30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for October 27, 2011
Volume 30 : Issue 273 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Ars Technica accuses AT&T of buying support for the T-Mobile purchase (Bill Horne)
Screen Time Higher Than Ever for Children (Monty Solomon)
A quizzical response to the new bar codes (Monty Solomon)
Re: A quizzical response to the new bar codes (daryl.gibson@gmail.com)
Re: Edison's powrer network (Was Re: Telegraph turns 150 (Michael Moroney)
Re: Edison's power network (Was Re: Telegraph turns 150 (Wes Leatherock)
Re: UPDATE: Steven VanRoekel, CIO of the USA, speaks at Xerox PARC (Thad Floryan)
Re: Hard-of-hearing phones (Was: dugout telephones (Wes Leatherock)
Re: Edison's power network (Quinn, Michael J.)
Re: dugout phones--the plot thickens (Geoffrey Welsh)
Re: dugout telephones (Robert Bonomi)

====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:46:48 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Ars Technica accuses AT&T of buying support for the T-Mobile purchase Message-ID: <CAFY5RQJXO68oimZO38czJBdZJJUMtDX97QSKQDY=C9Vbhv94pg@mail.gmail.com> Ars Technica has an article that says AT&T is paying donations to multiple charitable organizations who support it's purchase of T-Mobile. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/10/into-the-depths-of-atts-let-us-buy-t-mobile-astroturf-campaign.ars Bill (Remove QRM from my email address to write me directly)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:22 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Screen Time Higher Than Ever for Children Message-ID: <p06240831cacd2297c349@[10.0.1.9]> Screen Time Higher Than Ever for Children By TAMAR LEWIN October 25, 2011 Jaden Lender, 3, sings along softly with the "Five Little Monkeys" app on the family iPad, and waggles his index finger along with the monkey doctor at the warning, "No more monkeys jumping on the bed!" He likes crushing the ants in "Ant Smasher," and improving his swing in the golf app. But he is no app addict: when the one featuring Grover from Sesame Street does not work right, Jaden says, "Come on, iPad!'" - then wanders happily off to play with his train set. "I'll lie to myself that these are skill builders,'" said his father, Keith Lender, who has downloaded dozens of tablet and smart phone apps for Jaden and his 1-year-old brother, Dylan. "No, I'm not lying," he said, correcting himself. "Jaden's really learning hand-eye coordination from the golf game, and it beats the hell out of sitting and watching television." Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics' longstanding recommendations to the contrary, children under 8 are spending more time than ever in front of screens, according to a study scheduled for release Tuesday. The report also documents for the first time an emerging "app gap" in which affluent children are likely to use mobile educational games while those in low-income families are the most likely to have televisions in their bedrooms. The study, by Common Sense Media, a San Francisco nonprofit group, is the first of its kind since apps became widespread, and the first to look at screen time from birth. It found that almost half the families with incomes above $75,000 had downloaded apps specifically for their young children, compared with one in eight of the families earning less than $30,000. More than a third of those low-income parents said they did not know what an "app" - short for application - was. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/us/screen-time-higher-than-ever-for-children-study-finds.html ***** Moderator's Note ***** I'll bet there's an app that tells ipod users that their kids are using too many apps. I'll bet there's an app that reveals I and my brother spent too much time outdoors playing with wooden guns when we kids, and predicting that we'd all be serial killers because we weren't being exposed to the educational material available on TV. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:04:43 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: A quizzical response to the new bar codes Message-ID: <p0624083bcacd37068d2c@[10.0.1.9]> A quizzical response to the new bar codes By Beth Teitell Globe Staff / October 8, 2011 Katie McLoughlin, a hip South End resident, was strolling Newbury Street when she saw something she'd never noticed: a square piece of paper with a black and white pattern, posted on a real estate billboard. It's the kind of thing that is popping up regularly these days, but what, exactly, is it? "A reincarnation of those magic eye puzzles from the '90s - you cross your eyes and the image pops out?'' guessed McLoughlin, 27. She took another look, and admitted defeat. "I have no idea.'' The answer: a kind of bar code known as Quick Response. Scan one with your phone, and you can get additional product information, watch an exclusive video, win a prize, or, in the case of Group Boston Real Estate's QR code, learn square-footage and condo-fee numbers for advertised properties. QR codes have quickly become the darling of the mobile marketing world. But despite their increasing ubiquity - they have appeared on Taco Bell cups, plants at the Home Depot , and Target toy catalogs- many consumers remain either totally ignorant or baffled. ... http://articles.boston.com/2011-10-08/business/30258392_1_qr-scan-ymca-branch ***** Moderator's Note ***** How is this different than what "Cue-Cat" tried to do? Does anyone remember Cue-Cat? Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:36:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "daryl.gibson@gmail.com" <daryl.gibson@gmail.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: A quizzical response to the new bar codes Message-ID: <6b061073-1740-4fbf-ac1e-6ead801f16c2@p14g2000pra.googlegroups.com> > How is this different than what "Cue-Cat" tried to do? Does anyone > remember Cue-Cat? > > Bill Horne > Moderator There have been a number of companies that that have tried such things. Cue-cat was one, [and] Panasonic tried to get barcodes on TV listings (hardly anyone did it) in order to make programming VCRs easier for the dolts. Modern 2D barcodes can contain a lot of information, including maps locations, contact information, network information, URLs, telephone numbers, and free text of any type. They can be created by anyone, from multiple online sources. QR code readers are available from a number of sources for smart phones, and creating them is simple. Try it yourself: http://zxing.appspot.com/generator/
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:08:18 +0000 (UTC) From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Edison's powrer network (Was Re: Telegraph turns 150 Message-ID: <j87tj2$703$1@pcls6.std.com> >***** Moderator's Note ***** >I meant "system", but it was a network in the sense that any >commercial company needs to have a combination of people, plan, and >ability that makes it into a "network" of commercial interests. >I know that Edison didn't envision a power grid: he once said that the >only way to move electricity from city to city was to charge batteries >and load them onto railroad flatcars. My point was that he used the >same voltage he was familiar with from his days as a telegrapher, and >we in the U.S. are still using it, although it has been converted to AC. >Bill Horne >Moderator The voltage has been bumped a little since Edison. The nominal voltage was raised to 115V in the 30s or thereabouts, and when I was dissecting radios as a youth they were all rated at 117 volts, and these days, everything is rated for 120V. Edison outright hated AC, to the point where he couldn't see how AC would be a better choice for an electricity system. Edison would have had a world with smallish (DC) power plants on every block. I suppose Edison gets the last laugh, with the modern systems for transmitting power for very long distances being high voltage DC. ***** Moderator's Note ***** I think it's the Amish who get the last laugh: the economy has made everyone conscious of the cost of leaving lights on and depending on electricity for too many things in too many places. The idea of getting up with the sun and lighting my house with one or two lanterns seems a lot more sensible to me now. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:52:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Leatherock <wleathus@yahoo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Edison's power network (Was Re: Telegraph turns 150 Message-ID: <1319640764.82018.YahooMailClassic@web111719.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> --- On Tue, 10/25/11, Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: > Edison outright hated AC, to the point where he couldn't see how AC > would be a better choice for an electricity system. Edison would > have had a world with smallish (DC) power plants on every block. > > I suppose Edison gets the last laugh, with the modern systems for > transmitting power for very long distances being high voltage DC. But that high voltage D.C. can only by created in practice by using Tesla's A.C. to raise the voltage that high, and then rectifying it back to D.C. Wes Leatherock wleathus@yahoo.com wesrock@aol.com ***** Moderator's Note ***** Yes, that's true, of course, but it's not the point. Edison, who was the prototypical self-promoting hustler, was apoplectic that Tesla's invention was more so much more useful and practical than his. In other words, Edison hated Tesla because Alternating Current threatened, at least in Edison's mind, his status as the "Wizard of Menlo Park" and the public view of him as the preeminent inventor of the time. Edison was also spiteful about Bell's "Phongraph spelled backwards Gramaphone", which was Edison's competition in the recorded music business, even though Bell's invention was markedly superior in tone quality. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:56:24 -0700 From: Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: UPDATE: Steven VanRoekel, CIO of the USA, speaks at Xerox PARC Message-ID: <4EA80378.5070506@thadlabs.com> On 10/24/2011 3:34 PM, Thad Floryan wrote: > On 10/24/2011 2:56 AM, Thad Floryan wrote: >> " Don't miss this opportunity to hear and interact with Steven VanRoekel, >> " the Chief Information Officer of the United States, in his first public >> " appearance since his appointment by President Barack Obama in August 2011. >> " VanRoekel, who has been a visionary leader at Microsoft and the FCC, will >> " share his priorities for the Federal IT landscape and his vision for how >> " technology can enable the government to do more for the American people, >> " even as we face constrained resources. >> >> Details of the free meeting at Xerox PARC in Palo Alto CA are here: >> >> >> http://www.parc.com/event/1613/evening-with-steven-vanroekel.html >> >> [...] A reasonably complete report of the