The Telecom Digest | ||
---|---|---|
Copyright © 2022 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved. |
Message-ID: <20220908164443.GA270962@telecomdigest.us>
Date: 8 Sep 2022 16:44:43 +0000
From: Bill Horne <malassimiQRMlation@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: My VoIP phone is dead
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:49:48PM +0000, Bill Horne wrote:
> My callcentric VoIP phone stopped working yesterday, and it's still out.
>
> Yesterday (Sunday, 9/4), my VoIP phone went dead. It's a three line
> phone, and there are two VoIP services I use it for: Callcentric,
> where I get my "home" phone number, and the Hamshack Hotline, a free
> VoIP service for Amateur Radio operators like me. They both quit at
> the same time.
Yesterday (Wednesday, 9/7), I got a call from someone at "Galaxy
Cablevision," and he told me that my VoIP lines are out-of-service
because of "Cee-Gee NAT." He did his best to convince me that the
ports used for the "new" Internet layout that my local cable company
is using can't be "mapped" to my VoIP phone, and that there was
nothing he could do about the problem.
I did my best to explain to him that I used to be a Certified NetWare
Engineer™, and that I have been the Moderator of the Telecom Digest
for about fifteen years, and that my job gives me extraordinary access
to world-class experts on the subject of Network Address Translation,
the TCP three-way handshake, and VoIP in general, and that there was
no "port mapping" involved. I told him that I didn't need any ports
mapped, and that such capability wasn't what I had sought after.
He told me that my problem would be solved by a "Fixed IP Address,"
but when I advised him that I wasn't interested in paying for a
capability which isn't guaranteed to solve the problem, he said he'd
do some more research and get back to me.
So, I'd appreciate your help: please point me to a source of
easy-to-understand information about current VoIP practice, especially
as it relates to NAT of any flavor, and let me thank you in advance
for your help. I'd also like to know if there are more current
versions of the story about being born at night in the back of a
turnip truck, since I'd like to have answers ready if and when someone
at Galaxy Cablevision calls me again.
Bill Horne
P.S. I'll also call Alexis Rosen at Panix, and ask if he can support
the "OpenVPN" capability of my ASUS router. Here's hoping ...
--
(Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me diretly)
Message-ID: <20220908155520.GA270539@telecomdigest.us> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:55:20 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malassimiQRMlation@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FCC Does The Bare Minimum: Asks Wireless Carriers To Be Honest About Location Data >From the "Slopping the Hogs" department, which is the way that former Congressman Barney Frank used to refer to his biennial efforts at sincerity ... Our electred representatives have ordered the FCC to do its best to create an intimation of the vague posibility of further exploration of the chances for them to start doing their duty. It's time for another election, which is when our public servants go around promising the Message-ID: <20220908162018.GA270920@telecomdigest.us> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:20:18 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malassimiQRMlation@gmail.com> Subject: Verizon's Small Business Survey finds inflation and supply chain top concerns BASKING RIDGE, N.J. - Verizon Business today released findings from its third annual State of Small Business Survey, conducted by Morning Consult. With responses from more than 600 small and midsize busi- nesses, the data shows that challenges such as inflation, labor and the U.S. economy are top concerns. Despite this, businesses remain upbeat regarding their future, with 56% of small and midsize busi- nesses believing they will be better a year from now than they are today. Other areas of concern include cybersecurity and businesses' outlook for the 2022 holiday season. https://tinyurl.com/2p9fvf7p Message-ID: <20220908161605.GA270776@telecomdigest.us> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:16:05 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malassimiQRMlation@gmail.com> Subject: Multiple Layers Of TCPA Defense Remain Important After Duguid By Matt Knowles , Saba Bajwa and Amy C. Pimentel The Supreme Court's 2021 decision in Facebook v. Duguid1 changed the landscape of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation. For years prior, aggressive plaintiffs had stretched the TCPA's antiquated language defining automatic telephone dialing systems (ATDS) well beyond its breaking point. The ATDS definition is critical, as use of an ATDS triggers consent requirements under Section 227(b) of the TCPA and failure to comply can result in catastrophic liability. Duguid emphasized that Congress meant what it said in defining an ATDS, and its definition must be applied as written. An ATDS is defined as "equipment which has the capacity - (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers." The Supreme Court held that the phrase "using a random or sequential number generator" was meant to qualify the entire preceding phrase, such that an automatic dialing system must use random or sequential number generators to either store or produce telephone numbers in order to qualify as an ATDS. https://tinyurl.com/2p8nr4ad |
Helpful Links | |
---|---|
Telecom Digest Archives | The Telecom Digest FAQ |