31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for June 4, 2013
Volume 32 : Issue 121 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? (Neal McLain)
Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? (Mark Smith)
Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? (Retired)
Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? (Dave Garland)
Bugging telephones in 1955 (Dave Garland)
Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? (tlvp)

====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh


See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.


Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <nmclain.remove-this@and-this-too.annsgarden.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? Message-ID: <435000d0-caaa-437a-825a-0f32fd696341@m8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> I haven't noticed any unusual usage, but I probably wouldn't notice it even if it happened. I maintain two Tracfone accounts, each one renewed annually for $100/year including 400 minutes plus 400 bonus. Neither phone uses anywhere near 800 minutes per year, so rollover minutes just keep piling up. As of today, my wife's phone shows >3300 unused minutes, and mine shows >2400. Neal McLain
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 08:33:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Smith <marklsmith@yahoo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? Message-ID: <1370187192.66280.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> On Sunday, June 2, 2013 9:38 AM Frank Stearns <franks.pacifier.com@pacifier.net> wrote: > Along with land lines I've had wireless in one form or another for > more than 15 years, initially done as a 1 or 2 year contract; in later > years month-to-month. In the past 18 months I've gone all prepaid. > > For my call patterns (no data, no text) this is wayyyy cheaper. A > US$100/1000 minute, 12 month prepaid from T-mobile typically lasts 6-7 > months. This translates to roughly $16/month, with no additional junk > fees. Contrast this to the most minimal "post-paid" T-Mobile plan of > $30/month, with another $10 in fees and taxes tacked on. > > I also moved recently and ported my old land line number to a cheap > Tracphone prepaid. This account acts as a "place holder" until I can > decide what to do with that old number, which I've had for 30+ years. > > Here's what's odd. With all those years, I know my calling habits > fairly well, both inbound and outbound. It seems that in the past two > months way more wireless minutes are being used than should be the > case, based on 16 months' prior experience with prepaid. The T-mobile > minutes seem to be going by at 1.5x what they should; the Tracphone > minutes seem to disappear at 2x (on a "double minutes" phone -- how > ironic). No one but me has access to these phones. > > Maybe I'm imagining all this or am not accounting for something. But > before I start some elaborate external logging to verify actual usage, > have there been any rumblings about Cellcos attempting to subvert > their prepaid customers? Any rumors or actual cases of Cellcos padding > the meter (or making it run faster) to burn up any extra prepaid time > they can? > > Is there any auditing that takes place, something like the state > Weights and Measures office certifying the accuracy of the pumps at > the corner gasoline station? > > Cellcos no doubt hate users like me, who have noted the unused minutes > each month, switched to prepaid, and cut the gross revenue on the > account (sometimes significantly). If enough folks did this I could > understand Cellco motives to engage in accounting skulduggery. > > Mainly curious if any other prepaid users have sensed something like > this and if so, how they've pursued it. I think Tracfone does whole minute increments, so if you go a second over it costs a minute. Mark L. Smith marklsmith@yahoo.com http://smith.freehosting.net Http://marksfolkmusicphotos.shutterfly.com ________________________________
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:31:05 -0400 From: Retired <Retired@home.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? Message-ID: <yuudnQH7FsokKzHMnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@giganews.com> On 6/2/13 9:38 AM, Frank Stearns wrote: > Along with land lines I've had wireless in one form or another for > more than 15 years, initially done as a 1 or 2 year contract; in > later years month-to-month. In the past 18 months I've gone all > prepaid. > > For my call patterns (no data, no text) this is wayyyy cheaper. A > US$100/1000 minute, 12 month prepaid from T-mobile typically lasts > 6-7 months. This translates to roughly $16/month, with no > additional junk fees. Contrast this to the most minimal "post-paid" > T-Mobile plan of $30/month, with another $10 in fees and taxes tacked > on. > > <snip> I have had the same T-Mobile PrePaid Gold plan as you for 6 years now. Paid the $100/1000min charge one time at start. I make/get about 2 short calls per month ! Usually maintain about 90 minutes/US$20 on the account, making minimum $10 recharges as needed. I have not noticed any issues with the minutes being deducted as used.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:49:05 -0500 From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? Message-ID: <koidl5$fs3$1@dont-email.me> On 6/2/2013 8:38 AM, Frank Stearns wrote: > For my call patterns (no data, no text) this is wayyyy cheaper. A > US$100/1000 minute, 12 month prepaid from T-mobile typically lasts > 6-7 months. This translates to roughly $16/month, with no > additional junk fees. I also use T-Mo prepaid, but I don't use the phone much, it's turned off most of the time. My last $25 lasted a year. > Here's what's odd. With all those years, I know my calling habits > fairly well, both inbound and outbound. It seems that in the past two > months way more wireless minutes are being used than should be the > case, based on 16 months' prior experience with prepaid. The T-mobile > minutes seem to be going by at 1.5x what they should; the Tracphone > minutes seem to disappear at 2x (on a "double minutes" phone -- how > ironic). No one but me has access to these phones. I have not experienced that with my stupidphone. Two things that occur to me are, if it's a smartphone it may be doing things on the network that you don't know about, and especially if you're web browsing. And text messages are pricey (IIRC @$0.25), though the ones from T-Mo are free. I don't do txts. I believe that charges run from the moment you press "call", but think all the carriers do that. > Maybe I'm imagining all this or am not accounting for something. But > before I start some elaborate external logging to verify actual > usage, have there been any rumblings about Cellcos attempting to > subvert their prepaid customers? Any rumors or actual cases of Cellcos > padding the meter (or making it run faster) to burn up any extra > prepaid time they can? You can call to #999# check your balance, or I think you check online if you've registered with T-Mo. While that wouldn't give you "elaborate" data, it would be enough to tell you if charges were occurring during periods that you knew you hadn't used the phone.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:38:35 -0500 From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Bugging telephones in 1955 Message-ID: <koiujv$nng$1@dont-email.me> Top Secret technology of 1955, apparently made obsolete by the introduction of the 500 set. Declassified in 2010. http://cryptome.org/2013/05/ultra-sonic-listening.pdf
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:45:10 -0400 From: tlvp <tPlOvUBpErLeLsEs@hotmail.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Cellco cheating with Prepaid? Message-ID: <kojk37$oi5$1@dont-email.me> Frank Stearns wrote: > Maybe I'm imagining all this or am not accounting for something. But > before I start some elaborate external logging to verify actual > usage, have there been any rumblings about Cellcos attempting to > subvert their prepaid customers? Any rumors or actual cases of Cellcos > padding the meter (or making it run faster) to burn up any extra > prepaid time they can? All I'm aware of is that the time (for your outgoing calls) starts when you press the green "send" button to start the call, and ends once the tower realizes you've pressed the red "end" button to hang up. What with rounding fractional minutes up (to the next full minute), that may be adding an unexpected extra minute to each call you make. Received calls' timers may conceivably start when your first "ring" indication reaches you (rather than when you answer). And RingNoAnswer calls to you, that go to voicemail, probably get both a minute counted for the call attempt itself, and then however many minutes the forwarding to voicemail lasts. Could the above help explain much of your "extra prepaid time"? Cheers, -- tlvp
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org


Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (6 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues