|
Message Digest
Volume 28 : Issue 333 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Is there a better way to prevent spam? [NFP]
====== 28 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.
===========================
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime. Geoffrey Welsh
===========================
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:38:20 -0500
From: Telecom digest moderator <telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org>
To: redacted@invalid.telecom.csail.mit.edu
Subject: Is there a better way to prevent spam? [NFP]
Message-ID: <20091218183820.GA25158@telecom.csail.mit.edu>
Since my surgeries, I've been looking for ways to simplify and improve
the Telecom Digest work flow, and I'd appreciate the readers' help
with this question. I'd like to hear ideas as to ways we can improve
the anti-spam measures here at The Digest.
Sorting "ham" from spam emails on the input queues is going well:
we've had good results with the current practice of putting
"" (or "[Obfuscate]" or "[Anonymous]" or "[NFP]" {Not for
publication}) in the subject lines, but that method doesn't work for
new posters, and is also error-prone because existing contributors
often forget to include it, so I have to check the spam folders
regularly.
I've been obfuscating and/or removing all the digest's "real" email
addresses from Usenet posts, and although that makes it harder for new
contributors to join, I feel it's essential to keep the spam count
low: the old addresses received upwards of 500 spam emails per day,
and now we're down below ten. This raises the question of how best to
publicize the address that new contributors should use to send in
their first post:
1. I could include a human-readable form of the address as a
postscript on all posts, once per month or so.
2. I could refer posters to a web page containing the info.
3. I might ask new posters to use something like Google Groups.
I favor option (1), because the others require web access, and some
companies don't allow employees to use the web. Are there other ways
to go about it?
The two bastions of spam-prevention, i.e., keywords in subject lines
and hiding submission addresses, are working well, but I need to know
if they're TOO effective. What do you think?
--
Bill Horne
Moderator
telecomdigestmoderator atsign telecom-digest tod org
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom-
munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.
TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.
The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
781-784-7287
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then. Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!
URL information: http://telecom-digest.org
Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list.
All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.
End of The Telecom digest (1 message)
|