material that was discussed can be read here (appeared online at 4am PDT) though the meeting place was incorrectly stated -- it was at Xerox PARC in Palo Alto CA whereas the Churchill Club is in San Jose CA: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/25/BU901LM2BG.DTL The first several paragraphs are: " The nation's top technology official on Tuesday unveiled a "future " first" strategy designed to minimize the delays that routinely " sentence government technology projects to early obsolescence. " " In an interview, federal Chief Information Officer Steven VanRoekel " said the plan centers on building small applications that can be " quickly and cheaply plugged in and upgraded. " " For example, in the past the federal government would take years and " spend hundred of millions to install one broad software package " covering every aspect of financial management. Going forward, it's " more likely to rapidly put in place separate ledger, auditing and " payroll components that can be updated or replaced independently, but " work together seamlessly. " " "The hope is that the future of government is modular and future- " ready," VanRoekel said. "The government really needs to switch " to lean startup mode." " " VanRoekel was set to present the strategy, which he believes will make " the federal government more efficient, nimble and cost effective, " Tuesday night in a keynote address at the Churchill Club in Palo Alto. " " The critical problem with the old approach is that systems often " arrive over budget, past deadline and deeply flawed. " " "We have many cases where these long, very expensive projects are " obsolete by the time you're done," he said. " " Famously, the FBI's Virtual Case File initiative, an effort to bring " the agency's antiquated case-tracking systems into the 21st century, " took $170 million and five years to build. In the end, it was so buggy " and unusable that the system was scrapped. { article continues at the above SFGate URL }
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Leatherock <wleathus@yahoo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Hard-of-hearing phones (Was: dugout telephones Message-ID: <1319640041.71612.YahooMailClassic@web111712.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> --- On Tue, 10/25/11, HAncock4 <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> wrote: > Because of noise, it may be helpful to have volume control handsets. > These have been available since the 1950s and easily available > today. The standard telephone set ringer is pretty loud on its > highest setting, but they also make extra loud auxillary ringers > (gas stations and school gyms used to have them). An anecdote that might be of interest here, as related to me by the telco wire chief in Bartlesville, Okla., which also was the headquarters of Phillips Petroleum Company. The Bell Labs, in the 1930s or 1940s, announced they had invented a phone with variable volume, especially for use of people with diminished hearing. Frank Phillips, CEO of Phillips Petroleum, was partially deaf. He called the wire chief (whose name I now forget), showed him the announcement and said he wanted such a phone. (in a small town like Bartlesville, dominated by Phillips, Frank often called the wire chief directly and the wire chief often worked in Frank's office.) Anyway, the wire chief sent word up through the lines, calling attention to the customer who wanted the phone. He kept getting no encouraging respose, and Mr. Phillips asked if [it] would help if the called the president and CEO of AT&T, with whom he was, of course, on a first name basis. The wire chief asked him to hold off for now and he would make another try. The wire chief of course sent word up the line as to what Frank proposed to do. He heard nothing for severeal weeks and then a plain brown package arrived from the Labs, containing such a phone and a hand-drawn wiring diagram. He waited a week or two, expecting to hear from state headquarters about it and the pricing, but he heard nothing and decided he wan't going to. So he went to Mr. Phillips's office and installed it, to Mr. Phillips's great appreciation. He never heard anything further, and decided what they sent him was the prototype that was extolled in the media. Wes Leatherock wleathus@yahoo.com wesrock@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:16:06 +0000 From: "Quinn, Michael J." <mquinn@mitre.org> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Edison's power network Message-ID: <5E50D6DF9C4E074CA597625E527A0540018561@IMCMBX02.MITRE.ORG> For an interesting description of the competition between AC and DC, I heartily recommend "Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World" by Jill Jonnes. Mike Quinn Springfield VA
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:01:10 -0400 From: "Geoffrey Welsh" <gwelsh@spamcop.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: dugout phones--the plot thickens Message-ID: <a502d$4ea89136$adce93f1$28498@PRIMUS.CA> Curt Bramblett wrote: > Seems that the bullpen did not hear St. Louis' manager's call for > another pitcher. Twice! So how hard is it to get phones that can be > heard above the noise? I've seen several phones with lights that flash when ringing... surely that would help and could have been included. In an open space like a bullpen, you could put multiple lights so that one would be visible no matter what direction one was facing.
