are turning to mobile applications that collect coupons, like Coupon Sherpa, an iPhone application that handles coupons for retailers like Kmart, Toys "R" Us and Zales. Since its release in April, Coupon Sherpa has been downloaded more than 65,000 times. Taking the concept of mobile coupons a step further, aggregators 8Coupons and Mobiqpons recently introduced location-based features. Using the services, users can receive discount offers from merchants who are only a few blocks away. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/technology/29coupon.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT) From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <90c53635-8f0f-45e0-bf7f-8a056c10ae36@o35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> On Aug 29, 7:59 pm, Wesr...@aol.com wrote: > >     I think it is inappropriate to bring up "social benefits" in this > discussion. .  .  it is not the function of a utility to be an agent > of social activism. Ever since utilities became a necessary part of everyday life and achieved monopoly status, "social benefits" was and is to this day a critical issue in rate and service discussions and regulation. I think it most certainly is valid for discussion here, as applicable to utility services. In the winter, there are frequent newspaper articles about fires caused by unsafe space heaters, stoves left on, or overloaded outlets all done because either electricity or gas was cut off for non payment of bills. The object of hostility was the "cold hearted utility company" who cut off the poor suffering family. Many PUCs have issued strict rules on how delinquent payers are to be handled with many protections, and as a result utilities lose big money on them (which the rest of us have to make up). One municipally owned gas works has a very bad deficit as a result of a city ordered very liberal policy of no-cutoffs to deadbeats. We pay a Universal Service tax on our phone bill, and low income subscribers may get discounted service. Social issues very much affect utility services and will continue to do so in the future. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:59:03 -0500 From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <F62dnUPVE4x6IAfXnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications> In article <1099771f-bfb8-4a4a-85b7-1973f882b75c@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: >I suspect part of the void will be filled by on-line services. >Perhaps there will be food and service delivery by on-line request. >The technical part is pretty easy, but reliable logistics will be >tough. Finding good delivery people isn't easy. > On-line ordering and grocery delivery already exists in a significant part of the country. One company, alone, (Peapod, <http://www.peapod.com>) covers the greater Chicago area and S.E. Wisconsin, and a sizable swath along the East Coast (Virginia to Mass.) "Netgrocer.com", and Schwanns both claim coverage of the 'contiguous 48 states', but with limited selections. These kind of services have been around for more than a decade. Peapod is celebrating TWENTY YEARS in business, this year. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:48:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "harold@hallikainen.com" <harold@hallikainen.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: Pop song phone number goes up for auction Message-ID: <524b704d-b399-43b7-bbef-a60d07fad62f@d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com> In the 1970s, I worked for a radio station in Santa Maria, CA, at the very north end of Santa Barbara county. You cross the Santa Maria river and you're in San Luis Obispo county. Santa Maria had GTE with a step switch. San Luis Obispo county had Pacific Telephone with a variety of switches, but all used 7 digit or area code plus 7 dgit dialing. The switch in Santa Maria, though, would absorb the first two of the seven digits, so most people just dialed five digits. Most radio ads gave the 5 digit phone number which half the listening area (but a much smaller portion of the population) could not dial. I always thought that was strange at the time. Harold ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:08:29 -0700 From: Steven <diespammers@killspammers.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Internet turns 40 Message-ID: <h7f49v$u31$1@news.eternal-september.org> Aug 30, 3:00 PM (ET) By ANICK JESDANUN NEW YORK (AP) - Goofy videos weren't on the minds of Len Kleinrock and his team at UCLA when they began tests 40 years ago on what would become the Internet. Neither was social networking, for that matter, nor were most of the other easy-to-use applications that have drawn more than a billion people online. Instead the researchers sought to create an open network for freely exchanging information, an openness that ultimately spurred the innovation that would later spawn the likes of YouTube, Facebook and the World Wide Web. There's still plenty of room for innovation today, yet the openness fostering it may be eroding. While the Internet is more widely available and faster than ever, artificial barriers threaten to constrict its growth. http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090830/D9ADCOL00.html -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2009 I Kill Spammers, inc, A Rot in Hell. Co. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:32:25 -0400 From: Curtis R Anderson <gleepy@gleepy.net> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: NYS mandates "large print" for utility bills Message-ID: <4A9B1A19.4050305@gleepy.net> John Levine wrote: >> Nit pick--in the case cited where a smll municipality sends bills on >> postcards there is no return envelope. > > Good point. Most of us pay the water bill in person at the village > hall since we're passing by anyway. Particularly the old folks who > rush over and pay the day the bill arrives because they hate owing > money to anyone. > > ObTelecom: how many places are there in the country where you can > still pay your phone bill in person at the phone company? Many years ago, (I think about 10) I had to change ISPs as one in the Jamestown, NY area was pulling out of the market. So I went off to visit the three ISP offerings. Two were run by independent telephone operating companies. The first was the ISP run by DFT Communications, where the Maytum family still provides dial tone to folks around Fredonia, NY. The corporate headquarters were set up to allow folks to pay their bills in person. Next, I headed west along US 20 to Westfield, NY where C&E Communications makes their home. Their building was also set up so folks could pay their bill in person. While asking about their ISP offering, someone did walk in to pay their bill that way. It seems to be a great way to pay the phone bill in cash for older folks. The third place was a Jamestown based dedicated ISP which I settled upon. While not a phone company, I have gone in there to pay my ISP bill on at least one occasion, until I got the credit card auto-payment set up. -- Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still Email not munged, SpamAssassin [tm] in effect. http://www.gleepy.net/ mailto:gleepy@intelligencia.com mailto:gleepy@gleepy.net (and others) Yahoo!: gleepythehen ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:35:40 -0400 From: ed <bernies@netaxs.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? Message-ID: <1251678940.4a9b1adc4fc64@webmail.uslec.net> This editorial in Business Week about the need for more R&D facilities like Bell Labs to revive the U.S. economy might interest Telecom list members. A young friend (born years after the divestiture) who works for the govt systems division of Alcatel-Lucent in NJ says it was the fault of the U.S. gov't for breaking up the Bell System. Others say AT&T really wanted to be broken up and divested of its expensive-to-maintain LEC's, and allowed a free hand to compete in the more profitable data services arena. Opinions, anyone? -Ed http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/09_36/b4145036681619.htm The Future of Tech August 27, 2009, 5:00PM EST Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? How basic research can repair the broken U.S. business model By Adrian Slywotzky Name an industry that can produce 1 million new, high-paying jobs over the next three years. You can't, because there isn't one. And that's the problem. America needs good jobs, soon. We need 6.7 million just to replace losses from the current recession, then another 10 million to spark demand over the next decade. That's 15 million to 17 million new jobs. In the 1990s, the U.S. economy created a net 22 million jobs (a rate of 2.2 million per year), so we know it can be done. Between 2000 and the end of 2007 (the beginning of the current recession), however, the economy created new jobs at a rate of 900,000 a year, so we know it isn't doing it now. The pipeline is dry because the U.S. business model is broken. Our growth engine has run out of a key source of fuel—critical mass, basic scientific research. The U.S. scientific innovation infrastructure has historically consisted of a loose public-private partnership that included legendary institutions such as Bell Labs, RCA Labs, Xerox PARC XRX, the research operations of IBM IBM, DARPA, NASA, and others. In each of these organizations, programs with clear commercial potential were supported alongside efforts at "pure" research, with the two streams often feeding one another. With abundant corporate and venture-capital funding for eventual commercialization, these research labs have made enormous contributions to science, technology, and the economy, including the creation of millions of high-paying jobs. Consider a few of the crown jewels from Bell Labs alone: * The first public demonstration of fax transmission (1925) * First long-distance TV transmission (1927) * Invention of the transistor (1947) * Invention of photovoltaic cell (1954) * Creation of the UNIX operating system (1969) * Technology for cellular telephony (1978) [Moderator snip] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:22:35 +0000 (UTC) From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? Message-ID: <h7fflq$lqp$1@reader1.panix.com> In <1251678940.4a9b1adc4fc64@webmail.uslec.net> ed <bernies@netaxs.com> writes: [major snippage] >This editorial in Business Week about the need for more R&D facilities >like Bell Labs to revive the U.S. economy might interest Telecom list >members. >http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/09_36/b4145036681619.htm >The Future of Tech August 27, 2009, 5:00PM EST >* Technology for cellular telephony (1978) Which is how, of course, that Motorola's engineering guru, Martin Cooper, made that first "cellular call" back on 03-April-1973, to... his friendly rival at AT&T who came in second.... >[Moderator snip] -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:37:48 -0700 From: Steven <diespammers@killspammers.com> To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu Subject: Re: Where Have You Gone, Bell Labs? Message-ID: <h7fgie$409$1@news.eternal-september.org> ed wrote: > This editorial in Business Week about the need for more R&D facilities > like Bell Labs to revive the U.S. economy might interest Telecom list > members. > > A young friend (born years after the divestiture) who works for the > govt systems division of Alcatel-Lucent in NJ says it was the fault of > the U.S. gov't for breaking up the Bell System. Others say AT&T > really wanted to be broken up and divested of its expensive-to-maintain > LEC's, and allowed a free hand to compete in the more profitable > data services arena. > > Opinions, anyone? > > -Ed It was clear the AT&T wanted out of the local switching business. Verizon is now doing the same thing in what they call "under served" areas. -- The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2009 I Kill Spammers, inc, A Rot in Hell. Co. ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is currently being moderated by Bill Horne while Pat Townson recovers from a stroke. Contact information: Bill Horne Telecom Digest 43 Deerfield Road Sharon MA 02067-2301 781-784-7287 bill at horne dot net Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of The Telecom digest (16 messages) ******************************

Return to Archives**Older Issues