32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981Add this Digest to your personal or   The Telecom Digest for October 25, 2013
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ====== | ||||||||||||
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest. |
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:22:57 +0000 (UTC) From: wollman@bimajority.org (Garrett Wollman) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: AT&T bulks up its bankroll in tower deal Message-ID: <l47feh$1i45$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu> In article <20131023000204.GA26566@telecom.csail.mit.edu>, Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> wrote: >The agreement, which involves leasing or selling 9,700 wireless towers >to Crown Castle, makes AT&T the latest carrier to offload antenna >sites to independent operators -- a transaction that lets the company >focus on growth areas or more profitable parts of the business. This trend has been going on for a very long time in retail, and for about the past two decades in radio. There are a number of companies out there that function effectively as investment bankers for real estate, enabling property owners to free up capital in exchange for a long-term lease on the property. Crown Castle was one of the early players in this business, acquiring a large number of broadcast transmitter sites in the UK as the BBC and independent stations sold off their transmission facilities. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) From: HAncock4 <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Verizon will wield a scalpel at healthcare.gov Message-ID: <d340fa99-769b-4870-b8d3-ae58cab7fa3f@googlegroups.com> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:22:11 PM UTC-4, Bill Horne wrote: > An informed source in the telecommunications industry said Verizon's > Enterprise Solutions division has been asked by the Department of > Health and Human Services to improve the performance of the > HealthCare.gov site, which is a key component of the Affordable Care > Act. The Washington Post had a detailed article describing the software issues: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/24/everything-you-need-to-know-about-obamacares-problems/?hpid=z2
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:46:10 -0400 From: T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Verizon will wield a scalpel at healthcare.gov Message-ID: <MPG.2cd1810cc004b380989ef2@news.eternal-september.org> In article <20131023002211.GA29679@telecom.csail.mit.edu>, bill@horneQRM.net says... > > HHS brings in Verizon to help HealthCare.gov > > Alistair Barr, Kelly Kennedy and Jayne O'Donnell, USA TODAY 8:22 a.m. EDT October 22, 2013 > > WASHINGTON . The international telecommunications company Verizon has > been tasked with helping the government fix the federal health > exchange, USA TODAY has learned. > > An informed source in the telecommunications industry said Verizon's > Enterprise Solutions division has been asked by the Department of > Health and Human Services to improve the performance of the > HealthCare.gov site, which is a key component of the Affordable Care > Act. The source spoke on condition of anonymity because the > announcement had not been made official. > > > http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/21/verizon-hhs-healthcare-site-fix/3144761/ > Oh this should be good! This is the same Verizon who is blocking our attempts at a Boston to AZ data connection. The main carrier is old mother Bell of course. But she can't get her child to act any faster.
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:52:41 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: OS X 10.9 Mavericks: The Ars Technica Review Message-ID: <p0624080ece8e49c025ef@[10.0.1.8]> OS X 10.9 Mavericks: The Ars Technica Review No longer an apex predator, OS X takes some time for introspection. by John Siracusa Oct 22 2013 Ars Technica After a dozen years and nine major releases, OS X has had a full life: the exuberance of youth, gradually maturing into adulthood, and now, perhaps, entering its dotage. When I am an old operating system I shall wear ... leather? The 2011 release of OS X 10.7 Lion seemed to mark the natural endpoint of the "big cat" naming scheme. But Apple couldn't resist the lure of the "cat, modifier cat" naming pattern, releasing OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion a year later. Perhaps it just wanted to give its cat nine lives. The 10th major release, OS X 10.9 Mavericks, is named after an awkwardly plural California surfing spot, finally ending the feline dynasty. But what part of the operating system's existence is this? The afterlife? ... http://arstechnica.com/apple/2013/10/os-x-10-9/
Date: 24 Oct 2013 10:06:21 -0400 From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Canada to propose forcing a la carte programming Message-ID: <l4b9gt$59p$1@panix2.panix.com> Neal McLain <nmclain.remove-this@and-this-too.annsgarden.com> wrote: > >It will be fascinating to find out how much ESPN will have to charge as a retail product. No, no, it will be fascinating to find out how much ESPN will be ABLE to charge as a retail product. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: |
Bill Horne Telecom Digest 43 Deerfield Road Sharon MA 02067-2301 339-364-8487 bill at horne dot net |
Subscribe: | telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom |
Unsubscribe: | telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom |
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.