Message-ID: <20220409155140.DEF34810@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: How Do The CPRA, CPA, And VCDPA Treat Dark Patterns?
by David M. Stauss and Stacey Weber
Keypoint: The CPRA and CPA introduce the concept of dark patterns into
state consumer data privacy laws although this area has come under
increased attention recently with FTC enforcement actions and
guidance, state attorneys general lawsuits, and class action
litigation.
This is the seventh post in our ten-part weekly series comparing key
provisions of the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), Colorado
Privacy Act (CPA), and Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act
(VCDPA). With the operative dates of these laws drawing near, we are
exploring important distinctions between them. If you are not already
subscribed to our blog, consider subscribing now to stay updated.
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/privacy-protection/1173708/how-do-the-cpra-cpa-and-vcdpa-treat-dark-patterns?email_access=on
--
(Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
Message-ID: <20220409154553.9C92A810@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:45:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: California AG's First CCPA Opinion Takes A Broad View Of
The Right To Access Inferences
by Aaron Burstein and Alexander Schneider
In the first formal written opinion interpreting CCPA compliance
obligations, California Attorney General Rob Bonta concludes that the
CCPA grants consumers the right to know and access internally
generated inferences that businesses generate about them, but that the
CCPA does not require businesses to disclose trade secrets.
The 15-page opinion, issued on March 10, responds to a question posed
by Sacramento area Assemblyman Kevin Kiley (R): "Under the California
Consumer Privacy Act, does a consumer's right to know the specific
pieces of personal information that a business has collected about
that consumer apply to internally generated inferences the business
holds about the consumer from either internal or external information
sources?"
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/advertising-marketing-branding/1172708/california-ag39s-first-ccpa-opinion-takes-a-broad-view-of-the-right-to-access-inferences?type=popular
--
(Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
Message-ID: <20220409152910.B8048810@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: TCPA - Dead Or Alive?
by Mark S. Eisen
We are now nearly one year PF -- Post-Facebook, the seminal
decision that effectively shut down the central avenue used by
Plaintiffs' lawyers to assert liability under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act. So where is the TCPA now?
By way of brief recap, on April 1, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its
decision in Facebook v. Duguid, which evaluated the TCPA's key
statutory definition of an Automatic Telephone Dialing System, known
as an ATDS. See Facebook v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163, 1167 (2021). The
TCPA's definition is deceptively simple:
The term "automatic telephone dialing system" means equipment which
has the capacity -
(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random
or sequential number generator; and
(B) to dial such numbers.
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/telecoms-mobile-cable-communications/1174248/tcpa--dead-or-alive?type=popular
--
(Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
