Message-ID: <sst0kt$7cf$5@dont-email.me>
Date: 26 Jan 2022 21:39:29 -0500
From: "Michael Trew" <michael.trew@att.net>
Subject: Verizon adds 78K fixed wireless subs in Q4 as Fios
broadband growth slows
FWA subs coming from cable and DSL areas
FWA serves as the "the primary broadband solution" for those customers,
which also represent new broadband customers for Verizon and, in some
instances, new mobile customers, Vestberg said.
"I think that's our sweet spot right now, when we're a national
broadband provider," he said, noting that Verizon's FWA subs have been
coming from both cable and DSL service areas.
https://www.lightreading.com/5g/verizon-adds-78k-fixed-wireless-subs-in-q4-as-fios-broadband-growth-slows-/d/d-id/774817
Message-ID: <f3bc8a80-9e1c-596a-ce0a-e3bfbf5f6be6@gmail.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2022 15:52:19 -0500
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: D.C. Circuit Allows FCC To Open 6 GHz Band For Unlicensed
Use
by Brian D. Weimer , Imad S. Matini and Amanda Witt
On December 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
affirmed the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC's" or
"Commission's") authority to permit unlicensed wireless devices, such as
internet routers, smart phones, and laptops, to operate in the 6 GHz band.
In AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC
<https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-1190/20-1190-202=
1-12-28.pdf?ts=3D1640709153>,
the three-judge panel rejected 6 GHz incumbent licensees' arguments that
allowing such users to operate inside the band would cause undue
interference with preexisting users, but remanded the First Report and
Order
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-164A1.pdf>=C2=A0("Order") to
the FCC on one limited issue. As a result of the Order, the Commission
promises stronger and more expansive and cost-effective Wi-Fi networks
for consumers and minimal effects on incumbents.
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/telecoms-mobile-cable-communications/1153122/dc-circuit-allows-fcc-to-open-6-ghz-band-for-unlicensed-use?email_access=on
Message-ID: <29cc60de-df3c-4d52-ad89-93d6f5d9d353@gmail.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2022 16:02:24 -0500
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: Second Circuit Rules Faxed Invitation Is Not 'Unsolicited
Advertisement' Under TCPA
By Christopher R. Murphy and Travis Sabalewski
Highlights
* Less than a year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court in /Facebook v. Duguid
/dealt a significant blow to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
(TCPA) plaintiff's bar, when it adopted a narrow interpretation of
the term automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS).
* On Jan. 6, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
dealt another blow in /Bruce Katz MD PC v. Focus Forward LLC/. The
court found that an unsolicited faxed invitation to participate in a
market research survey in exchange for money does not constitute an
"unsolicited advertisement" as defined by the TCPA.
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/advertising-marketing-branding/1153004/second-circuit-rules-faxed-invitation-is-not-39unsolicited-advertisement39-under-tcpa?email_access=on
