31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981Add this Digest to your personal or   The Telecom Digest for October 6, 2012
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ====== | ||||||||
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest. |
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:10:15 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Former Verizon Wireless engineer sentenced on fraud scheme Message-ID: <k4n7q8$r7b$1@dont-email.me> Former Verizon Wireless engineer sentenced on fraud scheme An FBI press release dated Oct. 3, 2012 announced that Michael W. Baxter, 62, of Ball Ground, Georgia, was sentenced today by Senior United States District Judge J. Owen Forrester to serve four years in federal prison on charges of wire fraud in connection with a scheme to steal millions of dollars in high-value network communications equipment from Cisco Systems Inc. and his employer, Verizon Wireless, while employed as a network engineer for Verizon between 2000 and 2010. October 5, 2012 by Joel Hendon http://www.examiner.com/article/former-verizon-wireless-engineer-sentenced-on-fraud-scheme -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:03:13 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: T-Mobile USA's value down $13 billion since failed AT&T deal Message-ID: <k4n7d0$l1d$1@dont-email.me> T-Mobile USA's value down $13 billion since failed AT&T deal By CORNELIUS RAHN & JOSEPH DE WECK Bloomberg News Published: 10/5/2012 1:48 AM Last Modified: 10/5/2012 4:57 AM Deutsche Telekom AG's agreement to merge T-Mobile USA with MetroPCS Communications Inc. reveals how the value of its T-Mobile unit may have dropped by $13 billion amid client losses following a failed sale to AT&T Inc. last year. http://www.tulsaworld.com/business/article.aspx?subjectid=52&articleid=20121005_52_E3_ULNSoi571908 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: 5 Oct 2012 13:35:01 -0500 From: "Paul W. Schleck" <pschleck@novia.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: AT&T Deploys More Fuel Cells in its Sites Message-ID: <506f27f3$0$97799$540ea2cf@novia.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In <k4l8ar$5mf$1@dont-email.me> Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> writes: >Bloom Energy continues to gain traction for its fuel cell technology >with major data center operators. AT&T said today that it will purchase >an additional 9.6 megawatts of fuel cell capacity, which will make it >Bloom Energy's largest non-utility customer. I saw the 60 Minutes piece on this company (Bloom Energy) and its fuel cell technology back in 2010: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-6221135.html and have a couple of observations and questions: - The physics/thermodynamics/engineering behind fuel cells are well-established. They aren't trying to exceed known science, or do some sneaky end-run around limits, or even present something that's not reproducible. So that's ruled out as an obvious rebuttal. - Past limitations of fuel cells include the need to fabricate plates from expensive precious metals (platinum, palladium), run at very high temperatures, use a relatively pure and expensive fuel source such as Hydrogen, as well as engineer something that will be reliable over the required decades-long service life to recover investment. - Like solar panels, the return-on-investment is measured over decades, extremely vulnerable to failure of expensive components well before that required long service life, and distorted by heavy government subsidies. - Using natural gas to generate a significant amount of U.S. electrical demands (versus the present mostly hydro/coal/nuclear) may run up the prices of natural gas and further extend or even eliminate a finite return-on-investment timeline. Are other alternatives like biomass-sourced methane realistic? - Is this really carbon-neutral? What are the impact on emissions, particularly emissions-sensitive regions of the country such as California? - There's clearly a generous dollop of IPO hype over all of this, including "Appeals to Authority" testimonials by Arnold Schwarzenegger, Colin Powell, etc. Also, what are early customers like eBay, Google, AT&T, etc., getting out of this? - How probable is it that a small company developed revolutionary breakthroughs overlooked by GE, Siemens, Phillips, and other companies with decades (or even century+) long experience with power generation? The "David and Goliath" narrative sounds nice, and is used often in the computer industry (e.g., HP declining to follow up on the technologies that Apple later ran with), but is sometimes overused in contexts where it is not completely credible. One expert interviewed for the 60 Minutes piece estimated that there is about a 20% chance this will wind up in people's homes in 10 years, and if so, it will say "GE" on it. In short, how unique is their proprietary "secret sauce" in this, and could it be easily reverse-engineered by GE, Siemens, Phillips, etc., either bringing different patents to the table, or just waiting out the Bloom Box patents and overtaking the market with something of their own? - -- Paul W. Schleck pschleck@novia.net http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger pschleck@novia.net for PGP Public Key iEYEARECAAYFAlBvJ7YACgkQ6Pj0az779o46/ACgrVaRImyCEAdOYCBH6xkeY4ww BjIAniG/wJsRh83HRoW1opIB9qqMmh3q =aiYU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: |
Bill Horne Telecom Digest 43 Deerfield Road Sharon MA 02067-2301 339-364-8487 bill at horne dot net |
Subscribe: | telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom |
Unsubscribe: | telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom |
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.