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:25:06 -0500 From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: dugout telephones Message-ID: <Er6dnbM6zeZPKDrTnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications> In article <ee69ebd7-1061-4fc1-9888-c3c3e8285c08@g7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>, HAncock4 <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> wrote: >On Oct 24, 10:25 am, Curt Bramblett <CurtBramblett.remove-t...@and- >this-too.cfl.rr.com> wrote: >> Can someone here add some insight to this: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/5wfr6mk >> ... > >"Eric Gagne, then the closer for the Los Angeles Dodgers, made the >dugout phone at Pac Bell Park in San Francisco an outlet for his >frustrations, snapping the cord in half while swiping at the receiver >and in the process earning himself a $500 repair bill from the Giants. >" > >How does a cut cord and broken handset cost $500 to repair? Did you see anything that said he was only charged the 'cost' of repair? grin I'm willing to bet that the bill includes a substantial mark-up, to serve as a 'deterrent' against a repeat of the behavior. >Anyway, I would think such dugout phones would be part of the >stadium's PBX, with a restriction against making outside calls (a >standard long time PBX feature). What you 'would think' is very likely incorrect. I cannot speak with regard to every baseball facility, but the ones I have been in, the phones are simple "hot ringdown" pairs. This requires little more than 'talk battery', a ring generator, and a few relays. >I've seen pictures of dugouts and there were often two wall phones. One to the bull-pen, the other to the 'observer' in the press box. >Phone service would be necessary not only to call the bullpen, but >also stadium security, stadium management offices, team management >offices, the locker room, PA announcer, and first-aid. Stadium security has their own people close at hand. who are 'radio equipped'. If medical services are needed, security will do the summoning. If stadium management is needed, security -- who works for the stadium -- con summon them. Similarly, stadium operations staff are close to hand, and can summon their management if/when needed. Generally, however, the 'decision maker' for anything of a stadium operations nature is close to hand. During a game, the visiting team is 'not able' to talk to their team management office -- if they needed to talk to 'management' that is not up in the press box -- that is, and, therefore, the home team can't do it either. >(Actually, I would think such phones should have outside capability >in case of an emergency; I'm surprised league regulations would >prohibit it.) I'm surprised that you're surprised. <grin> "Outside" communications are forbidden by league policy, to prevent "cheating", i.e., to prevent the possibility that it might APPEAR that someone could be cheating. There is no need for outside communications, from_the_dugout in an emergency. 'Emergency' communications are Security's responsibility. >Because of noise, it may be helpful to have volume control handsets. >These have been available since the 1950s and easily available today. >The standard telephone set ringer is pretty loud on its highest >setting, A standard phone ringer is laughably inadequate, given the crowd-noise levels at most team-based sports events >but they also make extra loud auxillary ringers (gas stations and >school gyms used to have them). A necessity, in that environment, hopefully supplemented by a _visible_ indicator.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
863-455-9426
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2011 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (11 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues