33 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Copyright © 2015 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved.

The Telecom Digest for Mar 6, 2015
Volume 34 : Issue 46 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Mobile Network Operators Under Pressure (colin)
New FCC rules are not a federal takeover (Bill Horne)
How Comcast, Verizon, and the Rest of Big Telecom Blew the Net-Neutrality Battle (Bill Horne)
Comcast and AT&T might not sue FCC after all (Bill Horne)

The people can never understand why the President does not use his powers to make them behave. Well all the president is, is a glorified public relations man who spends his time flattering, kissing, and kicking people to get them to do what they are supposed to do anyway.  - Harry S. Truman

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details.

Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 10:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: colin <colin_sutton@ieee.org> To: telecomdigestsubmissions.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Mobile Network Operators Under Pressure Message-ID: <md9atr$2qgg$1@adenine.netfront.net> ... The premium product of mobile voice is now just another undistinguished digital data stream, and the margins for mobile network operators are under constant erosive pressure... http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2015-03/mobile.html -- colin
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:57:14 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestsubmissions.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: New FCC rules are not a federal takeover Message-ID: <md9ubh$vg1$1@dont-email.me> New FCC rules are not a federal takeover The Federal Communications Commission's controversial "net neutrality" rules, approved 3-2 last week, were met with predictable howls of outrage. Verizon, claiming the FCC was imposing "1930s rules on the Internet," went so far as to issue a typewritten news release dated Feb. 26, 1934. Cute, but hardly convincing. The net neutrality rules are many things. What they are not is a federal takeover, or government censorship or, as some critics put it, Obamacare for the Internet. http://www.livingstondaily.com/story/opinion/readers/2015/03/03/new-fcc-rules-federal-takeover/24285745/ -or- http://goo.gl/MGjV7Q -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:50:09 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestsubmissions.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: How Comcast, Verizon, and the Rest of Big Telecom Blew the Net-Neutrality Battle Message-ID: <md9tu7$t59$1@dont-email.me> by Rob Pegoraro Last Thursday's vote by the Federal Communications Commission to enact sweeping net neutrality regulations represented almost a 180-degree turnaround from a year ago. Back then, a federal court struck down a timid set of net neutrality rules, and the FCC responded by preparing still weaker regulations. What happened between then and now? Much of the credit for this reversal goes to millions of Americans who got mad and let Washington know about it. The White House took note - in November, President Obama asked the FCC to return to treating Internet providers as "common carrier" utilities - and in January, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler surprised many by saying the commission would do just that. https://www.yahoo.com/tech/how-comcast-verizon-and-the-rest-of-big-telecom-112519949724.html -or- http://goo.gl/FtiAf7 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:01:33 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestsubmissions.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Comcast and AT&T might not sue FCC after all Message-ID: <md9ujl$117$1@dont-email.me> Why Comcast, AT&T and other Internet providers might not sue the FCC after all by Brian Fung Internet providers are widely expected to sue the Federal Communications Commission to overturn the agency's new net neutrality rules. Who will fire the opening salvo, and when, is becoming the subject of a new Washington parlor game - at least until the rules are actually published. But will the country's biggest broadband companies be part of the mix? That's the question facing companies such as Comcast and AT&T even as they're hoping those same federal regulators approve a set of multibillion-dollar mega-mergers. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/03/why-comcast-att-and-other-internet-providers-might-not-sue-the-fcc-after-all/ -or- http://goo.gl/S7jyfk -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne.

The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright © 2015 E. William Horne. All rights reserved.


Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself. Thank you!

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.


End of The Telecom Digest (4 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues