From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Aug 15 15:50:42 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 3B88021D4; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:50:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #301
Message-Id: <20060815195042.3B88021D4@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:50:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:52:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 301

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    How Do You Handle Your Inbox Mail? (Jeffrey Zazlow, Wall Street Journal)
    Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Larry Dignan)
    Philips Bundles Skype, Windows Live VoIP & Cordless Phones (Knowing About)
    Nokia Congratulates Sprint Nextel On Selection Of Wimax (Knowing About)
    Comcast Looking to Expand its Online Presence (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (ranck@vt.edu)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Doug Krause)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:02:05 -0500
From: Jeffrey Zazlow <wsj@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: How Do You Handle Your Inbox Mail?


Hoarders vs. Deleters: How You Handle
Your Email Inbox Says a Lot About You

You are your inbox.

Take a clear-eyed look at how you answer or file each email. Notice
what you choose to keep or delete. Consider your anxiety when your
inbox is jammed with unanswered messages.

The makeup and tidiness of your inbox is a reflection of your habits,
your mental health and, yes, even the way Mom and Dad raised you.

"If you keep your inbox full rather than empty, it may mean you keep
your life cluttered in other ways," says psychologist Dave Greenfield,
who founded the Center for Internet Behavior in West Hartford,
Conn. "Do you cling to the past? Do you have a lot of unfinished
business in your life?"

On the other hand, if you obsessively clean your inbox every 10
minutes, you may be so quick to move on that you miss opportunities
and ignore nuances. Or your compulsion for order may be sapping your
energy from other endeavors, such as your family.

Email addiction, of course, is now a cultural given. But a
less-noticed byproduct of that is the impulse of the inbox. Some of us
are obsessed with moving every email to an appropriate folder while
killing junk "spam" on arrival and making sure Mom knows that we got
her email and still love her. Meanwhile, others among us are
e-procrastinators -- modern-day Scarlett O'Haras who figure we'll deal
with old email tomorrow. We're discovering that the disorder in our
inboxes mirrors the disorder in our homes, marriages and checkbooks.

A few months ago, Scott Stratten was suffering from what he terms
"inbox paralysis." A marketing consultant in Oakville, Ontario, he had
500 old messages in his inbox, all needing responses. "I felt so
guilty, I couldn't even bring myself to open my email," he says.

In desperation, he decided to delete all his messages. He then sent an
email blast to 400 people on his contact list, telling them a lie. He
made up a story that his Internet service provider had informed him
that some emails weren't getting through -- and that was why friends
and clients never heard back from him. "People were very empathetic,"
he says, "and it allowed me to start fresh."

Mr. Stratten describes what he did as "pure evil," but he also calls
it a turning point. He realized he had to find a better way to ease
his guilt over not coming through for people. He is now hiring an
assistant who will handle his email.

Those who are too nice in other areas of their lives may be more
likely to struggle with unwieldy inboxes, says Merlin Mann, creator of
43folders.com, a Web site about personal productivity. Polite people
(or those who want to be liked) feel obliged to participate in
ping-pong correspondences with chatty friends. They haven't the heart
to give anyone the no-response brush-off. But Mr. Mann says such
ruthlessness is necessary.

He says he uses a few dozen "templates" to answer email -- prewritten
form letters in which he inserts a person's name or a personalized
comment. He also empties his inbox hourly. "You have to treat your
inbox like you treat your mailbox at home," he says. "You wouldn't
store your bills inside your mailbox. And leaving spam in your inbox
is like leaving garbage in your kitchen."

On the work front, you're most at risk for inbox clutter if you're the
type who can't say "no," warns Nancy Flynn, executive director of the
ePolicy Institute, a consulting firm. When you're quick to respond
with offers of help, "people use email to turn their crisis into your
emergency," she says.

In Greensboro, N.C., Internet consultant Wally Bock keeps his inbox
down to a manageable few dozen messages. He credits his sense of order
to "having disciplined parents who made that a value." Still, he
recognizes the downside. Many "Inbox Zero" zealots interrupt their
work every time they hear a ping announcing incoming
email. "Multitasking is a misnomer," says Mr. Bock. "What you're
really doing is switching rapidly between tasks. And every time you
switch, you have to start up again.  Over the course of a day, you
lose a chunk of efficiency."

A saner way to pare down an inbox is to move email into folders -- by
subject or need for follow-up -- and once a week set aside time for
inbox housekeeping. That's advice from Marilyn Paul, author of "It's
Hard to Make a Difference When You Can't Find Your Keys," a book for
the chronically disorganized. She also suggests using the inbox
alphabetizing feature, which organizes all email by sender. "That
allows you to delete 1,000 emails an hour," she says.

University of Toronto instructor Christina Cavanagh studied hundreds
of office workers for her book "Managing Your Email: Thinking Outside
the Inbox." One of her subjects, a finance executive, had 10,000
emails in his inbox. She advised him to simply delete the oldest
9,000. Busy people, drowning in email, may have no choice but to kill
old messages and suffer the consequences. (Mr. Mann calls this
"euthanasia.")

Because "inboxes are metaphors for our lives," Dr. Greenfield says,
there's no cure-all solution to inbox management. We're all too
different. But he believes an awareness of our inbox behavior can help
us better understand other areas of our lives.

"If you have 1,000 emails in your inbox, it may mean you don't want to
miss an opportunity, but there are things you can't pull the trigger
on," Dr. Greenfield says. "If you have only 10 emails in your inbox,
you may be pulling the trigger too fast and missing the richness of
life."

Send me the email count in your inbox, and your strategies for coping
with it, to Jeffrey.Zaslow@wsj.com. I'll do a follow-up column with
results -- as soon as I can shovel my way out of my own inbox.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:04:43 -0500
From: Larry Dignan <baseline@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality


by Larry Dignan - Baseline

The network neutrality debate, which is expected to surface again this
fall, is a faux issue that if mandated by Congress is bound to become
a mess. Count me in the camp that Congress do nada about net
neutrality.

"Net neutrality" is a term few can agree on. For Google, Yahoo and
eBay, mandating net neutrality means that telecommunications giants
will have to treat all Internet traffic equally. For net neutrality's
staunchest supporters, the concept has become a quasi censorship issue
(as if Verizon would tell its customers they couldn't use Google). For
those telecom giants like AT&T and Verizon, net neutrality means they
couldn't charge for enhanced services. For Internet users, profiled in
eWEEK this week, the end of net neutrality would be downright scary
because costs could go up or not. Perhaps startups would be shut
out or not. No one knows what will happen, since the debate is
really a fracas between Net and telecom behemoths battling over their
interests and trying to prod Congress to fix a problem that doesn't
exist yet. In other words, the histrionic levels in this debate are
high.

So why shouldn't Congress get involved? Here are a few reasons:

1. Congress will screw it up. If techies can't agree on a definition
of net neutrality, it's highly unlikely that a bunch of pols
understand the issue. Let's say Congress does mandate net
neutrality. Great news, right? Not so fast. Once net neutrality is
mandated, the laws of unintended consequences kick in. Suddenly, we're
locked into a Net architecture (the current one that's decades
old). Suddenly, there are no fast lanes allowed. Suddenly, entrenched
players become more entrenched into the current setup. Is it possible
Congress could mandate net neutrality in a way that would allay all
these concerns? Sure, but it's unlikely. In fact, the only consensus
on the net neutrality issue is that no one thinks Congress has a clue.

2. Fast lanes exist today. Proponents of mandating net neutrality
cringe at the concept of tiered services. However, tiered services
exist today.  Fast lanes exist today. Case in point: Akamai. If you
are a big Web content provider such as Google, Yahoo or CNN, you can
afford to use Akamai's services, which house content in places near
the end users. If you are a startup, you may not be able to use
Akamai. Take it one step further: If Congress says there's no fast
lane, does that mean Akamai can't exist? Hmm.

3. All traffic isn't created equal. An e-mail doesn't have the same
service requirements as a VOIP call. An X-ray of a heart patient
should have priority over a Britney Spears video. Corporate networks
manage traffic that way, and at some point there has to be some
intelligence added to public Internet infrastructure between the end
points. Net neutrality requirements mean all traffic is created
equal. You can debate over who makes the call over what traffic gets
priority, but to pretend all traffic is equal doesn't hold up.

4. Telecom giants are already doomed. So net neutrality disappears and
AT&T and Verizon can theoretically do whatever they want. AT&T gets
huffy and blocks Google and YouTube because it taxes Ma Bell's
infrastructure. Guess what? Customers leave. Sure, AT&T and Verizon
wield a lot of power, but it's more tenuous than you'd think. For
starters, telecom giants are in no position to censor traffic.

Meanwhile, technology is going to pull an end run on the last-mile
issue. Sprint is rolling out WiMax and Clearwire has hefty financial
backers. Both will succeed. Don't buy that argument? How about this
one: If net neutrality ends, the likes of Google and Yahoo could start
charging AT&T and Verizon to carry them on their networks. Why
couldn't Google charge network operators just like ESPN charges cable
companies?

5. Laws exist to thwart net neutrality concerns today. Say AT&T does 
block Vonage. The Federal Communications Commission can act. Vonage can 
sue under antitrust law. Maybe these efforts won't do enough. If that 
turns out to be the case, then Congress can cook up a fix when the 
problem surfaces. For now, mandating net neutrality is a recipe for 
disaster.

Check out eWEEK.com's Infrastructure Center for the latest news, views
and analysis on servers, switches and networking protocols for the
enterprise and small businesses.

Copyright 2006 Ziff Davis Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more tech news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

From: Knowing About <adil.saeed@hotmail.com>
Subject: Philips Bundles Skype & Windows Live VoIP With Cordless Phones
Date: 15 Aug 2006 11:28:53 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Philips has launched in Australia two cordless phones selling for less
that $160 that operate both as PSTN phones with one model supporting
Skype and the other Windows Live Messenger.  Both are designed to work
with a Windows PC running the respective standard softphone client and
Philips claims that, if the PC is set up and working with the
softphone, the cordless phones are totally plug and play with no set
up required. Full Skype or Windows Live functionality, including
conference calling and instant messaging is supported.

Both products will be widely available through retail outlets under a
distribution deal with Ingram Micro. Mark Franklin, director of Ingram
Micro Australia's communications division, said that cordless phone
sales in Australia were running at around two million units per year
and growing. With the Philips units being within the price range for
standard cordless phones, Franklin said they would be an attractive
alternative, but acknowledged that there was a challenge in education
the retailers to promote the products effectively.

He said the products were targeted at mainstream consumers, not the
technically savvy section of the market. As such they represent an
interesting new option: there are already WiFi cordless phones
available that incorporate the Skype softphone and work with Skype
without the need for PC.

For the potential buyer contemplating the two units they will also
have to choose between Skype and Windows Live versions: a choice
likely to be determined by whether their contacts are predominantly on
Skype or Windows Live. (The phones are visually quite different: The
Windows Live version is black, and the Skype version white).

The phones' base stations connect to the PC via the USB port and use
the international standard DECT technology for the wireless link, not
WiFi. Philips claims that because the DECT frequencies are reserved
for cordless phone application, the phones are less prone to
interference than WiFi and also have better indoor coverage.

The Skype model, the Philips VoIP321 sells for $129.95 in a single
handset version and $199.95 in a two handset version, both are
packaged with 60 minutes of call credits for SkypeOut calls. The DECT
standard supports up to five handsets per base station, but Philips
says there are no plans for other combinations or for single handset
sales -- it cites market research as indicating consumers rarely
upgrade after the initial purchase. However as the phones are DECT
standard, any DECT handset will be supported for PSTN calling.

The unit has a monochrome backlit screen that shows the user's contact
list and which contacts are online. It automatically synchronises with
the PC contact list. It has an inbuilt speakerphone and remembers the
last 20 missed calls and 10 received calls. Up to 50 phone numbers can
be stored. You can get more information about this phones on
http://www.knowingabout.com/voip

Windows XP or 2000 is required. There are no confirmed plans to offer
a version that will work with Skype on the Mac. Kelly Poon, market
development manager for Skype Asia said the Skype softphone for
Windows, Linux and Mac OS X were quite different and any decision to
have the phone work with these would be up to Philips. Matt Moran,
general manager, Consumer Electronics Philips Australia, said he
expected a Mac version would be available, but could give no concrete
information.

Also, although it was claimed that the product's functioning would not
be affected by upgrades to the Skype softphone, the phone comes with a
version of the Softphone on CD with instructions that this version
should be used for the phone to work correctly

The Microsoft Live Messenger version is rather more expensive and
$159.95 and $249.95 for the dual version, largely because it has a
full colour screen, which maintains the look and feel of Microsoft
Live on the PC. It is also able to emulate the multiple account
feature of Windows Live, enabling each user to select their own
account and view their own contact lists.  It is also a speakerphone.

For Further Information : http://www.knowingabout.com/voip

------------------------------

From: Knowing About <adil.saeed@hotmail.com>
Subject: Nokia Congratulates Sprint Nextel On Selection Of Wimax
Date: 15 Aug 2006 11:25:46 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Nokia congratulates Sprint Nextel on its decision to deploy WiMAX
networks in the 2.5 GHz spectrum band. The introduction of
standardized Mobile WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e-2005) networks in the United
States will deliver robust broadband wireless applications and
services to consumers for personal and professional use.

"Nokia believes Sprint Nextel's selection of WiMAX will be a catalyst
for the continued growth and implementation of broadband
technologies." said Tero Ojanpera, Executive Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer, Nokia. "Broadband wireless creates new
opportunities for the consumer and enterprise markets and we are
pleased to see the momentum is starting to build."

Nokia is experienced to provide an end-to-end WiMAX solution, from
infrastructure, to services and applications, to end-user devices.

WiMAX is part of Nokia's radio access technology portfolio and a
major technology for the company's broadband wireless access group.
In the past year, Nokia has announced it is collaborating with Intel in
several areas in support of mobile WiMAX, including mobile clients,
network infrastructure, and market development. Additionally, Nokia
completed an error free data call at its research and development
facility in Germany in October 2005. Nokia's WiMAX infrastructure
solution will be available in accordance with the WiMAX Forum
certification timing.

For Further Information : http://www.knowingabout.com/wimax

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:46:39 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Comcast Looking to Expand its Online Presence


USTelecom dailyLead
August 15, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekakfDtusXaupXbVjH

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY

* Comcast looking to expand its online presence
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Verizon seeks to add TV offering in NYC
* How ads track users online
* Alcatel ups ADSL density on remote cabinets
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* IMS Strategy for Emerging Services Implementation
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Zimmermann: VoIP needs security layer
* Call centers picking up VoIP
* New software program rates VoIP quality
* Commentary: Japan jumping to fiber
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC looking into 77 broadcasters regarding video news releases
DIVERSIONS
* Look, Ma! No Hands, and No iPod
* Paddling Through a North Woods Refuge
* New at Google: Local Coupons
* 9/11 on Big Screen, Ambivalence in Audience
* Finding the Best Fares for Round-the-World Flights

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekakfDtusXaupXbVjH

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:20:57 -0500
Organization: Disorganized


In message <telecom25.299.5@telecom-digest.org> mc
<look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote:

> Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote in message 
> news:telecom25.298.3@telecom-digest.org:

>> [Editor's Note:  A slightly different version of the earlier report.]

>> 3 Texas men arraigned on terror charges.

>> Three Texas men were arraigned Saturday on terrorism-related charges
>> after police found about 1,000 cell phones in their minivan.

>> Investigators believe the men were targeting the 5-mile-long Mackinac
>> Bridge, which connects Michigan's Upper and Lower peninsulas. But one
>> of the men said they were only trying to buy and sell phones to make
>> money.

> Ummm ... Is this from The Onion?  No?

> I don't see what a *large* number of cell phones has to do with
> terrorism.  Yes, a cell phone can be used as a detonator, but you only
> need one, or maybe a few as backups, and having a thousand doesn't
> make it any more terrifying.

And even on the odd chance you're planning a thousand bombs, you'd
need enough other supplies that you could buy them three at a time,
you wouldn't walk into a store and buy 80+ .

Death is life's way of telling you you're fired.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:36:40 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood


Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:30:38 -0500 Ron Kritzman
<ron@dbOnayAmspaYmasters.com> wrote:

> I was channel surfing the other night and caught a minute or two of a
> movie allegedly set in Chicago. In front of Wrigley Field, on the 
> Addison Street side, with the famous red marquee in the background, one
> of the main characters was making a call from a Verizon pay phone! Who 
> knew? Not subtle either. Big logo with the checkmark and the red Z. 
> C'mon guys, if you're going to do product placement at least place it 
> where it lives.

Unless the film was supposed to be 20 years ago the possibility that
it could be something other than Illinois Bell or Ameritech is very
real.  I was in MSP (Minneapolis/St. Paul airport) and all throughout
the airport the pay phones were Ameritech when the local provider in
the twin cities is Qwest.  So it is possible that Verizon could be a
"COCOT" contracted by Wrigley Field or the property owner.

That said many film companies aren't really very good about telephone
"authenticity" when you'll see someone depositing money into a single
slot "fortress" pay phone and you'll hear "ding-ding" when they insert
coins (ding-ding went out when three slot payphones went out.) Or when
you see an older film showing a 'candlestick' or old WECO 302 have the
ringing sound of a WECO 500 or showing a British series and they use
American telephones.  The assumption is that people do not notice
these inaccuracies (except us telecom nerds of course!)

------------------------------

From: ranck@vt.edu
Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:15:20 UTC
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA


Ron Kritzman <ron@dbonayamspaymasters.com> wrote:

> I was channel surfing the other night and caught a minute or two of a 
> movie allegedly set in Chicago. In front of Wrigley Field, on the 
> Addison Street side, with the famous red marquee in the background, one 
> of the main characters was making a call from a Verizon pay phone! Who 
> knew? Not subtle either. Big logo with the checkmark and the red Z. 
> C'mon guys, if you're going to do product placement at least place it 
> where it lives.

In light of some recent fun I've had with Verizon, I'm not sure they
even know where they live.  I plan to type it up for the
newsgroup/digest as soon as the dust settles in a few days.

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: When you do type it up, please send it
in here so our readers can be enlightened, thanks!   PAT]

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood
From: dkrause@ratcage.com (Doug Krause)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:17:09 GMT


In article <telecom25.299.3@telecom-digest.org>, Ron Kritzman
<ron@dbOnayAmspaYmasters.com> wrote:

> I was channel surfing the other night and caught a minute or two of a 
> movie allegedly set in Chicago. In front of Wrigley Field, on the 
> Addison Street side, with the famous red marquee in the background, one 
> of the main characters was making a call from a Verizon pay phone! Who 
> knew? Not subtle either. Big logo with the checkmark and the red Z. 
> C'mon guys, if you're going to do product placement at least place it 
> where it lives.

In "Die Hard 2" they showed Pac Bell phones at Dulles Airport in
Virginia.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #301
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Aug 16 17:06:34 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id AACB021D4; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:06:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Message-Id: <20060816210634.AACB021D4@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:06:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #302
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:08:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 302

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    AOL Decides to Seize Assets From Convicted Spammer (Reuters News Wire)
    Appeals Court Backs FCC on Fiber Line Sharing (Reuters News Wire)
    Logitech Dives Into VoIP (Knowing About)
    FDIC Multimedia Presentation: Protect Against Cybercrime (tedrichardson992)
    Google Everywhere! (Eric Auchard)
    Google Not Aiming to Become National Wi-Fi Player (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 16, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Are These Phones Live? Second Day Story ... _no_ Terror Charges (Burstein)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Steve Sobol)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Charles Cryderman)
    Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood) (Wesrock@aol.com)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:07:10 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: AOL Decides to Seize Assets From Convicted Spammer


AOL to hunt down spammer's gold

AOL says a convicted spammer may have hidden half a million dollars in
gold and platinum on his parents' property, and the company is going
after it.

The online division of Time Warner Inc. said on Wednesday it aims to
recover assets awarded to it in a judgment against Davis Hawke, who
sent at least 130,000 unsolicited junk e-mails to AOL subscribers over
three months in 2004.

AOL said it is owed $12.8 million from a May 2005 judgment awarded by
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

It said it had evidence and reason to believe that $500,000 in gold
and platinum bars are located at Hawke's parents' home in Medfield,
Massachusetts.

"We won't be happy at just winning a judgment, but also to secure those 
assets and plow them back to safety and security efforts for our 
members," AOL spokesman Nicholas Graham said.

AOL has waged a legal and public war against junk e-mail senders, or 
spammers, who have plagued e-mail services globally.

In recent years, AOL has recovered Hummers, Porsche sports cars, gold
coins and other property worth millions of dollars from convicted
spammers, and reinvested it in a spam-fighting campaign, the company
said.

Hawke's parents could not be reached for comment. AOL said it had not
been able to reach Hawke.

The Associated Press quoted Hawke's mother Peggy Greenbaum as saying 
Hawke's assets were not located on the parents' property, where Hawke's 
grandparents also live.

The parents plan to challenge AOL's plans to search the property, the AP 
said.

AOL's Graham said the search of Hawke's parents home will be assisted by 
sonar and radar equipment to minimize damage.

"We've used every means to get in touch with defendants," Graham said. 
"Those attempts have been rebuffed."

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:34:27 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Appeals Court Backs FCC on Fiber Line Sharing


Appeals court backs FCC on fiber line sharing
 
A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday upheld a 2004 decision by
telecommunications regulators allowing regional phone companies to
deploy new fiber-optic lines without having to share them with
competitors.

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a
legal challenge by Internet service provider EarthLink Inc. aimed at
overturning a decision by the Federal Communications Commission.

The court said it was "permissible" for the FCC to absolve the
dominant local telephone carriers, known as the Baby Bells, of sharing
requirements when it comes to new fiber optic networks.

To promote competition, previous rules have required the Bells to
lease access to their copper networks since they own the lines into
most American homes. But the FCC so far has been reluctant to apply
those regulations to new fiber lines.

New fiber-optic networks are seen as pivotal for telephone companies
because the capacity of those lines enable them to offer high-speed
Internet service -- or broadband -- to more customers, as well as
launch video and other services.

They are facing fierce competition from cable television companies
that have already upgraded their networks and offer customers those
services.

EarthLink's executive vice president for public policy, Chris Putala,
said the company would "continue to pursue commercial negotiations for
access to fiber just as we have for DSL (digital subscriber line)."

"If we see that consumers are being harmed by a lack of competition,
we will be revisiting this issue with the FCC and Congress," Putala
said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines of interest, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: Knowing About <adil.saeed@hotmail.com>
Subject: Logitech Dives Into VoIP
Date: 16 Aug 2006 01:43:00 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


VoIP is here -- has been for a while -- and millions of people daily
use popular software like Skype which based on it. Still it remains a
mystery for the average Joe and Logitech is determined to do something
about that.

The peripherals specialist has thrown its weight behind the technology
with a raft of new devices all designed to makes VoIP operation easier
and foremost among them is 'Logitech Cordless Internet Handset'.

The Skype orientated device looks rather like an elongated Nokia and
its colour LCD displays all Skype contacts, offers access to Skype
voicemail and enables users to check incoming and outgoing call logs.
Making a phone call is as simple as scrolling to a contact, selecting
it and clicking the call button.

There's also a hands free speaker phone, illuminated keypad and
variety of ring tones while the handset itself is charged via a cradle
and connects to the PC and Internet through the included USB Base
station. You can start nattering with it in October if you meet the
=A369.99 RRP.Have a look at it on www.knowingabout.com/voip

Also looking rather interesting is the 'QuickCall USB Speakerphone for
Internet Calling' though I do wish Logitech would take the time to
actually name its products rather than simply describe them. The
QCUSBSPFIC, as I shouldn't have abbreviated it to, is a premium
speakerphone that uses a two way microphone display (one on each
'wing' of the device) to capture voices and sounds over a wide
area. It is designed to be a conference meeting's best friend though
I'll take a hammer to it if it picks up the things I tend to whisper
under my breath in most meetings.

It features touch controls to pick up, end and mute calls and alert
lights to indicate when a VoIP call is connected. A central
illuminated volume knob looks really nice but a webcam would've been
even cooler.  Still it keeps the price down and means I can continue
to attend virtual meetings in my underwear, which is always a
pleasure.

The QCUSBSPFIC is out in October in the US but is clearly on the slow
boat to Europe since it doesn't debut here until December. Price is
reasonable.

Moving on we come to the 'EasyCall Desktop' a bundle of mouse,
keyboard, headset and speakerphone for the uninitiated. The latter
part acts as the control centre for the whole thing with volume up and
down, mute, call pickup and disconnect buttons while the keyboard has
been customised for use in Internet calling apps since also provides a
range of similar controls as well as one touch dialling and the
ability to change your online status.

89.99 for this one and you can pocket it (if you have very large
pockets) from mid September.

Last on the VoIP list we have the 'Cordless Headset for PC and Mobile
Phones' (yes, the branding -- or lack of it -- gets irritating
after a while). Not much to say here other than 1. It's Cordless and
2, It's a headset. Because it's Bluetooth it'll also work with
your mobile and has some (more) wonderfully literal technology called
WindStop which ... yep, reduces wind noise.

69.99 is the going rate and it'll appear in the month which means
eight but is actually tenth because of some egomaniacal Roman Emperors.

For Further Information : http://www.knowingabout.com/wifi

------------------------------

From: tedrichardson9925@sbcglobal.net
Subject: FDIC Multimedia Presentation: How to Protect Yourself from Cybercrime
Date: 16 Aug 2006 10:05:19 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


The FDIC has released a great presentation for the average user on how
to not become a victim of cybercrime (identity theft).

http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/08/fdic-releases-multimedia-presentation.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:11:56 -0500
From: Eric Auchard <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Google Everywhere!


Google is everywhere in headquarters town 
By Eric Auchard

Google Inc. has turned the Silicon Valley town where it is
headquartered into a showcase for the advantages of free, citywide
wireless Internet access, in what might be called Google everywhere.

The Web search leader said on Tuesday that it is now making a
Google-supported wireless Internet network generally available to the
72,000 residents of Mountain View, California, along with the town's
office workers, daily visitors and the more than 1,000 Microsoft Corp.
employees at the Google rival's 24-acre Mountain View campus.

Not just local laptop computer owners, but users of any other Wi-Fi
device or telephone simply need to seek out nearby wireless networks
and pick the "Google Wi-Fi" option. Once the device's browser window
opens a Google log-on page appears.

Wireless customers with Google e-mail, instant messaging or home page
accounts can sign in using with their normal passwords. Those wishing
to remain anonymous can create a temporary user name and sign in to a
default Google home page featuring local information on Mountain View
and the surrounding region.

Google says it sees a spike in usage of its search and advertising
services wherever broadband usage spreads. By offering wireless access
inside homes, offices, schools and around town, Google expects further
economic benefits.

Chris Sacca, Google's head of special initiatives, said the main
purpose of his company backing local Wi-Fi access has been to clear
the way for broadband entrepreneurs and overcome legal roadblocks by
established telephone and cable TV providers.

"We want to inspire these networks to be built," Sacca said of
Google's efforts to back the more than 300 Internet service providers
and network equipment makers seeking to build high-speed municipal
Wi-Fi networks in the United States.

With Google's support, the debate over municipal Wi-Fi has been
transformed over the past year, as dozens of U.S. cities from
Philadelphia to Portland, Oregon have forged ahead with
projects. Major telecom carriers such as AT&T Inc. have dropped
lawsuits and bid to participate in some projects.

"We wanted to throw our hat in the ring and show the promise of these
broadband networks," Sacca said of the aim of offering wireless
access.  "We wanted to make it very unpopular for anyone to oppose the
promise of these networks," he said.

Google is also part of a bid to offer Wi-Fi access in San
Francisco. But Sacca emphasized that lead partner Earthlink Inc. is in
charge of negotiating the deal with San Francisco's city
government. Google's Wi-Fi ambitions involve only the two cities, the
Google official underscored.

"Building ISPs is not a very scalable business for us," Sacca said in
an interview, adding that Google prefers to focus on search,
advertising and creating new Web software and services. "I think
Google is going to depend on really healthy relationships with ISPs to
succeed."

Google is prepared to offer community training courses through San
Francisco's 11 political districts. Similar training programs have
attracted hundreds of participants in Mountain View, with as many as
750 at one session, he said.

Any effort to commercialize the Mountain View Wi-Fi service -- perhaps
by placing advertising on Web pages viewed over Google Wi-Fi -- will
come later, if at all, Sacca said.

"We like to build products that solve users' problems," Sacca said.
"There is always an opportunity to go ahead and monetize it later," he
said, using the jargon for making Web pages pay for themselves through
selling ads or other efforts.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:17:57 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Google Not Aiming to Become National Wi-Fi Player


USTelecom dailyLead
August 16, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekkEfDtusXazsiRaSs

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Google not aiming to become national Wi-Fi player
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Satcasters lag in airwaves auction
* Triple play spurs growth at Comcast
* Nortel to help push VoIP
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* IMS Strategy for Emerging Services Implementation
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* More networks opt for all-digital platform
* Mobile providers serving ads on the smallest screens
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Senator pushes for Wi-Fi in smaller communities
* FCC phone line decision upheld by court
* Judge orders Sprint to sell some of its Midwestern wireless assets
DIVERSIONS
* Going to the Source for Your Meal
* Sports' Greatest Hits at One Web Site (but There's a Catch)
* A New Film Documents One Town's Automotive Version of Graffiti
* Tighter Security Is Jeopardizing Orchestra Tours
* With Wagons' Comeback, New Interest in Originals
* Dell Will Recall Batteries in PC's

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekkEfDtusXazsiRaSs

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 16, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:40:01 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 16, 2006
********************************

Vodafone Mulls Converged Fixed-Mobile Services
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19379?11228

     Vodafone's Portuguese unit is considering offering fixed-mobile
     convergence (FMC) services in the country, according to a Diario
     de Noticias report citing a company spokesman. "Vodafone Portugal
     is analysing its positioning not just in the mobile sector but
     also in the total telecommunications market, in the light of ...

Court Backs FCC Ruling on FTTx Access
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19376?11228

     The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has
     rejected a legal attempt by Earthlink to overturn Federal
     Communication Commission (FCC) rules that allow regional
     incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) to deploy FTTx without
     being required to share them with competitors. The court said
     that it was 'permissible' ...

A Taste of LG Chocolate
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19374?11228

     The LG Chocolate has nearly everything a popular mobile phone
     should offer: a stylish design, an array of multimedia features
     and a catchy name. After generating buzz in Europe and Asia over
     the past several months, the phone is finally available in the
     U.S. via Verizon.  The slider-style LG Chocolate (its official
     name is the LG ...

Leap Forges 3G Pact
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19368?11228

     Leap Wireless International is calling on Huawei Technologies to
     help power its Cricket-branded 3G services in three states. The
     deal marks the first time Leap and Huawei have partnered on a
     commercial project.  Under the terms of the deal, Huawei will
     deliver its CDMA2000 network with 1X EV-DO Rev. A-capable base
     station ...

Cable Beats Carriers to Shared Video
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19364?11228

     The explosive appeal of shared Internet video has not been lost
     on service providers. And consumer demand and competitive
     pressure from cable companies may push the telcos to host and
     deliver it to the living room. The U.S. RBOCs are moving
     toward such services, but cautiously, and with some legitimate
     reservations. One big ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Are These Phones Live? Second Day story ... _no_ Terror Charges
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:05:00 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-08-15-voa62.cfm

US Drops Terrorist Charges Linked to Cell Phone Purchase
By VOA News  15 August 2006

U.S. prosecutors have dropped terrorist charges against two men
arrested after they purchased 600 cellular phones.

Officials in the midwestern state of Ohio said they had no evidence of
terrorist activity by the men, Osama Abulhassan and Ali Houssaiky.

They say the men still face a charge of lying to police.

The two men were stopped by police for a traffic violation earlier
this month, and later told officers about the cell phone purchases.

In a separate case, an FBI official said authorities have found no
terrorist links to three other men jailed for buying a large
number of cell phones.

Police say the Palestinian-American men were found with 1,0000 cell
phones in their vehicle and pictures of a major bridge in the northern
state of Michigan.

Authorities say the men remain in custody in Michigan.

Federal law enforcement officials have asked police to watch for
people buying large numbers of cell phones, saying the devices can be
used in terrorist attacks.

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
 =09=09     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Subject: Re: Telecom Re: Clueless Hollywood
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:14:32 -0700
Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com


Steven Lichter wrote:

> It could very well have been a Verizon pay phone.  They have phones in a 
> lot of areas that are not served by them.  In California, you can look 
> outside Albersons Supermarkets, Savon, 7/11 and a lot more.

I still remember being rather surprised to see the Walgreens on Cedar
Road in South Euclid, Ohio, sporting Cincinnati Bell payphones. South
Euclid is a suburb of Cleveland, a good 250-mile drive from
Cincinnati. And unlike the nationwide telcos, Cinti Bell doesn't have
a presence outside southwest Ohio.

Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Apple Valley, California     PGP:0xE3AE35ED

It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:34:00 -0400
From: Charles Cryderman <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com>


Doug Krause wrote:

"In "Die Hard 2" they showed Pac Bell phones at Dulles Airport in
Virginia."

Yet it was filmed in Northern Michigan at a retired Air force Base.


Chip Cryderman

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:48:10 EDT
Subject: Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood)


In a message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:20:42 -0600, Anthony Bellanga
<anthonybellanga@notchur.biz> writes:

> I don't know if at&t (SBC, Pacific Bell, Ameritech, and SNET in
> Connecticut) has private payphones outside of their territory
> (i.e., in non-at&t ILEC ratecenters in at&t ILEC states; or in
> Qwest or BellSouth or Verizon or Cincinnati Bell locations).

Many years ago ... it muxt have been just after divestiture ... I
stopped to use a pay phone somewhere along the road east of Waco,
Texas, in General Telephone territory, and I was surprised to see it
was a Southwestern Bell pay phone.

Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: 16 Aug 2006 10:27:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Larry Dignan wrote:

> 1. Congress will screw it up. If techies can't agree on a definition
> of net neutrality, it's highly unlikely that a bunch of pols
> understand the issue. Let's say Congress does mandate net
> neutrality. Great news, right? Not so fast. Once net neutrality is
> mandated, the laws of unintended consequences kick in. Suddenly, we're
> locked into a Net architecture (the current one that's decades
> old). Suddenly, there are no fast lanes allowed.

All good points.

> 3. All traffic isn't created equal. An e-mail doesn't have the same
> service requirements as a VOIP call. An X-ray of a heart patient
> should have priority over a Britney Spears video. Corporate networks
> manage traffic that way, and at some point there has to be some
> intelligence added to public Internet infrastructure between the end
> points. Net neutrality requirements mean all traffic is created
> equal. You can debate over who makes the call over what traffic gets
> priority, but to pretend all traffic is equal doesn't hold up.

Excellent point.

There's been some anti-telecom company ads on TV which I find
misleading.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Yes, they are good points, Lisa; but
when it comes around to misleading people, Southwestern Bell, using
their latest alias, AT&T is one of the biggest misleaders. I have
pretty much stsyed neutral on the 'net neutrality' debate, but I
have heard telco claiming 'nothing will change' if they are put in
charge of it all; I just cannot imagine _nothing_ will change, and
I suspect the changes will not be good for most netters.  PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #302
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Aug 17 14:27:36 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 1C3A521EE; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Message-Id: <20060817182735.1C3A521EE@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #303
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:29:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 303

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    What to Expect Next in Telcoland (Andrew Schmitt)
    Outside of Wireless, Everything Else is a Commodity (Andrew Schmitt)
    SK Telecom Offers New Cell Phone Internet Service (Information Gatekeeper)
    Cable May Need to Spend Billions to Compete in Broiadband (USTA Daily Lead)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (AES)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (John Levine)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood)(DLR)
    Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood)(Wesrock@aol.com)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (DLR)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Henry)
    Good VOIP Info Site (Ruzzer)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:06:19 -0500
From: Andrew Schmitt <schmitt@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: What to Expect Next in Telcoland


After The AT&T/BellSouth Merger -- What To Expect Next in Telcoland 
(BLS, T, VZ, CMCSA, S, CVC, TWTC, Q)
Predictions made in March, 2007:

Andrew Schmitt submits: 

It's funny to watch the various media groups go through the customary
'Shock and Awe' of a big merger, which in my mind, was as logical as a
merger between Oreo Cookies and Milk. The question was not if it would
happen, only when and for how much. I am particularly entertained by
the consumer groups acting in mock surprise and voicing opposition to
the merger.

Like it or not, big Telco was already back in style. Nothings changed,
it's just that more people are starting to notice.

I'll make a few statements that express my opinion of what sort of
landscape we will be looking at in 12 months. None of it is new
thinking, just additional events that we feel are logical conclusions:

* AT&T buys Bellsouth. The merger is approved by the FCC with the same
terms applied to the SBC/AT&T merger. Regardless of concerns, the fact
is AT&T and Bellsouth don't share a customer base today so it isn't
anti-competive in the sense it offers consumers less choice. The
merger is driven by one thing only: a need to unify ownership of
wireless and wireline assets. Acquisition of additional voice
subscribers within Bellsouth and the additional scale is
secondary. This gives AT&T complete freedom to market universal
wired/wireless voice services to residential customers, something
Vonage, Sunrocket, Comcast, Time Warner cannot do.

* Verizon buys the 40% share of Verizon Wireless it does not own from
Vodaphone. The negotiation is rather odd in the sense that only one
real buyer exists for the property, and Vodaphone cannot currently
extract any real strategic value from its share. Verizon gets a good
deal.

* Comcast (CMCSA) buys Sprint/Nextel (S). This gives them the same
ability as Verizon and AT&T to offer unified wired/wireless voice to
subscribers. AT&T and Verizon both have their own enterprise business
units and backbones so the Enterprise connectivity business unit of
Sprint is most valuable with a carrier that currently lacks this
capability - Comcast. While Sprint/Nextel is the most favored Telco on
Wall St, I've heard that the Sprint/Nextel merger is a disaster,
with both original companies maintaining separate HQ's. Comcast's
CEO Roberts will put their executive teams out of their misery.

* Comcast has secured the last remaining wireless property and have an
Enterprise business unit, therefore Cablevision (CVC) and Time Warner
Telecom (TWTC) are exposed and capitulate to Comcast. Now that Telcos
have the will and technology to offer video, no major regulatory
barrier exists, and a merger of a single national coax based carrier
is born as Comcast, Time Warner, and Cablevision unite in order to
acheive the scale to meet the new Telco threat.

* Wildcards: Qwest, T-Mobile. Qwest (Q) could go to Comcast to provide
an Enterprise service unit, though they might also be acquired by AT&T
or Verizon in a defensive move. Deutche Telekom will sell their
wireless business before all of the above mergers take place. T-mobile
is worth more now than it ever will be as the number of prospective
buyers dwindles. If Comcast cannot buy Sprint, they will buy T-Mobile
and Qwest. It's also possible Time Warner/Cablevision buy T-Mobile
to compete with Comcast/Sprint.

That leaves us with three major carriers for Enterprise services, one or 
no standalone wireless companies (although MVNO's will still exist, and 
may be more valuable), and residences with a choice of two wireline 
options. Wireless and wireline as products lose distinction and companes 
bundle them together. Standalone VoIP companies that charge for service 
vaporize as wireless voice becomes the prime mover for customer retention.

The other area that will finally see dramatic change is the equipment
supplier space, as these new behemoths whittle down their equipment
supply chain. Om Malik sees this as very good for Optical Ethernet,
though I am not sure why. I think it's going to be good for suppliers
to the old SBC as well as Sprint. Two equipment companies that fall
into this category are Ciena (CIEN) and Adtran (ADTN). Expect to see
Huawei to show up in North America at the same time.

Bottom line, anyone who was shocked by the Bellsouth announcement just
hasn't been paying attention. The next steps are just as logical in my
mind.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:09:29 -0500
From: Andrew Schmitt <schmitt@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Outside of Wireless, Everything Else is a Commodity


Outside of Wireless, Everything is a Commmodity
Posted on Aug 15th, 2006 
Andrew Schmitt update:

Andrew Schmitt submits: Businessweek writes about T-mobile (DT) and a
new service they are rolling out using UMA phones (dual GSM/WiFi). 
These new mobile phones make use of the WiFi network and broadband
connection in a users home to make phone calls off the GSM or cellular
network.

Contrary to popular opinion, the real threat to the Baby Bells'
residential phone business is not the cablecos' VoIP but wireless
substitution. Competition from cell phones was eating away at
residential lines long before the cablecos began deploying voice
services.

Most baby Bells already have a wireless infrastructure. None of the
cablecos do. This is why the Baby Bells ultimately have the upper hand
over the cableco in the battle for residential subscribers. They can
migrate their customers (and their phone numbers) to a wireless
infrastructure, and Comcast (CMCSA) / Cablevision (CVC) /Time Warner
(TWX) cannot. Comcast can migrate customers to Sprint/Nextel (S), but
without owning the infrastructure they won't extract maximum value.

Wireless is the commanding heights and the most important infrastruc-
ture to own and operate in a voice network. Everything else is a
commodity.

It isn't surprising that T-Mobile is at the vanguard here. They have
no baby bell wireline component to worry about cannibalizing, nor
cableco partners to upset like Sprint/Nextel. T-mobile also caters to
a younger, more cost-sensitive market perfect for a service like this.

I expect to see AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) slugging it out 2 years from
now, each offering a VoIP WiFi product that offers a wireless phone
that roams between a home WiFi hotspot and their cellular
network. This service will be nationwide, unlike the video and
broadband services that will remain wired. Customers will choose a
voice provider using the same criteria they evaluate wireless
providers today, and a broadband/video provider based on what service
is offered in their local area.

The idea of standalone residential voice is dead, regardless of
whether sent over copper pair, cable modem, or $19.99 a month Vonage
(VG) service. The battle for residential VoIP customers being waged by
the cablecos is futile.

The cablecos need to and will buy a company with wireless infrastruc-
ture.  The spate of telecom mergers will spill into the cable and 
wireless sectors as reality sets in. (see  my other article today,
'What To Expect Next in Telcoland').

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:02:00 -0500
From: Information Gatekeepers <gate@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: SK Telecom Offers New Cell Phone Internet Service


SK Telecom offers new cell phone Internet service
The Mobile Internet,  April, 2005  

SK Telecom Co, South Korea's biggest mobile phone operator, said
Wednesday it has launched a new version of cell phone Internet service
as part of its efforts to find a new growth area in the nation's
saturated market.

The new wireless Internet service, which is based on an interactive
user interface in the mobile phone's window, include a personalized
digital character, short text messaging and personalized programs that
let users to know about 10 kinds of information such as news, weather,
television programs and movies, SK Telecom said. The new service
allows users to talk to or manage their personalized digital
characters on the handset screens.

"As the mobile phone use environment becomes more sophisticated and
diversified, customers increasingly want to quickly and accurately
find needed information via mobile phones," said Yoon Song-yee, senior
vice president of SK Telecom.

The new service requires customers to buy new handsets and pay
additional fees, with a monthly subscription charge of 1,200 won.
 
So far, three such handsets made by LG Electronics Inc. and Samsung 
Electronics Co. are available on the market, SK Telecom said.

SK Telecom is trying to persuade customers to spend more on wireless
Internet to diversify its revenue sources. SK Telecom controls more
than half of South Korea's mobile market with 19 million
subscribers. Around 39 million people, or 78 percent of the country's
population, subscribe to mobile phone services in South Korea as of
the end of March.

COPYRIGHT 2005 Information Gatekeepers, Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

Also see http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:32:27 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead  <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Study: Cable May Need to Spend Billions to Compete in Broadband


USTelecom dailyLead
August 17, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekwsfDtusXaCvibyGt

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Study: Cable may need to spend billions to compete in broadband
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* AT&T unveils digital living room package
* Sprint Nextel experiencing growing pains
* Motorola's Multi-Net Mobility receives system upgrades
* EarthLink, Circuit City ink deal on VoIP
* Giving credit to TV's little-known creator
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Steven Shepard's IMS Crash Course
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Conference: HDTV becoming more mainstream
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Cablevision says prosecutors investigating stock-option grants
DIVERSIONS
* I Saw What You Did and I Know Who You Are. My Phone Told Me.
* In San Francisco and Almost Home
* A Food Web Site, Spiced With Attitude
* Back to School, With Cellphone and Laptop
* Old Records Go In, CD's Come Out
* What Can Be Carried On?

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ekwsfDtusXaCvibyGt

------------------------------

From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:56:46 -0700
Organization:  Stanford University


Ironically, the same set of messages on my newsgroup that contained the 
first couple of posts in this thread also had a subsequent post which 
said

   A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday upheld a 2004 decision by
   telecommunications regulators allowing regional phone companies
   to deploy new fiber-optic lines without having to share them with
   competitors.

   The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a
   legal challenge by Internet service provider EarthLink Inc. aimed at
   overturning a decision by the Federal Communications Commission.

   The court said it was "permissible" for the FCC to absolve the
   dominant local telephone carriers, known as the Baby Bells, of sharing
   requirements when it comes to new fiber optic networks.

Come on, guys!  

The capacity of even a single optical fiber is so immense that it
makes absolutely no sense, economically, socially, or any other way,
to have competing information providers repeatedly tear up public
streets, sidewalks, and rights of way to provide multiple fibers,
cables or wires into my house.

If AT&T or Comcast want to negotiate franchise deals with my community
to run fibers or cables along public rights of way to reach my house
(at, admittedly, very considerable expense to them), I'll be more than
happy to pay them a fair price for the continued use of that
infrastructure -- provided that once I pay that fair price, I can use
this infrastructure to reach any and all the different places on the
Information Highway that I want to reach over it, and to access any
and all of the different competitive information services that will
want to serve me over that infrastructure, with no control or
interference by them.

Maybe I misunderstand the initial posts, but if AT&T or whoever can
use public rights of way to build this infrastructure, and then only
let it be used to access electronic services *they* provide, merchants
*they* own, entertainment sources *they* are selling -- are you really
trying to tell me this is going to promote competition and innovation
in any of these areas?

Completely open use of that infrastructure by anyone who wants to pay 
them just the fair transmission costs of sending bits over it 
(appropriate depreciation costs of course included) is the sine qua non 
of their being allowed to build it over public rights of way.

And secondarily, but far from trivial, once I've paid for the fair use
of this infrastructure, I don't want AT&T or whoever monitoring or
recording the specific bits I send over it, for any purpose whatsoever
(things like court-ordered -- and it better be court ordered --
"wiretapping" excepted).

If I go to the the Borders Books site over their fiber and search for 
books on home finance, I don't want AT&T noting this and selling my name 
to Joe's Sleazy Home Loan Service (and is there any other kind).  If 
AT&T is the corporate parent of North Face, I don't want them 
deliberately giving me speedy connections to the North Face web site, 
but only a slow and deliberately bit-dropping link to Lands End -- or 
worse, "accidentally" misdirecting me from the latter web site to the 
former.  And if anyone doesn't think these kinds of things, and worse, 
can and will happen, you must have never in your life used a broadband 
link.

Once we've paid the fair and limited transmission costs to the builder 
of the local information infrastructure, our use of any physical 
broadband connections to the worldwide Information Highway should be as 
absolutely open, free, uncontrolled and anonymous as our use of city 
streets and State and County roads to reach the U.S. Interstate freeway 
system, once we've paid our taxes and auto license fees.  That's what 
"network neutrality" means to me -- and it's absolutely nonnegotiable.

------------------------------

Date: 17 Aug 2006 02:07:34 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality


> "Net neutrality" is a term few can agree on.

There is a perfectly good definition of net neutrality: everyone who
gets the same service pays the same price for it.  Particularly if one
of the bodies is a subsidiary of the telco or cableco.  A lot of us
have well-founded concerns that the telcos will make sweetheart deals
with themselves like they did with DSL, with the wholesale price to
everyone else somehow being more than the retail price their own
affiliate charges.

I don't think anyone except perhaps Verizon, AT&T, and Qwest would
object to this kind of requirement.  Too bad there's such a huge and
needless fog around what should be a straightforward pro-competition
policy.

Regards,

John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: 17 Aug 2006 08:35:17 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


Larry Dignan wrote:

> 3. All traffic isn't created equal. An e-mail doesn't have the same
> service requirements as a VOIP call. An X-ray of a heart patient
> should have priority over a Britney Spears video. Corporate networks
> manage traffic that way, and at some point there has to be some
> intelligence added to public Internet infrastructure between the end
> points. Net neutrality requirements mean all traffic is created
> equal. You can debate over who makes the call over what traffic gets
> priority, but to pretend all traffic is equal doesn't hold up.

When you do this, what you have isn't the internet any more.

The beauty and the failing of the net is that everyone is equal and every
device is treated like every other device.  Unfortunately this is not a good
thing to carry realtime data.

There have been attempts to do what you describe with QoS management,
where some kinds of traffic gets treated differently than other kinds
of traffic.  In general, these things don't work very well, because
the underlying protocol isn't designed for it.

If you want a largescale nationwide network to handle realtime data
like VOIP, video traffic, and high resolution X-rays at the same time,
it ought to be built very differently than the Internet.  Because the
Internet just isn't built for that.  Sorry.  

--scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:37:51 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood)


Wesrock@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:20:42 -0600, Anthony Bellanga
> <anthonybellanga@notchur.biz> writes:

>> I don't know if at&t (SBC, Pacific Bell, Ameritech, and SNET in
>> Connecticut) has private payphones outside of their territory
>> (i.e., in non-at&t ILEC ratecenters in at&t ILEC states; or in
>> Qwest or BellSouth or Verizon or Cincinnati Bell locations).

> Many years ago ... it muxt have been just after divestiture ... I
> stopped to use a pay phone somewhere along the road east of Waco,
> Texas, in General Telephone territory, and I was surprised to see it
> was a Southwestern Bell pay phone.

SWBell seemed to try anything related to phones for a while. I remember 
seeing phones, caller id boxes, etc ... with their logo all over the 
country. Mostly cheap junk. Amazingly they dropped much or all of this 
stuff after a while. :)

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:11:32 EDT
Subject: Re: Verizon and Other Payphones (re: Clueless Hollywood) 


In a message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:20:42 -0600, Anthony Bellanga
<anthonybellanga@notchur.biz> writes:

> I don't know if at&t (SBC, Pacific Bell, Ameritech, and SNET in
> Connecticut) has private payphones outside of their territory
> (i.e., in non-at&t ILEC ratecenters in at&t ILEC states; or in
> Qwest or BellSouth or Verizon or Cincinnati Bell locations).

Many years ago ... it must have been just after divestiture ... I
stopped to use a pay phone somewhere along the road east of Waco,
Texas, in General Telephone territory, and I was surprised to see it
was a Southwestern Bell pay phone.


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:39:52 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood


Charles Cryderman wrote:

> Doug Krause wrote:

> "In "Die Hard 2" they showed Pac Bell phones at Dulles Airport in
> Virginia."

> Yet it was filmed in Northern Michigan at a retired Air force Base.

Yep. Dulles has a very distinctive terminal, inside and out, and
apparently they kept all the scenes in the airport very tight so you
couldn't see the missing elements.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood
From: henry999@eircom.net (Henry)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:07:54 +0300
Organization: Saunalahti Customer


Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The assumption is that people do not notice these inaccuracies
> (except us ... nerds of course!)

And even among those who do notice, how many people are really bothered?

There's a great anecdote from London in the 1930s. Remember, those
were the days when the cinema was an ornate 'Movie Palace' and people
actually got all dressed up to go see a film.

(I'm sorry I can't remember the exact details of this, but you'll get
the idea.)

One night an eminent ornithologist was at the pictures with some
friends. Suddenly, a bird singing in the background on the soundtrack
caught his attention. The expert looked perplexed, but nothing more.
Then, a short while later the bird-call came again -- and that was that.

'What are they trying to do?!?' said the professor, getting to his feet.
'This is preposterous! That's obviously a _____ singing in the
background and this story is set in _____. There is of course absolutely
no way that there could be a _____ in _____!' -- and out he went, in a
huff.

Cheers,

Henry 

------------------------------

From: Ruzzer <crutter@comcast.net>
Subject: Good VOIP Info Site
Date: 16 Aug 2006 17:25:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Please check out http://www.BestVoip.ws

Regards.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #303
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Aug 17 16:25:17 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id D6C8A21E2; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Message-Id: <20060817202516.D6C8A21E2@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #304
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:27:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 304

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Telcos Prepare For Worst as Wiretapo Cases Consolidate (Kevin Fayle)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 17, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching (Lisa Hancock)
    City Party Line Service (Lisa Hancock)
    Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Sam Spade (William Warren)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Patrick Townson)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Garrett Wollman)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:53:52 -0500
From: Kevin Fayle <fayle@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Telcos Prepare For the Worst as Wiretapo Cases Consolidate and Head


By Kevin Fayle in San Francisco

AT&T and other telcos had better unlock the file cabinets and brace
for the backlash because the mother lode of wiretapping cases has just
landed in unfriendly territory.

Both the Feds and the telcos earlier this month took a hit when the
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the pretrial
proceedings of 17 different warrantless wiretapping suits that accuse
the telcos of forming uncomfortable ties with the NSA. 

The Panel placed the cases under the supervision of Judge Vaughn
Walker of the District Court for the Northern District of
California. Yes, that's right, the same judge who last month denied
the government's motion to block discovery in one of the cases on
state secret grounds.

This move has huge significance, since the pretrial proceedings for
the other suits involve many of the same issues that Judge Walker has
already ruled upon. For example, Judge Walker has shown a willingness
to let discovery of corporate records proceed in a case involving
AT&T's alleged complicity in the interception of telephone calls,
so he will most likely allow additional plaintiffs to demand documents
and other evidence from telcos in similar suits.

But don't get too excited, discovery junkies.

The government brought the motion for consolidation in order to
tighten access to confidential information and prevent leaks. With 17
separate cases, the chances that confidential information will find
its way from a judge's chambers into the media are increased by a
factor of, well, 17. With only one judge involved, the chances for a
nice, juicy leak drop significantly.

Still, the government has to be smarting over this move.

The Feds had originally looked to place the cases under the auspice of
a judge in the District of Columbia. This represented a fine strategic
move, since federal decisions coming out of D.C. tend to favor the
government.

The Panel, sensibly enough, felt that a transfer to a court that had
already seen the classified information would better serve the
consolidation motion's goal of limiting exposure to sensitive
data. They then proceeded to send the cases to a much, much less
favorable venue from the government's perspective.

The Feds should've been careful what they wished for.

And why did the Panel send the cases to the Northern District,? Well,
the Panel suggests that the California case has progressed to the most
advanced stage. There's also the fact that the California judge has
seen more confidential material since his case dealt with both
warrantless wiretaps and the release of customer data, while a similar
Illinois case dealt only with the latter.

Reading the tealeaves, you could argue that the consolidation out West
also shows that the general mood among jurists in the country is
leaning towards a full airing of the secrets behind the wiretap
programs. We like to believe this explanation, if only because it
ever-so-slightly renews our faith in the system, along with our belief
in truth, justice, beauty and the rest of it.

And in these days of domestic spying and militarism, we need all the
help we can get. ®

Kevin Fayle is an attorney, web editor and writer in San Francisco. He 
keeps a close eye on IP and International Law issues.

Copyright 2006, Kevin Fayle, The Register  http://theregister.co.uk .

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 17, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:45:13 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 17, 2006
********************************

Bidding for U.S. Advanced Services Wireless Licences Tops US$10
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/100/19397?11228

     The leading satellite providers have pulled out of the bidding,
     while cable TV operators and the leading wireless operators
     remain locked in ...

Regulator Warns Deutsche Telekom on Access to VDSL Network
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19395?11228

     Germany telecoms regulator Bundesnetzagentur has raised the
     stakes in the ongoing saga over Deutsche Telekom's new VDSL
     network, urging the telco to seek an amicable deal with rivals in
     order to avoid intervention from regulators. In an interview with
     Financial Times Deutschland, Bundesnetzagentur president Matthias
     Kurth said ...

Yahoo!, go2 Forge Mobile Search Pact
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/110/19390?11228

     Yahoo! and go2 Directory Systems are coming together in the world
     of mobile search to combine go2's user base and mobile local
     search know-how with Yahoo! sponsored search results. Terms
     of the deal were not disclosed.  The agreement allows Yahoo!
     advertisers to connect with consumers who use their mobile phones
     to ...

Mountain View Gets Free Access
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/100/19385?11228

     As of this morning, residents in Mountain View, Calif., no longer
     need to pay for Internet access. After months of previews and
     testing, has launched a free wireless network in its hometown,
     covering almost all of the town's 12 square miles.  Located
     in the heart of Silicon Valley and one of the most prosperous
     (and ...

Is AT&T Eyeing Eyespot?
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/105/19384?11228

     The big phone companies may not be as quick to deliver  Internet
     shared video services as the cable MSOs are, but that doesn't
     mean  they're ignoring the trend. Sources say AT&qT Inc.
     has recently been in discussions  with up-and-coming video sharer
     Eyespot Corp. The carrier and Eyespot began  talking, according to
     one ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:50:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


In 1922 the Bell System implemented "panel" dial switching in New York
City.  The system had to handle a high volume of calls and a wide
diversity of central offices throughout New York City.  This would've
been impossible with Step-by-Step which was limited to a 10x10 point
rotary switch.  Panel translated the decimal exchange to codes for
hundreds of trunks as needed.  Panel used common control to do this.
That is, it stored the telephone number and translated it as needed
for switching needs.

The control functions of panel were similar to modern computer CPU
instructions and I/O bus commands.  An ingenius sequence switch,
loaded with numerous cams, controlled the functions.  Different parts
of the switchgear would be selected, the unit would wait for a ready
signal, send out a command, then wait for a response and act
accordingly.  Everything was run by a pulse train generator exactly
the same as a CPU clock today.

Signals between devices were self checking to detect errors.  All gear
had internal error detection as well as test functions.

Remember this was all 1922, long before diodes and solid state
devices, indeed, tube electronics were brand new and still being
developed.  It was all done with electro-mechanical relays.  All
equipment had to be extremely durable and precise to handle a high
load volume and last in service a long time.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: City Party Line Service
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:58:36 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


When party lines are discussed, people usually talk about coded
ringing and that everyone's phone rang with all calls.

However, in city service this did not occur.

The panel dial switching system, developed in 1922, included
provisions for two and four party line service, which were common in
those days.  Each party had their own listed phone number and could be
anything, not necessarily consecutive.  There was no need for party
letters.  When calling a party line, the switchgear deteced the type
of selective ringing and (bias and ground combinations) and sent out
the appropriate ringing current.  Only the desired telephone rang.
This helped privacy since other parties wouldn't know the phone was in
use.

After WW II party line service declined, but postwar Bell System had a
bad shortage of capacity to meet new demand, so party lines were
forced to continue more than many users wanted. (Movie "Pillow Talk").

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:03:56 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


The Bell System is sometimes criticized for converting to dial during
the Depression, which caused operators to be laid off at a time when
jobs were scarce.  However, that is only part of the story.

The use of automation saved money which kept phone rates low which
enabled more people to keep their phone service.  (Many people simply
could no longer keep a phone and terminated their service.)

Also, automation required hiring of craftsmen to install dials at
subscribers, install the dial exchange, and factory workers to make
the exchange and new dial telephone sets.  I suspect these efforts
kept a lot of people at work in the Depression and those jobs were
welcomed.  The purchase of insulation, steel, copper, and brass for
the switchgear also helped the overall economy.

Further, there tended to be high turnover in operator jobs; it was
something many young women took only until they were married.  Of
course circumstances were different in those days and single and
widowed women had to find work, but in some way that was made up by
the increase in Western Electric employment.  (Yes, that didn't
usually help a laid-off telephone operator.)

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Actually, the 'Great Depression' is 
normally dated as the last three months of 1929, along with 1930-33.
I do not think Bell did any central office conversions during that
time period, or very few of them. Chicago did not start converting 
until 1939, after the depression, when our country was well on the 
way toward recovery (which generally means a war is going on). Many
of the conversions occurred in the late 1940's and throughout the
1950's, and as we know, those were much better times financially for
almost everyone.    PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:21:01 -0400
From: William Warren <william_warren_nonoise@speakeasy.net>
Subject: Re: Sam Spade


William Warren wrote:

> William Warren wrote:

>> Don't do it, Pat! If you do, the terrorists have won!

>> William Warren

>> (Filter noise from my address for direct replies)

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Why would you say something like that?
>> The 'terrorists' won long ago, when you started asking people to
>> 'filter noise from your address' and when readers started using
>> Spam Assassin and when mailing list maintainers started requiring
>> their readers to jump through hoops to get on or off mailing lists.
>> Why is a simple minded filter -- (either the word '[telecom]' is
>> present or it is not present) -- such a sign that the 'terrorists'
>> have won?   PAT] 
> 
> Pat,

> That was a joke. I had thought you would laugh.

> Sorry.

> William

> (Filter noise from my address for direct replies. No laughing matter!)

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I _would_ laugh if it were not such a
> hypocritcal thing. People talk about how anything but the purest of
> email address forms used in email are such a hassle (I quite agree)
> but the same people then act like it is so 'politically incorrect' to
> attack the problem at its source; i.e. the spammer/scammers who make
> it necessary. You'll have to pardon me, but I get very tired of 
> having to give even a cursory review to several hundred items each 
> day which are only penis-enlargement advertisements, requests to
> re-enter time and again all my personal banking information, etc. The
> really evil thing about it all is even when I try my hardest, some
> days _good_ messages get dumped by accident. People get one single
> phish-item in their mail and think it is such an affront ... well,
> I get hundreds of them daily, and even if I culd just type 'delete 1-250'
> and be done with it, it would still be a nuisance, but when good
> messages get caught in the middle of that mess each day as they _always_
> do, it makes the job much harder. PAT]

Pat,

OK, I take your point. I had intended to sound humorous, not
hypocritical, but I understand that you're the guy in the hot seat.

Here's a suggestion: it may sound far-fetched at first, but please
believe me when I say that I've used this technique with great effect
for my customers and myself, so I'll propose that you try it.

Consider: spamming is only profitable when the only people who respond
are those who want to buy something. If even a small percentage of
calls are from those who don't want the spam, the paradigm changes
very quickly.

Once per day, please publish the contact info (URL, phone, whatever)
for a single spammer, and the email address the spam was sent to, and
suggest that c.d.t. readers contact the company and discourage them
from using your email address. Spammers are, believe it or not,
businessmen, and they tend to act fairly quickly when someone stuffs a
rag into their pipeline. (1)

I suggest you start with mortgage spammers: they have to sell their
leads to local brokers who know the local real estate market, so
they're the easiest ones to catch. Be sure to tell the readership that
spammers do listwashing: someone who fills out a form on a website
will always get a call from the spammer's minions, asking "Was there
anything unusual about the email you received?", and it's important to
get by that gatekeeper and wait for the local brokers to call. When
they do, a complaint about a specific email address works wonders: the
mortgage brokers pay as much as $100 per lead, so they'll scream very
quickly when they get burned, and your email address will, just as
quickly, be placed on the "Do Not Call" lists the spammers share with
each other.

Now, I'll just touch on the morality issue: some of your readers may
be squemish about this kind of proactive approach. For those so
inclined, there are other (less effective) ways to take action, such
as reports to the FBI's online reporting service. However, if any of
your readers think this kind of direct action is improper/not_cricket/
sleezy/whatever, I will simply say that, like spam, it works.

William

1. Of course, the contact has to be a web site or phone number that
won't demand confidential information, since generating phony
MasterCard numbers and tickling drop-boxes are tricks best left to the
major-league spamfighters.


William Warren

(Filter noise from my address for direct replies)

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: To know whether or not the web site
will or will not require confidential information, then I or someone
would have to first examine it, wouldn't we?  Your idea sounds good
enough, in fact it reminds me of when I used to publish the 'Business
Directory' occassionally, giving the 800 numbers of spammers/scammers
who were brazen enough to include that number in their junk email. But
I am afraid that by publishing one or more of the great offers sent
out to the net each day, I would probably be accused of (1) attempting
to harass the spammer/scammer or (2) helping to further the spam
myself and in any event acting very politically incorrect, given the
large number of spam/scam enablers on the net; that is, the number
of users who claim all we have to do is 'ignore it' by feebly
attempting to filter around it.    PAT]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:19:18 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


John Levine wrote:

> There is a perfectly good definition of net neutrality: everyone who
> gets the same service pays the same price for it.  Particularly if one
> of the bodies is a subsidiary of the telco or cableco.  A lot of us
> have well-founded concerns that the telcos will make sweetheart deals
> with themselves like they did with DSL, with the wholesale price to
> everyone else somehow being more than the retail price their own
> affiliate charges.

Sorry, but in today's world, that kind of pricing is all part of the
"free market".  And a "free market" is what was desired when they took
away regulation.  If you don't like these kinds of pricing plans, you
need to go back to a regulated world.  You can't have it both ways.

A free market means someone can charge what the market will bear to
maximize his profits.

In other words, if you want some coast-to-coast airline flights to cost
$39, you'll have to accept certain other flights, perhaps even within a
single state, will cost $750.

Elsewhere (in a discussion of Metroliner telephone service), someone
claimed Verizon's stock price has steeply fallen.  I presume that's
true, and that is what free markets do.  The NYT said recently Verizon
was installing FIOS like crazy to stem a flow of lost customers.

The great and powerful AT&T doesn't even exist anymore except in name.
Free markets at work.

If the telcos price themselves too high, consumers will find
alternatives, either a cheaper vendor or alternative technology.
Perhaps not in the short term, but they will in the long term,
especially with today's technology which is constantly evolving.

Scott Dorsey wrote:

> If you want a largescale nationwide network to handle realtime data
> like VOIP, video traffic, and high resolution X-rays at the same time,
> it ought to be built very differently than the Internet.  Because the
> Internet just isn't built for that.  Sorry.

All very true.

Sooner or later people must realize the Internet wasn't built for a
lot of things, like security and safety.

Automobiles and highways weren't built for safety.  It took 50 years
before they even realized this, and 25 more years to design, build,
and implement various safety features to cut down the carnage.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:25:12 -0500
From: Patrick Townson <ptownson@cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Why I do not Favor 'Net Neutrality'


Larry Dignan wrote:

>> 3. All traffic isn't created equal. An e-mail doesn't have the same/
>> service requirements as a VOIP call. An X-ray of a heart patient/
>> should have priority over a Britney Spears video. Corporate networks/
>> manage traffic that way, and at some point there has to be some/
>> intelligence added to public Internet infrastructure between the end/
>> points. Net neutrality requirements mean all traffic is created/
>> equal. You can debate over who makes the call over what traffic gets/
>> priority, but to pretend all traffic is equal doesn't hold up./

> When you do this, what you have isn't the internet any more.

> The beauty and the failing of the net is that everyone is equal and
> every device is treated like every other device. Unfortunately this
> is not a good thing to carry realtime data.

Well, you miss the point, IMO ... the Internet, as it was historically 
developed and as we knew it for the first twenty or so years of its 
existence reached its death in 1994 more or less, when the invaders 
moved into our village. _We_ had a good thing going; _we_ had a 
wonderful system which mostly worked quite well. Along with the first 
bunch of no-goods to move in and take residence here were the movie and 
music people, who refused to accept the basic concepts here that what 
you leave out in the public way is intended for use by the general 
public. They could not or would not accept that simple concept which 
governed us quite well for a couple decades. They said the way we will 
get even with you for rooting through our movies and music scattered 
everywhere is _not_ by setting permissions on the directories to keep 
you out, if will be by suing each of you who dare to get into our stuff 
without permission, since you old-timers here no longer run things; 
rather we with the money and the (ostensibly) good looks and charm are 
now in charge. Shortly thereafter, other maruders came along and 
attempted to redefine what the internet would be about. Now that they 
have done just that, you want to sit there and act surprised? Why in
the hell weren't these people stopped dead in their tracks before they
moved in and took over? Now it is going to be impossible to get rid
of them.

PAT

------------------------------

From: wollman@csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:42 UTC
Organization: MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory


In article <telecom25.303.7@telecom-digest.org>, Scott Dorsey
<kludge@panix.com> wrote:

> There have been attempts to do what you describe with QoS management,
> where some kinds of traffic gets treated differently than other kinds
> of traffic.  In general, these things don't work very well, because
> the underlying protocol isn't designed for it.

No, the "underlying protocol" has nothing to do with it.  That's the
beauty of IP: it's service-model independent.  We have a "best-effort"
service now, but a guaranteed service could be implemented without any
changes to the IP layer.  The reason we don't have one now is the lack
of a business model that could support it.  (The people I used to work
for helped to invent all the necessary technology in the early- to
mid-nineties, before the boom created a bandwidth glut.  It was a
serious research effort back when a T1 was more than most people had.)

--

Garrett A. Wollman    | As the Constitution endures, persons in every
wollman@csail.mit.edu | generation can invoke its principles in their own
Opinions not those    | search for greater freedom.
of MIT or CSAIL.      | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #304
******************************

    
    
From prvs=telecom-owner+M2753=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=037889dcc9@telecom-digest.org  Fri Aug 18 00:13:59 2006
Return-Path: <prvs=telecom-owner+M2753=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=037889dcc9@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42])
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 51C1421D0
	for <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 11313 invoked by uid 85); 18 Aug 2006 04:12:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 11227 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2006 04:12:36 -0000
Received: from massis.lcs.mit.edu (128.31.0.14)
  by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2006 04:12:36 -0000
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix)
	id DD7EA21E6; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id E6E7E21D1; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:12:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #305
Message-Id: <20060818041233.E6E7E21D1@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:12:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Reply-To: telecom@telecom-digest.org
List-Help: <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Unsubscribe: (Use this command to get off the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe%20telecom>
List-Subscribe: (Use this command to join the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe%20telecom>
List-Post: <mailto:telecom@telecom-digest.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-telecom@telecom-digest.org> (Contact Person for Help)
List-ID: <telecom.telecom-digest.org>
X-Loop: majordomo
Precedence: bulk
Sender: telecom-owner@telecom-digest.org
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:14:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 305

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Judge Rules Warentless Spying is Unconstitutional (Sarah Karush, AP)
    In-Flight Web Surfing Takes a Step Back (Chris Reiter, Reuters News)
    Cyber Bullying Problem (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (John L)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (DLR)
    Re: Clueless Hollywood (Sam Spade)
    Re: City Party Line Service (Wesrock@aol.com)
    Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching (Jim Haynes)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:37:37 -0500
From: Sarah Karush, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Judge Rules Warentless Spying is Unconstitutional


Judge nixes warrantless surveillance
By SARAH KARUSH, Associated Press Writer

A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless
surveillance program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt
to it.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first
judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she
says violates the rights to free speech and privacy as well as the
separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

"Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this
matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution," Taylor wrote in her
43-page opinion.

The Justice Department appealed the ruling and issued a statement
calling the program "an essential tool for the intelligence community
in the war on terror."

White House press secretary Tony Snow said the Bush administration
"couldn't disagree more with this ruling."

"United States intelligence officials have confirmed that the program
has helped stop terrorist attacks and saved American lives," he said.
"The program is carefully administered and only targets international
phone calls coming into or out of the United States where one of the
parties on the call is a suspected al-Qaida or affiliated terrorist."

The ruling won't take immediate effect so Taylor can hear a Justice
request for a stay pending its appeal. A hearing on the motion was set
for Sept. 7, Snow said.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of
journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it
difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their
overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, monitoring phone
calls and e-mails between people in the U.S. and people in other
countries when a link to terrorism is suspected.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's
authority, but said proving that would require revealing state
secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the
Bush administration already had publicly revealed enough information
about the program for Taylor to rule.

"At its core, today's ruling addresses the abuse of presidential power
and reaffirms the system of checks and balances that's necessary to
our democracy," ACLU executive director Anthony Romero told reporters
after the ruling.

He called the opinion "another nail in the coffin in the Bush
administration's legal strategy in the war on terror."

While siding with the ACLU on the surveillance issue, Taylor dismissed
a separate claim by the group over NSA data-mining of phone
records. She said not enough had been publicly revealed about that
program to support the claim and further litigation would jeopardize
state secrets.

The lawsuit alleged that the NSA "uses artificial intelligence aids to
search for keywords and analyze patterns in millions of communications
at any given time." Multiple lawsuits have been filed related to
data-mining against phone companies, accusing them of improperly
turning over records to the NSA.

However, the data-mining was only a small part of the Detroit suit,
said Ann Beeson, the ACLU's associate legal director and the lead
attorney on the case.

Beeson predicted the government would appeal the wiretapping ruling
and request that the order to halt the program be postponed while the
case makes its way through the system. She said the ACLU had not yet
decided whether it would oppose such a postponement.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:48:03 -0500
From: Chris Reiter, Reuters News <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: In-Flight Web Surfing Takes a Step Back


By Chris Reiter

The prospects of surfing the Internet and receiving e-mail at 35,000
feet took a knock on Thursday as Boeing Co. said it will wind down its
service for offering Internet access on board planes.

Although the market may get a boost with newcomers LiveTV LLC and 
AirCell Inc. developing offerings, cost pressures on airlines make it 
unlikely that on-board Internet access will be widely available soon.

"We've been looking for ways to connect the cabin, but it has to make
sense financially," said Billy Sanez, a spokesman for American
Airlines.  "It's going to be a bit until we see something feasible."

Upgrading an airplane for Internet service is a complex task, and with
fuel prices high, airlines are more focused on keeping costs down
rather than offering new, expensive perks.

"It's kind of like rewiring your office," said airline consultant
Robert Mann. "It creates a lot of downtime and it's very expensive."

The least disruptive option is to have the technology for providing
Internet access built into new planes, but "very few of the large U.S.
carriers are in a position to be buying new airplanes," he said.

After six years, Boeing said on Thursday it would shut down its
loss-making Connexion unit, which allowed airlines to provide
high-speed Internet service to passengers. The satellite-based
service, for which Boeing failed to find a buyer, was too costly, and
few airlines signed on.

The company said it would take charges of up to $320 million to wind
down the service, which analysts estimate attracted just over 1,000
users a day and cost as much as $150 million a year to run.

Boeing becomes the second large company to withdraw from the in-flight
communications market in recent months. In June, Verizon
Communications Inc. said it was canceling its on-board phone service
by the end of the year.

CELL SYSTEM

Hoping to revive the market, AirCell and LiveTV, a unit of low-cost
carrier JetBlue Airways Corp., are planning new in-flight Internet
offerings after winning licenses to operate air-to-ground
communications services in June.

AirCell, which paid $31.3 million for one of the network licenses,
plans to launch its service by the end of 2007, Chief Executive Jack
Blumenstein said on Thursday.

AirCell's service, which would turn planes into flying "hotspots," is
based on cellular technology, giving it an edge over satellite-based
Connexion because the equipment is cheaper and lighter, Blumenstein
said.

For example, AirCell's cellular antenna is about the size of a deck of
cards and weighs less than half a pound (0.2 kg), while Connexion
equipment was bulkier and weighed hundreds of pounds, he said. This
makes it possible to offer the service for under $10 per flight.

LiveTV, which paid $7 million for a smaller-capacity network, is
working on a business plan on how to use the acquired frequency,
JetBlue spokesman Bryan Baldwin said.

The airline is not committed to taking its unit's service, if and when
it does get up and running.

"Just because LiveTV would come out with a product doesn't
automatically mean that JetBlue would get it," Baldwin said.

Stronger demand for such services appears to be from overseas
airlines.  British carrier Virgin Atlantic Airways said this month it
planned to offer an in-flight text service, which will respond to
passenger questions.

Lufthansa, one of Connexion's staunchest backers, said it was on the
lookout for a new partner.

"Lufthansa remains hopeful that new providers will emerge in the
coming months to provide this valuable service to our customers," the
German airline said in a statement.

Since May 2004, Lufthansa has been offering FlyNet, an in-flight
Internet service provided by Connexion, free of charge for its
long-haul business class customers.


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Cyber Bullying problem
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:54:36 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


http://www.kyw1060.com/pages/70467.php?contentType=4&contentId=190171

Online bullying has become a major problem that Pennsylvania law
enforcement is trying to deal with.

A new national survey shows one-third of teenagers and 18 percent of
those aged 6 to 11 have been the victim of a cyberbully -- someone who
goes online and either demeans or threatens a kid, often anonymously.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:47:07 EDT
From: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality 


>> There is a perfectly good definition of net neutrality: everyone who
>> gets the same service pays the same price for it. ... [ particularly
>> the telco's own affiliates ]]

> Sorry, but in today's world, that kind of pricing is all part of the
> "free market".  And a "free market" is what was desired when they took
> away regulation.  If you don't like these kinds of pricing plans, you
> need to go back to a regulated world.  You can't have it both ways.

This must be a new neocon definition of "free market".  Selling
something below cost to drive out competitors in a competitive market
and making up the losses from your profits in a non-competitive market
is the very definition of a predatory monopoly.  It's what led to the
original anti-trust laws being passed over a century ago.

> If the telcos price themselves too high, consumers will find
> alternatives, either a cheaper vendor or alternative technology.

I think you need to read up on natural monopolies.  There's a reason
that nobody does cable system overbuilds, even though they're legal
throughout the country.

R's,

John

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:44:12 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Actually, the 'Great Depression' is 
> normally dated as the last three months of 1929, along with 1930-33.

While the people working in the late 30s had it much better than in
the early parts of the depression, 1/4 to 1/3 of the adult male work
force did not have a steady job as of 12/7/41. What ended the
depression was the war and the massive government spending on said
war. Now what kept it away after the war is the subject of endless
political and economical debates to this day. Although there was a
fairly severe recession/depression in 46/47 as all those GIs came home
with nothing to do until a lot of them decided that college was an
option.

Go to a college where they have the photos on the wall of the
graduating classes. In the KY Engineering college it was amazing to
see the huge spike in the early 50s but the rates stay much higher
than before the war after that due to folks just getting better
educations than the previous generation.

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clueless Hollywood
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:53:50 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


Ron Kritzman wrote:

> I was channel surfing the other night and caught a minute or two of a 
> movie allegedly set in Chicago. In front of Wrigley Field, on the 
> Addison Street side, with the famous red marquee in the background, one 
> of the main characters was making a call from a Verizon pay phone! Who 
> knew? Not subtle either. Big logo with the checkmark and the red Z. 
> C'mon guys, if you're going to do product placement at least place it 
> where it lives.

>       - RK

> Emoveray ethay Igpay Atinlay otay eplyray

Today, I was walking by a 7-11 Store in San Clemente, California.  There 
were two fairly recent Verizon pay phones, complete with Verizon's 
version of Ma Bell's bell logo.

San Clemente has been Pacific Telephone/Pacific Bell/SBC/ and now AT&T 
since the early days.

Verizon is obviously in the pay phone business outside its operating 
territory.

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:01:58 EDT
Subject: Re: City Party Line Service


In a message dated 17 Aug 2006 10:58:36 -0700, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
writes:

> When party lines are discussed, people usually talk about coded
> ringing and that everyone's phone rang with all calls.

> However, in city service this did not occur.

> The panel dial switching system, developed in 1922, included
> provisions for two and four party line service, which were common in
> those days.  Each party had their own listed phone number and could be
> anything, not necessarily consecutive.  There was no need for party
> letters.  When calling a party line, the switchgear deteced the type
> of selective ringing and (bias and ground combinations) and sent out
> the appropriate ringing current.  Only the desired telephone rang.
> This helped privacy since other parties wouldn't know the phone was in
> use.

I'm not sure what the invention of the Panel Type office has to do
with coded ringing on party lines.  There were millions of SxS
connectors that were wired for terminal-per-station ringing, and
full-selective four-party ringing was the norm.

Two-party lines were almost universally full selective, using tip or
ring to ground to cause the property party to ring.

Four-party full selective ringing could also be provided in terminal-
per-line SxS offices, but there were many drawbacks to terminal-per-
line operation.

        
Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching
Reply-To: jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu
Organization: University of Arkansas Alumni
From: haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:03:17 GMT


Also I believe it was exposure to telephone switching apparatus that
led Claude Shannon to realize that Boolean algebra could be useful for
describing and analyzing switching circuits.

A book "The Design of Switching Circuits" by some Bell Labs guys
Keister, Ritchie and Washburn is something of a cookbook of relay
circuits for various purposes.  Then at the end of the book they
introduce some of Shannon's insights for circuit analysis and design.
Shannon's work applied to combinatorial circuits; later it was Huffman
who worked out the application to sequential circuits. 

--

jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #305
******************************

    
    
From prvs=telecom-owner+M2754=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=037868bf10@telecom-digest.org  Fri Aug 18 19:08:03 2006
Return-Path: <prvs=telecom-owner+M2754=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=037868bf10@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42])
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id BA07621B7
	for <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:07:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 5288 invoked by uid 85); 18 Aug 2006 23:05:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 5251 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2006 23:05:41 -0000
Received: from massis.lcs.mit.edu (128.31.0.14)
  by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2006 23:05:40 -0000
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix)
	id 8DC8221C3; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 8308421B9; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #306
Message-Id: <20060818230537.8308421B9@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Reply-To: telecom@telecom-digest.org
List-Help: <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Unsubscribe: (Use this command to get off the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe%20telecom>
List-Subscribe: (Use this command to join the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe%20telecom>
List-Post: <mailto:telecom@telecom-digest.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-telecom@telecom-digest.org> (Contact Person for Help)
List-ID: <telecom.telecom-digest.org>
X-Loop: majordomo
Precedence: bulk
Sender: telecom-owner@telecom-digest.org
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:07:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 306

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    French Organization Plans Suit Against E-Bay (Nick Antonovics, Reuters)
    Apple: No Forced Labor at iPod Plant (Elaine Kutenbach, AP)
    CBS News to Simulcast Online (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Telecom Update #542, August 18, 2006 (John Riddell)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 18, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Michael D. Sullivan)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Sam Spade)
    Re: City Party Line Service (bv124@aol.com)
    Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching (Dennis Ritchie)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Herb Oxley)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:59:29 -0500
From: Nick Antonovics, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: French Organization Plans Suit Against E-Bay


French firms target eBay in anti-counterfeit drive 
By Nick Antonovics

A French industry group plans to file a complaint with prosecutors
seeking damages from eBay Inc. and other Internet auction sites for
the sale of counterfeit products on their Web pages, the group's
chairman said.

Marc Antoine Jamet, chairman of France's Union of Manufacturers
(Unifab), told Reuters that the complaint, due to be filed next month,
also aims at forcing the sites to clamp down on product pirates.

"There is a continent which makes the fakes, which is China, and there
is a continent where they are sold, and that is the Internet," he
said.

Other auction sites in the firing line include those run by privately
held iOffer.com, Yahoo Inc. and Japan's Rakuten, Inc.

But the main focus is eBay, with which Unifab has held more than a
dozen meetings in the last two years, Jamet said.

"We think eBay is perfectly capable of policing its site, but they
offer to take action only after the fact. They refuse to act
pre-emptively," he said.

"We think they have the IT to manage their sites, to track bank
accounts and ownership."

EBay spokesman Hani Duzry said the company operates an anti-counterfeit
goods program and constantly monitors auctions for blatantly
infringing products and removes them.

FOCUS ON EBAY

"We don't allow counterfeit items on the site. It is against eBay
policy. It is illegal. We are committed to working with copyright
owners on this," Duzry said.

Ebay "makes it easy," he said, for any copyright owner to contact eBay 
to report infringing products in order to have eBay remove them.

Jamet said, however, that the firm had refused Unifab's request to
pro-actively shut down merchants of counterfeit goods in the same way
it agreed in 2001 to ban listings of Nazi memorabilia and from groups
such as the Ku Klux Klan.

Unifab's complaint will contain concrete examples of counterfeit goods
found for sale on the Internet, he said.

Leather goods maker Louis Vuitton, a unit of LVMH, the world's largest
luxury goods group, last year found 235,000 examples of counterfeit
articles on 340 eBay pages.

In one case, it tracked more than 100 copies of the same article being
sold within one hour, said Jamet, who is also a senior executive at
LVMH.

Other luxury goods companies are also targets of counterfeiters, while
Unifab members in sectors from pharmaceuticals to spare car parts
support the action, he said.

Unifab had decided to move now, he added, because the problem of
counterfeit sales had exploded.

Three years ago, none of the French firms affected -- including
big-name luxury goods makers such as LVMH, Hermes International and
Chanel -- monitored Internet traffic.

Now, many have teams who have spent months gathering evidence and
assembling a case.

"It's a huge phenomenon, which has multiplied by 25 times in the last
five years," he said.

SEEKING FINES, DAMAGES

Jamet said Unifab would be asking prosecutors to seek damages and
interest from the auction sites in relation to the alleged losses
suffered by the firms. In the case of some luxury goods companies,
these ran into millions of euros, he said.

Unifab also wants to prosecute the sites for providing the means to
resell counterfeit goods, a charge the French luxury goods industry
has successfully brought against shop owners in Beijing's silk market
and on New York's Canal Street.

In addition, it is asking the French government to revise its laws on
electronic commerce to make online auctioneers "co-responsible" for
the goods that are sold on their sites, Jamet said.

Unifab believes its case has been strengthened by a Paris court's
decision in June to fine online search engine Google 300,000 euros
($385,000) over advertisements for counterfeit goods generated by its
sites. Google had based its defense partly on the existing French
e-commerce law.

France is home to much of the world's luxury goods industry and the
French government has taken steps in the past three years to toughen
its laws against counterfeiting.

The government tried last month to broker a friendly solution to the
row between Unifab and the auctioneers, but it was rejected by the
industry group which believed it did not go far enough.

Unifab estimates counterfeiting represents 5 to 9 percent of global
trade, or 200 billion to 300 billion euros a year in lost earnings for
manufacturers. Losses in France alone exceed 6 billion euros, it says.

($1=.7791 Euro)

(Additional reporting by Eric Auchard in San Francisco)

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to: 
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: As the writer points out, E-Bay is one
of the worst offenders. And they do _NOT_ make it easy to report any
problems at their site. If I get one, I get a couple dozen daily
'complaints' from so-called users of E-Bay which allegedly are lodged
against me daily. I have done business with E-Bay exactly one time in
my life; when I sought out and purchased the Nokia GAIT phone several
months ago. Yet, there are dozens of complaints daily saying that I
either 'failed to ship' or 'failed to pay for what I purchased' from
users there. Now, one of the more common, I guess, tactics by phishers
and scammers is to send letters of this sort out, so I could excuse
E-Bay for its role in it, except that (taking E-Bay's web site advice)
to send the offensive email to 'spoof@ebay.com' does no good at all;
in fact, I doubt that is even a working address. I sat here two
afternoons ago, using emacs and Note Pad to gather up a huge number of
those farces which get sent out to whoever on the net is still enough
of an idiot to pay attention to them, and shipped off the whole bunch 
to 'spoof@ebay.com' . About 10 minutes later it all bounced back at
me saying 'spoof' is only used for certain things at E-Bay and my mail
would not get delivered or read. Now, their sister company, PayPal
uses 'spoof@paypal.com' as an address to forward all that crapola to;
but appartently E-Bay does not. I wish a good, reliable honest auction
site could be started on the net.   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:02:15 -0500
From: Elaine Kurtenbach, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Apple: No Forced Labor at iPod Plant


by ELAINE KURTENBACH, AP Business Writer

Apple Computer Inc.'s investigation into claims of poor conditions at
a Chinese iPod factory found no forced labor but revealed that workers
were exceeding the company's limits on hours and days to be worked per
week, the company said Friday.

The company said it was taking immediate steps to resolve that and
other issues.

The probe by the Cupertino, Calif.-based company was in response to a
recent report by a British newspaper, the Mail on Sunday, alleging
that workers at the factory were paid as little as $50 a month and
forced to work 15-hour shifts making the devices.

"The team reviewed personnel files and hiring practices and found no
evidence whatsoever of the use of child labor or any form of forced
labor," Apple said in a report on its Web site that summarized the
findings of its audit of the facility.

However, the probe did find that in many cases workers were exceeding
the company's limits for overtime, which specify a maximum of 60 hours
or six days a week.

"We found no instances of forced overtime," the report said. But it
said weekly limits were exceeded 35 percent of the time in a
seven-month period and that employees worked more than six days in a
row 25 percent of the time.

The company running the factory, which was not named in the report,
was ordered to enforce Apple's overtime limits, it said.

Apple's iconic iPod players are made abroad, mainly in China. The
company has sold more than 50 million iPods since its debut in
2001. The company responded vehemently to the allegations made by the
British newspaper, saying it would not tolerate any violations of its
code of conduct.

Apple said its inspection found that in at least two instances workers
were made to stand at attention for disciplinary reasons.

"Apple has a zero tolerance policy for any instance, isolated or not,
of any treatment of workers that could be interpreted as harsh," the
report said. It said the factory has launched an "aggressive" manager
and employee training program to prevent such behavior.

The probe found the workers assembling iPods were paid at least the
minimum wage, with more than half earning more than minimum wage,
excluding bonuses. Minimum wage for Shenzhen in southern China, where
the factory is thought to be located, is about 800 yuan ($100) a
month.

The factory, which supplies electronics components and accessories to
other companies as well as Apple, is a small city in its own right,
with clinics, recreational facilities, buses and 13 restaurants
serving its 200,000 workers.

While conditions in the factories, cafeterias and most dormitories
were good, the audit found overcrowded or unsuitable conditions at
three offsite leased dormitories that were former factories. To
address the problem, the contractor acquired more land and was
building more dormitories on the factory premises, it said.

Apple has hired Verite, an international consultant on workplace
standards, to continue monitoring conditions at the factory, it said.

"We are committed to ensuring compliance with our Code of Conduct and
will complete audits of all final assembly suppliers of Mac and iPod
products in 2006," the report said. It added that "in cases where a
supplier's efforts in this area do not meet our expectations, their
contracts will be terminated."


Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.


NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:12:43 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: CBS News to Simulcast Online


USTelecom dailyLead
August 18, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/elgwfDtusXaFsQMgCh

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* CBS News to simulcast online
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* AOL restates $584M more in ad sales
* EarthLink looks beyond dial-up
* Qualcomm to snap up Qualphone
* DSL growth surpasses cable's
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Phone Facts Plus -- A Must Have
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Commentary: Speed of Internet connection more relevant than access
* Analysis: Is TV the next big thing in mobile phones?
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* VoIP sees worldwide growth
DIVERSIONS
* Lake Tahoe
* Usher in 'Chicago'? Well, He's No Stranger to Razzle-Dazzle and Hocus-Pocus
* A Harbor Full of History and Sea Lore on Cape Cod
* The Camera for Your Next Family Reunion
* Good Ride in the Badlands
* Detroit's Answer to $3-$4 Gas: New Muscle Cars
* Irish Independence in the 60's, With Affection and Sarcasm, in 'Rocky Roa=
d to Dublin'

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/elgwfDtusXaFsQMgCh

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #542, August 18, 2006
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:50:23 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca

Number 542: August 18, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:

** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** MITEL NETWORKS: www.mitel.com/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

************************************************************

IN THIS ISSUE:

** Internet Use Up but Digital Divides Remain
** Nortel Class Action Settlements Proposed
** MTS Objects to Cabinet's Proposed CRTC Order
** Telus Gives Wireless Service Level Guarantee
** MTS Sells Its Directory Business
** Shaw to Buy Whistler Cable
** Rogers May Appeal 'Comma' Ruling
** Rogers Expands Cablephone Coverage
** Mitec Names New CEO
** Videotron Expands the Broadband Wars
** Boeing Gives Up on Airborne Broadband
** Judge Orders Halt to Bush Wiretaps
** IIC Canada Meeting Set for December

INTERNET USE UP BUT DIGITAL DIVIDES REMAIN: Statistics Canada's latest
Internet Use Survey concludes that 18.8 million adult Canadians
accessed the Internet for personal non-business purposes in 2005, and
that two-thirds of home users logged on every day. The study also
found significant disparities in Internet usage between specific
population groups.

** Urban: 68%. Rural: 58%.
** Household income over $86,000: 88%. Under $86,000: 61%.
** Some secondary education: 88%. High school or less: 49%.
** Adult use in households with children: 81%. Without children: 61%.
** Age 18 to 44: 85%. Age 45 or older: 50%.

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/060815/d060815b.htm

NORTEL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS PROPOSED: Plaintiffs in U.S. and
Canadian class actions, alleging that Nortel misled investors about
earnings, have agreed to a settlement totaling US$808 million in cash,
and other benefits. The settlement still requires court and regulatory
approvals. Details (including claim forms and deadlines) are available
at www.nortelsecuritieslitigation.com.

** The proposal affects investors who bought Nortel shares or
   options during two periods: October 24, 2000, through
   February 15, 2001, and April 24, 2003, through April 27,
   2004.

MTS OBJECTS TO CABINET'S PROPOSED CRTC ORDER: MTS Allstream, commenting
on Cabinet's proposed policy direction to the CRTC (see Telecom Update 
#534) says it "agrees wholeheartedly" with the goals expressed, but
objects that the section on wholesale services will be anticompetitive
if implemented as drafted.

http://www.mts.ca/commentsaug16/

TELUS GIVES WIRELESS SERVICE LEVEL GUARANTEE: Telus Mobility says it
will provide credits on customer accounts if it fails to provide a
dropped-call ratio lower than 1% or "fast" response to customer service
calls.

MTS SELLS ITS DIRECTORY BUSINESS: Manitoba Telecom has agreed to sell
its directories business to Yellow Pages Group for $281 million.

SHAW TO BUY WHISTLER CABLE: Shaw Communications has agreed to buy
Whistler Cable, which provides TV and Internet access services to the
B.C. resort town, for an undisclosed sum. (See Telecom Update #541)

ROGERS MAY APPEAL 'COMMA' RULING: The Globe and Mail reports that
Rogers Communications is "strongly considering" appealing a CRTC
ruling that, based on the placement of a single comma in an
Aliant-Rogers contract, allowed Aliant to end the agreement early. The
ruling results in Rogers paying significantly higher rates for access
to N.B. Power poles.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-45.htm

ROGERS EXPANDS CABLEPHONE COVERAGE: Rogers Cable says it is extending
residential cablephone service to several small cities in Ontario,
including Belleville, Chatham, Milton, Trenton, and Welland.

MITEC NAMES NEW CEO: Mitec Telecom has named former Ericsson VP Daniel
Piergentili as President and CEO, replacing Keith Findlay. Findlay had
held the post since October 2005, when Mitec undertook a review of
"strategic alternatives." (See Telecom Update #502)

VIDEOTRON EXPANDS THE BROADBAND WARS: On September 7, Videotron will
start upgrading its High-Speed Internet Service from 5.1 Mbps to 7 Mbps.
(See Telecom Update #541)

BOEING GIVES UP ON AIRBORNE BROADBAND: The Boeing Company is abandoning
its six-year effort to convince airlines to install a system that
provides satellite-based Internet access to passengers during flights.
The company will close down Connexion by Boeing this year and take a
US$320 million charge.

JUDGE ORDERS HALT TO BUSH WIRETAPS: A U.S. court has ruled that the
warrantless wiretaps run by the U.S. National Security Agency are
unconstitutional, and ordered them halted immediately. Implementation of
the injunction has been stayed pending an appeal by the Justice
department.

** This ruling may affect a related lawsuit against telephone
   companies for cooperating with the NSA. (see Telecom Update #540, 541)

IIC CANADA MEETING SET FOR DECEMBER: The Canadian Chapter of the
International Institute of Communications will hold its annual
conference in Ottawa, December 4-5, under the theme "Communications in
2010." For information go to http://www.iic-canada.ca.

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE

E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There
are two formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the
   World Wide Web late Friday afternoon each week
   at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.

   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:
      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send
   an e-mail message to:
      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail addresses to any
   third party. For more information, see
   http://www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html .

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further
information, including permission to reprint or reproduce, please
e-mail jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from
sources which we believe to be reliable, but Angus
TeleManagement makes no warranties or representations
whatsoever regarding accuracy, completeness, or adequacy.

Opinions expressed are based on interpretation of available
information, and are subject to change. If expert advice on
the subject matter is required, the services of a competent
professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 18, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:42:37 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 18, 2006
********************************

U.K. Regulator Proposes New Broadband Switching Rules
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19419?11228

     Ofcom has unveiled new proposals aimed at making it easier for
     customers to switch broadband providers. It proposes to formalise
     the switching process, by making it mandatory for broadband
     providers to supply customers with a Migration Authorisation Code
     (MAC) required for switching. In addition, the regulator plans to
     create a ...

Training Cable's Front Line
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19412?11228

     The secret to keeping customers is keeping customers satisfied.
     That's especially true of the ones who are unhappy, the ones who
     call with a problem. That means your first line of defense is
     manned by customer service reps, installers and repair
     technicians.  And that historically has been one suspect front
     line. Among U.S. ...

Auction 66 Tops $10 Billion in Bidding
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19410?11228

     WASHINGTON -- Bidders with established wireless or wireline
     networks are emerging as the dominant players in the FCC's
     Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) auction.  After 20 rounds, total
     bidding for the spectrum topped $10 billion. T-Mobile USA and
     Verizon Wireless were at the top, followed by Sprint's
     partnership with cable ...

Bidders Line Up For Verizon's Leavings
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/105/19407?11228

     Reports surfacing this week say several telephone holding
     companies are interested in purchasing Verizon Communications'
     landline network assets in some New England and Midwest states,
     assets the incumbent carrier said in May would be on the block.
     FairPoint Communications, CenturyTel and Citizens Communications
     are among ...

WiMax's Small Steps to Security
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19404?11228

     Sprint Nextel Corp.'s decision last week to spend $3 billion on a
     new high-speed wireless network gear catapulted WiMax right into
     the public eye. But what Sprint didn't talk about -- and is less
     well understood -- is what security measures will protect users
     who move over to the broadband wireless network. Analysts, ...

Wireless Pause Pesters Ericsson, Lucent
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19402?11228

     Wireless equipment sales are reaching a pause for Ericsson AB,
     but it's no cause for long-term concern, analysts say.  Ericsson
     is troubled by GSM and UMTS spending, which in North America
     'may be below plan due to some near-term digestion of
     capacity,' analyst Mark Sue of RBC Capital Markets writes in
     a report issued ...

Draft n Products Debut in 2Q06: WLAN End-Product and Chipset Vendors
Off and Running in the Midst of IEEE 802.11n Standard Drama
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19400?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- Although the much-heralded IEEE 802.11n WLAN
     standard is probably a good year away from formal ratification,
     end-products based on Draft 1.0 of the standard were released from a
     handful of vendors in 2Q06. Approximately 300 thousand total Draft n
     routers, clients and access points shipped out from home and SMB ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: Michael D. Sullivan <userid@camsul.example.invalid>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:53:58 GMT


I love the "Net Neutrality" debate.  Both sides define the term
differently and then talk past each other.  Congress has no clue.
Senator Stevens' famous speech against "Net Neutrality" actually made
a good case for it, as the proponents of NN define it.

As the NN proponents define it, I favor it.  Of course I don't want
Verizon or SBC throttling Google or Amazon traffic in favor of their
own competing services.  But that's not what the NN opponents are
supposedly seeking -- and frankly they'd be slitting their own throats
if they tried it.  They want the ability to offer new services that
require better, more reliable, less latent connections than the
standard Internet can offer, citing telemedicine and various emergency
services.  More likely IPTV and IPTelephony, in my view.  For example,
if you have a fiber to your home and pay for some ungodly amount of
bandwidth, 7, 10, or even 30 Gbps, there is still lots of unused
capacity on that fiber.  It stands to reason that the fiber owner
should be able to take advantage of that extra capacity (beyond what
is needed for standard Internet connectivity) to offer access to
telephony, HDTV, and gaming services (as well as the telemedicine and
emergency services) at higher quality levels than if they had to
contend for bandwidth with random Internet downloads, etc.  If NN
threatens that, as the NN opponents claim, I hate it.  And some of the
legislation regarding NN goes well beyond Internet access, potentially
covering all sorts of broadband services.

This exchange illustrates the point, to some degree:

On 8/17/2006 8:35 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> Larry Dignan wrote:

>> 3. All traffic isn't created equal. An e-mail doesn't have the same
>> service requirements as a VOIP call. An X-ray of a heart patient
>> should have priority over a Britney Spears video. Corporate networks
>> manage traffic that way, and at some point there has to be some
>> intelligence added to public Internet infrastructure between the end
>> points. Net neutrality requirements mean all traffic is created
>> equal. You can debate over who makes the call over what traffic gets
>> priority, but to pretend all traffic is equal doesn't hold up.

> When you do this, what you have isn't the internet any more.

And why should all traffic be the Internet?  Isn't there a legitimate
role for broadband service that isn't Internet access?

> The beauty and the failing of the net is that everyone is equal and every
> device is treated like every other device.  Unfortunately this is not a good
> thing to carry realtime data.

Absolutely correct.

> There have been attempts to do what you describe with QoS management,
> where some kinds of traffic gets treated differently than other kinds
> of traffic.  In general, these things don't work very well, because
> the underlying protocol isn't designed for it.

If the IP protocol isn't good for some particular service, why should we 
have to force the provider to use it because everyone on the Internet does?

> If you want a largescale nationwide network to handle realtime data
> like VOIP, video traffic, and high resolution X-rays at the same time,
> it ought to be built very differently than the Internet.  Because the
> Internet just isn't built for that.  Sorry.  

But the NN bills could very well foreclose building a network "very
differently from the Internet."  NN would bar, say, SBC from offering
instant, no-latency access to video, telephony, and (of course) HD
X-rays over the same fiber that offfers Internet access to Google and
Amazon without the no-latency frills.


Michael D. Sullivan
Bethesda, MD (USA)
(To reply, change example.invalid to com in the address.)

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:31:58 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


Patrick Townson wrote:

> Why in the hell weren't these people stopped dead in their tracks
> before they moved in and took over?  PAT

Because they are the ruling class who control politicans and judges.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You are probably correct on that. PAT]

------------------------------

From: bv124@aol.com
Subject: Re: City Party Line Service
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:12:10 -0700


Back in the late '60's and early '70's, in Carbondale, IL (GTE), we
had what was called "suburban" service as we were fifty (50) feet
outside the city limits.  This was a ten (10) party line where each
line rang uniquely (no coded ringing.)  When you dialed a toll call
(1+), an operator came on the line and asked for the number you were
calling from for billing purposes!

I think it was a SxS office.  

------------------------------

From: Dennis Ritchie <dmr@bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:21:42 -0000
Organization: Bell Labs


Jim Haynes <haynes@alumni.uark.edu> wrote in message
news:telecom25.305.8@telecom-digest.org:

> Also I believe it was exposure to telephone switching apparatus that
> led Claude Shannon to realize that Boolean algebra could be useful for
> describing and analyzing switching circuits.

Shannnon's start with this was his MS thesis in the 1930s, but of
course he could have been exposted to phone switching before he was at
Bell Labs.

> A book "The Design of Switching Circuits" by some Bell Labs guys
> Keister, Ritchie and Washburn is something of a cookbook of relay
> circuits for various purposes.  Then at the end of the book they
> introduce some of Shannon's insights for circuit analysis and design.
> Shannon's work applied to combinatorial circuits; later it was Huffman
> who worked out the application to sequential circuits. 

Actually, there's tons of stuff about sequential circuits in KR&W, of
which I have multiple copies, including Keister's personal copy signed
by the authors.  I helped empty his house when he moved to Cape Cod
and he gave it to me -- and the Ritchie was my father.

The book was published in 1951, and the thing it doesn't have much
about is transistor (let alone integrated) circuits.  About as much
space (a few pages) is on cold-cathode tubes.


Dennis

------------------------------

From: nospam4me@mytrashmail.com (Herb Oxley)
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:18:36 UTC
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote:

> And even on the odd chance you're planning a thousand bombs, you'd
> need enough other supplies that you could buy them three at a time,
> you wouldn't walk into a store and buy 80+ .

My guess is the Feds think these guys were part of a conspiracy to
acquire Tracfones to use in Iraq.

Does anyone know whether Tracfone offers service in Iraq -- or is it
fairly easy to load an "image" from an Iraqi cell provider onto them?

Now in the case of the 3 guys who got busted Uncle Sam is going to
have to prove they knew what the phones were going to be used for.

Now something that strikes me odd about this case: It was reported
that Wal-mart has a company policy which limits sales of prepaid
cellphones to three per customer per day.

Wal-mart leaves as little as possible to cashier discretion; for
example a cashier is prompted to "verify age" when they scan in an
age-restricted product such as alcohol, tobacco or M-rated[1]
videogames.

Thus I'd expect the Wal-mart POS system to complain if someone was
buying more than 3 prepaid phones on the same transaction.

Sure this could be worked around, however why would a cashier risk
their job to "structure" a big buy of prepaid phones by doing 27
separate transactions?

I bet we'll soon see the FCC ban anonymous sales of prepaid phones;
that is a government issued ID will be needed to buy phones and top-up 
cards and records will have to be kept to be provided on request to the 
FBI.

[1] In the USA, videogames are rated by the Entertainment Software
Rating Board <http://www.esrb.org>, a voluntary association of game
manufacturers.

Games rated "M" aren't recommended for players under 17 due to subject
matter, vulgar language, graphic violence, drug/alcohol/tobacco
references, sex and nudity.  Wal-mart company policy requires
purchasers of M-rated games to be 17+.

-- 
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Herb Oxley
 From: address IS Valid.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #306
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Aug 19 21:29:42 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 1E26B21F4; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:29:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #307
Message-Id: <20060820012942.1E26B21F4@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:29:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:31:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 307

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    What do People Search For on the Web? (Lee Gomes, Wall Street Journal)
    VoicePulse Setup (cliff@thesolutioncafe.com)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested (Neal McLain)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: City Party Line Service (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching (Jim Haynes)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:26:26 -0500
From: Lee Gomes <wsj@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: What do People Search For on the Web?


PORTALS
By LEE GOMES

What Are Web Surfers Seeking? Well, It's Just What You'd Think

One thing about us Internet users: We like our music, we like our
pictures, we like our sex -- and we like them all free.

Last week, AOL released a trove of what it thought were anonymous
Web-search data from 650,000 of its customers. While intending to help
researchers, AOL instead set off a privacy controversy because some of
the users could, in fact, be tracked down. But taking up AOL on its
original intentions, I got hold of the data set -- 2.27 gigabytes'
worth, loaded it into my shiny new SQL Server database software, and
started my own research project into how people really use the Web.

One learns, for instance, that excepting prepositions and
conjunctions, the most commonly used word in the 17.15 million
separate searches was "free." If something isn't free, it better at
least be "new," as that was the next-most common word.

Excluding proper nouns, the next most popular words were "lyrics,"
"county," "school," "city," "home," "state," "pictures," "music,"
"sale," "beach," "high," "map," "center" and "sex."

Ah, sex. The Web turns out to be every bit the domain of the unbounded
id we always thought it was. According to a research paper about the
data prepared by an AOL-led team, porn was the third most common
activity of Web searchers, behind entertainment and shopping. My study
showed that 14% of all users made some form of explicit sexual search.
And sex was No. 44 on the list of Greatest Hits words; usually, it's
around 2,500 for standard usage, such as in English-language novels.

Among the sex searchers, there were 50,549 inquires for nude pictures.
Perhaps for the first time in Internet history, the person most
requested wasn't Pamela Anderson. In fact, it wasn't even a woman, but
Peter Wentz, boyish singer of pop group Fall Out Boy. Ms. Anderson was
second, followed by Paris Hilton.

How good is the Web with queries not involving naked celebrities?
Users seem to think it needs improving, because in 47% of all
searches, they didn't click on any of the results presented to
them. (Although that could also mean they got the answer they needed
just from the information in the list of links they were given.)

The AOL researchers noted that 28% of all searches were refinements of
earlier searches, as users reshaped their queries to make the results
more in sync with what they were looking for.

For those searchers who did click on something, in 42% of the time,
they clicked on the first link presented to them. That factoid
explains why Web sites spend so much money boosting their
search-engine rankings.

In looking through all of the queries, I found 413,638 that were
questions, that is, beginning with one of the five W's. Some 35% of
these questioners never clicked on an answer, though I am not sure
what even the best search engine could have done with a question like,
"How to find your eye color."

How good is the Web at actually answering questions? I took a random
sample of 50 "question" searches, and then visited the Web page that
questioners had clicked on.

By my reckoning, 60% of these sites provided reasonable answers to
what the user wanted to know, which included, "How to propose to a
man," and "How to install more memory in a computer."

Unanswered queries included, "How to potty train a new puppy" and "How
strong are gymnasts." The first went to a company that sold dog food,
the second to a Russian gymnast training school looking to raise
money.

Returning to the list of most frequently used words -- I need to thank
Greg Sadestky of Poly9, fine purveyor of "mash up" map software, for
his help -- "Google" was the 17th most common. While some might scoff
at the notion of "searching for Google," it's actually efficient Web
surfing.  You're relying on the friendly, type-fixing search box,
rather than the unforgiving URL bar at the top of your browser.

In the same vein, don't do what 15% of people in the sample did, and
include the full URL, including "http" and "www" and ".com" in the
search box. It's a waste of time and keystrokes.

The data were collected from March through May. Here are some random
searches, and the numbers for each: Britney Spears -- 3,938; God --
3,279; Madonna -- 1,881; Mother Teresa -- 165; Stephen Hawking -- 41;
Kofi Annan -- 12. While clearly celebrities did well, writers seemed
to fare badly. Indeed, there were no searches at all for such modern
masters as Malcolm Lowry, Martin Amis and Lee Gomes.

Data aside, reading these queries is like listening in on random phone
calls; even if you don't know who is talking, the experience can be
wrenching.

Consider the person who, over the course of a few minutes, searched for 
"What to do when your Christian husband turns away from God," "How to 
deal with mental abuse in a Christian marriage" and "Do I stay or go 
when a Christian husband is on drugs and alcohol."

One of the recommended sites gave thoughtful answers to important life 
questions from an evangelical Christian perspective. The other hawked 
Bible books.

Write to Lee Gomes at lee.gomes@wsj.com

Copyright 2006 Wall Street Journal

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: cliff@thesolutioncafe.com
Subject: VoicePulse Setup
Date: 19 Aug 2006 11:49:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I have a LinkSys PAP2T-NA which I purchased from voipsupply.com and
I'm trying to get it setup to work with VoicePulse. I created a
VoicePulse account using the serial number and MAC for the device and
verified that there is an IP assigned to the Linksys. I then tried to
provision the service on the Linksys with VoicePulse by going to the
URL:

http://a.b.c.d/admin/resync?http://sipura-profiles.voicepulse.com/migrate.xml
as per the VoicePulse instructions. The device rebooted and by going
to the device web page admin panel it looks like it picked up the
VoicePulse information... BUT I can't get a dial-tone. I've opened up
ports 5600 and 5601 on my router. The Linksys phone adapter is running
3.1.9(SLc) firmware. I can get to the Admin screen using the password
12345.

Any ideas? I'm using Adelphia cable but I've also tried routing
through BellSouth.net (I have both broadband services in-house).
VoicePulse tech support says to just buy a device from them but that
costs more and I already have an unlocked device which I can't return.

Thanks for any help. 

Thanks again!

Cliff

------------------------------

From: Neal McLain <nmclain@annsgarden.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested ...
Reply-To: nmclain@annsgarden.com
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:16:10 -0400


nospam4me@mytrashmail.com (Herb Oxley) wrote:

> Wal-mart leaves as little as possible to cashier discretion; for
> example a cashier is prompted to "verify age" when they scan in an
> age-restricted product such as alcohol, tobacco or M-rated [1]
> videogames.

Or even Liquid Nails!

Neal McLain

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:28:48 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges


(Herb Oxley) Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:18:36 UTC wrote:

> My guess is the Feds think these guys were part of a conspiracy to
> acquire Tracfones to use in Iraq.

> Does anyone know whether Tracfone offers service in Iraq -- or is it
> fairly easy to load an "image" from an Iraqi cell provider onto them?

Well, if they did think that either the "terrorists" were stupid or the
Feds were stupid since TracFone won't work anywhere other than in North
America and only works where there's a compatible network none of which
are in Iraq or anywhere else in the Middle East, Asia or Europe for
that matter.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What you say is true, however the
phones could be used to make anonymous calls between 'terrorists' here
in the USA easily enough. So if 'sleeper cell A' needs to coordinate
its activities with 'sleeper cell B' or if either one of them need to
report to or get more instructions from terrorists in Iraq, that would
make the TracFones rather ideal, wouldn't it?   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: City Party Line Service


bv124@aol.com Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:12:10 -0700 wrote:

> Back in the late '60's and early '70's, in Carbondale, IL (GTE), we
> had what was called "suburban" service as we were fifty (50) feet
> outside the city limits.  This was a ten (10) party line where each
> line rang uniquely (no coded ringing.)  When you dialed a toll call
> (1+), an operator came on the line and asked for the number you were
> calling from for billing purposes!

> I think it was a SxS office.

ONI (Operator Number Identification) was the norm for anything above a
two-party line at least for the Bell System or at least it was ...

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Date: 19 Aug 2006 12:10:53 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Actually, the 'Great Depression' is
> normally dated as the last three months of 1929, along with 1930-33.
> I do not think Bell did any central office conversions during that
> time period, or very few of them. Chicago did not start converting
> until 1939, after the depression, when our country was well on the
> way toward recovery (which generally means a war is going on). Many
> of the conversions occurred in the late 1940's and throughout the
> 1950's, and as we know, those were much better times financially for
> almost everyone.    PAT]

Generally, the Depression is started by be the fall of 1929 until about
1939-40.  Although the big stock market crash is generally accepted to
the be the start, for some people hard times started much earlier and
later for others.  Hard times continued until to about 1940 when
defense spending perked up.  There was some natural economic growth in
1939.  There was a slight recovery in 1936-7, but then FDR cut the
budget back and the economy fell down again.

I believe Newark NJ was a major dial conversion around 1930 as was
remaining manual exchanges within New York City and its immediate
developed suburbs (ie Yonkers).

No 1 crossbar came out and was implemented in the 1930s.

Long distance systems continued to be modernized with improved
repeaters and carrier systems.  "AB" dialing for operators and other
processes streamlined the process.

While work at Bell obviously slowed down since so little revenue was
coming in (the stock dividends were paid out of past surplus), it
didn't stop.

Someone else mentioned 25% unemployment even in 1941.  That is too
high.  20-%25% was about the worst the country had (except in some
especially hard hit areas like the Dust Bowl), but other places
weren't quite as hard hit.  By 1939 it was down to about 15%.  That's
still very high but not quite as bad.  It varied quite a bit by region
and industry.  There were some nasty strikes in the late 1930s that
pushed up wages which allowed workers to have more money than mere
sustenance.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Computer "Logic" in 1922 Panel Switching
Reply-To: jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu
Organization: University of Arkansas Alumni
From: haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes)
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:42:35 GMT


In article <telecom25.306.9@telecom-digest.org>, Dennis Ritchie
<dmr@bell-labs.com> wrote:

> Actually, there's tons of stuff about sequential circuits in KR&W, of
> which I have multiple copies, including Keister's personal copy signed
> by the authors.  I helped empty his house when he moved to Cape Cod
> and he gave it to me -- and the Ritchie was my father.

> The book was published in 1951, and the thing it doesn't have much
> about is transistor (let alone integrated) circuits.  About as much
> space (a few pages) is on cold-cathode tubes.

I agree there is lots about sequential circuits -- my argument is that
the approach used in KR&W is more of a cookbook approach -- circuits
that have been worked out to solve specific problems -- and that it
was Huffman who worked out the way to analyze sequential circuits
using Boolean algebra.


jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #307
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sun Aug 20 23:54:45 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id E5F80221E; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #308
Message-Id: <20060821035444.E5F80221E@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:55:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 308

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Court Blocks Order to Turn Off Dish DVRs (Patrick Townson)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested ... (DLR)
    Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges (DLR)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Mark Crispin)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Joseph Singer)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (Lisa Hancock)
    P.S. on Dial Conversion in the Depression (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: City Party Line Service (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: City Party Line Service (Anthony Bellanga)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:16:10 -0500
From: David Koenig, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Court Blocks Order to Turn Off Dish DVRs


By DAVID KOENIG, AP Business Writer

EchoStar Communications Corp. rushed to a federal appeals court Friday
in a successful bid to avoid shutting down more than 3 million digital
video recorders used by customers of its Dish satellite-TV service.

But the victory could be only temporary. EchoStnar is fighting an
uphill battle against TiVo Inc., which convinced a jury in April that
EchoStar infringed on its patented TV-viewing technology in making
set-top boxes for Dish customers.

Late Thursday, the federal district court judge who presided over the
trial also sided with TiVo. He issued an injunction ordering EchoStar
to stop selling the recorders and to turn off machines already in
customers' homes within 30 days.

Judge David Folsom also ordered EchoStar to pay TiVo $89.6 million in
damages — more than the $74 million the jury awarded.

The ruling helped push TiVo shares up more than 8 percent Friday.
Investors kept bidding the shares higher even after a federal appeals
court in Washington temporarily blocked the order to disable
EchoStar's video recorders.

The appeals court said that it wasn't ruling on the merits of the
case, only that it wanted more time to study whether the injunction
should be delayed until appeals can be heard.

Meanwhile, EchoStar finds itself under attack in a Florida court on a
separate issue that could also force it to curtail services to Dish
customers.

EchoStar asked the Florida judge to delay until Sept. 11 an order that
Dish stop selling signals of distant network stations — for
example, a customer in Dallas who wants to receive broadcasts from
ABC, CBS, NBC or Fox affiliates in New York or Los Angeles. The judge
denied the request.

A EchoStar spokeswoman, Kathie Gonzalez, said the company had appealed
to the U.S. Supreme Court and was negotiating with broadcasters who
had sued EchoStar to prevent customers from losing their distant
programming.

Both cases hold the potential to cost Dish customers, but the TiVo
affair is easily the more serious, said analyst Matthew Harrigan of
Janco Partners Inc.

"There is absolutely no way they can turn off those (recording) boxes
without getting blind-sided. They would lose a lot of customers,"
Harrigan said. "People who use those boxes really like them. They
would be furious."

That was the argument EchoStar lawyers made in asking the appeals
court in Washington to block Judge Folsom's injunction. Forcing Dish
to disable those boxes would force customers to give up a treasured
service or find new video-recording service from another provider, the
lawyers said.

EchoStar said it continued to believe it didn't infringe TiVo's patent
for "time-warp" technology the ability to record a live television
program while playing another. But EchoStar also said it was working
on modifications to its recorders to avoid future claims of patent
infringement.

Gonzalez, the spokeswoman for Englewood, Colo.-based EchoStar, said
more than 3 million of Dish's 12.5 million subscribers use an EchoStar
recorder that would have been affected by Folsom's ruling. Dish is the
nation's second-largest satellite-TV provider, behind DirecTV.

If the Texas judge's $89.6 million award stands up on appeal, it would
represent about half a year's revenue for TiVo, which hasn't earned a
profit since its founding in 1997. The potential boon could be seen
Friday in Alviso, Calif., company's stock price.

TiVo shares rose 53 cents, or 8.2 percent, to close the day at $7.02
on the Nasdaq Stock Market. EchoStar shares dropped 30 cents, or just
under 1 percent, to $32.45.

TiVo hopes that a victory against EchoStar will convince other cable
and satellite-TV providers that sell digital video recorders, or DVRs,
other than TiVo's to agree to pay royalties and licensing fees to the
company whose name is synonymous with recording TV on a hard drive.

TiVo has a licensing agreement with the nation's largest satellite-TV
provider, DirecTV, which has 3 million TiVo users. A deal with Comcast
Corp., which has more than 23 million cable-TV subscribers, is set to
begin in the fourth quarter. TiVo is still chasing deals with the
other leading cable providers.

"The company on its own is running OK," said Daniel Ernst, an analyst
for Soleil Securities. "Prevailing against EchoStar isn't necessary
for their success and growth, but certainly it would be a nice
catalyst."

The appeals court gave TiVo until next Wednesday to respond to
Friday's move blocking the injunction against EchoStar.

The case is far from over. Even TiVo could appeal.

The Texas judge could have tripled the jury's $74 million award
because jurors found that EchoStar willfully infringed TiVo's
patent. TiVo is considering seeking a larger award on appeal, said
spokesman Elliot Sloane.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:00:30 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested ...


Neal McLain wrote:

> nospam4me@mytrashmail.com (Herb Oxley) wrote:

>> Wal-mart leaves as little as possible to cashier discretion; for
>> example a cashier is prompted to "verify age" when they scan in an
>> age-restricted product such as alcohol, tobacco or M-rated [1]
>> videogames.

> Or even Liquid Nails!

More and more companies will do this. Not doing so and having a
cashier make an "illegal" sale opens you up to a lawsuit in this
country. If you watch TV after midnight, you'll see multiple ads per
hour prompting you to file a lawsuit for money.

[Pat, why not leave the [telecom] IN the subject so replies will get it 
automatically?]

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:19:23 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges


> Where will it end?

> The US seems well on the way to the old Czarist model, where
> _everything_ was _forbidden_ unless explicitly allowed by the authorities.

Prior to 1960 or so, you could buy an amazing collection of things
from the drug store. Somewhere I have a book from the 50s on the hobby
of rocket design. It contains some interesting mixes for fueling
rockets.  And this was not Estes, this was the real McCoy. And if you
paid attention in high school chemistry and did a little
experimenting, you could make some really big bangs. Pipe bombs were
easy. Then (and I don't know all the reasons for sure) with the
radical bombings and such plus a general "is this really a smart
things to be selling" they gradually withdrew such things. Plus some
laws were passed.

Now buying saltpeter, magnesium, mercury, etc ... it a wee bit harder.

Where should we set the limits?

Jerry Pournelle wrote a series of SciFi books a while back about this
very thing. US and USSR made a co-existence pack and basically shut
down research into anything that anyone thought might be dangerous.

As to my personal experiences, the drug store supply was gone by the
time I got to high school chemistry in 1970, but my cousin (10 years
older) got to have some fun. The only check was the druggist asked the
local teacher if it was ok and the teacher told him to trust my
cousin.  Personally I think we were in more danger around the holidays
than we knew. :)

Here's the Estes mentioned above:
http://www.estesrockets.com/

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <mrc@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date:  Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:50:09 -0700
Organization: University of Washington


On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> Well, if they did think that either the "terrorists" were stupid or the
> Feds were stupid since TracFone won't work anywhere other than in North
> America and only works where there's a compatible network none of which
> are in Iraq or anywhere else in the Middle East, Asia or Europe for
> that matter.

Not necessarily.

TracFones are GSM, TDMA, or CDMA depending upon the region.  Even if
the GSM phones are GSM 850/1900, that's still useful elsewhere in the
Americas once the phone is unlocked (note that TracFone itself is a
subsidiary of America Movil, a Latin America mobile phone company).

There are several countries overseas in which CDMA phones will work
(including Israel).

However, the number one reason for bulk buying TracFones is that the
packages can be broken up.  The SIM cards (in GSM phones) have airtime
that is generally worth the cost of the phone, and the battery and
charger sold separately is worth that again.

Either the phone is tossed out, or if unlocked is again reusable on
the secondary market.  Unlike some European countries, it is perfectly
legal to unlock a phone; when you buy a phone in the US, title to the
physical phone transfers to the purchaser even if the purchase price
was heavily subsidized.  Without a contract (and since it's prepay
there's no contract), there's really no legal recourse for the prepay
company if the purchaser unlocks the phone and resells it.

TracFone attempted to claim a DMCA violation against one unlocker (Sol
Wireless Group), but I don't think that got anywhere.

Strange to say, though, unlocking is not a big thing in the US the way
it is in Europe.  Most unlocked phones sold in the US are from
Europe...

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:42:44 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to a writer:

>> Well, if they did think that either the "terrorists" were stupid or
>> the Feds were stupid since TracFone won't work anywhere other than
>> in North America and only works where there's a compatible network
>> none of which are in Iraq or anywhere else in the Middle East, Asia
>> or Europe for that matter.

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What you say is true, however the
> phones could be used to make anonymous calls between 'terrorists' here
> in the USA easily enough. So if 'sleeper cell A' needs to coordinate
> its activities with 'sleeper cell B' or if either one of them need to
> report to or get more instructions from terrorists in Iraq, that would
> make the TracFones rather ideal, wouldn't it?   PAT}

Well, that can be said for any prepaid service since you are not
required to register any of them.  If people wish to do nefarious
deeds you may make it more difficult for them, but you're not going to
stop them.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality
Date: 20 Aug 2006 18:46:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


John L wrote:

> This must be a new neocon definition of "free market".  Selling
> something below cost to drive out competitors in a competitive market
> and making up the losses from your profits in a non-competitive market
> is the very definition of a predatory monopoly.  It's what led to the
> original anti-trust laws being passed over a century ago.

The philosophy behind the passage of anti-trust laws a century ago is
very different today.  We have mega mergers in all sorts of industries
that wouldn't have been tolerated years ago.  We do not regulate
business as we did 100 years ago.  Back then "rebates" on railroad
shipments were considered wrong, today it's everyday business on
airlines.  "Sweetheart deals" are perfectly acceptable.

Again, the philosophy today products may be priced at whatever the
traffic will bear.  I don't like some of the business practices that
has resulted from that principle, but that's the way it is.

As to "predatory", there are numerous examples of big companies using
their better economies of scale and logistics to squeeze out
competitors.  If a big drugstore chain squeezes out a mom 'n pop
pharmacy, so it goes.  If a huge retailer forces its suppliers to take
a very tiny profit supplying it (as opposed to no profit at all and
idle factories), so it goes.  This happens everyday now.

We've had discount airlines kill old companies because they offered
seats at a loss.  Companies use "loss leaders" all the time to attract
customers.  All legal.

If a company feels it has been slighted, it may take legal action.  I
object to pre-conditions, which I feel some "net neutrality" efforts
are.

In other words, if the old line phone companies use their existing
economies of scale and existing customer base to build up subscribers
to new businesses, that's perfectly fine.  That's what everyone else
does.

> I think you need to read up on natural monopolies.  There's a reason
> that nobody does cable system overbuilds, even though they're legal
> throughout the country.

No, not anymore.  Public policy today is that a newcomer can come in,
if not, too bad.  We've been told for years the big evil Bell Companies
have a "natural monopoly" and nobody could cut into their guarnateed
business.  That's a lie.  Cable companies laid their own fibre and now
often full service; many people no longer have any connection to the
classic Bell Companies (the NYT reported on this).   So now the old
Bell System companies has a ton of obsolete plant and losing business.
Why do we need protection from that?  Why did Verizon's stock decline
to half?

Having a "natural monopoly" didn't stop MCI from coming in and
skimming off the cream of the Bell System.  Where it was too expensive
it demanded -- and received -- cheap interconnection.

The old "Ma Bell" died in 1983.  The myth -- perpetuated to this day
in TV ads -- of the big powerful telcos is nonsense.  Whoever is
running those false TV ads (they keep their name in too fine print to
read) is the ones we consumers need to be protected against.

[public replies please]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: P.S. on Dial Conversion in the Depression
Date: 20 Aug 2006 18:51:13 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I checked the book "Telephone" by John Brooks.  It confirmed that dial
conversions indeed went on during the Great Depression.  Indeed, it
was the only thing keeping Western Electric going, otherwise W/E
should have had to shut down -- there was simply no demand.

The Bell System lost half its traffic after 1931.  (Initially traffic
was higher as people adjusted to the effects of the changing economy).
One controversy was that the Bell System kept up its full dividend
even though it had to come from past corporate earnings (surplus)
since no new money was being earned.  If the dividend had been reduced
slightly the money could've been used to keep some of the operators on
who were laid off.  Of course, there was no traffic for them to handle
and was that the Bell System's role -- to create "leaf raking" jobs?
Further, how would've the dividend cut affected public confidence and
critical future financing needs?

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: City Party Line Service
Date: 20 Aug 2006 19:26:17 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> ONI (Operator Number Identification) was the norm for anything above a
> two-party line at least for the Bell System or at least it was ...

Correct.

They could get it (ANI) from two-party lines, but nothing higher.

The earliest "ANI" was in early long distance where a "checking
multiple" was used to confirm the subscriber's number.  (I think this
was with panel).  The operated tested a button and heard a
confirmation tone.  According to the NYT on this, only two instances
of many thousands of calls were incorrect.  I suspect it was more.

In NYC, panel had meters on subscribers lines for message rate
service.  These were also done under manual service, but apparently
the operator had to press a key to register the call and often forget.
Operator timing beyond the 5 minute period was also inconsistent.  I'm
not sure when and how NYC implemented timing and distance on panel
meters (message units), I don't think it was present at the beginning.
Distant calls were intercepted by the operator who placed it as a toll
call with a ticket.  Even then they used some push button consoles.

A later ANI was in Los Angeles with their early (1940s) automatic
ticketing system for short long-distance toll calls.  It was some
hairy tech stuff involving electronics added to the SxS exchanges (see
Bell Eng & Sci history.)

When DDD came out. ONI was needed in a great many places since ANI
wasn't that easy to do.  I wonder if there was any checking.

The modern No. 4 ESS included a link to a TSPS for ONI purposes if ANI
wasn't received, such as from 4 party lines.  Interesting how modern
technology still had to provide backward links to old stuff for
compatibility purposes.

P.S.  NYC converted from 3L to 2L PEN to PE-6 around 1931.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:57:12 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@notchur.biz>
Reply-To: no-spam@no-spam.no-spam
Subject: Re: City Party Line Service


********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.
********************************************************************

bv124@aol.com wrote:

> Back in the late '60's and early '70's, in Carbondale, IL (GTE),
> we had what was called "suburban" service as we were fifty (50)
> feet outside the city limits.  This was a ten (10) party line
> where each line rang uniquely (no coded ringing.)  When you dialed
> a toll call (1+), an operator came on the line and asked for the
> number you were calling from for billing purposes!

> I think it was a SxS office.

This type of party line ringing was called "frequency selective" or
"harmonic" ringing.

Most telcos, especially Bell, have used a standard of 20 Hz for
ringing a phone line. However, by using up to five different
frequencies for ringing each party on the same side of a multi-party
line, you could individually ring the desired party without disturbing
any of the others.

Also, most party line systems split the line set-up in two "halves".
One side of the party line customers have their phones wired "tip to
ground", while the other side of the parties have their phones wired
"ring to ground".

Regardless of the switching equipment (manual, SXS, Panel, XB, ESS,
even digital), you can have fully selective ringing on a 2-party line
since one party is the "ring to ground" while the other party is the
"tip to ground".

Bell telcos rarely if ever used harmonic or tuned or frequency
ringers. Independent telcos have regularly used them, especially on
party line systems of more than 2 or 4 parties, since they frequently
set up 10 or even 20 parties on a line in rural areas.

It was also possible to have fully selective ringing on a 4-party
system by adding "biased" ringing -- i.e., positive bias as well as
negative bias, in addition to the tip vs. ring to ground.

Thus, you could also have an 8-party system where only two parties at
a time would ever hear their bells ring, since you'd only double the
number of parties on a fully selective 4-party system. There would be
coded ringing in addition to the "bias" as well as the "tip vs. ring
to ground". The most common ringing code sets were single ling rings
and double short rings. But there have been others.

Some manual systems had machine controlled ringing. The operator
simply plugged into the desired party and the ringing was controlled
automatically. But in other manual systems, especially magneto, the
operator either pressed a ringing button, or turned a crank (magnet),
and thus could produce almost any combination of possible ringing
patterns.

Most telcos these days have discontinued party line systems, although
some might have grandfathered long time customers under the lower
party line rate. However, in today's environment, since telco does not
own the customer equipment anymore, it is difficult for telco to make
certain that the phones are wired the right way for that particular
party. Sometimes the phone company can do the special wiring trick at
the demarc box outside the house, thus the customer can have several
"standard" wired phones in their house. And with today's plasic
electronic phones, it might be impossible for telco to open up that
piece of sh** to "re-wire" the phone itself for that particular party
line customer.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #308
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Aug 21 21:12:59 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id EFEA8220D; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #309
Message-Id: <20060822011258.EFEA8220D@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:14:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 309

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Campaign Targets Web Crimes Against Kids (Jamie Stengle, AP)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 21, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Verizon Considers News Channel For Long Island (USTelecom dailyLead)
    What's This Telephone Related Item? (Jim Stewart)
    P.S. on Dial Conversion in the Depression (earle robinson)
    Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality (John Levine)
    Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges (David)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Matt Simpson)
    Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Joseph Singer)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:27:25 -0500
From: Jamie Stengle, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Campaign Targets Web Crimes Against Kids


By JAMIE STENGLE, Associated Press Writer

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced a new public service
campaign Monday that will warn teenage girls against posting
information on the Internet that could put them at risk of attack by
child predators.

"Every day, these predators are looking for someone to hurt," Gonzales
said at the 18th annual Crimes Against Children Conference in Dallas.
"Every day, we must educate parents and children about the threat."

About 2,700 law enforcement officials from around the world are
attending the conference, which runs through Thursday.

"We want the front line professionals to be able to go back to their
communities to protect the children in their communities," Gonzales
said. "This conference brings folks together from all parts of the
world and gets them talking with each other."

A third of this year's 180 workshops are focusing on Internet crime,
said Lynn Davis, president and CEO of the Dallas Children's Advocacy
Center, which is hosting the conference with the Dallas Police
Department.

The ad campaign by the Department of Justice, in partnership with the
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children and the Ad Council,
will begin running early next year.

"It's all part of the ongoing effort to educate the public about this
very serious threat," Gonzales said.

According to a Justice Department study, one in seven children using
the Internet has been sexually solicited and one in three has been
exposed to unwanted sexual material. One in 11 has been harassed.

The ad campaign is the latest in a series from the Justice Department.

One that warned about the dangers online was developed in 2004, giving
advice to parents on how to protect their children from Internet
predators. A second series of ads released in 2005 warned teen girls
about forming online relationships with people they don't know.

On the Net:

Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: http://www.dcac.org/
Nat'l Center for Missing & Exploited Children : http://www.missingkids.com/

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 21, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:37:50 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 21, 2006
********************************

NTL-Virgin Offers Free Broadband for Mobile Users
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19438?11228

     NTL-Virgin has become the latest company to offer
     ld free broadband in the United ...

Euro Carriers Maintain M&A Madness
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19425?11228

     It may be the dog days of summer, but there's plenty of M&A
     activity going on across Europe.  Speculation abounds over the
     future of U.K.  Cable operator NTL Group LTD, which is being
     courted by a bunch of private equity firms. (See Reports: Equity
     Firms Approach NTL.) The fate of the company will have a lot to
     do with ...

Mexico Opens VoIP Floodgates
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/110/19424?11228

     Mexico's second-largest cable-TV operator, Cablemas S.A. de C.V.,
     disclosed that, back on July 31, it received fixed-telephony licenses
     covering 13 of Mexico's largest cities -- a licensing landmark
     that could  open the floodgates of competition between cable
     providers and phone companies  in that country, thus threatening
     the ..

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:25:25 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Verizon Considers News Channel For Long Island


USTelecom dailyLead
August 21, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/elrofDtusXaLkCBJEM

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Verizon considers news channel for Long Island
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Three bidders emerge for Verizon's landlines in New England
* Level 3 inks deal with MySpace
* Analysis: Bell Labs caught in middle in Alcatel-Lucent merger
* Comcast's presence in southern Colorado grows via Adelphia acquisition
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Gbps+ Wireless Local Loop: Transforming Last Mile Economics 
HOT TOPICS
* T-Mobile unveils at-home service
* Verizon ramps up rewiring effort in NYC
* Study: Cable may need to spend billions to compete in broadband
* AT&T unveils digital living room package
* Nortel to help push VoIP
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Has digital convergence finally arrived?
* New telecom technology uses blimps for high-speed data, voice communications
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* DT must open broadband lines, EU says
DIVERSIONS
* Going to Napa, but Skipping the Vineyards
* PC's That Are a Lot Smaller Than a Breadbox
* On the Beach but Still on Guard
* 'Snakes on a Plane': That's No Seat Belt Around Your Waist
* The St.-Tropez of Turkey
* Mascot Madness: VW Pulls a Rabbit Out of Its Past
* Rocking the Waters on Music Cruises

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/elrofDtusXaLkCBJEM

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:00:08 -0700
From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jkmicro.com>
Subject: What's This Telephone Related Item?


http://www.grumpyoldgeek.com/PhoneSlug/PhoneSlug.htm

I was cleaning out a desk drawer last night and ran across this item.
It's about .007" wider and thicker than a US quarter.  I can't
remember where I got it, but the Princess phone on the back leads me
to believe it's payphone related.

Anyone want it for their collection (Patrick has first right of refusal)?

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: A long time ago, pay telephones did not
accept money as such; they were operated with 'telephone slugs'; at
least the ones in Chicago were. I know if you wanted to use the pay
phone at Walgreens for example, Walgreens sold the slugs for five
cents each; Illinois Bell redeemed the slugs for four cents each,
which is how the merchant made his commission on pay phones in the
1920's. You bought one or more slugs, depending on your needs, and
used them in the pay phones. When the collector came around each week
or two, he would open the box, dump out the slugs and resell them to
the Walgreens clerk at the discounted rate. Since that time (in the
1920's) there have been other occassions where merchants sold slugs
for the payphones and telco redeemed them to the merchants. Since you
say your example has a 'Princess phone' stamped on it and since it is
approximatly the size of a 25-cent coin, my hunch is it may have been
used for the phones at one of the world's fair's such as New York back
in the 1970's. If you are offering to give it away, yes, I will take
it.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: earle robinson <Earle.Robinson@nothur.biz>
Subject: P.S. on Dial Conversion in the Depression
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:01:23 +0200


(Pat, please mask my email address. Thank you.)

Regarding AT&T dividends in the 30s, and until the breakup in 1983,
the stock was the ultimate 'widows and orphans' holding. The dividend
was sacrosanct. For that reason alone it was virtually impossible ever
to reduce the dividend paid. Any violation of this 'rule' would have
been as if the government stopped paying interest on treasury bonds.

   -er

------------------------------

Date: 21 Aug 2006 03:54:56 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Why I am Opposed to Net Neutrality


> The old "Ma Bell" died in 1983.  The myth -- perpetuated to this day
> in TV ads -- of the big powerful telcos is nonsense.

Oh, wow.  Can I have some of whatever you've been smoking?

R's,

John

------------------------------

Reply-To: David <someone@some-where.com>
From: David <someone@some-where.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:36:05 GMT


DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.308.3@telecom-digest.org:

>> Where will it end?

>> The US seems well on the way to the old Czarist model, where
>> _everything_ was _forbidden_ unless explicitly allowed by the 
>> authorities.

> Prior to 1960 or so, you could buy an amazing collection of things
> from the drug store. Somewhere I have a book from the 50s on the hobby
> of rocket design. It contains some interesting mixes for fueling
> rockets.  And this was not Estes, this was the real McCoy. And if you
> paid attention in high school chemistry and did a little
> experimenting, you could make some really big bangs. Pipe bombs were
> easy. Then (and I don't know all the reasons for sure) with the
> radical bombings and such plus a general "is this really a smart
> things to be selling" they gradually withdrew such things. Plus some
> laws were passed.

> Now buying saltpeter, magnesium, mercury, etc ... it a wee bit harder.

> Where should we set the limits?

(snip)

I remember those days. You could even buy nitric and sulfuric acid at
the drugstore and nearly anything else you wanted from mail order
chemical companies. Those days are gone along with chemistry sets.

What really disturbs me is the removal of some very useful things from
the market because of the litigious society we live in. Today I can
not even buy a torsion spring for my garage door as the lawyers have
made the liability risk for the seller just too great.

David

------------------------------

From: Matt Simpson <net-news69@jmatt.net>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:05:01 -0400


In article <telecom25.306.10@telecom-digest.org>,
nospam4me@mytrashmail.com (Herb Oxley) wrote:

> Now in the case of the 3 guys who got busted Uncle Sam is going to
> have to prove they knew what the phones were going to be used for.

Not necessarily.  The Bush Supreme Court seems to be ruling that Uncle 
Sam doesn't have to prove anything any more.  They can declare them 
"enemy combatants" and lock them up indefinitely, no evidence, no 
charges, no lawyers, no trials.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: And to many of the Brave and Courageous
Police Officers of America, those would seem to be ideal conditions. I
mean, having to find evidence and truth, when innuendo and lies are
much easier to come by and work with is a real nuisance. PAT] 

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges
Date: 21 Aug 2006 12:31:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


DLR wrote:

> Prior to 1960 or so, you could buy an amazing collection of things
> from the drug store. ... they gradually withdrew such things. Plus some
> laws were passed.

Often new products came out that were (and are) perfectly legal but
after experience in the marketplace we realize they are dangerous and
they are pulled.  This has been an ongoing process for the last 100
years.  Conversely, some products once thought dangerous are now sold
everywhere (such as contraceptives).

The military had trouble with moralists in WW II in giving out
contraceptives but they were critical to control the spread of VD
which could ruin an army if unchecked.

The sale of alcoholic beverages varies greatly from state to state,
some states or localities are very restrictive, others are wide open.

I recall an anti-nausea medication, Paregoric, that was OTC years ago
but now is a controlled prescription as an example.

I think nowadays some raw materials to make "speed" (meth) are
restricted.

> Where should we set the limits?

This is been a long ongoing debate in society about balancing
protection against availability about many different products and
services.

We see that now on the 'net; some ISPs restrict the number of postings
to control against spam.  Is that fair?  A good idea?  I find it
annoying if I'm in a prolific mood, but I can see the point of it.

We will undoubtedly have to deal with more controls.

As an aside, keeping to telecom issues:

What does the telephone company require today to establish land line
phone service?  Suppose I refuse to provide a social security number
and want to use a name for which no credit record exists -- but am
willing to put down a large cash deposit in advance.  I can understand
their need for credit safety, but I pay them in advance that is not an
issue.  (Which is how things were done in the old days -- cash
deposits for unknowns).

Will they still give me service or require verifiable background if I
"don't exist"?  How does a kid getting his first phone get service --
how does a kid prove who he is?  (Kids today must have an SSN after
birth and that can prove age.  I think today schools give out photo
IDs which are required by govt agencies to get a driver's license.)

BOTH government and the private sector do not like dealing with
anonymity.  They want audit trails and verified names of customers
even when paying cash.  I opened a storage locker and they demanded a
lot of official ID even though I paid in advance.  Kind of irked me.
If you apply for a job today, they'll run a credit check on you.

BTW, can you still make toll coin calls from a payphone?  They don't
seem to accept coins anymore.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Answering the last part first ... many
pay telephones no longer accept money; you are required to provide
either third-party or some other kind of special billing (i.e. calling
card) number. Now one might think telco would at least reduce the cost
of those calls to what the coin-deposit-paid-in-advance rate would be
under those circumstances (no coins accepted after dark for example)
but telco says no, cannot give those types of discounted rates. In the
past, if telco's customers were imposed upon for reasosn not their own
fault, customers were given the least expensive (i.e. direct dialed)
rate. Telco claims they made that adjustment to the pay phone at the
request of the phone's owner or by 'community demand' (which generally
means the police or some other big-shot politician in the community
requested it.)

If you inquire further, of the 'community' as to why they had this
done, answers will range from 'drug dealers hanging around that phone'
(such as parking lot at 7/Eleven, Walmart store, etc) to the more
contemporary catch-all 'terrorists'; in any event, where a 25 cent
coin is never going to provide an audit trail; third-party or other
special billing will _always_ tell you who did what, and when. In
Chicago, for example, many payphones in inner-city neighborhoods have
been set for 'no coins after dark' for several years, mainly on
account of drug dealers, but 'terrorists' has become much more common
in the past four or five years. 

Those same no-coins-after-dark payphones also are blacklisted by telco
security against overseas calling with calling cards, depending on
your voice accent, color of skin, and destination of your call. Of
course, telco won't tell you the real reasons your calling card is not
accepted; do you think they are fools standing there waiting to get
sued for discriminatory practices? If you _really push hard_ for an
answer as to why your telco-issued calling card cannot be used to call
from a blacklisted payphone (most all of them) to Nigeria, Iraq, Iran,
most any _non-English_ speaking country in the world, then the
operator has been trained to lie to you claiming 'our (name of telco)
credit card is not accepted by the (name of telco) in that country.'
When that happened to me once and I got that lie recited to me by the
operator, I told her I was attempting to make a PAID call ... what the
other country did or did not wish to do with a USA-issued calling card
would have nothing to do with it.

Her supervisor told me that not only were coins-after-dark not an
acceptable (i.e. traceable) method of payment, but even usually
traceable methods of payment (calling card, etc) were unacceptable to
'that country' because of the high incidence of fraud. Nor, it seems
were cellular phones acceptable for those international calls. The
_only_ way calls to those 'high fraud' and or 'high risk of terrorism'
countries could be made was from a _fixed_ landline phone (where the
telco pair in use could be firmly identified later as needed.) I 
resisted the impulse of asking her what about in cases like inner city
Chicago where your 'pair' itself is an open-ended multiple in every
apartment building up and down the alley behind your house ... she 
probably would have had another story to tell me in that case.

Now regards the other part of your letter, children or other
'first-time users' of telco; how do they get service, etc?  Well Lisa,
I remember quite well, as you must, in the 1950-60's when you called
the business office to get a phone installed, the 'telephone man' came
out the same day or the next morning at latest, put it in and turned
it on. There were no questions asked; there were no credit limits set;
that was your business. And although they appreciated getting payment
within a few days of when they mailed your bill, nothing was said
until at least two months went by; then an inquiry was made. There
were _never_ any inquiries made at the credit bureau, nor were any
reports made to the bureaus. Telco worked exclusively from its own
internal records. If they had no record, or the record said something
negative, then they _might_ ask you for the first month in advance to
get service turned on. Or maybe not ...  and there certainly was no
inquiry ever made about your social security number. But if a child's
parents had been telco customers for some period of time, that was
considered good enough for telco. Would you believe I have _never_
been asked to pay a deposit (either for first month of service or to
keep in escrow) by telco until a few years ago.  That is because when
my first phone was installed in 1960-61 or thereabouts, the fact that
my parents had had phone service for thirty years prior to that was
considered 'good enough'. 

Now the other day, I decided to call AT&T to inquire about some sort
of promotional deal I got in the mail; they refused to discuss it at
all until they had my street address and social security number which
I refused to give them. I guess things are changing a lot.   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:12:37 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges


Mark Crispin <mrc@cac.washington.edu>  Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:50:09 -0700
wrote:

> TracFones are GSM, TDMA, or CDMA depending upon the region.  Even if
> the GSM phones are GSM 850/1900, that's still useful elsewhere in the
> Americas once the phone is unlocked (note that TracFone itself is a
> subsidiary of America Movil, a Latin America mobile phone company).

TracFones whether GSM, CDMA or IS-136 "TDMA" all have special unique
firmware in the handset that debits the account rather than as in
traditional prepaid where all the account debiting is done in the
operator's billing system.  This is why some older TracFones do not
debit for incoming text messages while the newer models do.  The only
way you can use handsets that were for Net10 or TracFone outside of
their systems is if you have them reflashed with generic non-Net10 or
TracFone specific firmware.  Even though TracFone has GSM in many
places you cannot take a regular SIM and insert it into a TracFone
even if the SIM "subsidy" lock is defeated.  In other groups it has
been discussed and some think that you cannot even use a Net10 or
TracFone handset interchangeably even though they both use the same
handset-based debiting/charging system.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #309
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Aug 22 15:52:37 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 3661E21FB; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:52:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #310
Message-Id: <20060822195237.3661E21FB@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:52:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:55:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 310

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Verizon Pockets New DSL Fee Instead of Government (Reuters News Wire)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 22, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Cisco Buys Arroyo (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Cellular Roaming Tariffs (rbc310@gmail.com)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Mark Crispin)
    Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges (Lis Hancock)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (DLR)
    Re: What's This Telephone Related Item? (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:28:34 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Verizon Pockets New DSL Fee Instead of Government


Verizon Communications has decided to pocket most of the savings from
the cancellation of a government surcharge on digital subscriber
lines, despite calls from consumer groups to pass on the savings on to
users.

Verizon, one of the biggest U.S. telecoms companies, used to charge
DSL customers a monthly fee of $1.25 or $2.83, depending on connection
speeds, for a government fund to help bring service to lower-income
and rural areas.

The government stopped charging that fee on August 14, but Verizon 
will instead impose a new monthly surcharge of $1.20 or $2.70, beginning 
August 26, which it said was to help subsidize connection costs.

"There's a lot of cost associated with the service and this is a way
we've elected to recover a portion of that cost," said Verizon
spokeswoman Bobbi Henson on Tuesday.

By introducing the new surcharge as the previous fee ended, Verizon
hoped to minimize the impact on customers, she said.

But consumer groups like the Consumer Federation of America said DSL
customers should not have to pay a new fee.

"They charge so much for that already. The simple fact is they have
market power," said Mark Cooper, an official at the Consumer
Federation of America.

Verizon's latest earnings report in August showed it had a total 6.1
million broadband customers, although 375,000 were connected to its
more advanced fiber-optic network called FiOS.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 22, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:04:00 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 22, 2006
********************************

Comcast Denies Need for Major Upgrade
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19458?11228

     Comcast chief financial officer John Alchin has disputed recent
     industry speculation that it needs to undertake a major network
     upgrade to keep up with the likes of AT&T and Verizon, both
     of which are investing billions of U.S. dollars in FTTx
     roll-out. Alchin said that technologies such as digital simulcast
     or switched video would ...

Billing for Bundles: The Once and Future King
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19456?11228

     ONCE UPON A TIME, resellers were singleline businesses, rebilling
     long-distance, say, or local services. Customer service and price
     were the differentiators. Now, this market segment has branched
     out to take on new services, both to mitigate the risk of being a
     one-trick pony, but also to compete for customers who
     increasingly want ...

Nortel Continues 3G Push
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19453?11228

     Nortel is moving full-speed ahead with its involvement in the
     push for 3G services in the wireless sector. Its most recent
     contract win is out of Paris with Bouygues Telecom.  Bouygues has
     relied on Nortel through the years, starting with its GSM rollout
     and through its move to EDGE. The operator is now turning to
     Nortel to power ...

Communications Cops Investigate VoIP E911 Concerns
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19450?11228

     Using the somewhat sexy moniker 'Project 41', the
     Association of Public-Safety Communications officials (APCO)
     International has launched a project to solve the public-safety
     problems created by Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology.
     The charter of Project 41, APCO says, is to 'address the
     impact upon ...

RIM's 'Stealth' to Uncloak?
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19447?11228

     Research In Motion Ltd. (RIM) could be gearing up to unveil its
     hotly anticipated 'prosumer' smartphone early in September,
     according to analysts.  The Canadian company sent out a note this
     morning inviting journalists to an 'exclusive BlackBerry press
     event' in London on September 6 with a number of...

Achtung! Regulators Force DT to Share
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19444?11228

     Deutsche Telekom AG will be forced to play nice and share its
     broadband network with competitors, after the European Commission
     upheld a ruling by German regulator BNetzA that the incumbent
     holds too dominant a position in the market. The Commission
     approved BNetzA's decision to require Deutsche Telekom to offer
     local ...

IPTV Will Drive Future of DSL IC Chipset Market
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19441?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- While data and VoIP continue to drive the
     DSL IC chipset market, and will account for the bulk of port
     shipments through 2010, the delivery of IPTV capability is the wave
     of the future, reports In-Stat. Carriers worldwide are using ADSL2+
     and VDSL2 as they upgrade their networks to deliver television and
     video ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:59:49 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Cisco Buys Arroyo


USTelecom dailyLead
August 22, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emakfDtusXaRavNXUn


TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Cisco buys Arroyo
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Lauer to leave Sprint Nextel
* Verizon, BellSouth to add new surcharge to DSL bills
* PCCW's wireless broadband service struggles in U.K.
* Pipex to launch first U.K. WiMAX service in Milton Keynes
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Learn more about Next Generation Wireless Applications
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Analysts: WiMAX making gains, but mass market deployment a ways off
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FTC Chief:  No need for Net neutrality laws
* T-Mobile leads bidding in spectrum auction
DIVERSIONS
* Web Surfing in Public Places Is a Way to Court Trouble
* In and Around Times Square
* Renting Movies With a Box and a Beam
* Take My Nest Egg. Please.
* Now the Music Industry Wants Guitarists to Stop Sharing
* Broadway's Touring Shows Find Seats Harder to Sell

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emakfDtusXaRavNXUn

------------------------------

From: rbc310@gmail.com
Subject: Cellular Roaming Tariffs
Date: 22 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Can anyone direct me to a PUC tariff on inter-carrier cellular roaming
charges?

I'm looking for a tariff detailing the charges that Carrier A would
charge to Carrier B if Carrier A originates a call from a roaming
customer of Carrier B.

Essentially, the CABS of wireless.

Thank you.

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:29:25 -0700
Organization: Networks & Distributed Computing


On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> The only way you can use handsets that were for Net10 or TracFone
> outside of their systems is if you have them reflashed with generic
> non-Net10 or TracFone specific firmware.

Why would that be a problem?  Is there some reason that makes these
phones particularly difficult to reflash?  Reflashing is trivial on
most other phones.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men ... on Terrorist Charges
Date: 22 Aug 2006 10:16:00 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note:

> Now regards the other part of your letter, children or other
> 'first-time users' of telco; how do they get service, etc?  Well Lisa,
> I remember quite well, as you must, in the 1950-60's when you called
> the business office to get a phone installed, the 'telephone man' came
> out the same day or the next morning at latest, put it in and turned
> it on. There were no questions asked; there were no credit limits set;
> that was your business.

In Philadelphia (and I think NYC) new customers had to put in a
deposit for several months.

When I got my own phone line in my parents' house, they gave me a
choice of being on my parents' bill immediately or giving them a
deposit for an account in my name.  I wanted to my account and some
privacy so I paid a deposit.  I got it back after four months.  It may
have had interest.  (As an aside, their check was still in the old Bell
System logo and was pretty fancy.  I wish I made a photocopy of it.)

As an aside, they used the yellow-black wires for my line.  These were
once used for Trimline lights by the former owner but we didn't have
any Trimlines.  I got basic black hard wired.   Modular came out a few
years later.

I don't blame them for this policy since utilities get badly burned by
deadbeats.  The "progressives" feel sorry for the poor and force
difficult procedures before service is cut off for any utility.  The
reality is that many people take full advtg of this and cheat the
companies.

The Philadelphia Gas Works, being city owned and subject to extensive
pressure, had an extremely liberal disconnect policy and as a result a
huge deadbeat load.  Finally pressure from other quarters--the people
who actually paid the bills--forced a change.

 From time to time there's a fatal house fire from candles or stoves
where the electric is cut off for non payment, and the "cruel" electric
company is blamed, not the people who failed to pay the bill.

For whatever reasons, these pressures seem to be more of a city
problem.  In the suburbs, the attitude is different.

> Now the other day, I decided to call AT&T to inquire about some sort
> of promotional deal I got in the mail; they refused to discuss it at
> all until they had my street address and social security number which
> I refused to give them. I guess things are changing a lot.   PAT]

Part of this is to protect the company, part of it is to protect us
from identity theft.  What irks me is that corporate American's never
ending battle to sell us more stuff is responsible for identity theft,
such as giving instant credit in stores and issuing credit cards like
crazy.  Further, most businesses are national chains with processing
centralized, so there is no local controls or knowing the person.

I checked the requirements for a 16 y/o to get their first driver's
license.  They are required to bring in a variety of documents, but one
of which must be a photo ID.  A school transcript is not enough, this
is in addition to that.  I guess all schools issue photo IDs now, my
public high school sure as heck didn't have the money for that.  Our
computer generated class schedule card served as our ID card.  'Course
we didn't have metal detectors or cameras in public schools then
either.  Do all schools give kids photo ID these days?

Cops sometimes stop pedestrians for suspicious activities, such as
taking pictures.  I wonder what would happen if someone didn't have a
driver's license or state ID, but had other ID, like an employer's
card, library card, etc.  I wish I had the resources to test the
system, but I don't and lawyers are expensive.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:07:58 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Actually, the 'Great Depression' is
>> normally dated as the last three months of 1929, along with 1930-33.
>> I do not think Bell did any central office conversions during that
>> time period, or very few of them. Chicago did not start converting
>> until 1939, after the depression, when our country was well on the
>> way toward recovery (which generally means a war is going on). Many
>> of the conversions occurred in the late 1940's and throughout the
>> 1950's, and as we know, those were much better times financially for
>> almost everyone.    PAT]

> Generally, the Depression is started by be the fall of 1929 until about
> 1939-40.  Although the big stock market crash is generally accepted to
> the be the start, for some people hard times started much earlier and
> later for others.  Hard times continued until to about 1940 when
> defense spending perked up.  There was some natural economic growth in
> 1939.  There was a slight recovery in 1936-7, but then FDR cut the
> budget back and the economy fell down again.

[snip]

> Someone else mentioned 25% unemployment even in 1941.  That is too
> high.  20-%25% was about the worst the country had (except in some
> especially hard hit areas like the Dust Bowl), but other places
> weren't quite as hard hit.  By 1939 it was down to about 15%.  That's
> still very high but not quite as bad.  It varied quite a bit by region
> and industry.  There were some nasty strikes in the late 1930s that
> pushed up wages which allowed workers to have more money than mere
> sustenance.

It was me. I know I have heard those numbers so I started digging. I 
guess a lot of these records have never been posted on the internet. :)

Did they define unemployment then as they do now? For a long time now
you only count if you are looking for work. Surveys are now done by
phone. In the 30s I wonder what methods were used. And to be honest
I'll bet the rates in NYC and Chicago were different in many ways than
where I grew up outside of the small city (remote from almost
anywhere) of Paducah. Lots of folks were working in the 30s but not
making much money. My dad's high school class was very small due to
most of the kids dropping out way before they turned 16 to go to work
to help the family out.

But here's what I've found so far. A table I found that was supposed
to be based on government labor stats had 10,390,000 unemployed in
1938, 9,480,000 in 1939, 8,120,000 in 1940, and 5,560,000 in
1941. This translates into unemployment rates of 19.9%, 17.1%, 14.5%,
and 9.%.

But these numbers are skewed for due to WWI, the US started ramping up
aircraft production about this time. As best I can tell B17 production
alone in 38 and 39 accounted for 2000 assembly jobs plus all the
indirect supplier jobs, grocery store, clothing stores, etc ... And
there were a lot of other plans being produced in larger numbers. On
12/7/41 we had 4 fully equipped carriers in the Pacific plus more
under construction. And a deployed carrier, even in 1941, represented a
huge number of jobs. Both in crew, support, and just building it and
the planes. Plus we were shipping planes to England and France in 1938,
1939, and 1940. (We lost over 100 carrier planes when France fell and they
were interred for the duration of the war.)

Then add in that nearly 1,000,000 men were drafted (army only?) in 1941.

So the question I have is how of the recovery was without war and
pre-war spending? Any? I know life was tough for my dad's farm family.
He was born in 1925 and says the ONLY reason the had food was that they
had a slaughter house operation saw mill and were big enough to be
able to supply schools and such and not be dependent on the local
farmers markets. And he talks about a life that was closer to little
house on the prairie than 1960.

Here's the stats I have. Plus now I'm interested enough to try and find 
out what the increased pre-war spending did for the economy. So I get to 
dig deeper.

Year	    Pop	      Labor Force	LF %	Unemployed	Rate
1929	88,010,000	49,440,000	56.18%	1,550,000	3.14
1930	89,550,000	50,080,000	55.92%	4,340,000	8.67
1931	90,710,000	50,680,000	55.87%	8,020,000	15.82
1932	91,810,000	51,250,000	55.82%	12,060,000	23.53
1933	92,950,000	51,840,000	55.77%	12,830,000	24.75
1934	94,190,000	52,490,000	55.73%	11,340,000	21.60
1935	95,460,000	53,140,000	55.67%	10,610,000	19.97
1936	96,700,000	53,740,000	55.57%	9,030,000	16.80
1937	97,870,000	54,320,000	55.50%	7,700,000	14.18
1938	99,120,000	54,950,000	55.44%	10,390,000	18.91
1939	100,360,000	55,600,000	55.40%	9,480,000	17.05
1940	101,560,000	56,180,000	55.32%	8,120,000	14.45
1941	102,700,000	57,530,000	56.02%	5,560,000	9.66

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Regards food to eat during the depression
years, my father was born in 1922 and my mother was born in 1924, and 
they both migrated to Coffeyville, KS in their childhood years. My
mother pointed out that in the 1930-40 time period, she could come
home from the grocery store with two or three _large_ bags of groceries
for five dollars. Of course, many guys did not have the five dollars. 
One reason there were few -- if any -- 'help wanted' ads in newspapers
was because almost instantly upon a job becoming available, 'word' got
around and someone would walk in off the street and ask for it.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: What's This Telephone Related Item?
Date: 22 Aug 2006 10:22:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to Jim Stewart:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: A long time ago, pay telephones did not
> accept money as such; they were operated with 'telephone slugs'; at
> least the ones in Chicago were.

I'm not sure that's a pay phone token.

I thought tokens were discontinued way way back when Gray's 3-slot
phones came out that could take any demonination deposit via 5c, 10c,
and 25c coins.

Anyway, on this item the phone appears to be a Trimline, not a
Princess, and it appears the date is 198?.  There is no Bell System
marking at all.

Usually tokens had some marking to indicate their value, ie "good for
one city fare" or "good for one phone call".  Some systems issued
multiple tokens, such as one for local buses and one for expresses or
special services.  The LIRR used to issue this huge medallion sized
token for Belmont Racetrack trains.  Phila has adult tokens and school
fare tokens.  Tokens are being phased out for mag cards.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Walgreens used pay phone slugs until
sometime in the 1920's, and the Woolworth and Kresge Five and Ten Cent
Stores (today, we know Kresge 5-10 as 'K-Mart') through about the same
time, however the one of the two Woolworth stores in downtown Chicago
had Gray Pay Station Company phones and phone booths until sometime in
the 1960's (although long since taken over by Illinois Bell, via the
Chicago Telephone Company), and they were the two-piece instruments
with a piece you held up to your ear (brown cloth, not metal and not
armored cord) in one hand while you leaned forward to speak into the
microphone mouthpiece. I think maybe those were removed by 1960; I
cannot honestly remember them after that time, but I remember quite
well as an adolescent child going 'downtown' and being fascinated by
using those things (1952-54?), but at that time we paid by inserting
one dime or two nickles (one nickle alone no longer worked, as the
sign on the wall of the phone booth reminded us).

Do you remember when nearby the phone booths there would always be a
table with phone directories mounted on it, and a seat with a small
reading lamp where you could sit to locate the number you were trying
to call? And of course the phone booths themselves were made out of
rather elegant wood with a nice brown-stained finish; they all had 
the little domed ceiling lights, the 'accordion doors with glass in
the front which would slide open or closed (turning on the overhead
light and the little ceiling fan inside, and the sign on the front of
each one announcing 'Public Telephone'. 

When my uncle had his Walgreen Agency Drug Store in Whiting in the
middle 1950's the store payphone near the front door was similar to
those, but the booth had a Genuine Bell style phone in it rather than
a Gray Pay Station instrument.  PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #310
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Aug 23 16:21:59 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 4360621CF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #311
Message-Id: <20060823202159.4360621CF@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:23:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 311

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    AT&T Sues Data Brokers For Stolen Customer Records (Reuters News Wire)
    NSDI '07 Call For Papers (Lionel Garth Jones)
    The SIM Card Turns Fifteen (Mr Joseph Singer)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 23, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    BT Places Bet on Broadband Video (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: What's This Telephone Related Item? (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: What's This Telephone Related Item? (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Joseph Singer)
    Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Verizon Re: Clueless Hollywood (jared)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:30:18 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: AT&T Sues Data Brokers For Stolen Customer Records


AT&T Inc. on Wednesday sued 25 unnamed data brokers, accusing them of
fraudulently gaining access to about 2,500 customers' calling records.

The lawsuit, filed in a U.S. District Court division in San Antonio,
said the "John Doe" defendants often collected information for use in
legal or domestic disputes.

AT&T said they used a method known as "pretexting," or setting up
online accounts by using identification data such as Social Security
numbers.  Through the online accounts, the brokers obtained access to
customer information, including calling records.

No driver's license numbers or sensitive financial data were
accessible, the company said.

AT&T said the lawsuit was a step toward identifying the perpetrators
by using e-mail addresses and Internet Protocol addresses and to seek
damages.

The company said it had already contacted customers who may have been
affected and had taken steps to prevent such violations.

"This affects only a tiny fraction of our customers," AT&T Chief
Privacy Officer Priscilla Hill-Ardoin said in a statement. "But we
will pursue this on behalf of our customers to the end."

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: This is really a good example of Brass
Bedsprings, isn't it? AT&T self-righteously plans to sue for the 
invasion of 'privacy'; yet the company is being sued by members of
the public for the very same thing regards turning over its records
to Homeland Security, which _they_ feel is just fine.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:49:32 -0700
From: Lionel Garth Jones <lgj@usenix.org>
Subject: NSDI '07 Call For Papers


Call For Papers:
4th Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '07)
April 11-13, 2007
Cambridge, MA, USA
http://www.usenix.org/nsdi07/cfpa
Sponsored by USENIX, in cooperation with ACM SIGCOMM and ACM SIGOPS
Submissions Deadline: October 2, 2006

The final Call for Papers for the 4th Symposium on Networked Systems
Design & Implementation (NSDI '07) is now available. The program
committee seeks a broad variety of work that furthers the knowledge
and understanding of the networked systems community as a whole,
continues a significant research dialog, or pushes the architectural
boundaries of large-scale network services. We solicit papers
describing original and previously unpublished research.

Paper titles and abstracts due October 2, 2006, 11:59 p.m. GMT.

NSDI '07 will take place April 11-13, 2007, in Cambridge, MA.

For topics of interest and submission guidelines, see
http://www.usenix.org/nsdi07/cfpa/

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:10:38 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: The SIM Card Turns Fifteen


No other smart card has taken the world by storm the way the
Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) has. Since it was introduced on the
market 15 years ago, the SIM card has seen its power and performance
soar. At first, it "merely" served security and personalization
functions in GSM networks. Today, it turns mobile phones into
versatile, secure terminals for wireless customers.

Munich technology group Giesecke & Devrient (G&D) is celebrating a
special anniversary. It was 15 years ago that the first commercial SIM
cards were delivered to Finnish mobile communications corporation
Elisa, at that time still known as Radiolinja.  In its initial stages
of development, the SIM card was intended to make mobile telephony in
GSM networks as secure as talking on the phone of a fixed-line
network. To accomplish that, it was designed to clearly establish the
identity of wireless customers in order to prevent mobile networks
from being abused. Additionally, it was meant to safeguard the
confidentiality of user data. Its second key feature was its
flexibility. Whenever customers changed phones, the SIM card could
simply be transferred to the new handset.

http://www.cellular-news.com/story/18932.php

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 23, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:14:20 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 23, 2006
********************************

Iliad Launches Flat-Rate Broadband, Telephone Service in France
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19486?11228

     French consumer broadband provider Iliad has launched a flat-rate
     product, offering customers a bundle of telephone and broadband
     internet services for a flat fee of 29.99 euro (US$38.45) per
     month.  Under the service, which will add to growing competition
     in the French broadband market, customers-whether using
     Iliad's unbundled local ...

Man Overboard!: Five Early Warning Signs that a Telecom Customer May
Be About to Jump Ship
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19482?11228

     HOW DOES A TELECOM KNOW if a customer is about to leave for the
     competition? Measure-X, a Phoenix-based company that specializes
     in helping telephone companies improve their customer service and
     sales, has identified five early warning signs that indicate a
     customer is about to jump ship.  Squeaky Wheel. The most obvious
     sign of an ...

Vizrea Focuses on Camera Phone Users
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19478?11228

     Camera phone photos tend to be fleeting -- snapped today,
     forgotten tomorrow. But as image quality improves and usage
     increases, camera phone users are becoming more concerned about
     saving, sharing and organizing their pictures.  Seattle-based
     startup Vizrea sees an emerging opportunity in the legions of
     camera phone fans fretting about ...

Lenovo Embeds Cingular into ThinkPad
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19473?11228

     Cingular Wireless is making further inroads in its effort to
     promote the use of high-speed wireless services on notebook
     computers. The latest: the carrier announced Lenovo has embedded
     its UMTS/HSDPA-based technology into its ThinkPad T60 notebook.
     The notebook marks the first time Lenovo has built Cingular's
     high-speed ...

NENA Urges FCC To Heed Cyren Call's Spectrum Plan
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19471?11228

     The National Emergency Number Association (NENA) this
     week&nbsp;urged U.S. federal policymakers to start immediate
     proceedings and to seriously consider a proposal made earlier
     this year for a national shared commercial/public-safety
     communications network using 30 megahertz of spectrum currently
     scheduled to be auctioned by the Federal...

Could CDMA Hurt Alcatel Lucent?
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19468?11228

     Another analyst has come out swinging against the merger of
     Alcatel and Lucent Technologies Inc., this time criticizing the
     companies' combined product lineup and the potential decline of
     Lucent's CDMA franchise.  Analyst Joe Chiasson of Susquehanna
     Financial Group voiced his concerns in a note issued this
     morning.  ...

AT&T: Hold the MoCA
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19466?11228

     AT&T today made it official that HomePNA version 3 will be its
     choice technology for in-home networking to support its fiber-fed
     U-verse data and television services, and its copper-fed AT&T
     Yahoo DSL high-speed Internet service.  This is noteworthy
     because AT&T was using MoCA, the technology developed to allow ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:39:11 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: BT Places Bet on Broadband Video


USTelecom dailyLead
August 23, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emksfDtusXaXusbjSu

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* BT places bet on broadband video
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Analysis: Sprint Nextel faces uphill climb
* Sony buys video-sharing site Grouper for $65 million
* Lenovo, Cingular announce laptop for Cingular's BroadbandConnect service
* Verizon Business implements IP-based system for call center services
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Gbps+ Wireless Local Loop: Transforming Last Mile Economics
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* European carriers to rely on xDSL for triple play
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Supreme Court justice lets EchoStar ruling stand
* Pennsylvania House Committee holds video franchising hearing
* AT&T lands Hawaii contract worth $250M
DIVERSIONS
* Fired or Quit, Tom Cruise Parts Ways With Studio
* Denver
* Logging On for Love, Tuning Out the Realities
* College-Town Real Estate: The Next Big Niche?
* Joining the Tycoons at a Black Sea Playground in Crimea
* Pigskin to Thin Skin to Skin Alive

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emksfDtusXaXusbjSu

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: What's This Telephone Related Item?
Date: 22 Aug 2006 13:35:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to writer:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The one of the two Woolworth stores
> in downtown Chicago had Gray Pay Station Company phones and phone
> booths until sometime in the 1960's (although long since taken over
> by Illinois Bell, via the Chicago Telephone Company), and they were
> the two-piece instruments with a piece you held up to your ear
> (brown cloth, not metal and not armored cord) in one hand while you
> leaned forward to speak into the microphone mouthpiece. I think
> maybe those were removed by 1960;

Many two-piece phones remained in service in the 1950s, especially in
coin service.  Old B&W TV shows made in the 1950s showed them in
regular use.  I'm told, however, that the transmitter and receiver
elements were actually modern "F" units, not the original types.  The
sound quality was noticeably better on F units.  Someone says the
voltage changed as well from early systems.  Note too that the 202
type "French Telephone" were replaced with F handsets instead of the E
model for the same reason.

Pay phones with the mounted transmitter were simpler since sound
induction to that transmitter carried the coin drop bell sounds.  The
later models required a separate tiny microphone near the bells to
transmit the signal.

"F" units were from the 302 series telephone sets.  "G" units were
from the 500 sets.  I don't know about H, I, or J, but K units were
used in modern sets where the handset ends are somewhat squared off
instead of circular, including late Western Electric units.  K and G
are not compatible.

> Do you remember when nearby the phone booths there would always be a
> table with phone directories mounted on it, and a seat with a small
> reading lamp where you could sit to locate the number you were trying
> to call? And of course the phone booths themselves were made out of
> rather elegant wood with a nice brown-stained finish; they all had
> the little domed ceiling lights, the 'accordion doors with glass in
> the front which would slide open or closed (turning on the overhead
> light and the little ceiling fan inside, and the sign on the front of
> each one announcing 'Public Telephone'.

And you could turn the vent fan on or off to suit your needs.  They
almost always had a phone book nearby; large banks had a block of
directories.  Sadly, most of those old booths are gone, replaced by
nothing or wall mounted phones.

A very busy place, like a main train station, had a telephone service
center with an attendant and switchboard to assist you in person.

Some newer 1960ish buildings had modern sit down booths made of
circular glass or other designs, newer 1970ish buildings just had wall
mounted phones in an enclosure.  It varied; even in the old days some
phones were simply mounted without any enclosure.

Some years ago I visited a former employer and the lobby of the
building once held a bank of such phone booths--the chair, table, fan,
door, etc.  I needed to use a pay phone but the bank was completely
gone.  The lobby had no pay phone at all!  I was directed to another
building across the street where I found a wall mounted phone (no
enclosure at all) in a narrow back hall.  There was another phone and
some loud talker was on it.  His voice echoed badly throughout the
narrow hall and I couldn't hear a thing on my call.

What angered me was that phone booths were supplied for a reason!  It
was to give the caller some privacy and ability to hear (esp in the
days when telephones weren't so good.

Sadly, even in the 1960s vandalism and sleaze took its toll and new
installations tended to be free standing or acoustical surrounding
only, not a full booth.  Some places had a row of pay phones without
any separation whatsoever which was absurb for acoustics.

Some train stations have phones subsidized by the carrier so as to
provide a 911 emergency service.  This is probably cheaper than
providing merely an emergency call box, at least the pay phone might
generate some revenue to cover its cost even nowadays.

> When my uncle had his Walgreen Agency Drug Store in Whiting in the
> middle 1950's the store payphone near the front door was similar to
> those, but the booth had a Genuine Bell style phone in it rather than
> a Gray Pay Station instrument.

The Bell 3-slot phone was based on the Gray design and Gray built a
great many for Bell under Bell specs.

At the rate things are going pay phones will be gone eventually.  One
factor is everyone having a cell phone.  Another factor is that local
calls are cheap people will let you use their business lines; years
ago that'd be too costly.  Years ago employees were forbidden from
using employer lines for personal calls, an edict strictly enforced.
In those days large workplaces often had payphones on every floor as
well as banks in the lobby.  Today the lobbies of fancy businesses
have house phones offering free local calls.

Of course the telcos by charging exhorbitant rates for pay phone toll
calls pushed away a lot of this business.  A payphone won't take a
real long distance coin call but charge a huge amount $25.00 on a
credit card.  An regional toll call, which they still carry, runs a
dollar or more for a 10 mile call for 1 minute.  (Some Bell payphones
in Pennsylvania Station NYC offer within-state per minute calls).

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:11:34 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: What's This Telephone Related Item?


Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:00:08 -0700 Jim Stewart <jstewart@jkmicro.com>
wrote:

> http://www.grumpyoldgeek.com/PhoneSlug/PhoneSlug.htm

> I was cleaning out a desk drawer last night and ran across this
> item.  It's about .007" wider and thicker than a US quarter.  I
> can't remember where I got it, but the Princess phone on the back
> leads me to believe it's payphone related.

It's not payphone related at least not for the US.  I've seen and used
such a token when I was at a gym with a pay metered tanning booth.
The token looked exactly as the one you have illustrated.

That said many countries did use tokens in their public pay
telephones.  In Israel for years they used tokens.  Part of the
reason for keeping on using tokens is if your currency is unstable
all you have to do is to raise the price of tokens (typically
obtained at the "post office" or at kiosks.)  During times of
inflation it's almost impossible to find tokens since people hord
them knowing that because inflation is so rapid it's a "hedge"
against inflation since tokens will increase in price as inflation
happens.  With that system in place it's not even necessary for the
telephone company to increase debiting for calls since the cost of
tokens has increased.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:19:38 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges


Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:29:25 -0700
wrote:

> The only way you can use handsets that were for Net10 or TracFone
> outside of their systems is if you have them reflashed with generic
> non-Net10 or TracFone specific firmware.

> Why would that be a problem?  Is there some reason that makes these
> phones particularly difficult to reflash?  Reflashing is trivial on
> most other phones.

You said it yourself.  Reflashing is trivial on most *other* phones.
 From what I understand reflashing Motorola is fairly easy.  It's not
so for Nokia unless you have invested in the specialized equipment,
dongles, clips etc. to do it.  Considering the value of the typical
phones used for TracFone or Net10 it's a lot of work for little
profit.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs
Date: 22 Aug 2006 13:40:59 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


rbc310@gmail.com wrote:

> Can anyone direct me to a PUC tariff on inter-carrier cellular roaming
> charges?

Is there even such a thing as PUC "tariffs" anymore on wireless
services?  I thought they were completely deregulated and charges were
based on your personal contract with the carrier.

I know my own contract with my carrier (which is old) offers different
roaming areas and charges than newer contracts do of the same carrier.
The PUC has nothing to do with it.

Is there something specific you are looking for?

Also, I thought the concept of A/B switching on cell phones is
obsolete.  Do modern cell phones even have that capability?  A/B dates
back to the early days when there were only two carriers.  There are
many today.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Date: 22 Aug 2006 14:06:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


DLR wrote:

> Did they define unemployment then as they do now? For a long time now
> you only count if you are looking for work. Surveys are now done by
> phone. In the 30s I wonder what methods were used.

In 1932 a phone survey predicted Hoover would win against FDR.  But in
1932 the people who had phones were affluent and supported Hoover.

I don't know how they sampled unemployment or the definitions used
back then.

> I'll bet the rates in NYC and Chicago were different in many ways than
> where I grew up outside of the small city (remote from almost
> anywhere) of Paducah.

Absolutely.  Many people left the small towns and rural areas for the
big cities in those years to find jobs and escape the boredum of rural
life.

> Lots of folks were working in the 30s but not making much money.

That is not reflected in unemployment stats.  But it was a big part of
the economic troubles and the deflation of those years.  Money was
extremely tight.  People wouldn't spend it unless they absolutely had
to which constrained the economy.  People who did have jobs made very
little money; most companies had pay cuts.

The deflation meant that if you owed money (like for a mortgage on the
farm or house), it was harder to pay it since you had to work so much
harder to get a dollar than in the past -- the dollar was worth more.
We're used to inflation where the dollar declines and that benefits
borrowers.

> My dad's high school class was very small due to
> most of the kids dropping out way before they turned 16 to go to work
> to help the family out.

Very common in those days.

> So the question I have is how of the recovery was without war and
> pre-war spending? Any? I know life was tough for my dad's farm family.

Farm life was very tough before the Depression and the Depression made
it worse.

The government started its "alphabet soup" of programs -- NRA, WPA,
PWA, TVA, AAA, CCC, to (1) help individuals keep their homes and not
starve, (2) pump money into the economy, and (3) give some hope to
people.  Note that the RFC, which loaned money to railroads, banks and
businesses so they'd stay open and keep people working, was instituted
by Herbert Hoover, not FDR, and Hoover set a record of increased govt
spending.  Hoover was a terrible "spin doctor" compared to FDR,
though.

The government programs helped a little, but conditions remained hard
throughout the 1930s.  Obviously it varied from person to person and
location to location.  A few people had comfortable middle class
lifestyles (they were still building and selling cars and a few nice
new houses), most did not.

Most people managed to get along "ok" -- they were working -- though
it was hard.  Occassionally they'd have a little extra money for a
luxury like a movie, eating out, or outing or vacation.

A big problem was lack of confidence.  If someone did have an extra
nickel, they'd really hesitate to spend it, afraid of tomorrow.

Things slowly improved beginning in 1938, mostly from defense and
foreign military spending.

I think the two World's Fairs in 1939 (NYC and SF) perked things up a
bit.  Times were still quite tough, but slowly easing.  As more people
got jobs, they spent money which turned the downward cycle around.  In
Philadelphia a lot of nice new houses were built around 1938 onward
and new apartment towers in NYC.  Some places or industires never
recovered.

Like everyone else, the Bell System was picking up business at that
time.  It was about to finish some new products, like the 555 PBX, but
then the war hit and froze all work.  The 555 didn't make it out until
1949.  However, I think toll long distance benefited from wartime
radar experience which used microwaves.  A lot of young men learned
advanced electronics from their war time jobs and they were eagerly
sought by industry after the war where they made major contributions
in computers and communications.  The Bell System, IBM, RCA and other
such companies exploded after the war.  (Postwar defense spending
helped quite a bit.)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:27:45 -0600
From: jared@netspacenospamnet.au (jared)
Subject: Re: Verizon Re: Clueless Hollywood


> It could very well have been a Verizon pay phone.  They have phones in a 
> lot of areas that are not served by them.  In California, you can look 
> outside Albersons Supermarkets, Savon, 7/11 and a lot more.

In the Denver area, which is Qwest territory with the major phone
directory being their spinoff Dex, Verizon is the brand name on one of
the secondary phone directories.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #311
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Aug 24 14:43:30 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 7B84D21EA; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #312
Message-Id: <20060824184330.7B84D21EA@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:45:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 312

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    NOLA Phone Book: About Half the Size it Used to Be (Associated Press)
    Train Station Pay Phones Mostly Removed (Lisa Hancock)
    VoIP on Cell Phones: Read the Fine Print (John Blau, IDG)
    ID Security Company Finds Snags in Fraud Alert System (Tom Zeller NY Times)
    Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please (Michael Smith, Reuters)
    AT&T Inks U-Verse Deal (USTelecom Daily Lead)
    Taxes: Two Out of Three Rule? (Bryan Griffin)
    Some Things Never Change: 350 Lines Tapped in New York City (Lisa Hancock)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 24, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs (Michael D. Sullivan)
    Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist (Mark Crispin)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (mc)
    Re: What's This Telephone Related Item? (Wesrock@aol.com)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:48:25 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: NOLA Phone Book: About Half the Size it Used to Be


Smaller New Orleans phonebook reflects new city

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AP) -- On a recent hot day, the new phonebook
landed with a thud on the stoop of a house that one year ago lay under
water, a notable sign of normalcy.

The phonebook's arrival is a mark of progress here, but it's also a
window into how much has changed. With nearly half the city's
population gone, two swollen books have shrunk to one, following a
decision by the phonebook's editors to fold the white pages into the
rest of the book.  Meanwhile, the yellow pages now include far larger
ads for contractors, electricians, roofers and others crucial to the
city's rebuilding.

Lay the old and new editions side by side, and the resulting contrast
is a microcosm of a transformed metropolis.

It's one in which people need help repairing their homes, but don't
have time to fuss with their hair -- the 'Contractors - General'
section jumped from six to 14 pages and 'Roof Contractors' from 15 to
32, while listings under 'Beauty Salons' declined 42 percent from 541
individual businesses to 316.

"Every single thing that people need to rebuild their lives is
literally in that book," said BellSouth Corp. district sales manager
Gayla Meilleur, who worked on the New Orleans phonebook.

Which is exactly the point: In a city in tatters, where a majority of
homes still don't have electricity, the focus is on making whole what
was destroyed. It's businesses that help people do that which are
seeing a spike in sales and are now represented with larger, splashier
ads.  People need to buy mattresses and couches to replace their soggy
ones, but they can't afford to do so with antiques: The 'Furniture'
heading leaped from three to over four full pages, while 'Antique
Dealers' is thinner, having shed 26 out of 145 businesses.

Businesses that offer luxury goods, or else services that are not
essential, are struggling and so scaling back their presence in the
new book. So are those catering to tourists; the 'Gift Shop' category
dropped to 139 listings from a pre-Katrina high of 167.

"Everything is housing right now. Nothing else matters," said window
installer Sam Criscione, owner of Classic Vue Exteriors Inc., who's
installing three times as many windows as he did before the storm. His
lean, rectangular ad didn't change size, but instead he added a splash
of aquamarine blue to the lettering -- a way to call attention to his
44 years in business and to differentiate himself from out-of-town
"storm chasers," he said.

Windows are one of the first items to get replaced -- as are roofs.
Within a month of the storm, one of New Orleans' oldest roofing
businesses was fielding 10,000 calls a month, up from around 1,000 at
the same time the year before.

"It was overwhelming," said Robin Trupiano, manager of Robertson
Roofing & Siding Inc.

The call volumes tracked by BellSouth offer a portrait of frantic
rebuilding: Businesses under the 'Roofing Contractor' heading saw, on
average, an 833 percent increase in calls. Those under the
"Contractors-General" were up 333 percent. "Gutters & Downspouts"
leaped 483 percent.

Analysts had predicted the construction industry would thrive in the
wake of the destructive storm. But they had also forecast that nearly
all other sections of the economy would shrivel.

The spike in calls to other headings in the phonebook reveals they
were largely wrong: Calls to businesses under the 'Attorneys' tab
jumped 183 percent. 'Chiropractic Physicians' spiked 108 percent, a
result of people throwing out their backs as they struggled to repair
their homes.  And in spite of the burden of rebuilding, families still
needed to see the dentist -- calls leaped over 107 percent.

Thousands of businesses provided goods and services that are not
rebuilding-oriented, yet are still essential to the day-to-day life of
the city. Because many of them flooded, those that managed to reopen
are now reaping the bounty their competitors left behind.

"We have a tremendous amount of new patients because a lot of dentists
east of us were flooded," explained Veronica Brown, manager of Elmwood
Dental Center. It went from a half-page ad in last year's phonebook to
a full-page one this year. The practice is seeing a third more new
patients than before Katrina and has hired more employees.

Changing business models

Those that don't provide essential services changed their business
model to cater to the new economy, like high-end landscapers, who
pulled out the chain saws and joined the ranks of tree cutters. Calls
to businesses under 'Tree Service' ballooned 488 percent.

"Who's interested in putting in flowers after the storm? That's more
of a luxury," said Ted Anthony, owner of Anthony's Landscaping.

The part of the economy that's limping are shops like the one in the
French Quarter that sells "chapeaux" dressed in vintage brocades and
South African feathers.

"Some of our ladies will come in, try on the hat and make plans to buy
it after the house is finished. We're struggling to stay open," said
Katherine Madere, the head saleswoman at Fleur de Paris, a New Orleans
institution. Sales have plunged 50 percent. To stay afloat, the
boutique has slashed costs by letting go all but one of its 14
employees.

Unlike cashing a check or getting a pair of new glasses, a hat is a
frill. So are attempts to pamper oneself -- 'Massage Therapists' has
21 percent fewer businesses listed than last year. And between tearing
out wallboard and battling insurance adjusters, many have fallen off
the diet bandwagon --'Weight Loss' has 39 percent fewer listings in
this edition than in last year's.

Yet one can deduce from the new phonebook that large swaths of the
economy are doing better than expected. It has 44,579 individual
businesses listed -- just 1,046, or 2 percent, less than last
year. It's not cheap to advertise in the phonebook -- a quarter-page,
full color ad costs over $960 a month, according to BellSouth -- so it
stands to reason that businesses making that kind of investment are in
operation.

New Orleans: Half its former size

At the same time, the fact that the white and yellow pages have been
consolidated into a single phonebook is a testament to how much this
once vibrant city has shrunk: To date, only 235,000 people, or around
45 percent of the city's original population of 485,000, has returned,
according to state estimates. It's an estimate which jibes with the
rate of utility hookups -- so far only around 47 percent of customers
in New Orleans have resumed their electric service.

One of the paradoxes of post-Katrina New Orleans is that if just under
half its population has returned, how can it support nearly the same
number of businesses?

The answer can be found in the calls BellSouth tracked for T.J. Lee,
the owner of a fancy reception hall in Metairie, a suburb of New
Orleans.  Lee expected his business to wither, but he was barraged
with calls -- from brides-to-be wanting to reschedule their weddings,
for anniversaries, from groups planning reunions.

When he received his call volume report from BellSouth, Lee noticed
the calls were no longer preceded by 504 -- the New Orleans-area
prefix -- but instead by 713, 404, 214 and others.

"What that was telling me is people were taking their books to
Houston, to Atlanta, to Dallas," said Lee, who came into BellSouth's
New Orleans office to discuss ramping up his presence on
http://YellowPages.Com to reach those that left their phonebooks behind.

The call volume from out-of-towners was so high, Robin Trupiano called
her telephone company to upgrade the Robertson Roofing's calling plan
to unlimited long distance. "We just never needed it before," she
said.

It's, after all, a sign of hope -- yellow pages are now in the hands of 
a diaspora spread like seeds across the country. The fact they're still 
calling means, maybe, they're coming home.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.
 
Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/23/katrina.phonebook.ap/index.html  

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Train Station Pay Phones Mostly Removed
Date: 23 Aug 2006 13:15:54 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


NJ Transit will move 22 pay phones from its Trenton RR station.  Three
phones will remain in a different location.  The old phones were
located as a battery along the wall of the concourse.  They were flush
mounted panel style, with no separations between them.  The remaining
phones are in a different spot.  Removal is part of station
reconstruction.

I'd like to get a picture of the phone bank since that kind of thing
will not be scene again, but the cops in the station are very fussy
about picture taking.

See:

http://www.njtransit.com/sa/sa_servlet.srv?hdnPageAction=ConstructionAdvisoryTo&AdvisoryId=1780

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:26:43 -0500
From: John Blau, IDG  <idg@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: VoIP on Cell Phones: Read the Fine Print -2


T-Mobile prohibits the use of VoIP services on its mobile phone networks.
John Blau, IDG News Service

As low-priced Internet phone services for mobile devices emerge, users
should first check the fine print in their cell phone contracts to see
if they can take advantage of such offerings. There's a chance they
can't.

T-Mobile International, which has mobile phone operations in Europe
and the United States, is among the first companies to ban the use of
VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol, or Internet-based telephone
service) over its networks. Its Web 'n' Walk professional service
expressly prohibits such usage, and the company reserves the right to
terminate contracts.

Like many other mobile phone companies, T-Mobile wants to protect its
cash-cow telephone service from new providers of VoIP-over-mobile
services, such as Mino Wireless USA.

Last week, the Sunnyvale, California, company launched one of the
world's first commercial VoIP-over-mobile services, offering fees as
low as US$0.02 per minute for international calls.

That's cheap -- really cheap -- compared to the $1 per minute or more
mobile phone users in many countries currently pay to make
international calls.

VoIP-Over-Mobile Providers

To use Mino, customers need to install the company's mobile VoIP 
application on a Java-enabled mobile phone.

Mino joins other VoIP heavyweights, such as Skype Technologies, a unit
of eBay. Earlier this year, Skype announced a VoIP partnership with
Hutchison 3 Group, which operates IP-based mobile broadband networks
in several European markets. The Skype mobile VoIP application runs on
Microsoft's Windows Mobile software.

Mobile VoIP startup Iskoot, which is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, is also working with Skype to allow users to make or
receive Internet calls with their mobile phones.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more tech news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/tech-news.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:01:53 -0500
From: Tom Zeller, Jr. <nytimes@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: ID Security Company Finds Snags in Fraud Alert System


By TOM ZELLER Jr.

Consumer advocates have long complained that the fraud alert system
mandated by Congress in 2003 as a consumer's first line of defense
against identity theft does not always work properly.

So a company seeking to enter the market for identity theft prevention
services recently recruited 54 data security and privacy experts to
test the system. They claim to have found some kinks, although the
credit reporting agencies beg to differ.

Julie Fergerson, vice president for emerging technologies at Debix,
the company that produced the study, said that in 40 percent of the
cases she examined, it appeared that fraud alerts had failed to put
all the reporting agencies on notice to prevent new credit accounts,
loans and other debts from being opened in a consumer's name without a
verifying phone call from the creditor.

The implication, Ms. Fergerson said, is that you've got millions of
people who think that they have fraud protection in place when
actually they don't.

But Norm Magnuson, a spokesman for the Consumer Data Industry
Association, which represents the major consumer reporting agencies,
including Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, suggested that those
findings were absurd.

The fraud alert response system is working as it should, contrary to
what the Debix report indicates, he said. Starting with the 54
consumers they surveyed, I'd question whether that's an adequate
number to base their conclusions on.

In updating the Fair Credit and Reporting Act in 2003, Congress
included rules intended to make it simpler for consumers to place
fraud warnings on their credit files, including a basic, 90-day alert
designed for identity theft victims, but available to anyone who wants
one.

Under the law, this alert can be established with a phone call to one
of the major consumer reporting companies, which must then refer the
information regarding the fraud alert to the others.

The Federal Trade Commission is charged with ensuring compliance.

The Debix study included privacy and consumer rights advocates, as
well as data security executives from Citigroup, Charles Schwab,
Expedia, Discover Financial and other companies.

Participants were registered for fraud alerts at one credit reporting
agency most at TransUnion, Ms. Fergerson said.

Of the 54 volunteers, 32 received confirmation letters within a week
or so the sign that things worked as they should. But in 22 cases,
something went awry.

In 18 cases, the fraud alert was set at only two agencies. In four
cases, it took hold at only one.

Ms. Fergerson surmised that in instances where formatting of data
name, date of birth or other essential information differed between
agencies, it was more likely that the fraud alert would not propagate
properly. Without access to the internal systems of the agencies, it
is impossible to know, however.

There's not a 40 percent failure rate, Mr. Magnuson asserted, although
he said there were no readily available statistics on any breakdowns
in the fraud alert system.

Mr. Magnuson also pointed out, in an e-mail message prepared in tandem
with representatives of the three credit reporting agencies, that
Debix has a business model that makes money by alleging that the fraud
alert process doesn't work.

Indeed, Debix is one of a growing list of companies promising, for a
fee, to alleviate the headache of keeping your credit file protected.

Ms. Fergerson said her company had shared the results of the study
with the trade commission. Betsy Broder, the assistant director of the
commission's division of privacy and identity protection, would not
comment on the agency's response, but noted that the fraud alert
system was still new.

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from NY Times, Christian Science Monitor 
and National Public Radio, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nytimes.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:05:39 -0500
From: Michael Smith <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please


By Michael Smith

Overhead "no smoking" signs will be replaced by "no cell phones" signs
on some planes next year when technology is introduced to make it safe
for passengers to use cell phones mid-flight.

Airlines are seeking ways to police potentially annoying on-board
phone chat via symbols of a cell phone crossed out, forcing passengers
to switch off during take-off and designated "night" periods.

The company developing the satellite technology for Airbus (EADS.PA)
planes also said cabin crew would be able to remotely switch off
phones or disable their voice function, allowing travelers to just use
text messaging and email during quiet times.

"It is envisaged that airlines will turn the voice capability off, for
example on long-haul flight during the plane's night'," a spokesman
for communications joint venture OnAir said.

"Each airline is likely to develop different protocols for the use of
mobile devices, in much the same way that different protocols have
developed in different countries for the public use of mobile phones."

Airbus said it was pushing ahead with plans for trials of cell phones,
blackberries and other devices on planes next year, despite heightened
security following a suspected bomb plot in Britain and setbacks for
on-board communications in the United States.

OnAir is a joint venture with Airbus and information technology
systems provider Sita.

Air France KLM (AIRF.PA) is expected to lead the way when it takes
deliveries of planes trialling the service in 2007, while low-cost
carrier Ryanair (RYA.I) is also close to ringing up extra revenue from
cell phones.

LEVEL OF ANNOYANCE

However, other carriers said they might limit the service to text
messages or ban it altogether, amid fears it will put passengers off
traveling unless it can be policed properly.

British Airways (BAY.L) said it was interested in the technology but
was surveying its passengers to see what level of cell phone use would
be acceptable or "downright annoying."

Germany's Lufthansa (LHAG.DE) was also cautious, saying it had not
decided whether to allow cell phone use on planes yet.

"The issue is how you would get around the problem of disturbing other
passengers," a Lufthansa spokesman said.

An Air France spokesman said the first phase of its trials would only
involve data services such as text messages with a second phase
covering voice.

TAP Portugal and Britain's bmi (BMID.UL) also plan trial the
technology.

In a consultation paper on the subject in April, UK regulator Ofcom
warned: "The potential for increased levels of agitation from
passengers is a factor to be noted."

But asked about the social cost of mid-air cell phones, the outspoken
chief of low-cost carrier Ryanair (RYA.I) Michael O'Leary said: "Why
should I care if it is generating some money?

"People are in a confined space. People tend to not want to get into
long and involved cell phone discussions with people sitting around
them. I think it will be more people sending texts," he told
reporters.

Advancements in airline communications have been slow to take off,
particularly in the U.S.

Boeing Co said last week it would shut its loss-making Connexion unit,
which allowed airlines to provide high-speed Internet service to
passengers. The satellite-based service, for which Boeing failed to
find a buyer, was too costly and few airlines signed on.

In June, Verizon Communications Inc. said it was cancelling its
on-board phone service by the end of the year.

(Additional reporting by James Regan in Frankfurt and Benoit Van 
Overstraeten in Paris)

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:33:49 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: AT&T Inks U-Verse Deal in San Antonio


USTelecom dailyLead
August 24, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emwQfDtusXbbeBJrHn

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* AT&T inks U-Verse deal in San Antonio
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Consumers benefit from video competition in New York
* Intel, Qualcomm square off in battle for wireless broadband dominance
* Microsoft dives into communications business
* AT&T picks HomePNA 3 over MoCA for home networking
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Is Your Network Secure?
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* CBS promos fall shows via Bluetooth
* Yahoo! teams with TV networks in streaming video pact
* Report: IPTV penetration to surge
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* AT&T files lawsuit to catch data thieves
* Verizon wins another video franchise in N.Y.
DIVERSIONS
* Fresh, Lively and Easygoing
* The (Tinsel) Town That Ate Superman
* Home Sales Fall to Unexpectedly Low Rate
* Sending Instant Messages to a Cellphone
* In Search of the Perfect Parking Spot for Cash

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/emwQfDtusXbbeBJrHn

------------------------------

From: Bryan Griffin <no_email@trashcan.com>
Subject: Taxes: Two Out Of Three Rule
Reply-To: no_email@trashcan.com
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:16 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


Hello all,

On the subject of taxes, can someone refresh my memory on the "two out
of three" rule when determining tax jurisdiction.

Thanks !

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Some Things Never Change: 350 Lines Tapped in NYC Over Two Years
Date: 24 Aug 2006 11:15:54 -0700


In the recent controversy over wiretaps of suspected terrorists, I
found an article in the New York Times describing the outcry over
wiretaps.  Seems that 350 phones were tapped by police over two
years -- back in May 1916 -- 90 years ago.  The article said wiretaps
started in 1895 -- 110 years ago.

The article dealt with the issues of wiretaps, who paid for them, what
they were used for, etc.

Other articles of that time frame dealt with charges that phone rates
were too high or too low.  Politicians claimed too high, the phone
company claimed too low to meet service demands.  There were constant
valuation studies going on with rate reductions ordered.

In 1916, it appeared the rate was roughly 5c for each local call, plus
line rental.  That's worth at least $1.00 today, probably more.  Some
sections could get unlimited residential service.

There was an apartment house rate: "for telephone switchboards of the
Monitor type [Monitor was capitalized] which are used extensively in
small apartment houses a rate of $132 for a switchboard of two
stations and one trunk line for 2,400 local calls per year, yielding
about 5.5c a call.  There was considerable pressure to drop this
particular rate to 5c a call to match other rates.  I presume this
arrangement was where a tennant used a phone on a pay-as-you-go basis.

The New York Times was filled with articles on telephone rates and
complaints about them in 1916.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 24, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:44:31 -0400 (EDT)


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 24, 2006
********************************

Broadband Surges to 72.6% of all British Internet Connections,
Regulator Calls for New Rules on VoIP
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19513?11228

     Barely a year after displacing dial-up access as the most popular
     way to connect to the internet in the United Kingdom, broadband
     now accounts for 72.6% of all connections, thanks to an
     impressive local loop unbundling (LLU) program and intense
     competition among providers. According to a report from the
     United Kingdom's Office of ...

Regulator Grants 29 WiMAX Licences in 2006, TeliaSonera Launches 100
Mbps Broadband
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19510?11228

     Finland's telecoms regulator, FICORA, has granted wireless
     broadband licences to 29 companies in Finland over 2006. FICORA said
     the licences, which would enable the companies to roll out WiMAX
     networks, were strongly competed for, although the regulator paid
     particular attention to promoting the efficiency of the
     communications ...

Motorola Files Defamation Case Against RussGPS and Biznes
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19507?11228

     U.S. equipment manufacturer Motorola has filed a lawsuit against
     a Russian satellite navigation technology company and Moscow
     business newspaper Biznes, reports Prime-Tass. Motorola is
     seeking 291 million roubles (US$10.88 million) for defamation,
     following RussGPS's allegations that the American group used
     its technology in the ...

Ericsson Signs Billion-dollar Deal to Expand Mobile Network in India
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19502?11228

     STOCKHOLM, Sweden -- Wireless equipment maker LM Ericsson said
     Thursday it has signed a US$1 billion (euro 780 million) deal
     with Indian mobile operator Bharti Airtel to expand its wireless
     networks.  The three-year contract, which also includes upgrades
     and technical support, will help Bharti Airtel improve its mobile
     coverage ...

Greece May Sell More of OTE Telecom
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19499?11228

     ATHENS, Greece -- Greece's conservative government may sell
     another stake of telecoms provider OTE next year as part of an
     ongoing privatization drive, Finance Minister Giorgos
     Alogoskoufis said.  The sale would cut the state's stake in the
     former monopoly from the 38.7 percent it currently controls.
     Alogoskoufis ...

Movida Turns to the Web, Expands Retail Reach
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19497?11228

     Pay-as-you-go wireless MVNO Movida Communications aims for
     ubiquity by now offering its customers the ability to top-up
     option cards on the Web. The company also is aggressively
     pursuing new retailer agreements that go beyond its partnership
     with Wal-Mart Stores.  Movida targets Hispanic customers by
     offering voice and data services ...

Russia Eyes Cellular Price Controls
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19495?11228

     Russian cellular operators are facing the possibility of more
     regulation by the government in a backlash against an attempt by
     three of the largest wireless carriers in the country to raise
     their rates.  Rate regulation would result from a bill just
     dropped in the hopper in the State Duma, the lower house of the
     Russian parliament, ...

Hopeful Satellite Signs
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19493?11228

     It hasn't been a good week for the satellite industry. Both
     DirecTV and EchoStar have dropped out of the bidding in the
     Federal Communications Commission (FCC) spectrum auction for
     Advanced Wireless Services. But a little-noticed news item out of
     Colombia, of all places, might provide a glimmer of hope for the
     beleaguered industry.  ...

Analyst: Cisco Sees VOIP Sales Bump in Q2
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19491?11228

     Increased sales of media gateways to carriers helped Cisco
     Systems Inc. report a big quarter in VOIP equipment, according to
     Synergy Research Group Inc.&nbsp; Synergy says Cisco's
     second-quarter VOIP gear revenues grew 72.3 percent over the
     first quarter. Cisco sold $67.5 million in VOIP gear, compared
     with $39.2 million the ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: Michael D. Sullivan <userid@camsul.example.invalid>
Subject: Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:43:58 GMT


On 8/22/2006 4:40 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> rbc310@gmail.com wrote:

>> Can anyone direct me to a PUC tariff on inter-carrier cellular roaming
>> charges?

> Is there even such a thing as PUC "tariffs" anymore on wireless
> services?  I thought they were completely deregulated and charges were
> based on your personal contract with the carrier.

> I know my own contract with my carrier (which is old) offers different
> roaming areas and charges than newer contracts do of the same carrier.
> The PUC has nothing to do with it.

That is correct.  State PUCs are explicitly deprived of jurisdiction
to regulate cellular rates by Section 221(b)(3) of the Communications
Act, 47 USC 221(b)(3).  This is true of both the carrier-consumer
rates, such as the ones governed by various contracts that may charge
different rates from contract to contract, and of the
carrier-to-carrier rates, which are governed by roaming agreements
between carriers.

> Also, I thought the concept of A/B switching on cell phones is
> obsolete.  Do modern cell phones even have that capability?  A/B dates
> back to the early days when there were only two carriers.  There are
> many today.

While A/B switching is largely obsolete, due to the fact that carriers
use a wide variety of digital standards and specialized software in
the phone, the FCC still requires that analog cellular phones (only
850 MHz phones, not PCS, not iDEN) be manually switchable to the A or
B block by the customer.  There has never been a similar requirement
for PCS band phones.  The option to select serving system is typically
buried very deep in the menu system.  Using it will probably result in
your being given greatly impaired service in many cases, as the phone
would not be able to be switched to the PCS band or the other 850 MHz
band automatically in accordance with the programmed list of host
systems (also known as the preferred roaming list).

Michael D. Sullivan
Bethesda, MD (USA)
(To reply, change example.invalid to com in the address.)

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
Subject:  Re: Three Texas Men With Cellphones Arrested on Terrorist Charges
Date:  Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:32:55 -0700
Organization:  Networks & Distributed Computing


On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> You said it yourself.  Reflashing is trivial on most *other* phones.
> From what I understand reflashing Motorola is fairly easy.  It's not
> so for Nokia unless you have invested in the specialized equipment,
> dongles, clips etc. to do it.  Considering the value of the typical
> phones used for TracFone or Net10 it's a lot of work for little
> profit.

Certainly that is the case for a single phone.  But in bulk, I can
easily see how the investment could pay off.  I took a look at
TracFone's website and a fair number of their el cheapo $20 phones are
Motorolas.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Organization: BellSouth Internet Service
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:53:10 -0400


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.311.10@telecom-digest.org...

> The deflation meant that if you owed money (like for a mortgage on the
> farm or house), it was harder to pay it since you had to work so much
> harder to get a dollar than in the past -- the dollar was worth more.
> We're used to inflation where the dollar declines and that benefits
> borrowers.

And that -- together with similar deflationary cycles every few
decades in the 19th century -- was one of the source of the notion
that it is inherently evil to be in debt, which is still reverberating
among some personal money management gurus.  The Great Depression was
the last deflationary cycle because we fundamentally changed the way
the money supply is controlled.  Going back to the gold standard, as
some people advocate, would bring back the deflationary cycles.

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:01:50 EDT
Subject: Re: What's This Telephone Related Item?


In a message dated 22 Aug 2006 13:35:27 -0700, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
writes:

> At the rate things are going pay phones will be gone eventually.  One
> factor is everyone having a cell phone.  Another factor is that local
> calls are cheap people will let you use their business lines; years
> ago that'd be too costly.

Businesses very commonly allowed customers and passersby to use
business phones.  Some even had telephones out on the counter or in
some other convenient locations for customers to use, even though the
telco tariffs prohibited this.  Telephone calls were measured rate
only in a small part of the United States, and there was little or no
incremental cost for a customer to use the phone in the vast part of
the U.S.A. that had flat rate service.

> Years ago employees were forbidden from using employer lines for
> personal calls, an edict strictly enforced.  In those days large
> workplaces often had payphones on every floor as well as banks in
> the lobby.  Today the lobbies of fancy businesses have house phones
> offering free local calls.

The reason for prohibiting employees from using employer lines, then
as now, is primarily because the loss of productivity when the
employee carries out personal activites when he or she is supposed to
be doing the employer's business.


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #312
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Fri Aug 25 14:41:38 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 5C3F221CA; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #313
Message-Id: <20060825184138.5C3F221CA@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:44:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 313

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    FCC Questions Verizon, Bell South Regards Internet Fee (Reuters News Wire)
    US Supercomputer Doubles its Speed (Duncan Mansfield, AP)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 25, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Call for Sessions Proposals: World Congress on Engineering WCE 2007 (imecs)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Train Station Pay Phones Mostly Removed (Anthony Bellanga)
    Re: What's This Telephone Related Item? (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please (jared)
    Re: Some Things Never Change: 350 Lines Tapped in NYC (2manyheadshotz)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:53:25 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: FCC Questions Verizon, Bell South Regards Internet Fee


Verizon Communications and BellSouth Corp. will be asked by U.S.
regulators to explain a new fee on high-speed Internet customers that
replaces a government surcharge that ended this month, a source
familiar with the matter said on Friday.

Verizon and BellSouth, the No. 2 and No. 3 telephone carriers
respectively, will be sent "letters of inquiry" to see whether the new
charge complies with Federal Communications Commission rules that
require "truth in billing," the source said on the condition of
anonymity.

The companies no longer have to pay a part of their high-speed
Internet revenue into the Universal Service Fund (USF), which
subsidizes communications services to schools, lower-income households
and rural areas, as of August 14.

They had passed that USF cost onto their customers. An FCC decision a
year ago phased out the USF fee for the telephone companies'
high-speed Internet service known as broadband.

However, Verizon said it would impose a new monthly surcharge of $1.20
or $2.70, beginning August 26, which it said was to help subsidize
connection costs. BellSouth said it has continued charging $2.97 a
month, equivalent to the old USF fee.

Verizon had charged digital subscriber line (DSL) Internet customers a
monthly fee of $1.25 or $2.83 to cover the USF contribution, depending
on connection speeds.

AT&T Inc., the largest U.S. telephone company, was not expected to
receive a letter from the FCC, the source said. Letters of inquiry are
typically the first step in an agency investigation into whether
enforcement action is warranted.

A spokeswoman for the FCC declined to comment. Verizon spokesman Brian
Blevins declined to comment while a BellSouth spokesman had no
immediate comment.

AT&T has agreed to buy BellSouth and needs the FCC to approve the
transaction.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I am glad the government noticed that
Verizon intends to continue sticking it to their customers, but I hope
with this 'truth in billing' thing, the feds at least require Verizon 
to quit claiming 'the government is making us collect it from customers.'
But, getting truth out of Verizon; that would be something new and novel,
wouldn't it!  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:56:19 -0500
From: Duncan Mansfield, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: US Supercomputer Doubles its Speed


By DUNCAN MANSFIELD, Associated Press Writer

The most powerful supercomputer available for general scientific
research in the United States has doubled its speed, officials said
Friday.

The 54-cabinet Cray XT3 supercomputer at Tennessee's Oak Ridge
National Laboratory has been upgraded from 25 teraflops to 54
teraflops, or 54 trillion mathematical calculations per second, they
said.

"It is probably the fifth-fastest machine" in the world, said Thomas
Zacharia, associate laboratory director. "It is clearly the fastest
open science machine in the U.S. today."

The supercomputer, dubbed "Jaguar," was ranked 13th fastest before the 
upgrade. A list of the 500 most powerful computers in the world is 
compiled by scientists at the University of Mannheim in Germany, 
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and the University of Tennessee.

"The list is a very simple measure, and it is a good thing, obviously," 
Zacharia said. "But the real winner in these things are the scientists 
who are running these machines.

"(They) have been very pleased at the initial performance of this 
upgraded machine," he said. "It is a terrific scientific instrument."

The overhaul was the first step in a multiyear, nearly $200 million
contract between Seattle-based Cray Inc. and the U.S. Department of
Energy to increase Oak Ridge's supercomputing capability to 1,000
trillion calculations per second, or one petaflop, by 2009.

The current world leader is the nearly six-times-faster 280.6 teraflop
IBM Blue Gene/L deployed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
in California and used for national defense purposes.

The Department of Energy has committed to make Oak Ridge's Jaguar
available for unclassified peer-reviewed research at least 80 percent
of the time.

DreamWorks Animation is interested in using the machine to develop new 
algorithms for duplicating the effects of light and shade called "ray 
tracing" in 3-D animation, Zacharia said. The results could show up in 
the company's animated feature films or in medical and occupational 
training.

Boeing Co. is hoping the supercomputer will lead to lighter, more
energy-efficient airplanes, and General Atomics Co. wants to do fusion
energy research, duplicating the power of the sun to light homes.

Another 68 cabinets will be added around November to double the
supercomputer's speed again to around 100 teraflops. A year later, the
installation of new processors should push capacity to 250 teraflops.
The lab is expected to swap out Jaguar for the next-generation Cray
supercomputer, currently code-named "Baker," in late 2008. At 1,000
teraflops, Baker would be roughly three times faster than any existing
computer in the world.

On the Net:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory: http://www.ornl.gov/
Cray Inc.: http://www.cray.com/

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I had thought the computer at
University of Illinois, Champaign/Urbana was the fastest anywhere.
Did this change?   PAT]

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 25, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:41:13 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 25, 2006
********************************

Belgacom Pays Vodafone 2 Billion for Full Control of Mobile Arm Proximus
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19530?11228

     Belgium's biggest telephone company, Belgacom SA, said Friday
     that it has agreed to buy Vodafone Group Plc's 25 percent stake
     in Proximus for 2 billion (US$2.6 billion), giving it full
     control of the mobile operator. Belgacom said it expected the
     deal would add 6 to 7 percent to next year's earnings citing ...

Norway's Telenor, Britain's The Cloud Team Up on 8,000 Wireless
Hotspots in 4 Countries
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19528?11228

     Norwegian telecommunications group Telenor ASA and Britain's The
     Cloud on Friday announced a wireless hotspot partnership for four
     countries.  The deal covers 8,000 wireless hotspots in Sweden,
     Denmark, Germany and Britain, a joint statement said. The
     companies said that includes 800 new hotspots to be built in
     Sweden and 500 in...

Survey Shows Mobile Phones Outstrip Fixed Lines Among European Households
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/105/19525?11228

     More European households have cell phones than fixed lines,
     according to a survey released Friday by the EU.  Eighty percent
     of households in the European Union have at least one mobile
     phone, compared with 78 percent of homes with a fixed telephone
     line.  About 18 percent rely only on their cell phones, having no
     fixed line. That ...

Lucent, Alcatel Seek U.S. Approval
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19523?11228

     Lucent Technologies is moving to the next phase in the approval
     process for it to become part of France's Alcatel. The latest: A
     request to start the deal&#39;s approval process in the United
     States has been filed with the U.S. Committee on Foreign
     Investment (CFIUS).  "We expect the U.S. government agencies
     to do a ...

PT Takeover Update: Regulator May Force Landline Sale
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19520?11228

     In what would be a surprise ruling, Portugal's Competition
     Authority (AdC) could force Sonae to divest Portugal Telecom's
     (PT) wireline assets if Sonae is successful in its $12.85 billion
     hostile takeover bid for the Portuguese telecom giant, according
     to rumors circulating in the country. Such a ruling would leave
     Sonae ...

Case in Point-to-Point
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19517?11228

     With the advent of WiMax, municipal mesh networks, and other
     forms of 'ubiquitous' wireless broadband coverage, it might seem
     that the 'last mile' problem, for years the bugaboo of
     enterprises wishing to connect to fiber-optic rings in metro
     areas, is already a thing of the past. That's not true for ...

Ericsson in $1B Bharti Expansion
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19515?11228

     With its mobile subscriber base growing at more than 1 million
     new signups every month, Bharti Airtel Ltd. has awarded Ericsson
     AB a monster $1 billion network expansion contract. Under the
     three-year deal, Ericsson will design, deploy, and manage
     additional network capacity across 15 regions for India's ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: imecs___2007@iaeng.org
Subject: Call for Sessions Proposals: World Congress on Engineering WCE 2007
Date: 24 Aug 2006 22:17:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Call for Special Sessions Proposals From:
IAENG: International Association of Engineers http://www.iaeng.org
Engineering Letters http://www.engineeringletters.com

World Congress on Engineering 2007
2-4 July, 2007, London, U.K.
http://www.iaeng.org/WCE2007

The organizing committee of the WCE 2007 invites proposals for the
congress. Or, the researchers are also welcome to join the existing
conference committee. The interested scholars are welcome to send
their proposal and the brief C.V. to publication{at}iaeng.org.

The session organizers will have the discretion of editing selected
papers into books or special journal issues. The sessions will be held
on the same date and venue as the congress.

The WCE 2007 is organized by the International Association of
Engineers (IAENG), a non-profit international association for the
engineers and the computer scientists. The conference has the focus on
the frontier topics in the theoretical and applied engineering and
computer science subjects.

The WCE 2007 is composed of 15 conferences (all will be held at the
same location and date). The WCE conferences serve as good platforms
for our members and the entire engineering community to meet with each
other and to exchange ideas. THE WCE conferences are formerly parts of
the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists
(IMECS). The last IMECS 2006 has attracted more than four hundred
participants from over 30 countries. Our IMECS committees have been
formed with over one hundred and sixty workshops co-chairs and
committees members who are mainly research center heads, faculty
deans, department heads, professors, and research scientists from over
20 countries.

The conference proceedings will be published by IAENG (ISBN:
978-988-98671-5-7) in hardcopy. The full-text congress proceeding will
be indexed in major database indexes so that it can be assessed
easily.  The Technology Research Databases (TRD) of CSA (Cambridge
Scientific Abstracts), DBLP and Computer Science Bibliographies have
promised to index the print proceeding in advance of its
publication. And after the publication of the proceeding, print copies
will also be sent to databases like IEE INSPEC, Engineering Index (EI)
and ISI Thomson Scientific for indexing. The accepted papers will also
be considered for publication in the special issues of the journal
Engineering Letters. Some participants may also be invited to submit
extended version of their conference papers for considering as book
chapters (soon after the conference).

The following conferences are held as parts of the WCE 2007:

ICAEM'07
The 2007 International Conference of Applied and Engineering Mathematics

ICCIIS'07
The 2007 International Conference of Computational Intelligence and
Intelligent Systems

ICCSDE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Computational Statistics and Data
Engineering

ICCSE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Computer Science and Engineering

ICDMKE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Data Mining and Knowledge
Engineering

ICEEE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering

ICFE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Financial Engineering

ICIE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Information Engineering

ICISIE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Information Security and Internet
Engineering

ICME'07
The 2007 International Conference of Mechanics Engineering

ICMEEM'07
The 2007 International Conference of Manufacturing Engineering and
Engineering Management

ICPDC'07
The 2007 International Conference of Parallel and Distributed Computing

ICSBB'07
The 2007 International Conference of Systems Biology and Bioengineering

ICSIE'07
The 2007 International Conference of Signal and Image Engineering

ICWN'07
The 2007 International Conference of Wireless Networks

=========
Submission:

WCE 2007 is now accepting manuscript submissions. Prospective authors
are invited to submit their draft paper in full paper (any appropriate
style) to WCE{at}iaeng.org by 6 March, 2007. The submitted file can be
in MS Word format, PS format, or PDF formats.

The first page of the draft paper should include:
(1) Title of the paper;
(2) Name, affiliation and e-mail address for each author;
(3) A maximum of 5 keywords of the paper.

Also, the name of the conference that the paper is being submitted to
should be stated in the email.

=============
Important Dates:

Proposals for special conference sessions and tutorials deadline: 
30 December, 2006
Draft Paper Submission Deadline: 6 March, 2007
Camera-Ready papers & Pre-registration Due: 30 March, 2007
WCE 2007: 2-4 July, 2007

It is our target that the reviewing process and the result notification
for each submitted manuscript can be completed within one month from
its submission.

More details about the WCE 2007 can be found at:
http://www.iaeng.org/WCE2007/index.html

More details about the International Association of Engineers, the
journal Engineering Letters and the IAENG International Journal of
Computer Science can be found at:

http://www.iaeng.org/about_IAENG.html
http://www.engineeringletters.com
http://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/index.html

********

It will be highly appreciated if you can circulate these calls for
papers to your colleagues.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Date: 25 Aug 2006 07:03:48 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


mc wrote:

> And that -- together with similar deflationary cycles every few
> decades in the 19th century -- was one of the source of the notion
> that it is inherently evil to be in debt, which is still reverberating
> among some personal money management gurus.  The Great Depression was
> the last deflationary cycle because we fundamentally changed the way
> the money supply is controlled.  Going back to the gold standard, as
> some people advocate, would bring back the deflationary cycles.

What terrifies me is inflationl, esp what we had in the 1980s.
Inflation is basically a tax, a very unfair tax.

It discourages savings and encourages wasteful consumption.

There are many who do like inflation for various selfish reasons
because their particular segment of the economy is strengthened; but
at the expense of everyone else.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:41:28 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@notchur.biz
Reply-To: no-spam@no-spam.no-spam
Subject: Re: Train Station Pay Phones Mostly Removed


********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.
********************************************************************

Lisa Hancock <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> NJ Transit will move 22 pay phones from its Trenton RR station.
> Three phones will remain in a different location.  The old phones
> were located as a battery along the wall of the concourse.  They
> were flush mounted panel style, with no separations between them.
> The remaining phones are in a different spot.  Removal is part of
> station reconstruction. I'd like to get a picture of the phone
> bank since that kind of thing will not be scene (sic) again, but
> the cops in the station are very fussy about picture taking.

If your cellphone has a camera, use that. "They" can't necessarily
prove that you are taking pictures, since you could always claim that
you were simply looking at the display screen of your cellphone to
scroll down the list of stored phone numbers, or the list of recent
incoming/outgoing calls. I take all kinds of pictures that way!

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: What's This Telephone Related Item?
Date: 24 Aug 2006 14:02:25 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Wesrock@aol.com wrote:

> Businesses very commonly allowed customers and passersby to use
> business phones.  Some even had telephones out on the counter or in
> some other convenient locations for customers to use, even though the
> telco tariffs prohibited this.  Telephone calls were measured rate
> only in a small part of the United States, and there was little or no
> incremental cost for a customer to use the phone in the vast part of
> the U.S.A. that had flat rate service.

I could understand in a small town where people could come in and use
the phone, especially when it didn't cost anything.  But small town
life is different than city life.  In the downtown of a large city
there were too many people going by and you needed some controls.  If
you allowed anyone to come in and use the phone it would be always
tied up and you'd pay a fortune for it.

While I agree that a "vast part of the U.S. had flat rate service", I
wonder if that's more a function of land size rather than population.
I'm not sure how big a city had to be to get measured services.  In
other words, I suspect a much larger part of the population of the
country, esp postwar, was served by measured rate lines.

Smaller towns may have had flat rate service, but they were also party
line oriented.  I remember seeing old small town directories and
almost all lines -- business and residential -- had a party line code
on them.  That meant sharing the line and the need to keep it open for
other parties to use it.

Another factor in small towns was that the local area -- your free
calling option -- was very small.  Anywhere beyond was long distance.
The toll might be only a dime or 15c, but still a toll.  In contrast,
the local zone in a city could encompass a million people.

> The reason for prohibiting employees from using employer lines, then
> as now, is primarily because the loss of productivity when the
> employee carries out personal activites when he or she is supposed to
> be doing the employer's business.

That was part of it, but the cost and tie-up of a line was a big part
of it.  It was common for companies to have pay phones in hallways of
each floor for employees to use.  That meant an employee had to leave
their work station to use the phone which was a longer loss of
worktime than making a call from their desk.

In constant dollars, the cost of a local city call would be about
$1.00 today back in the early 1960s and more before.  If many
employees are making calls frequently, that would add up to some
serious money plus tie up lines and trunks which weren't as plentiful
as today.  (Many companies had internal private intercoms or PABX
within the workplace.)

In Philadelphia, a separate phone company, Keystone, offered
businesses flat rate lines and was popular for that reason.

As discussed here, the cost of too many phone calls as late as 1971
warranted a plot line in a TV sitcom where the parents put in a
payphone for the gabbing kids.  That plot line would be mysterious
today since every kid has his own cell phone with hundreds of hours of
talk time.  But back then message units added up to serious money, and
even more so as you go backward.  Local phone rates did go up over
time, but not as much as inflation.

In the early days of manual phones, according to the NYT, there was an
moderately enforced 5 minute limit to calls.  Somewhere they developed
timed message units to go on the meters.  Of course toll calls, even
short distance ones, were timed.

I wonder how long talkers were handled in the older days.  I don't know
what the tarffis were.  Manual operators in small towns would see it
quickly.  In automated offices, if trunking was a problem they'd be
watching and catch it.  Trunks were expensive in those days and
limited.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:58:24 -0600
From: jared@netspacenospamnet.au (jared)
Subject: Re: Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please


> "People are in a confined space. People tend to not want to get into
> long and involved cell phone discussions with people sitting around
> them. I think it will be more people sending texts," he told
> reporters.

Obviously the loud ones heard in an airport waiting area don't mind. Same
behaviour during the periods before the airplane pushes back or after it
lands. So there will be a new headache for air travel.

*****

Apparently one technology is to have a 'pico cell' on-board. The pico
cell can be set by the air crew to enable text, voice or whatever. The
theory is that the passenger mobile phones will connect to the pico
cell rather than boosting power to reach a ground cell.

Must be a risk that, one way or another, there is a ground connection,
increasing the potential for on-board RFI and incidentally avoiding
what ever the airlines' call charges may be.

------------------------------

From: 2manyheadshotz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Some Things Never Change: 350 Lines Tapped in NYC Over Two Years
Date: 24 Aug 2006 21:30:18 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I also suggest you look at:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff179818.htm

hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> In the recent controversy over wiretaps of suspected terrorists, I
> found an article in the New York Times describing the outcry over
> wiretaps.  Seems that 350 phones were tapped by police over two
> years -- back in May 1916 -- 90 years ago.  The article said wiretaps
> started in 1895 -- 110 years ago.

> The article dealt with the issues of wiretaps, who paid for them, what
> they were used for, etc.

> Other articles of that time frame dealt with charges that phone rates
> were too high or too low.  Politicians claimed too high, the phone
> company claimed too low to meet service demands.  There were constant
> valuation studies going on with rate reductions ordered.

> In 1916, it appeared the rate was roughly 5c for each local call, plus
> line rental.  That's worth at least $1.00 today, probably more.  Some
> sections could get unlimited residential service.

> There was an apartment house rate: "for telephone switchboards of the
> Monitor type [Monitor was capitalized] which are used extensively in
> small apartment houses a rate of $132 for a switchboard of two
> stations and one trunk line for 2,400 local calls per year, yielding
> about 5.5c a call.  There was considerable pressure to drop this
> particular rate to 5c a call to match other rates.  I presume this
> arrangement was where a tennant used a phone on a pay-as-you-go basis.

> The New York Times was filled with articles on telephone rates and
> complaints about them in 1916.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #313
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Aug 26 17:21:04 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 75B4521D8; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:20:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #314
Message-Id: <20060826212025.75B4521D8@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:20:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:22:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 314

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Poor Walmart Had Troubles Friday Night (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Bell South Agrees to Drop Bogus DSL 'Fee' After FCC Threat (Reuters News)
    Man Gets Three Years in Prison for 'Botnet' Attack on Computers (AP News)
    Feds Just Can't Hack It (Daily News Editorial)
    Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (Tim Korte, AP)
    Telecom Update #543 (John Riddell)
    Re: Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please (Ron Kritzman)
    Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force (mc)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Poor Walmart Had Troubles Friday Night
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:29:45 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


Here in Independence, we had a very badly needed rain storm Friday
night, and more rain is expected Saturday night as well. What we did
not need however were the excessively strong winds which caused a very
major power line to fall down next to the Walmart Supercenter on West
Main Street.  About half the town remains without power as I write
this on Saturday afternoon. Walmart had to do the unthinkable, and
close their store, leaving it in darkness. Normally our Walmart is 24/7.

All of us, even us on the east side of town were in the dark with no
air conditioning or refrigeration for several hours, however about 5
AM this morning, Westar/KGE got _some_ of us back on line, but they
were blunt in saying 'residences, hospitals, old people's home, etc
will come first, then _business places_ last. It was pretty dire
around here over night and I lost close to a hundred dollars worth of
refrigerator/freezer food during the eight hours I was without
power. (7:30 PM to about 5:00 AM).  I guess they re-wired some of us
through the Coffeyville Power and Light Company facility, but ...
residents on the far west side of town were still out as of this
writing, including Walmart and the businesses in that area.  

Walmart is going to stay closed over the weekend in order to restock
all their frozen grocery items, and when Raymond (my household/personal
helper these days due to my illness) drove over there about 10 AM his
report was that Main Street where it meets the highway is totally
blocked off to all except local traffic, police steering people away
from the area, and Westar is out there with a crane and other tools,
uprighting and reinstalling the downed and dangerous power line. Plus,
there are a large number of trees down all over town.

So, that's the news from here in Independence this week!

PAT

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:20:34 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Bell South Agrees to Drop Bogus DSL 'Fee' After FCC Threat


BellSouth Corp., the No. 3 U.S. local telephone company, on Friday
said it will immediately drop a $2.97 monthly fee for high-speed
Internet service after U.S. communications regulators threatened to
investigate the charge, and punish them for imposing it.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission had been poised to send a 
letter of inquiry to BellSouth asking the carrier to explain the new 
fee, which replaces a surcharge for a government subsidy program, FCC 
officials said.

Most customers would see the change on their bills within a week, but
it could take up to six weeks, BellSouth said. It added that customers
charged the fee dating back to August 16 would receive a credit.

However, the FCC's enforcement bureau on Friday did send a letter to
Verizon Communications, the No. 2 U.S. telephone company, for
information on its own new charge instituted to replace the fee for
the government program.

"The bureau is investigating whether Verizon's practices are
consistent with the obligations set forth in the commission's
Truth-in-Billing rules," said the letter, which requires a response
within 20 days.

The FCC could seek enforcement action, including fines, against the 
company if any regulations have been violated.

As of August 14, providers of high-speed Internet service, known as
broadband, are no longer required to contribute part of that revenue
to the Universal Service Fund (USF), which subsidizes communications
services to schools, lower-income households and rural areas.

The carriers had passed that USF cost onto their customers, but an FCC
decision last year phased out the USF fee for the telephone companies'
high-speed Internet service.

Still, BellSouth continued charging its nearly 3.3 million high-speed
Internet customers $2.97, and Verizon said it would impose a new
monthly surcharge of $1.20 or $2.70, beginning August 26, which it
claimed was to 'help subsidize connection costs'.

Verizon had charged broadband customers a monthly fee of $1.25 or
$2.83 to cover its USF contribution, depending on connection speeds.

"When the FCC phases out a fee and a major broadband provider rushes
in to replace it with a new company surcharge, consumers get burned,"
said FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, a Democrat. "Pulling a fast one
like this won't fool consumers and I don't think it will fool the
commission either."

Verizon spokesman Eric Rabe said the company received the FCC letter
and would respond. He also said that Verizon informed customers about
the fee, the reasons for it and posted a notice on its Web site.

A spokeswoman for the FCC declined to comment.

AT&T has agreed to buy BellSouth and needs the FCC to approve the
transaction. AT&T Inc., the largest U.S. telephone company, did not
impose a replacement fee and the FCC did not send the company an
inquiry letter.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:23:48 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Man Gets Three Years in Prison for 'Botnet' Attack on Computers


A man was sentenced to three years in prison Friday for launching a
computer attack that hit tens of thousands of computers, including
some belonging to the Department of Defense, a Seattle hospital and a
California school district.

Christopher Maxwell, 21, of Vacaville, Calif., was also sentenced to
three years of supervised release when his prison sentence is
finished. He pleaded guilty in May to federal charges of conspiracy to
intentionally cause damage to a protected computer and conspiracy to
commit computer fraud.

U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman said the crime showed "incredible 
self-centeredness" with little regard for the impact on others. She said 
the prison time was needed as "deterrence for all those youth out there 
who are squirreled away in their basements hacking. "

Defense attorney Steve Bauer had sought probation and community service, 
noting his client had no prior criminal record and saying Maxwell did 
not intend his robot virus program to spread as far as it did.

Maxwell and two juvenile co-conspirators were accused of using "botnet" 
attacks -- programs that let hackers infect and control a computer 
network -- to install unwanted Internet advertising software, a job that 
earned them about $100,000.

Three victims testified at Maxwell's sentencing: a representative of
Seattle's Northwest Hospital, damaged in February 2005; a
representative of the U.S. Defense Department, which reported damage
to hundreds of computers worldwide in 2004 and 2005; and a former
system administrator for the Colton Unified School District in
California, where more than 1,000 computers were damaged over several
months in 2005.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.  

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines daily from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:26:23 -0500
From: Daily News Editorial <dailynews@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Feds Just Can't Hack It

 
By all indications, our nation's most sensitive data and computer
systems have woefully poor protection against hackers, thieves and
terrorists. Scandal could turn into national tragedy if the Department
of Homeland Security doesn't get its act together pronto.  It has been
more than a year since Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff
promised to name an assistant secretary devoted to cyberspace security
but the job remains unfilled. There are few takers for the job -- in
fact, three cybersecurity officials resigned -- because the White
House decided to put the chief of information security in a
low-ranking slot, without daily access to Chertoff.

This bureaucratic foolishness and paralysis comes more than three
years after the White House published a 60-page National Strategy to
Secure Cyberspace, which noted that "in the past few years, threats in
cyberspace have risen dramatically ... We must act to reduce our
vulnerabilities to these threats before they can be exploited."

Computers and the Internet are used to control and coordinate
airports, radio stations, electric utilities and radio communications
between first responders. Imagine how much worse the panic and death
toll on 9/11 might have been if New York were left without electric
power, without access to computers and without working phones, radio,
television or traffic lights.

A cyberattack could plunge all or part of the nation into chaos.

Still, federal bureaucrats have their heads stuck in the sand. In May, 
red-faced officials at the Veterans Affairs Department acknowledged that 
sensitive personal information on more than 26 million veterans -- 
including names, addresses and Social Security numbers -- had gone 
missing. The data wasn't lifted by hackers: it was stored, uncoded, on a 
computer taken home by a government official whose last security 
background check took place 32 years ago.

It gets worse.

The head of the VA acknowledged he wasn't even informed of the data
theft until two weeks after the fact. And while the computer
eventually turned up with no harm done, Pedro Cadenas, the agency's
cybersecurity chief, quit -- telling Government Executive magazine that
"the department has no interest in doing the right thing," and that
he'd only met the Veterans Affairs secretary once, at a social event.

The laxity of the Veterans Affairs Department isn't an isolated case;
several federal departments - including Defense and Homeland Security
- have received a grade of F for the past few years on a Computer
Security Report Card issued by Congress. The government's overall
grade is D-plus.

Every day, according to a recent report in The Washington Post,
hackers make more than 2,000 attempts to crack the Department of
Agriculture's computers -- and apparently succeeded a few weeks ago,
leading the agency to announce that personal data on more than 26,000
contractors and active and retired employees may have been stolen.

Last year, an unknown intruder got into a computer at the National 
Nuclear Security Administration, a division of the Department of Energy 
that monitors the safety and reliability of military nuclear weapons. 
Information on more than 1,500 agency workers and outside contractors 
was stolen. Incredibly, the security breach wasn't reported to senior 
officials; it was buried with more than 830 other incidents the agency 
experienced last year. Hiding such breaches is common, according to 
government auditors.

Years before the 9/11 terrorist attack and the destruction of New 
Orleans, federal officials were warned about grave danger, and did too 
little to prepare for it.

Chertoff has got to do better -- before it gets worse.

Originally published on July 25, 2006

All contents copyright 2006 Daily News, L.P.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:29:58 -0500
From: Tim Korte, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision


By TIM KORTE, Associated Press Writer

The widow of the astronomer who discovered Pluto 76 years ago said
Thursday she was frustrated by the decision to strip it of its
planetary status, but she added that Clyde Tombaugh would have
understood.

"I'm not heartbroken. I'm just shook up," Patricia Tombaugh, 93, said
in a telephone interview from her home in Las Cruces.

Clyde Tombaugh was 24 when he discovered Pluto while working at Lowell
Observatory in Flagstaff, Ariz., in 1930. He spent months meticulously
examining images of the sky, looking for a planet observatory founder
Percival Lowell theorized was affecting the orbit of Uranus. Lowell
was wrong -- Pluto is too small to affect giant Neptune's orbit --
but Tombaugh found it anyway.

Tombaugh, who died in 1997, was the only person in the Western
Hemisphere to have discovered a planet in our solar system until
Thursday, when the International Astronomical Union separated it from
the eight "classical planets" and lumped it in with two similarly
sized "dwarf planets."

Tombaugh had fought off other attempts to relegate Pluto, but his
widow said this time he probably would have endorsed the change, now
that other planetary objects have been discovered in the Kuiper Belt,
the belt of comets on the edge of the solar system where Pluto
resides.

"He was a scientist. He would understand they had a real problem when
they start finding several of these things flying around the place,"
Patricia Tombaugh said.

She added that her husband had been resigned to the change.

"He knew it was on the way," she said. "Before he died, they were
going around and around. Of course, he was disappointed. After 75
years of seeing it one way, who wouldn't be?"

Planetary astronomers at Lowell Observatory expressed disappointment.
Director Bob Millis said he preferred a rejected proposal that would
have added three planets to the solar system instead of dropping
Pluto.

Closing the door to additional planetary discoveries is "not exactly
motivational to young planetary scientists and astronomers," Millis
said.

At New Mexico State University, where Clyde Tombaugh worked from
1955-73 and founded the research astronomy department, the news about
Pluto was received somewhat glumly.

"To come up with a new classification shows science is not
static. It's good to show that to the world," said Jim Murphy, an
associate professor and department head. "I suppose our reaction is
more emotional. I don't want anyone to think anything less of the
discovery by Clyde Tombaugh in 1930."

Tombaugh's legacy is visible across Las Cruces, where an observatory,
a campus street and an elementary school bear his name.

Murphy said Tombaugh's discovery was ahead of its time because it took
60 years for stronger telescopes to locate another object with an
unusual orbit like Pluto's, and 73 years before scientists discovered
a bigger object in the area.

He said the declaration won't change Pluto's importance to science.

"Pluto didn't cease to exist," Murphy said. "It didn't lose or gain
any atoms. Its physical characteristics haven't changed a bit because
of this. It already was perceived to be a member of a larger group of
objects."

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: When our power came back on Saturday
morning, the Independence High School cable TV station had a program
on interviewing one of the astronomy teachers who noted that "all the
textbooks we have used in my memory have included Pluto as one of
'our' planets. (Flashback showing a classroom scene, with a textbook
open to pages discussing Pluto.) I guess new textbooks will revise all
that."  PAT]

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #543
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:44 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>



************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************
published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group=20
http://www.angustel.ca

Number 543: August 25, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous=20

financial support from:

** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page=20
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/=20
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** MITEL NETWORKS: www.mitel.com/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions=20
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

************************************************************

IN THIS ISSUE:

** CRTC Asked to Enforce VoIP 9-1-1 Procedures
** Bell Fires Salvo in Broadband Wars
** AOL Privacy Breach Leads to Dismissals
** AT&T Sues Brokers over Customer Information
** Mitel Upgrades Mobility Portfolio
** NEC Adds Managed IP Telephony
** Avaya Upgrades Call Centre, Teleworker Software
** Founder Raises Bid for Inter-Tel
** IBM Buys Security Company
** MTS Offers High-Definition TV
** Telehop Net Income Rises
** Correction--Rogers Home Phone
** Feelings Mixed on Anytime Connectivity

CRTC ASKED TO ENFORCE VoIP 9-1-1 PROCEDURES: 9-1-1 call centre providers
in eight provinces have told the CRTC that most of the 9-1-1 calls
forwarded by VoIP providers reach them over administrative lines not
designed for emergency use, creating "a safety risk for the public."

** The 9-1-1 agencies ask the Commission (1) to tell VoIP
   service providers to adhere to the call routing provisions
   of Telecom Decision 2006-5 and Telecom Order 2006-168 and
   (2) to tell Local Exchange Carriers to include this
   requirement in contracts with VoIP providers. (See Telecom
   Update #515)

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2006/8663/8663_06.htm#200610312

BELL FIRES SALVO IN BROADBAND WARS: Bell Canada is rolling out its 16
Mbps Sympatico Optimax Internet access service across Toronto. The
service debuted in Montreal last month. Price: $100 per month; a 10 Mbps
version can be had for $75/month. (See Telecom Update #542)

AOL PRIVACY BREACH LEADS TO DISMISSALS: AOL has announced the
resignation of its CTO and has fired two other employees in connection
with the recent posting on the Internet of three months' worth of
search queries by 650,000 customers. The query sequences, which
included intimate and sometimes identifiable data, were widely
reposted and discussed on the Net. AOL says it is taking action to
prevent a recurrence.

AT&T SUES BROKERS OVER CUSTOMER INFORMATION: AT&T has sued 25 data
brokers for fraudulently setting up thousands of online billing accounts
using the identities of the telco's customers. The accounts can be used
to obtain and sell the customers' calling histories.

MITEL UPGRADES MOBILITY PORTFOLIO: Mitel Networks has announced a
"second generation" enterprise mobility portfolio that gives
softphones and teleworker devices encrypted access to the PBX's voice,
presence, secure IM, and Web collaboration features, without using a
Virtual Private Network.

** Mitel also now offers Quick Conferencing, an 8 to 32-port
   SIP-based audio conferencing bridge.

NEC ADDS MANAGED IP TELEPHONY: NEC Unified Solutions now offers
Managed IP Telephony, consisting of its Univerge IP-PBX platform plus
maintenance and management services, for a monthly fee. "Essential"
and "Comprehensive" options provide differing levels of data network
support.

AVAYA UPGRADES CALL CENTRE, TELEWORKER SOFTWARE: Avaya has released
version 7.1 of its Interaction Center product, which adds a new
software development kit.

** Version 2.0 of VPNremote for IP Phones adds support for
   Cisco and Juniper VPN environments.

FOUNDER RAISES BID FOR INTER-TEL: An investment group including Steven
Mihaylo has raised its offer to buy Inter-Tel to about US$615 million.
Mihaylo is founder and former CEO of the Arizona-based business
communications systems manufacturer.

IBM BUYS SECURITY COMPANY: IBM Corp. has agreed to acquire Atlanta-based
Internet Security Systems, which provides enterprises with managed
security services, for US$1.3 billion.

MTS OFFERS HIGH-DEFINITION TV: Manitoba Telecom's TV subscribers can
now receive up to seven High Definition channels for $4.99 a month
(forgivable for customers on contract) plus $349 for equipment and an
installation fee.

TELEHOP NET INCOME RISES: Telehop Communications, a Toronto-based long
distance carrier, reports a profit of $483,785 for the six months
ended June 30, four times as high as during the same period last
year. Revenue edged up 3.9% to $10.2 million.

CORRECTION -- ROGERS HOME PHONE: Telecom Update #542 incorrectly reported
that Rogers had added residential phone service to several small cities 
in Ontario using cable telephony. In fact, Rogers is providing the
expanded coverage with circuit-switched lines.

FEELINGS MIXED ON ANYTIME CONNECTIVITY: A Korn/Ferry International
survey of 2,300 global executives found that 81% have their
communications devices on all the time. 77% say the devices enhance
their work/life balance, but more than a third (38%) believe they spend
too much time connected.

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE
E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the
   World Wide Web late Friday afternoon each week
   at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.
   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:

      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send
   an e-mail message to:

      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further information,
including permission to reprint or reproduce, please e-mail 
jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from sources which
we believe to be reliable, but Angus TeleManagement makes no
warranties or representations whatsoever regarding accuracy,
completeness, or adequacy.  Opinions expressed are based on
interpretation of available information, and are subject to change. If
expert advice on the subject matter is required, the services of a
competent professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:11:56 -0500
From: Ron Kritzman <ron@dbOnayAmspaYmasters.com>
Subject: Re: Fasten Your Seatbelts and No Cell Phones Please


Michael Smith wrote:

> Overhead "no smoking" signs will be replaced by "no cell phones" signs
> on some planes next year when technology is introduced to make it safe
> for passengers to use cell phones mid-flight....

Great timing. <snicker> You'll be allowed to use cell phones in flight
but you won't be allowed to carry them on board.

    - Ron

Emoveray ethay Igpay Atinlay otay eplyray

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Dial Conversion - Depression Labor Force
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:12:26 -0400


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.313.5@telecom-digest.org:

> mc wrote:

>> And that -- together with similar deflationary cycles every few
>> decades in the 19th century -- was one of the source of the notion
>> that it is inherently evil to be in debt, which is still reverberating
>> among some personal money management gurus.  The Great Depression was
>> the last deflationary cycle because we fundamentally changed the way
>> the money supply is controlled.  Going back to the gold standard, as
>> some people advocate, would bring back the deflationary cycles.

> What terrifies me is inflationl, esp what we had in the 1980s.
> Inflation is basically a tax, a very unfair tax.

> It discourages savings and encourages wasteful consumption.

> There are many who do like inflation for various selfish reasons
> because their particular segment of the economy is strengthened; but
> at the expense of everyone else.

Right.  That, of course, is the case with *unexpected* inflation.  If
inflation is expected and fairly constant, interest rates and
long-term plans will incorporate it and people will be back where they
started, mostly.

Unexpected inflation makes it easier to buy a house (by paying it off
in smaller dollars) and makes it easier to pay off student loans
(which is probably going to be a big issue in 10 years, when a lot of
the population will be burdened with them).

But it is basically a tax on the *middle* class.  The upper class has
investments that are inflation-proof.  The lower class doesn't have
savings.  Inflation attacks people who are building up savings and are
on the threshold of achieving some financial security.

See Ben Bernanke's book, _Inflation Targeting_.  He argues that (1)
there should be measurable goals of monetary policy (so we can tell
whether policies are successful), and controlling inflation is the
most obvious one; (2) deflation is worse than inflation, but neither
is very good; (3) to avoid deflation, and for another reason I'll get
to, the CPI inflation rate should be about 2.5%.

The other reason is that the Consumer Price Index doesn't take account
of shifts in lifestyles.  Typically, when some goods become more
expensive while others become cheaper, people change what they buy.
E.g., we now buy a lot more telecommunications, and less fancy
clothing, than people did 50 years ago.  The Consumer Price Index does
not take these lifestyle shifts into account, at least not very
rapidly, so Bernanke argues that 2.5% CPI inflation equals no real
rise in cost of living.

This is the first time we've had a Fed chief who came with
documentation, so to speak.  Prior to taking office, Bernanke had
already written books saying exactly what he thought out to be done.
I wish all politics worked this way.

ObTelecom:  How about an FCC chief?

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #314
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sun Aug 27 23:24:08 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id D56DD21C9; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #315
Message-Id: <20060828032407.D56DD21C9@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:25:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 315

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Man in Texas Stops Burglary in UK via Web (Reuters News Wire)
    Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP, Could This be Kept (Filpo)
    Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs (Raqueeb Hassan)
    Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (mc)
    Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: Feds Just Can't Hack It (Wesrock@aol.com)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:31:00 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Man in Texas Stops Burglary in UK via Web


An American helped foil a burglary in northern England whilst watching
a Beatles-related webcam over the Internet, police said on Friday.

The man from Dallas was using a live camera link to look at Mathew
Street, an area of Liverpool synonymous with the Beatles and home to
the Cavern Club where the band regularly played.

He saw intruders apparently breaking into a sports store and alerted
local police.

"We did get a call from someone in Dallas who was watching on a webcam
that looks into the tourist areas, of which Mathew Street is one
because of all the Beatles stuff," a Merseyside Police spokeswoman
said.

"He called directly through to police here." Officers were sent to the 
scene and three suspects were arrested.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: ivan.filpo@gmail.com
Subject: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP, Could This be Kept?
Date: 26 Aug 2006 19:51:38 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I am very anxious about transferring my local phone number to Vonage
because I am worried that users that can call me for free now, will no
longer be able to. I live in the border line of two area codes, 225
and 985, I can call my friends 985 number locally, no long distance
charge, with my 225 number. However, since the number that vonage
temporatily assigned to me is considered long distance to this town, I
am scared that even though my current phone is local it might become a
distant number.

According to what I have read about LNP, when porting numbers from one
telco to another, you should remain in the same physical area; meaning
that I should be able to still call my friends without the need to
dial 1 and viceversa, as one would for long distance numbers. However,
I do not want a mistake like porting my number from local to long
distance to happen, and therefore, feel very anxious about this step
and I am for confirmation that what I understood is right and that
according to FCC rules it should remain local.

Currently Vonage gave me a temporary phone line, but since I guess low
requests in this area since most people dont have internet, they were
not able to give me a local number, and therefore cant receive calls
unless callers dial 1. However, something else tells me that by
porting my current phone vonage will gain or have access to a phone
line in this area and should keep it local, at least that is what
common sense tells me, but just need to confirm since I cant afford to
make this mistake.

I understand that if exchanging local carriers the number should
remain as local, but Vonage is over the internet and does not seem it
would remain local, but it could with third party exchange carriers.

Finally, should I be completely sure that my line will port and that
will remain local?

Thanks for reading and all your help.

Ivan

------------------------------

From: Raqueeb Hassan <wideangle@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs
Date: 27 Aug 2006 08:57:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Michael D. Sullivan wrote:

> On 8/22/2006 4:40 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> > rbc310@gmail.com wrote:

>>> Can anyone direct me to a PUC tariff on inter-carrier cellular roaming
>>> charges?

>> Is there even such a thing as PUC "tariffs" anymore on wireless
>> services?  I thought they were completely deregulated and charges were
>> based on your personal contract with the carrier.

>> I know my own contract with my carrier (which is old) offers different
>> roaming areas and charges than newer contracts do of the same carrier.
>> The PUC has nothing to do with it.

> That is correct.  State PUCs are explicitly deprived of jurisdiction
> to regulate cellular rates by Section 221(b)(3) of the Communications
> Act, 47 USC 221(b)(3).  This is true of both the carrier-consumer
> rates, such as the ones governed by various contracts that may charge
> different rates from contract to contract, and of the
> carrier-to-carrier rates, which are governed by roaming agreements
> between carriers.

<snip>

Well, I guess that applies in US within, what happens in other part of
the world? I'm interested on the inter-carrier cellular roaming
charges by the regulators in Asia.


Raqueeb Hassan
Bangladesh

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:17:02 -0400


<Tim Korte>; "AP" <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.314.5@telecom-digest.org:

> By TIM KORTE, Associated Press Writer

> The widow of the astronomer who discovered Pluto 76 years ago said
> Thursday she was frustrated by the decision to strip it of its
> planetary status, but she added that Clyde Tombaugh would have
> understood.

Yes ... It should have been evident, almost as soon as Pluto was
discovered, that it was not the Planet X predicted by Percival Lowell
(who left funds to continue the search, leading to Tombaugh's
discovery).  Pluto is much smaller than a planet in the
Jupiter-Saturn-Uranus-Neptune sequence should have been.

I wonder if other Kuiper Belt objects could have been discovered from
the Lowell Observatory photographic plates if the search had
continued.  Presumably so.

With the change in nomenclature, Tombaugh becomes the discoverer of
the first Kuiper Belt object, which is arguably more important than
being discoverer of just one more planet.

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:52:07 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


[Default] Tim Korte, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org> said on that big
USENET thingie:

> The widow of the astronomer who discovered Pluto 76 years ago said
> Thursday she was frustrated by the decision to strip it of its
> planetary status, but she added that Clyde Tombaugh would have
> understood.

Some people have too much time on their hands ...

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:06:06 EDT
Subject: Re: Feds Just Can't Hack It


In a message dated Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:26:23 -0500, Daily News
Editorial <dailynews@telecom-digest.org> writes:

> By all indications, our nation's most sensitive data and computer
> systems have woefully poor protection against hackers, thieves and
> terrorists. 

       [ ...Remained deleted... ]

What "Daily News" is this?  There are many papers across the country
called "Daily News" and which one it is would appear to be a
significant factor in assessing the credibility of the story.

Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: It was the New York Daily News, of July
25 and the author was their columnist Errol Louis.  Sorry about that,
and I am reprinting it here below.  PAT]

Feds just can't hack it
 
By all indications, our nation's most sensitive data and computer
systems have woefully poor protection against hackers, thieves and
terrorists. Scandal could turn into national tragedy if the Department
of Homeland Security doesn't get its act together pronto.  It has been
more than a year since Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff
promised to name an assistant secretary devoted to cyberspace security
 -- but the job remains unfilled. There are few takers for the job --
in fact, three cybersecurity officials resigned -- because the White
House decided to put the chief of information security in a
low-ranking slot, without daily access to Chertoff.

This bureaucratic foolishness and paralysis comes more than three
years after the White House published a 60-page National Strategy to
Secure Cyberspace, which noted that "in the past few years, threats in
cyberspace have risen dramatically ... We must act to reduce our
vulnerabilities to these threats before they can be exploited."

Computers and the Internet are used to control and coordinate
airports, radio stations, electric utilities and radio communications
between first responders. Imagine how much worse the panic and death
toll on 9/11 might have been if New York were left without electric
power, without access to computers and without working phones, radio,
television or traffic lights.

A cyberattack could plunge all or part of the nation into chaos.

Still, federal bureaucrats have their heads stuck in the sand. In May,
red-faced officials at the Veterans Affairs Department acknowledged
that sensitive personal information on more than 26 million veterans -
including names, addresses and Social Security numbers - had gone
missing. The data wasn't lifted by hackers: it was stored, uncoded, on
a computer taken home by a government official whose last security
background check took place 32 years ago.

It gets worse.

The head of the VA acknowledged he wasn't even informed of the data
theft until two weeks after the fact. And while the computer
eventually turned up with no harm done, Pedro Cadenas, the agency's
cybersecurity chief, quit -- telling Government Executive magazine that
"the department has no interest in doing the right thing," and that
he'd only met the Veterans Affairs secretary once, at a social event.

The laxity of the Veterans Affairs Department isn't an isolated case; 
several federal departments -- including Defense and Homeland Security -- 
have received a grade of F for the past few years on a Computer Security 
Report Card issued by Congress. The government's overall grade is D-plus.

Every day, according to a recent report in The Washington Post, hackers 
make more than 2,000 attempts to crack the Department of Agriculture's 
computers -- and apparently succeeded a few weeks ago, leading the agency 
to announce that personal data on more than 26,000 contractors and 
active and retired employees may have been stolen.

Last year, an unknown intruder got into a computer at the National
Nuclear Security Administration, a division of the Department of
Energy that monitors the safety and reliability of military nuclear
weapons.  Information on more than 1,500 agency workers and outside
contractors was stolen. Incredibly, the security breach wasn't
reported to senior officials; it was buried with more than 830 other
incidents the agency experienced last year. Hiding such breaches is
common, according to government auditors.

Years before the 9/11 terrorist attack and the destruction of New
Orleans, federal officials were warned about grave danger, and did too
little to prepare for it.

Chertoff has got to do better -- before it gets worse.

Originally published in NY Daily News on July 25, 2006.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, 

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #315
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Aug 28 17:34:28 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 29E2821FA; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #316
Message-Id: <20060828213427.29E2821FA@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:36:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 316

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Google Wins e-Bay non-USA Ads  (Eric Auchard)
    Google Expands From Search and Advertising to Business Software (Auchard)
    Call for Papers: IAENG International Conference on Bioinformatics (ICB)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 28, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    EchoStar to Pay $100M in Retransmission Dispute (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs (Michael D. Sullivan)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Rick Merrill)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNO (John Levine)
    Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Feds Just Can't Hack It (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Poor Walmart Had Troubles Friday Night (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:46:25 -0500
From: Eric Auchard <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Google Wins e-Bay non-USA Ads 


By Eric Auchard

Web search leader Google Inc. will supply online auctioneer eBay Inc.
with Web search advertising outside the United States, and the two
will join forces on "click-to-call" ads that link online shoppers to
vendors, the companies said on Monday.

Paid search advertising lets marketers bid for ad space next to
keyword search results.

EBay, whose shares were up 3 percent, said that for international
online text advertising, it will rely exclusively on Google instead of
Yahoo Inc. which in May struck a parallel deal to handle eBay's
U.S. ads.

The eBay contract is part of a string of deals for Google this
month. It also plans to begin testing an ad-supported Web video
syndication system with Viacom Inc.'s MTV Networks, and it has struck
a deal to supply ads to MySpace users and other Web properties of News
Corp.

The deal with eBay "is the most important of these areas," Google
Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said in a phone interview.

"You can now see Google's strategy in each of these new markets,"
Schmidt said of MTV Web video, the MySpace community, and eBay
e-commerce partnerships. "These are very large businesses for us."

Separately, on Sunday, Google said it was moving beyond search and
advertising into the business software market, starting with a set of
Web programs for e-mail, scheduling and communications. It plans to
add additional programs later.

The eBay partnership indicates that "Google continues to grow not only
through rapid innovation, but also through partnerships with premier
online properties," Oppenheimer & Co. analyst A. Sasa Zorovic wrote in
a research note.

Financial terms for components of the deal involve revenue-sharing,
but the companies did not disclose details.

EBay said it did not expect the agreement to have a material impact on
its financial results in 2006 or 2007. Analysts said the deal was also
unlikely to have a material impact on Google during that period.

EBay increasingly depends on paid search advertising to drive bidders
to its auctions and sales. Its new pacts seek to make it easier for
buyers to search for items for sale on eBay, while being careful not
to offend sellers with competing ads.

Through its deal with Yahoo, eBay has already begun testing ads that
appear when U.S. customers fail to locate what they want on an eBay
auction search, eBay CEO Meg Whitman said.

The Google pact expands this to international sites.

If and when eBay sellers become more comfortable seeing ads alongside
their listings, eBay plans to expand the number of pages where Yahoo
or Google ads may appear, she said.

PHONING WEB CUSTOMER SERVICE

The companies said they will jointly offer "click-to-call" advertising
using the instant message and Web phone-calling services of two
companies -- eBay's globally popular Skype and Google's nascent Google
Talk service.

Click-to-call is where advertising merges into e-commerce. It allows
potential buyers to click on Web-phone ad links and talk directly to
sellers or their representatives.

The technique is seen as a promising way to reach merchants or
advertisers who may not have a Web site, or who rely on potential
customers using Yellow Pages phone directories.

"The vast majority of businesses still serve customers via the phone,"
Whitman said in a joint interview with Google's CEO. "This is the
online equivalent."

EBay has signed up more than 100 million users worldwide for its Skype
message and Web phone-calling service.

EBay said it would soon offer Skype users the option to download the
Google Toolbar, which has quick links to Google services, especially
Web search. The two will explore making Skype and Google Talk work
together for text chats and to help make users aware when users of the
other service are online.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:51:36 -0500
From: Eric Auchard <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Google Expands From Search and Advertising Into Business Software


By Eric Auchard
 
Google Inc. is making a concerted move beyond search and advertising 
into the business software market, starting with a set of Web programs 
for e-mail, scheduling and communications, it said on Sunday.

The online search leader said it has created a software platform to run 
basic business activities -- based on programs it already offers 
separately. The move marks a stepped up challenge to rival Microsoft 
Corp. as the software giant prepares to upgrade its Windows and Office 
franchises.

The free set of Web-based programs for small businesses, universities 
and nonprofit businesses goes by the mouthful "Google Apps for Your 
Domain" (http://www.google.com/a).

Later this year, Google said it will offer a "paid, premium" version 
with the option of being ad-free and more administrative control and 
compliance features to meet the demands of bigger corporations and 
government agencies. Pricing for this more advanced version is not yet 
available, it said.

Google will host the applications relieving companies of the need to 
maintain or install software on individual PCs -- support tasks often 
more costly than software itself.

"If we do it right, we get the best of both worlds -- very 
consumer-friendly software, but also low-cost business applications," 
said Dave Girouard, general manager of Google's enterprise division, 
which sells search software to companies.

Individual office workers can sign on to Google Apps -- short for 
applications -- through their Web browsers.

Initial apps are Gmail Web e-mail, the Google Talk instant message and
Web phone-calling service, group scheduling on Google Calendar, and
Google Page Creator for Web page design.

"It really is intended to be a platform," Girouard said.

"One of the fundamental benefits of the software as service approach
is that you can just turn on new features over time." The Writely word
processor and Google Spreadsheet are candidates for future inclusion
in Google Apps, Girouard said.

SOFTWARE CHALLENGE

Google's main appeal is to consumers of its popular Web search and
advertising systems. By packaging a set of software for businesses,
Google is responding to demands by corporate network administrators
who prefer to manage a standard set of software inside
organizations. Many are cracking down on the spread of individual
consumer programs within their networks.

Sue Feldman, an analyst with market research firm IDC, said Google
Apps moves the company into open competition with Microsoft in the
business software market.

Anticipating Google's moves, the world's biggest software maker has
responded with Windows "Live" -- Web-based software for small business
and consumers. But Microsoft's unwillingness to deliver its software
until it is "fully baked" gives Google an opening to win adherents to
its approach, the analyst said.

"There is simplicity and there is s-i-m-p-l-i-c-i-t-y," Feldman said.
"If you are used to using Microsoft Outlook, you may need many more
features and you will want to use them whether you are connected to
the Internet or offline."

Martin Pyykkonen, an analyst with Global Crown Capital of San
Francisco, says Google's bid to host business software may give pause
to companies mulling when to upgrade to new versions of Microsoft
Windows, Office and Outlook due in the next year.

"For all the complexity of Microsoft software and how long Vista has 
taken, a lot of corporate executives are going to be wary: Do you update 
to the complexity of Vista or would you be better off just using 
something simple like Google Apps?" he said.

Vista, the first major upgrade of Windows in five years, is due out 
later this year or early next.

IBM, Oracle Corp. and SAP AG also are racing to offer their software
as Web-based services in order to make it easier to use and to cut
costs, following the lead of pioneer Salesforce.com. Google's latest
move makes them both competitors and potential partners.

Girouard underscored that the Google Apps platform is not designed to 
replace Microsoft's core software. Many businesses are likely to run 
Windows and Office programs alongside Google Apps on office workers' 
computers, he said.

"This platform isn't by any means an alternative to Windows," Girouard 
said. "We are not really out there to eliminate any applications. We are 
looking to introduce new ways to solve problems people have been having 
for years."

"There is a lot of open territory," he said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news.html

------------------------------

From: imecs___2007@iaeng.org
Subject: Call for Papers: IAENG International Conference on Bioinformatics
Date: 27 Aug 2006 23:19:56 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


CFP: The IAENG International Conference on Bioinformatics ICB 2007
From: International Association of Engineers

The 2007 IAENG International Conference on Bioinformatics
21-23 March, 2007, Hong Kong
http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2007/ICB2007.html

The conference ICB'07 is held under the International MultiConference
of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2007. The IMECS 2007 is organized
by the International Association of Engineers (IAENG), and serves as
good platforms for the engineering community members to meet with each
other and to exchange ideas. The last conference in 2006 has attracted
a total of over four hundred participants from over 30 countries.

All submitted papers will be under peer review and accepted papers
will be published in the conference proceeding (ISBN:
978-988-98671-4-0).  The abstracts will be indexed and available at
major academic databases. The accepted papers will also be considered
for publication in the special issues of the journal Engineering
Letters, in IAENG journals and in edited books.

Important Dates:

Draft Manuscript submission deadline: 12 December, 2006
Camera-Ready papers & Pre-registration due: 2 January, 2007
ICB 2007: 21-23 March, 2007

Submission:

ICB 2007 is now accepting manuscript submissions. Prospective authors
are invited to submit their draft paper in full paper (any appropriate
style) to imecs{at}iaeng.org by 12 December, 2006. The submitted file
can be in MS Word format, PS format, or PDF formats.

The first page of the draft paper should include:
(1) Title of the paper;
(2) Name, affiliation and e-mail address for each author;
(3) A maximum of 5 keywords of the paper.
Also, the name of the conference that the paper is being submitted to
should be stated in the email.

The topics of the ICB'07 include, but not limited to, the following:

Sequence analysis
Sequence alignment
Sequence database
Sequence profiling tools
Sequence motif
Genome annotation
Gene finding
Computational evolutionary biology
Gene expression analysis
Protein expression analysis
Analysis of mutations in cancer and other diseases
Structure prediction
Structural motif
Preserving biodiversity
Modeling biological systems
Software tools
And other applications

ICB Conference Co-Chairs and Committee Members:

Dr. Qingfeng Chen (co-chair)
School of Information Technology
Deakin University, Australia

I-Jen Chiang
Associate Professor, Graduate Institute of Medical Informatics,
Taipei Medical University
Adjunct Associate Professor, Graduate Institute of Biomedical
Engineering,
National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Wallace Choy (co-chair)
Research Ass. Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronic
Engineering
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Jui-chien Hsieh (co-chair)
Assistant Professor, Department of Bioinformatics
Chung Hua University, Taiwan

Hsueh-Fen Juan
Assistant Professor, Department of Life science
National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Xueliang Li
Deputy Director and Professor
Center for Combinatorics, Nankai University, China

Alejandro Murua (co-chair)
Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Montreal, Canada
Associate Editor, International Journal of Tomography and Statistics

Dr. Dat Tran
Senior Lecturer in Computing, School of Information Sciences and
Engineering,
University of Canberra, Australia

Lin-Yu Tseng (co-chair)
Professor, Department of Computer Science
National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

Jer-Shyan Wu (co-chair)
Associate Professor, Department of Bioinformatics
Chung Hua University, Taiwan

Cheng-Hong Yang
Professor, Department of Electronics Engineering,
National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Taiwan

More details about the IMECS 2007 can be found at:
http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2007/index.html

More details about the International Association of Engineers, the
journal Engineering Letters and the IAENG International Journal of
Computer Science can be found at:
http://www.iaeng.org/about_IAENG.html
http://www.engineeringletters.com
http://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/index.html

It will be highly appreciated if you can circulate these calls for
papers to your colleagues.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 28, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:49:23 -0400 (EDT)


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 28, 2006
********************************

Motorola and Nokia Experience Problems in Russia
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19555?11228

     Motorola said last week that it would not seek compensation for
     the destruction of mobile phones worth US$2 million. In March
     this year, 167,000 Motorola mobile phones (worth about US$17
     million) were impounded by police at a Moscow airport as evidence
     in a contraband case. In April, police charged that the phones
     posed a danger to ...

One-Touch Keypad Finds a Home
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19551?11228

     As everybody knows, most alphanumeric keyboards designed for
     mobile devices are little more than a cruel joke. Tiny keytops
     and cramped layouts make any attempt at rapid, long-term typing
     frustrating and potentially painful.  Back in 2002, Lexington,
     Mass.-based Digit Wireless unveiled its FasTap keypad. The device
     was designed to ...

Sprint Aims to Simplify Business Mobility
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19549?11228

     Sprint Nextel introduced Sprint Advanced Wireless Solutions, a
     program designed to provide business customers with an
     all-inclusive mobility solution. Sprint intends to act as the
     single point of contact for its business customers, while
     handling contract negotiations, and solution configuration and
     integration for its customers.  ...

Frontier/Citizens Seek Broadband Deregulation
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19547?11228

     The incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) operations of
     Frontier and its parent Citizens Communications have asked the
     federal government to free their broadband businesses from rules
     and regulations the latest chapter of what is becoming a growing
     trend among major U.S. telcos: Seeking light-touch treatment.
     Forbearance petitions ...

Laptop vs Smartphone: No Contest
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19545?11228

     Executives at smartphone manufacturers like Palm Inc. and
     Research In Motion Ltd. (RIM) need only look at their own
     products to understand why, even as the devices gain popularity
     across different job functions and levels, the penetration among
     all mobile workers remains a fraction of the total potential user
     base ...

Nokia Siemens Names More Execs
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19543?11228

     Nokia Corp. and Siemens Communications Group have ironed out
     more details of their carrier infrastructure joint venture, Nokia
     Siemens Networks, naming the heads of its business and regional
     divisions. The new company will combine Nokia's Networks Business
     Group with the carrier-related operations of Siemens ...

Mobile Video Industry Will Begin to Shape up in 2008
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19541?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- The market for long form mobile/portable
     video content (video content of greater than 30 minutes) is
     currently in an experimental phase, and will likely remain at
     this stage for at least two years, reports In-Stat. By 2008,
     however, the industry will begin to gain traction and demonstrate
     its long-term ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:40:57 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: EchoStar to Pay $100M in Retransmission Dispute


USTelecom dailyLead
August 28, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/enpwfDtusXbkdhUVbp

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* EchoStar to pay $100M in retransmission dispute
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Wireless carriers fend off rivals in spectrum auction
* Telstra to offer stock deal to current shareholders
* XO gets into wireless broadband mix
* Analysis: Microsoft's unified communications plan could face hurdles
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance, Telco IPTV & ROADM -- Now Free On-Demand
HOT TOPICS
* Cisco buys Arroyo
* AT&T inks U-Verse deal in San Antonio
* Analysis: Sprint Nextel faces uphill climb
* Verizon, BellSouth to add new surcharge to DSL bills
* Supreme Court justice lets EchoStar ruling stand
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Mobile ads look to dial up consumers
* Google, eBay in global text-ad deal
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* BellSouth scraps DSL surcharge
* Editorial: California PUC vote a solid move
* Wireless carriers seek priority treatment to ensure speedy repairs during
  emergencies
DIVERSIONS
* In Transylvania, a Count Invites You to His Castle
* Read Between All Those For-Sale Signs
* Bargains Are Near; Just Keep Waiting
* In Paris, a Feast of Art and History, in Bite-Size Pieces
* Like Packards? Ask the Man Who Owns 33 of Them

------------------------------

From: Michael D. Sullivan <userid@camsul.example.invalid>
Subject: Re: Cellular Roaming Tariffs
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:11:07 GMT


On 8/27/2006 11:57 AM, Raqueeb Hassan wrote:

> Michael D. Sullivan wrote:

>> That is correct.  State PUCs are explicitly deprived of jurisdiction
>> to regulate cellular rates by Section 221(b)(3) of the Communications
>> Act, 47 USC 221(b)(3).  This is true of both the carrier-consumer
>> rates, such as the ones governed by various contracts that may charge
>> different rates from contract to contract, and of the
>> carrier-to-carrier rates, which are governed by roaming agreements
>> between carriers.

> Well, I guess that applies in US within, what happens in other part of
> the world? I'm interested on the inter-carrier cellular roaming
> charges by the regulators in Asia.

This is governed by national and, in some cases, sub-national laws.
My response above pertains only to the U.S.  Given the generally
deregulated nature of wireless services in most countries, the same
analysis may apply.  But there is no guarantee of that.  Only a
specialist qualified to analyze your country's laws and regulations
can answer your question on a country-specific basis.

Michael D. Sullivan
Bethesda, MD (USA)
(To reply, change example.invalid to com in the address.)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:03:18 -0400
From: Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP


ivan.filpo@gmail.com wrote:

> I am very anxious about transferring my local phone number to Vonage
> because I am worried that users that can call me for free now, will no
> longer be able to. I live in the border line of two area codes, 225
> and 985, I can call my friends 985 number locally, no long distance
> charge, with my 225 number. However, since the number that vonage
> temporatily assigned to me is considered long distance to this town, I
> am scared that even though my current phone is local it might become a
> distant number.

> According to what I have read about LNP, when porting numbers from one
> telco to another, you should remain in the same physical area; meaning
> that I should be able to still call my friends without the need to
> dial 1 and viceversa, as one would for long distance numbers. However,
> I do not want a mistake like porting my number from local to long
> distance to happen, and therefore, feel very anxious about this step
> and I am for confirmation that what I understood is right and that
> according to FCC rules it should remain local.

> Currently Vonage gave me a temporary phone line, but since I guess low
> requests in this area since most people dont have internet, they were
> not able to give me a local number, and therefore cant receive calls
> unless callers dial 1. However, something else tells me that by
> porting my current phone vonage will gain or have access to a phone
> line in this area and should keep it local, at least that is what
> common sense tells me, but just need to confirm since I cant afford to
> make this mistake.

> I understand that if exchanging local carriers the number should
> remain as local, but Vonage is over the internet and does not seem it
> would remain local, but it could with third party exchange carriers.

> Finally, should I be completely sure that my line will port and that
> will remain local?

> Thanks for reading and all your help.

> Ivan

YOU will have free LD, but you are correct that your friends calling
you might have to dial and pay LD rates.  I have heard from other folk
to whom this happened.

I would call Vonage support for your area and ask for a supervisor to 
explain exactly how it would work -- give them your friends phone number 
for an example.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: 28 Aug 2006 09:00:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


ivan.filpo@gmail.com wrote:

> I am very anxious about transferring my local phone number to Vonage
> because I am worried that users that can call me for free now, will no
> longer be able to. I live in the border line of two area codes, 225
> and 985, I can call my friends 985 number locally, no long distance
> charge, with my 225 number. However, since the number that vonage
> temporatily assigned to me is considered long distance to this town, I
> am scared that even though my current phone is local it might become a
> distant number.

Before I answer, you should know I am not a big fan of VOIP.  IMHO it
is overhyped and there are many technical details (like 911
connectivity) to be worked out.  IMHO (and personal experience) many
of the sales people often give out incorrect information and do not
have adequate resources to serve customers correctly.  Thus, you may
be promised something that doesn't come to be.

I also live in a border area as you describe and I have found
outsiders -- like long distance carriers -- do not understand the
arrangement.  Long distance companies have billed me for local calls
over the line and it was a fight to get the charges off.

I am afraid VOIP are spread too thin to understand these subtle
arrangements and your concerns are completely valid.  That is, you
will end up with a number that is long distance for others to call
you.

------------------------------

Date: 28 Aug 2006 21:18:30 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
In-Reply-To: <telecom25.315.2@telecom-digest.org>


> I am very anxious about transferring my local phone number to Vonage
> because I am worried that users that can call me for free now, will no
> longer be able to.

The rate that people pay to call your number depends ONLY on the rate
center your number's prefix (the first three digits) is assigned to.
Vonage may or may not be able to port your number, but if they can, it
won't affect who can call if for free.

> According to what I have read about LNP, when porting numbers from one
> telco to another, you should remain in the same physical area

What that really means is that the new telco must offer service in the
LATA to which the number is assigned.  LATAs are service areas that
were created at the time of the Bell breakup.  Sometimes they match
area code boundares, but more often they don't.

R's,

John

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision
Date: 28 Aug 2006 09:04:03 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


The story in the Newark Star Ledger reported that only a small number
of scientists actually voted in the official survey; that is, the
majority of scientists at the conference did not participate in the
vote.

That makes me wonder if the vote was fair.

While the scientific evidence to downgrade Pluto is strong, the
decision still bothers me none the less.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Feds Just Can't Hack It
Date: 28 Aug 2006 11:52:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Daily News Editorial wrote:

> Computers and the Internet are used to control and coordinate
> airports, radio stations, electric utilities and radio communications
> between first responders. Imagine how much worse the panic and death
> toll on 9/11 might have been if New York were left without electric
> power, without access to computers and without working phones, radio,
> television or traffic lights.
> A cyberattack could plunge all or part of the nation into chaos.

There IS cause for concern, but the risk varies greatly from one
application to another.

Also, "cyberattack" has many different meanings.  Much of it simply
could be a traditional physical attack on infrastructure, such as
putting an explosive down a utility manhole or blowing up a computer
room.  How much protection does critical power substations have
against being bombed?

Many networks are very vulnerable to viruses.  For example, an email
virus could cripple everyone's desk top with a flood of emails.  That
might have nothing to do with an application, but if one's desktop is
down, can one still control an application?  For critical control
points, such control units should be fully isolated except for their
dedicated function.  Operators shouldn't be emailing their girlfriends
or surfing the net from such computers.

Critical applications should not be controlled through the Internet at
all.  That is way too risky.  It's all right for an applicaton to use
Internet protocols within itself, but it should be completely isolated
from the Internet.  That is direct lines between control and the
field, with secondary backup lines.

> Still, federal bureaucrats have their heads stuck in the sand. In May,
> red-faced officials at the Veterans Affairs Department acknowledged that
> sensitive personal information on more than 26 million veterans --
> including names, addresses and Social Security numbers -- had gone
> missing.

This turned out to be much ado about nothing.  The laptop was stolen
for itself, not for the data on it.  I suspect almost all such thefts
are for the physical item, not the data.

(We do need far better controls on protecting information, though.)

In this day and age the existence of sabotage viruses and the like is
inexcusable.  The sabotage isn't by James Bond type figures climbing
down the skylight.  A great many people are skilled enough to make
viruses, they just choose not to.  The Internet should be far more
secure.  It's like using a bathroom door lock to protect the gold at
Fort Knox.

We'll probably need a national or international body to control the
Internet and eliminate the numerous weakspots in it, kind of like the
way the FCC and intl bodies allocate radio frequencies and telephone
signal protocols.  This business of hijacking unprotected servers is
ridiculous.

Although this is blasphemous to say so, we'll probably need border
controls on Internet traffic entering the United States just as there
is on physical goods.  Or quarentine borders around countries that
create malicious viruses, phishing, etc.

I still insist the term "virus" is very misleading.  It implies it's
something we can't really control very well, like the common cold.
But that's false.  It's sabotage, not naturally from nature, but
specifically created by people.  Maybe if the headlines read "ABC BANK
HIT BY SABOTAGE, 3RD ATTACK THIS WEEK" people would take notice and
demand action.

[public replies, please]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Poor Walmart Had Troubles Friday Night
Date: 28 Aug 2006 11:59:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor wrote:

> I lost close to a hundred dollars worth of
> refrigerator/freezer food during the eight hours I was without
> power. (7:30 PM to about 5:00 AM).

Some say food will last a good number of hours if the doors are not
opened.  I don't know what the cutoff time is.  Obviously it depends on
the insulation quality of the fridge and the room temperature.

> Walmart is going to stay closed over the weekend in order to restock
> all their frozen grocery items

My neighborhood power relability is not so good.  One local restaurant
got a generator and the police have a generator for the traffic light.
If storms are predicted, these generators are pulled out to be ready.

The local convenience store has to dump all its perishables which is a
lot of food (frozen and deli items of which it sells a lot).  Seems to
me they should get a generator for their frig/freezers to save their
stock.  Even if the store has to close due to no lights at least they
can reopen immediately when the lights come on.  However, the
generator needed for powering commercial grade and size freezers and
refrigerators may be very large and too big to be practical.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Now that the weekend is over and things
are back to at least a semblence of normalacy, we here (the Townson
household) have found have found that much of what we considered to be
'ruined' in fact unthawed a little but is mostly okay. I kept the
refrigerator/freezer doors closed entirely the entire night except
once for a jug of icewater and cola to drink. An informal audit taken
of some of the restaurant business places around town (such as Dairy
Queen where we ate Saturday night) said Friday night was a real
bummer, having to clean up/close up in the dark Friday night, but they
managed to get by. Microtel and Super Eight (two motels along that
West Main Street strip as well as Walmart are still trying to get
things back to normal as of today, Monday afternoon. All the
businesses along there now have generators, compliments of Westar
Energy. They even gave a couple generators to the handful of 
residences still affected out there, and told them all to _carefully_
ration the power among themslves. 

Walmart -- not to be outwitted -- has a couple of large, noisy
generators sitting in their parking lot, which is otherwise taken
over by Westar/KGE trucks and equipment. The main road into Walmart
has police cars with officers waving everyone away, so Walmart fixed
things up so if you wish to get into their store, there is a little
tiny road several yards west which terminates in their parking lot
(otherwise occupied by large, heavy, very specialized trucks and
other units, but Walmart kept about one row of spaces for their 
customers, which is being shared with Walmart's own freezer trucks 
and a mechanical fork lift truck which someone drives around getting
things out of the freezer trucks. Most of the store is still dark;
the generators cannot light the entire place as Walmart would like,
and although they say they are 'open for business' when we went by
there this morning, 'business' amounted to perhaps two or three
customers around some taped off registers and most of the store
sort of a gray color from the skylights which were letting in sun
light and the few overhead lights the generators were able to deal
with in addition to serving the computers, the phone system and the
freezers. 

Who I really feel sorry for out there is Dr. Epp and his veternary
clinic/hospital. The poor animals must have really suffered in the
heat over the weekend, although I saw a generator parked in _his_
parking area this morning; but a sign said 'kennel is closed at this
time, elective surgery (i.e. getting your dogs and cats 'fixed') is
cancelled, please re-schedule; emergencies only at this time. And the
local animal shelter is a couple blocks away. They are also categorized
as a 'business' which put them sort of low on the totem-pole of the
Westar emergency repairs. :(  Over here on the east side of town, we
sit here in relative ease and comfort today. PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #316
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Aug 29 14:50:49 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 307A8220B; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #317
Message-Id: <20060829185048.307A8220B@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:52:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 317

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    FCC Speeds Up Bidding in Wireless Sale (Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 29, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    EPIC Alert 13.13 (Monty Solomon)
    EPIC Alert 13.14 (Monty Solomon)
    EPIC Alert 13.15 (Monty Solomon)
    EPIC Alert 13.16 (Monty Solomon)
    EPIC Alert 13.17 (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (John Hines)
    May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units From Toll (L Hancock)
    Developer to Raze Bell Labs Holmdel Facility (Neal McLain)
    Ever Want to Throw Away Your Mobile Phone? (Anna Ringstrom, Reuters)
    Verizon Offers Free Online Games (USTA DailyLead)    
    NY Times Reporter Seeks Info on History of SIT Tone (davidk) 

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:45:30 -0500
From: Jeremy Pelofsky <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: FCC Speeds Up Bidding in Wireless Sale


By Jeremy Pelofsky

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday accelerated the
bidding in its auction of licenses for advanced wireless services,
which has already raised almost $13.6 billion after 14 days.

The agency added two rounds of bidding per day to bring the daily
total to six rounds and cut the time of each round in half to 30
minutes, an effort to complete the sale as companies vie for 1,122
licenses around the country.

The auction continues until there are no new bids, withdrawals or
other activity.

After 54 rounds, T-Mobile USA, the No. 4 U.S. wireless carrier and a
unit of Germany's Deutsche Telekom AG, provisionally had the highest
bids for 121 licenses with offers of $4.2 billion.

Analysts predicted the company would be an aggressive bidder because
it does not have as many airwaves as its larger competitors. T-Mobile
has the highest bids for several large regional licenses as well as
ones that cover smaller areas.

No. 2 wireless carrier Verizon Wireless is second in the bidding, with
provisionally winning bids of $2.8 billion for four licenses.

While traditional wireless companies have largely dominated the
auction, a group that includes the major cable television providers
and No. 3 wireless carrier Sprint Nextel Corp. is in third place based
on provisionally winning bids.

That group, SpectrumCo LLC, includes Comcast Corp., Time Warner
Inc. and Cox Communications and has the highest bids for 133 licenses
with offers of almost $2.3 billion, according to FCC data.

Analysts have predicted the sale could raise up to $15 billion, which
would be a record if there are no successful legal challenges or
bidders that failed to pay.

The FCC did raise $17.6 billion in a 2001 auction, but that sale was
later voided when the Supreme Court ruled the licenses up for auction
were wrongfully taken from a company in bankruptcy protection.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 29, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:45:26 EDT



********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 29, 2006
********************************

EU Study Reveals Need for More Competition, Finds Mobile Households
Exceed Fixed 
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/105/19584?11228

     The European Commission's efforts at forcing incumbent telecoms
     operators to open up their infrastructures to competition
     received a boost last week. A new study released on Friday (25
     August) found that greater competition and streamlined European
     rules encouraged greater investment and ...

FCC, Wireless Industry Unhappy with New FAA Directive
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19582?11228

     The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the wireless
     industry have criticised a new directive from the Federal
     Aviation Administration (FAA) to introduce more checks when
     companies site new antennas or make modifications to existing
     ones. The FAA had in June proposed plans to modify and expand the
     scope of its Part 77 rules ...

Uncovering Revenue Leakage Problems in Broadband and Data Services
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19577?11228

     Given today's tight margins and competitive landscape, most
     providers now understand that revenue assurance needs to be a
     proactive element of every service rollout. In this article, we
     will look at a configuration-based approach to fighting revenue
     leakage in flat-fee services that are delivered over
     packet-switched ...

Get Real with Wireless Price Points
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19574?11228

     Unless they come to the party with deep pockets, the major
     winners in the AWS auctions that begin next month will have to
     secure financing for network buildouts.  Companies with big plans
     for WiMAX operations are faced with the same challenge. To be
     successful, they will need to convince investors with business
     models that show they ...

Tests and Tools Heed the VoIP Call
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19572?11228

     While VoIP (voice-over-IP) service reaches deeper into millions
     of homes and businesses, and its place in the triple play bundle
     rises to near-must-have proportions, the testing of the
     service's tricky nuances and complexities is entering the
     mission-critical stage.  For the most part, the status of VoIP
     testing is at best a work ...

MobilePro Helps RCN Make a Quadruple Play
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19568?11228

     RCN Corporation and MobilePro forged an agreement to sell
     wireless services, which will enable RCN to become a
     quadruple-play provider.  The deal marks the first time wireless
     will be offered to RCN customers. The companies plan to work
     together to roll out an initial trial in September, offering a
     range of monthly plans aimed at ...

Rumor Du Jour: France Telecom Could Enter PT Fight
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19565?11228

     With Portugal's Competition Authority (AdC) now expected to rule
     by the end of the week favorably -- albeit with major stipulations --
     on Sonae&#39;s hostile takeover bid for Portugal Telecom (PT), rumors
     out of Europe say France Telecom is about to step into the fray and
     will, together with a clutch of Spanish banks, help fund more...

WiFi Gets High
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19562?11228

     As questions continue to arise about large-scale mesh WiFi
     deployments in big cities, the technoscenti have begun to ask: Is
     there a better way? The answer is yes, according to Jerry Dix,
     chairman and CEO of 5G Wireless Communications Inc., which
     supplies 'cellular-style' WiFi for outdoor and indoor networks.
     ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:23:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EPIC Alert 13.13


========================================================================
                           E P I C  A l e r t
========================================================================
Volume 13.13                                               June 30, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Published by the
               Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                            Washington, D.C.

             http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.13.html

========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Government Program Probes Financial Records
[2] EPIC Opposes Photo ID Requirements for Voting
[3] Lawmakers, Industry, Call for Federal Privacy Law
[4] FTC Calls for Open Access to WHOIS
[5] Experts Find Wiretaps Weaken Security
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC Bookstore: Vernor Vinge's "Rainbows End"
[8] Upcoming Conferences and Events

http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.13.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:23:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EPIC Alert 13.14


========================================================================
                           E P I C  A l e r t
========================================================================
Volume 13.14                                               July 13, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Published by the
               Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                            Washington, D.C.

             http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.14.html

========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Georgia State, Federal Courts Halt Photo ID Requirement for Voters
[2] EPIC Supports Supreme Court Review of DNA Databases
[3] British ID Card Plan Stalls
[4] FBI Proposes Wiretap Law Expansion
[5] Defense Department Monitored Student Email
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC Bookstore: John Battelle's "The Search"
[8] Upcoming Conferences and Events

http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.14.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:23:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EPIC Alert 13.15


========================================================================
                           E P I C  A l e r t
========================================================================
Volume 13.15                                               July 27, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Published by the
               Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                            Washington, D.C.

             http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.15.html

========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Courts, Congress Ponder NSA Surveillance Issues
[2] EPIC Testifies on WHOIS Privacy and Phishing
[3] House Committees Hold Joint Hearing on E-voting
[4] House Nears Vote on Data Breach Bill
[5] D.C. Council Approves Temporary Expansion of Camera Use
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC Bookstore: Yochai Benkler's "The Wealth of Networks"
[8] Upcoming Conferences and Events

http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.15.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:23:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EPIC Alert 13.16


========================================================================
                           E P I C  A l e r t
========================================================================
Volume 13.16                                             August 10, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Published by the
               Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                            Washington, D.C.

             http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.16.html

========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Key Congressman Doubts DHS Privacy Officer's Qualifications
[2] Non Commercial Users Urge Privacy for WHOIS before IGF
[3] $50 Million Verdict for Violating Drivers' Privacy in FL
[4] GAO: Current Laws Don't Protect Info Held by Data Brokers
[5] RFID Passport Hacked
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC Bookstore: Steve Posner, "Privacy Law and the USA PATRIOT Act"
[8] Upcoming Conferences and Events


http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.16.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:23:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EPIC Alert 13.17


========================================================================
                           E P I C  A l e r t
========================================================================
Volume 13.17                                             August 25, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Published by the
               Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
                            Washington, D.C.

             http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.17.html

========================================================================
Table of Contents
========================================================================
[1] Federal Court Finds NSA Wiretaps Illegal
[2] AOL Releases Users' Search Queries
[3] DHS Inspector General: More Security Needed for RFID
[4] Government to Require Cars Warn of "Black Box" Recording
[5] DHS Seeks Expanded Access to Travelers' Data
[6] News in Brief
[7] EPIC Bookstore: David Lazer's "DNA and the Criminal Justice System"
[8] Upcoming Conferences and Events


http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_13.17.html

------------------------------

From: John Hines <jbhines@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:26:01 -0500
Organization: www.jhines.org
Reply-To: john@jhines.org


> Editor's Note: When our power came back on Saturday morning, the
> Independence High School cable TV station had a program on
> interviewing one of the astronomy teachers who noted that "all the
> textbooks we have used in my memory have included Pluto as one of
> 'our' planets. (Flashback showing a classroom scene, with a textbook
> open to pages discussing Pluto.) I guess new textbooks will revise
> all that."

One of the reasons why IMHO they should have grandfathered Pluto in as
a planet.

Now if the Walt Disney Co would do a short showing Pluto(c) as the
leader of the Knuiper band of objects, we could teach the solar system
in 3 to 5 minutes. <G>

Silly sig to prevent isp ad

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units From Toll
Date: 28 Aug 2006 14:46:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


May 1966 -- NYT -- Suffolk County Long Island telephone subscribers were
angry at a change in billing practices.  NY Telephone switched to a
message unit system instead of itemized toll charges for calls outside
one's calling area on Long Island.

With "message units", the bill only shows a gross number of units
rather than individually itemized calls.  The units charged per call
vary by distance and time.

Business people said they needed itemization for tax purposes.

Others complained they had large bills but no way to figure them out.

The phone company said the switch saved customers 20% in bookkeeping
costs.  From the phone company's point of view, it is much simpler
than listing on a bll a slew of 5c and 10c toll calls.

The above refers to Suffolk County on suburban Long Island (still
mostly rural in 1966).  The rest of NYC and adjacent suburbs went to
message units -- along with direct dialing -- around 1950.

I don't know how the phone company recorded charges back then.
According to the Eng & Sci history, AMA tapes included message unit
calls, so detailed records were available even if not shown on the
customer's bill.  But message units could also be easily recorded on
the same meters used to track local calls, just incrementing the
counter as needed per call.  AMA was developed with No 5 crossbar in
1948 so it was theorectically available for NY.

Could anyone elaborate on this process?

Message units or measured service is still used today in places.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:54:58 -0500
From: Neal McLain <nmclain@annsgarden.com>
Subject: Developer to Raze Bell Labs Holmdel Facility


Developer to raze Bell Labs Holmdel facility, birthplace of the
cellphone.

Engadget July 5, 2006

The facility in question, one time Holmdel, New Jersey home to Bell
Labs -- one of the most prolific technology innovators of the 20th
century -- was owned by Lucent technologies until a recent round of
asset liquidations. Barely 40 miles out of New York City, in its
heydey the six-story, two million square foot campus, employed over
5,600 people who toiled away in its bowels; it became home to the work
of numerous Nobel laureates, and has long since been cemented in the
annals of tech history as the birthplace to some of the most important
communications technologies ever conceived. And it'll soon be torn
down.

Full article: http://tinyurl.com/pm2wo

Back in my college days in Ann Arbor in the '60s, I once wrote a term 
paper about Eero Saarinen, the architect.  Here are links to two 
publicity photos that the Bell Labs PR folks sent to me at the time:
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b85/Cable77422/3.jpg
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b85/Cable77422/2.jpg

I've been told that the water tower is supposed to look like a 
transistor, but I think that's sort of stretching the imagination...

Neal McLain

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:00:32 -0500
From: Anna Ringstrom, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Ever Want to Throw Away Your Mobile Phone?


Finn takes gold at mobile phone throwing contest 
By Anna Ringstrom

Anyone wanting to throw away their mobile phone can do it in style and
may even win a medal -- at the Mobile Phone Throwing World
Championship, Finland's latest contribution to offbeat athleticism.

Originally a local event in this small town close to the Russian
border, the seventh annual contest on Saturday, August 26, drew some
100 throwers from as far afield as Canada, Russia and Belgium.

Founder Christine Lund describes the event as a good source of light
exercise with an environmentally friendly twist. "There are a lot of
mobile phones on the second-hand market, and we are recycling them
(before they become toxic waste)," she said.

The inventive Finns had already given the world the Sauna World
Championships and the Wife Carrying Competition before coming up with
a new way to make mobile phones even more mobile.

This year's gold medal went to Finland's Lassi Etelatalo, who flung a
scrapped Nokia unit a forceful 89.00 metres. "I prepared by javelin
throwing, I haven't really practised throwing mobile phones,"
Etelatalo told Reuters.

In the freestyle event, Dutchman Elie Rugthoven's phone landed outside
the designated area, but he still won silver thanks to a phone
juggling performance that impressed the judges.

Lund says competitors all have their favorite throwing brand. "People
choose by size, by color or by how it fits in the hand ... Some
believe a heavy model will ensure a long throw, some want a light
one."


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:08:15 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Verizon Offers Free Online Games


USTelecom dailyLead
August 29, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/enzQfDtusXbnaSTfwJ

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Verizon offers free online games
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* AOL relaunches music product
* Verizon expands Microsoft alliance
* Skype a key factor in eBay-Google alliance
* Teens may not want their MTV online
* Report: IPTV could reach 34M subscribers worldwide by 2010
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* What you need to know about IPTV
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Wi-Fi Alliance to certify "Draft N" products
* The coming mobile Web
* Australia's developers sweeten housing deals with fiber-optic offers
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Report: Maine trails U.S. in broadband subscriptions
DIVERSIONS
* That Final Resting Place, Reimagined
* BMW's Custom-Made University
* The Original Bali Hai
* Kander Without Ebb? Start Spreading the News
* Find the Soul of Love and Paris. You Have Five Minutes. Go!

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/enzQfDtusXbnaSTfwJ

------------------------------

From: davidk <davidkocieniewski@verizon.net>
Subject: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone
Date: 29 Aug 2006 11:25:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


My name is David Kocieniewski, I'm a New York Times reporter
researching a story about the development and history of the special
information tone.

If anyone has any info about this topic, please contact me at my office
(609) 292-5174 or by email : davidk@nytimes.com (please cc to
davidkocieniewski@verizon.net because the Times' voracious spam filter
sometimes gobbles up friend as well as foe) 

Thanks.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #317
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Aug 31 14:49:01 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id A460921B9; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:49:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #318
Message-Id: <20060831184900.A460921B9@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:49:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:50:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 318

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    AT&T Inks Wi-Fi Deal With Illinois City (USTelecom dailyLead)
    California Senate Approves Statewide Franchise Bell (USTelecom dailylead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 30, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 31, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Research on History of Automated Operator Services (AOS) (Denise C)
    Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Sam Spade)
    Re: Ever Want to Throw Away Your Mobile Phone? (Matt Simpson)
    Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Units From Toll (D Burstein)
    Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units (Sam Spade)
    Re: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone (L. Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:26:11 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: AT&T Inks Wi-Fi Deal With Illinois City


USTelecom dailyLead
August 30, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eojwfDtusXbqqXAYqt

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* AT&T inks Wi-Fi deal with Illinois city
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* DirecTV venture plans VoIP test
* With an eye on future, Samsung plans 4G demonstration
* Bids for AOL's German Internet access biz said to top $766M
* AT&T reports security breach
* ESPN Mobile to show full-length college football games
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Creating International Networks to Support Your ExpansionTuesday, Sept. 1=
2, 1:00 p.m. ET
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Spike TV puts content online
* Universal singing new-media tune with free downloads
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC takes steps to accelerate spectrum auction
DIVERSIONS
* What I Drank on My Summer Vacation
* Tripoli: Once a Pariah, Now a Hot Spot
* A Watchdog Group Warns Against AOL's Free Software
* Forget Legroom. What About More Water?
* The Kings of the Cocktail Hour Once Again

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eojwfDtusXbqqXAYqt


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:04:14 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead  <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: California Senate Approves Statewide Franchise Bill


USTelecom dailyLead
August 31, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eosUfDtusXbvpdaNoO

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* California Senate approves statewide franchise bill
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Verizon ends DSL surcharge
* Clearwire goes live on Hawaiian island of Oahu
* Details emerge about Mobile ESPN's college football plan
* Google to TV industry: We can be friends
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* USTelecom can help you reach telecom decision-makers
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Startup to allow viewers to get U.S. TV anywhere
* Renting movies still easier than downloading them
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Illinois lifts price caps imposed on AT&T
* Ireland's Ryanair to allow in-flight mobile phone use
* California bill would require Wi-Fi security warnings on products
DIVERSIONS
* 36 Hours: South Beach, Fla.
* The Many Faces of You (Clean Up With a Click)
* Turning 60, and Checking Their Calculators
* Drivers, Not Golfers, On the 18th Fairway
* Just How Popular Is That Baby Name?

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eosUfDtusXbvpdaNoO

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 30, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:04:19 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 30, 2006
********************************

Componentizing Operations: A Critical Precursor for IMS
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19610?11228

     For nearly a decade, the OSS value proposition was built on
     efficiency, cost savings and time to market. But in a world
     dominated by circuit-switched voice revenue, the idea of
     integrating OSSs-and going through nightmarish data normalization
     and modeling exercises-wasn't all that appealing. What's
     different today, given IMS and ...

Sigma to Gain Further 25% in SMARTS
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19609?11228

     Regional mobile operator SMARTS has been dealt another blow in
     its battle with investment company Sigma. Sigma has obtained the
     right to a further 25% stake in the operator, according to
     Prime-Tass, citing Kommersant. This situation has arisen because
     of the failure of SMARTS general director, and major shareholder,
     Gennady Kiryushin to ...

Sonaecom Mulls Revised Portugal Telecom Bid
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19606?11228

     Portugal's Sonaecom is lining up France Telecom and
     Soci&eacute;t&eacute; G&eacute;n&eacute;rale Bank to finance an
     improved bid for Portugal Telecom, according to Dow Jones reports
     citing sources close to the situation. Sonaecom had launched an
     unsolicited US$12.8-billion bid for Portugal Telecom in February, a
     company more than ...

Verizon Launches Gaming Portal
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19603?11228

     Verizon has announced the launch of PlayLinc, a serious effort to
     get online gamers interactive using Verizon's platforms. PlayLinc
     is showcased in a new community Web site, games.verizon.com, and
     according to the company 'consolidates voice, instant messaging,
     game management, and other tools into one easy-to-use ...

On-the-Go Video Surveillance
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19600?11228

     Most video surveillance networks are fixed systems, with cameras
     and network gear permanently mounted to walls, buildings,
     lampposts and other permanent fixtures. But a new mobile video
     surveillance system, co-developed by a pair of companies, aims to
     give SWAT, HAZMAT, fire, emergency rescue teams and other public
     safety forces the...

Major Carriers Lead AWS Auction
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19595?11228

     WASHINGTON -- Bidding in the FCC's Advanced Wireless Services
     (AWS) auction is approaching $13.5 billion, even though bidders
     have slowed the pace considerably in the last few days.  After 52
     rounds of bidding, T-Mobile USA, Verizon Wireless and Sprint
     Nextel's partnership with cable companies still lead in
     bid ...

Wi-Fi Alliance Rushes In With 'Pre' 802.11n Certification
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19593?11228

     Faced with the seemingly endless delay in the standardization of
802.11n (the new ultra-fast generation of Wi-Fi targeted at 200 Mb/s
and at eventual capability of 540Mb/s), the Wi-Fi Alliance
yesterday&nbsp;announced a nearly unheard-of scheme to certify the
interoperability of pre-n products long before standards
work by ...

VSNL Boosts Asia Subsea Capacity
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19587?11228

     With demand for telecom services booming across India and other
     Asian countries, Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (VSNL)is investing
     more than $600 million to upgrade its 20-terabit international
     submarine network with additional capacity.  In a move that will
     have equipment suppliers like Alcatel and Fujitsu Ltd. ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - August 31, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:51:23 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For August 31, 2006
********************************

VimpelCom Raises Direct Number Tariffs, Urges Connection Fee Dialogue
with Minor Operators
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19641?11228

     VimpelCom has announced that tariffs for customers in Moscow with
     'direct' numbers will rise by US$5 from 8 September 2006.
     They are seven-digit numbers that can be dialled from local
     fixed-line phones without the usual, national three-digit prefix. The
     cheapest direct number tariffs are currently priced at around US$20
     per...

Private-Equity Firms Eye TeliaSonera
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19637?11228

     Nordic telecoms group TeliaSonera is in the sights of
     private-equity fund Cevian, making it the latest big-name
     telecoms company in the sights of private-equity firms. Nordic
     paper Dagens Industri reports that Cevian and its allies have
     amassed substantial stakes in the company, and could be preparing
     a swoop. The report adds that Cevian ...

Telenor ASA Completes Acquisition of Serbia's Mobi 63
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19626?11228

     BELGRADE, Serbia -- Telenor ASA on Thursday formally took over
     Serbian mobile phone operator Mobi 63 after making the euro 1.5
     billion (U$1.9 billion) payment to the government.  Serbian Prime
     Minister Vojislav Kostunica said that the arrival of Telenor to
     Serbia is a proof that we are a stable country for foreign ...

Telefonica to Re-brand Fixed Line, Mobile Operations in Czech Republic
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19624?11228

     PRAGUE, Czech Republic -- The country's largest
     telecommunications company Telefonica O2 Czech Republic said
     Thursday it would begin re-branding its fixed-line and mobile
     services.  As of Friday, the company will begin using the O2
     brand for its fixed-line and mobile units, previously known as
     Cesky Telecom and Eurotel ...

Yahoo! Go Arrives on Windows Smartphones
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19621?11228

     Yahoo! is trying to up the ante against rival Google in the
     mobile space by making its Yahoo! Go for Mobile service available
     for smartphones operating on the Windows Mobile OS.  The Yahoo!
     Go service encompasses several applications, such as Yahoo! Mail,
     Yahoo!  Search, Yahoo! Photos, Yahoo! Address Book and Calendar
     and Yahoo!  News, ...

FCC Prepares For Another Big Spectrum Auction
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19618?11228

     Currently in the midst of an advanced wireless services (AWS)
     spectrum auction whose bids have already approached $13.6
     billion, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is now
     gearing up for a 2007 contest on radio frequencies collectively
     known the 1.4 GHz bands for both fixed and mobile services.  The
     FCC's Wireless...

Wireless Piggybackers Put on Notice
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19615?11228

     We've all done it: You're using your laptop in a location without
     hotspot access. You want onto the Internet, so you start scanning
     for open wireless LANs. You find one and, regardless of who owns
     it, you piggyback a ride onto the Web.  Yesterday, the California
     legislature passed a law (AB 2415) that takes the first steps ...

Alcatel Lucent Merger Under Fire
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19613?11228

     As Alcatel and Lucent Technologies Inc. prepare to merger, any
     hopes of a quiet wedding ceremony have been dashed by opposition
     from both sides of the Atlantic. The two firms have moved fast
     since they formally announced their engagement in early April
     this year, appointing (and re-appointing) senior management, ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: Denise C <deniseculver01@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Research on History of Automated Operator Services (AOS)
Date: 30 Aug 2006 09:05:00 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I am working on a dissertation thesis based on who the founder of
automated operator services (AOS) technology was. I'm specifically
interested in who developed AOS in customer-premises equipment, such
as in hotels or airports.

By trade, I am a freelance reporter. While working on a story about
the history of billing and collections, I discovered that there is a
great deal of debate as to whom founded AOS, and I've decided to prove
in my dissertation who that person is. That's why I'm looking for
help.

If anybody remembers what the first companies were to develop AOS in
hotels or airports, I'd be very interested in talking to you. You can
reach me by phone or email.

Denise Culver
281-655-9998
deniseculver01@sbcglobal.net

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Widow of Tombaugh 'Shook Up' by Decision
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:56:44 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


It really leaves Pluto little choice now but to attack us, as if we
didn't have enough "issues" already ...

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:17:41 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Before I answer, you should know I am not a big fan of VOIP.  IMHO it
> is overhyped and there are many technical details (like 911
> connectivity) to be worked out.  IMHO (and personal experience) many
> of the sales people often give out incorrect information and do not
> have adequate resources to serve customers correctly.  Thus, you may
> be promised something that doesn't come to be.

VOIP is a wonderful alternate method of telephone communications for a
lot of people.  I have had Vonage since its inception.  However, I
also maintain one LEC line as well.

Telecommunications is a complex marketplace, with all of its choices. 
Smart consumers almost always fare better than those who cannot, or will 
not, figure things out by doing some homework.

Vonage, for example, doesn't have the best customer service around,
but neither do most of the LECs these days.  And, unlike the LECs,
Vonage has a web site that provides all the options in a clear, quite
useful manner.  A potential subscriber can see in advance all the NPA
and office codes available.  If the potential subscriber cannot figure
out whether any of those are local calls for his physical area, he
isn't very able.

------------------------------

From: Matt Simpson <net-news69@jmatt.net>
Subject: Re: Ever Want to Throw Away Your Mobile Phone?
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:45:20 -0400


But before you do, read this:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/08/30/betrayed.byacellphone.ap/index.h
tml

or 

http://tinyurl.com/z5a73

for those who don't like pasting long URLs

------------------------------

From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units From Toll
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:17:31 UTC
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


In <telecom25.317.9@telecom-digest.org> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:

> I don't know how the phone company recorded charges back then.
> According to the Eng & Sci history, AMA tapes included message unit
> calls, so detailed records were available even if not shown on the
> customer's bill.  But message units could also be easily recorded on
> the same meters used to track local calls, just incrementing the
> counter as needed per call.  AMA was developed with No 5 crossbar in
> 1948 so it was theorectically available for NY.

The counters (one for each phone line) simply clicked off as needed. I
have no idea how they got the feedback to "know" whether to just click
once for a local, untimed, call -- or whether to click twice on start,
once every three minutes (or some other arrangement ...) depending on
distance.

NY Tel had a camera that literally was pushed against a (dozen at a
time?) counters and the numbers were then processed by someone or
another and added to the bill.

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:46:49 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> May 1966 -- NYT -- Suffolk County Long Island telephone subscribers were
> angry at a change in billing practices.  NY Telephone switched to a
> message unit system instead of itemized toll charges for calls outside
> one's calling area on Long Island.

> With "message units", the bill only shows a gross number of units
> rather than individually itemized calls.  The units charged per call
> vary by distance and time.

> Business people said they needed itemization for tax purposes.

> Others complained they had large bills but no way to figure them out.

> The phone company said the switch saved customers 20% in bookkeeping
> costs.  From the phone company's point of view, it is much simpler
> than listing on a bll a slew of 5c and 10c toll calls.It

The same B.S. was given by Pacific Telephone in the Los Angeles Metro
Area about the same time.  (probably the San Francisco Metro area as
well.)

I recall complaining about it, and the rep told me I could have my
message units itemized for a charge of 50 cents a month (like $4.00 a
month today).  I opted for this "nice service."

Within a year itemization of message units was free (after the
California PUC had to react to a bazillon complaints).

It all reminds me of an Al Capp cartoon of the era.  Al Capp was the
guy who drew the Little Abner cartoon in those days and who would
occasionally draw a "commentary" strip unrelated to his Dogpatch
characters.  One noteworthy strip he drew circa late 1950s or early
1960s, was at the executive offices of AT&T (the old Bell System) in
which the senior executives were jumping up and down with joy, and the
head guy says, "We made it!  Our billings for this month equal the
country's gross national product!"

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone
Date: 29 Aug 2006 14:26:52 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


davidk wrote:

> special information tone.

What is this tone?  Is this the three tones when you reach a bad number?

> My name is David Kocieniewski, I'm a New York Times reporter
> researching a story about the development and history of the special
> information tone.

The following website has some information:

http://www.bellsystemmemorial.com/recordedannouncements.html

The situation of "intercept" for when someone dials a non-working
number was recognized at the very beginning of dial service.  In panel
switching, calls were routed to an intercept operator who checked
into.  The dialed number may not be assigned at all or been
reassigned.

Dial PBX switchboards had separate appearances for intercept calls,
distinct from dial 0 attendant calls.

The Bell System gradually automated this function.  The first was a
recording to ask the customer to dial again, but remain on the line
for an operator.  This would handle most errors in dialing and allow
the intercept operator to serve changed numbers.

Then computers enabled storage of vocal digits in a natural way to
automate the whole process so the entire process was automated.

Actually, they attempted to automate recorded and playback voice many
years ago using a drum with motion picture sound film (using the sound
track).  Each track had a digit on it and the proper tracks would be
selected.  One use was for dial-to-manual exchanges to announce the
incoming number, instead of using a lighted panel.  Another was to
return routing information.  I don't think either application got very
far with the technology available at the time.

We had a Bell recording announcement machine, controlled by a keyset,
and it was large.  I believe the recording was held on some sort of
drum that rotated.  Considering the heavy playback and low maintainence,
plain recording tape couldn't be used as it would soon wear out.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #318
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Fri Sep  1 15:42:56 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 608002200; Fri,  1 Sep 2006 15:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #319
Message-Id: <20060901194256.608002200@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri,  1 Sep 2006 15:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:45:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 319

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    ISP Releases Name in File Sharing Case (Toby Sterling, AP)
    Tool Generates Fake Searches for Privacy (Anick Jesdanun, AP)
    Software Program 'Tattles' on Phone Thief (Sara Ledwith, Reuters)
    California Eases Cable Rules, Welcomes Telephone Companies (Adam Tanner)
    Western Lamp Cadences (Al Gillis)
    IRS Announces Telco Excise Tax Refund Amounts, Procedures (Danny Burstein)
    VOIP Info Site (Ruzzer)
    Alcatel to Buy Nortel's 3G Assets (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 01, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Telecom Update #544, September 1, 2006 (John Riddell)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (DLR)
    Re: Research on History of Automated Operator Services (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:17:58 -0500
From: Toby Sterling, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: ISP Releases Name in File Sharing Case


By TOBY STERLING, Associated Press Writer

The entertainment industry achieved a key victory Thursday after a
Dutch Internet service provider surrendered the name and address of
one of its customers suspected of illegal file-sharing.

Ronald van der Aart of UPC, the Netherlands' second-largest broadband
ISP with 500,000 subscribers, said the company decided not to appeal a
summary judgment by Amsterdam's District Court in a suit brought by
the Brain Institute, an organization founded to fight digital
copyright infringement.

Brain spokesman Okke Delfos-Visser said the agency would now contact
the UPC customer and would likely sue if a settlement isn't reached
first.  Similar cases in the United States are usually settled for
several thousand dollars.

Brain is funded by the U.S.-based Motion Picture Association and
Recording Industry Association of America, along with their
international and Dutch counterparts.

Previous attempts by Brain to force Dutch Internet providers to give
up names of clients suspected of illegal file-sharing had foundered on
technicalities. Brain and the organizations it represents say have
often been powerless to sue for copyright infringement because they
only have numeric Internet Protocol addresses assigned by companies
like UPC, not the actual identities.

UPC argued it cannot be certain which of its clients used a given IP
address at any given moment.

But in the current case, Brain had gotten a court order to seize the
servers of a now-defunct file-sharing network called "Dikke Donder,"
which used BitTorrent file-sharing software.

Stored on the Dikke Donder servers were records of the IP and e-mail
addresses that network members had used to sign up for the group.
Several addresses were issued by UPC, including one to a user called
"muzan."

The Amsterdam District Court ruled that, taken together, the e-mail
and IP addresses must have been enough for UPC to know the identity of
the Dikke Donder user. Any objections, it said, were "so theoretical
that there can't be any discussion of a 'reasonable doubt.'"

E-mail attempts to reach the client, using an address identified in
court documents, bounced. UPC did not disclose the person's identity
to The Associated Press.

UPC is a subsidiary of Colorado-based Liberty Media Corp.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:27:32 -0500
From: Anick Jesdanun, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Tool Generates Fake Searches for Privacy


By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer

A new tool seeks to make your searches more private by hiding them in
plain sight.

TrackMeNot periodically sends fake, innocuous queries to search
engines, making it harder for someone to glean your actual search
habits by reviewing the companies' logs that contain your queries.

The tool comes as AOL revealed it had released the search histories of
more than 650,000 subscribers. Although user names were not included,
the company admitted that the search terms themselves could contain
sensitive information. Two AOL employees were fired and a third
resigned over the disclosure.

The tool, developed by two researchers at New York University, sends
random searches, such as "boston clock" and "croissant," to the four
largest search engines -- Google Inc., Yahoo Inc. Microsoft Corp.'s
MSN and AOL. A fake search is made, on average, every 12 seconds under
default configurations; the tool can generate millions of unique
queries from its list, and users can add their own.

TrackMeNot, however, works only with the Firefox browser, which has less 
than 10 percent market share, according to WebSideStory.

It's also not foolproof. Someone knowing the list of terms TrackMeNot
uses can simply strip those records out of the databases. Developers
say they are working on expanding the list.

TrackMeNot is available at: http://mrl.nyu.edu/dhowe/TrackMeNot

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news, headlines and audio news from AP, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:33:03 -0500
From: Sara Ledwith <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Software Program 'Tattles' on Phone Thief


The phone, the thief, his wife and a Chihuahua? 
By Sara Ledwith

If you took the photo of a Chihuahua at
www.flickr.com/photos/benvoluto/216323527/, you have caused a Web
sensation.

The mobile phone used to take that picture was stolen from Web
designer Ben Clemens on an Amtrak commuter train in California in
mid-August, he says.

Days later, thanks to software installed in the phone for Clemens'
use, the Chihuahua picture and other snaps of a woman and children
were automatically posted to Clemens' photo Web site for the world to
see.

"Even the thief doesn't have any privacy, right?" said Clemens by
telephone from his home in Berkeley, California.

His account of the incident, posted on the weblog he keeps up for
friends and family, came to the attention of thousands of people and
in late August ranked as one of the most popular Offbeat News items
this year on "social content" Web site www.digg.com.

While some Web "vigilantes" set out to expose wrongdoers -- or other
users notoriously circulate sensational fake stories to gain exposure
for new products -- Clemens says his discovery of the software's
potential to bust this criminal was an accident and the subsequent
attention unwanted.

In "Pictures of the family of the person who stole my cell phone
posted to my flickr account," at
http://www.practicalist.com/archives/000183.html, the Yahoo
Inc. employee tells how the software he installed on his phone was set
to automatically upload pictures to http://www.flickr.com, a site where
people post photos for friends, family, or the world to share.

The thief -- or whoever bought the phone from the thief -- appears not 
to have known the software keeps running even with a different user or 
SIM-card. So their shots were viewed thousands of times by people on the 
Web.

Despite assertions from the independent makers of the software that
the tale is not a promotional stunt on their part, some Web users --
who may have fallen for so-called "guerrilla marketing" tactics in the
past -- rounded on Clemens, accusing him of making the story up.

"This is totally a viral marketing campaign ... It's a nice
implementation, with just enough flaws to be found out fairly quickly,
but believable enough," says a relatively polite contributor to one of
many strings of comment to the story.

"I've entered into some surreal world," Clemens told Reuters.

"People assume I'm doing it for self-promotion, marketing, a hoax or
something like that. I'm talking to you because I want it to be known
that it's not a hoax. I'm just too ordinary. I'm just too unclever for
that."

He says the experience has been a lesson in the way the modern Web
works: "(On the Web today), you can no longer have a separate --
private and public -- world. It makes you realize you have to be even
more honest and careful."

He has now disabled the software and says he is not seeking justice,
revenge, or even his mobile phone. He would quite like his life back.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:35:43 -0500
From: Adam Tanner <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: California Eases Cable Rules, Welcomes Telephone Companies


By Adam Tanner

California's legislature passed a bill on Thursday night aimed at
increasing competition among cable television providers and easing the
ability of telephone companies to enter the market.

The state's Assembly by a vote of 64 to 5 backed an amended bill
passed by the California Senate the night before. The Assembly had
approved an earlier version of the legislation in May.

"California has led the way in the evolution of new technology, and
with this bill, our state's policy toward contemporary TV and
entertainment technology is catching up to the times," Assembly
Speaker Fabian Nunez, who has championed the legislation, said in
statement.

The measure, passed ahead of a midnight deadline for new bills, still
needs the signature of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to become
law.

The bill eliminatea city-by-city franchises, which Nunez said made it
nearly impossible for rivals with new technologies to enter
California's market for TV entertainment services.

According to an analyses by the state Senate's Rules Committee, 63
percent of California TV-watching households have cable reception, 27
percent subscribe to satellite service and the rest use conventional
antennae.

TELEPHONE COMPANIES TO GAIN

Telephone companies including AT&T Inc. have lobbied to eliminate laws
requiring franchise deals with municipalities before they may offer
television service. Verizon already offers television service in six
California cities.

AT&T plans to invest up to $1 billion in California through the end of
2008 to upgrade its telephone network in the state and to launch an
Internet-protocol video entertainment service, which would compete
with cable-TV companies.

The California legislation comes as lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are
considering a bill that would make it easier for telephone companies
to get licenses for cable television service. Yet, Congress has a
short calendar this year and may not act.

Other states, including Texas, have passed similar legislation making
the licensing process simpler. If Congress does not act, analysts
expect other states to follow Texas' and California's lead.

Telephone and cable companies are fighting to sign up as many
customers as possible for a bundle of services including telephone,
cable television and high-speed Internet access, which often cost more
than $100 a month.

(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington)

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

From: Al Gillis <alg@aracnet.com>
Subject: Western Lamp Cadences
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:54:42 -0700
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95


Back in the "Good Old Days" Western Electric produced a number of
products that used different lamp on/off cadences to indicate various
circuit conditions.  1A and 1A2, for example had a flash cadence
(~500ms on, 500ms off) and a wink cadence (~250ms off, 750ms on).
There was another cadence on some products that I recall being called
"flutter" which had a very rapid on/off cycle.  Does anyone know what
the on/off time intervals of this cadence were?

Thanks in advance!

Al

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: IRS Announces Telco Excise Tax "Refund" Amounts, Procedures
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:08:43 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


" The Internal Revenue Service today announced the standard amounts
that most long-distance customers can use to figure their telephone
tax refund. These amounts, which range from $30 to $60, will enable
millions of individual taxpayers to request the telephone tax refund
without having to dig through old phone bills.  ...  " To get the
standard amount, eligible taxpayers only need to fill out one
additional line on their regular 2006 return. ...

rest:
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=161504,00.html
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
 		     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: Ruzzer <crutter@comcast.net>
Subject: VOIP Info Site
Date: 1 Sep 2006 05:45:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Seems to have some good articles and threads

http://www.BestVoip.ws 

Regards,

Ruzzer

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:44:39 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Alcatel to Buy Nortel's 3G Assets


USTelecom dailyLead
September 1, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epeQfDtusXbzhNQELk

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Alcatel to buy Nortel's 3G assets
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* DT cuts prices, offers new bundled packages
* Cable group among top bidders in airwaves auction
* Verizon expands FiOS in Massachusetts
* Market for broadband gear soars, report says
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Your bookshelf is not complete without these books
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* College sporting events now available on broadband
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* Philips phone lets Skype users make calls sans computer
* Nokia's updated N80 integrates VoIP into interface
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* IRS details rules for phone tax refund
EDITOR'S NOTE
* The dailyLead will not be published Monday
DIVERSIONS
* Some Material May Be Inappropriate or Mystifying, and the Rating May
  Be as Well
* Western Grandeur Without the Crowds
* Bulky Boxes That Can Take Great Photos
* The Noblest Collie of All Bounds Anew in the Glen
* Chicago Critic Criticized for an 'Unfair' Review

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epeQfDtusXbzhNQELk

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 01, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri,  1 Sep 2006 11:26:34 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 01, 2006
********************************

Deutsche Telekom Slashes Prices to Stop Customer Flight
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19670?11228

     The troubled German fixed-line incumbent announced price cuts of
     up to 30% and a number of new products at the latest
     International Consumer Electronics Show, in Berlin (Germany), in
     efforts to fend off rivals poaching its market share. At the same
     time, Deutsche Telekom recognises that cutting prices alone will
     not be ...

Vodafone to Launch Flexible Tariff Plan
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19667?11228

     Vodafone UK is set to launch an ambitious marketing campaign
     today to promote a new flexible tariff plan, the Independent
     reports. The new flexible tariff is aimed at matching offers from
     its rivals and would be similar to T-Mobile's 'Flext' tariff
     plan. The new price plan will allow customers to add or remove 
     services such ...

Nokia Buys German Navigation Software Firm Gate5 -- To Offer Mobile
Map Functions
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19662?11228

     HELSINKI, Finland -- Nokia Corp. said Thursday it will buy gate5,
     a German maker of navigation software, allowing the world's
     largest cell phone maker to offer maps on its mobile devices.
     Maps and navigation are natural elements to be offered in
     mobile devices but this area hasn't developed as fast as
     expected ...

Alcatel Boss Defends Terms of Lucent Tie-Up
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19659?11228

     Alcatel SA chief executive Serge Tchuruk defended the terms of
     his company's planned US$13.4 billion (Euro 10.5 billion) tie-up
     with U.S. rival Lucent Technologies Inc., in an interview
     published yesterday by financial daily Les Echos.  The proposed
     share swap is appropriate for a friendly merger of the kind
     unveiled by the two ...

Nokia Introduces Mobile Internet Device
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19655?11228

     Nokia revealed details of its new Nokia N80 Internet Edition, which is
     designed to help drive adoption of the mobile Internet. The company
     also is preparing to open its fifth Flagship Store.       The device
     offers wireless LAN (WLAN) connectivity, a browser, Internet calls, a
     3-megapixel camera, and quad-band GSM W-CDMA. The N80 also ...

Verizon Caves In: Disputed DSL Surcharge Dropped
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19651?11228

     Less than a week after BellSouth also backed down, Verizon
     Communications yesterday said it has pulled the plug on a
     controversial digital subscriber line (DSL) surcharge that sorely
     disappointed federal regulators and outraged consumer groups.
     The Verizon and BellSouth moves, undoubtedly made under pressure from
     an emerging ...

New Mobile-to-PC Worm Arrives
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19648?11228

     Security software firm F-Secure Corp. has discovered a
     mobile-to-PC worm that it says could be a harbinger of things to
     come in the fast-moving world of wireless worms. The 'Mobler'
     worm, the firm posts, moves between the Symbian and Windows
     operating systems and vice versa. The worm creates code on the
     Symbian side that ...

Alcatel Snags Nortel 3G Unit
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19644?11228

     Alcatel has agreed to buy Nortel Networks Ltd.'s UMTS (3G) access
     business and assets for $320 million, the two vendors announced
     this morning. The two companies have been in talks for some time,
     but the agreed price will surprise some industry
     observers. Analysts at French outfit Oddo Securities had put a
     price tag of ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #544, September 1, 2006
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 14:13:28 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca
Number 544: September 1, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:

** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page
** BIG PIPE: www.bigpipeinc.com
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

IN THIS ISSUE:

** CRTC to Review Regulatory Thresholds
** CRTC Lists Phone Customer Rights
** Nortel to Sell UMTS Access Business
** CRTC Rejects Bid to Block Hate Sites
** BCE Backs Away from Telesat Sale
** Mitel Announces Round of Layoffs
** Globemedia Reorganization Closes
** CATA Names Telecom Associate
** Hackers Access Credit Card Info on AT&T Website
** Google to Offer Skype Calls
** ATB Financial Signs with Telus for VoIP
** Unionists Sign With Telus Quebec
** Videotron Wireless Expands to Gatineau
** Inter-Tel Rejects Buyout Offer
** Save $100 on Enterprise Networks Conference

CRTC TO REVIEW REGULATORY THRESHOLDS: Responding to the Federal
Government's request for a review of local service regulation (see
Telecom Update #529), the CRTC has reaffirmed its Voice over IP
regulatory regime while initiating a reassessment of two local service
regulatory thresholds.

** CRTC Telecom Decision 2006-53 declines to deregulate VoIP
   service, as Canada's major telcos had requested, and=20
   reaffirms that VoIP is a telephony service. (See Telecom
   Update #481, 490)

** The Decision states that recent market share data warrant
   a review of the 25% market-share threshold that incumbent
   phone companies must lose in order to qualify for
   regulatory forbearance. Also up for review is the 20%
   threshold for removing the local service winback rule.
   (See Telecom Update #524)

** Dissenting opinions were filed by Commissioners Barbara
   Cram, Stuart Langford, and Andree Noel.

** Telecom Public Notice 2006-12 initiates a proceeding to
   reassess the two thresholds. To take part, register by
   September 11.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-53.htm
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Notices/2006/pt2006-12.htm

CRTC LISTS PHONE CUSTOMER RIGHTS: The CRTC has issued a "Statement of
Customer Rights" with respect to local phone service and directed the
telcos to publish it on their websites and in their White Pages
directories. Customer rights are listed under 16 headings including
local service, choice of provider, confidentiality, and refund for
billing errors.

** These rights are addressed in telco "terms of service,"
   but the CRTC is concerned these documents "may be
   difficult for consumers to comprehend."

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-52.htm

NORTEL TO SELL UMTS ACCESS BUSINESS: Nortel Networks has agreed to sell
the access segment of its UMTS business to Alcatel for US$320 million. 
UMTS is a "third generation" wireless technology developed as a
successor to GSM. Nortel is keeping its GSM, CDMA, and core UMTS
divisions.

CRTC REJECTS BID TO BLOCK HATE SITES: The CRTC has rejected a request by
Richard Warman, an Ottawa lawyer, that it permit carriers to block
access to two U.S.-based neo-Nazi websites.  Warman said the sites call
for "violent action" against him and violate Canadian law against
"communicating hate" and "advocating genocide."

** In the Commission's view, permitting the sites to be blocked would be
inappropriate without a public process to "allow for consideration of
the broader policy and legal issues."

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Letters/2006/lt060824.htm

BCE BACKS AWAY FROM TELESAT SALE: According to published reports, BCE
has failed to reach agreement with potential buyers of its Telesat unit
and has decided instead to sell a minority stake in the satellite
company through an Initial Public Offering. (See Telecom Update #534)

MITEL ANNOUNCES ROUND OF LAYOFFS: Mitel Networks has eliminated an
unspecified number of jobs as part of its "transition to an IP
communications company." At the end of April, Mitel had 1,650
employees, 13% fewer than two years earlier.

** Mitel says its IP-based product revenues in fiscal 2006 were 48%
   higher than in the previous year.

GLOBEMEDIA REORGANIZATION CLOSES: Bell Globemedia says its new
ownership structure is now in effect, following approval of the deal
by the Competition Bureau. The new Board is chaired by Geoffrey
Beattie of Woodbridge, now the largest shareholder. BCE has received
$1.3 billion from the reduction of its stake in the media company to
20%. (See Telecom Update #538)

CATA NAMES TELECOM ASSOCIATE: CATAAlliance has named Jean-Guy Rens, a
telecom writer and consultant, as Research Executive and member of its 
Governing Council. Rens is President of ScienceTech Communications.

HACKERS ACCESS CREDIT CARD INFO ON AT&T WEBSITE: AT&T says that hackers
have obtained credit card and other personal data on approximately
19,000 customers who had purchased DSL equipment from the telco's online
store. AT&T has offered to pay for credit monitoring of affected
customers. (See Telecom Update #543)

GOOGLE TO OFFER SKYPE CALLS: Google has agreed to post click-to-call
buttons enabling users to make calls to its advertisers using EBay's
Skype service.

** Google says that it will sell a business version of its
   email and calendar software by year-end.

ATB FINANCIAL SIGNS WITH TELUS FOR VoIP: ATB-Financial has signed a
three-year, $8.3 million contract with Telus for provision of IP-based
voice and data services.

UNIONISTS SIGN WITH TELUS QUEBEC: About 1,000 CUPE members in Quebec
have ratified a new contract with Telus. The contract introduces a
"variable pay component tied to the company's success," which will
provide up to 5% of basic salary by 2009.

VIDEOTRON WIRELESS EXPANDS TO GATINEAU: Videotron now offers its
cellular service to the 250,000 residents of the Gatineau valley in
Quebec. (See Telecom Update #541)

INTER-TEL REJECTS BUYOUT OFFER: Inter-Tel, a U.S.-based PBX and key
systems maker, has turned down an offer to purchase from a group
headed by its founder, Steven Mihaylo, and is continuing a "review of
the Company's strategic options." (See Telecom Update #543)

SAVE $100 ON ENTERPRISE NETWORKS CONFERENCE: September 8 is the last
day to obtain the $100 early-bird discount for registrants to the
October 24-25 Enterprise Networks conference in Toronto.

** The conference program, sponsored by Angus Dortmans
   Associates, aims to enable telecom and IT professionals to
   understand the chaotic enterprise networks landscape and
   assemble the insights needed for better decisions.

** For more information, email Mona Polhill at
   mona@enterprisenetworks.ca <mailto:mona@enterprisenetworks.ca> . To
register online, visit www.enterprisenetworks.ca.

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE

E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There are two 
formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the World Wide Web late
   Friday afternoon each week at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.

   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:
      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com=20

   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send=20
   an e-mail message to:
      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see http://www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further
information, including permission to reprint or reproduce, please
e-mail jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from
sources which we believe to be reliable, but Angus
TeleManagement makes no warranties or representations
whatsoever regarding accuracy, completeness, or adequacy.

Opinions expressed are based on interpretation of available
information, and are subject to change. If expert advice on the
subject matter is required, the services of a competent professional
should be obtained.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:18:03 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Sam Spade wrote:

> Smart consumers almost always fare better than those who cannot, or will
> not, figure things out by doing some homework.

> ... A potential subscriber can see in advance all the NPA and office
> codes available.  If the potential subscriber cannot figure out
> whether any of those are local calls for his physical area, he isn't
> very able.

Unfortunately, in today's world it's a great deal of homework and
everday consumers don't have the time to do it.  To make it worse, the
situation constantly changes; someone who is knowledgeable today will
be obsolete six months from now.  (I think the companies do that
purposely to keep people confused and benefit from inertia.)

The average person doesn't know what an "NPA" or office code even is.
A phone number is a phone number.  Keep in mind that neighbors that
once had one or two exchanges serving them now have a great many.
Depending on the service option (low, medium, high), my local calling
area covers SEVEN area codes, and minor toll service (5c minute) adds
another three area codes to that.  That's an awful lot of exchanges to
keep in mind.

Note how many regulars in this newsgroup need to discuss today's
service options and debate clarifications and specifics.  If "people
in the know" aren't sure of the situation, how can everyday people?

In the old days a person could simply ask their neighbor and compare
bills since everyone had the same situation.  Can't do that today.

A lot of people use their cell phones at all times, but such service
costs about $50+ a month and is subject to poor quality (last night I
was talking to such a person and the reception was horrible, I could
barely hear them.)  I'd sure hate to need to make an urgent call and
discover I'm in a dead spot or the battery is dead.

As to customer service, I use Verizon and am very satisfied with them.
It's much better now that my LD is with them instead of AT&T.  I'm not
quite as happy with their wireless service; they buried a notice about
holidays no longer counting as offpeak time in text about obscure
overseas calls, but they gave me a credit for the calls I made.

[TELECOM Digest Eidtor's Note: What Sam Spade does not grasp, and what
the telcos grasp all too well, is that most non-telco people do not
understand, nor do they care about the workings of the telephone 
company. Over the past century, telco has made lots of money based on
the ignorance of the general public, and they are still at it.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:15:50 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP


Sam Spade wrote:

> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

>> Before I answer, you should know I am not a big fan of VOIP.  IMHO it
>> is overhyped and there are many technical details (like 911
>> connectivity) to be worked out.  IMHO (and personal experience) many
>> of the sales people often give out incorrect information and do not
>> have adequate resources to serve customers correctly.  Thus, you may
>> be promised something that doesn't come to be.

> VOIP is a wonderful alternate method of telephone communications for a
> lot of people.  I have had Vonage since its inception.  However, I
> also maintain one LEC line as well.

> Telecommunications is a complex marketplace, with all of its choices. 
> Smart consumers almost always fare better than those who cannot, or will 
> not, figure things out by doing some homework.

> Vonage, for example, doesn't have the best customer service around,
> but neither do most of the LECs these days.  And, unlike the LECs,
> Vonage has a web site that provides all the options in a clear, quite
> useful manner.  A potential subscriber can see in advance all the NPA
> and office codes available.  If the potential subscriber cannot figure
> out whether any of those are local calls for his physical area, he
> isn't very able.

The biggest difference between Vonage and the ILEC (with folks like
Time Warner somewhat in the middle) is that with Vonage if it doesn't
work no mater what you'll have to hire a consultant or abandon the
service. With the ILECs you can go to WalMart or Staples or whatever
and buy a phone for $10 to $20 that can be plugged into the DeMarc. If
things work, it's your problem, most likely wiring. If they do not
work at this point a nice (usually) person in a truck with a big logo
on the side will arrive and fix things.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Research on History of Automated Operator Services
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:33:08 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Denise C wrote:

> I am working on a dissertation thesis based on who the founder of
> automated operator services (AOS) technology was. I'm specifically
> interested in who developed AOS in customer-premises equipment, such
> as in hotels or airports.

I guess the first question is what is your definition of AOS?

The function of the telephone operator on toll calls is two fold:  1)
to make the physical connection and 2) handle the billing.

Originally operators did it all 100% manually.  Gradually automation
assisted their effects.  In the 1930s, the call set up work was
streamlined.

After WW II the physical connection part was automated (over time).
That is, the operator no longer built up a connection via various toll
centers, rather, she simply dialed the area code and number.  She
continued to handle the billing work.

Shortly afterwards customers could dial their own station calls.
Operators were needed only on coin and person/collect/card/3rd/special
calls.  Then customers could even dial those with the operator doing
less and less.  Further, the billing work itself was automated,
operators no longer had to watch the time and write up toll tickets.
In more recent years, machines could listen for coin drops or accept a
keyed in card number.  I don't know how today they handle verifying
collect or person or 3rd number.

So, as you can see, the "automation" part of operator assistance has
been going on since the 1930s.  It's nothing new, and not attributable
to a single person.  The level of automation has varied from one point
in time to another as well as from place to place.  Indeed, some travel
terminals had attended public telephone centers where an attendant in
person assisted your call needs .

The owner of an hotel can and usually has added a surcharge for making
any telephone call from a room.  When pay phones were a dime a room
call was 50c.  Long distance surcharges varied.  Nothing new here.  The
work was usually done by the hotel operator with some assist and
automation from Bell.

As to airports, that's a more recent change.  These days, pay phones
may be privately owned and operated, and the payphone owner (through
the owner of the property its located on) may charge whatever they
want and handle the call any way they want.  The call handling itself
is an operator call as discussed above.  Sometimes the traditional
telephone company handles it, sometimes a specialty firm handles it.

I hope I didn't confuse the issue, but I think more definition of what
you're looking for in terms of historical context is necessary.

[public replies, please]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units From Toll
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:44:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Danny Burstein wrote:

> The counters (one for each phone line) simply clicked off as needed. I
> have no idea how they got the feedback to "know" whether to just click
> once for a local, untimed, call -- or whether to click twice on start,
> once every three minutes (or some other arrangement ...) depending on
> distance.

The Eng & Sci book and early writeup on panel describes how the
counters were incremented for local calls.  Under operators, she
pressed a key.  For automation, certain signals were sent along the
sleeve (as opposed to tip and ring) at disconnect time if the call was
answered for more than 2 seconds.  Indeed, in switching lots of
signals were sent that way, from small/high pos/neg currents to AC
signals.  Automation knew at the start not to increment for "official"
calls.

It is relatively easy to increment once per call.  To increment for
suburban calls, the system would need (a) a timer and way to increment
per period, and (b) a machine lookup table to know the base increment.

 From the readings I've gotten so far, it appears the conversion of
suburban calls to message units (with direct dialing instead of
operator handling) happened after WW II.  Before that such short calls
were operator handled.  NY Telephone was quite emphatic that dial
wouldn't reduce operator staff and it didn't since so many calls still
requird operator assistance and traffic was growing so rapidly.  In
NYC, calling between boroughs or a long distance within a borough was
toll and an operator was required.  Panel routed such calls to
intercept.

> NY Tel had a camera that literally was pushed against a (dozen at a
> time?) counters and the numbers were then processed by someone or
> another and added to the bill.

That was part of the panel system.

In the 1920s and 1930s I can't imagine the tedious job of posting all
the camera readings to customer accounts then subtracting last month
from this month.  There was a sliding scale of message unit cost--the
unit cost went down for large consumption.  Hopefully in the 1940s
they used IBM machines which were ideal for that application.  (the
"Mark sense" cards used as toll tickets were fed directly into IBM
machines).

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #319
******************************
    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Sep  4 12:01:33 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id E5744222F; Mon,  4 Sep 2006 12:01:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #320
Message-Id: <20060904160132.E5744222F@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon,  4 Sep 2006 12:01:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:05:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 320

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Call Center Employee Arrested for Credit Card Fraud (AFP News Wire)
    Voice Recognition Goes Wireless (Jim Finkle, Reuters)
    We Live in a World of Redundancies (InfoWorld NewsFactor News Wire)
    Employment Opportunities: Telecommunications Engineer Needed (3z3k3l)
    Re: California Eases Cable Rules, Welcomes Phone Companies (Rick Merrill)
    Re: Voicewing (t@auzinger.org)
    Re: VOIP Info Site (Tester)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Sam Spade)
    Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin Died! This is Very Sad (3z3k3l)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:44:16 -0500
From: Agence France Presse News Wire <afp@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Call Center Employee Arrested for Credit Card Fraud


Call centre worker in India held over fraud

A call centre employee has been arrested in eastern India for
allegedly using the credit cards details of US customers to make
online purchases.

Sulagna Ray, 23, was accused of obtaining the credit card information
while selling US customers a television service as part of her job,
the Times of India reported Saturday.

Ray, an aspiring fashion designer, allegedly spent 4,000 dollars
(3,122 euros) using other people's credit cards to buy an
air-conditioner, microwave, cosmetics, saris, jewellery and chocolate.

The theft was discovered when a California-based firm, Syssoft Corp,
complained of fraudulent purchases made through its e-commerce
website, the deputy police commissioner in Kolkata, Gyanwant Singh,
told the daily.

Ray worked for Jaishree Infotech, an Indian company handling work for
another US e-commerce website.

The police traced the woman through the Indian website from which she
had purchased the products. It provided the goods' delivery address.

Ray appeared in court Friday.

In June, police in the technology hub of Bangalore arrested an
employee of global banking giant HSBC for allegedly taking 230,000
pounds (333,000 euros, 418,500 dollars) from 16 bank accounts held by
Britons.

In recent years, many foreign companies have switched call centre work
to India to save costs but there has been growing concern about
potential fraud.

Copyright 2006 Agence France Presse.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td_extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:47:22 -0500
From: Jim Finkle <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Voice Recognition Goes Wireless


by Jim Finkle

Zee Tawasha is an unabashed Blackberry addict, constantly sending urgent 
e-mails to employees at 30 mobile phone stores he owns across 
California, Arizona and Nevada.

Until recently, he used his fingers to painstakingly type out messages
on the wireless device's cramped keyboard.

But with a new service launched by his network provider Sprint Nextel
Corp. on Friday, Tawasha can press a button and say the recipient's
name and dictate a message of up to 20 words into his Blackberry's
receiver.

Within about a minute, the full message appears on the screen and he
can send it off with one keystroke.

The technology was developed by privately-held MobileVoiceControl
Inc., one of a number of companies developing voice control systems as
consumers increasingly use mobile devices to surf the Web, shop and
download ring tones.

While handsets have long incorporated voice controls, the features
have not yet been embraced by many consumers because of limited
functionality and accuracy.

"It really works," said Tawasha, who has been testing
MobileVoiceControl's product for about three months. But he said that
the new technology has its limitations: "You have to learn to speak
slowly and clearly."

The product has been available on Sprint Nextel since late last year,
although the carrier only formally launched it to business customers
on Friday.

Analysts said other mobile networks could begin rolling out
next-generation voice control services before the end of the year,
hoping the improved functionality will spur demand for high-speed data
services.

International Business Machines Corp. and Nuance Communications Inc.,
two developers of voice-control technology, said recently they are
working with major wireless carriers on similar products, although
they declined to give details.

Motorola Inc. has said it plans later this year to start selling a
phone with local language voice commands.

"Text is about the most difficult and awkward user interface for
anything on the cell phone. The best way is to talk to the damn
thing," says Roger Entner, an analyst with research firm Ovum.

U.S. carriers have spent billions of dollars beefing up their networks
for high-speed data services, but are still waiting for the
investments to pay off. Usage remains limited partly because it is
tough to surf the Web using small screens and keyboards.

A Reuters reporter testing the MobileVoiceControl product on a Sprint
Treo 700p smart phone found text responses were 100 percent accurate
on 10 e-mails entered by voice, although it took the system an average
of 53 seconds to generate each email, with response times ranging from
30 seconds to 2 minutes.

The $6 a month service offers about 15 voice command functions,
including email, text messaging, calendar entries, address book
searches, Google searches and weather reports.

It is now available on high-end Sprint and Nextel smart phones. The
carrier plans to start rolling it out on conventional cellphones
before the end of the year.

Charles Golvin, an analyst with Forrester Research, said it will take
three to four years before mainstream mobile phone users embrace voice
controls.

"The technology has come a tremendously long way, but it's not 100
percent," he said earlier this week. "I think people get frustrated."


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news.html   (and)
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:06:29 -0500
From: Infoworld Newsfactor News Wire <infoworld@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: We Live in a World of Redundancies


We live in a world of redundancies. Take the telephone. Most of us
probably have one sitting right there on our desk, next to our
computer.  It's used for talking to people.  But do we really need a
separate device?

"No" is the short answer from a growing number of tech heavyweights
pushing "unified communications" technology that combines and
integrates voice, video conferencing, e-mail and IM on a single IP
network.

The technology is still in its infancy, with companies lining up to be
the "Microsoft of unified communications" -- including Microsoft
itself.

"There are hundreds of millions of people who will be getting a new
communications experience over the next four or five years," Microsoft
CEO Steve Ballmer said in recent a webcast.

Ballmer was celebrating a deal between his company and Nortel to
jointly develop new converged IP communications technology.

The deal brings Microsoft's operating system and applications
strengths together with Nortel's voice and services expertise.

Unified communications products from Microsoft and Nortel could be
attractive to I.T. managers who are worried about problems integrating
products from companies such as Cisco and Avaya with Microsoft wares,
said Mike Gotta, an analyst at the Burton Group.

One question is how closely Microsoft and Nortel will adhere to
standards like those being developed by the Business Process Execution
Language group, said Frank Dzubeck, president of consulting company
Communications Network Architects.

The two companies could embrace standards, or follow Microsoft's
"embrace and extend" strategy of tweaking standards to differentiate
their products.

Copyright 2006 InfoWorld. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2006 NewsFactor Network. All rights reserved.

------------------------------

From: 3z3k3l <rixride@hotmail.com>
Subject: Telecommunications Engineer Needed
Date: 4 Sep 2006 07:18:03 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Analyzes telecommunications functions of organizations. Works to
develop, improve, maintain, and implement network. Functions with
close supervision. Has knowledge of commonly-used concepts, practices,
and procedures. Relies on instructions and pre-established guidelines
to perform the functions of the job. Familiar with a variety of the
field's concepts, practices, and procedures. Must have extensive
experience and ability to plan and accomplish goals.

http://jobs.pbxinfo.com/index.php?module=phPro&func=display&jid=553&sortby=&order=asc

More Telecom and PBX Jobs at http://www.pbxjobs.com

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:00:19 -0400
From: Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: California Eases Cable Rules, Welcomes Telephone Companies


Adam Tanner wrote:

> California's legislature passed a bill on Thursday night aimed at
> increasing competition among cable television providers and easing the
> ability of telephone companies to enter the market.

And not a mention of the damage this may do to Public Access TV and
our 1st Amendment rights to access the media!!!!!

------------------------------

From: t@auzinger.org
Subject: Re: Voicewing
Date: 2 Sep 2006 05:46:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Marco Polo wrote:

> I am on a one year gig with Voicewing which is over in September. They
> provided me with a Linksys PAP2 Adapter for VOIP. I found a better
> deal with Viatalk but I don't know if Verizon locked this to their
> setup.  Anyone know??

Thanks.

I know that VT (see my review at http://www.betterphone.org ) lets you
BYOD (bring your own device).  You might also look at 
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=688.  Maybe VT's customer
service can give you an unofficial pointer.  The difference between
BYOD and non-BYOD is about $40.  You could also get VT's box and ebay
the Verizon box, if you own it outright.

------------------------------

From: Tester <ankit.tester@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VOIP Info Site
Date: 2 Sep 2006 14:13:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Yeah, that seems to be a good site. I've one more for you, if you
wanna check: http://voiponline.bravehost.com/

Ankit Arora

Ruzzer wrote:

> Seems to have some good articles and threads
> http://www.BestVoip.ws 

> Regards,

> Ruzzer

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: 1 Sep 2006 12:57:00 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What Sam Spade does not grasp, and what
> the telcos grasp all too well, is that most non-telco people do not
> understand, nor do they care about the workings of the telephone
> company. Over the past century, telco has made lots of money based on
> the ignorance of the general public, and they are still at it.  PAT]

There are a lot of guilty parties in this.

Some state legislatures and PUCs that purport to be protecting
consumers actually end up costing consumers money and adding to
confusion.

For example, take the conversion from calls being cash toll to message
unit, many consumers would end up saving money.  Under the cash
system, every call was a charge.  Under the message unit system, every
customer had an allotment of units; if they did not exceed that
allotment they got free calls that otherwise would've cost.  Further,
the cost per msg-unit dropped for high volumes, so high volume callers
got an additional discount.  The phone company gained efficiency by
avoding detail billing of literally nickel and dime calls which was
passed on to consumers.

Well, the PUCs mandated detail billing which raised the cost and other
modifications in the public interest.  They made something that was
relatively simple rather complex.

Fast forward to today's phone bill.  My bill is so thick it requires
extra weight postage yet I have flat rate service!  There are many
lines of detailed expenses for literally pennies.  Money is broken
down into many overlapping categories that make no sense.  This
confusion isn't from the phone company, it's from government milking
the taxes and PUCs trying to "protect" me (and deadbeats who don't pay
their bills).

The government mandated "competition" so we had an explosion of new
exchanges.  That meant 10,000 numbers were set aside even though only a
few hundred at most would be used.  That resulted in numerous new area
codes and overlays which add to the confusion.

The old line phone companies adopted a "can't beat them, then join
them" philosophy.  They're getting hammered by cheapo and sleazy
competitors so they've had to do the same practices to cut costs and
lower prices.

Let me emphasize that competition does not mean prices will be as low
as possible.  Prices will drop to a common shared equilibrium.  Cell
phones run around $40/month now they were a lot cheaper before.  All
the companies charge roughly the same.  They could lower prices but
don't want to.

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:25:36 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Sam Spade wrote:

> [TELECOM Digest Eidtor's Note: What Sam Spade does not grasp, and what
> the telcos grasp all too well, is that most non-telco people do not
> understand, nor do they care about the workings of the telephone 
> company. Over the past century, telco has made lots of money based on
> the ignorance of the general public, and they are still at it.  PAT]

Sam understands it all very well.

I agree with both you and Ms. Hancock that the LECs don't want it to
be easy.

I do disagree that it takes much research, though, to determine one's
local calling area, at least in California and a few other states that
I am familiar with that have all local office codes that are local
clearly listed in the front of the phone book.

Then again, some of today's consumers can't find Mexico on a world
map. ;-)

As to extended calling plans that some folks may have, that is
irrelevant when selecting a primary or virtual number for Vonage.  Why
make it more complicated than it has to be?

Vonage makes it easy, really easy.

------------------------------

From: 3z3k3l <rixride@hotmail.com>
Subject: Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin Died! This is very Sad
Date: 4 Sep 2006 07:56:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Just found out that Steve Irwin the crocodile hunter has just died in a
bizarre accident.

I really enjoyed watching his documentries.


http://www.pbxinfo.com/forums/showthread.php?p=101735#post101735

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Steve Irwin did do good work on his
various documentaries. He will be missed.   PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #320
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep  5 15:37:03 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id DF9F02260; Tue,  5 Sep 2006 15:37:02 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #321
Message-Id: <20060905193702.DF9F02260@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2006 15:37:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:37:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 321

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Irwin's Death Clogs Web Sites, Blogs (Paul Tait, Reuters)
    Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (Michael Perry)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 05, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Is AT&T Up to Its Tricks Again? (nospam256k@yahoo.com)
    Phone Numbers I am Interested in (Radium)
    DT Announces Business Revamp (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies (mc)
    Re: Western Lamp Cadences (Sam Spade)
    Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Call Center Employee Arrested for Credit Card Fraud (Lisa Hancock)
    Help Me Telecom Master Proposal (Mohab)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:16:34 -0500
From: Paul Tait <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Irwin's Death Clogs Web Sites, Blogs


Irwin's death clogs Web sites, stuns world fans 
By Paul Tait

In death as in life, iconic TV naturalist Steve Irwin captivated
millions worldwide and clogged the Internet as fans from Guam to
Glasgow reacted with disbelief to news "The Crocodile Hunter" was
dead.

Some Web sites groaned to a halt within hours of the first reports on
Monday that Irwin had been killed by a stingray's barb through his
chest in a freak diving accident off Australia's northeast coast.

Web measurement company Hitwise said Irwin's death was the biggest
news event read by Australians on the Internet since two Australian
miners were trapped by a mine collapse in southern Tasmania state in
late April.

"We noticed that the Web site http://www.crocodilehunter.com increased
in popularity quite substantially. It became the number one
entertainment personality Web site in Australia yesterday and in the
United States it also became the third most popular," Hitwise
Asia-Pacific marketing director James Borg told Reuters.

Australian news Web sites struggled to keep up with demand.

The Australian Broadcasting Corp.'s site http://www.abc.com.au) had to 
temporarily shut down, posting a notice on Monday that it was 
experiencing higher than normal traffic.

It resumed soon after in a low-bandwidth format to cope with hundreds
of thousands of hits.

Newspaper Web sites also wobbled but kept up with demand.

A spokesman for The Sydney Morning Herald's site,
http://www.smh.com.au said it had experienced a "huge" 40 percent
spike in page impressions compared with the previous week's average
weekday number of about 500,000.

There was also a 70 percent jump in visitors to its pages, the spokesman 
said.

That pattern was mirrored around the world, with Irwin's death leading
major news Web sites such as CNN and U.S. and British newspaper Web
sites, as well as swamping their most viewed and most emailed
categories.

Web logs and Internet feedback pages were also awash with postings
from shocked readers from around the world, many of them from
Americans charmed by Irwin's quirky style and his typically Australian
catchphrase of "crikey."

Irwin first found fame in the United States before his "Crocodile
Hunter" documentaries on U.S.-based television company Discovery
Communications' Animal Planet attracted a global audience of 200
million -- 10 times Australia's population.

"Crikey, I miss him so much," Tina Treece from Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, posted on a CNN feedback page
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/09/04/australia.irwin.feedback/index.html . The site had contributions from readers in Guam, 
Romania, Thailand, France, Scotland, India, New Zealand, Canada, Brunei, 
Britain, Malaysia, Denmark and the Netherlands.

Many faced the problem of explaining to their children how one of
their favorite TV characters had died.

"Why did it have to be Steve Irwin?" 11-year-old Daniel told
Australian Associated Press.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:22:36 -0500
From: Michael Perry <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity


By Michael Perry

Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity
taskforce presented on Tuesday has found.

The International Obesity Taskforce said some Internet sites that 
attracted children with advertising games were being used to bypass 
stricter advertising standards in traditional media, the 10th 
International Congress on Obesity in Sydney heard.

The taskforce found that 85 percent of businesses advertising to 
children on television also had interactive Web sites for them.

It said 12.2 million children had visited commercial Web sites
promoting food and beverages over a three-month monitoring period in
2005.

An analysis of this marketing found that food and beverage advertisers
paid lip service to advertising codes of conduct. It said some Web
sites pressure children to purchase before they played online games.

"Viral marketing downloads and links from 'advergames' to corporate
Web sites were against the spirit of the self-regulation system's
provisions," researchers at Britain's Middlesex University in said.

"While it is relatively easy to control the content of television and
print advertising, controlling the content on online advertising and
'advergames' ... is a lot more complex."

The taskforce has said an epidemic of obesity, now estimated at 1.5
billion people worldwide, has led to more type 2 diabetes in obese
children.

"At the moment the need to protect children from commercial
exploitation was being largely overlooked by the food and advertising
industries," said Boyd Swinburn, president of the Australasian Society
for the Study of Obesity.

"We need to recognize that everyone in society has a responsibility to
ensure we provide healthy environments for children," Swinburn told

CITIES AT FAULT

The week-long conference also heard that many children were "victims
of poor urban designs" that discourage outdoor activity.

"Many aspects of the physical environment present barriers to children
from being outside and directly contribute to their declining levels
of physical activity," said Dr Jo Salmon, Senior Research Fellow in
the School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences at Deakin University in
the Australian state of Victoria.

"Small changes to urban design such as age-appropriate playground
equipment ... could have a significant impact on overall activity
levels across the day," she told the conference.

Salmon said parental security and safety concerns that kept children
at home were also limiting the physical activities of children and
contributing to obesity.

She said her research found 70 percent of five- to six-year-olds and
80 percent of 10- to 12-year-olds exceeded the recommended two-hour
daily limit for Internet and television entertainment.

"Children who know their neighbors and have strong social networks 
within their neighborhood are much more likely to be active," she said.


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 05, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2006 11:58:00 EDT



********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 05, 2006
********************************

Fast-Growing Private Companies Hint At Changing Business Climate
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19688?11228

     CEOs of the nation's fastest-growing private companies may be
     signaling a change in the business climate. They are increasingly
     concerned about weak market demand, runaway energy costs, and
     escalating interest rates. And their optimism about the economy
     is ...

Mobile Navigation Finds its Way
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19687?11228

     Location-based services (LBS) for consumers using cell phones
     have been around for years, but, so far, they haven't generated a
     great deal of attention. Some analysts think that's changing,
     though, as networks and phones align with GPS ...

Sony Says Mylo
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19684?11228

     Readers of a certain age will recall long days and nights spent
     with their trusty transistor radio. Somewhat younger readers will
     remember being inseparable from their Walkman. Time marches on,
     and Sony is now trying to get a today's teens and young adults
     hooked on a device that's designed to serve as all-in-one
     communications ...

Vodafone Names New Europe CEO
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19682?11228

     Mobile giant Vodafone has appointed Vittorio Colao as the new
     chief executive of Vodafone Europe and new deputy chief executive
     of Vodafone Group. Colao replaces Bill Morrow, who resigned
     recently as chief executive for Europe. Colao was formerly chief
     executive of Vodafone Italy with oversight responsibilities for
     southern Europe, the ...

Operators Submit Bids for 3G Licences in Slovenia, Romania
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19679?11228

     Slovenian mobile players Mobitel and Si.mobil and telecoms
     provider T-2 have entered the race for three 3G licences on offer
     in Slovenia, creating the potential for a third mobile operator
     in the country by year-end 2006. Mobitel-the mobile unit of
     Slovenia&#39;s state-owned Telekom Slovenije-is competing against
     Si.mobile, a Telekom ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: nospam256k@yahoo.com
Subject: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again?
Date: 5 Sep 2006 07:17:33 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I'm one of those people in New York City who make few or no
out-of-town calls from my landline phone. I currently have AT&T as my
long distance carrier, and I'm on the "One Rate Simple" plan. It has a
higher per-minute rate, but NO monthly charge and NO monthly minimum.
That means that if I make no out-of-town calls, I get charged
absolutely nothing.

This past week, I got surprised by an invoice in the mail from them,
charging me for $5 plus other surcharges and taxes, plus what they
claim to be an unpaid balance of the same from last month, total bill
of over $12!

When I visit their website, it says that the plan I'm on (the "One
Rate Simple" plan) now has a monthly minimum charge of $5 as of July
1st !

First of all, they had never notified me that they would start
charging a monthly minimum charge, and they also never sent me any
bill for the previous month either!

Has anyone else had this happen?

Although some people conceivably may have been sent notification, I
strongly suspect that AT&T had intentionally neglected to send
notification to many others so as to cause charges to incur before the
customer has a chance to cancel out.

AT&T has a history of abusive practices, including a legal action two
years ago where AT&T had to pay refunds to New Yorkers who were
improperly billed.

Has anyone else had this happen to them recently where they were on
the "One Rate Simple" plan and they recently got a bill for a minimum
usage fee without prior warning?

Are we required to pay these charges if we got no prior notice?  Are
we required to prove that we never received prior notice?  What can be
done?

------------------------------

From: Radium <glucegen1@excite.com>
Subject: Phone Numbers I am Interested In
Date: 5 Sep 2006 07:22:37 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hi:

I'm looking for TDD [not TTY] numbers, fax numbers, and dial-up modem
numbers in:

1. Stamford, Connecticut
2. Switzerland
3. Holland
4. Canada
5. France
6. Russia
7. Germany
8. London
9. Italy
10. Japan
11. Phillipines
12. Kenya
13. Greece
14. India
16. Belgium


Thanks,

Radium

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:19:05 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: DT Announces Business Revamp


USTelecom dailyLead
September 5, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epoMfDtusXbCmDivOl

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* DT announces business revamp
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Vonage continues to fight on despite struggles
* Broadband use increases, but millions still use dial-up
* Cisco unveils smaller version of CRS-1
* Vodafone brings former executive Colao back into the mix
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Beyond Video: Addressing Strategic Network Transformation
HOT TOPICS
* Alcatel to buy Nortel's 3G assets
* Verizon offers free online games
* AT&T inks Wi-Fi deal with Illinois city
* DirecTV venture plans VoIP test
* California Senate approves statewide franchise bill
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Mobile sounds good to record industry
* Cingular outfits cruise ships for mobile phone use
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* US Internet wins Minneapolis Wi-Fi deal
DIVERSIONS
* The Frugal Traveler Sees the World
* Online Game, Made in U.S., Seizes the Globe
* Heading Off a Headache: Have Bags Shipped
* The Last Stand of the 6-Percenters?
* Smoke if You've Got 'Em on This Airline Next Year

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epoMfDtusXbCmDivOl

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:30:08 -0400


From: Infoworld Newsfactor News Wire <infoworld@telecom-digest.org>

> We live in a world of redundancies. Take the telephone. Most of us
> probably have one sitting right there on our desk, next to our
> computer.  It's used for talking to people.  But do we really need a
> separate device?

> "No" is the short answer from a growing number of tech heavyweights
> pushing "unified communications" technology that combines and
> integrates voice, video conferencing, e-mail and IM on a single IP
> network.

The reason for having the telephone separate from the computer network (and 
even the electric power connection) is so that it will still work when the 
others don't.

Imagine being completely incommunicado during a computer network failure. 

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Western Lamp Cadences
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:42:43 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


Al Gillis wrote:

> Back in the "Good Old Days" Western Electric produced a number of
> products that used different lamp on/off cadences to indicate various
> circuit conditions.  1A and 1A2, for example had a flash cadence
> (~500ms on, 500ms off) and a wink cadence (~250ms off, 750ms on).
> There was another cadence on some products that I recall being called
> "flutter" which had a very rapid on/off cycle.  Does anyone know what
> the on/off time intervals of this cadence were?

> Thanks in advance!

Don't recall ever seeing the one you refer to.  But, wasn't the fast
flash called wink hold?  I know the other was visual ringing.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Different Area Codes, Same Rate Area, and LNP
Date: 5 Sep 2006 08:24:01 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Sam Spade wrote:

> I do disagree that it takes much research, though, to determine
> one's local calling area, at least in California and a few other
> states that I am familiar with that have all local office codes that
> are local clearly listed in the front of the phone book.

My local telephone directory requires 12 (twelve) pages of charts to
describe the various local calling areas.  Clear?  I don't think so.

Helping to muddy the waters is that the exchange named refers to the
principal town center where the exchange is physically located.
However, in suburban areas the municipality name, post office name,
and generally used name are all different.  Thus the exchange may be
listed as in A-Village, but will also include parts of X township and
Y township.  The next town, B-Village, will have the other parts of Y
Township and Z Township.

Again, back in the day when a suburban telephone exchange hosted one
or maybe two NNXs this wasn't a problem.  My town had ONE exchange,
now it has 20 (TWENTY).

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Same thing here. For how many ever
centuries, we got along just fine with 620-EDison and its newer
variation, 620-331. That was for everything and everyone. And it
still _mostly_ is that way. 630-330 and 620-332 were special cases;
330 was a few centrex setups around town, a lot of celllar phones,
including my own, etc. 332 was city government and cell phones. Then
Mercy Hospital's centrex started making outgoing calls on 620-332-2xxx
as well as some other centrexes around town. But now lately I am
seeing bunches of cell phones in 620-719 and 620-779 and 630-924. It
is getting harder to keep track of all the prefixes used,  same as
the huge number of area codes. PAT] 

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Call Center Employee Arrested for Credit Card Fraud
Date: 5 Sep 2006 10:46:16 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Agence France Presse News Wire wrote:

> A call centre employee has been arrested in eastern India for
> allegedly using the credit cards details of US customers to make
> online purchases.

This will continue and be a big problem.  I suspect this has happened
frequently already but the events are covered up by the companies.

At one time, when banks and other institutions were smaller, most
employees were very loyal.  Generally the jobs were very secure and
pleasant.

However, today banks have shifted from a family atmosphere to a boiler
room.  Employees now work in high pressure call centers where every
keystroke is monitored and EVERY error counted.  Calls are timed.
There are strict quotas to be met.  These are the equivalent of the
old Ford high speed assembly line, only electronic instead of
mechanical.  Employees are just a "resource", nothing more.  They come
and they go and no one cares.

Such atmospheres are more conducive to bad behavior, sabotage out of
spite, etc.

I remember a "Wonder Years" where Kevin got a job working at an old
fashioned hardware store.  The owner was a grouchy old man.  But Kevin
learned the hardware business well and the owner's wife treated him
like a son.  Kevin left and became an anoymous mall rat, not staying
very long at a food stand, and no one caring.

Those small businesses and that kind of boss-worker relationship are
very rare today with almost everything run by chains.  "Managers" are
some young self righteous snit, probably someone who was in the
corridor patrol in high school and took pleasure in challenging kids
for their hallpasses and kicking out those who didn't have them.  The
owning corporation looks at some numbers, not at people, despite what
their house newsletters and commercials proclaim.

Again, these are the atmosphere where employees feel like no one cares
 -- because no one cares -- and more likely to lash out from the
mindless bureacracy and quotas shoved at them.  People who lash out
steal.  What's to stop some bored waiter from taking a friend's black
box and secretly reading credit cards presented for payment?

------------------------------

From: mohab <mohabshihab@gmail.com>
Subject: Help Me Telecom Master Proposal
Date: 5 Sep 2006 12:06:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Dear friends,

 I'm to state study a master resarch in telecom
could anyone helps me propsing a research topic?

The topic that I want is to combine software and telecommunication.

I already have some proposal as
  1- telecome simulator
  2- network simulator
  3- telecome CAD system

Thank you for help.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #321
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Sep  6 14:08:17 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 6B76021EE; Wed,  6 Sep 2006 14:08:17 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #322
Message-Id: <20060906180817.6B76021EE@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2006 14:08:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:10:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 322

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Internet Radio Offerings Range From Sex Through Sermons (Adam Tanner)
    Google Expands Online News Index (Michael Liedtke, AP)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 06, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    M&A Fever Takes Telecom Gear Market by Surprise (USTelecom DailyLead)
    Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again? (jared)
    Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again? (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again? (Matt Simpson)
    Re: Phone Numbers I am Interested In (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Western Lamp Cadences (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:25:51 -0500
From: Adam Tanner <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Internet Radio Offerings Range From Sex Through Sermons


By Adam Tanner
 
Bill Goldsmith has converted the upstairs floor of his two-story
California home into a radio studio that broadcasts his favorite rock,
blues and folk tunes over the Internet.

What started six years ago as a labor of love has turned into a viable
business, and the recent introduction of stand-alone Internet radios
could bring even greater success as people change how they receive
their radio music and news.

"So far it is working out very well for us," the former FM radio disk
jockey said, explaining that he lives off listener donations. "People
really enjoy our programming enough so they feel its worth paying
for."

On Radio Paradise, he offers about 59 minutes of music per hour,
compared to about 40 to 50 minutes per hour on most conventional
commercial FM stations. Even former commercial-free FM areas such as
National Public Radio now repeatedly air sponsorship announcements
akin to advertising.

The flood of ads on traditional radio and the subscription costs of
satellite radio are driving listeners to Internet radio, whose
stations either rely on government funding (such as the
commercial-free BBC), donations (such as Radio Paradise), or
advertising (including FM stations that also stream on the Internet).

Some companies are also hoping to earn money through Internet radio
subscriptions.

Enthusiasts with fast connections have been able to tune into Internet
radio through their computers for a decade or more. But now the
long-delayed arrival of stand-alone Internet radios from equipment
makers such as Roku or Philips could greatly expand the market by
making it easier to tune in.

At its best, Roku's $400 SoundBridge Radio allows users to listen to a
station at the touch of a button.

"As time goes on, everyone is going to have Internet radio," said Roku
head Anthony Wood, 40, who invented the digital video recorder at
Tivo-competitor ReplayTV and started Roku four years ago with $9
million of his own money. "It's a huge market but for some reason it
is under-recognized."

According to a survey by Arbitron and Edison Media Research of 1,925
people earlier this year, more than one in five Americans over the age
of 12 listen to Internet radio monthly.

NOT PERFECTLY SEAMLESS

Even though Wood considers Roku his sixth company (Roku means sixth in
Japanese), the place still has the feel of an Internet start-up. He
showed off his offices dressed in shorts and a T-shirt, and unpackaged
Internet radios lined the office hallway in this Silicon Valley
bedroom community.

The unfinished process of creation sometimes manifests itself in the 
firm's music streaming and Internet radio products. As with many 
software programs, sometimes things go mysteriously wrong, making 
Internet stations or audio ripped onto your computer unavailable. Still, 
the products are a hit with hardcore audio enthusiasts and other patient 
music fans.

"It's a lot better than it was two years ago," Wood said. "It's got a 
little ways to go before it's perfectly seamless."

The reward for the occasional snafus are a huge choice of Internet 
stations, which range from global media corporations to enthusiasts 
operating from their garages.

Some stations focus narrowly on bands such as the Beatles or Grateful 
Dead. Others offer music from Cuba, Iran, China or even Antarctica, from 
where Anetstation.com broadcasts guitar blues music. Others focus on 
talk, from the sacred, to more profane topics such as on YNOT Radio, 
which focuses on the adult film industry.

Some are small hobbyists with few listeners, others are real businesses 
which pay royalties on the music they play.

"We're not coming from a basement at this point," said Sandy Shore of
Smoothjazz.com, which has been on air since 2000. "The cream of the
crop of Internet radio will rise to the top."

The path to finding new stations involves searching Internet sites such 
as AOL's shoutcast.com, vtuner.com or live365.com.

Shore, who broadcasts about five minutes of ads and talk per 55
minutes of music, started in FM radio. "I was growing more and more
frustrated by the direction radio was going," she said.

At Roku, Wood sees his company's future in licensing its software at
the heart of a $25 wireless computer chip to make Internet broadcasts
a standard feature on radios and stereos within five years. Such
components soon will make possible the $99 Internet radio, he

Roku started to turn a profit in the last few months, Wood said. His
firm had revenue of $4.2 million in 2005 and expects $5.8 million this
year and $10 million next year. Retailer Best Buy is Roku's biggest
outlet.

One obvious obstacle to growth is limited mobility of Internet radio. 
But the spread of citywide Wi-Fi networks may one day make car Internet 
radios and other devices possible.

"As the Internet becomes more and more of a mobile medium," Goldsmith of 
Radio Paradise said, "the increase is going to grow rather more rapidly."

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:28:12 -0500
From: Michael Liedtke, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Google Expands Online News Index


By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer

Google Inc. is expanding its online news index to include stories
published years ago, continuing the Internet search leader's recent
efforts to create new sales channels for long-established media while
it strives to make its own Web site even more useful.

The news archive to be unveiled Wednesday includes old articles
provided by a long list of media, including The New York Times, The
Wall Street Journal, Time magazine and The Washington Post.

Other leading information storehouses like LexisNexis, Factiva and
HighBeam, also have opened up sections of their databases to Google's
expanded index.

Until now, Google's 4-year-old news search service has focused
primarily on stories posted on the Web during the past 30 days.

The new archives feature will only share excerpts from stories related
to users' requests, which are expected to range from seminal moments
in history to minutiae about sports and science.

To see the full stories, Google's visitors will be sent to the Web
sites that own the content. Those referrals figure to provide media
outlets with more opportunities to charge for access to the full
stories a common practice when people want to read historical
information.

"This is going to be a very good thing for us," said Vivian Schiller,
senior vice president and general manager of NYTimes.com. "There is a
tremendous hunger out there for our archives."

Google won't collect any commissions for the sales referrals, hoping
instead to make money indirectly from increased usage of its own site
 -- the hub of a vast advertising network -- that accounted for most of
the company's $1.3 billion profit during the first half of this year.

The arrangement marks Google's latest attempt to demonstrate the value
of its search engine to the traditional media, a segment that has
sometimes railed against the Mountain View-based company for profiting
from the display of content owned by others.

The friction triggered a copyright infringement lawsuit by one major
news organization, Agence France-Presse, which is seeking at least
$17.5 million in damages. Google has denied the allegations.

Signs of a more cordial relationship with major media have emerged
during the past month as Google announced separate business deals with
The Associated Press and Viacom Inc.'s MTV Networks. The search engine
also is aggressively promoting a video service that allows television
networks and movie studios to sell content.

The news archive service represents "a perfect example of how we can
work with content providers to realize their business goals," said Jim
Gerber, Google's content partnerships director.

Patrick Spain, chief executive of HighBeam Research Inc., views
Google's new service as a significant breakthrough for his
Chicago-based service, which charges for access to most of the 40
million articles in its database.

"We would love to have people just come to HighBeam to do all their
searches in the first place, but we are not naive enough to believe
that is going to happen," he said.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 06, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2006 12:13:00 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 06, 2006
********************************

Vonage Hits 2 million Subscribers
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19719?11228

     U.S.-based VoIP provider Vonage announced today that it has passed the
     2-million subscriber mark. "Activating over 2 million lines is a
     milestone for both Vonage and the industry," Chairman and Chief
     Strategist of Vonage Holdings Jeffrey A. Citron said. "As we
     continue to grow our business, innovation will be a key focus ...

Frequencies May Be Allocated for 3G and WiMAX in Russia
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19716?11228

     Russian regulators may start allocating radio frequencies for 3G
     mobile services and broadband wireless networks, Prime-Tass
     reports, citing the press office of the IT and Telecommunications
     Ministry.  According to the report, the State Radio Frequency
     Commission decided at a meeting on Monday (4 September) that the
     frequency band between ...

EU Clears Private Equity Firms to Buy Dutch Cable TV Operator Casema
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19707?11228

     BRUSSELS, Belgium -- EU antitrust regulators on Wednesday cleared
     private equity firms Cinven Ltd. and Warburg Pincus LLC to buy the
     Netherlands third-largest cable television operator Casema BV.
     The two agreed in July to pay Euro 2.1 billion (US$2.6 billion) for
     the company from another group of private investors ...

Auction Still Going, But Slowing
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19704?11228

     WASHINGTON -- Bidding in the FCC's Advanced Wireless Services
     (AWS) auction is approaching $13.5 billion, even though bidders have
     slowed the pace considerably in the last few days. After 52
     rounds of bidding, T-Mobile USA, Verizon Wireless and Sprint's
     partnership with cable companies still lead in bid expenditures ...

Canada Examines Looser Incumbent VoIP Rules
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19701?11228

     Canadian regulators have opened a proceeding to reassess the
     conditions for lightening up on rules that ostensibly restrict
     incumbent telcos in the emerging Voice over Internet Protocol
     (VoIP) business. This comes amid new government conclusions that
     competition in the country's local telephony service marketplace
     is taking hold more ...

Cisco & Pals to Unwire Silicon Valley
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19698?11228

     Cisco Systems Inc. and friends have scored one of the biggest
     contracts in the burgeoning municipal mesh WiFi market --
     unwiring 1,500 square miles of America's tech mecca, Silicon
     Valley.  The networking giant said late on Tuesday that it --
     along with Azulstar , IBM Corp., and SeaKay -- had won the deal
     against ...

Cisco's Secret Franchise
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19695?11228

     It's well known that Cisco Systems Inc. customers are just
     about forced to buy optics from Cisco, and at hefty markups. The
     practice is an annoyance to some customers -- and now a report
     suggests investors should start worrying about it, too.
     Cisco's practice of reselling optical modules represented 25
     percent of the ...

Nintendo, Sony Are Only Two Survivors in Handheld Game Market
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19692?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- In the past year, the Nokia N-Gage, Tapwave
     Zodiac, and Gizmondo have all been taken off the market, leaving
     only two competitors in the handheld game platform space:
     Nintendo and Sony. In the current generation of handheld
     consoles, the Nintendo DS will outship the Sony PSP over the life
     of the consoles, ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:31:09 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: M&A Fever Takes Telecom Gear Market by Storm


USTelecom dailyLead
September 6, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epAYfDtusXbIiHxOqR

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY
* M&A fever takes telecom gear market by storm
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* BT sees green in China
* Cisco crafts new image as it chases consumer electronics business
* Free Wi-Fi system coming to Silicon Valley
* Nortel inks six European deals, focuses on 4G
* Apple, Amazon finalizing deals for movie downloads
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Beyond Video: Addressing Strategic Network Transformation 
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* BellSouth tests new 411 system
* Will viewers want to go "LocationFree" with Sony?
* Old media likely to reap benefits from new
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC wireless auction approaches $13.5B
DIVERSIONS
* For the New Face of CBS News, a Subdued Beginning
* An Island Where Even Millions Aren't Enough
* Budapest Is Stealing Some of Prague's Spotlight
* It May Get Harder to Shun Merlot
* How to Become a World Citizen, Before Going to College

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/epAYfDtusXbIiHxOqR

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:05:45 -0600
From: jared@netspacenospamnet.au (jared)
Subject: Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again?


1. Decide what you want to do for long distance. When QWEST did this,
I switched to using a calling card and don't have a long distance
carrier. I programmed my handsets with the 1-800 number so its not too
much hassle.  Esp as many calling cards will do a calling number id
and not require entering the card number, if one wants. The COSTCO via
MCI calling cards, when I bought one (or a friend who was a member
bought it), were no surcharge, no expiry and relatively inexpensive
(3cents/min within the USA), renewable by credit card over the
phone. There are heaps of other and maybe cheaper cards out there.

2. Write them (snail mail), saying what you said and ask for your money back.

3. If after a few months, no response, look up a corporate officer's name &
address and write her/him.

> When I visit their website, it says that the plan I'm on (the "One
> Rate Simple" plan) now has a monthly minimum charge of $5 as of July
> 1st !

> Are we required to pay these charges if we got no prior notice?

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again?
Date: 5 Sep 2006 21:20:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


nospam256k@yahoo.com wrote:

> First of all, they had never notified me that they would start
> charging a monthly minimum charge, and they also never sent me any
> bill for the previous month either!

> Has anyone else had this happen?

Unfortunately today MANY companies include key rate changes in fine
print buried in your monthly statement.  If you look closely at your
checking statement or phone bill, you'll notice lots of fine print,
usually about stuff like calling between New Zealand and New Foundland
being no longer discounted on Queen's Day, totally irrelevent to you.
But buried in such notices are rate changes that are significant to
you.

I bet if you got a magnifying glass and checked your past AT&T bills
or inserts you'll find such notice some months ago.

Anyway, I suggest calling them up and complaining strongly.  If they
don't waive the charges, dump them and get someone else.  (Others will
probably charge similar to AT&T though).  Local companies provide LD
now and I'm satisified with mine though my needs are different.

------------------------------

From: Matt Simpson <net-news69@jmatt.net>
Subject: Re: Is AT&T up to Its Tricks Again?
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:51:03 -0400


In article <telecom25.321.4@telecom-digest.org>, nospam256k@yahoo.com 
wrote:

> Has anyone else had this happen to them recently where they were on
> the "One Rate Simple" plan and they recently got a bill for a minimum
> usage fee without prior warning?

I had this happen several years ago.  It was a different plan, but it
was AT&T.  I had a plan that was 5 cents/minute with no minimum.
Suddenly they started charging me $5/month.  I called and raised hell,
and cancelled my service and got the charge reversed.

A quick web search will turn up many alternative long distance
services with low rates and no minimum.  The one I currently use
charges 3 cents/minute, with no minimum.  Since I use little long
distance, my bills are often a few cents or less.  They let it go for
months until it gets over $1.00, and then bill my credit card.

They also provide a toll-free number at no cost (unless somebody calls
it .. then you pay the regular 3 cents/minute).  I don't really need a
toll-free number, but I got it because it was free.  It's a "real"
number too, not one of those where the caller has to enter another pin
or extension number after calling the number.

Cancel your AT&T service.

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Phone Numbers I am Interested In
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:44:45 -0500
Organization: Disorganized


In message <telecom25.321.5@telecom-digest.org> Radium
<glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:

> Hi:

> I'm looking for TDD [not TTY] numbers, fax numbers, and dial-up modem
> numbers in:

> 1. Stamford, Connecticut
> 2. Switzerland
> 3. Holland
> 4. Canada
> 5. France
> 6. Russia
> 7. Germany
> 8. London
> 9. Italy
> 10. Japan
> 11. Phillipines
> 12. Kenya
> 13. Greece
> 14. India
> 16. Belgium

Why?

News: CIVIL SERVANT STAYS AWAKE ALL SHIFT LONG
"Man, I've really got to cut back on the caffeine" he says

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Western Lamp Cadences
Date: 5 Sep 2006 21:32:25 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Al Gillis wrote:

> Back in the "Good Old Days" Western Electric produced a number of
> products that used different lamp on/off cadences to indicate various
> circuit conditions.  1A and 1A2, for example had a flash cadence
> (~500ms on, 500ms off) and a wink cadence (~250ms off, 750ms on).
> There was another cadence on some products that I recall being called
> "flutter" which had a very rapid on/off cycle.  Does anyone know what
> the on/off time intervals of this cadence were?

I think lamp blinking varied by product.  On cordless switchboards,
IIRC there was 30, 60, and 120 flashes per minute.  One meant incoming
call, one meant ringing party, and one meant request for operator
service.  (I could look this up if desired).  The 608 cord board had
blinking supervisory signals.

IIRC some key systems had a double wink signal.

There may be signal for "camp on", that is a line waiting to be
connected as soon as someone completes the call.

I think toward of the end of key systems, perhaps with Call Directors
or the ComKey systems, there were more blinking options as they added
service options.  I used a ComKey but didn't care for it, modern or
not.  I don't like tone ringers and the loudspeaker intercom.  I think
ComKey was the last with a full thick cord with wires for each lamp
and function; then they went to electronic sets.

I don't recall a flutter.  However, our office had a tiny behive type
lamp that lit steady when the shared line was in use.  When the phone
rang, the lamp fluttered.  I think it was a neon bulb connected
straight to the line without a relay (that employer was pretty cheap
and would take only the cheapest solution).

Now the later generation "voice terminals" which had the red and green
lights could do several things and the ringing signals could be
programmed in all sorts of irritating ways.  I would so much prefer a
classic six button key set over them (Dimension? sets).  Fortunately I
have my plain old 2500 set, augmented by my 302 set*.

Upsets visiting high managers, but no one told me to remove it.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #322
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Sep  7 14:06:23 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id B056621E4; Thu,  7 Sep 2006 14:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #323
Message-Id: <20060907180622.B056621E4@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu,  7 Sep 2006 14:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:10:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 323

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    FIOS TV? Not For Me ... (txguy972@aol.com)
    HR5252 - Lobby For Cloture (Rick Merrill)
    Need Tap Into Telco Line (news@absamail.co.za)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 07, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    News Corp., Telecom Italia Discuss Content Deal (US Telecom DailyLead)
    Discovering Where a Number Is (Carl Moore)
    Re: Phone Numbers I am Interested In (Radium)
    Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies (Paul)
    Troubles With Mailing List (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Troubles With a Computer (TELECOM Digest Editor)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: txguy972@aol.com
Subject: FIOS TV? Not For Me
Date: 6 Sep 2006 12:29:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


You may want to think twice before signing up FIOS TV.

I took time off work today so I could have FIOS TV installed at my
home in Sachse, Texas. When the installers arrived they looked around
a little and said they would have to get to a wall outlet behind my
desk.  I said Ok fine let's do it, then he said that I would have to
move the desk because they aren't allowed. I can't lift this desk by
myself and the two installers were unwilling to help me slide it over a
foot so they could do their work.

I got the strong feeling that these installers were just looking for a
reason to get out of doing the install. C'mon, they can't help me
slide the desk over a foot?  When I called customer service to
complain it was more of the same, excuses about rules and I was even
told it was "against the law" for them to help me slide over a desk by
one very annoying CSR. When I asked here what law that was she
couldn't tell me. They SAY they are all about customer service but
their actions speak louder than their lame words.

When I got my FIOS Internet installed there were 3 guys here until
after 10PM doing the install. You should have seen the wire they ran
across my garage ceiling, it was really crooked and unprofessional. I
lent him a stapler since he didn't have one. He left a rolled up power
cord less than 2.5" away from a bare 300 watt light bulb on my garage
ceiling. I think Verizon's installers are mostly a bunch of new hires
with very little experience. And since they are hourly employees
finding reasons not to do jobs makes life easier for them for sure.

They should add a section to their advertisements and tell people on
the phone when they sign up that if there is any obstruction in front
of the router's wall outlet that they will not even touch it. Instead
of having people like me wasting their time and money sitting around
waiting for some installer to show up whine about rules and give BS
excuses why they can't do their job.

People should also be aware that for the $39.95 per month they
advertise you are unable to actually view FIOS TV, you also MUST rent a
box from them for an additional price PER TV. The $39.95 is misleading,
Verizon customer service told me that all the cable companies do that
too so its "standard" & therefore OK if someone else is doing it
too I suppose.

I talked to a friend in Plano that has FIOS TV today, she says her
service goes off and on a lot and that Verizon appears to be still
working out some bugs with it.

As for me, I canceled my order for FIOS TV; glad I didn't cancel my
Dish Network ...

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:25:54 -0400
From: Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
Subject: HR5252 - Lobby For Cloture


Here are two key points on Senator Stevens' cable and
telecommunications bill that came out of the NATOA annual conference
this past week, in particular from the NLC and other DC municipal
representatives who were present discussing the bill, which is HR
5252.

Point one -- You need to contact your Senators again, even if you have
done so already.  This is because we have learned that the phone
companies are visiting many Senators offices repeatedly -- such as
twice a week -- on the bill.

In response, municipalities need to be communicating regularly as
well.  So send another letter even if your municipality sent one a
month ago.  Better yet, if you sent a letter last month, make a phone
call this month, etc.

Point two -- The key message is "Vote against cloture on the bill",
don't let it come up for a vote.  That is the message that all the
national municipal groups are sending, and they want to make sure all
municipalities send as well.  Don't just say "vote against the bill"
or "oppose it".

So make sure that "Vote against cloture" is the message that you are
sending to your Senators.  We have updated the sample letter to Congress
on our web site to reflect this message -- go to www.varnumlaw.com/cable
 then to "Federal legislation" in the right column and then to the
August letters under "U.S. Senate, H.R. 5252 (formerly S. 2686)".

Reasoning -- It takes 60 votes for cloture, but only 51 votes to
approve the bill.  Senate Majority Leader Frist is insisting on
Stevens having 60 votes in favor before he will bring the bill up,
because Frist does not want to waste the small amount of time they
have in session in September on a bill where they cannot cut off
debate.  Senator Stevens could well get the votes to pass the bill,
but it is a lot harder for him to get the 60 votes to cut off debate.

Please do the preceding now, because the Senate is only back for a
short time in September, and things will move very quickly once the
Senators are back.

Questions, let us know,

John Pestle
Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett LLP

------------------------------

From: news@absamail.co.za
Subject: Need Tap Into Telco Line
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:57:08 -0500


My telephone line goes out via the PABX of a party who I believe is
listening in. We have a legal dispute, and I want to hear what they
are saying too.

I have access to the tag-block with their pair and mine.  How would I
best hear their conversations ?

My first thought is to just temporarily connect my pair to theirs,
observing the polarity, and while leaving mine on-hook, just tap-off
my line into an amplifier, which I can hear while I'm working.

A second refinement, would be to use capacitive coupling to their
pair.

I need to terminate my side with a high impedance, so that the
capacitive coupling can also have a high impedance.  So that it
becomes insignificant when I receive or make a call.

If I remove my handset, so that only the audio amplifier terminates my
line, during 'listening in', would it work ?

And then by just connecting my handset and/or modem could I expect to
operate without significant cross-talk to the looters line ?

Thanks for any info/feedback,

== "James bLond".

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 07, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu,  7 Sep 2006 11:55:24 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 07, 2006
********************************

Irish Regulator Launches Cost-Comparison Website
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19732?11228

     Irish telecoms market regulator ComReg has launched a
     cost-comparison website featuring fixed-line and broadband
     services http://www.callcosts.ie .  The website emphasises the
     high costs charged by national telecoms operator eircom, and
     encourages Irish consumers to switch to alternative telecoms
     operators.  Significance: According to ...

Pipex Beefs Up With Buys
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/110/19725?11228

     U.K.  competitive operator Pipex Communications plc today
     announced its intention to stick around and compete with the
     likes of BT Group plc &nbsp;by making two acquisitions, together
     worth 36 million (US$67.5 million) and signing a massive
     DSL wholesale deal worth up to 250 million ($469
     million). (See NetScreen's ...

Sprint Makes Deeper Commitment to Video
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19721?11228

     Sprint Nextel may have been the first U.S.  carrier to adopt
     mobiTV's mobile television service, but the carrier has  decided
     it needs to try to stay ahead of the pact when it comes to mobile
     video  advances. The latest: the carrier is making full-length
     pay-per-view movies  available for mobile phones.      The new
     service, dubbed ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:42:14 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: News Corp., Telecom Italia Discuss Content Deal


USTelecom dailyLead
September 7, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eqmIfDtusXbLnbGQQw

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* News Corp., Telecom Italia discuss content deal
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Report: Huawei overtakes Alcatel in optical networking
* RIM unveils the BlackBerry Pearl
* WiMAX contract with Sprint Nextel could boost Moto's bottom line
* Verizon, Cingular hungry for more spectrum at FCC auction
* Global Crossing unveils VoIP Community Peering service
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* NEW from Steven Shepard - WiMAX Crash Course
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* TI chips to let mobile phone users record TV shows
* SanDisk unveils portable device that records video
* Sprint offers pay-per-view movie service for handsets
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Lucent could face SEC charges
DIVERSIONS
* The Risk-Free Pleasures of $10 Bottles
* A Room With a Pedicure
* In a Sea of Cellphones, a Pearl
* Jude Law Is an Actor in Demand
* Don't Keep All Your Data in One Stash

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eqmIfDtusXbLnbGQQw

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:20:39 EDT
From: Carl Moore <cmoore@ARL.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Discovering Where a Number Is


I happened to come across a recent MSNBC TV program regarding some
newsmakers.  As part of that, I saw an item on Scott Peterson
(convicted of murder of pregnant wife, Laci, in California).  So there
was the part about having Amber Frey as a mistress, and Scott
P. claimed to be calling her from Europe and supposedly gave a
telephone number which Amber found to be in Modesto, California.  Does
anyone else recall the program I am writing about?

------------------------------

From: Radium <glucegen1@excite.com>
Subject: Re: Phone Numbers I am Interested In
Date: 6 Sep 2006 13:36:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


DevilsPGD wrote:

> In message <telecom25.321.5@telecom-digest.org> Radium
> <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:

> Hi:

>> I'm looking for TDD [not TTY] numbers, fax numbers, and dial-up modem
>> numbers in:

>> 1. Stamford, Connecticut
>> 2. Switzerland
>> 3. Holland
>> 4. Canada
>> 5. France
>> 6. Russia
>> 7. Germany
>> 8. London
>> 9. Italy
>> 10. Japan
>> 11. Phillipines
>> 12. Kenya
>> 13. Greece
>> 14. India
>> 16. Belgium


> Why?

Out of curiosity and interest. Thats all.

> News: CIVIL SERVANT STAYS AWAKE ALL SHIFT LONG
> "Man, I've really got to cut back on the caffeine" he says

------------------------------

From: Paul <PSSawyer.does.not.want.spam@unh.BAD.EXAMPLE.edu>
Subject: Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:48:16 UTC
Organization: Me


mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote in
news:telecom25.321.7@telecom-digest.org: 

> The reason for having the telephone separate from the computer
> network (and even the electric power connection) is so that it will
> still work when the others don't.

> Imagine being completely incommunicado during a computer network
> failure. 

This may have been valid 20 years ago, but even POTS is no longer on a 
reserved pair all the way back to the CO.

Even though there is supposed to be standby power all the way, when I
have a power outage at home, the POTS line from Verizon fails within
about 10 seconds (probably at the SLIC across the street), while the
other line, from the cable TV service (not VOIP), keeps working.

Logic tells me it should be vice-versa.


Paul

------------------------------

Subject: Troubles With Mailing List
Date: Thu,  7 Sep 2006 13:10:20 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


It came to my attention today (Thu, 9-7) that the Digest mailing list has
not been going out for whatever reason since 8-28. I have been sending 
them faithfully as always to the majordomo setup John Levine maintains
but for whatever reason they are not getting there, or at least (if they
are getting there, not sure) they are not going out. John Levine is 
reviewing his logs to see if he can figure it out. All I can suggest
at this time is for mailing list readers to instead read us on the
web at http://telecom-digest.org or else via Usenet comp.dcom.telecom

PAT

------------------------------

Subject: Troubles With a Computer
Date: Thu,  7 Sep 2006 13:19:26 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


This note is intended for the person who graciously and generously
sent me a very old UNISYS Windows laptop several months ago. It worked
with a NetGear Wireless card MA-401. It seems to me he lives out west,
around Washington State or maybe Oregon.

Unfortunatly, my electronic address book got lost, with all its names,
addresses, etc and I have no way to get in contact with this person.
I need to speak to the person very badly regards the computer. This
UNISYS lost a lot of its files in a crash when the power was out, I
need those files to make the laptop run. The only evidence I have on
him is I _think_ his name is 'Shapiro'. If he ses this, please call me
or email me.  Thanks.


PAT

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #323
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Fri Sep  8 15:43:11 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 6761221E6; Fri,  8 Sep 2006 15:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #324
Message-Id: <20060908194311.6761221E6@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri,  8 Sep 2006 15:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:45:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 324

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Facebook Adopts New Privacy Policy (Reuters News Wire)
    Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme (Grant Gross, IDG News)
    Telecom Update #545, September 8, 2006 (John Riddell)
    Evaluating Bandwidth Solutions For Your Business (FreedomFireCom)
    Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, no Address? (Lisa Hancock)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 08, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Alcatel-Lucent Deal Get Green Light From Shareholders (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone (Joe Singer)
    Re: Discovering Where a Number Is (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Need Tap Into Telco Line (GlowingBlueMist)
    Re: Need Tap Into Telco Line (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies (Rick Merrill)
    Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies (hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com)
    In an Ideal, Perfect World ... (TELECOM Digest Editor)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:00:26 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Facebook Adopts New Privacy Policy


Fast-growing U.S. social network Web site Facebook said on Friday it
has adopted new privacy controls following an unprecedented online
backlash over a new feature that let users track their friends online.

Facebook, which has about 9.5 million members comprised mostly of
students, said it now will let users control what and how much
information is shared about their activities on the network.

Earlier this week, the site introduced new features called "News Feed"
and "Mini-Feed" that instantly notified users of their friends'
activities on the network, including who they contacted and how they
changed their profiles, which ignited a protest backed by more than
600,000 members.

"These additional privacy features put control of who sees what
information in News Feed and Mini-Feed directly in the hands of our
users, just as they requested," Mark Zuckerberg, founder and chief
executive of Facebook, said in a statement.

The new privacy controls now let users block information on the News
Feed and Mini-Feed features, as well as a setting to remove the
time-stamp of postings.

Facebook, the No. 2 social network behind News Corp.'s MySpace.com,
had been lauded for its privacy protections until the new features
were announced.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:01:56 -0500
From: Grant Gross, IDG <idg@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme


by Grant Gross, IDG News Service

A U.S. district court has ordered a halt to an operation that
allegedly added unauthorized charges to the phone bills of small
businesses and nonprofit groups for Web sites services that, in many
cases, they didn't know they had and didn't request, the U.S. Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) said.

Judge Kenneth Hoyt of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas has approved a temporary restraining order halting
the activity and freezing the assets of a group of businesses and
individuals, the FTC announced yesterday.

The FTC's original complaint named defendants WebSource Media,
BizSitePro, Eversites, Telsource Solutions, Telsource International,
Marc R. Smith, Kathleen A. Smalley, Keith Hendrick, Steven Kennedy,
John O. Ring, and James E. McCubbin Jr. The agency filed an amended
complaint later, adding defendant WebSource Media LP, a successor to
WebSource Media LLC.

FTC's Accusations

The defendants illegally billed thousands of customers, according to
the FTC.

The operation was a maze of interrelated companies directed by the
people named as defendants, the FTC said. The operation used
telemarketers to make cold calls to small businesses and nonprofits,
and offered a "free" 15-day trial of a Web site design. The customers
were told there was no charge or obligation and that the Web site
would be cancelled automatically if it was not approved by them.

Whether the customers agreed or not to be billed after the trial,
their phone bills were often charged. When consumers called to dispute
the charges, the operators told them they had "verification
recordings" of an employee authorizing the charges.

The FTC said the operation is typical of fraudulent Web cramming
operations -- by using sales pitches to employees who frequently lack
authority to make commitments for their employers and failing to
effectively notify consumers that a Web site has been set up. The
operators repeatedly changed the names of their companies to avoid
detection by telephone companies they rely on to bill consumers and to
evade scrutiny from law enforcers, the FTC said.

Copyright 2006 PC World Communications, Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

Also please visit:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #545, September 8, 2006
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:12:34 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca
Number 545: September 8, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:
** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** MITEL NETWORKS: www.mitel.com/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

************************************************************
IN THIS ISSUE:

** Telcos File Deferral Account Proposals
** Rogers to Intro Blackberry Pearl in Canada
** Toronto Hydro Launches Civic Wi-Fi
** Carriers Divide on VoIP Ruling
** BCE Further Reduces Globemedia Stake
** Syniverse Gets Canadian WNP Contract
** Shareholders Approve Alcatel-Lucent Merger
** Telus Announces $600M in Broadband Spending
** Wireless Subscriber Growth Slows
** SuperNet Revenue Boosts Axia Results
** RamTelecom Opens Calgary Office
** Rogers Replaces Bell as Maple Leafs Sponsor
** Phonetime Buys Thomas Hook
** More IXPL Routes Deregulated
** Telus Wholesale ADSL Rates Under Scrutiny
** Payphone Competitors Can Get Volume Discounts
** Koles Named to Head CSI
** Fall Telecom Event Lineup

TELCOS FILE DEFERRAL ACCOUNT PROPOSALS: As ordered by the CRTC in
Telecom Decision 2006-9 (see Telecom Update #517, 536), Canada's major
telcos have filed proposals to spend their accumulated deferral account
funds to expand rural broadband coverage and to improve access by
disabled persons to telecom services. Proposals include:

** Bell Canada and Bell Aliant: $455 million over five years
   to extend broadband services to 264 remote communities in
   Ontario and Quebec (54 in the first year). No broadband
   expansion in the Atlantic provinces. Bell to spend $24
   million on services for the disabled, Bell Aliant
   $410,000.

** Telus: $152 million over five years to extend broadband
   backbone facilities to 306 remote communities in BC,
   Alberta, and eastern Quebec. Retail high-speed service
   rollout deferred for three years to allow other ISPs to
   enter. Wholesale rates will not undercut SuperNet rates in
   Alberta. $8 million on services to the disabled.

** SaskTel: No broadband expansion, $1.5 million on services
   for the disabled.

** MTS: no proposal, citing uncertainties due to outstanding
   filings and appeals that will affect timing and amounts in
   the deferral accounts.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2006/8638/c12_200602708.htm

ROGERS TO INTRO BLACKBERRY PEARL IN CANADA: Rogers Wireless will start
selling Research In Motion's much ballyhooed new smartphone in Canada
next month. The Blackberry Pearl, unveiled this week, is described as
"one of the world's smallest and lightest smartphones." It includes a
phone, email, digital camera, MP3 player, video player, and an
expandable memory slot.

** Retail pricing has not been announced, but published
   reports say that U.S. carrier T-mobile will sell the Pearl
   for $199 on a two-year contract.

TORONTO HYDRO LAUNCHES CIVIC WI-FI: Municipally owned Toronto Hydro
Telecom has launched the first phase of its "One Zone" public Wi-Fi
service, covering six square kilometres in downtown Toronto. Service
at speeds up to 7 Mbps is free until March 6 and will be $29/month
thereafter. (See Telecom Update #538)

CARRIERS DIVIDE ON VoIP RULING: Predictably, incumbent and competitive
telecom carriers had opposite reactions to the CRTC ruling maintaining
the VoIP regulatory regime (see Telecom Update #544). Some cablecos
also criticized the review of market share thresholds. Among the
comments:

** "Helps ensure continued and sustainable competition" - MTS
    Allstream

** "Promotes real choice and benefits for consumers" - Shaw

** "The government keeps changing those rules in the middle
    of the process" - Rogers

** "The CRTC is incapable of aligning the regulatory
    framework to current ... realities" - SaskTel

** "Clearly ignores the government's directive" - Coalition
    for Competitive Telecom

** "This is now an issue for the government" - BCE

BCE FURTHER REDUCES GLOBEMEDIA STAKE: Bell Globemedia has issued new
shares to finance part of its $1.4 billion purchase of CHUM Ltd. BCE
declined to participate, so its stake in Globemedia has fallen to 15%
from 20%. (See Telecom Update #544)

SYNIVERSE GETS CANADIAN WNP CONTRACT: Canada's ten largest cellcos have
contracted with Syniverse Technologies of Tampa Florida to provide
clearinghouse capabilities for the implementation of wireless number
portability, scheduled for introduction on March 14, 2007.

** Syniverse, which provides similar services for most U.S.
   wireless carriers, will act as a centralized service
   bureau, handling the exchange of porting messages between
   the carriers and the Number Portability Administration
   Center.

SHAREHOLDERS APPROVE ALCATEL-LUCENT MERGER: Shareholders of both Alcatel
and Lucent have voted to approve the two manufacturers' US$10.7 billion 
merger, which will create a company called Alcatel Lucent.

TELUS ANNOUNCES $600M IN BROADBAND SPENDING: Telus says that by the end
of 2009 it will spend $600 million to install advanced Internet gear and
bring fibre closer to customer homes in 38 communities in BC, Alberta,
and eastern Quebec. This plan is in addition to spending proposed in the
telco's deferral account filing.

WIRELESS SUBSCRIBER GROWTH SLOWS: Canadian cellcos added a net 337,000
subscribers in the second quarter, 17.7% fewer than a year ago. It was
the first quarter of slowed growth since 1Q 2005.

http://tinyurl.com/oq83u

SUPERNET REVENUE BOOSTS AXIA RESULTS: Axia NetMedia revenues for the
year ended June 30 were $52.7 million, 40% higher than the previous 
year. Axia said the gain was due to the flow of revenues from Alberta
SuperNet. Net income doubled to $16.1 million.

RAMTELECOM OPENS CALGARY OFFICE: RamTelecom, an Ottawa-based satellite
services provider, has opened an office in Calgary and a new network
operations centre in Ottawa.

ROGERS REPLACES BELL AS MAPLE LEAFS SPONSOR: Maple Leaf Sports &
Entertainment, which is 15% owned by Bell GlobeMedia, has chosen
Rogers Communications as its lead sponsor, replacing Bell Canada. Bell
said MLSE had presented a proposal, but Bell decided to take a
"different direction."

PHONETIME BUYS THOMAS HOOK: Mississauga-based Phonetime Inc. a provider
of prepaid phone cards and wholesale long distance services, has
acquired the 9,000 customers served by Thomas Hook Communications, a New
Westminster company that provides LD services to Canada's Romanian
community.

** Hook's call centre, which is located in Romania, will continue to
   be owned and operated by the existing management team.

MORE IXPL ROUTES DEREGULATED: CRTC Telecom Decision 2006-54 forbears
from regulating additional private line routes in Bell Aliant, Bell
Canada, and Telus territories.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-54.htm

TELUS WHOLESALE ADSL RATES UNDER SCRUTINY: CRTC Telecom Decision
2006-55 says Telus' wholesale ADSL Access to Individual Line service
is significantly more expensive than Bell's equivalent service, and
orders Telus to file new costing information. The Commission makes the
current rates interim, so any changes can be retroactive to September
8.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-55.htm

PAYPHONE COMPETITORS CAN GET VOLUME DISCOUNTS: CRTC Telecom Decision
2006-55 rejects competitive payphone providers' application to freeze
payphone access line rates at 2002 levels, but says incumbent telcos
must offer them the same contract terms and volume discounts available
to individual business line customers.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-56.htm

KOLES NAMED TO HEAD CSI: Steven Koles, formerly with AOL, Group
Telecom, and Telus, has been named President and CEO of CSI Wirless, a
Calgary-based GPS manufacturer. He replaces interim CEO Michael Lang,
who continues as Chairman.

FALL TELECOM EVENT LINEUP: Among the major telecom events planned during
the next two months:

** Enterprise Networks 2006, October 24-25, Toronto,
   sponsored by Angus Dortmans Associates,

http://www.enterprisenetworks.ca

** CTCA Fall 2006 National Conference, September 29-30,
   Ottawa, Canadian Telecommunications Consultants
   Association, http://www.ctca.ca <http://www.ctca.ca/

** ICCM Canada, October 23-25, Toronto, Questex Media,
http://www.iccmnewsline.com 

** Telecom Laureate Awards, October 16, Toronto, Canada's
   Telecom Hall of Fame, 

http://www.telecomhall.ca  or http://www.voice2.ca 

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE
E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There
are two formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the
   World Wide Web late Friday afternoon each week=
   at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.
   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:
      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com=20
   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send=20
   an e-mail message to:
      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see http://www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further
information, including permission to reprint or reproduce, please
e-mail jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from
sources which we believe to be reliable, but Angus
TeleManagement makes no warranties or representations
whatsoever regarding accuracy, completeness, or adequacy.

Opinions expressed are based on interpretation of available
information, and are subject to change. If expert advice on
the subject matter is required, the services of a competent
professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

From: FreedomFireCom <melemm@cognisurf.com>
Subject: Evaluating Bandwidth Solutions For Your Business
Date: 7 Sep 2006 16:57:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Below are a series of articles on evaluating bandwidth solutions for
your business.  You'll notice some similarities in format and the
factors focused on.  Otherwise ... each is specific to the bandwidth
type noted.

A brief overview is as follows:

"Looking for bandwidth? That can be a daunting and frustrating task
even in the best of situations. There's lots to consider in order to
make the right decision for your needs. Below you'll find some help
when evaluating XXXXXXXX. Factors covered include Technology, Speed,
Description, Application, Pros, Cons, and Cost."

*  Evaluating Bandwidth Choices-OC3 vs OC12 vs OC48
http://ezinearticles.com/?Evaluating-Bandwidth-Choices-OC3-vs-OC12-vs-OC48&id=100896

*  Evaluating Bandwidth Choices-Fractional DS3 vs DS3
http://ezinearticles.com/?Evaluating-Bandwidth-Choices-Fractional-DS3-vs-DS3&id=100893

*  Evaluating Bandwidth Choices-Fractional T-1 vs T1
http://ezinearticles.com/?Evaluating-Bandwidth-Choices-Fractional-T-1-vs-T1&id=100892

*  Evaluating Bandwidth Choices - Frame Relay vs VPN (Voice Protocol
Network)
http://ezinearticles.com/?Evaluating-Bandwidth-Choices---Frame-Relay-vs-VPN&id=100464

*  Evaluating Bandwidth Choices - ADSL vs SDSL
http://ezinearticles.com/?Evaluating-Bandwidth-Choices---ADSL-vs-SDSL&id=100451

I hope you find some useful information for your business decisions.

Michael Lemm
FreedomFire Communications
"Helping YOUR Business....DO Business"
http://DS3-Bandwidth.com
http://Broadband-Nation.blogspot.com

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address?
Date: 8 Sep 2006 08:12:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I understand now the phoneco offers reverse information, that is, given
a phone number they'll return the person's name and address.

For personal security, many people don't want their home address
readilly available, but they still want to be listed in the book so
people can find and call them.  I called the phoneco to ask if
addresses could be deleted or made generic (ie street name only, no
house number, or town only) and they said no except for very special
cases (ie a cop). Apartment dwellers can have the building address shown,
not their apartment number.

It seems to me the phoneco should allow no addresses freely if that's
what the customer wants.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 08, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri,  8 Sep 2006 11:39:34 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 08, 2006
********************************

Mobile Operators Set to Lose US$6.4 bil. VAT Claim on UMTS Licences
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19762?11228

     The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has published an opinion that
     goes against European mobile operators: claim for refunds of up
     to 5 billion euro (US$6.4 billion) in value-added tax (VAT) on
     UMTS licences. The operators argue that under EU tax law, they
     should be allowed to reclaim VAT payments.  Significance: The ECJ
     is ...

Amazon.com Launches TV, Movie Service
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19757?11228

     SEATTLE -- Amazon.com Inc. launched a digital video downloading
     service Thursday, ending months of speculation that the Internet
     retailer would be getting into the online TV and movie business.
     The service, dubbed Amazon Unbox, will offer thousands of television
     shows, movies and other videos from more than 30 studios and ...

FortuNet Gets OK for Mobile Gambling
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19754?11228

     LAS VEGAS -- FortuNet Inc., which makes wireless gaming machines
     for casinos and other gambling establishments, won approval from
     the State Gaming Control Board to become an operator of mobile
     gambling devices, a company spokesman said Thursday.  The Las
     Vegas-based company now faces a vote in the next few weeks at the
     Nevada ...

Nokia Strengthens Ties with Yahoo!
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19748?11228

     Nokia is making a deeper commitment to Yahoo! by further
     integrating Yahoo! Search into its Nokia Mobile Search
     application.  As part of the agreement, Yahoo! will provide Web
     and image search results in more than 10 languages on a wide
     variety of Nokia devices, which will give consumers real-time
     access to information and content,...

Verizon Asks FCC to Undo Unbundling
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19745?11228

     Verizon Communications Inc.&nbsp;late Wednesday asked the Federal
     Communications Commission (FCC) to excuse it from sharing its DS1
     and DS3 loop and transport facilities with competing voice
     providers, especially cable companies.  Verizon wants relief from
     its &quot;dominant carrier&quot; responsibilities in six major
     metro areas ...

Winning the Compliance Game
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19742?11228

     Looking for tips on how to ace your next regulatory audit?  The
     Compliance Security Council, made up of the Institute of Internal
     Auditors, the Computer Security Institute, and Symantec, has been
     tracking what's working and what's not, says James
     Hurley, executive director of research for the Security
     Compliance Council and a ...

RIM Polishes Its Pearl
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19740?11228

     Research In Motion Ltd. (RIM)&nbsp;has made its boldest stride
     into the consumer market yet with the long-anticipated $199
     smartphone called 'Pearl'. The firm unveiled the phone this week
     in downtown New York with cellular partner T-Mobile USA.  The
     operator will start to sell the phone in the U.S. this coming
     Tuesday ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:37:21 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Alcatel-Lucent Deal Gets Green Light From Shareholders


USTelecom dailyLead
September 8, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eqzgfDtusXbOgXJHbM

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Alcatel-Lucent deal gets green light from shareholders
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Pipex in deals with C&W, IDT
* Amazon launches TV show, movie download service
* NFL, Yahoo! to stream football games
* Telmex to go wireless for last mile
* Juniper adds IPTV testing to list of services
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Creating International Networks to Support Your Expansion
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Analysis: Qualcomm's still out front
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* AOL ramps up VoIP efforts
* Report indicates strong VoIP market
* Intrado tests location technology for mobile VoIP
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Pretexting a persistent threat as carriers' ramp up protection efforts
DIVERSIONS
* Dorothy Harmsen, 91, a Creator of the Jolly Rancher Candy Line, Dies
* Luggage So Luxe It's Tailor Made
* Equal-Opportunity Offender Plays Anti-Semitism for Laughs
* 36 Hours in Jackson, Wyo.
* The Unsold Warhol

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eqzgfDtusXbOgXJHbM

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:57:26 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone


davidk <davidkocieniewski@verizon.net> wrote:

> My name is David Kocieniewski, I'm a New York Times reporter
> researching a story about the development and history of the special
> information tone.

A simple wiki search found this to start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_information_tone

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Discovering Where a Number Is
Date: 8 Sep 2006 08:06:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Carl Moore wrote:

> I happened to come across a recent MSNBC TV program regarding some
> newsmakers.  As part of that, I saw an item on Scott Peterson
> (convicted of murder of pregnant wife, Laci, in California).  So there
> was the part about having Amber Frey as a mistress, and Scott
> P. claimed to be calling her from Europe and supposedly gave a
> telephone number which Amber found to be in Modesto, California.  Does
> anyone else recall the program I am writing about?

Frankly, I have no idea why this case made national news.  I can
understand it being local news, but not national and definitely
dragged through cable news channels ad nauseum.

Anyway, to find the town associated with a given area code and
exchange, call your long distance operator or Information.  This used
to be free, but now they may charge you a $1.00 or so fee.  There may
be websites to do this, but they might not be accurate.

------------------------------

From: GlowingBlueMist <nobody@invalid.com>
Subject: Re: Need Tap Into Telco Line
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:35:50 -0500
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source


news@absamail.co.za wrote:

> My telephone line goes out via the PABX of a party who I believe is
> listening in. We have a legal dispute, and I want to hear what they
> are saying too.

> I have access to the tag-block with their pair and mine.  How would I
> best hear their conversations ?

> My first thought is to just temporarily connect my pair to theirs,
> observing the polarity, and while leaving mine on-hook, just tap-off
> my line into an amplifier, which I can hear while I'm working.

> A second refinement, would be to use capacitive coupling to their
> pair.

> I need to terminate my side with a high impedance, so that the
> capacitive coupling can also have a high impedance.  So that it
> becomes insignificant when I receive or make a call.

> If I remove my handset, so that only the audio amplifier terminates my
> line, during 'listening in', would it work ?

>  And then by just connecting my handset and/or modem could I expect to
> operate without significant cross-talk to the looters line ?

> Thanks for any info/feedback,

"James bLond".

Check with your attorney about the legality of what you want to do
before you pursue this but you should be able to get everything you
need to accomplish this at http://sandman.com/.

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Need Tap Into Telco Line
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:32:07 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


news@absamail.co.za said on that big USENET thingie:

> My telephone line goes out via the PABX of a party who I believe is
> listening in. We have a legal dispute, and I want to hear what they
> are saying too.

> I have access to the tag-block with their pair and mine.  How would I
> best hear their conversations ?

> My first thought is to just temporarily connect my pair to theirs,
> observing the polarity, and while leaving mine on-hook, just tap-off
> my line into an amplifier, which I can hear while I'm working.

Err ... you might want to check into any local regulations
regarding all that.   There may be legal issues ...


Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:21:45 -0400
From: Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies


Paul wrote:

> mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote in
> news:telecom25.321.7@telecom-digest.org: 

>> The reason for having the telephone separate from the computer
>> network (and even the electric power connection) is so that it will
>> still work when the others don't.

Their backup battery must be dead. Let 'em know.

> while the other line, from the cable TV service (not VOIP), keeps
> working.

Sweet!

> Logic tells me it should be vice-versa.

Paul

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies
Date: 8 Sep 2006 10:10:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Paul wrote:

> Even though there is supposed to be standby power all the way, when I
> have a power outage at home, the POTS line from Verizon fails within
> about 10 seconds (probably at the SLIC across the street), while the
> other line, from the cable TV service (not VOIP), keeps working.

How often do you have power failures at home to observe this failrue?
Your battery TV works but the phone doesn't?  I assume you're using a
standard plain phone, not a cordless.

I am really surprised that is the case and as far as I know, that
should be extremely rare.  Have you reported that to the phone
company?  What is their response?

mc wrote:

> The reason for having the telephone separate from the computer network (and
> even the electric power connection) is so that it will still work when the
> others don't.

> Imagine being completely incommunicado during a computer network failure.

That is very true.

The telephone network has 100 years of experience behind it.  That
means they have made their mistakes over time and learned from them,
from dealing with weather and storms to equipment shortages to
untrained technicians and fires in C.O.s.  In the 1970s they had
equipment failures and "blue box phreaks" and learned to deal with
that as well by separating control signals from the voice channel.  I
don't think IP has any protection like that whatsoever, given all the
crap that flows through "filters".

Short of everyone lifting their handset at once or a critical cable or
C.O. being destroyed (which happens), the system is extremely
reliable.  All components (except the phone sets) are built to very
heavy standards.

The IP computer network is new and constantly evolving.  It is full of
malicious attacks and sabatoge that are a long way to being resolved.
It is full of bugs.  It crashes all the time from numerous software
and hardware failures.  A few months ago my employer was completely
knocked out by sabotage (an email virus).  That happens to people all
the time.  You want me to depend on something like that?

To suggest we abandon this network is ludicrous and irresponsible.  The
IP geeks have a long way to go toward reliability and have their heads
in the sand if they believe otherwise.

Some proponents of this sort of thing are probably young techies who
have little experience in the real world out of the classroom.  Others
are businesspeople who want to be the first to sell a new
service/product at a high markup regardless of its technical merits.

------------------------------

Subject: In an Ideal, Perfect World ...
Date: Fri,  8 Sep 2006 13:47:51 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


I would -- like many other folks around here -- have only the latest,
most modern, effecient computer equipment. In real life practice, I
have only very old, antiquated, slow-as-molasses machines, running Win
98 in many cases, or Win 2000 for my 'best' machine; also Linux shares
a hard drive with Win 2000 on that machine.

In real life practice, raising a few hundred extra dollars for such a
purchase is beyond my means, living as I do on Uncle Sugar's dole each
month, and the money goes direct to the bank, which in turn pays the
various creditors -- my monthly mortgage payment, the gas, electric,
phone and cable bills -- direct from whatever Uncle Sugar provides for
me, and the little bit of leftover comes to my hot little hands around
the fourth Wednesday of each month. Allowance is also made for the
lady who brings around my food each weekday; the lady who comes twice
weekly to clean up the house; my helper Raymond who comes to 'look in'
on me every day, etc.

I would not have what junky computer stuff I have now had I not
already had it (for the most part) prior to my illness setting in back
in 1999-2000. That should sort of tell you where I am at. I got the
machine which has Win 2000/Linux on it in 2001 as the result of a
_mistake_ by Social Security.  One day I called to check the balance
in my account, and the bank claimed a thousand dollars more that
expected: another deposit had been made by Social Security. A deposit
made by _mistake_ by SSI. After about six months, SSI discovered the
error and needless to say wanted their money back; it was too late, I
had already spent the money on the computer and related peripherals.

Hmmm, said Uncle ... admitting it was their fault, SSI agreed to
accept monthly payments to get the return of the overpayment, so for
the next several months, SSI made a monthly deduction from _my_ check
to pay for _their_ mistake. What had been at best a tight budget while
living on a fixed income became even tighter.

To get to the point of this, anyone with older, excessive and unused
computer equipment no longer needed is asked to donate it to me, if
they wish to do so. Nothing fancy, nothing fast, just a working
terminal which can be connected to a router and my internet cable
connection. Laptop or desktop PC/terminal needed, Windows or
Unix/Linux based preferred.  If you can help, please write to me as
soon as possible.  Ditto my cellphone, which has seen better days.

Thanks,

PAT

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #324
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Sep  9 17:56:06 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 640F02253; Sat,  9 Sep 2006 17:56:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #325
Message-Id: <20060909215606.640F02253@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat,  9 Sep 2006 17:56:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:00:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 325

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Telecom Founder Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion/Fraud (Matt Apuzzo, AP)
    Ebbers Ordered to Report to Prison (NYSSCPA Staff)
    Small Bidders Blame FCC Rule Changes For Auction Woes (Reuters News Wire)
    CBS Concerned About Profanity on the 9/11 Documentary (Jeremy Pelofsky)
    Internet Prostitution: Women Use Craigslist to Meet 'Dates' (AP News Wire)
    Cute Cingular Junk Mail (Paul Robinson)
    Re: Today's Cell Phone Companies? (Paul Robinson)
    Re: Touch Tone Grocery Shopping - Promise Never Realized? (Paul Robinson)
    Re: Cybercrime Treaty Hailed as Potential Violation of Privacy (P Robinson)
    Re: Newest Airport Regulations Cause Considerable Delay (Paul Robinson)
    Re: Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme (Danny Burstein)
    Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies (Paul)
    Re: Discovering Where a Number Is (Carl Moore)
    Re: Discovering Where a Number Is (Gene S. Berkowitz)
    Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones? (Paul Robinson)
    Re: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address? (Sam Spade)
    Re: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address? (annie)
    Re: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address? (bv124@aol.com)
    Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers - VoIP (Paul Robinson)
    Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts (Dan Lanciani)    

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:02:35 -0500
From: Matt Apuzzo <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Telecom Founder Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion/Fraud


by MATT APUZZO  Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Telecommunications entrepreneur Walter Anderson pleaded
guilty to tax evasion and fraud Friday in connection with what
authorities said was the nation's largest ever criminal tax case.

Anderson was indicted in 2005 on charges he evaded $200 million in
federal and local taxes. Prosecutors said Anderson used offshore
corporations and bank accounts to hide income from tax collectors.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of tax evasion and one count of fraud
Friday. He admitted hiding hundreds of millions of dollars in income
from the IRS and Washington D.C. tax collectors during 1998 and 1999.

Under a plea deal with prosecutors, he faces up to 10 years in prison.

Anderson started a long distance telecommunications business in the
1980s as the industry was being deregulated. When his first company,
Mid-Atlantic Telecom, merged with another company in 1992, Anderson
formed corporations in the British Virgin Islands to hide the income,
prosecutors said.

Authorities said Anderson used other offshore corporations to disguise
his ownership in other telecommunications companies that earned more
than $450 million between 1995 and 1999.

Anderson, who allegedly didn't file federal income tax returns from
1987 to 1993, has been held without bail since his arrest. Prosecutors
say he owes $170 million in federal taxes and $40 million in
Washington income taxes.

In court documents, the government said Anderson could be linked to at
least seven aliases and that officials seized from his apartment
forged identification and manuals detailing ways to create fake
identification and hide from authorities.

Among them were "Poof! How to Disappear and Create a New Identity" and
"The ID Forger: Homemade Birth Certificates and Other Documents
Explained," the documents said.

Among the taxes allegedly owed to Washington are use taxes, equivalent
to sales taxes, on art, jewelry and wine. The indictment alleges that
Anderson bought a painting by Salvador Dali and several paintings by
Rene Magritte, an 18-karat gold bracelet and more than $47,000 in fine
wines, then had them shipped to a Virginia address to avoid Washington
taxes.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:06:25 -0500
From: NYSSCPA Staff <nysscpa@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Ebbers Ordered to Report to Prison


NEW YORK -- A federal judge ordered the former chief executive of
WorldCom, Bernard J. Ebbers, who was convicted of orchestrating an $11
billion accounting fraud, to report to federal prison on Sept. 26 to
begin his 25-year sentence, Reuters reported.

Ebbers must report to an institution to be designated by the Bureau of
Prisons, according to the order dated Tuesday from Judge Barbara S.
Jones of Federal District Court in Manhattan, Reuters reported.

In March 2005, a jury convicted Ebbers of nine counts of conspiracy,
securities fraud and other crimes that led to the telephone
company's July 2002 bankruptcy, Reuters reported.

He had remained free on bail while appealing his conviction and
sentence, but in July a three-judge panel of the United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed both, Reuters reported.


-- NYSSCPA.org News Staff

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:04:17 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Small Bidders Blame FCC Rule Changes For Auction Woes


The results thus far of the FCC's ongoing advanced wireless services
(AWS) auction offer 'immediate evidence' that the Commission's new
rules for smaller would-be wireless licensees, known as designated
entities (DEs), are 'flawed' and have led to a 'collapse' of the
'historic level of small business success' in spectrum auctions, DE
interests have told a federal appeals court in a case that, if
successful, could nullify the results of the AWS auction, which has
garnered more than $13 billion in net high bids to date.

In a brief filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit (Philadelphia), Council Tree Communications, Inc.,

Bethel Native Corp., and the Minority Media and Telecommunications
Council argued that the FCC's 'eleventh-hour revisions' to rules
governing DE participation in spectrum auctions prior to the opening
of the AWS auction violated the Administrative Procedure Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, section 309(j) (promoting opportunities
for DEs) of the 1934 Communications Act, and section 257 (market-entry
barriers) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 12:33:41 -0500
From: Jeremy Pelofsky <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: CBS Concerned About Profanity on the 9/11 Documentary


So, they will show it on the web
By Jeremy Pelofsky

CBS Corp. said on Saturday it would broadcast the documentary "9/11"
on the Internet as well as the airwaves after several affiliates said
they would delay or forgo the award-winning film because it includes
profanity.

The documentary was produced by French filmmakers Gedeon and Jules
Naudet and retired New York firefighter James Hanlon and has aired
twice without incurring fines by U.S. regulators charged with
enforcing broadcast decency standards.

CBS said affiliates that cover about 10 percent of the United States
had decided not broadcast the program or would show it late at night,
citing concerns they could be fined for airing profanity, primarily by
firefighters during the crisis, before 10 p.m.

The American Family Association, which describes itself as a Christian
organization promoting traditional values, has called on CBS stations
to forgo or delay the "9/11" broadcast.

"The online streaming of this broadcast will allow viewers in those
markets to see the Peabody Award-winning special," CBS said in a
statement. The network will air warnings about graphic language.

The film is scheduled to air on Sunday evening at 8 p.m.

Another major U.S. network, ABC, was making last-minute changes to its
two-part September 11-linked miniseries "The Path to 9/11" to air on
Sunday and Monday. Former President Bill Clinton, former aides and
congressional Democrats have lodged complaints that the film
inaccurately suggests Clinton was inattentive to the Islamic militant
threat that led to the September 11 attacks.

The film to air on CBS, narrated by actor Robert De Niro, was compiled
using footage shot inside the north tower of the World Trade Center in
Manhattan after it was hit by a hijacked airliner. No actual carnage
is shown.

An FCC spokeswoman has said the agency only acts on complaints it
receives and the historical context would likely be considered if any
complaints were lodged.

The FCC last year ruled that profanity during ABC's 2004 broadcast of
the World War Two drama "Saving Private Ryan" did not violate decency
rules despite complaints.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 12:37:42 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Internet Prostitution: Women Use Craigslist to Meet 'Dates'


12 arrested for prostitution ads on Web

Police in Bucks County have charged 12 women after an investigation
into prostitutes who allegedly have been advertising on the Web site
Craigslist.

After police received a tip in August about alleged prostitutes
advertising on the site, investigators called cell phone numbers in
local listings that advertised "GFEs" (girlfriend experiences)
asking for payment in "ro$e$" or "125 donations."

The undercover investigators agreed to meet the women at motels, and
almost all 12 were arrested within two minutes, he said.

Several of the women who were arrested had brought along their
boyfriends, and five men were arrested on drug charges, police said.

Similar sting operations have led to prostitution charges against women 
in states including Maryland, New York, Oregon and New Hampshire.

Craigslist spokeswoman Sue MacTavish Best said the site cooperates
with law enforcement and has a flagging system that allows users to
bring prohibited content to the company's attention so it can be
removed. She insisted the purpose of Craigslist was not to promote
prostitution or anything else illegal.


Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 04:15:57 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Cute Cingular Junk Mail
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


My brother recieved an ad in the mail for free delivery of a pair of
Cingular cell phones.  One of those "you have been pre-qualified
because we bought your info from a credit reporting company but we
might change our mind after we discover we can charge you more by
claiming your credit isn't as good as we thought it was" offers.

Currently we have one cell phone -- mine -- and due to my disability I
don't go out much, so my sister borrows it from time-to-time.
Technically it's a Sprint PCS phone rather than a cell phone, but you
get the idea.

So when she saw this offer she wrote me a recommendation to take it
and get rid of the Sprint PCS phone, since it would give us two phones
on a shared minutes plan (or at least I imagine that was the case).
Since she basically would be paying for the service, if she wants to
get it it's no skin off my nose since it's her money.

The ad mentioned that it's a camera phone, which closes up "clamshell"
style, which means you don't have the problem of accidentally dialing
a number if you forget to lock the phone.  This was the feature she
most liked.

It mentions all the features: 2 free LG CG225 camera phones with free
delivery; VGA Camera with 4x digital zoom; Multimedia messaging
service; text messaging; net browser; address book; speed dial;
ringtones can be MP3s; org tools like alarm clock, calculator, world
clock and more.  And, of course, the $175 termination fee, if you
cancel any time before two years.  And that means that even if you
cancelled it at 23 months they'd still want the $175 early termination
fee!

I've had mobile service since about two weeks before the September
11th tragedy so having to take a two-year contract really isn't a
problem.

If it wasn't for the fact Sprint's service where I live, indoors,
sucks so badly I might simply consider asking them to match Cingular's
offer to stay with them.  But I don't know if Cingular's service is
any better indoors here in Arlington, Virginia than Sprint.

Service features include caller id, waiting, 3-way, unlimited
mobile-to-mobile minutes on some plans, voicemail, rollover of unused
minutes, and no roaming fees.

Having gotten burned a couple of times by stuff I've bought from ads
on infomercials where I didn't check the whole price, I noticed
something.

I found it very cute that in all the advertising copy, with the
mentions of prequalification, free delivery, 30-day return privelege,
and so on, there is NOT ONE WORD about how much the monthly service is
going to cost, not even a rough estimate!

I have a theory about pricing of products or services.  When a company
won't even give you an idea of what the product costs, especially on a
monthly service plan, it's a clear admission they *know* they are
ripping you off and if you knew what the product was going to cost
you, you might not take it.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 04:30:35 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Today's Cell Phone Companies?
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Comments on telephone service quality and customer service would be
> appreciated.  (I do realize there are regional differences and some
> places may do much better than others.)

I live in Arlington, Virginia, about 4 miles from the Pentagon.
Originally I had one of those plans that had the usual 200 or so
minutes and unlimited night and weekend minutes, this was back about
two weeks before September 11th occurred.

 From that point on, I basically could never get a connection during
the "free" periods except maybe 1 in 10 tries.  During the part where
I had metered minutes, I was *always* able to get a call to go
through.

I couldn't really tell whether this was the usual and customary
performance due to classic overselling of capacity, or an unusual
condition triggered by overloading, perhaps due to damage to circuits
from the terrorist attack, or because people were using the phones a
lot more than they were before it happened.

Being dissatisfied with that carrier I decided to switch to Sprint.

I have a $39.95 plan that is 200/1800 minutes, the 200 being 7am to
7pm Monday thru Friday, the rest being the rest of the month.  Or it
might be 2800 minutes, I don't remember off the top of my head.  Well,
technically, if you used up all of the over 1000 minutes then it would
use the 200 minute allotment, but it was always the other way around,
I'd often use up all of the 200 minute allotment and then some, while
still having over 1000 minutes left on the other side.

Hell, if it could simply have absorbed the excess minutes on a 10/1
scale, I'd still never have run an overage.

What I have found is that Sprint's service is okay outdoors, but sucks
when I try to use it indoors.  Sometimes if I'm close to a window it
might work, and sometimes it doesn't.

I want to check on the phone used by a neighbor, because theirs not
only works indoors, it even works *in the basement*.  I need to find
out what network they're using!

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Have you seen that television
commercial for Cingular (I think?) where a man is sitting on top of
a file cabinet, scrunched down, right next to a window with a cellular
phone in his outstretched hand? He says, "It used to be this was the
only place in my office where I could use my cell phone; then I 
switched to Cingular(?) from Brand X and now I can make calls all over
the place." Whereupon he jumps down from the file cabinet in the
corner by the window, answers an incoming call and walks away.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:00:18 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Touch Tone Grocery Shopping - Promise Never Realized?
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


R. T. Wurth wrote:

> 6.) Stores were already required to put in electronic card-based
> payment systems as part of food stamp conversion from coupons to
> electronic cards, (either convert or lose all the business of food
> stamp customers) so none of the infrastructure costs are attributable
> to credit cards.  (Note to non-US readers: food stamps are an
> agriculture subsidy/welfare program, whereby the poor receive
> coupons/electronic credits that can only be spent at qualified food
> merchants for the purchase of qualified foods (no liquor, candy or
> soda) processed in US factories from US agricultural products.)

About ten or twelve years ago when I was between jobs I qualified for 
"food stamps" which then -- in Montgomery County, Maryland -- consists 
basically of a special type of ATM card which could be used at any 
grocery store or supermarket in the state.  Neither the card nor the 
purchasing rules prohibit you from buying candy or soda.  Basically, if 
you can eat it and it's not cooked, it's legal to buy it using food 
stamps.  The only food you can't buy is anything sold as heated for 
immediate use.

This means you can buy candy, soda, cereal, milk or TV dinners.  You 
could not, however, purchase toothpaste or baking soda.

In fact, there was some serious anger a few years ago because some
couple in New York City was buying very expensive caviar using food
stamps and reselling it for more than the purchase price.  (Why anyone
would pay more than the cash price in a store is beyond me, but that's
what the article said.)  It turns out that once you purchase the food,
it's yours to do with as you please.  It is a criminal offense to sell
food stamps or to sell access to one's public benefits, but it is
perfectly legal to resell food you've bought with public benefits.

In fact, because of federal law regarding purchases using federal funds, 
if you buy food using a public subsidy program like food stamps, the 
sale is tax exempt, same as if you were someone with Diplomatic 
Immunity.  So it actually gives someone on food stamps an extra 5% more 
purchasing power (presuming your state's food tax is 5%).

The particular food program that *does* restrict what you can buy is
the "Women Infants and Children" or "WIC" program which has certain
restrictions, usually to certain types of baby formula and other such
things.

Now, I only qualified for a month because once I was back working I
didn't bother to send in the paperwork to continue to get benefits.
Which was fine because all I was interested in was short term
assistance.  And this was before they instituted the five-year
lifetime limit on welfare benefits for people who are not disabled.

I'd like to mention to Pat, also, that if you're receiving Social
Security Disability, if you do not have a large amount of assets, you
may also be elligible for food stamps as well; check with your county
Human Services office (or whatever is the Politically Correct word for
"Welfare Department" these days).

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Thanks for thinking of me. I have tried
to get food stamps (both federal and state/county-wide). The federal
program depends on state officials detirmining your eligibility,
although if eligible, the money for same come from the feds. I am 
getting Social Security Disability, but under the 'special rule' they
have for persons over 60 years of age considered 'permanently disabled'.
They pay me my full pension benefits 'as though' I was over 65. When I
in fact turn 65 in about a year or so, they will officially retire me
'on paper' as it were ... if I had been _under 60_ and disabled, they
would have paid me a lot less money for being disabled. They do not 
give me very much now (about poverty level, statistically) but if I
was younger than 60 it would be even less, believe me, and
'permanently disabled' only applies for seven years, then a physician's
recertification (a doctor employed by SSD, not your own doctor!) is
required. 

Montgomery County, Kansas has the same scheme you mentioned: a plastic
card good in ATM machines or grocery stores; swipe the card, enter
your PIN, etc, and the same restrictions: cold food (candy bars, cola?)
is okay, but no 'ready to eat' food (hot microwave sandwiches from
the 7-Eleven, etc). No beer, no cigarettes, etc. However if you receive 
'General Assistance' (in addition to food stamps) that extra allotment 
of money goes on the same ATM card, to be cashed out as desired. On
the 'food stamp' portion of the money, no cash back of more than one
dollar, but spend the 'General Assistance' portion of the money as you
desire (cash it out, then see your local dope dealer or whatever.) I
am NOT eligible for either 'food stamps' or General Assistance, and
the office manager for the state program here in Independence waves a
red flag whenever I go around his office. I think he hates me. I will
tell you why:

When I had my aneurysm in 1999, I was in a coma for about three
months, November 26, 1999 through about the middle of January, 2000,
plus another month of 'emergency rehabilitation'. 'Emergency' in this
instance means therapy to help me recover the simplest use of my body,
eating my food, using the toilet, etc. After I got out of the coma, I
was taken across the street to the Kansas Rehabilitation Center and
stayed there for a month. Finally, in March, 2000 I got to leave.

You ever seen a hospital bill for a three month stay; the bottom line
was right around three hundred _thousand_ dollars. The hospital
(Storemont Vale Medical Center in Topeka) obviously wanted to get
paid. I suggested to them collect it from State of Kansas under the
rules for indigent patients. There is a federal law which requires
hospitals which accept federal grants (and which one doesn't?) to
agree to write off a certain amount on indigent patients with a
catastrophic situation, or collect it from state welfare funds. 

Storemont Vale tried, but claimed State of Kansas refused to pay; it
went all the way up the line to an Administrative Law Judge who 
ruled _in my favor_ and ordered SRS (Social and Rehabilitative Services)
for Kansas to pay it. Montgomery County SRS said 'we think this is a
real kick in our butt -- err -- budget, more than a quarter million
dollars for this old man.'  Judge tells them he does not care, just
pay it, "and also pay for the ambulance which took Mr. Townson from
Fort Riley Army Base in Junction City to the nearest brain surgeon 
in Topeka about 100 miles east on I-70." US Army assigned two base
Military Police officers and a nurse to take me over to Topeka in the
back of a wagon; they all wanted to get paid as well, plus the local
hospital in Junction City who made the referral to Topeka. (I was not
in the Army, but no matter, I was on the base on official business
with a commercial tenant there when the aneurysm occurred.) All of
SRS's protests did no good, they wound up paying something more than
three hundred thousand dollars, between Storemont Vale, the US Army
base at Fort Riley, the local medic in Junction City, etc. 

The day I was finally released from the hospital in Topeka and came
back here to Independence, I got a letter in the mail from
Storemont-Vale which 'crossed in the mail' I guess, saying they had
made demand for payment from SRS, based on the judge's orders, etc.
I telephoned Ronnie Blaker, the local SRS manager, he agreed they
were going to obey the judge's order and pay all my bills, using what
they refer to as my 'spend down' allowance. I do not understand that
term. Ever since then, on the three or four occassions when I have
been in the Arco Building (where our SRS is located) if I happen to 
see Ronnie he _always_ gives me a very evil eye. I think the case
worker here has been told 'about the guy who sued us to make us pay for
his hospital stay in Topeka.'  _They_ claim (that even with my
pitiful federal allowance) I make too much money to receive food
stamps, general assistance, LIAPP (utility company allowance money) 
or any other services they offer. They did  agree to not take into
consideration Meals on Wheels, the Housekeeper service and that
stuff.  Anytime I have applied for _anything_ from them, and quote
the amount of money paid to me through Social Security, the very
first thing they do is call SSA and get them to verify the dollar
amount, then they tell me I am making too much money.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:11:10 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Cybercrime Treaty Hailed as Potential Violation of Privacy 
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


tedrichardson9925@sbcglobal.net wrote:

> Time will tell, but the implications are there. Hopefully, Alberto
> Gonzales is right when he said:

Yeah, right, the same man who said it was legal to torture suspects.
Fortunately the courts have decided otherwise.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 09:50:59 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Newest Airport Regulations Cause Considerable Delay, Inconvenience
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


> Former Amk president David Gunn -- who the Bush Adm fired
> despite being extremely well respected -- proposed a very
> cost efficient upgrading using conventional equipment.

This is one of those really wierd scenarios where you don't necessarily 
know who is worse, the typically incompetent and/or immoral Bush 
Administration, or Mr. Gunn, who, prior to his so called 'work' for 
Amtrak, was General Manager -- or should I say mangler -- of Washington 
D.C.'s WMATA metrorail system.  I suspect he snuck out of WMATA and over 
to Amtrak before it was discovered just how far he had run the place 
into the ground, a practice which has been reported in the Washington 
Post as being continued by those who succeeded him.

------------------------------

From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:50:37 UTC
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


In <telecom25.324.2@telecom-digest.org> Grant Gross, IDG
<idg@telecom-digest.org> writes:

[ snip of yet another phone bill scam operation ]

> Whether the customers agreed or not to be billed after the trial,
> their phone bills were often charged. When consumers called to dispute
> the charges, the operators told them they had "verification
> recordings" of an employee authorizing the charges.

It really is about time the telcos _stopped_ enabling (to use a polite
term) this garbage.

While there might (and that's a very iffy "might") be some equal
access issues preventing the telcos from ending all such third party
billing, they could, and should, _today_, not tomorrow, have the
follwoing clause in any such billing agreement:

 " if more than X  percent of customers complain
   about these charges, all such billing courtesies
   will be immediately frozen".

Yet they don't do this, even under pressure and after signing
stipulations with Attorneys General.

Maybe now that one of the more practical AGs (NYS's Spitzer) is likely
to become governor, we'll see some handcuffs brought out. That should
hopefully cut this down.

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: Paul <PSSawyer.does.not.want.spam@comcast.BAD.EXAMPLE.net>
Subject: Re: We Live in a World of Redundancies
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:28:48 UTC
Organization: Me


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote in
news:telecom25.324.13@telecom-digest.org:

> Paul wrote:

>> Even though there is supposed to be standby power all the way, when I
>> have a power outage at home, the POTS line from Verizon fails within
>> about 10 seconds (probably at the SLIC across the street), while the
>> other line, from the cable TV service (not VOIP), keeps working.

> How often do you have power failures at home to observe this failure?

Quite often, whenever there is a severe lightning storm or enough wind
to blow branches across power lines.

> Your battery TV works but the phone doesn't?  

Not TV, but "digital" telephone service provided by the cable service
(a second line); the TV cable feed probably does not work, but I do
not care at such times.

> I assume you're using a standard plain phone, not a cordless.

Of course.

> I am really surprised that is the case and as far as I know, that
> should be extremely rare.  Have you reported that to the phone
> company?  What is their response?

At first, I tried calling Verizon from the Comcast line, but I did not
have the right number to go from one local provider to another ...
when I did get through, I was always told that the problem must be in
my AC powered equipment, I would sometimes convince them that I did
expect those sets not to work, but that I had plugged a 2500 set into
the demarc, and it did not work either, and by the way, I was calling
them on my Comcast line, and did they think I should change my primary
line to Comcast too?

Usually the power would come back on before they had done anything,
but once a truck showed up at the SLIC across the street, so I walked
over and talked to the tech, who was setting up a portable generator.
He told me that the batteries at the SLIC were designed to last 12
hours, but they had been adding subscribers, and the batteries were
old and would no longer hold a charge, so they had to supply AC during
a power failure.

We both agreed that things were not the way things SHOULD be.  Lately,
I don't bother with the hassles of reporting, since I have the other
line and one or more wireless sets, and usually a VFD portable radio
available for a REAL emergency.

The FD portable will work until the system is changed over to the new 
and improved digital radio system ...  :)


Paul

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:42:18 EDT
From: Carl Moore <cmoore@ARL.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Discovering Where a Number Is


It had come across to me (the point I was making and why I wrote to
Telecom Digest) that someone had checked where the phone number was!
(Apparently, checking where it was gave an insight which might have
been missed otherwise.)

I too have wondered why the Scott/Laci Peterson case got that much
attention.  I don't mean to trivialize the case (there are deaths
involved), but I can quickly list two other cases of the death of a
pregnant wife, with husband being charged:

1. Jeffrey MacDonald, while he was an Army doctor in North Carolina
   in 1970.
2. Michael ("Mick") Fletcher, an attorney in the Detroit (Michigan)
   area, who was having an affair with a judge who as a result became
   a "judge behaving badly".

I do distance myself from "tabloid" treatment of a story, because I
think that may be more designed to make money from a story than being
concerned with getting it right.  I am more interested in the
forensics, and you could consider finding the location of a telephone
number to be a science of sorts.

------------------------------

From: Gene S. Berkowitz <first.last@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Discovering Where a Number Is
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:34:29 -0400


In article <telecom25.324.9@telecom-digest.org>, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 
says:

> Carl Moore wrote:
 
>> I happened to come across a recent MSNBC TV program regarding some
>> newsmakers.  As part of that, I saw an item on Scott Peterson
>> (convicted of murder of pregnant wife, Laci, in California).  So there
>> was the part about having Amber Frey as a mistress, and Scott
>> P. claimed to be calling her from Europe and supposedly gave a
>> telephone number which Amber found to be in Modesto, California.  Does
>> anyone else recall the program I am writing about?

> Frankly, I have no idea why this case made national news.  I can
> understand it being local news, but not national and definitely
> dragged through cable news channels ad nauseum.

> Anyway, to find the town associated with a given area code and
> exchange, call your long distance operator or Information.  This used
> to be free, but now they may charge you a $1.00 or so fee.  There may
> be websites to do this, but they might not be accurate.

No, to find the town, type the area code, a hyphen, the exchange, and
another hyphen into Google.  You will invariably get an address or
business in that area returned.

Note: the trailing hyphen is required or Google will assume you want to 
subtract the exchange from the area code.

--Gene

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:00:03 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones?
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> An old "Brady Bunch" episode showed the parents using 3 slot pay
> phones in a fancy restaurant.  They were beige.

It is possible they were GTE.  GTE's clone of AT&T's manufacturing arm
Western Electric, was called "Automatic Electric" and GTE pay phones
were beige; I never saw any other color.  This was in Long Beach,
California (and possibly Santa Monica and some other beach cities)
circa 1973-1987 (when our family left California).

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address?
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:31:01 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> I understand now the phoneco offers reverse information, that is, given
> a phone number they'll return the person's name and address.

> For personal security, many people don't want their home address
> readilly available, but they still want to be listed in the book so
> people can find and call them.  I called the phoneco to ask if
> addresses could be deleted or made generic (ie street name only, no
> house number, or town only) and they said no except for very special
> cases (ie a cop). Apartment dwellers can have the building address shown,
> not their apartment number.

> It seems to me the phoneco should allow no addresses freely if that's
> what the customer wants.

Can only speak about California where name-only listing has been a 
listing option for many years.

------------------------------

From: annie <dmr436@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address?
Date: 8 Sep 2006 14:46:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


> It seems to me the phoneco should allow no addresses freely if that's
> what the customer wants.

That's what I have listed. Surname, first initial only, and phone
number. No address.

------------------------------

From: <bv124@aol.com>
Subject: Phone Book: Listing Your Name Only, No Address?
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:01:31 -0700


I have had a Pacific Bell residence line in metropolitan Los Angeles since
1980, and the listing has never included a street address, either in the
printed phone book or as Information Only listing.  

There is/was always an option to be excluded from the Street Address
directory, which I believe was automatic exclusion in the case of those
subscribers NOT having the traditional listing.  

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:13:39 -0400
From: Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us>
Subject: Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers - VoIP
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation


On 7/19/2006, DLR wrote:

> To change the direction of this thread a bit I got a call yesterday on
> my Sprint cell phone from 303-720-1234. I had no idea at the time
> where area code 303 was so I let it go to voice mail. But they didn't
> leave a message. So today I tried to call it back and got a "no such
> number exists" type of message. And I can't find anyone with this
> number via Google searches and don't really want to pay for more
> information.

> Now to be honest it looks a bit bogus to me. 1234 and all.

> Anyone in the 303 area care to try and call it locally and see what it is?

It is not the 1234 at the end that is suspicious, it is the '303-720'
that looked suspicious even before I looked it up to confirm what I
suspected.

303 and 720 are overlay area codes for the same place, the Denver
Colorado metropolitan area.  No telephone company would assign as
prefixes, codes which are used in the same or an adjacent area simply
because the possibility of confusion would be tremendous.

I live in Northern Virginia, which has both 703 and 571.  Nearby is
Washington, DC (202), South and West Maryland (301 and 240), and south
virginia (540).  There is not going to be a 703-571, a 571-703, a
202-703, a 202-301 or any similar combination because of the potential
for confusion.

Basically anyone that has their own PBX can program the caller-id
number generated for outgoing calls.  I routinely get calls from
companies that either only display their toll free (800/888 etc.)
number, or generate a fake number like 999-999-9999 or 000-000-0000.

This can be done with some VOIP providers as well, depending on how
they set up their systems.

Further, as has probably been mentioned here, you can purchase a
calling card for 10c a minute that will allow you to call into an 800
number and set the originating number on calls made using the card, so
you can give any number you want as the caller-id value.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:34:39 EDT
From: Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com>
Subject: Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts?


I thought this would be easy, but Verizon's site isn't too helpful.
What is the lowest cost individual business line available in
Massachusetts Verizon territory and what is the total monthly cost?
This is be for incoming calls only, so the cheapest measured service
should be appropriate.  I actually want this for an ISDN line, but the
ISDN cost is specified as incremental to the basic charges (and I know
the increments).  The current charges look much too high (I haven't
seen the first detailed bill yet) so I need to figure out if they have
added extra local services that I don't want or ISDN features that I
don't want or some combination of the two ...

Dan Lanciani
ddl@danlan.*com

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #325
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sun Sep 10 23:11:35 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 030CC222F; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #326
Message-Id: <20060911031134.030CC222F@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:14:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 326

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Web Site Owner Gets 7 Years in Prison for Piracy (AP News Wire)
    Cell Phone Makers Fight Resales (Andrew Welsh-Huggins, AP)
    Re: Cute Cingular Junk Mail (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: Cute Cingular Junk Mail (mc)
    Re: Can You Connect 2 Lines in the NIU Together to Make Same Line (support)
    Overlay NPA-NXX Codes (re: Caution: Unidentified Caller) (Anthony Bellanga)
    Re: Newest Airport Regulations Cause Considerable Delay (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones? (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:29:40 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Web Site Owner Gets 7 Years in Prison for Piracy


The owner of one of the nation's largest Internet software piracy Web
sites has been sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

Nathan Peterson, 27, of Los Angeles, sold products copyrighted by
companies such as Microsoft Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc. at a huge
discount on his site, iBackups.net, prosecutors said. The site began
operating in 2003 and was shut down by the FBI in February 2005.

In addition to Friday's 87-month sentence, U.S. District Court Judge
T.S. Ellis III ordered Peterson to pay restitution of more than $5.4
million and to forfeit the proceeds of his scheme, which included
homes, cars and a boat.

Peterson pleaded guilty in December in Alexandria to two counts of
copyright infringement.

Justice Department and industry officials called the case one of the
largest involving Internet software piracy ever prosecuted.

Last month, Ellis sentenced a Florida man to six years in prison for
selling illegal copies of computer programs on another site,
BuysUSA.com.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:33:18 -0500
From: Andrew Welsh-Huggins, AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org><
Subject: Cell Phone Makers Fight Resales


By ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS, Associated Press Writer

People moving state to state, armed with cash and tricks to avoid 
scrutiny, are buying cheap prepaid mobile phones by the thousands with 
plans to sell them in Latin America and Hong Kong.

Cell phone companies say the practice is costing them millions of 
dollars, and some have hired private investigators to document what they 
say is illegal tampering with their phones. Wal-Mart, Radio Shack and 
other retailers are limiting how many phones they will sell at one time.

The buying has raised concerns the phones might be used to aid 
terrorism, though those in the trade say it's nothing but capitalism at 
its best no different than reselling stock for more than you paid.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Homeland
Security issued nationwide bulletins earlier this year warning police
to be on the lookout for bulk purchases of cell phones. Authorities
are worried that profits from the trade could end up financing
terrorism or that the phones could be used as detonators in attacks.

The practice at the center of court cases in Florida, Ohio and
Michigan appears widespread and in no danger of subsiding soon.
Participants in the trade don't appear very bashful.

"Don't leave a phone behind. To make real money buy them all," urged
an e-mail by Larry Riedeman of Larry's Cell in Altamonte Springs,
Fla., that was included in a lawsuit against that entity by TracFone
Wireless Inc. "Thousands a day if you can!"

Riedeman and other small companies are considered the middlemen in a
system that starts with buyers snapping up phones at retailers such as
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and ends with resale of the phones overseas.

In Ohio, two men acknowledged last month to authorities that they had 
delivered 600 TracFones to a middleman over three months.

Also in August, three Dallas men briefly charged in Michigan with
trafficking counterfeited goods told the FBI that several businesses
in Texas buy telephones "from hundreds of people like themselves,"
according to an FBI filing in that case. The phones are then sold to
middlemen in California, New York or Miami.

Another buyer, Bilal Mustafa, 22, of Minneapolis, told The Associated
Press he travels around the Midwest a week at a time in search of
phones. He and a buddy will buy four to six at once at small-town
department stores, as many as 250 a day.

Mustafa sells them to a cell phone business he wouldn't identify. He 
says he's doing nothing illegal and scoffs at FBI concerns that the 
practice could aid terrorists.

"If it did, I wouldn't do it," said Mustafa, a Palestinian immigrant 
from the West Bank. "I'm not stupid."

Purchasing cell phones in bulk is not illegal and authorities haven't 
had much luck trying to prosecute the buyers. Earlier this week, a 
federal judge threw out the charges against the men in the Michigan 
case, saying there wasn't enough evidence to take the case to trial.

The Michigan charges alleged that by removing the cell phones from their 
original packaging, the men made it easier to repackage the phones with 
counterfeit trademarks in violation of federal copyright law.

The men arrested in Ohio in August face a low-level charge of giving 
misleading information to police, including changing their story about 
why they had so many cell phones when they were first stopped.

Terrorism charges were leveled in both cases but quickly dropped.

The middlemen indicate an apparently insatiable hunger for the phones, 
with profits in some cases of 100 percent for a handset that retails for 
as little as $20.

The phones are so cheap because TracFone and other providers of
prepaid cellular service sell them at a loss to create a market for
their real profit maker, selling customers more call time.

For example, a Nokia 1100, one of the phones referenced in TracFone's 
lawsuit against Larry's Cell,  was being sold in stores for about $20 a 
phone. However, it probably cost TracFone about $25 per phone wholesale, 
said Paul Sagawa, an industry analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in 
New York.

The Dallas men arrested in Michigan said they had spent $20,000 on
phones within just a few days.

The Riedeman e-mails promise earnings of $10,000 a month for
aggressive buyers. Riedeman offered bonuses to such suppliers, from
$120 to anyone bringing in 400 phones a month to $2,000 for someone
buying 2,000 a month, according to court documents.

Mustafa wouldn't say how much he earns on each $20 phone but said it's
a reasonable profit.

"I don't think I'll make a million bucks," he said. "Just enough to
take care of my car, my gas, a hotel and make a little money."

Buyers -- often young men -- pay cash, frequently making purchases in the 
middle of the night to avoid scrutiny and to skirt store sales limits, 
according to affidavits and other filings in state and federal court.

They make up stories about why they need the phones, move from cashier 
to cashier or simply buy the limit from a store, wait awhile, then return.

"I have many times used other shoppers to help me," said the Riedeman
e-mail. "You would be surprised how many folks will lend a helping
hand."

Riedeman could not be reached to comment. E-mail and phone messages
were not immediately returned. No lawyer for him is listed in federal
court documents. A phone for his brother, Clint, who is also named in
the lawsuit, rang unanswered.

After receiving the phones from the buyers, often in bulk shipments,
the middlemen deactivate a software lock on the devices so they can be
used on other cellular services. The phones are then repackaged and
shipped to their next destination, records show.

A lawsuit filed in January by Nokia Corp. accuses Pan Ocean
Communications of Pompano Beach, Fla., of buying $20 cell phones from
Wal-Mart, Sam's Club and Target Corp. stores, disabling their
software, then reselling them for $39 as legitimate Nokia
handsets. The company sold them to distributors, wholesalers,
exporters and flea market booth operators, the lawsuit said.

A judge ordered Pan Ocean and another company, Sol Wireless Group of 
Miami, to stop reselling the phones. Messages seeking comment were left 
with attorneys representing the businesses.

Destinations have changed over the years, from Singapore in the past
to Mexico today, said John Walls, a spokesman for CTIA, a cellular
industry trade association that opposes the practice.

"You're able to deliver a pretty good product that will operate on the
Mexican network, the black market can deliver a handsome profit on
that device, and Mexican consumers have the opportunity to save
themselves a few dollars," Walls said.

Lawsuits filed by TracFone and Nokia also name markets in Latin
America and Hong Kong, where resale prices are higher.

Since TracFones that haven't been tampered with can work only in the
United States, overseas buyers ought to know they aren't being sold
legitimately, said Jim Baldinger, a TracFone attorney in West Palm
Beach, Fla.

Lawyers for the men arrested in Michigan and Ohio say their clients
were conducting legal business and are being targeted only because
they are of Middle Eastern descent.

"All these individuals were doing was buying and reselling phones,"
said Detroit attorney Nabih Ayad. "There's nothing illegal about
it. They buy cell phones from one retailer and sell them to another
retailer who can sell them for more."

Retailers, wireless service providers and phone makers don't see it
that way. "Resale on the black market is never a good thing," said
Wendy Dominguez, a Radio Shack Corp. spokeswoman.

At West Broad Cellular near downtown Columbus, owner Abdul Salameh
sells prepaid phones starting at $50, far above the price charged by
rivals whom he suspects of scooping them up at places such as
Wal-Mart.

Salameh, 26, says he's being undercut by the practice but isn't sure how 
to combat it:

"If people are selling them for real cheap, we're getting destroyed."

On the Net:

TracFone: http://tracfone.com
Nokia: http://www.nokia.com/index.html
CTIA: http://www.ctia.org

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Cute Cingular Junk Mail
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:28:12 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com



Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us> said on that big
USENET thingie:

> I have a theory about pricing of products or services.  When a company
> won't even give you an idea of what the product costs, especially on a
> monthly service plan, it's a clear admission

Is it one of those "If you have to ask, you can't afford it."
thingies?

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Cute Cingular Junk Mail
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 01:00:12 -0400


Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.325.6@telecom-digest.org...

> I have a theory about pricing of products or services.  When a company
> won't even give you an idea of what the product costs, especially on a
> monthly service plan, it's a clear admission they *know* they are
> ripping you off and if you knew what the product was going to cost
> you, you might not take it.

As they say, "If you have to ask, you can't afford it!" 

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Can you Connect 2 Lines in the NIU Together; Make the Same Line
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:41:35 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


Ivn C. Filpo <ivan.filpo@gmail.com> said on that big
USENET thingie:

> In my house,  initially there were two phone lines. One was used for
> phone and the other for fax. I cancelled the fax line a long time ago,
> and this line is conveniently next to the Vonage D-Link VTA Adapter.

> Instead of having to connect the adapter with a cable that would go
> across the wall, I came up with the idea of joining the two lines
> inside the Network Inteface Box. This way, if I join them with a

Shouldn't be a problem as long as you know where they are going and
there isn't a short anywhere.  Phone jacks are wired parallel anyway.


Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:49:18 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@notchur.biz>
Reply-To: no-spam@no-spam.no-spam
Subject: Overlay NPA-NXX Codes (re: Caution: Unidentified Callers)


********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.
********************************************************************

Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us> wrote:

> 303 and 720 are overlay area codes for the same place, the Denver
> Colorado metropolitan area.  No telephone company would assign as
> prefixes, codes which are used in the same or an adjacent area
> simply because the possibility of confusion would be tremendous.

> I live in Northern Virginia, which has both 703 and 571.  Nearby
> is Washington, DC (202), South and West Maryland (301 and 240),
> and south virginia (540).  There is not going to be a 703-571, a
> 571-703, a 202-703, a 202-301 or any similar combination because
> of the potential for confusion.

NEVER SAY NEVER!

Right now, there happens to be no assigned 303-720 nor 720-303 office
codes. But read on further down -- I will repost what I originally
said back in mid-July when this thread originally
appeared. Neustar-NANPA, the assignment body for US-based NPA-NXX
office codes does NOT flag either 303-720 nor 720-303 as "NOT to be
assigned" in their web-based databased. Afterall, this is an overlay
situation, and since ALL TEN DIGITS MUST be dialed, in the long run,
there is no conflict or ambiguity with such assignments. And inn some
overlay areas, the same digit combination is used for NPA and an NXX
within that NPA!

You also might want to go through some of the entries in NANPA's
NPA-NXX assignment database. In some cases, there are indeed flaggings
of 'UA' which means unassignable -- i.e., NOT to be assigned. And this
is still the case with certain combinations in overlay areas. But that
doesn't mean that in the next ten years or so, when ten-digit dialing
and overlays becomes more the norm throughout the US and Canada that
such combinations won't still be flagged as not assignable. And as I
mentioned, there are such assignment situations in some places
already.

Even in places where there aren't yet overlays or mandatory ten-digit
dialing, there are some cases where the numerics of an adjacent NPA
code, even one which is adjacent with local calling arrangments --
those numerics can also be used as an NXX office code in other
adjacent local NPA codes. The ambiguity is usually eliminated by the
use of a mandatory 1+ before ALL ten-digit calls, regardless of
whether the ten-digit number is local or toll. And all "home" NPA
calls in such area codes is still permissive as "just" seven-digits,
sometimes without differentiation as to local vs. toll for that
seven-digit "home" NPA call.

And here is the original post and my reply in this thread when it
originally appeared back in mid-July:

DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> wrote:

> I got a call yesterday on my Sprint cell phone from 303-720-1234.
> I had no idea at the time where area code 303 was so I let it go
> to voice mail. But they didn't leave a message. So today I tried
> to call it back and got a "no such number exists" type of message.
> And I can't find anyone with this number via Google searches and
> don't really want to pay for more information. Now to be honest it
> looks a bit bogus to me. 1234 and all.

It is bogus. 303 is the area code for the Denver CO Metro area.  (At
one time, the entire state of Colorado used 303, but that was some
time ago). 720 is being used as a central office code within the 303
area code in your situation, but the 720 numerics as an area code also
happens to be the overlay area code for the Denver CO Metro area.
Since ten-digit local dialing is mandatory within the Denver Co Metro
area of area codes 30 303 and 720 in overlay, there isn't anything
"wr-ng" with having a 303-720 code, nor a 720-303 code, nor even a
303-303 or 720-720 code. Ten-digit local dialing is mandatory in
overlay areas.

However, it happens that at this time, there is no such 303-720 code
assigned in the Denver CO Metro area. I looked up the central office
code reports at NANPA's website, http://www.nanpa.com and 303-720 is
unassigned but still available for assignment.

So, you probably got a call from a telemarketer sending bogus
caller-ID information. Typical. :(

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Newest Airport Regulations Cause Considerable Delay, Inconvenience
Date: 10 Sep 2006 17:31:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Paul Robinson wrote:

> This is one of those really wierd scenarios where you don't necessarily
> know who is worse, the typically incompetent and/or immoral Bush
> Administration, or Mr. Gunn, who, prior to his so called 'work' for
> Amtrak, was General Manager -- or should I say mangler

[snip]

Mr. Gunn has a highly respected record of achievement throughout his
career.  As a passenger and activist of several of the systems he
managed, I can personally attest to the pragmatic and cost effective
improvements he effected.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones?
Date: 10 Sep 2006 18:00:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Paul Robinson wrote:

> It is possible they were GTE.  GTE's clone of AT&T's manufacturing arm
> Western Electric, was called "Automatic Electric" and GTE pay phones
> were beige; I never saw any other color.

Automatic Electric sold equipment to a variety of "independent"
telephone companies, not just GTE.

Anyway, Western Electric did make beige and green pay phones.

It's pretty easy to spot an AE vs WE telephone set:  Western Electric
phones have the finger spot at the 3 o'clock position while AE phones
have it at the 5 o'clock position.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Plus which, on (at least the older) AE
rotary dial phones, the dial would return 'faster' when you removed
your finger. WE dials pulsed and clicked their way back.  PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #326
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Sep 11 18:58:51 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 7CE0D2201; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #327
Message-Id: <20060911225851.7CE0D2201@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:00:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 327

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Amazon.com Launches TV, Movie Service (Monty Solomon)
    Cell Phones Won't Keep Your Secrets (Monty Solomon)
    Speed Dials (Lisa Hancock)
    NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Lisa Hancock)
    Vodafone to Sell Fixed-Line Broadband Services (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Lisa Hancock)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 11, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: Can you Connect 2 Lines in the NIU Together; Make the Same Line (mc)
    Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones? (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: History of Automated Operator Services (Charles Gray)
    Re: Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts? (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:32:20 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Amazon.com Launches TV, Movie Service


By Elizabeth M. Gillespie, AP Business Writer

SEATTLE --Amazon.com Inc. launched a digital video downloading service
Thursday, ending months of speculation that the Internet retailer
would be getting into the online TV and movie business.

The service, dubbed Amazon Unbox, will offer thousands of television
shows, movies and other videos from more than 30 studios and networks,
the company said.

TV shows will cost $1.99 per episode, and most movies will go for
$7.99 to $14.99; movies can also be rented for $3.99.

Amazon Unbox will offer shows from CBS, News Corp.'s Fox, MTV,
Nickelodeon, PBS, BBC, A&E, Discovery Channel, Comedy Central and The
History Channel, among others. General Electric Corp.'s NBC and Walt
Disney Co.'s ABC were noticeably absent on the list of participating
networks. MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central are owned by Viacom Inc.

Seven major studios are participating in Amazon.com's service:
Viacom's Paramount, News Corp.'s 20th Century Fox, Sony Corp.'s Sony
Pictures, GE's Universal Studios, Time Warner Inc.'s Warner Bros.,
Lionsgate Entertainment Corp. and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

Walt Disney Pictures is not participating. Apple Computer Inc. CEO
Steve Jobs is the largest shareholder of Walt Disney Co., and the
announcement of Amazon's service comes just days ahead of the expected
launch of a movie download service at Apple's iTunes Music Store.

Details of the scope of Apple's expected offerings are unclear, but
its pioneering success and market dominance with its iTunes music and
TV show downloads as well as its iPod media players have already cast
Apple as a leading competitor.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/09/08/amazoncom_launches_tv_movie_service/

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:36:44 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Cell Phones Won't Keep Your Secrets


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The married man's girlfriend sent a text message 
to his cell phone: His wife was getting suspicious. Perhaps they 
should cool it for a few days.

"So," she wrote, "I'll talk to u next week."

"You want a break from me? Then fine," he wrote back.

Later, the married man bought a new phone. He sold his old one on 
eBay, at Internet auction, for $290.

The guys who bought it now know his secret.

The married man had followed the directions in his phone's manual to 
erase all his information, including lurid exchanges with his lover. 
But it wasn't enough.

Selling your old phone once you upgrade to a fancier model can be 
like handing over your diaries. All sorts of sensitive information 
pile up inside our cell phones, and deleting it may be more difficult 
than you think.

A popular practice among sellers, resetting the phone, often means 
sensitive information appears to have been erased. But it can be 
resurrected using specialized yet inexpensive software found on the 
Internet.

A company, Trust Digital of McLean, Virginia, bought 10 different 
phones on eBay this summer to test phone-security tools it sells for 
businesses. The phones all were fairly sophisticated models capable 
of working with corporate e-mail systems.

Curious software experts at Trust Digital resurrected information on 
nearly all the used phones, including the racy exchanges between 
guarded lovers.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/08/30/betrayed.byacellphone.ap/

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Speed Dials
Date: 11 Sep 2006 07:24:53 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Plus which, on (at least the older) AE
> rotary dial phones, the dial would return 'faster' when you removed
> your finger. WE dials pulsed and clicked their way back.  PAT]

The dial speed is about 10 pulses per second.  (A good modem manual
will tell you exactly the "contact make/break" times and the settings
for outside the U.S. as well).

Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
(on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

However, I think they realized this higher speed was rough on
equipment and did not provide it to the general public for that
reason.  I don't know if SxS could handle it but SxS components had
wear issues and certain improvements was rough on SxS unless it was
carefully spread out among switches within an office.

During the early ESS trials at Morris IL subscribers were given high
speed dials (and also tone ringers).  I wonder how subscribers felt
after the trial was over and they went back to their old system -- and
had to wait 25 years until such features were available again.

Several years ago the Wall Street Journal reported that a good number
of phone customers still had rotary service.  I suspect that
percentage has dropped; I wonder how many people still have only
rotary phones in their home today.

As discussed, some pay phones were intentionally converted back to
rotary to avoid drug trafficking, but with cell phones that's not an
issue anymore.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage
Date: 11 Sep 2006 07:36:36 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I was in Pennsylvania Station in New York and noticed in the main pay
phone alcove (Amtrak area) that nine people were using the pay phones
all at once.  That's more than I'd expect.

In addition to that alcove there were payphones scattered throughout
the station though I didn't take note of usage.  I did notice people
using pay phones in subway stations.

Of course, in NYC Verizon pay phones are 25c for a brief local period
and also offer coin long distance at 25c a minute.  Non Verizon pay
phones are 50c but for a longer initial period.  I found a convenient
Verizon 25c payphone on a corner for my needs (avoiding the 50c ones).
(Using my cell phone would be costly with (1) day rate and (2) roaming).

In one building a pay phone "closet" actually had a phone book with
it.  I haven't seen a phone book near a pay phone in years, it used
to be standard dangling on a light chain or on a pedestal on or the
shelf underneath.  Pay phone banks had a series of directories.

For some reason, otherwise it's hard to find a pay phone that allows
coin long distance calls.  My local train station once allowed that but
discontinued it.  If you try dialing 1+ at a pay phone you just get the
fast busy reorder signal.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:30:54 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Vodafone to Sell Fixed-Line Broadband Services


USTelecom dailyLead
September 11, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/erhEfDtusXbTvBvoIg

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Vodafone to sell fixed-line broadband services
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* EarthLink plans phone, Internet bundle for Chicago
* Commonwealth Telephone seeks buyer
* Apple may unveil PC-TV solution tomorrow
* Qwest Choice TV expands lineup
* Telecom Italia might unload wireless business
* Columnist: The easy days are over for cable
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Creating International Networks to Support Your Expansion Tomorrow
HOT TOPICS
* M&A fever takes telecom gear market by storm
* RIM unveils the BlackBerry Pearl
* DT announces business revamp
* Report: Huawei overtakes Alcatel in optical networking
* Alcatel-Lucent deal gets green light from shareholders
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Wireless carriers aim to make content easier to find
* Motorola, Nokia to collaborate on mobile TV interoperability
* CNET profiles top 10 must-have gadgets
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC to impose tougher phone security rules
DIVERSIONS
* This Hallowed Ground
* Battle Lines in Treating Depression
* At New Rentals, the Aim Is to Age With Creativity
* The Boyish Mr. Damon, Not So Boyish After All
* The Magnificent Obsession of the Northern Forest Canoe Trail

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/erhEfDtusXbTvBvoIg

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: 11 Sep 2006 12:51:38 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
best?

a) "Jones & Co."

b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
may I direct your call?"

d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
customers are waiting.

[public replies, please]

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 11, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:14:14 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 11, 2006
********************************

Vodafone Joins British Broadband Race
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19794?11228

     Mobile giant Vodafone is set to enter the British broadband
     market before the year-end, becoming the latest big-name entrant
     in the United Kingdom's highly competitive broadband
     market. Instead of pursuing the acquisition route adopted by
     rival mobile operator O2, Vodafone is adopting the broadband
     resale option and has signed a ...

Neuf Cegetel Plans October 2006 IPO
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19792?11228

     The largest French alternative fixed-line telecoms group has set
     an October date to list 20% of its shares in an initial public
     offering (IPO), which is aimed at raising between 500 million
     euro (US$636.2 million) and 1 billion euro. In a statement, the
     company said it had filed its IPO documents with French Stock
     Exchange watchdog ...

WiBro May Be Heading for Russia
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19789?11228

     South Korea's IT chief Rho Jun-hyong has suggested that WiBro
     (wireless broadband) technology, pioneered this year in South
     Korea, may be launched in Russia, according to press reports. Rho
     has recently returned from a nine-day tour of Russia, Romania,
     Germany, and Hungary in which he showcased the capabilities of
     WiBro. He stated ...

Iliad Announces Fiber Optic Network, Shares Fall
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19786?11228

     PARS -- Iliad SA, a provider of phone, Internet and TV services,
     announced plans to roll out a Euro1 billion (US$1.3 billion)
     high-speed fiber-optic network to French households from next year
     without raising prices. The company's shares plunged as some
     investors judged the plan too ambitious. The alternative ...

DOJ Wants Alltel to Shed Some Assets
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19783?11228

     After agreeing to divest some assets, Alltel received the
     go-ahead from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to acquire
     Midwest Wireless Holdings. The acquisition was first announced in
     November 2005.  The DOJ said it would not oppose the merger as
     long as Alltel divested assets in rural Minnesota - assets that
     include Alltel' ...

Nokia N93: So Cool, It's Hot
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19780?11228

     So what's the current ultra-cool, must have cell phone? A strong
     case could be made for the Nokia N93. The Nokia N93 offers
     multiple coolness factors, including an unusual, innovative
     design, cutting edge multimedia features and a price tag that
     will make envious friends emit a sustained, low whistle when you
     tell them how much ...

Unified Communications Drive SMB Converged-Apps Growth
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19778?11228

     According to new research, during the next five years, revenue
     growth from small and medium-sized business (SMB) converged
     applications will average 47 percent per year, compared to only
     16 percent for underlying IP Telephony (IPT) systems. Demand is
     particularly strong for such Unified Communications (UC)
     applications as Personal ...

Telecom Italia to Revamp
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19775?11228

     Trading in Telecom Italia SpA shares was suspended today at the
     carrier's own request as its board meets to discuss the Italian
     giant's future. The carrier announced Sunday that its
     chairman met the head of the Italian bourse, Consob (Commissione
     Nazionale per le Societ&agrave; e la Borsa), to discuss the
     operator's ...

Nokia, RIM & Moto: 'Prosumer' Trinity
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19772?11228

     The rules of the game in the smartphone market changed last week.
     Following Motorola Inc.s lead earlier this year with the Q phone,
     Research In Motion Ltd. (RIM) unveiled the Pearl on Wednesday --
     a $200 phone with a feature set that should appeal to both
     business and consumer users. Nokia Corp. capped the week ...

Broadband Powerline Networking to be King in Residential Networking
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19769?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- Broadband powerline networking, a wired
     technology that does not require new cabling to be installed, is
     poised to emerge as a winner in the residential networking
     interface race on a worldwide basis, reports In-Stat. Powerline
     networking has advantages over coax and twisted-pair cabling for
     in-home deployment ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>

Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Can you Connect 2 Lines in the NIU Together; Make the Same Line
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:11:34 -0400


<support@sellcom.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.326.5@telecom-digest.org ...

> Ivn C. Filpo <ivan.filpo@gmail.com> said on that big
> USENET thingie:

>> In my house,  initially there were two phone lines. One was used for
>> phone and the other for fax. I cancelled the fax line a long time ago,
>> and this line is conveniently next to the Vonage D-Link VTA Adapter.

>> Instead of having to connect the adapter with a cable that would go
>> across the wall, I came up with the idea of joining the two lines
>> inside the Network Inteface Box. This way, if I join them with a

My house is wired this way (it's my doing), so that I can use outlets
that were wired to either of the 2 original lines.  We used to have
line 1 on red and green and line 2 on yellow and black.  Now yellow
and black are tied to red and green respectively, coming out of the
network interface box.  Coming into it, red and green go to the house
wiring, and yellow and black are disconnected.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Color 3 Slot Payphones?
Date: 11 Sep 2006 11:05:37 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


Paul Robinson <paul@paul-robinson.us> wrote:

> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

>> An old "Brady Bunch" episode showed the parents using 3 slot pay
>> phones in a fancy restaurant.  They were beige.

> It is possible they were GTE.  GTE's clone of AT&T's manufacturing arm
> Western Electric, was called "Automatic Electric" and GTE pay phones
> were beige; I never saw any other color.  This was in Long Beach,
> California (and possibly Santa Monica and some other beach cities)
> circa 1973-1987 (when our family left California).

I dunno, in the Brady Bunch episode, they actually worked.  This would
indicate they were probably not GTE.


scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

Subject: Re: History of Automated Operator Services
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:54:02 -0500
From: Charles Gray <charles.gray@okstate.edu>


I haven't checked all of them lately, but one Ronald A. Katz has about
52 patents relating to "interactive technology".  You might check to see
if he has one related to automated operator services.  His organization
routinely sues large companies such as airlines and banks and they wind
up paying his fees.  One settlement involving Delta Airlines in 2004
covered "customer service provided to consumer and business accounts
delivered through automated systems as well as the combination of
automated systems and live agents".  See
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-330271_ITM

Regards,

Charles G. Gray
Senior Lecturer, Telecommunications
Oklahoma State University - Tulsa
(918) 594-8433

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts?
Date: 11 Sep 2006 11:05:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Dan Lanciani wrote:

> I thought this would be easy, but Verizon's site isn't too helpful.

In many cases it is better to talk to the company directly (hopefully
to a knowledgeable employee) rather than depend on their website.  I
would call the Verizon business office for Mass to ask them directly.

In many places the telephone and electric rates varies by location;
that is, city customers may pay less than suburban customers.

Complicating this matter is the "fees" and taxes.  Sometimes these are
included, sometimes these are charged separately.  They're always
changing, too.

Part of the cost of business service is yellow pages ads or lack
thereof.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity
Date: 11 Sep 2006 11:18:38 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Michael Perry wrote:

> Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
> is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity
> taskforce presented on Tuesday has found.

It's easy to blame the media (and now the Internet) for social
problems, but I don't buy it.

I find that hard to believe.  I question the influence of solely
advertising on obesity because: 1) all sorts of junk food has been
aggressively advertised on TV and print for 50 years yet this obesity
problem is recent and 2) they took cigarette ads off TV years ago but
smoking remained popular for a long time afterwards 3) they never
advertised hard liquor on TV but it is a growing youth problem and 4)
they don't advertise illegal drugs at all on TV but it's a problem.

I believe the modern household where both parents work full time or
there is only one parent in the house is to blame.  Under those
circumstances, parents simply do not have the time nor energy to
supervise the kids' afterschool snacks or to prepare traditional
healthy dinners.  They depend far more on restaurant foods which are
much fattier.  They give in when the kids whine for junk food to shut
them up because they're too stressed out and tired to fight with the
kids over it.

> stricter advertising standards in traditional media,

Given the ads for sugar cereals and candy I can't believe there are any
"standards" in traditional media.  So they add in the tag line "part of
a balanced breakfast"?  Big deal.

> "We need to recognize that everyone in society has a responsibility to
> ensure we provide healthy environments for children," Swinburn told

Hey, I have no love for junk food manufacturers, but don't blame them
for parents who aren't doing their job.  Does "everyone" include me?
So the next time I see a kid buying junk food at the store, should I
chastise him?  Yell at the store for selling it to him?  Watch how
fast I end up in jail.  I'll get in trouble just for telling kids to
clean up after themselves while snacking in the train station shelter.

> "Small changes to urban design such as age-appropriate playground
> equipment ... could have a significant impact on overall activity
> levels across the day," she told the conference.

More garbage.  Kids will play anywhere.

> Salmon said parental security and safety concerns that kept children
> at home were also limiting the physical activities of children and
> contributing to obesity.

That I do agree with.  Parents are very paranoid about where their
kids go and play especially unsupervised.  Is that fear justified?

Actually, the same parents ought to be checking what the heck their
kids are doing on line, what pictures they're posting on myspace and
what pers info they're sharing.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #327
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep 12 01:07:07 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id C640721F6; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #328
Message-Id: <20060912050706.C640721F6@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:08:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 328

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    FCC Questions AT&T Role in HP Scandal (Roy Mark)
    New Jersey Fights Bid to Block Phone Probe (Beth DeFalco, AP)
    Webloyalty, Fandango Named in Lawsuit (Reuters News Wire)
    Re: Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme (Al Gillis)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (Jim Stewart)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (Wesrock@aol.com)
    Re: Dialing Speeds (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Daniel J McDonald)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (DLR)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Jerry)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (mc)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Henry)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: FCC Questions AT&T Role in HP Scandal
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:17:59 EDT
From: Roy Mark <wire-service@telecom-digest.org>


FCC Questions AT&T Role in HP Scandal 
By Roy Mark 

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is launching a formal
investigation into AT&T's role in disclosing the personal telephone
records of HP board members and selected journalists to HP private
investigators.

The FCC sent what the agency calls a Letter of Inquiry (LOI) to AT&T
late last week seeking information about the company's role in the
scandal embroiling the HP board of directors, sources familiar with
the situation told internetnews.com.

The sources also said the high profile HP case may prompt the FCC to
take some action on a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) launched
in February over telephone company efforts to protect proprietary
customer information.

The FCC currently has open meetings scheduled for Sept. 26 and
Oct. 12.

AT&T and the FCC Monday refused to either confirm or deny the
LOI. Both parties cited policies of not commenting on ongoing
investigations.

"It's straight forward questions about the incident," one source
familiar with the inquiry said. Another source noted the FCC has sent
"numerous" LOIs to telephone companies since beginning the February
NPRM.

As part of an investigation into media leaks by the HP board, the
company admits its private investigators used a technique known as
pretexting to snoop on records of directors' private telephone calls
to journalists.

Pretexters fool telephone company representatives into revealing a
customer's personal data by using bits and pieces of known information
about the customer.

HP admits its private investigators used pretexting to obtain the
calling records of its board members and the journalists.

While federal law requires telephone companies protect the calling
records of their customers, a cottage industry in data brokering is
blossoming on the Internet. The telephone companies maintain data
brokers are obtaining the information through pretexting.

"AT&T is committed to both protecting the privacy of our customers and
to weeding out those who fraudulently obtain access to customer
information," AT&T said in an e-mail to internetnews.com Monday. "We
are working closely with all law enforcement officials to bring these
data thieves to account."

On a separate legal front, California law enforcement officials are
asking ISP Cox Communications to disclose documents that could help
the state learn the identity of those who accessed the phone records
of the HP board members and the journalists.

"We believe a crime has been committed," Tom Dresslar, spokesman for
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, said Friday.

An AT&T spokesman stressed Monday the company is aggressively moving
on its own to stop pretexters.

Last week, AT&T filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California targeting alleged pretexters who have
accessed AT&T customer information without authorization from either
AT&T or the customer.

Last month, AT&T won approval from a Texas court for expedited
authority to issue "John Doe" subpoenas.

AT&T hopes the new John Doe legal tactics will aid the company in
seeking the identities from ISPs of pretexters who gained access to
approximately 2,500 AT&T customers.

"We will use every means available to vigorously pursue these
individuals who, through fraud, have attempted to obtain unauthorized
access to customer information," Priscilla Hill-Ardoin, chief privacy
officer for AT&T, said in a statement.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:00:20 -0500
From: Beth DeFalco, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: New Jersey Fights Bid to Block Phone Probe


By BETH DeFALCO, Associated Press Writer

New Jersey has the right to obtain information about a federal
domestic surveillance program because that program is no longer a
secret, the state argued in response to federal efforts to quash its
investigation.

The Justice Department wants to throw "an impenetrable cloak
insulating the federal government's domestic surveillance activities
from all judicial scrutiny," acting New Jersey Attorney General Anne
Milgram said in a statement Monday.

New Jersey prosecutors subpoenaed 10 phone companies in May because of
suspicion that state consumer protection laws may have been violated
if phone companies were turning over records to the National Security
Agency.

The federal government sued the New Jersey attorney general's office
in federal court June 14, claiming compliance with the state's
subpoenas or even acknowledging the existence of such a program would
threaten national security.

The state in its response, filed late Friday, argued: "There is no
secret for the state secret privilege to protect."

The program monitors international phone calls and e-mails to or from
the United States involving people the government suspects have
terrorist links. A secret court has been set up to grant warrants for
such surveillance, but the government says it can't always wait for a
court to take action.

The federal government considers the program vital to fighting
terrorism, but critics say it unconstitutionally gathers private
information.

Federal officials have objected to efforts by several states and civil
liberties groups to investigate or shut down the NSA program. Most
recently, it filed a lawsuit against a Connecticut state agency last
week and against Maine utility regulators last month.

The courts have been split on that argument: A judge in Chicago agreed
with the government that state secrets would be exposed if a case
there went forward there, but another judge in San Francisco said the
surveillance is already so well known that there is was no danger of
spilling secrets.

A judge in Detroit last month ordered an immediate end to the program,
saying it violates free speech and privacy rights as well as the
separation of powers, but the plaintiffs agreed to keep the ruling on
hold until the judge decides whether to issue a stay.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:10 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Webloyalty, Fandango Named in Lawsuit


Webloyalty, Fandango Named in Coupon Lawsuit 

Online marketing company Webloyalty.com Inc. and online movie ticket
seller Fandango Inc. were named in a lawsuit on Monday that accuses
them of participating in a scheme where customers' credit cards are
billed monthly fees without their knowledge.

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, said when
customers bought from one of Webloyalty's partners such as Fandango
and clicked on a pop-up window offering a $10 coupon on their next
purchase, their credit card information was automatically transferred
to Webloyalty and they were unwittingly enrolled in its "Reservation
Rewards," program.

Once enrolled in Webloyalty's rewards program that promises dining
movie ticket and shopping discounts, consumers' credit cards are
billed up to $10 each month. The lawsuit is seeking class-action
status and unspecified damages.

"Hundreds, if not thousands, of consumers have complained to
Webloyalty and local, state and federal consumer protection agencies
about the deceptive nature of its sales of its "Reservation Rewards"
discount club product and its unauthorized access to their credit card
information," the complaint said.

The plaintiff named in the lawsuit, Joe Kuefler, bought movie tickets
from Fandango and was unknowingly enrolled in Webloyalty's rewards
program.

The lawsuit also claims that the two companies violated consumers'
privacy rights by disclosing and using their credit card information.

Representatives for Webloyalty and Fandango were not immediately
available for comment.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: Al Gillis <alg@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: Court Halts Alleged Web Site Billing Scheme
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:04 -0700
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95


Well, Danny, I've always thought the reasons our TelCos tolerate the
slimy people they bill for is that the practice carries "extreme
profits".  Not being associated with an operating telephone company I
can only guess, but why else would they allow all the complaints from
customers, and the likely inquiries from state regulatory commissions
and occasional newspaper editorials?

Usually they are quite sensitive to what their customers think of
them, but maybe the post-Ebbers environment has clouded their
thinking?

Al

danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.325.11@telecom-digest.org:

> In <telecom25.324.2@telecom-digest.org> Grant Gross, IDG
> <idg@telecom-digest.org> writes:

> [ snip of yet another phone bill scam operation ]

>> Whether the customers agreed or not to be billed after the trial,
>> their phone bills were often charged. When consumers called to dispute
>> the charges, the operators told them they had "verification
>> recordings" of an employee authorizing the charges.

> It really is about time the telcos _stopped_ enabling (to use a polite
> term) this garbage.

> While there might (and that's a very iffy "might") be some equal
> access issues preventing the telcos from ending all such third party
> billing, they could, and should, _today_, not tomorrow, have the
> following clause in any such billing agreement:

> " if more than X  percent of customers complain
>   about these charges, all such billing courtesies
>   will be immediately frozen".

> Yet they don't do this, even under pressure and after signing
> stipulations with Attorneys General.

> Maybe now that one of the more practical AGs (NYS's Spitzer) is likely
> to become governor, we'll see some handcuffs brought out. That should
> hopefully cut this down.

> _____________________________________________________
> Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
>      dannyb@panix.com
> [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:17:39 -0700
From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jkmicro.com>
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing 

> Michael Perry wrote:

>> Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
>> is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity

> It's easy to blame the media (and now the Internet) for social
> problems, but I don't buy it.

> I find that hard to believe.  I question the influence of solely
> advertising on obesity because: 1) all sorts of junk food has been
> aggressively advertised on TV and print for 50 years yet this obesity
> problem is recent and 2) they took cigarette ads off TV years ago but
> smoking remained popular for a long time afterwards 3) they never
> advertised hard liquor on TV but it is a growing youth problem and 4)
> they don't advertise illegal drugs at all on TV but it's a problem.

I suspect there are other factors involved, specifically the wholesale
replacement of sugar with high fructose corn syrup as a sweetener.
There are a couple of studies that implicate corn syrup as being more
addictive and more harmful than cane or beet sugar.  I know personally
that I can drink a glass of sugar-sweetened lemonade and not want
another.  OTOH, a glass of corn syrup lemonade will just cause me to
crave more.

Then there's the whole transfat thing too ...

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:00:08 EDT
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity


In a message dated 11 Sep 2006 11:18:38 -0700, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
writes:

> Michael Perry wrote:

>> Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
>> is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity
>> taskforce presented on Tuesday has found.

> It's easy to blame the media (and now the Internet) for social
> problems, but I don't buy it.

> I find that hard to believe.  I question the influence of solely
> advertising on obesity because: 1) all sorts of junk food has been
> aggressively advertised on TV and print for 50 years yet this obesity
> problem is recent and 2) they took cigarette ads off TV years ago but
> smoking remained popular for a long time afterwards 3) they never
> advertised hard liquor on TV but it is a growing youth problem and 4)
> they don't advertise illegal drugs at all on TV but it's a problem.

I was born in 1928 and so I grew up in the depression years of
the 1930s and then the 1940s.

Cooking then was commonly done with lard or solid other animal fats.
Hamburger places existed, fried their hamburgers and french fries in
lard, and the hamburgers were generally bigger and greasier than you
get today in most places frequented by children.  Why were't we
visited with an epidemic of obesity.

> They depend far more on restaurant foods which are
> much fattier.  They give in when the kids whine for junk food to shut
> them up because they're too stressed out and tired to fight with the
> kids over it.

But fast food places sell much tastier food.  And, at 78, I still find
them much better tasting than all the so-called health foods, low-fat
foods, and trendy products.  So much so that when something is
advertised or shows on the label that it is "xx% fat free" or
"contains only XX grams of fat," I will usually turn away from it.
Too bad, too, because some good-tasting products actually have not
been changed at all, but there is no way to tell it from the labeling.
      
I'm not sure, however, what this has to do with communications, except
that it more or less shows that at least some advertising is not as
effective as the advertisers would like.


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Speed Dials
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:13:57 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote on the topic of Speed Dials:

TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to Lisa Hancock:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Plus which, on (at least the older) AE
>> rotary dial phones, the dial would return 'faster' when you removed
>> your finger. WE dials pulsed and clicked their way back.  PAT]

> The dial speed is about 10 pulses per second.  (A good modem manual
> will tell you exactly the "contact make/break" times and the settings
> for outside the U.S. as well).

> Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
> and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
> out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
> (on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

> However, I think they realized this higher speed was rough on
> equipment and did not provide it to the general public for that
> reason.  I don't know if SxS could handle it but SxS components had
> wear issues and certain improvements was rough on SxS unless it was
> carefully spread out among switches within an office.

I tried an experiment once with a Hayes modem and tone dialing. I kept
setting the 'dialing speed' faster and faster on the modem so that
eventually, instead of getting a faster and faster 'beep, beep, bloop'
sound as it was 'dialing' or toning out its signal it got to where
the modem was 'toning out' its signal in just two or three seconds
total. Central office was still able to keep up with that pace on the
touchtone speed, but then I set the modem to get it all out in about
one or two seconds -- just an audible blur, no way for the naked ear
to make anything out of it -- and then about half the time, my call
'could not be completed as dialed'. If I slowed it down just a pinch,
so that ten digits still reached the central office in about three or
four seconds, it always heard me and made the right connection. I did
_not_ think touch tone signals could be interpreted that fast, but on
ESS I guess they can be.   

PAT

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
From: djmcdona@fnord.io.com (Daniel J McDonald)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:06 -0500


In article <telecom25.327.6@telecom-digest.org>,
<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.
> As a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

Too short.  There is no preamble that the caller can recognize to clue 
them in that the company name is coming.  I often have to ask the person 
to repeat the company name in this circumstance.

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

B, for most individuals, is the most appropriate.

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking,
  how I direct your call?"

Appropriate for a receptionist, not for the general worker.

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

Gag me.

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

Daniel J McDonald CCIE # 2495, CNX
Visit my website: http://www.austinnetworkdesign.com

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:26:32 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."
> 
> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."
> 
> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

D is somewhat condescending.

C is what most companies will require as it gets the customer to get on 
with the business of the call and not waste time. My wife works in a 
call center and getting to the point seems to be an issue with many 
folks these days.

------------------------------

From: Jerry <whoisit@nowhere.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:56:20 -0700


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

a.

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:36:30 -0400


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.327.6@telecom-digest.org:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."
>
> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

Both good.

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

A bit longwinded.

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

In fact, it is management-babble, a sort of Orwellian Newspeak that
comes out of the mouths of people who draft "mission statements" that
consist mainly of superlative adjectives making claims that, on the
face of them, are false.

Isn't there a computer program somewhere that makes up vacuous mission
statements at random on request?

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
From: henry999@eircom.net (Henry)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:05:35 +0300
Organization: Saunalahti Customer


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."
 
> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

I think that (d) is a crock, as too is (c) -- along with the equally
annoying variant 'blah blah blah ... how may I help you?' **

In general, (b) should be fine although it does depend on who you are.
Do you have a direct line, with people calling your number
specifically to speak to you? Then a name would be
appropriate. Otherwise, if you are a 'front desk' or general
dog's-body type person, (b) is perfectly adequate.

cheers,

Henry

** PS: And what _really_ gets my goat after the pseudo-formality of the
'how may I help you?' routine is when they then immediately shift down
to their normal overly-familiar approach:

"Thank you for calling Jones & Co; this is John Smith speaking. How may
I help you?"

[I have never dealt with this John Smith before.]

'Good morning, Mr Smith. This is Henry Larsen calling about the order I
placed last week'.

"Oh, hi Henry! Yeah, lemme just bring it up on my computer here...."

Grrrrrrrr.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #328
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep 12 17:17:02 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 92F102269; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:16:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #329
Message-Id: <20060912211614.92F102269@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:16:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:17:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 329

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Man Accused of Spamming Campaign Web Site Blames Karl Rove (L Neumeister)
    AT&T to Offer 20 Channels of TV For Web Viewers (Reuters News Wire)
    AT&T to Stream TV to Online Users (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 12, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (ranck@vt.edu)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (mc)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Robert Bonomi)
    Re: Speed Dials (Sam Spade)
    Re: Speed Dials (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing  (DLR)
    Re: Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts? (Dan Lanciani)
    Is Anyone Using Wikimapia Yet? (Neil McLain)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:14:28 -0500
From: Larry Neumeister, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Man Accused of Spamming Campaign Web Site Blames Karl Rove


By LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer

Attornies for a man accused of fraud say he was charged at the behest
of presidential adviser Karl Rove in retaliation for a flood of spam
e-mails sent to a campaign Web site. A federal prosecutor says the
claim is "absurd."

Assistant U.S. Attorney David M. Siegal urged U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain on Monday to reject arguments that Rove caused the
criminal investigation that led to charges against Robert McAllister.

Siegal said lawyers for McAllister made the "patently absurd argument
that the U.S. attorney's office in the Southern District is a shill
for Karl Rove and has arrested and indicted their client in some sort
of vindictive retaliation."

McAllister's lawyer Gerald L. Shargel said Monday he plans to try to
call Rove as a witness, if the court allows it.

McAllister, of Jupiter, Fla., is accused of conspiracy to commit wire
fraud while he was chief executive officer and president of Millennium
National Events Inc., an events promotion company. He was arrested in
August 2005.

The government says McAllister and Millennium tried to inflate the
price of the company's stock by "spreading false and misleading
information" about the company via unsolicited e-mails, or spam, to
potential investors. McAllister could face up to five years in prison
if convicted.

Shargel said McAllister's efforts to grow his company were "thwarted
by the wrongful conduct of stock promoters," one of whom sent e-mails
to a presidential Web site, http://georgewbush.com. That Web address
currently connects automatically to the Republican National Committee,
http://www.gop.com.

"Mr. Rove used his power and influence at the White House to seek
quick punishment of Millennium, and therefore also Robert McAllister,
for daring to spam the president's personal Web site," Shargel said.

The Daily News reported Sunday that e-mails, phone records and
transcripts of phone conversations indicate Rove contacted McAllister
and at least three stock promoters. The newspaper reported that White
House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Rove "vaguely remembered" the
e-mail onslaught but could not recall whether he or any other White
House worker contacted the Department of Justice.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.


NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:24:51 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: AT&T to Offer 20 Channels of TV For Web  Viewers


AT&T Inc. said on Tuesday it will launch a new Internet browser-based
television service that will allow subscribers to watch 20 channels,
including Fox News and the Weather Channel, on their computers.

The live TV service, named AT&T Broadband TV, will be available to
high-speed Internet users at $19.99 a month, adding to AT&T's line-up
of video products to meet growing demand for mobile and over-the-Web
entertainment.

Although the service does not work overseas, AT&T said one target
customer group would be U.S. travelers, who will be able to watch live
TV on their laptops as long as their Internet connection speed is at
least 500 kilobits per second.

The new service faces competition from all corners of the media and
technology world, from free Webcasts of prime-time TV shows such as
"Desperate Housewives" and "Lost" that are available on ABC's site, to
movie download services like CinemaNow and online video services such
as YouTube and Google Video.

It would also compete against Sling Media Inc., whose $200 consumer
electronics device lets viewers watch all of their cable channels on
Internet-connected laptops and handheld devices with no monthly fee.

AT&T, the biggest U.S. phone company, said it would work with media
streaming services provider MobiTV Inc. to offer the service, which
will also offer programs from Food Network, History Channel and
Bloomberg TV.

Phone companies like AT&T and Verizon Communications Inc. have
launched Web and video services over the past year to compete with
cable companies that have taken away their customers with combined
video, voice and Internet services.

AT&T recently launched AT&T Homezone, a television service delivered
to customers using high-speed Internet connections. The company said
it now has 7.8 million subscribers for its DSL (digital subscriber
lines) service.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:32:27 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: AT&T to Stream TV to Online Users


USTelecom dailyLead
September 12, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ersUfDtusXbWuuzxjA

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* AT&T to stream TV to online users
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Telecom Italia to split wireless, fixed-line businesses
* AT&T adds softphone to CallVantage
* MTVN to ink mobile-content deal with Universal Music
* News Corp. buys 51% stake in ringtone seller
* Telecoms become hot target for buyout firms
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* New! Ethernet in the First Mile
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* New Microsoft search tool goes Live
* Sprint bows video service
* Wireless e-mail to get a push
* TiVo to debut HD DVR
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Muni Wi-Fi can leave kids unchaperoned
DIVERSIONS
* Are You Breaking Up? A Cellphone Original Comedy Is Calling
* Bonding on Family Trips (Without the Parents)
* From Buell, a Bike to Take Harley in New Directions
* The New Season: 2 Lears, 1 Singular Sensation
* Ellen DeGeneres Is Chosen as Host of Next Year's Oscars

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ersUfDtusXbWuuzxjA

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 12, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:40:26 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 12, 2006
********************************

Uncertainty Trails Telecom Italia's Plan to Split Mobile and Fixed Units
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19821?11228

     The future of Italy's leading telecoms group, Telecom Italia,
     became unclear yesterday as the company's board approved a plan
     to reinvent the company as a media-focused player and spin off its
     mobile and fixed-line units. Although the company said it has not
     given any mandate nor received any offers for a sale of its
     assets, ...

Telus to Convert to Income Trust
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19818?11228

     Telus has announced that its board of directors has approved
     plans to reorganise Telus as an income trust, which will stand to
     be the largest in Canada. While this is still subject to
     regulatory approval and a vote by shareholders requiring 66.6%
     agreement, this move will allow the company to optimise its tax
     position and pass on more ...

DBD Signs Airspan for WiMAX Roll-out
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19815?11228

     Germany's leading WiMAX provider, Deutsche Breitband Dienste
     (DBD), has signed a contract with Airspan Networks for the
     roll-out of WiMAX technology in Germany. According to the terms
     of the deal, Airspan will deploy its AS.MAX family of WiMAX
     products. DBD has placed orders for 400 base stations under the
     agreement to date.  Airspan ...

Creative License: Content Aggregators Ease the Pain of Video Launches, 
Expansions
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19813?11228

     A growing number of outsourcers known as content aggregators are
     approaching telcos, and others, with packages of video content
     and related services so service providers don't have to negotiate
     their own time-intensive licensing deals with studios and other
     programmers in a one-off fashion.  Many content aggregators are
     targeted ...

Cingular to Launch Keyboard Nokia Phone
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19812?11228

     NEW YORK -- Cingular Wireless plans to sell a new BlackBerry-like
     device from Nokia Corp. for as low as $150, perhaps the most
     aggressive entry yet in an increasingly crowded market of devices
     with typewriter keypads for wireless e-mail and text messaging.
     The Nokia E62, a version of which went on sale overseas earlier
     this ...

AT&T Launches Live Broadband TV Service
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19810?11228

     NEW YORK -- AT&T Inc. is launching an Internet TV service where
     subscribers can watch live cable channels such as Fox News on any
     computer with a broadband connection for $20 per month.  The AT&T
     Broadband TV service announced Tuesday features about 20 channels
     of live and made-for-broadband content. The channel ...

FCC Eyes New Uses For 700 MHz 'Guard Bands'
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19804?11228

     The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering new
     uses for so-called 'guard bands' in the 700 MHz
     frequency range that were auctioned off to licensees in 2000 and
     2001.  The winners of the licenses have deployed only a handful
     of systems since that time.  In a recently released Notice of
     Proposed Rule ...

Wireless Challenge Remains After 9/11
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19801?11228

     The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says that it has made
     'significant advances' in making emergency service radios
     interoperable on this fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist
     attacks. The DHS, however, adds that true interoperability requires
     a long term, continuing investment and cannot be solved by a
     one ...

XConnect Takes Out Pulver's IPeerX
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19798?11228

     The VOIP peering company XConnect Global Networks Ltd. announced
     Tuesday its acquisition of VOIP pioneer Jeff Pulver's peering
     company IPeerX.  The terms of the deal were not disclosed; the
     companies are saying only that both cash and stock changed hands.
     IPeerX was originally the carrier peering portion of the
     Pulver.com ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: ranck@vt.edu
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

Either of the above is good, possibly adding "John Smith speaking" to
a) or substituing "John Smith" for the company name in b)

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

If it's a receptionist, then eliminate the person's name and it's
still good.  A little long winded, but OK.

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

Gack!  This is just begging for smartass answers and comments from
customers.  Some management school hotshot learned that the language
used and phrases spoken by employees can affect tone and
professionalism of a transaction, but didn't quite get the real idea.
Being polite and professional is good, over-reaching into smarmy is
bad.

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: 12 Sep 2006 10:32:09 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

This is fine.

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

This is fine, if it's actually in the morning, but it takes a little longer.

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> nmay I direct your call?"

This is fine for someone who is a receptionist or otherwise directing
calls. A better variant for other folks is "Jones and Co., John Smith
speaking."

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

Managers that make people do this sort of thing should be shot.  When
I was a kid, we had a man from the telephone company come to speak
with us at school, probably around third grade.  He explained that the
key to using the phone was to keep your call short and get your
business done while being polite about it.  Anything that extends the
call needlessly is a bad idea, especially if it's possibly offensive
and condescending to the customer like this is.

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

Yes, it's very popular, because it's easy for managers to do this and
get a notion that they're making their employees care about customer
service.  In fact, this sort of thing makes employees LESS apt to care
about really taking care of customers.

scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:57:16 -0500
Organization: Disorganized


In message <telecom25.327.6@telecom-digest.org> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?
 
> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> e) Company name, Dave speaking.

The preceding post may have contained unsuitable materials
and should not have been read by small children.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:14:26 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 11 Sep 2006 12:51:38 -0700 wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.
> As a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think
> is best?

> a) "Jones & Co.

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> In my opinion b) is the most civil substituting morning, afternoon or
> evening.

A seems too abrupt to me.

I agree with you that C and D are a waste of breath and are somewhat
annoying.  C would be fine if the call is being answered by a
switchboard operator who only directs calls.  John Smith speaking is
totally unncessary.

D is *very* annoying.  I don't want an advertisement when I call a
business.  I want them to just help me with whatever my need is.

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

I've made it my policy that if I'm waiting in line to be served and
the sales clerk thinks it's *more* important to take a telephone
interruption than to serve me I'll put down my purchase and walk out
of that store.  Telephone customers do not have any more clout than
customers who are in front of you.

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:09:08 -0400


DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.328.9@telecom-digest.org:

> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

>> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how

> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> D is somewhat condescending.

Bingo!  You've put your finger on it.  It seems to imply a low opinion of 
the hearer's intelligence:  "We think we can bamboozle you with empty 
exaggeration."

> C is what most companies will require as it gets the customer to get on
> with the business of the call and not waste time. My wife works in a
> call center and getting to the point seems to be an issue with many
> folks these days.

Interesting.  I guess I'm too old or too shy ... What do callers
normally do if you just answer "Good morning, Jones & Co."?

I normally answer my phone "This is M... C..., how can I help you?" and 
telemarketers utterly clam up when they hear it, as if I had been casting 
spells on them in the Unknown Tongue.

------------------------------

From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi)
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:42:26 -0000
Organization: Widgets, Inc.


In article <telecom25.327.6@telecom-digest.org>,
 <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

I tend to answer _that_ one with:  "I don't know what kind of switchboard
you have, but generally, you dial the appropriate extension, and press
RELEASE"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer the
> phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when other
> customers are waiting.

In truth, i figure *any* of the above are better than an
auto-attendant.

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Re: Speed Dials
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:13:02 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
> and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
> out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
> (on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

As I recall, operators had dials that did 20 pps.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:51:57 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Speed Dials


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 11 Sep 2006 07:24:53 -0700 wrote:

> The dial speed is about 10 pulses per second.  (A good modem manual
> will tell you exactly the "contact make/break" times and the settings
> for outside the U.S. as well).

> Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
> and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
> out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
> (on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

> However, I think they realized this higher speed was rough on
> equipment and did not provide it to the general public for that
> reason.

Personally, I don't believe it caused any more wear and tear on
equipment than what a 10 pps dial would make on the system.  Since
panel, #1XB and #5XB all used common control and didn't do anything
til the requisite amount of digits had been entered in the receiving
registers likely could care less how fast the pulses came into the
registers.  And I don't think it caused any more wear and tear than
receiving MF or DTMF.

> I don't know if SxS could handle it but SxS components had
> wear issues and certain improvements was rough on SxS unless it was
> carefully spread out among switches within an office.

Wear issues weren't likely the problem with 20 pps dials o n SXS.  The
problem is that SXS systems cannot keep up with pulses as fast as 20
pps.  It might work *sometimes* but for constant reliable service 20
pps dials would not likely have enough reliability to be used.

As for "why subscribers were never given 20 pps dial phones as a usual
thing" my guess is that WECO never put that into widespread production
so it wasn't made available as a standard dial in a standard 302 or
500 (whichever would have been in use at the time.)  When Touch-Tone
(DTMF) came out in '64 it was a viable option that was going to
eventually be implemented throughout the Bell System eventually.
Whether this is the reason or not is only my speculation.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:06:08 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 11 Sep 2006 07:36:36 -0700 wrote:

> Of course, in NYC Verizon pay phones are 25c for a brief local period
> and also offer coin long distance at 25c a minute.  Non Verizon pay
> phones are 50c but for a longer initial period.  I found a convenient
> Verizon 25c payphone on a corner for my needs (avoiding the 50c ones).
> (Using my cell phone would be costly with (1) day rate and (2) 
> roaming).

Here in Seattle pay phones have been 50 cents untimed for several
years now.  Prior to that they were 35 cents for about a month!  Prior
to that they were 25 cents.  The telcos in their infite wisdom decided
that the competition from cellphones was a good reason to double the
rate for pay phones.

As far as using or not using your cellphone, well at least for me my
cellphone is for *my* convenience.  Why have a cellphone if you don't
use it?  It's rather likely that even if you did have any overage from
what was allowed to you in your monthly plan it would likely be less
than forking out coins for a pay phone.  I have a $30/month plan for
my cellphone and in the four years that I've had the plan I've never
gone over my allotment and I use it as my only phone.

> In one building a pay phone "closet" actually had a phone book with
> it.  I haven't seen a phone book near a pay phone in years, it used
> to be standard dangling on a light chain or on a pedestal on or the
> shelf underneath.

Here in Qwest territory in Washington state it's pretty common to have
directories (white and yellow) with pay phones.  I think it's required
at least when the phone is put in that directories be available.
There is no free directory assistance from payphones in the Qwest
Washington state area.

> For some reason, otherwise it's hard to find a pay phone that allows
> coin long distance calls.  My local train station once allowed that but
> discontinued it.  If you try dialing 1+ at a pay phone you just get the
> fast busy reorder signal.

AT&T was the only carrier that would place coin sent paid calls
inter-LATA.  AT&T stopped handling sent paid inte-LATA calls several
years ago from CO controlled pay phones.  Intra-LATA calls (at least
in Qwest territory) can still be made sent coin paid.  On the
"Millennium" smart pay phones you can make sent paid inter-LATA calls.
AT&T evidently doesn't want to handle inter-LATA calls if operators
are involved at all.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:29:41 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing 


Jim Stewart wrote:

>>> Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
>>> is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity

>> It's easy to blame the media (and now the Internet) for social
> problems, but I don't buy it.

>> I find that hard to believe.  I question the influence of solely
> advertising on obesity because: 1) all sorts of junk food has been
> aggressively advertised on TV and print for 50 years yet this obesity
> problem is recent and 2) they took cigarette ads off TV years ago but
> smoking remained popular for a long time afterwards 3) they never
> advertised hard liquor on TV but it is a growing youth problem and 4)
> they don't advertise illegal drugs at all on TV but it's a problem.

> I suspect there are other factors involved, specifically the wholesale
> replacement of sugar with high fructose corn syrup as a sweetener.
> There are a couple of studies that implicate corn syrup as being more
> addictive and more harmful than cane or beet sugar.  I know personally
> that I can drink a glass of sugar-sweetened lemonade and not want
> another.  OTOH, a glass of corn syrup lemonade will just cause me to
> crave more.

> Then there's the whole transfat thing too ...

> Of course it has nothing at all to do with many parents not letting
> wanting kids to "just play". They want it structured, planned, and
> coordinated. So when at home with free time the only things to do are
> TV and video games. Many parents don't want their kids playing around
> the neighborhood. After all aren't 1000s of kids being abducted every
> hour?

Give me a break.

We have a baseball field in a city park 3 blocks from my house in a
fairly nice suburban area. It's deserted most of the time except for
organized team play. When I was young we moved the cow pasture about
the same distance away to have a field to use. My kids tell me the
neighbors don't want to play outside. :)

I never blame the TV or mass media for what my kids do. If there was
an influence it was my fault for allowing it. Period. But many folks
are no longer willing to sacrifice their way of life to raise their
kids properly. I'm guilty to some degree but I did do two things.

We dropped cable while the kids were in elementary school.

No video games in the house. (And I'm a confirmed video game addict.)

David
(Father of 2 teens.)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:17:27 EDT
From: Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com>
Subject: Re: Cheapest Verizon Business Line in Massachusetts?


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Dan Lanciani wrote:

|> I thought this would be easy, but Verizon's site isn't too helpful.

> In many cases it is better to talk to the company directly (hopefully
> to a knowledgeable employee) rather than depend on their website.  I
> would call the Verizon business office for Mass to ask them directly.

The problem with this approach is that they lie, especially in
response to questions of the form, 'what is the least expensive way to
do x?'. It isn't necessarily deliberate -- they may be simply
repeating the lies that have been told to them -- but they will defend
those lies to the last.  The only way to win is to be 100% confident
of your facts.  This in turn requires either careful study of the
tariffs or (much easier) reference to an existing billing arrangement.
(Yes, I realize that an existing billing arrangement might be
grandfathered or might be a special assembly, but for something this
simple I was hoping a few data points would make the answer obvious.)

Dan Lanciani
ddl@danlan.*com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:25:37 -0500
From: Neal McLain <nmclain@annsgarden.com>
Subject: Is Anybody on This List Using Wikimapia Yet?


Wikimapia appears to be a cross between Google maps and Wikipedia. It 
combines satellite images from Google with a database of Wikipedia-like 
"places" created by volunteers. Although Wikimapia has only existed for 
a few weeks, it already contains an enormous number of places scattered 
all over the planet.

To see how Wikimapia works, go to http://www.wikimapia.org/ and click on 
one of the little white boxes. This will take you a satellite image of a 
city, where you'll see more white boxes. Each of these boxes highlights 
a "place" that some volunteer has created and described. Click on any 
white box to read the description.  You can navigate around by dragging 
the image with your mouse, and you can add your own comments to any 
description by selecting MENU-->EDIT.

You can also create a new place by clicking WIKIMAPIA-->ADD NEW PLACE. 
A white box will appear in the center of your screen; adjust its 
location, then save it. The new place will appear as an "upcoming" 
place, which means Wikimapia won't accept it as final until several 
other volunteers have voted to approve it (you can't vote for your own 
places).  To view upcoming places, select VIEW-->UPCOMING PLACES.

For my part, I've been creating places all over the country.  A few of 
my favorites (some of which are still upcoming):

-- Brazoria County (Texas) Historical Museum, where I volunteer 
cataloging old maps. http://tinyurl.com/p86q6

-- The Spiral Jetty, an earthwork sculpture in the Great Salt Lake. 
http://tinyurl.com/gtpe7

-- A PCS antenna on a lighting structure at an athletic field.  You 
can't see the antenna, but you can see its shadow on the shadow of the 
tower.  http://tinyurl.com/nuth4

-- The former location of the mouth of the San Bernard River.  When this 
sat photo was taken, the river flowed into the Gulf of Mexico; however, 
it's now completely blocked by a sandbar piled up recent windstorms. 
http://tinyurl.com/ef4lh

-- The San Bernard Oak, the largest Live Oak in Texas.  It stands in a 
dense bottomland forest, so in the satellite view it looks just like its 
surroundings.  I located it by GPS coordinates. http://tinyurl.com/n4eux

-- The Kansas/Nebraska Point of Beginning, the starting point for every 
land survey in Kansas, Nebraska, most of Colorado, most of Wyoming, and 
a small part of South Dakota. http://tinyurl.com/egem5

-- Independence, Kansas, home of our moderator.  The main intersection 
in downtown Independence (Main and 10th streets) falls on a section 
corner 96 miles east, and 191 miles south, of the aforementioned 
Kansas/Nebraska POB (and more properly described as the southeast corner 
of Section 25 T32S R15E).  http://tinyurl.com/zj3r4

Neal McLain

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #329
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Sep 13 00:53:50 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 0FE5D2249; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #330
Message-Id: <20060913045349.0FE5D2249@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:55:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 330

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Morocco Jails Two For Disrupting U.S. Computers (Reuters News Wire)
    Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (Paul F. Roberts)
    School Children Shrug Off Enmities in Cyberspace (Kevin Smith)
    Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (njem)
    Dropping LD Carrier, PICC/Ridiculous Taxes Still Abound? (B. Wright)
    Re: AT&T to Stream TV to Online Users (Rick Merrill)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (mc)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Pete Romfh)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (DLR)
    Re: Speed Dials (DLR)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (DLR)
    Re: Speed Dials (DLR)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:26:09 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Morocco Jails Two For Disrupting U.S. Computers


A Moroccan court on Tuesday jailed two men for one and two years for
unleashing computer worms that disrupted networks across the United
States, court officials and lawyers said.

The court in Sale, twin city to the Moroccan capital Rabat, convicted
19-year old science student Farid Essebar and his friend Achraf
Bahloul, 22, for their role in creating and spreading the Zotob worm
last year.

Moroccan authorities said the two men had one accomplice in Turkey who
was named earlier by the FBI as Atilla Ekici.

Zotob caused computer outages at more than 100 U.S. companies,
including major media outlets like CNN and the New York Times. But it
did not create widespread havoc like software programs such as SQL
Slammer and MyDoom.

"The court convicted the two men for conspiracy, theft, using forged
credit cards and illegal access to computer systems," a court official
said.

It sentenced Essebar and Bahloul to two years and one year in prison
respectively. The two men' lawyers said they planned to lodge appeals
soon.

The FBI said close teamwork with Microsoft Corp. and authorities in
Morocco and Turkey helped net Essebar and Ekici 12 days after the
attack.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:28:39 -0500
From: Paul F. Roberts <yahoo@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole


By Paul F. Roberts

Security companies were gearing up for war last week, after Microsoft
released its August 'Patch Tuesday' security fixes. And for all the
hyperbole around one of those patches, MS06-040, it's a wonder we
aren't all hunkered down, Terminator style, warming ourselves by the
glowing embers of now-useless computers and trying to figure out how
to keep the cyborgs at bay.

Alas, dire predictions of massive worm outbreaks from security
vendors, and a stern warning from the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, proved a bit overblown.

The security hole in question was rated 'critical' by Microsoft and is
in Windows' Server Service, a Windows component that provides support
for RPC and allows Windows users to share resources such as disks and
printers on a network. That makes it remarkably similar to the hole
the Blaster worm took advantage of and may explain the strong warnings
for companies to patch the hole, said Vincent Weafer, senior director
at Symantec Security Response.

"I think when you look at the nature of the vulnerability, it caused 
people to be concerned. You can do remote connections [to vulnerable 
computers] and not validate those connections, then get remote access," 
Weafer said.

Some of those fears were confirmed when reports surfaced, just days
after the Aug. 8 patch release, that computers infected with malicious
IRC 'bot' programs were scanning the Internet for Windows
systems that had the MS06-040 vulnerability and then using publicly
available code to exploit that hole and add vulnerable systems to bot
networks that are used to carry out denial-of-service attacks and
distribute spam.

The managed security service provider LURHQ analyzed one of those bot
programs, irc.mocbot, and found that it was being used to enlist
vulnerable computers for spam campaigns, with command and control
coming from servers in China, according to Joe Stewart, senior
security researcher at LURHQ.

Despite the dire warnings, however, reports of infections from mocbot or 
other malicious code targeting MS06-040 are few and far between, and 
there's no indication that a Blaster-style worm is in the offing, 
experts said.

Part of the reason is improved security. Companies that have upgraded
to Windows XP SP2 or are using a third-party desktop firewall won't be
prey to the scanning IRC bots. Windows 2000 systems, which are
particularly vulnerable to exploitation through MS06-040, are harder
to find in enterprises, Stewart said.

The bigger picture is that worms such as Blaster are oh-so 2003.

"The big pandemic worm is not out there because nobody's motivated to do 
it," Weafer said. "Spammers want to be low-key and low-intensity."

Copyright 2006 Yahoo! Inc.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:34:08 -0500
From: Kevin Smith <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: School Children Shrug Off Enmities in Cyberspace


By Kevin Smith

Cyberspace get-togethers between schoolchildren in British-ruled
Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic are helping break down decades
of mistrust and could provide a model for young people in conflict
zones elsewhere.

These are the conclusions of research by education experts on both
sides of the Irish border, to be published on Wednesday, which shows
how virtual links using low-cost communications technology can change
entrenched attitudes among young people.

The research is based on findings from the "Dissolving Boundaries"
project, which has set up broadband computer collaborations between
pupils at more than 170 schools in the north and south of religiously
and politically divided Ireland.

Pupils communicate with each other through computer and
video-conferencing to produce projects on topics such as "Norman
Castles in Ireland," "The Irish Famine," and "Myths and Legends" and
also have the chance to meet face-to-face during the year.

"We know that the right kind of contact between young people reduces
prejudice," said Roger Austin from the University of Ulster in
Northern Ireland.

Northern Ireland suffered more than 30 years of sectarian conflict up
until a peace pact in 1998. Some 95 percent of pupils in the province
attend schools that are predominantly Roman Catholic or Protestant.

Experts say the success of the Irish project could pave the way for
educators in the Middle East and elsewhere who are struggling to break
down barriers between young people.

Closer to home, they say, the project could be applied in England to
link young British-Asians to white students in some of the country's
more segregated areas.

The report, "Dissolving Boundaries: Building Communities of Practice,"
will be unveiled at an international conference on "The role of ICT in
Bridge-building" at the University of Ulster.


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

From: njem <njem@hughes.net>
Subject: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Date: 12 Sep 2006 16:31:12 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

Thanks,

Tom

------------------------------

From: B. Wright <bmwright@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:44:05 UTC
Organization: XMission Internet http://www.xmission.com
Subject: Dropping LD Carrier, PICC/Ridiculous Taxes Still Abound?


It's been some time since I have had any type of analog phone service
so maybe someone here can help me out.  I'm looking at a family
member's phone bill right now and AT&T seems to be robbing them of
about $11/month for nothing but horrible long distance rates.  Most of
these are recurring charges for things like: $2.99/mo for the
priveledge of them sending you a bill!  To give you an idea of the
extortionate (in relation to todays market) rates, a call to Hawaii
was charged at .41/minute!

To cut it short, they almost never use long distance and if they put
the approximately $120-132/year they're being charged for nothing
towards a calling card it would yield thousands of minutes of long
distance calls.  I do remember in past though that there were absurd
taxes that the LD carrier collected and to my knowledge passed on to
the local carrier, like the PICC.  Once you dropped long distance
completely from the line the local carrier decided it was still
entitled to that money and then tacked it onto your phone bill as
additional taxes.  Is this still the case or will dropping the LD
service completely elimate all charges associated with the LD portion
of the bill without adding on to the local charges/taxes?

If this is one of the locale specific questions, then the area service
in question is Utah.

Any info appreciated.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:15:10 -0400
From: Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AT&T to Stream TV to Online Users


USTelecom dailyLead wrote:

> USTelecom dailyLead
> September 12, 2006
> http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ersUfDtusXbWuuzxjA

> TODAY'S HEADLINES

> * AT&T to stream TV to online users

What are the bandwidth numbers here? If I'm streaming TV and my
neighbors start to do the same thing, where do we run out of capacity?

Is this only over ATT fiber optics?

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:57:42 -0400


mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.329.9@telecom-digest.org ...

> I normally answer my phone "This is M... C..., how can I help you?" and
> telemarketers utterly clam up when they hear it, as if I had been casting
> spells on them in the Unknown Tongue.

To be precise, here's how it goes:

"This is M... C..., how can I help you?"

(long pause)  "Uh..."  (long pause)  "Is this M... C...?"

"Just what I said.  How can I help you?"

"Uh... uh..."

I presume telemarketers are only trained to talk, not to comprehend
speech.

------------------------------

From: Pete Romfh <promfhTAKE@OUThal-pc.org.invalid>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:06:40 -0500
Organization: Not Organized


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.
> As a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you
> think is best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking,
> how may I direct your call?"

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking,
> how may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

> While waiting in line at the video store, the clerk had to answer
> the phone with D.  To me, that was a waste of time, especially when
> other customers are waiting.

[public replies, please]

I concur with the group that D is totally smarmy.  The one you missed
that annoys me the most is answering the phone with a question.

"Thanks for calling the help(less) line, this is Fred. May I have your
account number <or whatever>?"

If you give them a number they'll respond with the other 10 data
fields on their computer screen then finally ask, "How can I help you?".

Then there's the "Green, Pink, Yellow" variation.  "The phone goes
*Green, Green, Green* ...  so I *Pink" up the handset and say ...
*Yellow* this is Mujibar!!


Pete Romfh, Telecom Geek & Amateur Gourmet.
http://www.bigoven.com/~promfh
promfh (at) hal-pc (dot) org

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:35:50 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


>> D is somewhat condescending.

> Bingo!  You've put your finger on it.  It seems to imply a low
> opinion of the hearer's intelligence: "We think we can bamboozle you
> with empty exaggeration."

>> C is what most companies will require as it gets the customer to get on
>> with the business of the call and not waste time. My wife works in a
>> call center and getting to the point seems to be an issue with many
>> folks these days.

> Interesting.  I guess I'm too old or too shy ... What do callers
> normally do if you just answer "Good morning, Jones & Co."?

At the major airline call center where my wife works in baggage claims, 
they tend to start with a story and if not cut off can take 5 or 10 
minutes telling this story which may or may not, usually not, be germane 
to the reason for the call.

>> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
>> may I direct your call?"

To expand on my wife's job and why they start with something like this.

She works for a major airline. At peak times there may be 5,000 people
answering the phones. Now some are assigned to handle baggage claims
(she is), some domestic sales, some international sales, some
"premium" customers, some tours, etc...

The rub is that at times many of these specialties may be idle. So the 
call distribution center will route simpler calls to more experiences 
agents. PLUS and it's a big PLUS folks get aggravated with the 
auto-attendant and just punch a button until they get a live voice.

So theY almost always ask what you want or how you can be helped or
whatever to make sure that 1) they can help your or 2) they know how
to route your call to someone who can.

Some notes about people working in these centers.

Many times they will NOT give out their name and if asked will give
out a "fake" name they use on a regular basis. They get enough "sex"
and other strange calls that they don't want someone tracking them
down.

No, they cannot do everything. Booking an international reservation
requires a lot of knowledge about how to check out the rules and make
sure they aren't selling you a ticket that can't be flown or that will
get the passenger immediately sent back on the airline's dime. My wife
is a baggage claims supervisor and it take about a year of handling
baggage claims to get to the point you know enough to deal with all
the possible issues.

As to being nice to everyone, they try. But after you've been lied to
5 or 10 calls in a row, your tone can get to be a bit jaded.

And as much as everyone hates auto-attendant systems, including us,
costs would go through the roof if they staffed for full service
answering all the time. Calls come in waves. Somewhat predicable but
with lots of day to day variation.

As a side note there was only two times in the last 20 years that the 
phones went totally silent. One was the OJ verdict. I forget the other.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:38:43 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Speed Dials


TELECOM Digest Editor wrote:

> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote on the topic of Speed Dials:

TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to Lisa Hancock:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Plus which, on (at least the older) AE
>> rotary dial phones, the dial would return 'faster' when you removed
>> your finger. WE dials pulsed and clicked their way back.  PAT]

>> The dial speed is about 10 pulses per second.  (A good modem manual
>> will tell you exactly the "contact make/break" times and the settings
>> for outside the U.S. as well).

>> Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
>> and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
>> out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
>> (on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

>> However, I think they realized this higher speed was rough on
>> equipment and did not provide it to the general public for that
>> reason.  I don't know if SxS could handle it but SxS components had
>> wear issues and certain improvements was rough on SxS unless it was
>> carefully spread out among switches within an office.

> I tried an experiment once with a Hayes modem and tone dialing. I kept
> setting the 'dialing speed' faster and faster on the modem so that
> eventually, instead of getting a faster and faster 'beep, beep, bloop'
> sound as it was 'dialing' or toning out its signal it got to where
> the modem was 'toning out' its signal in just two or three seconds
> total. Central office was still able to keep up with that pace on the
> touchtone speed, but then I set the modem to get it all out in about
> one or two seconds -- just an audible blur, no way for the naked ear
> to make anything out of it -- and then about half the time, my call
> 'could not be completed as dialed'. If I slowed it down just a pinch,
> so that ten digits still reached the central office in about three or
> four seconds, it always heard me and made the right connection. I did
> _not_ think touch tone signals could be interpreted that fast, but on
> ESS I guess they can be.   

> PAT

The original ESS circuits very likely couldn't keep up. But newer and
newer line cards (or whatever they call them) likely at some point
switched to DSP (digital signal processing) chips. This gives each
line the equivalent of a filter tied to a computer program to analyze
the signals coming in and very quickly pick the 2 tones being
generated.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:45:37 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity


I've quoted all of this before my comments at the end.
Michael Perry wrote:

> By Michael Perry

> Self-regulation in food and beverage marketing is being exploited and
> is failing to curb childhood obesity, research by a global obesity
> taskforce presented on Tuesday has found.

> The International Obesity Taskforce said some Internet sites that 
> attracted children with advertising games were being used to bypass 
> stricter advertising standards in traditional media, the 10th 
> International Congress on Obesity in Sydney heard.

> The taskforce found that 85 percent of businesses advertising to 
> children on television also had interactive Web sites for them.

> It said 12.2 million children had visited commercial Web sites
> promoting food and beverages over a three-month monitoring period in
> 2005.

> An analysis of this marketing found that food and beverage advertisers
> paid lip service to advertising codes of conduct. It said some Web
> sites pressure children to purchase before they played online games.

> "Viral marketing downloads and links from 'advergames' to corporate
> Web sites were against the spirit of the self-regulation system's
> provisions," researchers at Britain's Middlesex University in said.

> "While it is relatively easy to control the content of television and
> print advertising, controlling the content on online advertising and
> 'advergames' ... is a lot more complex."

> The taskforce has said an epidemic of obesity, now estimated at 1.5
> billion people worldwide, has led to more type 2 diabetes in obese
> children.

> "At the moment the need to protect children from commercial
> exploitation was being largely overlooked by the food and advertising
> industries," said Boyd Swinburn, president of the Australasian Society
> for the Study of Obesity.

> "We need to recognize that everyone in society has a responsibility to
> ensure we provide healthy environments for children," Swinburn told

> CITIES AT FAULT

> The week-long conference also heard that many children were "victims
> of poor urban designs" that discourage outdoor activity.

> "Many aspects of the physical environment present barriers to children
> from being outside and directly contribute to their declining levels
> of physical activity," said Dr Jo Salmon, Senior Research Fellow in
> the School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences at Deakin University in
> the Australian state of Victoria.

> "Small changes to urban design such as age-appropriate playground
> equipment ... could have a significant impact on overall activity
> levels across the day," she told the conference.

> Salmon said parental security and safety concerns that kept children
> at home were also limiting the physical activities of children and
> contributing to obesity.

> She said her research found 70 percent of five- to six-year-olds and
> 80 percent of 10- to 12-year-olds exceeded the recommended two-hour
> daily limit for Internet and television entertainment.

> "Children who know their neighbors and have strong social networks 
> within their neighborhood are much more likely to be active," she said.

> 
(The following is somewhat of a rant. Not yelling at the top of my voice 
but strident in my firm belief of my points.)

This should not be an issue. Turn off the TV, the computer, the video
game, and go out and play.

And what is this crock at to age appropriate playground. Why "experts"
don't like them, studies have found that kids play more when provide
with less "play things". When they have to "make it up" they do
better.  They more structure and "things" provided the less they play.

This is totally about parenting or really the lack there of.

(End of rant. But I reserve the right to bring it back in my replies
to replies to this. :) )

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:17:06 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Speed Dials


Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 11 Sep 2006 07:24:53 -0700 wrote:

>> The dial speed is about 10 pulses per second.  (A good modem manual
>> will tell you exactly the "contact make/break" times and the settings
>> for outside the U.S. as well).

>> Anyway, I believe panel switching and certainly crossbar and ESS could
>> and would accept 20 pulses per second.  Way back in HS a kid figured
>> out on his phone dial an adjustment to make it 20 p/s and it worked
>> (on either #1 xbar or panel).  PBX switchboards had 20 p/s dials.

>> However, I think they realized this higher speed was rough on
>> equipment and did not provide it to the general public for that
>> reason.

> Personally, I don't believe it caused any more wear and tear on
> equipment than what a 10 pps dial would make on the system.  Since
> panel, #1XB and #5XB all used common control and didn't do anything
> til the requisite amount of digits had been entered in the receiving
> registers likely could care less how fast the pulses came into the
> registers.  And I don't think it caused any more wear and tear than
> receiving MF or DTMF.

> I don't know if SxS could handle it but SxS components had
> wear issues and certain improvements was rough on SxS unless it was
> carefully spread out among switches within an office.

> Wear issues weren't likely the problem with 20 pps dials o n SXS.  The
> problem is that SXS systems cannot keep up with pulses as fast as 20
> pps.  It might work *sometimes* but for constant reliable service 20
> pps dials would not likely have enough reliability to be used.
 
> As for "why subscribers were never given 20 pps dial phones as a usual
> thing" my guess is that WECO never put that into widespread production
> so it wasn't made available as a standard dial in a standard 302 or
> 500 (whichever would have been in use at the time.)  When Touch-Tone
> (DTMF) came out in '64 it was a viable option that was going to
> eventually be implemented throughout the Bell System eventually.
> Whether this is the reason or not is only my speculation.

Until the 80s, phone gear was designed to last 30 or 40 years. That 
faster pulsing could have eaten into THAT time frame on the phone set. 
But I doubt it mattered much on the CO end.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #330
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Sep 13 18:32:40 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 9C1012203; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:32:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #331
Message-Id: <20060913223240.9C1012203@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:32:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 331

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Call for Papers: IAENG Intl Conference Computer Science-ICCS 2007 (imecs)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 13, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Apple Unveils Device to Link Online Content TV sets (USTelecom dailyLead)
    ACN (NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Mike Spencer)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Marc Haber)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Mark Atwood)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (Chris Farrar)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (Mark Crispin)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (Bill Michealson)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (Art Kamlet)
    Re: School Children Shrug Off Enmities in Cyberspace (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Speed Dials (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: imecs___2007@iaeng.org
Subject: Call For Papers: IAENG Intl Conference on Computer Science - ICCS 2007
Date: 13 Sep 2006 01:58:46 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


CFP: IAENG International Conference on Computer Science (ICCS 2007)

 From: International Association of Engineers
 
The 2007 IAENG International Conference on Computer Science
21-23 March, 2007, Hong Kong
http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2007/ICCS2007.html

The conference ICCS'07 is held under the International MultiConference
of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2007. The IMECS 2007 is organized
by the International Association of Engineers (IAENG), and serves as
good platforms for the engineering community members to meet with each
other and to exchange ideas. The last conference in 2006 has attracted
a total of over four hundred participants from over 30 countries.

All submitted papers will be under peer review and accepted papers
will be published in the conference proceeding (ISBN:
978-988-98671-4-0).  The abstracts will be indexed and available at
major academic databases. The accepted papers will also be considered
for publication in the special issues of the journal Engineering
Letters, in IAENG journals and in edited books.

Important Dates:

Draft Manuscript submission deadline: 12 December, 2006
Camera-Ready papers & Pre-registration due: 2 January, 2007
ICCS 2007: 21-23 March, 2007

Submission:

ICCS 2007 is now accepting manuscript submissions. Prospective authors
are invited to submit their draft paper in full paper (any appropriate
style) to imecs{at}iaeng.org by 12 December, 2006. The submitted file
can be in MS Word format, PS format, or PDF formats.

The first page of the draft paper should include:
(1) Title of the paper;
(2) Name, affiliation and e-mail address for each author;
(3) A maximum of 5 keywords of the paper.
Also, the name of the conference that the paper is being submitted to
should be stated in the email.

The topics of the ICCS'07 include, but not limited to, the following:

Theoretical computer science:
Algorithmic information theory
Computability theory
Cryptography
Formal semantics
Theory of computation
Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity
Logics and meanings of programs
Mathematical logic and Formal languages
Type theory

Hardware:
Control structures and Microprogramming
Arithmetic and Logic structures
Memory structures
Input/output and Data communications
Logic Design
Integrated circuits
VLSI design
Performance and reliability

Computer systems organization:
Computer architecture
Computer networks
Distributed computing
Performance of systems
Computer system implementation

Computing methodologies:
Symbolic and Algebraic manipulation
Artificial intelligence
Computer graphics
Image processing and computer vision
Pattern recognition
Speech recognition
Simulation and Modeling
Document and text processing
Digital signal processing
Computer applications:
Administrative data processing
Enterprise resource planning
Customer relationship management
Human Resource Management Systems
Mathematical software
Numerical analysis
Automated theorem proving
Computer algebra systems
Physical science and Engineering
Computational chemistry
Computational physics
Life and medical sciences
Bioinformatics
Computational biology
Medical informatics
Social and behavioral sciences
Computer-aided engineering
Robotics
Human-computer interaction
Speech synthesis
Usability engineering
Telecommunications
Queueing theory

ICCS Conference Co-Chairs and Committee Members:

Chin-Chen Chang
IEEE Fellow, IEE Fellow
Chair Professor in Department of Information Engineering and Computer
Science, Feng Chia University, Taiwan

Ching-Shun Chen
Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Da-Yeh University, Taiwan

Mei-Ching Chen
Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,
Tatung University, Taiwan

Orville Leverne Clubb (co-chair)
Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science
City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Chun-I Fan
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

G. Ganesan (co-chair)
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Jayaprakash Narayan College of Engineering, India

I-Shyan Hwang
Associate professor in the Department of Computer Engineering & Science
Yuan-Ze University, Taiwan

Jahwan Koo
Research Professor at Intelligent HCI Convergence Research Center,
School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan
University, South Korea

Dr. Tadahiko Kumamoto
Senior Researcher, Computational Linguistics Group,
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan

Ko-Chi Kuo
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

Jiann-Shu Lee (co-chair)
Associate Professor, Academic Director of the Biomedical Engineering
Society
Information and Learning Technology
National University of Tainan, Taiwan

Xueliang Li (co-chair)
Deputy Director and Professor
Center for Combinatorics, Nankai University, China

Cha-Hwa Lin (co-chair)
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Sun-Yat Sen University, Taiwan

Dr. Elsa M. Macias Lopez (co-chair)
Dept. of Telematic Engineering,
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University, Spain

Javier Montero
Associate Professor at the Department of Statistics and Operational
Research I,
Faculty of Mathematics, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

S. Ayse OZALP
Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering,
Engineering and Architecture Faculty, Uludag University, Turkey

Vrijendra Singh
Faculty Associate, Department of Computer Science,
Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad, India

Lin-Yu Tseng
Professor, Department of Computer Science
National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

Toyohide Watanabe (co-chair)
Professor of Department of Systems and Social Informatics &
Director in Information Technology Center,
Nagoya University, Japan

Jiunn-Lin Wu
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science,
National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

Wei Yen
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Director of Industrial Cooperation Section
Tatung University, Taiwan

Kun-Ming Yu (co-chair)
Associate Professor and Dean, College of Computer Science and
Informatics
Chung Hua University, Taiwan
Editor in Chief, Journal of Information Technology and Applications

More details about the IMECS 2007 can be found at:
http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2007/index.html

More details about the International Association of Engineers, the
journal Engineering Letters and the IAENG International Journal of
Computer Science can be found at:
http://www.iaeng.org/about_IAENG.html
http://www.engineeringletters.com http://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/index.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 13, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:08:14 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 13, 2006
********************************

UPC Slovakia Launches VoIP, Moves into Triple-Play
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19851?11228

     Slovakia's leading cable operator, UPC Slovakia, part of the U.S.
     cable TV giant Liberty Global, has launched internet telephony
     services (VoIP). The offering complements its existing cable TV and
     broadband internet services. The VoIP service is currently only
     available in the capital, Bratislava; other cities and towns in which
     the ...

British Regs Propose Lower Wholesale Mobile-Termination Fees
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19848?11228

     British telecoms regulator Ofcom today proposed plans to cut
     wholesale mobile termination charges, a move that would lead to a
     drop in the prices that mobile operators charge for connecting
     calls made from rival networks or landlines. Ofcom wants the new
     rules-to include both 2G and 3G calls-to apply once existing
     regulations expire in ...

First True Quantum Cryptographic Network Claimed
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19845?11228

     Securing network data is one of the top challenges facing telecom
     researchers. "The volume and type of sensitive information being
     transmitted over data networks continues to grow at a remarkable
     pace," says Prem Kumar, a professor of electrical engineering
     and computer science at Northwestern University's Robert R ....

ABC, NBC, CBS And Now ... AT&T
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19840?11228

     For those who still believe watching TV on the smallest of
     screens is the consummate waste of time and money, keep reading:
     Ma Bell has just thrown her support behind the medium. Earlier
     today, San Antonio-based AT&T and Emeryville, Calif.-based MobiTV
     Inc., told the world they will partner to offer mobile TV to
     broadband users ...
     
Cingular, Nokia Introduce Wireless E-Mail Device
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19837?11228

     Nokia is rolling out the Nokia E62 wireless e-mail device in an effort
     to make wireless e-mail more of a mass market application. The device
     will be available exclusively in the U.S. from Cingular Wireless.
     The E62 supports a host of personal and business e-mail platforms
     such as Good Mobile Messaging, BlackBerry Connect, Cingular ...

Mobility, Version 2.0
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19834?11228

     LOS ANGELES -- CTIA Wireless IT and Entertainment 2006 -- Midway
     through a period of increasing IT investment, enterprises are moving
     from early wireless deployments focused on increasing efficiency and
     lowering costs to second-phase programs that will transform business
     processes, according to a panel of CIOs at CTIA Wireless IT and ...

Regulator Orders Deutsche Telekom to Open German High-speed Network
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19831?11228

     BERLIN --&nbsp;Regulators on Wednesday gave Deutsche Telekom AG
     three months to open its new high-speed communications network to
     rivals.  The company must offer a standard contract at a price
     agreed on with regulators so that competitors can easily access
     its VDSL network, the Federal Network Agency said.  Deutsche
     Telekom, the ...

Covad Unveils Web-Based Phone System
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/110/19827?11228

     NEW YORK -- Broadband provider Covad Communications Group Inc. is
     launching an inexpensive Internet-based phone system for very
     small companies that is compatible with conventional telephones.
     The new service targets a market segment with limited options for
     affordable office communications technology. Covad ClearEdge ...

CTIA: We Want Our MobileTV
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19824?11228

     LOS ANGELES -- CTIA Wireless IT and Entertainment 2006 -- Ask a
     dozen folks how delivering IPTV over mobile devices is going to
     work, and you will get a dozen answers.  At least that's the
     impression left behind here, where so-called mobile TV was
     perhaps top of the list of buzz and bottom of the list of
     reality.  One company ...


Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:36:37 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Apple Unveils Device to Link Online Content to TV Sets


USTelecom dailyLead
September 13, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eucYfDtusXbZnoixrB

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Apple unveils device to link online content to TV sets
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* AT&T beefs up applications services portfolio with USi acquisition
* RCN, out of bankruptcy, looks for buyer
* Broadwing, XO reportedly discussing merger
* NBC Universal launches new unit for online video
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies  Tuesday, Sept. 19, 1:0=
0 p.m. ET
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Report: 3G users to top 1B by 2010
* Yahoo! to offer sports stats on TV via deal with Intel
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC: Vacant TV airwaves could be available for use by 2009
* Broadcasters, tech industry at odds over TV treaty
* NYC taps Northrop Grumman for wireless emergency network
DIVERSIONS
* Apple Plans to Inhabit Living Room
* On View: Picassos by the Score
* After Conquering  'Chicago,' It's On to Motown
* Sydney: Blue Sydney
* Would You Like Fries With That Monopoly Game?

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eucYfDtusXbZnoixrB

------------------------------

From: NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us
Subject: ACN
Date: 13 Sep 2006 11:51:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Last mention of the company here in Pat's group seems to be
Sun, Jun 5 2005.

Anyone have current info?

A friend is getting involved with them, and it seems like a pyramid
scheme to me.

They seem to be more interested in getting reps than in selling product.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
From: Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere>
Organization: Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop
Date: 13 Sep 2006 02:09:12 -0300


<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Many companies today answer their phone with a long winded answer.  As
> a customer, I find it annoying and distracting.  Which do you think is
> best?

> a) "Jones & Co."

> b) "Good morning, Jones & Co."

Taking into account the aging population, not to mention younger
people with hearing loss from loud music, a) is too short.  People
hard of hearing need a few words to accommodate to the the speaker's
voice and a little redundancy to make sure that what they think they
heard is what they heard.  So b) is much better.

> c) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I direct your call?"

Meets the criteria for the hard of hearing but a bit silly to thank me
for calling til they know what I have to say.  And I don't need John's
name if he's just going to pass me on to another number.

> d) "Thank you for calling Jones & Co, this is John Smith speaking, how
> may I give you the best customer service ever today?"

Gak.  Hang up now.  Call somebody else.

Mike Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada

------------------------------

From: Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam0339@zugschl.us>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:24:34 +0200
Organization: private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details


mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote:

> To be precise, here's how it goes:

> "This is M... C..., how can I help you?"

> (long pause)  "Uh..."  (long pause)  "Is this M... C...?"

> "Just what I said.  How can I help you?"

> "Uh... uh..."

> I presume telemarketers are only trained to talk, not to comprehend
> speech.

Chances are that the telemarketer didn't hear your first sentence
because the predictive dialer took too long to connect her.

Greetings,

Marc

Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse in Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:35:50 -0400 DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> wrote:

> At the major airline call center where my wife works in baggage
> claims, they tend to start with a story and if not cut off can take
> 5 or 10 minutes telling this story which may or may not, usually
> not, be germane to the reason for the call.

This may be fine for an airline call center, but like all nasty habits
it's spread to *everything* without need and no real reason to do it
other than they think "commercializing" answering calls makes them
more "professional."

This is about just as desirable as those stupid popups you now see on
TV programs telling us what's going to be on in the next hour, the
next week or the next year.  Infiinitely annoying and hardly helpful
at all.

> And as much as everyone hates auto-attendant systems, including us,
> costs would go through the roof if they staffed for full service
> answering all the time. Calls come in waves. Somewhat predicable but
> with lots of day to day variation.

It's funny that people got along just fine for *years* without auto
attendants and being handled by a real person.  Auto attendants and
IVRs especially when planned badly as some are that force you to go
through countless obstacles when you really need to speak to a real
person are crazy.  The people who design these auto attendants and
IVRs should use some common sense.  It shouldn't be not obvious that
if you want to speak to a real person you should be able to press 0 or
just not say anything and time out to a real person.  Countless times
I've tried to let it time out and instead of being transferred to
someone who can help me the designers of the system think it's better
to just drop the call.  TS for you!  If I'm on an IVR and the IVR
cannot understand "operator" there's something really wrong in the
design of a system.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
From: Mark Atwood <me@mark.atwood.name>
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:20:31 GMT


DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> writes:

> As a side note there was only two times in the last 20 years that the 
> phones went totally silent. One was the OJ verdict. I forget the other.

The morning of 9/11 I am betting.

Mark Atwood                 When you do things right, people won't be sure
me@mark.atwood.name         you've done anything at all.
http://mark.atwood.name/   http://fallenpegasus.livejournal.com/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:15:22 -0400
From: Chris Farrar <cfarrar@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?


njem <njem@hughes.net> wrote to ask:
 > Subject: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
 > Date: 12 Sep 2006 16:31:12 -0700

> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

Dumb Question:  Are they paying for  Caller ID with  name?  Some phone
companies have two levels of caller  id, one is number only, the other
name and number.  Rogers cellular makes the name option extra $$$ over
just the number.

Also, some of the 1st caller id phones aren't capable of displaying
name and number Nortel Maestro leaps to mind.

Chris

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <mrc@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:08:46 -0700
Organization: University of Washington


On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, njem wrote:

> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

If you are talking about display of caller ID on a cell phone, the cell 
phone network does not transmit name.  If a name is displayed in caller ID 
on a cell phone, that is because you have the name and number in your cell 
phone's phonebook.

Also, cell phone subscribers often do not have their names in the database 
for caller ID names that are transmitted to wireline phones.  Often the 
name in the database is the name of the company, or "wireless caller", or 
the name of the city where the phone is registered.  A few companies will 
register names.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

------------------------------

From: Bill Michaelson <bill@cosi.com>
Subject: Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:16:29 GMT


njem wrote:

> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

Essentially the number is passed from the service provider where the
call originates.  The receiving service provider must look up the name
in a directory.  Some do, some don't.

------------------------------

From: kamlet@panix.com (Arthur Kamlet)
Subject: Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks Corp.


In article <telecom25.330.4@telecom-digest.org>, njem
<njem@hughes.net> wrote:

> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

Name is a billable option that can be added to caller id.

Your phone company offers a) caller id, or for higher cost,

b) caller id with name.

You get what you pay for.

Art Kamlet     ArtKamlet @ AOL.com   Columbus OH    K2PZH

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: School Children Shrug Off Enmities in Cyberspace
Date: 13 Sep 2006 07:09:11 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Kevin Smith wrote:

> Cyberspace get-togethers between schoolchildren in British-ruled
> Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic are helping break down decades
> of mistrust and could provide a model for young people in conflict
> zones elsewhere.

I'm all for such programs, but I am very wary of their success.  There
are other issues at play in peaceful group interaction.

For years various ethnic groups lived side by side in hotspot
countries.  The strong govt changes and the groups revert to their old
viscious violence, such as in former Yugoslavia and Iraq.

I know of increased prejudice and trouble when previously separate
youth ethnic groups get mixed together, sadly to say.

The theory "if we only got to know each other we'd get along" is by no
means the saviour.  In WW II Americans the Soviet soldiers got along
great to win the war but hostilities arose immediately afterwards,
thanks to Stalin.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole
Date: 13 Sep 2006 07:16:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Paul F. Roberts wrote:

> Some of those fears were confirmed when reports surfaced, just days
> after the Aug. 8 patch release, that computers infected with malicious
> IRC 'bot' programs

Some questions about today's technology:

What is a "bot" program, as opposed to other kinds of computer
programs?

What allows and causes a foreign unauthorized program to start
execution on a computer where it doesn't belong?  In other words, who
presses the start button on a supposedly personal computer to run
sabotage?   I don't understand how some external person can gain
control of my computer, as if my neighbor could drive my automobile
from his kitchen window.

> were scanning the Internet for Windows
> systems that had the MS06-040 vulnerability

What allows a private computer to be scanned by external means (like
Spock using his scanners on a planet far below) so that its internal
software may be examined and manipulated?

> and then using publicly available code

Who wrote such code?

Lastly, why do such vulnerabilities exist in the first place?  I keep
reading how the present Windows operating system is old; shouldn't all
the necessary fixes be developed by now?

How much does it cost for companies to keep applying these patches
every week?

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage
Date: 13 Sep 2006 07:28:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> Here in Seattle pay phones have been 50 cents untimed for several
> years now.  Prior to that they were 35 cents for about a month!  Prior
> to that they were 25 cents.  The telcos in their infite wisdom decided
> that the competition from cellphones was a good reason to double the
> rate for pay phones.

Around the time the payphone was 35c they were deregulated by the
government, meaning a payphone owner could charge whatever he wanted,
from 5c to $1 or more.  Some of this resulted from competition from
privately owned payphones.

The cost of communications equipped overall has reduced the cost of
telephone service.  Pay phones are an exception.  Due to vandalism, the
phones require more protective steel and that makes them expensive.
The cost of labor to retrieve the coin box is expensive.  The greatly
increased use of 800 numbers and alternate reduced long distance
revenues.  Payphones were declining already, the widespread use of
cellphones only accelerated that trend.

> As far as using or not using your cellphone, well at least for me my
> cellphone is for *my* convenience.  Why have a cellphone if you don't
> use it?

For emergencies, particularly while driving, e.g. car break down.

My $20/month cell phone is free nights and weekends in my local area
(which is rather large).  However, NYC is outside my local area
("roaming") and I was there during peak times, so the per minute cost
would be rather high compared to a pay phone.

If I paid $40/month I could get a cellphone with free day and roam
calling, but it's not worth the extra $20 for the limited times I
would use it.  I considered the pay as you go plans but they are much
less convenient and not much of a saving.

> I think it's required at least when the phone is put in that
> directories be available.

I can't speak for that state, but not much is required these days for
telephone services.

> AT&T was the only carrier that would place coin sent paid calls
> inter-LATA.  AT&T stopped handling sent paid inte-LATA calls several
> years ago from CO controlled pay phones.  Intra-LATA calls (at least
> in Qwest territory) can still be made sent coin paid.  On the
> "Millennium" smart pay phones you can make sent paid inter-LATA calls.
> AT&T evidently doesn't want to handle inter-LATA calls if operators
> are involved at all.

Well the Verizon pay phones in NYC offered coin long distance.  Who is
handling the cross LATA long distance calls?  Who is asking for and
controlling the coin deposit?

P.S.  I don't know if I mentioned, but the instruction card said
$1/minute, 4 minute minimum.  But when I dialed a call, it asked for
$1.05.  I don't know why it wanted the extra nickel.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Speed Dials
Date: 13 Sep 2006 09:29:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Sam Spade wrote:

> As I recall, operators had dials that did 20 pps.

I only saw one PBX switchboard with fast dials (at a large hospital),
all other cord boards I've seen had plain dials, very rarely a Touch
Tone keypad.

Pat, do you recall what kind of dials your hospital job had?

Central office operators had push button dials which were developed
around the late 1940s, though some were from the 1920s (such as manual
to panel).

The transmission signal protocols from one central office to another
varied over time  for both local and long distance and by office type.
I believe from the Bell System history that the switchgear for the
operator would automatically transmit the appropriate protocol from
push button dials; this was handled by the trunk circuit.  These
buttons were arranged in two rows of five.  Central office operators in
low use boards might have real dials.

As an aside, I understand a supplemental automation for cord boards
came out in the 1970s to extend their life.  [If anyone knows more
details would you share it with us?] Cords were still used, but the
dial was replaced by a series of modern keys and digital readout and I
suspect they had automatic AMA and routing built in.  I saw a photo of
a huge C.O. cord board of 1970 and it appeared most operators were
making mark-sense notations, not doing connections, and they had only
a few cord pairs at each position.  Basically those operators were
more billing clerks than connectors.  If the new system could handle
AMA by key recording calling and called number and the times it would
be a big saving over writing tickets.  Filling in those circles is
tedious and slow; it's like taking the SATs all day long every day.

Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> Personally, I don't believe it caused any more wear and tear on
> equipment than what a 10 pps dial would make on the system.  Since
> panel, #1XB and #5XB all used common control and didn't do anything
> til the requisite amount of digits had been entered in the receiving
> registers likely could care less how fast the pulses came into the
> registers.  And I don't think it caused any more wear and tear than
> receiving MF or DTMF.

That's correct for common control systems.  It required only relay
operation, not moving parts.

> Wear issues weren't likely the problem with 20 pps dials o n SXS.  The
> problem is that SXS systems cannot keep up with pulses as fast as 20
> pps.  It might work *sometimes* but for constant reliable service 20
> pps dials would not likely have enough reliability to be used.

I'm pretty sure from the history that SxS could be sped up to
accomodate 20 pps but wear was an issue since the moving parts were
moving at a higher speed.  SxS switches required periodic servicing and
adjustment; the failure to do so led to some of the service crises of
the 1970s outside of NYC.

IBM had the same speed limiting problem with its electric accounting
tab machines.  They tried speeding up the machines (customers
desperately needed higher speed) but wear became a serious problem and
maintenance and downtime got too high.  The real solution was
electronic computers and a completely redesigned printing using a
chain intead of typewheels or typebars.  IBM's highly successful 1401
computer was actually a mechanical engineering masterpiece because of
its revolutionary high speed yet clear 1403 printer.  The 1403
continued onto System/360 and S/370 machines for many years.  I never
could understand why IBM's competitors would market printers with
jagged lines and uneven impressions long after the 1403 set a new
standard of high speed print quality.

> As for "why subscribers were never given 20 pps dial phones as a usual
> thing" my guess is that WECO never put that into widespread production
> so it wasn't made available as a standard dial in a standard 302 or
> 500 (whichever would have been in use at the time.)  When Touch-Tone
> (DTMF) came out in '64 it was a viable option that was going to
> eventually be implemented throughout the Bell System eventually.
> Whether this is the reason or not is only my speculation.

I don't know the underlying reasons but I guess that Bell didn't want
some customers to have a high speed dial when others would not in the
same town.  Actually a high speed dial would more efficiently use the
expensive common control logic of panel and crossbar and ESS without
any expense on their end.  (Touch Tone required receivers and initially
they were expensive).  Maybe they were afraid of more dialing errors or
wanted system-wide standardization.  Maybe the fast pulses didn't
transmit well on long loops from the C.O.

As mentioned, a friend jimmied his 500 set to become a 20 pps dial, so
it appears it wasn't an issue of production.  (How he did it I don't
know.)

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: All the switchboards I worked on always
had the fast (20) dials. And in the two instances where the board had
touchtone dialing, the operator's headset muted out the tones so the
operator did not go crazy from the bleep, bleep, boop tones all day.
PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #331
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Sep 13 23:47:20 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 03F4121FA; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #332
Message-Id: <20060914034719.03F4121FA@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:48:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 332

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    NBC to Offer New Shows on Internet (Reuters News Wire)
    Skype Introduces Video Calling for Macintosh Users; Cross (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (DLR)
    Re: ACN (FreedomFireCom)
    Just What Is DSL?? (FreedomFireCom)
    Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Anthony Bellanga)
    Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (DLR)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:11:58 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: NBC to Offer New Shows on Internet to Help Build Audiences


NBC Universal said on Wednesday it will offer episodes of some of its
new prime-time shows for free online viewing on personal computers in
a bid to build an audience for its fall schedule.

NBC will stream the first four episodes of comedies "30 Rock" and
"Twenty Good Years," and the first eight episodes of dramas
"Kidnapped," "Friday Night Lights," "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip"
and "Heroes" on its ad-supported broadband player at NBC.com.

Each episode will appear on the site after it airs on NBC and will be
available for a week, said Jeff Gaspin, president of NBC Universal
Cable Entertainment, Digital Content and Cross-Network Strategy.

"We are looking to reach as many people as possible and to get as much
sampling (of shows) as possible for the new series," Gaspin said on
Wednesday. "This is an experiment with us. We are just committing
through November sweeps now."

NBC.com also will host live blogs with the creators, producers or cast
for every show following its premiere on NBC, which is owned by
General Electric Co..

A high-resolution, large-format version of NBC's broadband player,
called NBC/24, will relaunch on October 1.

Gaspin said the primary goal of the broadband player was to attract
new viewers. He said the network could decide to offer more episodes
through its new broadband distribution venture, NBC Broadband Co.

The network set up NBC Broadband, known as nbbc, to distribute and
profit from its content on the Internet by providing video clips for
free to Web sites, including those of NBC affiliates, in exchange for
a cut of advertising sales.

The Walt Disney Co. also announced on Wednesday that it will offer
episodes of seven of its fall shows on an ad-supported broadband
player that it tested over the summer.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:37:51 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Skype Introduces Video Calling for Macintosh Users; Cross


     Skype Introduces Video Calling for Macintosh Users; Cross
     Platform Support Lets Mac and Windows Users See Each Other with
     Free Video Calls
     - Sep 13, 2006 07:00 AM (BusinessWire)

LUXEMBOURG, Sep 13, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) --

Skype, the global Internet communications company, has
released the beta version of its popular communications software,
Skype for Mac 2.0, which gives any Mac user with an Internet
connection the ability to make free video calls to anyone else on
Skype(TM) regardless of whether they use the Windows or Mac platform.
Skype's new cross platform support allows its extensive international
community of more than 113 million users to make free video calls to
people across the globe using both Windows and Macintosh computers.

Mac users can now enjoy one-on-one video calls, viewed within the
Skype window or on the full computer screen. Skype video for Mac also
includes a small window for users to view how they appear to the
person they are calling. Connecting seamlessly across Windows and Mac
operating systems, Skype for Mac with video offers users free,
high-quality video calling regardless of platform. This means that,
for the first time ever, Mac users can connect with and view friends,
family and colleagues using Windows without downloading any additional
software.

     - http://www.quote.com/home/news/story.asp?story=61099938

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:42:24 GMT
From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Organization: Disorganized


In message <telecom25.331.10@telecom-digest.org> Mark Crispin
<mrc@cac.washington.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, njem wrote:

>> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
>> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
>> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
>> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
>> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

> If you are talking about display of caller ID on a cell phone, the cell 
> phone network does not transmit name.  If a name is displayed in caller ID 
> on a cell phone, that is because you have the name and number in your cell 
> phone's phonebook.

That depends on your cell phone.  My Rogers GSM Motorola Razr receives
both names and numbers on inbound calls.

If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:23:55 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


Mark Atwood wrote:

> DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> writes:

>> As a side note there was only two times in the last 20 years that
>> the phones went totally silent. One was the OJ verdict. I forget the other.

> The morning of 9/11 I am betting.

No. Quite busy that day and much more so the next week or so. When you
put a few planes full of people down in the wrong city due to weather
or such, calls go up. When you put almost every plane down in the
"wrong" place, well things got just a wee bit busy for a while for
those on the phone lines. Mandatory overtime as I recall.

The other time was something similar to the OJ verdict. Something that
obviously was the front page of People and US. :)

Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:35:50 -0400 DLR <news23@raleighthings.com> wrote:

>> At the major airline call center where my wife works in baggage
>> claims, they tend to start with a story and if not cut off can take
>> 5 or 10 minutes telling this story which may or may not, usually
>> not, be germane to the reason for the call.

> This may be fine for an airline call center, but like all nasty habits
> it's spread to *everything* without need and no real reason to do it
> other than they think "commercializing" answering calls makes them
> more "professional."

Actually no. I've been involved in several small businesses where
things got to the point where the 3 line phones on everyone's desk
weren't cutting it anymore. As the business grows they get to a point
where everyone is interrupted to answer the phone and it usually isn't
for them which means interrupting someone else to see if they can take
the call or taking a message and passing it on. At that point the
business has a choice. Hire a secretary or buy a phone system with an
automated attendant. Secretaries cost real money. Every day. Auto
attendants cost once. Most folks who don't need a constant greeter at
the door go the AA route. The biggest problem is so many businesses do
this very badly.  Which I think is your real complaint.

Now doing this for a doctors office just doesn't make sense. But for
many businesses AA are a no brainer.

> This is about just as desirable as those stupid popups you now see on
> TV programs telling us what's going to be on in the next hour, the
> next week or the next year.  Infiinitely annoying and hardly helpful
> at all.

>> And as much as everyone hates auto-attendant systems, including us,
>> costs would go through the roof if they staffed for full service
>> answering all the time. Calls come in waves. Somewhat predicable but
>> with lots of day to day variation.

> It's funny that people got along just fine for *years* without auto
> attendants and being handled by a real person.  Auto attendants and
> IVRs especially when planned badly as some are that force you to go
> through countless obstacles when you really need to speak to a real
> person are crazy.  The people who design these auto attendants and
> IVRs should use some common sense.  It shouldn't be not obvious that
> if you want to speak to a real person you should be able to press 0 or
> just not say anything and time out to a real person.  Countless times
> I've tried to let it time out and instead of being transferred to
> someone who can help me the designers of the system think it's better
> to just drop the call.  TS for you!  If I'm on an IVR and the IVR
> cannot understand "operator" there's something really wrong in the
> design of a system.

Well in the airline industry the cost of an airline ticket (in
adjusted dollars) was much more back then to deal with all the
employee costs of fully staffing. And if you had any idea of how messy
it was for them to sell and TRACK tickets and seats on flight back
then before call centers and computers, well, today no airline would
exist that was bigger than 1/20 of their size today. By the early 60s
they were in a crisis of being unable to handle any more growth.

The main point being AA systems (and other things) allow them to sell
you a ticket coast to coast that a middle class family can afford to
buy for a vacation.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: One other time that phones 'quit
ringing' for a few hours was the Sunday night in July, 1969
when the three astronauts landed on the moon.  _Everyone_ was watching
Walter Cronkite sit there in stunned silence trying to describe it.
PAT]

------------------------------

From: FreedomFireCom <melemm@cognisurf.com>
Subject: Re: ACN
Date: 13 Sep 2006 18:42:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


You're correct.  Their emphasis is on "recruiting" and most money
earned comes from "recruiting bonuses".  They're also about $500 to
start plus a bunch of other required recurring fees.

A better option is a company called Cognigen.  They're focus is
selling product and they have zero required costs.  You sell product
they pay you.  No pay to play either.  You can see more about them
here: http://mscprez.ld.net

God Bless,
Michael Lemm
Freedomfire Communications
http://DS3-Bandiwdth.com

NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us wrote:

> Last mention of the company here in Pat's group seems to be
> Sun, Jun 5 2005.

> Anyone have current info?

> A friend is getting involved with them, and it seems like a pyramid
> scheme to me.

> They seem to be more interested in getting reps than in selling product.

------------------------------

From: FreedomFireCom <melemm@cognisurf.com>
Subject: Just What Is DSL??
Date: 13 Sep 2006 18:45:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Recently posted this to my blog Broadband Nation.  Covers most
everything on DSL that anyway may want to know ... or need to.

You can read the article here:

http://broadband-nation.blogspot.com/2006/09/just-what-is-dsl.html


God Bless,
Michael Lemm
FreedomFire Communications
http://DS3-Bandwidth.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:51:04 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@gonestraighttohell.com>
Reply-To: no-spam@no-spam.no-spam
Subject: Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage


********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.
********************************************************************

Lisa Hancock <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>

>> AT&T was the only carrier that would place coin sent paid calls
>> inter-LATA. AT&T stopped handling sent paid inter-LATA calls
>> several years ago from CO controlled pay phones. Intra-LATA calls
>> (at least in Qwest territory) can still be made sent coin paid.
>> On the "Millennium" smart pay phones you can make sent paid
>> inter-LATA calls. AT&T evidently doesn't want to handle inter-LATA
>> calls if operators are involved at all.

> Well the Verizon pay phones in NYC offered coin long distance. Who
> is handling the cross LATA long distance calls? Who is asking for
> and controlling the coin deposit?

When was the last time you saw 1+ coin service from those Verizon coin
phones in New York City? AT&T Long Distance discontinued 1+ sent-paid
coin from traditional telco CO controlled payphones during 2002/03.

As Joe mentions, in Qwest (legacy US West, an RBOC) territory out
west, the Nortel manufactured "Millennium" smart "super" payphones,
with card swipes, touch-a-carrier buttons, LCD displays, etc. allow
sent-paid coin toll calls outside of the LATA, but these "smart" or
"super" payphones are NOT traditional CO controlled
payphones. Instead, they have smart-chips inside, similar to private
COCOT payphones.

Many RBOCs have been retro-fitting traditional "looking" payphones
originally made by AT&T's Western Electric, and many independent LECs
have been retro-fitting their traditional "looking" Automatic Electric
payphones and Northern Telecom traditional Centurian payphones, with
internal "smart-chips". Sometimes these phones act completely as a
private "COCOT" payphone. Other times, they can act as a "hybrid",
where local and telco-handled intra-LATA toll coin service is handled
more or less traditionally, by the telco central office controls as
well as the telco's Operator switch, usually a Nortel TOPS, sometimes
a Lucent OSPS, but then inter-LATA coin toll calls would be handled
strictly by the internal "smart" chips.

When internal "smart" chips handle the 1+ and maybe even 011+ IDDD
coin sent paid service, it really doesn't "matter" who the LD company
carrying that call happens to be. It could even be AT&T, but it isn't
being handled by AT&T through their Operator OSPS switches in the way
they used to prior to 2002/03. It is rather handled as any "standard
non-coin" 1+ call would be handled, only that the internal smart chips
quote, count, collect, etc. the coin deposits, just like a private
COCOT payphone would do.

And those VZ payphones in NYCity -- what are you defining as Long
Distance? If the call is multi-zone or intra-LATA toll, VZ could still
be handling those calls in the "traditional" sense, by the CO as well
as by their Operator TOPS switch, for coin-paid calls to Long Island
516 and 631, Westchester 914 and other upriver counties in 845, Byram
and Greenwich CT 203 which has been VZ/NYTel for decades, and even
"corridor" intra-LATA calls to VZ/NJBell for a handful of nearby
Jersey counties across the Hudson River.

The latter is similar to your southwestern New Jersey / southeastern
Pennsylvania corridor option that VZ Bell Atlantic (NJBell, Bell of
PA) has provided when AT&T and the BOCs were separated with the 1984
divestiture.

But for inter-LATA toll 1+ coin calls (outside of that limited NY/NJ
corridor), AT&T won't handle those types of long distance calls
anymore, at least not in the "traditional" 1+ coin way of doing
things.  If VZ payphones can still be used to place such calls, then
it is being handled by some kind of internal COCOT-like "smart" chips,
regardless of who the actual LD carrier happens to be. And its also
possible that VZ had completely retrofitted their traditional
"looking" payphones to be completely operated as if it were a COCOT,
with internal "smart" chips, even for local, multi-zone, intra-LATA
toll, NY/NJ "corridor" coin calls, as well as inter-LATA and possibly
even 011+ international coin calls.

Incidentally, I think that a lot of foreign countries around the world
have had their payphones operate by internal "mechanical counters" for
decades. This would be a predecessor to the COCOT-like internal "smart
chips" that have been used in the US with COCOTs since the early and
mid-1980s, and even in Canada with Nortel "Millennium" super
payphones, and also Canadian COCOTs since the late-1990s. I don't
think that most "other" countries ever really had true CO controlled
payphones in the way the US and Canada had known them. And even in the
US and Canada, telcos in smaller towns and rural areas used to have
"post-pay" coin service even in recent years as well!

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:13:35 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Paul F. Roberts wrote:

>> Some of those fears were confirmed when reports surfaced, just days
>> after the Aug. 8 patch release, that computers infected with malicious
>> IRC 'bot' programs.

> Some questions about today's technology:
> What is a "bot" program, as opposed to other kinds of computer
> programs?

It is a slang term for a program that runs in the background and take
"orders" from somewhere else on the Internet. Short for robot. If you
have one, someone else controls your computer. Typically they let you
think you still have control and just use it to do their dirty work
without (they hope) you knowing what's going on. Like someone taking
your car each night from 1 am to 4 am to delivery drugs.

> What allows and causes a foreign unauthorized program to start
> execution on a computer where it doesn't belong?  In other words, who
> presses the start button on a supposedly personal computer to run
> sabotage?   I don't understand how some external person can gain
> control of my computer, as if my neighbor could drive my automobile
> from his kitchen window.

Your neighbor CAN get your keyless entry code from his kitchen window 
with the right radio scanner widgets and then install things at night 
that might cause your car to do all sorts of things.

Three main ways.

1. You are on the Internet without a router or with one but not behind
a NAT setup which means you are exposed to the outside world. There
are large number of computers probing EVERY address possible on the
Internet to see if you respond. In a perfect world your computer would
ignore these probes. But due to bugs in the various operating systems
it is possible to find a bug that allows data sent in the probe to
overwrite part of the OS and when that section of the OS is used the
injected code takes over. Typically at this point it a very small
program that calls home and downloads a larger program, hides it in
your disk, sets things up to run at startup, then idles in the
background waiting for "orders".  And does all of this in a way such
that you don't notice it happening.

2. You visit a web site or read an email that does basically the same
as #1 but is based on bugs in your Internet browsing software. The web
site (or AD on the web site) or email contains HTML code that exploits
a bug and allows code to be inserted into your system.

3. Social engineering is where a pop up or email says click here and
you WIN, GET, etc ... a million, prize, etc... and what you are
clicking is a program (often disguised as a graphic) which install a
BOT on your computer.

>> were scanning the Internet for Windows systems that had the
>> MS06-040 vulnerability

> What allows a private computer to be scanned by external means (like
> Spock using his scanners on a planet far below) so that its internal
> software may be examined and manipulated?

Alluding to the above, if you are connected to the Internet without a
router doing NAT you're exposed. This protects you from the equivalent
of folks walking down the street ringing doorbells and seeing which
doors are not locked and people not home. The lock is being behind NAT
and/or having a fully patched system with no known exploits. But the
later is hard as the people looking for exploits to do bad do not
advertise them when they find them.

If you surf you may be exposed. The only way to stop this is to
disable java, activex, javascript, etc ... Which in todays web, makes
for a very restricted experience.

>> and then using publicly available code

> Who wrote such code?

Kids who were having fun seeing what they could do at first. But now
mostly thieves or folks paid by thieves to find such things. To be
blunt, they do it because there's money to be made and they don't have
a problem stealing for gain.

> Lastly, why do such vulnerabilities exist in the first place?  I keep
> reading how the present Windows operating system is old; shouldn't all
> the necessary fixes be developed by now?

Modern OS's have 10s of millions of lines of code. People buy
features.  They don't buy future security problems. All those systems
designed with security as the first gaol fell on the junk heap of
computing past and continue to do so. Well except for some very
special cases where market share and cost doesn't mater. But even the
NSA finds it cheaper to build totally isolated rooms, and I mean
totally, to run software on insecure systems than try and develop
custom things that are secure from the ground up. And they will likely
have holes also, just not as many. Maybe.

But the basic issue with Windows (and all OS's after a while) is that
it has to support old ancient programs plus new stuff and the code
base is a mess. You don't really fix code like this. You do you best
to apply what can be charitably called a permanent band aid. Been
there. Done that. Got the pay stubs. (Not for windows but this is an
issue that will not go away.)

> How much does it cost for companies to keep applying these patches
> every week?

LOT. Keeps me employed. Well not totally but is a PITA for me and I 
mostly admin macs. But have to deal with enough windows systems that it 
takes way too much time to deal with them. The windows systems that I 
support are for very specialized systems and the people running them 
have specific rules about what they can and cannot do.

What people do not realize is that an off the shelf Windows or Mac
system with MS Office, Email, web surfing, iTunes, etc... is a more
complicated system that their car or even the Apollo moon shots. It's
very hard to touch one piece in isolation. And folks will argue that
if design "right" this could all be avoided. To some degree they are
correct. But it will never be perfect, even when folks try
hard. Things are just too complicated for our minds or even our
management structures to control it all.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #332
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Sep 14 14:42:09 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id D25DA2246; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #333
Message-Id: <20060914184208.D25DA2246@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:43:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 333

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    A Cell Phone For 86,000 Dollars! (David Thomas, Dealerscope)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 14, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Report: Bell South Plans VDSL2 Upgrade (US Telecom Daily Lead) 
    Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (Gordon Burditt)
    Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: ACN (NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Henry)
    Re: Why no Name With Caller ID Number? (Sam Spade)
    Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Danny Burstein)
    Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage (Lisa Hancock)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:56:32 -0500
From: David Thomas <dealerscope@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: A Cell Phone For 86,000 Dollars!


5th Avenue Appeal: Nokia Sells $86,000 Phone (As Well as the Basic 
Clamshell) at new store in NY.

Take a quick stroll along Manhattan's most famous shopping blocks this 
weekend and you'll see: this ain't your Mama's 5th Avenue ... fashion's 
gone tech. CE Manufacturers are showcasing their most premium products 
in highly-designed new retail operations in the same block span as 
Tiffany's, Louis Vuitton, and Bergdorf Goodman. Last May, Apple opened a 
one-of-a-kind retail slash tourist site right at the Southeast corner of 
Central Park, across from the Plaza Hotel. Tomorrow, Nokia follows suit, 
opening it's fifth retail outlet in the world, the Nokia Store at 5th 
Ave and 57th Street, just a block away from both Apple and the Madison 
Avenue SonyStyle store.

The latest Nokia store (the company's second in the U.S., as a branch in 
Chicago opened last June) features some new ideas in retail design: 
glass walls that change colors, a second-floor lounge, and wall-to-wall 
screens with product information which appears only when a customer 
touches a product (vastly reducing the amount of signage in the store). 
Those screens are programmed to run futuristic but inviting images, from 
puppies and kittens to paper airplanes. "We didn't want this to feel 
like just a guy's store," says Cliff Crosbie, who's in charge of Nokia's 
global retail division. "From the wooden floor to the colors on the 
walls, this should feel warm and also constantly different every time 
people come in."

Crosbie says doing direct retail is a way for Nokia to make the public
aware of products that America's cellphone carriers have not picked up
en masse. The phone featured right at the front door is Nokia's 8801
(curently offered by T-Mobile), a shiny $649.00 model with what Nokia
calls "laser-cut curves." Also offered at the new store, is Nokia's
Vertu line, custom handsetsl ranging from $4000 to near $100,000 that
are made with nontraditional cellphone materials like diamonds, white
gold, and leather. Those top-of-the-line bar phones come with a
special "concierge button" on the side, just what a 5th Avenue shopper
could use to summon his/her driver at the end of a spree. 

-David Thomas

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 14, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:33:12 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 14, 2006
********************************

EarthLink to Expand VoIP Footprint
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19877?11228

     EarthLink has offered its VoIP solution in Dallas, Seattle, San
     Francisco, and San Jose since January EarthLink will now expand
     to cover Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City,
     Philadelphia, San Diego, and Washington D.C. EarthLink VoIP uses
     standard telephone connections in the home and last-mile copper
     cable to connect to ...

Vonage IPO Investors Told by Letter to Pay for Shares
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19871?11228

     WASHINGTON -- Vonage Holdings Corp. investors who have balked at
     paying for IPO shares they bought in the company, now worth less than
     half of the offering price, began receiving letters this week from
     brokerage firms telling them to write a check or risk legal action.
     The exact number of letters that were sent to deadbeat ...

Telecommunications Body Summons Telecom Italia to Assess Group Reorganization
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19869?11228

     ROME -- Italy's telecommunications watchdog said Thursday it has
     summoned the management of Telecom Italia SpA to discuss a
     recently approved plan that would separate the company's mobile
     telephone unit. The nation's largest telephone company approved
     the reorganization Monday to separate its fixed and mobile
     units ...

Verizon Wireless Enhances Search
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19866?11228

     Verizon Wireless' new Get It Now Search application is designed to
     make it easier for its customers to find downloadable content. The
     new offering allows customers to type in a search request or speak
     it, the carrier says.  The Get It Now Search service is available
     to Get It Now customers free of charge, according to Verizon, ...

Deutsche Telekom Given 90 Days To Open Its New Net
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19863?11228

     German regulators this morning told Deutsche Telekom (DT) it has
     90 days to open its spiffy new VDSL network to competitors.  DT
     has been embroiled in a running battle with the European
     Commission (EC), which pretty much forced the rules on the
     Germans. At stake is the continued buildout of DT's $3.8
     billion network, a project ...

Going Pro(-sumer)
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19860?11228

     Are consumers in the United States ready to embrace smartphones
     with rich feature sets including mobile email, video downloads,
     MP3 players, and digital cameras?  That's the big bet of
     device makers showing their new wares at CTIA Wireless IT and
     Entertainment this week. A raft of new devices, including the E62
     from Nokia Corp. ...

Tellabs Sneaks in a Cingular Win
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19858?11228

     Tellabs Inc. has notched up a contract win with Cingular Wireless
     LLC that the vendor hopes will presage a wave of business in
     wireless backhaul. Cingular is buying a combination of Tellabs
     5500 digital cross-connects and Tellabs 8800 routers, according
     to Tellabs officials. The win was not formally announced but did
     appear in ...

The Cellular Modem Market is Finally Taking Off
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19856?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- The cellular modem market has taken many
     years to develop, but by the end of this year it will reach a
     notable milestone, with annual shipments to exceed 5 million
     units, reports In-Stat. This market got a boost from embedded
     cellular modems in laptop computers, a class of modem only
     introduced toward the end of ...


TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:44:56 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Report: BellSouth Plans VDSL2 Upgrade


USTelecom dailyLead September 14, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eurofDtusXcesheXrK

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Report: BellSouth plans VDSL2 upgrade
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Intel, Siemens collaborate on VoIP
* Verizon gets more involved with video software
* Google's acquisition strategy
* News Corp.'s Chernin touts mobile platform
* Covad launches low-cost VoIP system for small businesses
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* New! The Irwin Handbook of Telecommunications, 5E
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Carriers band together to draw wireless broadband road map
* Opinion: The digital businessperson
* Opening up the audiovisual Web
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Maryland county, Verizon agree on TV pact
DIVERSIONS
* Philanthropy Google's Way: Not the Usual
* What to Do When Bumped From a Flight
* The Allure of Italy's Lakes
* The New Season
* 36 Hours: Chattanooga

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eurofDtusXcesheXrK

------------------------------

From: gordonb.y6w4o@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt)
Subject: Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:25:41 -0000
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


> What allows and causes a foreign unauthorized program to start
> execution on a computer where it doesn't belong?  

Users who will click on anything in email or on the web.  "This
program installs a virus.  Only an Idiot would deliberately install a
virus on his own computer.  Install Virus?"  A friend of mine set up a
piece of a web site that had prompts like that and little graphics of
a checking account balance counting down to zero.  Most visitors
clicked all the way through the multi-stage warning to install the
"virus", which never actually installed anything, just called them
idiots for trying.

Email programs which will run active content in emails in the "preview
pane" without a user being present.

Operating systems subject to remote code execution vulnerabilities
caused by, often, buffer overflow problems.

> In other words, who presses the start button on a supposedly
> personal computer to run sabotage?

Often, ignorant users, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Outlook,
and Microsoft Windows, not necessarily in that order.  Don't take this
to mean that non-Microsoft systems are invulnerable: they aren't.

I consider the fact that you can double-click on an attachment in an
email and cause it to execute to be as serious a problem as having a
self-destruct pedal between the gas and the brake of a car, even if
it's labelled "Press here to explode entire car".

> I don't understand how some external person can gain control of my
> computer, as if my neighbor could drive my automobile from his
> kitchen window.

If he installs a teenager with his head glued to a cell phone (who
will obey instructions from him) in your car, he *CAN* do that.  It
gets even worse when he can persuade YOUR kid or wife to do it for him
with YOUR cell phone minutes.  The same applies to higher-tech remote
controls.

There's a lot of remote-access stuff that is on by default and makes
life harder if you turn it off (see ports 137, 138, and 139).

>> were scanning the Internet for Windows systems that had the
>> MS06-040 vulnerability 

>> What allows a private computer to be scanned by external means (like
>> Spock using his scanners on a planet far below) so that its internal
>> software may be examined and manipulated?

If the vulnerability is in the network stack or in servers listening
on network ports, it's possible to probe corner cases by either
attempting the exploit or looking at a side effect of a fix (say, it
changes the way TCP sequence numbers are generated).  The probing is
done by treating the software as a "black box" but suspecting its
contents, for example, looking at the response to a particular type of
malformed packet.

Some scanners can operate as simply as connecting to port 25 of some
server, look at the banner line that comes back, and checking the
version of Sendmail against the known-vulnerable-version list.

>> and then using publicly available code

> Who wrote such code?

I wish they were residing in Club Fed.

> Lastly, why do such vulnerabilities exist in the first place?  I keep
> reading how the present Windows operating system is old; shouldn't all
> the necessary fixes be developed by now?

Software is complex and anticipating everything that can be thrown at
it is hard.  For example, suppose that at your house you have a phone
and an eight-year-old child who sometimes answers it when others are
busy.  Are you *ABSOLUTELY SURE* that nothing a stranger says to the
kid over the phone could cause your house to burn down?

> How much does it cost for companies to keep applying these patches
> every week?

Microsoft's Patch Tuesday is the second Tuesday of every month.
Some people don't like the Microsoft prioritization of patches:  a 
DRM patch that closed a hole allowing stripping protection came out
in 3 days.  Patches for the hole OPENED by MS06-042 and the silent
data corruption caused under certain conditions by MS06-049 didn't
get anywhere near that fast a fix.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole
Date: 14 Sep 2006 08:54:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


DLR wrote:

>> What is a "bot" program, as opposed to other kinds of computer
>> programs?

> It is a slang term for a program that runs in the background and take
> "orders" from somewhere else on the Internet. Short for robot. If you
> have one, someone else controls your computer. Typically they let you
> think you still have control and just use it to do their dirty work
> without (they hope) you knowing what's going on. Like someone taking
> your car each night from 1 am to 4 am to delivery drugs.

Thanks for your explanation.  It mades things clearer.  I hope you
won't mind a few more questions.

What is the "background" on your computer?  (In S/360-DOS days, we had
a background and foreground partitions.)  Why can't we, as the owner
of the PC, control what is and what is not run in the "background"?

I suspect the answer to my question is that PCs today are highly
automated which allows for much of this junk to happen in the first
place.  In its simplest state, a computer would require someone to
physically load and then execute each and every program desired.
Modern machines are automatic.  That is, if you're browsing a website
that sends you a .PDF file, your browser program automatically brings
up the Adobe program to read it.  I presume there's lot of other stuff
we lay people don't even know about going on, and the hackers take
advantage of that underworld.

I heard that M/S's new "Vista" will be _less_ automatic as a safety
measure.  I sure hope so.

>> What allows and causes a foreign unauthorized program to start
>> execution on a computer where it doesn't belong?

> Three main ways.

> 1. You are on the Internet without a router or with one but not behind
> a NAT setup which means you are exposed to the outside world.

Could you explain what "NAT" is and does?

> There are large number of computers probing EVERY address possible
> on the Internet to see if you respond.

Why is this allowed to even happen?  This is one of my big complaints
about the Intenet as it's presently set up:  It's designed to be so
"open" that anyone can do anything.  The computer dreamers and
idealists want it this way.  This was fine in a narrow world of the
very early days, but not fine in an anonymous world of today.  (Other
explanations would be appreciated).

> In a perfect world your computer would ignore these probes. But due
> to bugs in the various operating systems it is possible to find a
> bug that allows data sent in the probe to overwrite part of the OS
> and when that section of the OS is used the injected code takes
> over.

I don't understand why bugs would allow this to happen.  To "answer
the door" means (1) the computer program has to know when the doorbell
is rung and (2) then execute a routine to answer the doorbell, and (3)
respond to the doorbell request.  In other words, there is software
intentionally written and included to respond to outside probes.
Since probes are dangerous, why do we allow this?  Why don't we
disable the entire "door bell" process?

Again, I suspect the answer is this process makes for easy automation,
but maybe you or others could explain it better.

> sets things up to run at startup,

I know computers have a start up routine, I have changed mine for DOS
purposes.  But why should the start up routines be allowed to be
modified automatically?  Is it that hard to require the human to
modify the routine himself (or authorize said modification)?

> And does all of this in a way such that you don't notice it
> happening.

Maybe we need operating systems that make it impossible for the human
not to notice things are happening?  Or would that create a flurry of
warning messages?  (I must admit I turned off my browser's warnings
about confidential start and confidential stop of data.  This comes up
when I log on or enter an order on-line.)

> 2. You visit a web site or read an email that does basically the same
> as #1 but is based on bugs in your Internet browsing software. The web
> site (or AD on the web site) or email contains HTML code that exploits
> a bug and allows code to be inserted into your system.

That really bugs me.  As far as I know, Internet browsing software
should be READ ONLY with restrictions.  It should be extremely limited
in what it allows an external site to do on my machine.  I dislike the
idea of any site's -- even a 'trusted one' -- running their programs on my
machine.  How do I know their programs are not buggy even from a
"trusted" site?

> 3. Social engineering is where a pop up or email says click here and
> you WIN, GET, etc ... a million, prize, etc... and what you are
> clicking is a program (often disguised as a graphic) which install a
> BOT on your computer.

Why do browser writers create this kind of capability?

> If you surf you may be exposed. The only way to stop this is to
> disable java, activex, javascript, etc ... Which in todays web, makes
> for a very restricted experience.

This is very frustrating.  When I got my new machine at work I disabled
all that stuff.  Then I found I couldn't browse anywhere since everyone
required it.  Why, I don't know, it seemed sites were plenty able to
present information in an attractive way before those fancy features.
Further, my employer has me use sites that require fancy stuff.  At
least my browser warned me clearly when I turned that on of the risks.

>> Lastly, why do such vulnerabilities exist in the first place?  I keep
>> reading how the present Windows operating system is old; shouldn't all
>> the necessary fixes be developed by now?

> Modern OS's have 10s of millions of lines of code. People buy
> features.  They don't buy future security problems. All those systems
> designed with security as the first goal fell on the junk heap of
> computing past and continue to do so. Well except for some very
> special cases where market share and cost doesn't mater. But even the
> NSA finds it cheaper to build totally isolated rooms, and I mean
> totally, to run software on insecure systems than try and develop
> custom things that are secure from the ground up. And they will likely
> have holes also, just not as many. Maybe.

I'm still confused, but I think it's as you said -- people want features.

Computers do not _have_ to allow external entities to have control at
all.  The developers have chosen to include this for "service and
features" and failed to put in proper controls at the start, IMHO.  A
PC on a network, for instance, should not accept any networked
instructions or upgrades without a security key.  What's to stop some
well-intentioned but incompetent user from issuing his own upgrades
over the network and screwing everyone up?

I'll note in contrast that in IBM's System/360, critical functions by
the operating system had to be done in 'supervisor state' which was
strictly controlled by hardware.  You could submit and execute an
application program that does damage but you can't touch the operating
system.  Application programs are subject to various checks and
restrictions, including hardware blocks that was included in
System/360 from day one.

But the result is that the systems maintenance effort of a S/360 is
far more considerable than that required for a PC.  Presumably few
owners would want to bother doing all the work necessary.

> What people do not realize is that an off the shelf Windows or Mac
> system with MS Office, Email, web surfing, iTunes, etc... is a more
> complicated system that their car or even the Apollo moon shots. It's
> very hard to touch one piece in isolation. And folks will argue that
> if design "right" this could all be avoided. To some degree they are
> correct. But it will never be perfect, even when folks try
> hard. Things are just too complicated for our minds or even our
> management structures to control it all.

I agree that it's complex.  But I disagree it's insurmountable.

I am far from an expert.  But IMHO too much sophistication was rushed
into the marketplace too fast without adequate protection built in.
IMHO the "young turks" didn't know their history and should've.

IBM's first real operating system for S/360, known as "OS" turned out
to be a disaster.  It was extremely slow and a resource hog and
totally unsuited for low end machines as intended.  They couldn't
release it as is.  They developed some alternatives (DOS, BOS, BSP,
TOS), so people could at least use the new hardware and delayed
everything for about a year, almost secretly putting IBM into
bankruptcy (lots of costs, no revenues).  The point is that they chose
to wait.  They probably should've waited even longer than they did, I
think it took a while for the early production OS to be decent.
Modern developers should've learned from that experience: "The birth
of a baby takes nine months no matter how many women are involved" and
"adding people to a late project only makes it later", said the mgr of
OS.

In the very early days of computers the users were all programmers
presumably with good intentions and skills.  But by the 1960s it was
clear the user community would be large with a variety of skill
levels.  Computer designers put in safety checks so program bugs
(intentional or accidental) would only hurt the responsible user, not
everyone else.  Things like file restrictions, time limits, resource
limits, kept control on things.  Some controls were done by the human
operators who simply wouldn't allow certain jobs to run.  By the 1980s
these controls were sophisticated and automated.  A corporate
programmer couldn't go into the payroll system and give himself a
raise.

What I don't understand is why the PC world, especially when used in
networking and Internet service, failed to adopt the same controls the
mainframe world did.

Thanks again for your explanations!

[public replies please]

------------------------------

From: NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us
Subject: Re: ACN
Date: 14 Sep 2006 09:38:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


FreedomFireCom wrote:

> You're correct.  Their emphasis is on "recruiting" and most money
> earned comes from "recruiting bonuses".  They're also about $500 to
> start plus a bunch of other required recurring fees.

I had read elswhere about the $500.00 to join, but friend says it
would cost him nothing to join.

I did see on Ebay someone selling a bunch of ACN promo DVDs that are
given to potential recruits.

Friend brought one over.  No mention of product pricing, only
recruitment.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?
From: henry999@eircom.net (Henry)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:28:31 +0300
Organization: Saunalahti Customer


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: One other time that phones 'quit
> ringing' for a few hours was the Sunday night in July, 1969
> when the three astronauts landed on the moon. 

If I recall correctly, only two astronauts landed on the moon. The
third one had to remain aboard the spaceship that was orbiting the
moon while his two comrades went down to the surface.

Cheers,

Henry

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You are probably correct. And of course
there is now the theory which has been making the rounds for a while
which claims the entire thing took place either at  'area 51' or some
other back lot in Hollywood; that no one got even close to the Moon. PAT]

------------------------------

From: Sam Spade <Sam@coldmail.com>
Subject: Why no Name With Caller ID Number?
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:49:22 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


njem wrote:

> The phones I've had and those of some friends all just show a number
> for caller ID but not a name. On my home phone these same callers will
> show with name and number. Is it certain phones, or certain services,
> or the whole cell/mobile system that drops the name? And why? Caller
> ID loses most of its value when the name is dropped.

The FCC 1995 decision that mandated Caller ID required that only the 
number be sent.  The name service is an industry enhancement that is 
strictly optional.  There have been unending squabbles within the greedy 
little minions that run the telcos who should pay for what to have name 
delivery.

Don't ever expect universal delivery of names.

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:53:15 UTC
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


In <telecom25.332.7@telecom-digest.org> Anthony Bellanga
<anthonybellanga@gonestraighttohell.com> writes:

> Many RBOCs have been retro-fitting traditional "looking" payphones
> originally made by AT&T's Western Electric, and many independent LECs
> have been retro-fitting their traditional "looking" Automatic Electric
> payphones and Northern Telecom traditional Centurian payphones, with
> internal "smart-chips".

Part of the extended divestiture broohahahahaha was that the local
telcos had to provide the same "equal access" for coin operated
payphones to customer-owned equipment as they did to their own house
brands.

This was way, way, too messy on many levels.

At least in NY, and I suspect just about everywhere else, the local
telco simply ended that type of access years ago and replaced their
own phones (the internal guts, so to speak) with COCOT type "smart"
circuitry.

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Re: NYC Pennsylvania Station Pay Phone Usage
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:59:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Anthony Bellanga wrote:

> When was the last time you saw 1+ coin service from those Verizon coin
> phones in New York City?

Last week.  They offered both national and within NY State.
Admittedly, while the phones were Verizon, I didn't look at who the LD
carrier was.

Until about one year ago SEPTA pay phones also offered the same
national service, 25c a min/ 4 min minium.

> And those VZ payphones in NYCity -- what are you defining as Long
> Distance?

National service.

VZ also had phones in the train stations painted yellow offering
25c/min for within NY State only.  I presume NY State has multiple
LATAs in it.

> But for inter-LATA toll 1+ coin calls (outside of that limited NY/NJ
> corridor), AT&T won't handle those types of long distance calls
> anymore, at least not in the "traditional" 1+ coin way of doing
> things.

I don't know who handles this calls.

> If VZ payphones can still be used to place such calls, then
> it is being handled by some kind of internal COCOT-like "smart" chips,
> regardless of who the actual LD carrier happens to be.

Your suggestion is entirely possible, but actually involves more
expense and hardware than in the past.  Pay phones have been able to
handle long distance for many years.  Automated 1+ calling (to count
the coins) has been available for a long time.  You act as if this 1+
coin calling is something "new".

I hope to go up again and I'll see if I can find out who the carrier is.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #333
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Sep 14 23:02:27 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id B385821F3; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:02:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #334
Message-Id: <20060915030226.B385821F3@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:02:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 334

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Hacker Indicates Rise of Online Morocco (John Thorne  AP)
    Yahoo Mail Gets Makeover (Associated Press News Wire)
    Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole (DLR)
    Software and a Perfect Society (DLR)
    Re: NYC Pay Phones (Anthony Bellanga)
    Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity (annie)
    Re: ACN (Steven Lichter)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:07:00 -0500
From: John Thorne <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Hacker Indicates Rise of Online Morocco


By JOHN THORNE, Associated Press Writer


Morocco's most internationally famous criminal of late is not a
terrorist or serial killer, but a teenager with a knack for computers.

The conviction this week of a Moroccan science student for unleashing
the Zotob worm that ravaged U.S. computer networks last year could
even be cast as proof that this agriculture-dependent,
unemployment-plagued nation is making its mark on the digital world.

In August 2005, Zotob crashed computers across the United States,
including those of The Associated Press, The New York Times and other
media organizations; companies such as heavy-equipment maker
Caterpillar Inc.; and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
bureau.

Farid Essebar, then 18, was arrested soon afterward along with
accomplices in Morocco and Turkey in a sweep by U.S., Moroccan and
Turkish police. On Tuesday a court in Sale, near the capital, Rabat,
sentenced him to two years in prison and gave his friend Achraf
Bahloul one year.

While few Moroccans are willing to defend Essebar's flagrantly
criminal hacking feat, many see it as evidence that their country is
making the leap to computer literacy.

"There's a bit of pride that a local kid was good enough and had the
tools" to create Zotob, said Karl Stanzick, managing director of MTDS,
a Rabat-based high-speed Internet provider.

Moroccans' Internet use has exploded in the last two years, since
national telecommunications company Maroc Telecom went private and
opened telephone networks for DSL high-speed Internet. Now there are
an estimated 300,000 DSL connections in Morocco, Stanzick said.

Three years ago, a sluggish dial-up connection cost $500 a month,
Stanzick said, while today a broadband link roughly 30 times faster
costs just $50.

High-speed Internet has yet to reach much of Morocco's countryside,
where even telephones are still scarce. Morocco has just 2.35
computers for every 100 inhabitants compared to 76 in the United
States, according to the International Telecommunications Union.

But in urban centers like Rabat, the Internet is fast becoming a
lifestyle.

Cybercafes dot the city, from stylish air-conditioned joints offering
food and drinks to cramped dens tucked into the old medina, where even
the poorest can, for a few cents, bathe for hours in the eerie blue
glow of the screen. Schools offering courses in programming and
computer use have sprouted.

"When I first opened in 1998, 90 percent of my customers were
government workers who didn't even have the Internet in their
offices," recounted Khalid Limane, the owner of Globalnet, a cybercafe
in the upscale neighborhood of Agdal.

Now, his customers are mostly students from nearby schools dropping in
to check e-mail or use Globalnet's printer, scanner or fax machine.

"But even most of them have Internet at home, too," he added.

Behind him, teenagers and 20-somethings surfed on computers in
handsome wooden booths. A few others sipped cafe au lait and fruit
juice at tables in Globalnet's tiled yard.

One of them, 25-year-old telemarketing manager Mohamed Ben Moumen,
comes to hang out every day. The cheap, fast Internet connection
installed in his nearby office makes his job possible, he said.

"It's a means of keeping in touch with clients in France and with the
call centers here," explained Ben Moumen, whose company sells French
life insurance to French customers, one of a growing number of
Moroccan call centers French companies are turning to for marketing.

But with access to cyberspace comes the inevitable cybercrime, said
Ron O'Brien, a security analyst with antivirus manufacturer Sophos who
helped combat the Zotob worm.

Since cybercrime can be lucrative, it is especially tempting in poor
countries like Morocco, where online thieves targeting rich Westerners
are often protected from prosecution by national borders and
underdeveloped -- or nonexistent -- cybercrime laws. The international
police work that quickly bagged the Zotob hackers was unusual.

Zotob infected computers so they could be accessed remotely by an
unauthorized user. Hackers sometimes use such techniques to steal
credit card numbers or passwords.

"If you have the will and the means to gain access to a computer,"
O'Brien said, "you can obtain hacking kits on the Internet that will
tell you how to create a virus."

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:09:33 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Yahoo Mail Gets Makeover


Yahoo mail is getting a face-lift. The Web portal company says it's
made available a new beta version of its online e-mail service Yahoo
Mail.

Yahoo says the new iteration of its free e-mail service boasts more
desktop application-like features, such as drag-and-drop organization.
It also offers an integrated calendar and maps, message preview, an
integrated RSS reader and new search capabilities, among other
features.

The beta version works on Internet Explorer browsers on Windows
computers, and on Firefox browsers on both Windows and Mac computers.

When users sign in or create a new account, they will have the option
to try the new interface, and switch between old and new.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:43:49 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Re: Spammers Jump on Latest MS Hole


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> DLR wrote:

>>> What is a "bot" program, as opposed to other kinds of computer
>>> programs?

>> It is a slang term for a program that runs in the background and take
>> "orders" from somewhere else on the Internet. Short for robot. If you
>> have one, someone else controls your computer. Typically they let you
>> think you still have control and just use it to do their dirty work
>> without (they hope) you knowing what's going on. Like someone taking
>> your car each night from 1 am to 4 am to delivery drugs.

> Thanks for your explanation.  It mades things clearer.  I hope you
> won't mind a few more questions.

> What is the "background" on your computer?  (In S/360-DOS days, we had
> a background and foreground partitions.)  Why can't we, as the owner
> of the PC, control what is and what is not run in the "background"?

In the days you refer to everything but the console control program
was background. If you root around in some of the deeper recesses of
your Start / All Programs menu on Windows you'll find a program that
will show you (if you ask) everything going on at one time. There are
literallly at least a dozen or so at a minimum just to make things
work, allow you to print, surf, etc ... What the "really good" bots do
is insert themselves into one of the "standard" background processes
so it's not obvious that they are there. And there are other ways of
hiding.

> I suspect the answer to my question is that PCs today are highly
> automated which allows for much of this junk to happen in the first
> place.  In its simplest state, a computer would require someone to
> physically load and then execute each and every program desired.
> Modern machines are automatic.  That is, if you're browsing a website
> that sends you a .PDF file, your browser program automatically brings
> up the Adobe program to read it.  I presume there's lot of other stuff
> we lay people don't even know about going on, and the hackers take
> advantage of that underworld.

A LOT of other stuff. If you're reading email, the email program
doesn't really print. It asks another process to do that. If you send
email, it hands off the message to an email sending process which
hands it off to a TCP/IP process which hands it off in bits to a
driver which ...

> I heard that M/S's new "Vista" will be _less_ automatic as a safety
> measure.  I sure hope so.

Yes and no. The core problem with various versions of Windows is that 
they made a decision 20 years ago to make it easy for a program to 
access data from across the network and display it on your computer 
using code from another computer. This is a security flaw that they've 
been plugging ever since. But to turn it off would break vast amounts of 
things that consumers use day to day. They're stuck in a hole they dug 
and now aren't even allowed to fill.

>>> What allows and causes a foreign unauthorized program to start
>>> execution on a computer where it doesn't belong?
 
>> Three main ways.

>> 1. You are on the Internet without a router or with one but not behind
>> a NAT setup which means you are exposed to the outside world.

> Could you explain what "NAT" is and does?

In REAL SIMPLE terms it creates a private network on your side of the 
router. And if you turn off DMZ (don't ask, just do it) then unsolicited 
traffic from outside your private network are toss aside.

>> There are large number of computers probing EVERY address possible
>> on the Internet to see if you respond.

> Why is this allowed to even happen?  This is one of my big complaints
> about the Intenet as it's presently set up:  It's designed to be so
> "open" that anyone can do anything.  The computer dreamers and
> idealists want it this way.  This was fine in a narrow world of the
> very early days, but not fine in an anonymous world of today.  (Other
> explanations would be appreciated).

While I'm typing this I'm also working on two office networks across
town. I need to get in via unsolicited traffic. When you surf to a web
site, you're sending them unsolicited traffic. You're asking them to
send you back a web page. They didn't call you first to ask if it was
ok. What I call a probe is when another computer sends you an
unsolicited request, say a request for a web page. Depending on the
response from your computer if may decide you have a system running
with a software bug that can be exploited and it will then try to
exploit that code. Stopping all of this would be like asking the phone
company to beep out all curse words. It's like looking for needles in
needle stacks. What has been done and is being done more and more is
to stop allowing residential systems to offer up what are
traditionally called server services and block those. But that leads
to other problems. Think of the phone company not allowing residential
lines to conduct commerce.  Well what about yard sales or selling your
car?

>> In a perfect world your computer would ignore these probes. But due
>> to bugs in the various operating systems it is possible to find a
>> bug that allows data sent in the probe to overwrite part of the OS
>> and when that section of the OS is used the injected code takes
>> over.

> I don't understand why bugs would allow this to happen.  To "answer
> the door" means (1) the computer program has to know when the doorbell
> is rung and (2) then execute a routine to answer the doorbell, and (3)
> respond to the doorbell request.  In other words, there is software
> intentionally written and included to respond to outside probes.
> Since probes are dangerous, why do we allow this?  Why don't we
> disable the entire "door bell" process?

> Again, I suspect the answer is this process makes for easy
> automation, but maybe you or others could explain it better.

I go to your house. I ring your door bell. I wait a few minutes. If 
someone answers I ask for Mr. KLLDJSF and apologize for bothering you. 
If I get no answer and dogs don't start barking I try the door knob. If 
it's unlocked I wander around to the service utilities and unplug your 
phone line. Maybe your power. I then walk in the front door and pick up 
a few things then leave. If I want I replace your computer router with 
one of mine which has some interesting things hidden in it. Or maybe put 
a wireless tap on your phone line so I can listen or sell overseas calls 
on your line at 3 am.

The key point of all of this is that each and every house I "hack" takes 
time and money. To break into 1 computer and install a bot takes time 
and money. To try for 1,000,000 takes only a trivial bit more time and 
money.

>> sets things up to run at startup,

> I know computers have a start up routine, I have changed mine for DOS
> purposes.  But why should the start up routines be allowed to be
> modified automatically?  Is it that hard to require the human to
> modify the routine himself (or authorize said modification)?

It's very hard to design a perfect system. Especially one that does what 
you want and not what you don't want. DWIM buttons are very very very 
hard to implement.

And a lot of this comes from the early days of computing. In theory you 
can design a ring of protections. But early PCs didn't do this as it 
kills performance and memory requirements and so gets left out of early 
designs. And PCs which require a full time operator like a S360 don't 
sell very well.

>> And does all of this in a way such that you don't notice it
>> happening.

> Maybe we need operating systems that make it impossible for the human
> not to notice things are happening?  Or would that create a flurry of
> warning messages?  (I must admit I turned off my browser's warnings
> about confidential start and confidential stop of data.  This comes up
> when I log on or enter an order on-line.)

Bingo. People don't want to be bothered. TNSTAAFL They had to scale
back on the warning in Vista due to complaints.

>> 2. You visit a web site or read an email that does basically the same
>> as #1 but is based on bugs in your Internet browsing software. The web
>> site (or AD on the web site) or email contains HTML code that exploits
>> a bug and allows code to be inserted into your system.

> That really bugs me.  As far as I know, Internet browsing software
> should be READ ONLY with restrictions.  It should be extremely limited
> in what it allows an external site to do on my machine.  I dislike the
> idea of any site's -- even a 'trusted one' -- running their programs on my
> machine.  How do I know their programs are not buggy even from a
> "trusted" site?

Turn off all the extended things like Javascript and see how far you 
get. You can't do online ordering, banking, and none of those fancy 
dance bear displays will work. Dull loses to dancing bears in the 
marketplace every time.

Sound like you want a Lunix box. :)

>> 3. Social engineering is where a pop up or email says click here and
>> you WIN, GET, etc ... a million, prize, etc... and what you are
>> clicking is a program (often disguised as a graphic) which install a
>> BOT on your computer.

> Why do browser writers create this kind of capability?

So you can click on a link and get taken to a web site. You can turn 
this off but most folks like the results.

>> If you surf you may be exposed. The only way to stop this is to
>> disable java, activex, javascript, etc ... Which in todays web, makes
>> for a very restricted experience.

> This is very frustrating.  When I got my new machine at work I disabled
> all that stuff.  Then I found I couldn't browse anywhere since everyone
> required it.  Why, I don't know, it seemed sites were plenty able to
> present information in an attractive way before those fancy features.
> Further, my employer has me use sites that require fancy stuff.  At
> least my browser warned me clearly when I turned that on of the risks.

> The rest I'll continue in another reply.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:03:41 -0400
From: DLR <news23@raleighthings.com>
Subject: Software and a Perfect Society


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> DLR wrote:

>> If you surf you may be exposed. The only way to stop this is to
>> disable java, activex, javascript, etc ... Which in todays web, makes
>> for a very restricted experience.
> 
> This is very frustrating.  When I got my new machine at work I disabled
> all that stuff.  Then I found I couldn't browse anywhere since everyone
> required it.  Why, I don't know, it seemed sites were plenty able to
> present information in an attractive way before those fancy features.
> Further, my employer has me use sites that require fancy stuff.  At
> least my browser warned me clearly when I turned that on of the risks.

>>> Lastly, why do such vulnerabilities exist in the first place?  I keep
>>> reading how the present Windows operating system is old; shouldn't all
>>> the necessary fixes be developed by now?

>> Modern OS's have 10s of millions of lines of code. People buy
>> features.  They don't buy future security problems. All those systems
>> designed with security as the first goal fell on the junk heap of
>> computing past and continue to do so. Well except for some very
>> special cases where market share and cost doesn't mater. But even the
>> NSA finds it cheaper to build totally isolated rooms, and I mean
>> totally, to run software on insecure systems than try and develop
>> custom things that are secure from the ground up. And they will likely
>> have holes also, just not as many. Maybe.

> I'm still confused, but I think it's as you said -- people want features.

> Computers do not _have_ to allow external entities to have control at
> all.  The developers have chosen to include this for "service and
> features" and failed to put in proper controls at the start, IMHO.  A
> PC on a network, for instance, should not accept any networked
> instructions or upgrades without a security key.  What's to stop some
> well-intentioned but incompetent user from issuing his own upgrades
> over the network and screwing everyone up?

>> I'll note in contrast that in IBM's System/360, critical functions by
>> the operating system had to be done in 'supervisor state' which was
>> strictly controlled by hardware.  You could submit and execute an
>> application program that does damage but you can't touch the operating
>> system.  Application programs are subject to various checks and
>> all.  The developers have chosen to include this for "service and
>> restrictions, including hardware blocks that was included in
>> System/360 from day one.

> But the result is that the systems maintenance effort of a S/360 is
> far more considerable than that required for a PC.  Presumably few
> owners would want to bother doing all the work necessary.

>> What people do not realize is that an off the shelf Windows or Mac
>> system with MS Office, Email, web surfing, iTunes, etc... is a more
>> complicated system that their car or even the Apollo moon shots. It's
>> very hard to touch one piece in isolation. And folks will argue that
>> if design "right" this could all be avoided. To some degree they are
>> correct. But it will never be perfect, even when folks try
>> hard. Things are just too complicated for our minds or even our
>> management structures to control it all.

>> I agree that it's complex.  But I disagree it's insurmountable.

>> I am far from an expert.  But IMHO too much sophistication was rushed
>> into the marketplace too fast without adequate protection built in.
>> IMHO the "young turks" didn't know their history and should've.

> IBM's first real operating system for S/360, known as "OS" turned out
> to be a disaster.  It was extremely slow and a resource hog and
> totally unsuited for low end machines as intended.  They couldn't
> release it as is.  They developed some alternatives (DOS, BOS, BSP,
> TOS), so people could at least use the new hardware and delayed
> everything for about a year, almost secretly putting IBM into
> bankruptcy (lots of costs, no revenues).  The point is that they chose
> to wait.  They probably should've waited even longer than they did, I
> think it took a while for the early production OS to be decent.
> Modern developers should've learned from that experience: "The birth
> of a baby takes nine months no matter how many women are involved" and
> "adding people to a late project only makes it later", said the mgr of
> OS.

If you read the history you'll find out that the biggest issue was
that OS/360 was designed around systems with lots of memory. When
marketing & R&D decided they could not sell systems with that much
memory due to costs a huge effort had to go into ways of running a
system initially design for XX amount of memory with only XX/4 or less
memory. That issue, in a myriad of ways haunted S/360 for the next 20
to 30 years.

> In the very early days of computers the users were all programmers
> presumably with good intentions and skills.  But by the 1960s it was
> clear the user community would be large with a variety of skill
> levels.  Computer designers put in safety checks so program bugs
> (intentional or accidental) would only hurt the responsible user, not
> everyone else.  Things like file restrictions, time limits, resource
> limits, kept control on things.  Some controls were done by the human
> operators who simply wouldn't allow certain jobs to run.  By the 1980s
> these controls were sophisticated and automated.  A corporate
> programmer couldn't go into the payroll system and give himself a
> raise.

> What I don't understand is why the PC world, especially when used in
> networking and Internet service, failed to adopt the same controls the
> mainframe world did.

> Thanks again for your explanations!

People aren't perfect. The systems they design will never be perfect. Oh 
there are a few wizards who can do really good things, but a wizard 
can't program Windows Vista, Mac OS X, Linux, or whatever. It would just 
never get done. Then add on the programs like Quickbooks, Office, CAD 
software, etc ... and not even 10 or 50 people can do it. And as MS 
proved to the entire world, features and perceived benefits will outsell 
safe and dull every day of the week, Sundays included.

People want safety and security but they buy price and features.

Going back to my wife, she works for a major airline. Folks complain
non-stop about security but look what everyone says when it
fails. Then everyone, especially the ones who complained about the
searches, wants to know how "they" got through.

Look at what Y2K cost in terms of programming. All because programmers
and managers save money by ignoring the approaching century until it
hit them over the head. And then they tried to ignore it.

Yes you can engineer things so that most bad things will not happen,
but first you have to get people to buy your product. And you'll
usually lose to someone with a slipshod implementation that demos and
runs good out of the box. This kind of engineering needs rules and
laws. But when the industry changes faster than the election cycle,
these are hard to come by. Don't even get me started about CAN-SPAM
and how it increased SPAM.

And yes I have some history here. My first program was enter via front
panel switches on an IBM mini-computer in 1972. I wasn't there in the
beginning but I've been there for 80% of the relevant history. As a
programmer of systems, business applications, and now in systems
admin.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:03:13 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@addesswithheld.biz
Reply-To: no-spam@no-spam.no-spam
Subject: Re: NYC Pay Phones


********************************************************************
PAT - DO NOT display my email address anywhere in this post! Thanks.

THANKS!
********************************************************************

Lisa Hancock <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Anthony Bellanga wrote:

>> If VZ payphones can still be used to place such calls, then
>> it is being handled by some kind of internal COCOT-like "smart"
>> chips, regardless of who the actual LD carrier happens to be.

> Your suggestion is entirely possible, but actually involves more
> expense and hardware than in the past.  Pay phones have been able
> to handle long distance for many years.  Automated 1+ calling (to
> count the coins) has been available for a long time.  You act as
> if this 1+ coin calling is something "new".

Toll coin calls never had their coins counted in the central office.
The operator handled them for a long time, until AT&T and the locals
began to implement ACTS, Automated Coin Toll Service, for customer
dialed 1+ coin calls, within the operator service switch, i.e., the
TSPS (Traffic Service Position System), or TOPS (Traffic Operator
Position Service), or OSPS (Operator Service Position System).

AT&T seems to have been the ONLY inter-LATA coin toll carrier in the
US, with the few exceptions of "nearby" or "corridor" inter-LATA coin
toll calls, such as NYC with northeastern NJ, southwestern NJ with
southeastern PA, and some other short-haul inter-LATA arrangements
which had received special waivers from the DOJ and FCC, those
corridor type inter-LATA 1+ coin calls could probably also be handled
by the local telco or AT&T, depending on whether or not you dialed the
right 101XXXX prefix first.

But AT&T Long Distance discontinued ALL 1+ and 011+ coin toll service
back in 2002/03. They reconfigured the trunk groups from the local
central offices with their twenty or so regional OSPS switches that
handle Operator and Card services, so that traditional AT&T handled
1+ coin toll service was discontinued. The FCC apparantly approved
AT&T's withdrawal from this back in 2001. AT&T's withdrawal from
traditional 1+ coin also eliminated their traditional provision of
coin "person" service dialed as 0+, and 01+ for international coin
person calling.

Where traditional central office controlled coin phones are still in
use by the ILECs, local coin calls are still handled by the local
central office, and 1+ intra-LATA coin toll, as well as any possible
grandfathered corridor inter-LATA 1+ coin calls, are handled by the
ILEC's TOPS switches. Intra-LATA coin person calls would also still be
possible as 0+ via the ILEC's TOPS.

But private "COCOT" payphones with internal "smart" chips began to
appear during the 1980s and have taken over. Several of us (myself,
Joseph Singer, Danny Burstein) have already stated that even most of
the ILECs have been reconfiguring their payphones so that the central
office and the Operator TOPS no longer handle local or 1+ intra-LATA
coin calls, but rather new internal "smart chips" will handle this in
the same manner that a private "COCOT" payphone does.

If an ILEC wants to provide "universal" 1+ coin service, both local,
intra-LATA, inter-LATA, and even possibly international, at least for
inter-LATA, they have to do it via "smart chips". It really doesn't
matter who the LD carrier is, since all the LD carrier is doing is
handling a "standard 1+ call" on behalf of the ILEC's line.  The
"smart chips" in the phone will quote/count/collect/etc. the coins,
regardless of who the LD carrier might happen to be.

That same ILEC might have "hybrid" phones, where intra-LATA 1+ coin
toll is still handled in the "traditional" sense, routing to their
TOPS for 1+ coin treatment; and basic local coin calls are handled
in the local central office.

OR the ILEC might have chosen to COMPLETELY "COCOT-ize" their
payphones for ALL coin calls, local, zoned, 1+ intra-LATA, 1+
inter-LATA, etc., maybe even 011+ international.

OR ... the ILEC could completely WITHDRAW from owning and providing
payphone service altogather, as many rural and small town local telcos
have been doing since the mid-1990s, and even BellSouth completely
withdrew from payphone service by 2003/04. BellSouth began to totally
"COCOT-ize" their payphones starting in the mid-1990s. When the ILEC
no longer provides payphone services, then ALL payphones are truly
COCOTs, in that ALL of them are PRIVATELY owned. But even when those
ILECs were providing payphones in the last several years, it was no
different in overall operation than the truly privately owned
payphones since all of them had internal "smart chips".

Like it or not, the private "COCOT" payphone has taken over, either as
a truly privately owned payphone, or else as an ILEC (telco) owned
payphone but with COCOT-like "smart chips" inside of the phone,
without ANY telephone network switching element having control over
the coi, quoting/counting/collecting/returning/etc. Whatsoever.
anymore.

> I hope to go up again and I'll see if I can find out who the carrier
> is.

I doubt that you will be able to determine who the carrier is for 1+
coin. Since the phone isn't your own, you are free to use it at the
rates posted or quoted, if depositing coins, or else use your calling
card or other method of payment (collect, third party, etc), ideally
by dialing a toll-free 800/888/877/866 number to access the operator
or card provider of your choice. Don't ever dial 0- or 0+ from a
payphone and expect to get AT&T or the ILEC operator or service
anymore, even if the payphone is AT&T or ILEC branded, or displays such
as the '0' carrier on the instruction card. If making a calling card
type call from a payphone, use the toll-free 800 type number displayed
on your card.

And if you think that you might find who the inter-LATA 1+ carrier is
by dialing 1-700-555-4141, most payhones do NOT allow that to be
dialed. The internal "smart chips" don't have the 700 area code
programmed in as a valid area code.

Things have been changing since 1984 and even before then too. I'm not
happy with the direction of some things in telecom, especially with
payphones. But I almost exclusively use my cellphone, rarely even
using my residential landline phone anymore, even though I still
subscribe to a traditional residential landline phone.

------------------------------

From: annie <dmr436@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Exploitative Internet Marketing Fuels Child Obesity
Date: 14 Sep 2006 12:07:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


> I was born in 1928 and so I grew up in the depression years of
> the 1930s and then the 1940s.

Well, I was born in 1953 (getting so I don't want to admit it, but
 ...)  and grew up in the 50s and 60s and ...

> Cooking then was commonly done with lard or solid other animal fats.

When I learned to cook it was very common to use meat products for
shortening and for seasoning. Still is, actually. :) Hey, leftover
sausages or bacon can make very tasty green beans! :) Bacon drippings
gives eggs that "down home" flavor.

People like that kind of cooking. Why? It tastes good! :)

> Hamburger places existed, fried their hamburgers and french fries in
> lard, and the hamburgers were generally bigger and greasier than you
> get today in most places frequented by children.

When I think back to my teen years, places like McDonalds, White
Castle, and Wetsons were common. They really didn't have the Big Mac
or the Whopper back then, just regular burgers, which were not really
that large, but nobody ate just one. :)

> Why were't we visited with an epidemic of obesity.

I don't know. My family is lucky I guess. I'm a few pounds over what I
weighed in my teens, but I'm certainly not obese.

When I think back, we were toally bombarded with ads for sugar cereal,
candy bars, soda (no diet yet except for Diet Rite which was NASTY)
and of course we kids just downed humongous portions of Sugar Frosted
Flakes, long before those "part of this nutritious breakfast" days.
Amazing we didn't all die from sucrose poisioning! :)

Of course the school lunch back then was based on the Basic 4, having
been demoted from the Basic 7 a while back. Main dish was always meat,
hot dogs, hamburgers (well, they had some meat in them, I guess), meat
loaf, deepfried fish, and nobody developed a heart condition in the
7th grade back then. :)

> But fast food places sell much tastier food.  And, at 78, I still find
> them much better tasting than all the so-called health foods, low-fat
> foods, and trendy products.

Fast food outlets will sell what sells. Economics 101.

> I'm not sure, however, what this has to do with communications, except
> that it more or less shows that at least some advertising is not as
> effective as the advertisers would like.

I really think that the advertisers are being blamed when it's not
(totally) their fault. I also think parents are being blamed when it's
not (totally) their fault either.

Is childhood obesity really as rampant as "they" say? As I look at
kids playing in the neighborhoods, yes, there are some chunky ones,
but no more than when I was young. (I guess, though, that the real
Mouse Potatoes will not be the ones you see playing in the street,
huh?)

It's my impression that the current generation is by far healthier
than past generations. We can now prevent and treat countless
conditions that once plagued us. Obesity can be treated more
effectively than back in the 50's, like other conditions. (Diet,
exercise, are still quite effective.)

I almost cringe at thinking back at the cigarette ads that bombarded
us all, adults and kids alike, during the evening TV hours! (Not to
mention magazines!) If there's any product that WILL hurt you when
used as directed, this is it! These ads have been off the air for 30
years are so, and guess what, they now say that smoking is again on
the rise among teenagers.

Oh well ...

------------------------------

From: Steven Lichter <diespammers@ikillspammers.com>
Organization: I Kill Spammers, Inc.
Subject: Re: ACN
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:07:16 GMT


NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us wrote:

> FreedomFireCom wrote:

>> You're correct.  Their emphasis is on "recruiting" and most money
>> earned comes from "recruiting bonuses".  They're also about $500 to
>> start plus a bunch of other required recurring fees.

> I had read elswhere about the $500.00 to join, but friend says it
> would cost him nothing to join.

> I did see on Ebay someone selling a bunch of ACN promo DVDs that are
> given to potential recruits.

> Friend brought one over.  No mention of product pricing, only
> recruitment.

That will not last very long, the one offering gas savings with a pill 
go busted.

The Only Good Spammer is a Dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? 
(c) 2006  I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot In Hell Co.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #334
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Fri Sep 15 20:37:12 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 4999921D3; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #335
Message-Id: <20060916003712.4999921D3@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:38:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 335

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Cyber Crime Getting a Lot More Organized (Matthew Jones)
    Zotob Virus Writers Go to Prison (BBC News Wire)
    On the Internet, A Sea of Suckers and Fools (Michelle Singletary)
    BT to Introduce Fixed-Mobile Service For Businesses (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 15, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Telecom Update #546, September 15, 2006 John Riddel)
    Dish Network Unsolicited Calls (Jim Haynes)
    Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years (Mr Joseph Singer)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:30:35 -0500
From: Matthew Jones <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Cyber Crime Getting a Lot More Organized


by Matthew Jones

Cyber scams are increasingly being committed by organized crime
syndicates out to profit from sophisticated ruses rather than hackers
keen to make an online name for themselves, according to a top U.S.
official. But hackers often times 'graduate' to become criminals.

Christopher Painter, deputy chief of the computer crimes and
intellectual property section at the Department of Justice, said there
had been a distinct shift in recent years in the type of cyber
criminals that online detectives now encounter.

"There has been a change in the people who attack computer networks,
away from the 'bragging hacker' toward those driven by monetary
motives," Painter told Reuters in an interview this week.

Although media reports often focus on stories about teenage hackers
tracked down in their bedroom, the greater danger lies in the more
anonymous virtual interlopers.

"There are still instances of these 'lone-gunman' hackers but more and
more we are seeing organized criminal groups, groups that are often
organized online targeting victims via the Internet," said Painter, in
London for a cyber crime conference.

Typically these groups engage in ID theft, carding (the illegal use of
bank cards) and so-called Botnet armies where hundreds sometimes
thousands of computers are taken over and used to infect other
machines.

HARD TO TRACE

Precise figures on the global cost of online crimes are hard to pin
down, in part because some organizations prefer to keep quiet rather
than publicize that their networks have been successfully attacked.

In other cases companies and individuals are unaware they have been
defrauded.

The FBI estimates all types of computer crime in the U.S. costs
industry about $400 billion while in Britain the Department of Trade
and Industry said computer crime had risen by 50 percent over the last
two years.

"Because crimes are committed online a lot of people still don't
understand what is happening," said Painter.

A growing worry is that cyber crooks could target emergency services
for extortion purposes or that terrorists may be tempted to attack
critical utility networks like water and electricity.

Painter said there was a recent case in the U.S. where two young
hackers inadvertently switched off all the lights at the local
airport.

"There is no question the threats are varied and the perpetrators are
more sophisticated," he said. "On the upside the response is also
getting better."

Transborder co-operation on Internet crime was improving with a number
of large multi-country raids demonstrating national enforcement
agencies can work well together.

Painter said better detection and more successful prosecutions also
needed to be mirrored by appropriate sentencing.

"In the United States certainly sentencing has become more significant
in the recognition of the seriousness of Internet crime."

He said hackers were being viewed less as "playful villains" while
organized cyber criminals were being hunted with the same vigor as
physical crooks.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news of interest, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:33:34 -0500
From: BBC News Wire <bbc@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Zotob Worm Writers Sent to Prison


The creators of the Zotob Windows worm have been given prison
sentences by a Moroccan court.  The two men behind the malicious
program, Farid Essabar and Achraf Bahloul, were caught soon after the
virus struck in August 2005.

The pair faced charges of conspiracy, theft, using forged credit cards
and illegal access to computers.

Zotob caught out high-profile firms such as CNN, the Financial Times
and the New York Times.

The worm targeted Microsoft's Windows 2000 operating system which is
widely used by many large companies.

About 100 companies, including heavy plant maker Caterpillar,
reportedly suffered computer problems as a result of the Zotob worm.

At news firm CNN the worm disrupted the station's live reports.
Computers infected by the worm fell into a cycle of constant
re-starts.

The authorities caught up with the pair less than a fortnight after
the virus struck and many anti-virus experts were surprised that they
were based in Morocco. Mr Essabar now faces up to twenty years in
prison and Mr Bahloul up to ten years.

Mr Essabar is also thought to be behind a series of other viruses that
targeted Windows computers.

The pair were thought to have worked closely with an accomplice in
Turkey named by the FBI as Atilla Ekici.

Lawyers for the two men said they planned to file an appeal against
their sentences.


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/5345404.stm

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines of interest, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/BBC.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:38:01 -0500
From: Michelle Singletary <washpost@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: On the Internet, A Sea of Suckers and Fools


By Michelle Singletary

P.T. Barnum is often quoted as having said, "There's a sucker born
every minute."

Turns out there's no evidence that Barnum ever made such a
declaration.  Interesting, isn't it, that one of the most famous
quotes about the gullibility of people is falsely attributed to
Barnum?

Still, the quote holds true. In this Internet era, there really are as
many suckers as there are megabytes.

Take for example, a very annoying e-mail making the rounds. The
subject line says, "PLEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING
AMERICA TODAY SHOW."

The "it" the e-mail is referring to is a story that Microsoft and AOL
are running a tracking test and if you forward the e-mail, you could
get $245 for every person you send it to. The e-mail goes on to claim,
"For every person that you sent it to that forwards it on, Microsoft
will pay you $243 and for every third person that receives it, you
will be paid $241. Within two weeks, Microsoft will contact you for
your address and then send you a check."

Oh, and to make it all seem so legit, the writer (you can't really
tell who it is) claims he or she got a check for $24,800 two weeks
after receiving the e-mail. Then the person urges, "Please forward
this to as many people as possible. You are bound to get at least
$10,000. We're not going to help them out with their e-mail beta test
without getting a little something for our time. My brother's
girlfriend got in on this a few months ago. She showed me her
check. It was for the sum of $4,324.44."

Don't you just love that touch of 44 cents?

I've gotten at least half a dozen of these e-mails.

You would think I wouldn't have to say this, but here goes: You are a
sucker if you believe this is true.

What is wrong with you people? Stop forwarding this darn e-mail. It's
a hoax, according to a spokesman for Microsoft.

Fortunately, the e-mail doesn't contain a virus, so it's not too
harmful. But what about others that are forwarded that result in undue
worry? Most recently, I received an e-mail with a dire warning.

It claimed that the plastic credit-card-looking room keys that hotels
often use contain personal information, such as your credit card
number and expiration date and home address. Don't just turn the cards
in at the end of your stay, the e-mail warns. Anybody, especially an
unscrupulous hotel employee, can take the card and -- using a scanning
device -- access your information.

I was alarmed. After all, identity theft is on the rise. Recent
surveys estimate that nearly 10 million consumers are victimized by
some form of identity theft each year, according to the Federal Trade
Commission.  Identity theft occurs when your personal information is
stolen and used without your knowledge to make purchases or commit
crimes. It can cost you a lot of time and money to clear your name if
you are a victim of identity theft.

I was worried that out there in some trash can was a plastic hotel key
I had discarded with my personal information.

Turns out this, too, is not true.

These cards do not supply guests' personal information such as credit
card number, home address or e-mail address, according to the American
Hotel & Lodging Association, which put out a statement to try to
dispel this myth.

"On most hotel key cards, there is an encoder system with numbers
only," explained Victor Glover, senior vice president of safety and
security for Accor North America and chair of the association's Loss
Prevention Committee.

Glover further explained, "The number represents the date and time a
guest checks in and out. Once that date and time have passed, the key
is no longer active. The magnetic strip on the back of the card
carries the encoder numbers that will correspond to the strips in the
door itself.  The activation of the key card is solely based on how
long a guest is staying, not credit card, Social Security and other
personal information."

Okay, so I was a sucker. But this particular e-mail sounded so
plausible.

If you are curious about a suspicious e-mail, there is nothing wrong
with checking it out. Try this Web site: http://www.snopes.com/ . In
fact, the Microsoft/AOL money giveaway is No. 2 on the site's "25
Hottest Urban Legends" list.

What you should never do is forward these e-mails. And if you do,
don't think it's a harmless action.

Here's the note I got along with the e-mail promoting the bogus 
Microsoft giveaway -- "Sorry about the mail of this sort, but maybe we 
can benefit from this ... who knows? Try it yourself, what can you lose?"

Folks, in the end somebody could lose. Forwarding these e-mails could 
result in many of your friends, co-workers or family members ending up 
on spam e-mail lists. That, in turn, could increase the amount of junk 
mail they get. And that might lead to somebody becoming a sucker who 
loses some real money.

Researcher Tara S. Prasad contributed to this column.

 -- On the air: Michelle Singletary discusses personal finance Tuesdays on 
NPR's "Day to Day" program and online athttp://www.npr.org.

 -- By mail: Readers can write to her at The Washington Post, 1150 15th 
St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071.

 -- By e-mail:singletarym@washpost.com.

Copyright 2006 The Washington Post Company

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:33:03 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: BT to Introduce Fixed-Mobile Service for Large Businesses


USTelecom dailyLead
September 15, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/evawfDtusXchfPiFsE

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* BT to introduce fixed-mobile service for large businesses
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Comcast channels to appear on AT&T's U-verse
* Murdoch may swap DirecTV stake for Liberty's News Corp. stake
* Nortel considering Force10 acquisition
* Vodafone inks another fixed-line broadband deal
* CBS, Comcast downloads to be ad-driven, not fee-based
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Microsoft releases Zune details
* Today's TV-Net experiment could set tomorrow's standard
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* Skype software allows PC-Mac video link
* Companies form IP quality alliance
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC spectrum auction nears end; T-Mobile leads bidding
* Schwarzenegger to sign mobile phone bill
DIVERSIONS
* Near a Lake, and Away From It All
* Music Player From Microsoft Offers Wireless Song-Sharing
* Getting a Kick Out of Kickball
* 36 Hours: Chicago
* Sunshine, Salt and Speed: The Fastest Show on Earth

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 15, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:23:26 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 15, 2006
********************************

FCC Sets Schedule for Unlicensed Use of TV Spectrum
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19906?11228

     Having sought comments on methods to identify available unused TV
     spectrum in specific locations, the Federal Communications
     Commission (FCC) has announced a timetable for developing
     equipment that will utilise unused TV spectrum, particularly as
     spectrum will be freed up by the move to digital TV ...

Ericsson to Add 500 Engineers as Part of Company Restructure
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19896?11228

     STOCKOLM, Sweden -- Swedish telecom giant LM Ericsson said Friday
     it will recruit 500 new engineers as part of a restructuring the
     company said will lead to a more customer-oriented organization.
     The wireless-equipment maker said it will divide the company into
     three distinct business units, geared toward specific market ...

BT to Launch Converged Fixed-Mobile Service for Corporates
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19894?11228

     LONDON -- BT this week announced BT Corporate Fusion, a
     groundbreaking premise based fixed-mobile convergence service for
     large organizations. The new service will enable organizations to
     take advantage of fixed-mobile convergence and their increasing
     deployment of IP Telephony and WiFi coverage to potentially
     deliver ...

Wireless Players Launch Next-Gen Initiative
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19891?11228

     Wireless operators from around the globe are joining forces in
     the name of next-generation wireless advancement. A group of
     seven operators, including Sprint Nextel, NTT DoCoMo, China
     Mobile, T-Mobile, Vodafone, Orange and KPN, have launched the
     Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) initiative to move
     wireless beyond 3G.  The NGMN ...

A One Phone World?
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19886?11228

     The CTIA - The Wireless Association and the Wi-Fi Alliance are
     teaming to test dualmode cellular/WiFi devices in a move that
     could eventually lead to &quot;one phone in your life,&quot;
     according to the Alliance. The industry bodies will work with
     three labs that are certified to run both CTIA and WiFi
     tests. They plan to test ...

Telcos Edge Cable in Q2 Broadband Battle
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19883?11228

     Gathering more momentum in the ongoing broadband wars, U.S. phone
     companies netted slightly more high-speed data subscribers in the
     second quarter than did their cable rivals, according to the
     latest research compiled by Cable Digital News. For at least the
     seventh time in the past nine quarters, the telcos outgunned the
     cable guys ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #546, September 15, 2006
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:53:33 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca

Number 546: September 15, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:

** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page
** BIG PIPE: www.bigpipeinc.com
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

************************************************************

IN THIS ISSUE:

** Telus to Become Income Trust
** Stock Market Voodoo=20
** 2006 Telecom Hall of Fame Awards Announced
** Wireless-Only Households Jump to 615,000
** Telus to Run Ontario Government Network
** Bell Opens Montreal Testing Lab
** Rogers Provides Corporate Email Encryption
** Nokia, Nortel Chosen for Telus Broadband Project
** SaskTel to Launch Winnipeg Directory
** Rates for Toll-Free Carrier ID to Be Amended
** U.S. Wireless Auction to Reap $13.7 Billion
** MTS Buys Rural Manitoba Cableco
** Boisvert Steps Down as Telesat CEO
** Top Educators to Address "Enterprise Networks"

TELUS TO BECOME INCOME TRUST: If all goes as planned, Telus
Corporation will become Canada's largest income trust following a
special shareholders' meeting in January 2007. The carrier recently
exhausted the tax shield it acquired by buying Clearnet in 2000:
converting to an income trust will substantially reduce its future tax
liabilities. Telus shares jumped 13.5% following the announcement.

STOCK MARKET VOODOO: Earlier this year investors yawned when BCE
converted a big part of its assets into an income trust, and the BCE's
stock price barely budged. But Telus's announcement this week caused
BCE's stock to jump 8.5%. Does anyone really believe that the stock
market is rational?

2006 TELECOM HALL OF FAME AWARDS ANNOUNCED:  The six telecom pioneer
and industry leaders who will be officially inducted into Canada's
Telecom Hall of Fame at a gala dinner in Toronto on October 16 were
announced this week. The 2006 laureates will be:

** Inventors and Innovators: Edward Rogers Sr (batteryless
   radio) and Donald Hings (walkie-talkie)

** Icons of Business: Ted Rogers (Rogers Communications) and
   Leila Wightman (Wightman Telephones in rural Ontario)

** Servants of the Public: Ernie Saunders (senior regulatory
   lawyer at Bell Canada)

** Advocates and Academics: Francis Dagger (champion of
   public interest in telecom, driver behind government
   ownership of western telcos)

** Special Recognition Award: "Digital World" (the SL-1/DMS
   digital switching technology developed by Bell-Northern
   Research and Northern Telecom in the 1970s)

http://www.telecomhall.ca/awards/2006/index.php

WIRELESS-ONLY HOUSEHOLDS JUMP TO 615,000: Statistics Canada reports
that 615,000 Canadian households were using only cellphone service at
the end of 2005, a jump of 285,000 from the previous year. Incumbent
telcos' wireline revenues dropped by 3.8% in the year ending March 31,
2006, while wireless revenues shot up by 17.2%.

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/060913/d060913c.htm

TELUS TO RUN ONTARIO GOVERNMENT NETWORK: The Government of Ontario has
awarded Telus a five-year $140 million contract to supply and manage
the data network that links 1,500 government locations across the
province.  The previous provider was EDS Canada, utilizing network
services from Bell Canada and Telus.

BELL OPENS MONTREAL TESTING LAB: A new Bell Canada laboratory in
Montreal includes $100 million in technology and 125 km of fibre optics.
It will test new products developed by Bell and other suppliers.

ROGERS PROVIDES CORPORATE EMAIL ENCRYPTION: Rogers Business Solutions
has launched "Canada's first subscription-based encryption email
service" for business users. The IBM-hosted service is $8.95 per email
address per month.

NOKIA, NORTEL CHOSEN FOR TELUS BROADBAND PROJECT: Nokia and Nortel
Networks will be major suppliers for Telus's $600 million broadband
networking project. Nokia has a $150 million contract as integrator
and installer of the telco's IP access network; Nortel will provide
multimedia integration services. (See Telecom Update #545)

SASKTEL TO LAUNCH WINNIPEG DIRECTORY: DirectWest, SaskTel's phone book
publishing subsidiary, says it will spend $3 million to launch a
competitive directory in Winnipeg. DirectWest already publishes 
competitive directories in five Alberta cities, including Edmonton and
Calgary.

RATES FOR TOLL-FREE CARRIER ID TO BE AMENDED: CRTC Telecom Decision
2006-57 notes that the costs of the incumbent telcos' 800/888 Carrier
Identification services, charged to competing carriers, have not been
reviewed since 2001. The Commission says "costs for this database
service have likely declined significantly" and directs Bell Aliant,
Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel, and Telus to file amended tariff
pages and cost studies within 45 days.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-57.htm

U.S. WIRELESS AUCTION TO REAP $13.7 BILLION: There were only two bids
in the latest round of the U.S. auction of broadband wireless
spectrum, indicating that the process is nearly complete. Top bidders
to date are T-mobile, Verizon Wireless, and a consortium of cablecos
and Sprint Nextel. The bids now total US$13.7 billion. (See Telecom
Update #541)

http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id66

MTS BUYS RURAL MANITOBA CABLECO: MTS Allstream has bought Valley Cable
Vision, which provides cable TV and Internet service to about 4,000
customers in southern Manitoba.

BOISVERT STEPS DOWN AS TELESAT CEO: Larry Boisvert has retired after
13 years as President and CEO of Telesat Canada. He is replaced by Dan
Goldberg, previously CEO of the Netherlands-based satellite company
SES New Skies.

TOP EDUCATORS TO ADDRESS "ENTERPRISE NETWORKS 2006": Among the
speakers and topics at the Enterprise Networks conference, to be held
October 24-25 in Toronto:

** Gary Audin, "Convergence Crosses Boundaries: Time for a Reality Check"

** John Riddell, "New Age Enterprise Wireless"

** Michael Dunne, "IP Planning, Migration, and Implementation"

** Henry Dortmans, "What Every Enterprise Needs to Know about This Industry"

For more information and to register online, visit
http://www.enterprisenetworks.ca.

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE
E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There=20
are two formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the
   World Wide Web late Friday afternoon each week
   at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.

   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:
      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com
   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send=20
   an e-mail message to:
      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see http://www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further information,
including permission to reprint or reproduce, please e-mail
jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from sources which
we believe to be reliable, but Angus TeleManagement makes no
warranties or representations whatsoever regarding accuracy,
completeness, or adequacy.  Opinions expressed are based on
interpretation of available information, and are subject to change. If
expert advice on the subject matter is required, the services of a
competent professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

Subject: Dish Network unsolicited calls
Reply-To: jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu
Organization: University of Arkansas Alumni
From: haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:50:26 GMT


The phone rang this morning and I heard a recording offering me some
kind of free VCR or something.  So I punched the button they said to
and was connected to someone answering "installations" for Dish Network.
Once I knew who it was I hung up and filled out the complaint web page
with FTC, since I am on the do-not-call list.

Just wondering if anybody else is getting these calls.

jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:00:18 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years


An Ohio woman spent thousands of dollars leasing two rotary phones
over the course of four decades. Ester Strogen and her late husband
first got their hands on the rotary-dial devices in 1964, and the
Canton couple never saw a reason to cancel the contract, The
Repository reports. But now Strogen's granddaughters are buzzing mad,
estimating that their 82-year-old granny rang up more than $14,000 in
payments on the phones over the years.  But Lucent Technologies says
they've got the wrong number -- the $29.10 fee was charged quarterly,
not monthly, so Strogen paid only about $2,000 over the lease's
lifetime, according to the telephone company. Now that the
granddaughters are on the case, the black rotary dinosaurs have been
replaced by push-button phones.  And that makes Strogen sad. "I'd like
to have my rotary back," she said. "I like that better."

http://blog.wired.com/furthermore/index.blog?entry_id=1557341

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #335
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Sep 16 16:29:58 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 865652248; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #336
Message-Id: <20060916202735.865652248@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:30:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 336

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment (Carla K. Johnson)
    High Tech Shopping Carts Amuse Children But Face Hurdles (Greg Bluestein)
    Meet the $4-Million Dollar Woman (Robert Davis)
    California Governor to Sign Hang-Up-and-Drive Bill (Monty Solomon)
    Number That Won't Hang up (Jack Hamilton)
    Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone? (Curtis R Anderson)
    Verizon Online DSL to Drop Supplier Surcharge (Curtis R Anderson)
    Re: Dish Network Unsolicited Calls (Steven Lichter)
    Re: Dish Network Unsolicited Calls (support@sellcom.com)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:39:12 -0500
From: Carla K. Johnson AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment Against It


Anti-spam group says will not pay; plans to keep company on spam list 
By CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

The head of an organization that fights unwanted bulk e-mail said
Friday that an Illinois company will remain on its block list despite
a court order and a steep monetary judgment.

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Spamhaus Project, an
international anti-spam organization, to pay $11.7 million in damages
to Wheeling-based e360 Insight LLC for blacklisting the company.

U.S. District Judge Charles Kocoras also ordered Spamhaus to post a
notice on its Web site stating that e360 Insight is not a spammer.

The judge's order noted that Spamhaus initially defended the case, but
then withdrew. Without a challenge from Spamhaus, the judge wrote, "we
find that Spamhaus has wrongfully placed Plaintiffs on its blacklist
of companies who have sent spam e-mail."

Spamhaus suggested it did not defend the case because it did not
believe a court in Illinois had jurisdiction over the U.K.-based
organization.

Steve Linford, the head of the U.K.-based Spamhaus, insisted the
company sends spam that is illegal in the United Kingdom and said
Spamhaus will continue to list the Illinois company on its block list.

Internet service providers use Spamhaus lists to help identify
spammers and block e-mail coming from their Internet addresses. The
listing hurt the Illinois company's ability to do business as a direct
e-mail marketer, the lawsuit claimed.

"Spam is a big problem, but the way Spamhaus administers its blocking
technology is not a reasonable solution to this problem," said Dave
Linhardt, president of e360 Insight.

His company signs up people for direct marketing e-mails through its
BargainDepot.net Web site, and the people who sign up can control how
often they receive e-mails and stop them entirely any time, Linhardt
said.

"Our client does not send spam e-mails. Our client only sends e-mail
messages to persons opting in to a list where they agree to accept
e-mail announcements," Bart Loethen, a Chicago attorney representing
e360 Insight, said Friday in a written response to The Associated
Press.

Linford said Spamhaus has no offices, agents or business connections
in Illinois.

"The Illinois court very simply had no jurisdiction," he wrote in an
e-mail to the AP.

Loethen said if Spamhaus ignores the ruling "we will seek alternate
means of enforcing the judgment through the court system in the
U.S. and potentially the U.K."

"Spamhaus is thumbing its nose at the U.S. courts by failing to
participate in the process, failing to provide information in the
court case, and failing to comply with the orders of the court,"
Loethen said.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:43:10 -0500
From: Greg Bluestein AP  <ap@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: High Tech Shopping Carts Amuse Children But Face Hurdles


By GREG BLUESTEIN, Associated Press Writer

It took a grocer's offer of a cookie to finally tear 4-year-old Trey
Malcom away from the small TV screen in his shopping cart.

Even then, his eyes shot back to the monitor the moment he accepted
the sprinkled treat from the Publix grocery store clerk. "He's in his
own world," said his mother, Amy Malcom, who was for once at peace as
she filled her cart with veggies and snacks.

To parents, the TV Kart and its "Bob the Builder" and "Barney" videos
allow a few precious moments while they check off their grocery lists.
But to reluctant grocers, it could be nothing more than another
expense with little payoff in the notoriously low-margin grocery
business.

Over the years, high-tech shopping carts in one form or another have
been hyped as ways to keep people in stores longer and to spend more
money, only to fall short of expectations. Some blurted out recipe
tips or displayed video ads. Others spit out coupons while they rolled
down the aisles.

Each idea might have improved the stores' hip factor, but each also
had little immediate effect on bottom lines. And if grocers don't see
a bump in sales, high-tech carts quickly become expendable, said Dave
Hogan, the chief information officer of the Washington-based National
Retail Federation.

"There has to be a business rationale," Hogan said. "A customer might
think it's kind of cool, but there's got to be a payback. And they're
not proving their payback yet."

Still, companies are trying where others have failed, banking on
technological advances.

The Personal Shopping Assistant, developed by IBM Corp. and Cuesol
Inc., allows customers to fill out a grocery list on their home
computers, then log into the system at the store to organize their
trip.

A small screen mounted on a cart shows a running tally of what
customers buy and also can show where items on the list are
located. The system costs between $60,000 and $120,000 per store, and
they're being used in more than two dozen supermarkets, mostly in New
England.

"I don't know that grocers are ready yet. But I believe they are. And
I think they are because guys like us have finally found out what
makes sense," said Mike Grimes, Cuesol's vice president of sales and
business development. "In the next 12 months, we should know whether
this thing will catch fire or not."

A competing device called Concierge, which is made by Toronto-based
Springboard Retail Networks Inc., expects to announce a trial in a
major market by year's end, said Sylvain Perrier, the company's vice
president of technology.

Cabco Group Ltd., the New Zealand-based company that makes the TV
Kart, argues that past attempts failed because they offered shoppers
no real advantage.

"This is all about improving the shopping experience. Unless you're
going to do something that's going to give a direct customer benefit,
it's never going to catch on," said Doug Bartlett, the company's
business development manager.

So far, more than 2,000 TV Karts have been deployed at supermarkets in
eight states, mostly in the Midwest. Publix and Wal-Mart are among the
chains testing their popularity.

For $1, shoppers can rent the brightly colored carts, which play an
hourlong DVD of whichever children's television show adorns the side
"Barney," "Bob the Builder" or "The Wiggles."

They each look more like a toy car than a shopping cart, with
oversized doors on the sides and a narrow bench on which up to two
children can sit, buckle up and watch the TV in the dashboard. (The
screens are about the size of a TV dinner, and cart-pushers can hardly
hear the audio.)  Overhead, there are two storage bins offering rather
limited space for parents to pack their groceries, a frequent
complaint of the parents.

In engineering the $1,500 entertainment system on wheels, the company
had to develop a docking station to recharge the carts' batteries when
they're not in use. To deter theft, they lodged the monitor deep
within a hulking case and designed wheels that lock until they're
activated by a parent and skid to a halt when they roll past a
checkout line.

There's no doubt the carts are popular with toddlers, who point
immediately at their favorite characters as they walk through the
store's sliding doors.

"People are making special trips to the store," said Kevin Kidd, a
Publix store manager who said the three carts at his store in the
north Atlanta suburb of Alpharetta each log about 60 rides per week.

Yet Cabco and other cart builders still have a long way to go to
impress the grocery industry's picky decision makers, said Peter
Fader, a marketing professor at University of Pennsylvania's Wharton
School.

"They're very reluctant to make big investments unless there's a
proven payback," he said. "Something that changes behavior over time
is often not worth it. It's not just in respect to carts. It's in
respect to anything. Grocers just can't risk change."

If high-tech carts catch on, expect another side effect: Cart
conflicts at a supermarket near you.

Two-year-old twins Sam and Lindsay Rothman were babbling happily as
they strolled with their grandmother, Ann Kafetz, into the Publix
store in the north Atlanta suburb of Alpharetta. But when she passed
over the TV Kart for the old-fashioned variety, they broke down into
tantrums.

"It's the principle of the thing," she said, defending her decision.
"They have so much stuff. And they could live without it."

Not surprisingly, Sam disagreed. For the next few moments, his cries
of "I want Barney" echoed throughout the store.

On the Net:
TV Kart: http://www.tvkart.com/

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.


NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:45:39 -0500
From: Robert Davis <usatoday@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Meet the $4-Million Dollar Woman


By Robert Davis, USA TODAY

When her doctors first called her "The Bionic Woman," 26-year-old
Claudia Mitchell didn't understand the reference to the 1970s TV show
about the secret agent who was part woman, part machine.

Besides, the first woman to be outfitted with a bionic arm says that
when the motors are running in the 10-pound device, it reminds her of
another famous cyborg -- Arnold Schwarzenegger's The Terminator.

"It's really cool," she says. "This is not just something in the
movies.  This is really happening." Mitchell, a former U.S. Marine,
lost her left arm in 2004 on an Arkansas highway when the friend she
was riding with lost control of his motorcycle.

As she struggled to cope with the loss of the limb, she read a Popular
Science story about Jesse Sullivan, a Tennessee man who received the
first bionic arms at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago after
losing his in an electrical accident in 2001.

"I said, 'I've got to have one of those,' " Mitchell says.

Last year she had surgery and received an arm that's even more
advanced than Sullivan's. Today, in a Washington, D.C., news
conference with National Institutes of Health officials, Mitchell will
show off her skills with the arm developed in a $4 million project
funded largely by the NIH.

Though recent prosthetic research has focused on implanting sensors
that link devices to movement commands from the brain, Mitchell was
drawn to the less-invasive work in Chicago.

"Most people have been looking at trying to tap into the brain, but
that has a number of challenges," says Todd Kuiken, who heads neural
engineering at the Chicago institute. Implants are "becoming more
doable, but if something breaks you have to have surgery to fix
it. The exciting thing about this technique is we are not implanting
anything into her body."

Kuiken found a way to use chest muscles to connect the prosthetic to
nerves that once sent signals to the hand, wrist, elbow and shoulder.
After an amputation, the brain still thinks the arm is there. It feels
sensations and sends signals to move. But those signals are too weak
for modern mechanics to detect from the surface of the skin, so
Kuiken's team amplified them.

First, plastic surgeon Greg Dumanian of Northwestern Memorial Hospital
moved the targeted nerves into muscles in Mitchell's chest. Then, the
nerves that cause the motion of those muscles were disconnected.
Mitchell can no longer send a signal to flex her pectoral muscle, but
when she wants to close her hand or bend her elbow, the nerve impulse
moves her "pec."

When that muscle moves, it sends a signal strong enough for a sensor
on the skin to detect. After some rewiring by Dumanian, six muscles in
Mitchell's chest now move six motors in the bionic arm.

And nerve data flow up, too. When Kuiken touches a certain spot on
Mitchell's chest, she feels him touch her hand, even though it's no
longer there.

There is much still to sort out. Though Mitchell can perform a simple
task such as folding a pair of pants without first stretching them out
on a flat surface, Kuiken calls the arm clumsy. Both he and Mitchell
say they are optimistic about making the prosthetic -- hers and future
versions -- more sensitive and precise.

"We hope to be able to close the loop with Claudia and have the
sensation be there so that when she touches something, she feels a
touch of her hand," Kuiken says. Mitchell, who hopes to go to college
next year to study communications, says she is proud to be part of the
team.  "I am really excited about the prospects of being able to,
hopefully, pave the way to make this something that is more common,"
says Mitchell, a volunteer at Washington, D.C.-area military
hospitals.

Until today, her role in the bionic research project has been shrouded
in secrecy. But now, the former Marine who served in Kuwait can tell
the amputees she counsels about her arm and the research.

And some soldiers and Marines can now apply to follow Mitchell's lead.
Kuiken is looking for amputees who have lost arms above the elbow in
the past year.

Mitchell says some of the returnees she meets may be candidates. "I
have met these young women and men who are now changed forever," she
says. "I see how they are coping with life and how they are learning
to deal with their prosthesis. I know how they're feeling."

Some day, she says, the bionic arm may make it easier for amputees to
strap on a prosthesis and get on with their daily routines.

"I can open a spaghetti jar and hold it up at an angle and use a spoon
to empty it out," she says. "Small things like that may seem trivial
to a two-armed person, but it is very exciting to me."

Copyright 2006 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news from USA Today please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:44:11 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: California Governor to Sign Hang-Up-and-Drive Bill


Gov. to Sign Hang-Up-and-Drive Bill
Legislation banning the use of hand-held cellphones while driving 
goes into effect in 2008.

By Nancy Vogel, Times Staff Writer
September 15, 2006

SACRAMENTO - California will become the fourth state in the country to
ban motorists from holding cellphones while driving under legislation
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced he will sign into law today.

The governor's office said Thursday that the signing will take place
in Oakland, ending a five-year campaign by Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo
Alto) to outlaw one of the most common distractions of California
drivers.

Under the law, which will take effect in July 2008, Californians risk
a minimum $20 fine for driving while yakking into a phone -- unless
they are using a headset, speaker phone, ear bud or some other
technology that frees both hands while they talk. Drivers in emergency
situations would be exempt.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-me-cell15sep15,0,1147619.story

------------------------------

From: Jack Hamilton <jfh@acm.org>
Subject: Number That Won't Hang Up?
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:22:57 -0700


I couldn't think of a good subject line for this.  I'm thinking a
buying a new phone, and would like to test its reception in the places
I might use it.

Is there a number I can call that will stay connected for long periods
of time (an hour or more)?  I'd like to call it before I start to
work, and just listen the whole way.  If it loses the signal, I'll
know there's an area of poor reception, and I'll call the number back
to find the next area of poor reception.  I don't want a number that
will hang up after a short period, such as the local number for time,
because I don't want to have to keep dialing.

It doesn't have to be a toll-free number (all the plans I might buy
would have long-distance included).

Any ideas?  Ideally, it would have some mildly entertaining and not
irritating program, like a news radio station but not a right-wing
talk show.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:26:40 -0400
From: Curtis R Anderson <gleepy@gleepy.net>
Organization: Gleepy's Chaotic Henhouse
Subject: Re: Best Way to Answer a Business Phone?


Mr Joseph Singer wrote:

> It's funny that people got along just fine for *years* without auto
> attendants and being handled by a real person.  Auto attendants and
> IVRs especially when planned badly as some are that force you to go
> through countless obstacles when you really need to speak to a real
> person are crazy.  The people who design these auto attendants and
> IVRs should use some common sense.  It shouldn't be not obvious that
> if you want to speak to a real person you should be able to press 0 or
> just not say anything and time out to a real person.  Countless times
> I've tried to let it time out and instead of being transferred to
> someone who can help me the designers of the system think it's better
> to just drop the call.  TS for you!  If I'm on an IVR and the IVR
> cannot understand "operator" there's something really wrong in the
> design of a system.

Folks like my late father wouldn't get tone dial on their phones
because they didn't want to pay (then) Alltel NY the extra $1.25 /
month for DTMF support on their line card. He would just sit on the
line waiting for the rep to come on, doing something as simple as
getting a mail-order prescription filled. I had to tell him that the
NY Department of Labor circa 1995, for example, absolutely required
one to use a tone-dial phone to claim benefits. In fact, their system
would say "Make a selection or be disconnected" if there was no DTMF
response.

I tried to get him to at least use the tone toggle offered on many
landline sets, but he ultimately found the things he would need to
call in for and navigate a confusing menu, which is very difficult
when one is hard of hearing and misses choices, would be _much easier_
by accessing the appropriate web site and do it that way. Mail-order
prescription refills for those maintenance meds requested by the
pharmacy's web site gave him the confirmation he absolutely needed.

Getting back to the thread: where I work, our receptionist / traffic 
manager / freight quote and shipping wonderlady answers the phone by 
waiting for the ring, looking at the key phone to see which line lit, as 
we are two businesses in one location using FX lines to our new 
location. She will then say "Thank you for calling (Ace Widgets | Acme 
Widgets), this is (her name)" and let it go at that. She will direct the 
call to the appropriate office or to voice mail if she knows the person 
is out. If it's one of us shop apes or if she knows the office person is 
on the shop floor, she will press the "External Page" key, we will hear 
the 440 Hz tone and we wait for her announcement for who it is.

If I were to call a business and hear what is choice D in this thread, I 
would think they are trying to kiss up to certain parts of my anatomy.

Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still
"In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..."
http://www.gleepy.net/                 ICQ: 50137888
mailto:gleepy@gleepy.net (and others)  Yahoo!: gleepythehen

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:47:30 -0400
From: Curtis R Anderson <gleepy@gleepy.net>
Organization: Gleepy's Chaotic Henhouse
Subject: Verizon Online DSL to Drop Supplier Surcharge


I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but last week Verizon
sent me an email stating that they would not collect the DSL Supplier
Surcharge after all.

The email cites "customer concerns" as the reason for the change, but I 
think it has more to do with the FCC breathing on them a bit.

That action should finally lower my phone bill by about $1.50 a month 
now, instead of that paltry 12 cents they wanted to.

Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still
"In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..."
http://www.gleepy.net/                 ICQ: 50137888
mailto:gleepy@gleepy.net (and others)  Yahoo!: gleepythehen

------------------------------

From: Steven Lichter <DieSpammer@Ikillspammers.com>
Organization: I Kill Spammers, inc.
Subject: Re: Dish Network Unsolicited Calls
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:52:05 GMT


Jim Haynes wrote:

> The phone rang this morning and I heard a recording offering me some
> kind of free VCR or something.  So I punched the button they said to
> and was connected to someone answering "installations" for Dish Network.
> Once I knew who it was I hung up and filled out the complaint web page
> with FTC, since I am on the do-not-call list.

> Just wondering if anybody else is getting these calls.

For the most part these are companies that sell the service for them,
or are independent installation companies.  I have gotten a few calls
and am on the do not call list.  My biggest complaint with them is
Dish Network offers its customers an option to get credits towards your
bill by getting your friends and families to join the service. What it
must mean to some people is to get an e-mail spammers list and send it
to all 500 million of their friends or post it in every newsgroup on
the net.  Dish Network does not condone this, but they also will very
rarely take any action against the person or company that does it.

The only good spammer is a dead one!!  Have you hunted one down today? 
(c) 2006 I Kill Spammers, inc, A Rot in Hell. Co.

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Dish Network Unsolicited Calls
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:47:05 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes) said on that big USENET thingie:

> The phone rang this morning and I heard a recording offering me some
> kind of free VCR or something.  So I punched the button they said to
> and was connected to someone answering "installations" for Dish Network.
> Once I knew who it was I hung up and filled out the complaint web page
> with FTC, since I am on the do-not-call list.

> Just wondering if anybody else is getting these calls.

Not those but others ...

Here is a useful:

https://www.donotcall.gov/Complain/ComplainCheck.aspx

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #336
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sun Sep 17 21:14:14 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 3BD6F21B9; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:14:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #337
Message-Id: <20060918011414.3BD6F21B9@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:14:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:15:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 337

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Bishop Tutu's Life to be Digitized on Web Site (Oliver Holmes, Reuters)
    Security Products Sold Despite Freeware (Anick Jesdanun, AP)
    Amid Privacy Backlash, Web Publishers Turn Inward (Eric Auchard, Reuters)
    Textphone - or TDD/TTY - Access Numbers in Holland / Switzerland (Radium)
    AT&T's Advertised DSL Speed vs Reality? (John Doe)
    Re: Number That Won't Hang Up? (Gene S. Berkowitz)
    Re: Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years (support@sellcom.com)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:32:16 -0500
From: Oliver Holmes <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Bishop Tutu's Life to be Digitzed on Web Site


By Oliver Holmes

Archbishop Desmond Tutu's alma mater said on Friday it is launching an
Internet archive with thousands of documents and audio tapes on the
life of the South African Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

The 4.5 million-pound project will provide a free, interactive digital
resource about his humanitarian teachings and South Africa's struggle
for democracy, King's College said.

King's computer experts will collaborate with the University of the
Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and the University of the Western Cape
in Cape Town to digitize up to 200,000 pages of documents and over
1,000 hours of live audio.

Hundreds of hours of video as well as films, photos and personal
letters will also be included.

King's estimates the archive could have 93 million potential users and
said it would be delivered free to all schools across South Africa as
a teaching resource.

"As one of the great leaders of out time -- and, incidentally, a
King's College alumnus -- Archbishop Tutu continues to bring messages
of hope to a troubled world," said Professor Richard Trainor, King's
college London principal.

Tutu studied at King's in the 1960s and in 2004 returned to the
college as a professor in post-conflict studies.

The Desmond Tutu Digital Archive will be launched in Cape Town on
September 25 when the human rights veteran celebrates his 75th
birthday at a reception hosted by the British High Commissioner, Paul
Boateng.

"I am humbled to be at the center of such an initiative, but if it can
help spread understanding and, dare I say it, love, around the world,
then surely it must be a good thing," said Tutu, who turns 75 on
October 7.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:36:09 -0500
From: Anick Jesdanun, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Security Products Sold Despite Freeware


By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer

Microsoft gives away a security firewall with its latest operating 
system. Many high-speed Internet service providers offer free anti-virus 
protection for subscribers. And several Web sites distribute free 
toolbars to warn of Web scams.

AOL even recently made a package of basic security tools -- anti-virus, 
anti-spyware and firewall programs --  available for free to anyone, not 
just paying subscribers.

Despite all the free protection, primarily for Windows computers,
leading security vendors are moving forward with plans to start
selling their annual slate of security products this fall.

Why bother, when so much is available elsewhere at no cost?

"I absolutely don't argue that the highly tech-savvy consumer will and
can search the Web for freeware and knock out 90, maybe 95 percent of
the risk," said Lane Bess, Trend Micro Inc.'s general manager for
consumer products. "That's not the largest (base of) consumers out
there."

Most people, he said, would rather install a package -- for $50 in Trend 
Micro's case --  that does everything.

Free often means cobbling a package together:

 -- Taking the basic firewall that comes with the Service Pack 2
version of Microsoft Corp.'s Windows XP, or getting a stronger one
like Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s Zone Alarm to monitor
and block outbound traffic as well;

 -- Adding anti-virus protection from a high-speed Internet provider
like Comcast Corp. or Time Warner Inc.'s Road Runner;

 -- Obtaining one or more free spyware removal tools like Spybot
Search & Destroy;

 -- Installing a toolbar from EarthLink Inc. or elsewhere to block Web
sites known to engage in e-mail "phishing" scams.

Even AOL's free all-in-one package, which uses technology from McAfee
Inc. and others, is incomplete, said Joel Davidson, an AOL executive
vice president for products and technologies.

Last week, the Time Warner unit announced that subscribers who pay $26
a month will get additional protections, such as a stronger firewall
and alerts when malicious software tries to send out a bank account or
credit card number. They'll even get more online storage for backup
and free insurance for identity theft and computer damage.

The free standalone products have even more limits.

Major e-mail providers scan messages for viruses automatically, but
they won't address threats that come from instant messaging or a rogue
Web site, or a virus already on the computer.

Trend Micro's free HouseCall virus scanner covers those situations,
but users must remember to periodically perform a check, and they
won't be automatically protected in the interim. Same goes for the
free scan from Microsoft; automated scanning comes with Windows Live
OneCare, which costs $50 a year for up to three computers and includes
computer backup and tuneup services.

And while Microsoft plans a more robust firewall in its upcoming
Windows Vista operating system, it's holding back enough to justify
selling OneCare separately.

The free Zone Alarm, meanwhile, will generate a pop-up warning when
newly installed software attempts to connect to the outside world. The
$40 Zone Alarm Pro will have a continually updated database of
programs that researchers know as good or bad, so pop-up prompts only
come up in rare cases.

"I don't think (the free version) reduces protection, but it is
definitely less convenient," said Laura Yecies, general manager of
Check Point's Zone Labs consumer division. "The user is essentially
then putting themselves in the role of making determinations."

The free and subscription versions of Grisoft Inc.'s anti-virus and
anti-spyware products are nearly identical, but paying customers can
get technical help from humans, instead of only the software's help
files and Web site documents.

And free software won't come with the ability for companies to easily
update all their computers remotely, an issue for larger
organizations, said Johannes B. Ullrich, chief research officer with
the SANS Institute security group.

Google Inc., Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - news) and computer
manufacturers distribute free security products as well, but they are
trial versions often with features disabled, said Kraig Lane, Symantec
Corp.'s manager for consumer security products.

The six-month Symantec software bundled with Google, for instance,
will block known viruses but won't detect unknown ones, based on
behavioral patterns, in the hours before a software update can be
developed and distributed for new threats.

"We want to have a little extra value" for paying customers, Lane
said.

Other restrictions are in the free software's license terms.

A standalone version of AOL's anti-virus software, from Kaspersky Lab,
comes with terms that permit AOL to send e-mail marketing messages,
while Sophos Inc. gives free software only if a person's employer or
school is already a paying customer.

Some security is better than no security, said Bruce Schneier, a
computer security expert with Counterpane Internet Security Inc. "I
can complain about them (the free products), but going out free to
millions and millions of users, you have to like that."

Yet it's not entirely clear how many users even know of the free
offerings.

Bari Abdul, McAfee's vice president for consumer marketing, said
Internet users often configure their browsers to bypass home pages
that high-speed service providers use to promote free software.

AOL subscriber Gail Taylor, a teaching assistant at the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, said she never knew AOL gave away
security software.

But even after checking a number of free products at the request of
The Associated Press, she said she still couldn't decide which of the
free or fee offerings work best for her. She said she'd need to find
time for more research, leaving her computer largely unguarded for
now.

Consumers who do install free products may be left with a false sense
of security, added David Luft, a senior vice president for security
vendor CA Inc.

"Some of those limitations aren't always obvious to the end users
until they run into a problem they thought might be addressed," he
said. "They think they have something that's fully protecting them,
when in reality they don't protect in a way they might need."

On the Net:

AOL package: http://daol.aol.com/safetycenter
Grisoft: http://free.grisoft.com
Spybot: http://www.safer-networking.org

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day from Associated Press, please go
to:  http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:38:16 -0500
From: Eric Auchard, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Amid Privacy Backlash, Web Publishers Turn Inward


By Eric Auchard

Technological changes and personal privacy have been at odds ever
since modern notions of privacy emerged more than a century ago.

"Numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that
'what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the
housetops'," wrote two Boston lawyers in 1890 in a seminal paper that
articulated the modern "right to be left alone" that is the basis of
U.S. privacy law.

Lately, it's been dawning on computer users that our machines say a
lot more about us than many of us may realize.

Once it was the invention of the camera, the high-speed printer,
tabloid newspapers, the telephone. Now it's the computer, mobile
camera phones, video surveillance, the always-on Internet, blogging
and social network dating sites.

"If I am a corporate lawyer by day and a Level 10 Elf by night, I am
not sure I want everyone to know my different identities," says David
Holtzman, author of a forthcoming book "Privacy Lost: How Technology
is Endangering your Privacy."

Fast-growing U.S. social network Web site Facebook found out the hard
way last week when it introduced a new feature to its member profile
pages that allowed users to track their friends' online activities. A
vast outpouring of protest among college students forced the company
to introduce new privacy features as critics parodied the site as
"Stalkbook."

CELEBRITIES IN THE MAKING

The 2004 U.S. presidential election turned in part on a furious online
debate over whether George W. Bush or John Kerry lied about their war
records.

But it's not just politicians that are subject to such scrutiny;
increasingly we all are. The impulse of everyone from job recruiters
to casual acquaintances and first-time daters is to look online and
see what the Web says.

"Our whole lives are up for review online," Holtzman says. "We are all
now becoming like politicians," he adds.

Only recently, a decade after the Web went commercial, have Internet
companies begun to come to grips with how they might use tighter
privacy controls in order to expand people's willingness to express
themselves.

"Now we are turning inward and thinking of blogging as more of a
private experience," says Mena Trott, who with her husband, Ben,
co-founded Six Apart, the company behind TypePad and LiveJournal, some
of the most popular blog services.

Six Apart is set to formally introduce next month a new Web publishing
system it calls Vox that includes strong built-in privacy protections
to help users share messages and photos while retaining control over
who sees particular items.

It's not so much privacy as it is the ability to control one's own
publicity. "Obscurity isn't enough," Trott says. "You need to have the
features to say, 'I only want these (specific) people to see this'."

THAT QUEASY ONLINE FEELING

The explosion of self-publishing made possible by easy-to-use blog
tools has accentuated the tension between openness and privacy that
has existed since the Web was created by academics looking to share
research with colleagues online.

Web users have been forced to become always-on extroverts, whether or
not everyone is prepared for the consequences of instant celebrity.

"When the context of personal information shifts, users find out they
really don't have the control they thought," says John Poisson, the
founder and chief executive of Tiny Pictures Inc., a San Francisco
start-up that has introduced an entirely private online site called
Radar.net for sharing photos directly from camera phones with one's
friends and family.

"A fundamental part of social interaction is an assumption that you
and I forget little things about one another over time," Holtzman
says.  "With digitized information you don't forget."

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines of interest, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html  (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/internet-news/html

------------------------------

From: Radium <glucegen1@excite.com>
Subject: Textphone -- or TDD/TTY -- Access Numbers in Holland and Switzerland
Date: 16 Sep 2006 18:42:31 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hi:

I am looking for textphone access numbers in Holland and Switzerland.
I've done an extensive Google search but haven't come up with any. I
am posting from the USA.

To dial to Holland: 011-31 and then the number;
For Switzerland, dial 011-41 and then the number;
Textphone is a device for those with deafness.

When I dial the number, I should hear the sounds generated by the
textphone on the other end.

Dial any TDD/TTY/Textphone/Minicom number and you'll hear it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_device_for_the_deaf

TDD = Telecommunications Device for the Deaf

TTY = Telephone TYpewriter or TeleTYpewriter

TDD and TTY are terms used in USA and Canada. In most of Europe is its
called "textphone" and in the UK its called "minicom".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baudot

TDD/TTY/Textphone/Minicom use the Baudot code.

Any assistance on this matter is appreciated.

Thanks,

Radium

------------------------------

Subject: AT&T's Advertised DSL Speed vs Reality?
From: John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid>
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:17:46 GMT


Does anyone connect at AT&T's advertised DSL speed?

According to technicians at AT&T, my phone line is capable of 9 Mb per 
second.

I have had the Pro Package which is supposed to be up to 3 Mb per
second "depending on customer location" but I always connected at
about 2400 kbs.

What does "depending on customer location" mean, if not what the wire
is capable of handling?

By the way; Since I know I will get 2400 kbps if I go with the Pro 
Package again, I'm wondering what will I get if I go with the Express 
Package?

Anybody have the Express Package? What is your real connection speed?

Thank you.

------------------------------

From: Gene S. Berkowitz <first.last@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Number That Won't Hang Up?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:03:32 -0400


In article <telecom25.336.5@telecom-digest.org>, jfh@acm.org says...

> I couldn't think of a good subject line for this.  I'm thinking a
> buying a new phone, and would like to test its reception in the places
> I might use it.

> Is there a number I can call that will stay connected for long periods
> of time (an hour or more)?  I'd like to call it before I start to
> work, and just listen the whole way.  If it loses the signal, I'll
> know there's an area of poor reception, and I'll call the number back
> to find the next area of poor reception.  I don't want a number that
> will hang up after a short period, such as the local number for time,
> because I don't want to have to keep dialing.

> It doesn't have to be a toll-free number (all the plans I might buy
> would have long-distance included).
> Any ideas?  Ideally, it would have some mildly entertaining and not
> irritating program, like a news radio station but not a right-wing
> talk show.

You could be evil and try a major computer manufacturer or leading
software provider's tech support line. Good for 15-60 minutes, and
they usually give you a prediction of how long it will be until your
call is answered.  I'm pretty sure Bill Gate's old company had a "DJ"
while you wait.

If you actually get a rep on the line, tell them that you can't find
the "any" key on your new computer.

Gene

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:52:07 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com> said on that big USENET thingie:

> the black rotary dinosaurs have been replaced by push-button phones.
> And that makes Strogen sad. "I'd like to have my rotary back," she
> said. "I like that better."

They should be able to find her one I would think.

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #337
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Sep 18 19:39:28 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 811112280; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #338
Message-Id: <20060918233928.811112280@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:40:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 338

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Personalized Service May be Key to Success of Internet-TV (Monty Solomon)
    How to Spam Cell Phones (NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us)
    Citizens to Acquire Commonwealth Telephone (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 18, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Western Union Begins Investor Road Show for Upcoming (Nigel Allen)
    Re: AT&T's Advertised DSL Speed vs Reality? (Steven Lichter)
    Re: Dish Network Unsolicited calls (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years (Paul W. Schleck)
    Re: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Judgment (Koos van den Hout)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:05:20 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Personalized Service May be Key to Success of Internet-TV Links


By Scott Kirsner

Ever since Steve Jobs began prefacing Apple's product names with a
lower-case 'i', with the introduction of the turquoise iMac desktop
computer in 1998, the company has been on a tear. The iPod upstaged
every digital music player that preceded it, and the accompanying
iTunes Music Store made it cool to purchase music legally online.

But was Apple's disclosure of iTV last week the first step toward
reinventing television? The company's $299 set-top device, designed to
wirelessly connect the television with a Mac or PC, won't be available
until early next year, but expectations are high that Apple will
create a new viewing experience by linking the TV with the digital
realm.

Plenty of other companies have tried to forge that link, without much
success. Microsoft introduced its Windows Media Center Edition in
2002, a version of its operating system designed to turn a PC sitting
next to the television into a DVD player, digital video recorder,
music library, and gateway to the Internet. Akimbo Systems of San
Mateo, Calif., introduced an Internet-connected set-top box in 2004,
and TiVo has made video from the Web available on its devices, in part
through a partnership with Brightcove, a Cambridge start-up.

But consumers may not feel like there's something lacking on the small
screen. Apple is  proposing to deliver primarily new  and old TV shows
and movies like NBC's 'The  Office' or Disney's 'The English Patient',
but  that's content readily  available at  video stores,  via Netflix,
recorded  on a  digital  video  recorder, or  purchased  from a  cable
video-on-demand service.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/09/17/personalized_service_may_be_key_to_success_of_internet_tv_links/

------------------------------

From: NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us
Subject: How to Spam Cell Phones
Date: 18 Sep 2006 07:56:31 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Ebay item: BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY SMS TEXT MESSAGE MARKETING

see
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=140028453714&ssPageName=MERCOSI_VI_ROSI_PR4_PCN_BIX&refitem=300024889777&itemcount=4&refwidgetloc=closed_view_item&refwidgettype=osi_widget

or
http://snipurl.com/SMSspam

Pat:
You may wish to simply write a review and eliminate the links.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well, I can tell you this much: if it
is something E-Bay is selling, I would generally stay away from it.
That is, unless you want even more spam as a result. I have purchased
_ONE_ item via E-Bay in my lifetime, a cellular phone which was not
all that great, and I have been spammed ever since. E-Bay says it is
not them doing the spamming, and that is probably correct; it is
people who are members there who think nothing of checking through the
customer records and then attempting to trick other folks into a
response to their 'complaints' etc. The address 'spoof@ebay.com' is
absolutely useless. Unlike their sister company PayPal, where you can
simply forward whatever crapola shows up and they at least make an
effort to close down the site, with E-Bay, letters complaining about
that stuff go nowhere. The big thing now, it seems, is to send members
of E-Bay's community 'partial' letters of complaint, with a link
address to click on to respond. The partial letter says something like
"That gizmo you sold me; when are you going to deliver it?" and the
partial letter always goes on to say "E-Bay takes this complaint very
seriously. Please respond direct to this member if you wish to retain
your good standing with E-Bay."  etcetera.  How big a thing is 'big
thing'?  Oh, I get anywhere from 50 to 75 of them each time I log on
here. I finally relented and answered just one of them the other day;
I used the 'f-word' in every form I could think of using it; as a
verb, a noun, a preposition, an adjective, an adverb, you name it. And
I did not bother to sign it. I sent my reply as an independent
email to the site named prior to the cgi-bin which included ebay in
the end of it. I did not get a futher reply from the goofus who sent
it out to me, but I did conclude by telling him I hoped he felt my
'customer service' had been good. Those people are really beginning to
make me get very angry.   PAT] 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:23:25 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Citizens to Acquire Commonwealth Telephone


USTelecom dailyLead
September 18, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/evmwfDtusXcllDwPKJ

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Citizens to acquire Commonwealth Telephone
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Telecom Italia buys AOL's German business
* Analysis: Tough times loom for EchoStar
* Is there a viable business model for 4G?
* Satellite stock swap driven by differing visions
* RIM targets broader consumer market with Pearl device
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies
HOT TOPICS
* AT&T to stream TV to online users
* Report: BellSouth plans VDSL2 upgrade
* Apple unveils device to link online content to TV sets
* Telecoms become hot target for buyout firms
* Broadwing, XO reportedly discussing merger
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Intel researchers announce chip breakthrough
* To keep viewers, networks had to go online
* YouTube in video partnership with Warner Music
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Telecom Italia chairman resigns after proposing split of wireless,
  fixed-line assets
DIVERSIONS
* It's Dogster, for When Family Pets Network
* That $5,000-a-Day Villa? Maybe Next Season.
* Nicholson and Scorsese, Partners in Crime at Last
* Fortune's Fools: Why the Rich Go Broke
* Ethiopia Opens Its Doors, Slowly

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 18, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:06:32 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 18, 2006
********************************

Vodafone, FastWeb Sign Broadband Deal
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19935?11228

     Vodafone Italy and Italian alternative broadband provider FastWeb
     have signed an agreement to offer a joint broadband service,
     making Italy the latest market where Vodafone has ditched its
     mobile-only status.  The new service is branded as Vodafone Casa
     FastWeb and is set to debut shortly. Earlier this month, Vodafone
     Germany launched a ...

Revenue Assurance Takes on a New Name
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19926?11228

     Compared with service providers in the United States, it is
     generally agreed that European service providers have been more
     than focus solely on revenue and cost, service providers in both
     Europe and the United States are turning their attention to
     end-to-end business ...

Time Warner to Sell AOL Germany to Telecom Italia

     FRANKFURT, Germany&nbsp;-- Time Warner Inc. has agreed to sell AOL
     Germany's Internet access business to Telecom Italia SpA for
     675 million (US$856 million), the companies said, giving
     the Milan company a firm foothold in the German market.  The
     all-cash deal, which is subject to regulatory approval, is expected
     to ...

Phone Data Offers Real-time Traffic Routing
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19920?11228

     Being stuck in traffic is never fun, but a new technology that
     transforms cell phone location data into an illuminated traffic
     map promises to make road congestion at least a little more
     avoidable.  The system takes advantage of the steady stream of
     positioning cues, the untraced signals that all cell phones
     produce, whether in use or ...

Microsoft's Zune Gets Social with Wireless
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19918?11228

     Microsoft is attempting to take in Apple Computer with the launch
     of its Zune media player, set to debut this holiday
     season. Unlike Apple's offering, however, Zune will feature
     wireless technology to make the device more social.  Wireless
     Zune-to-Zune sharing lets consumers spontaneously share
     full-length sample tracks of ...

Telecom Italia CEO Resigns
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19915?11228

     In a nearly unprecedented machine-gun-paced series of events
     during the past 72 hours, Telecom Italia's (TI) embattled CEO
     has resigned over opposition to his plan to split the company in
     half, the prime minister of Italy was forced by the opposition to
     face Parliamentary questioning over his forcing the resignation,
     it was revealed ...

BT Plans Further Global Push
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19910?11228

     BT Group plc set out its international stall for analysts and the
     press at a London briefing Thursday, announcing revenue targets
     and hinting at further expansion through acquisitions. The
     carrier says its Global Services division, which provides network
     and IT services to large corporate customers in sectors such
     as ...


TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:03:20 -0400
From: Nigel Allen <ndallen@interlog.com>
Subject: Western Union Begins Investor Road Show for Upcoming


The following press release was issued by Western Union.  I do not
work for Western Union, but I thought the press release might be be of
interest.

Attention Business Editors:

Western Union Begins Investor Road Show for Upcoming Spin-off;
Provides Financial Outlook as Standalone Company

DENVER, September 18 /CNW/ - Western Union today announced that it
will be making presentations to the equity investment community in
preparation for its planned September 29, 2006 spin-off from First
Data Corp. (NYSE:FDC). The meetings will be led by Christina Gold,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Western Union, David Barnes,
Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategic Development, and
Scott Scheirman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. The company's road show presentation is available at
http://www.westernunion.com

Financial Outlook

Western Union will provide financial guidance during the
presentations.  Assuming completion of its separation from First Data
on September 29, 2006, Western Union expects revenue for 2006 of $4.4
billion to $4.5 billion, an increase of between 11% and 12% from 2005
revenue of $4.0 billion. For 2006, the company expects operating
income of $1.32 billion to $1.34 billion, excluding expenses related
to its spin-off from First Data, which is 4% to 6% higher than 2005.

For 2007, Western Union expects revenue growth in the range of 10% to
12%, excluding acquisitions. In addition, the company expects
operating income growth of 6% to 9%, excluding the impact of expenses
related to its spin-off from First Data. 

A chart detailing the company's guidance is attached to this release.

Western Union's long-term objective beyond 2007 is to deliver revenue
and operating profit growth of 10% to 12% on an annual basis and
annual EPS growth of 12% to 14%.  

Ms. Gold said: "Western Union has a compelling long-term growth story,
with the proven strategy and track record, global agent network,
seasoned management team and financial strength to remain the
preeminent provider of money transfer services across the globe. The
separation from First Data creates rich new opportunities for the
company to invest its strong cash flow in continuing to expand
services in key growth regions of the world; in marketing efforts,
including our highly successful Gold Card Loyalty program; and in
continuing to enhance customer convenience and choice. We see
favorable long-term trends in the global money transfer market and, as
an independent company, will be better positioned to capture them."

Ms. Gold continued: "In the near term, we expect the company will
continue to be affected by softness in its U.S. domestic and U.S. to
Mexico consumer-to-consumer money transfer businesses. As previously
discussed, we believe the slower growth rates in these markets largely
reflect the uncertainty caused by the immigration debate and the
related activities in the U.S. In addition, our operating profits for
2006 and 2007 will reflect increased investment in the business to
address this issue, to secure future growth, as well as the shift in
our business mix, reflecting higher growth from our international
business, which carries lower profit margins."  

Ms. Gold concluded: "We believe the slowdown related to the
immigration debate is a temporary issue, and our 2007 guidance assumes
revenue growth in the U.S. and U.S. to Mexico businesses will begin to
improve but will not reach levels experienced in 2005. In addition, we
expect that our international consumer-to-consumer money transfer
business, which currently represents 60% of our revenues and does not
include U.S. to Mexico transactions, will remain strong throughout
2006 and 2007. The geographic diversity of our business, which is a
key strength for Western Union, should enable us to generate solid
results despite the temporary issues we are addressing in the U.S. and
U.S. to Mexico markets."

hird Quarter Financial Update

During its road show presentation, Western Union will also provide
updates on several transaction growth rates excluding Vigo. For the
third quarter through September 14, the company's overall
consumer-to-consumer transactions grew 15% on a year-over-year
basis. International transactions grew 23% for the same period. In
addition, for the third quarter through September 14, Western
Union-branded transactions from the U.S. to Mexico grew 3% on a
year-over-year basis, while domestic transactions declined by 4%.

Western Union expects to issue its third quarter 2006 earnings press
release after the market close on October 23. The company will also
host a conference call.

Non-GAAP Measures

In certain circumstances results have been presented that are non-GAAP
(generally accepted accounting principles) measures and should be
viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, the company's reported
results.  Reconciliations to comparable GAAP measures are available in
the accompanying schedule to this press release.

About Western Union

Western Union, together with its affiliates Orlandi Valuta and Vigo,
are leaders in global money transfer, providing people with fast,
reliable and convenient ways to send money around the world, pay bills
and purchase money orders through a network of over 270,000 agent
locations in more than 200 countries and territories. For more
information, visit www.westernunion.com.

Guidance Tables


    <<               2006 Financial Guidance

                           6 Months
                          June 30, 2006         FY 2006
                   -------------------------------------
    Total Revenue          $2.2B  (A)       $4.4B - $4.5B
       Growth                13%             11% - 12%

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Operating Income, excluding spin
     expenses (C): non-recurring and
     ongoing                $641M (B)    $1,320M - $1,340M (D)
       Growth                 5%              4% - 6%


    (A) Includes $68 million of revenue related to the acquisition of Vigo
        in October 2005.
    (B) Includes $11 million of stock compensation, SFAS 123R expense.
    (C) Spin expenses represent estimated incremental expenses associated
        with operating as a stand-alone company. Ongoing spin expenses
        relate to staffing additions and related costs to replace First
        Data support, corporate governance, information technology,
        corporate branding and global affairs, benefits and payroll
        administration, procurement, and other expenses related to being a
        stand-alone company. Non-recurring spin expenses relate to
        recruiting and relocation expenses associated with hiring key
        management positions new to our company, other employee
        compensation expenses and temporary labor used to develop ongoing
        processes. See reconciliation to Operating Income (GAAP) in
        Appendix.
    (D) Growth in Operating Income excluding spin expenses: non-recurring
        and ongoing in Q3 06 is expected to be below the 4% - 6% range and
        Operating Income excluding spin expenses in Q4 06 is expected to
        be above the 4% - 6% range. Expense timing and other factors drive
        the majority of the expected profit growth differences in Q3 and
        Q4.



                          2007 Growth Outlook

    Total Revenue              10% - 12%

    Operating Income, excluding spin expenses (A):
     non-recurring and ongoing  6% - 9%


    (A) Spin expenses represent estimated incremental expenses associated
        with operating as a stand-alone company. Ongoing spin expenses
        relate to staffing additions and related costs to replace First
        Data support, corporate governance, information technology,
        corporate branding and global affairs, benefits and payroll
        administration, procurement, and other expenses related to being a
        stand-alone company. Non-recurring spin expenses relate to
        recruiting and relocation expenses associated with hiring key
        management positions new to our company, other employee
        compensation expenses and temporary labor used to develop ongoing
        processes. See reconciliation to Operating Income (GAAP) in
        Appendix.

    Note: Revenue and operating income guidance exclude any potential
    impact from future acquisitions


              Reg G Reconciliation - Operating Income

    (in Millions)

                           6 Months
                         June 30,2006         FY 2006
                   -------------------------------------
    Operating Income,        $641        $1,320  to  $1,340
       excluding spin expenses: 4%          6%
       non-recurring and ongoing

    Less spin expenses           Non-recurring
                                 $2 
                                 20          20
       Ongoing                   20          20



    Operating Income (GAAP)      $639        $1,280  to  $1,300
                                 1%          2%
    Operating Income excluding spin expenses: non-recurring and ongoing
    has been displayed to allow the financial reader improved
    comparability of 2006 financial performance.  However, the financial
    reader should be aware that ongoing spin expenses are part of the
    company's future cost structure.

For further information: The Western Union Company Media Sherry Johnson,
720-332-4750 Sherry.l.Johnson@westernunion.com or Investors Gary Kohn,
720-332-8276 Gary.Kohn@westernunion.com

------------------------------

From: Steven Lichter <diespammers@ikillspammers.com>
Organization: I Kill Spammers, Inc.
Subject: Re: AT&T's Advertised DSL Speed vs Reality?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:59:57 GMT


John Doe wrote:

> Does anyone connect at AT&T's advertised DSL speed?

> According to technicians at AT&T, my phone line is capable of 9 Mb per 
> second.

> I have had the Pro Package which is supposed to be up to 3 Mb per
> second "depending on customer location" but I always connected at
> about 2400 kbs.

> What does "depending on customer location" mean, if not what the wire
> is capable of handling?

> By the way; Since I know I will get 2400 kbps if I go with the Pro 
> Package again, I'm wondering what will I get if I go with the Express 
> Package?

> Anybody have the Express Package? What is your real connection speed?

> Thank you.

I have had the Pro for 2 years and have yet to get anything below 3008 
kbs.  I guess maybe it is because I'm less then a mile from the switch, 
but I'm also on some very old cable.

The Only Good Spammer is a Dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? 
(c) 2006  I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot In Hell Co.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Dish Network unsolicited calls
Date: 18 Sep 2006 11:10:35 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)

Jim Haynes <jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu> wrote:

> The phone rang this morning and I heard a recording offering me some
> kind of free VCR or something.  So I punched the button they said to
> and was connected to someone answering "installations" for Dish Network.
> Once I knew who it was I hung up and filled out the complaint web page
> with FTC, since I am on the do-not-call list.

>Just wondering if anybody else is getting these calls.

No calls, just lots of spam e-mail.  The thing is, the Dish Network
sells through local affiliates, and they don't seem to exert much
control over how those affiliates behave.  So what you almost
certainly received was an illicit call from a local business selling
Dish Network services.  If you call the Dish Network guys, even if you
have the name of the local affiliate, they will act as if it's not
their problem.  So when it happens again, get the name of the local
company making the offer and go after them.

I constantly get barraged with spam mail from various Dish affiliates,
and the corporate guys don't care at all that their name is being
dragged through the mud.

scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

From: Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@novia.net>
Subject: Re: Widow Leases Phones for 42 Years
Date: 18 Sep 2006 10:46:01 -0500
Organization: Novia Internetworking, http://www.novia.net/


In <telecom25.337.7@telecom-digest.org> support@sellcom.com writes:

> Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com> said on that big USENET thingie:

>> the black rotary dinosaurs have been replaced by push-button phones.
>> And that makes Strogen sad. "I'd like to have my rotary back," she
>> said. "I like that better."

> They should be able to find her one I would think.

> Steve

Indeed.

Back in the Telecom Digest archives is a 1991 article from me (Message
ID <16318@accuvax.nwu.edu>) where I noted that there were several
suppliers of refurbished Western-Electric phones.  The prices were very
modest (about $20 apiece).  Today, many such phones sell for similar
prices on eBay.  Even fully-restored Princess phones in obscure colors
can be gotten for less than $100.

Circa-1995, I was staying at the house of a elderly friend of the
family, since deceased, who was still leasing her phones.  This was the
same person who had a party line at her vacation cabin in New Hampshire,
as I noted in another article in the Digest (Message ID
<telecom11.532.4@eecs.nwu.edu>).  At least one model was an old Bakelite
version like the one in the Bunker house in the TV show "All in the
Family."  I suggested that she could either:

- Buy out her equipment from the phone company, including the lovely
  antique, for a modest price and not have to pay leasing fees again.

*or*

- Let me obtain, at no cost to her, several refurbished Western Electric
  phones like she had, with modular jacks.  I could leave her a "hot
  spare" she could switch out immediately if any of them ever failed, no
  hassle.

She declined both options, stating that she liked the peace of mind of
being able to call the phone company and have "a man" come over and fix
it.  I'm not sure if the relatively recent development of charging
significant fees for home repair visits would have changed her mind.


Paul W. Schleck
pschleck@novia.net
http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger pschleck@novia.net for PGP Public Key

------------------------------

From: Koos van den Hout <koos+newsposting@kzdoos.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment Against It
Date: 18 Sep 2006 15:58:21 GMT
Organization: http://idefix.net/~koos/


Carla K. Johnson AP <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote in
<telecom25.336.1@telecom-digest.org>:

> Loethen said if Spamhaus ignores the ruling "we will seek alternate
> means of enforcing the judgment through the court system in the
> U.S. and potentially the U.K."

> "Spamhaus is thumbing its nose at the U.S. courts by failing to
> participate in the process, failing to provide information in the
> court case, and failing to comply with the orders of the court,"
> Loethen said.

The views of Spamhaus can be found at
http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=1

with this gem as last paragraph:

"A TRO, and indeed any ruling whatsoever issued by a United States
County, State or Federal Court has no validity in the United Kingdom
unless jurisdiction is proven to a British Court. Therefore Spamhaus
correctly ignored the TRO and advises Mr. Linhardt to re-file his case
in a British court when he can prove jurisdiction, but advises
Mr. Linhardt that British courts do not accept US-style 'SLAPP' suits
and impose penalties for lying to the court."

koos@kzdoos.xs4all.nl    or RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5                       -?)
Fax +31-30-2817051        Camp Wireless, wireless Internet access     /\\
http://idefix.net/~koos/  at campsites http://www.camp-wireless.org/ _\_V

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #338
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep 19 15:36:03 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 7C36A2254; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #339
Message-Id: <20060919193603.7C36A2254@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:38:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 339

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    AOL Gains More New Customers After Going Free (Reuters News Wire)
    The Rise of Baidu (That's Chinese for Google) (David Barboza, NY Times)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 19, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Avaya D6200 Series Phone (kevin.gordon@gmail.com)
    Wireless Auction Brings in Record $13.9B (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: How to Spam Cell Phones (harold@hallikainen.com)
    Re: How to Spam Cell Phones (Joshua Putnam)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:21:03 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: AOL Gains More New Customers After Going Free


Time Warner Inc. on Tuesday said a strategy to offer most of online
unit AOL's services for free was making faster-than-expected progress
in attracting new Internet users and cutting costs.

Jeffrey Bewkes, Time Warner's chief operating officer, told investors
at a Goldman Sachs media conference that its strategy had attracted
new users beyond those who were once paying customers of the online
service.

Some 40 percent of new users were not former subscribers, Bewkes said.
"That means there is demand for AOL beyond the existing base," he
said.

In addition, subscribers who formerly paid for AOL services were
moving to its free services at a quicker rate than originally
predicted by AOL management, Bewkes said.

Bewkes said advertising sales at AOL were "very robust," without
elaborating.

Advertising growth would be unlikely to offset a drop in subscription
revenue for another year or two but is a more profitable source of
revenue, he said.

In August, AOL said it aimed to boost its online advertising sales by
attracting more users to its services including e-mail, instant
messaging and online video by offering most of its services at no
charge.

It continues to maintain a dial-up Internet access business, but it no
longer plans to market the service.

AOL, once the reigning king of online services, had lost millions of
paying subscribers over the last few years as subscribers defected to
providers that offered faster speeds.

"People weren't leaving AOL because they didn't like it; they were
leaving because they wanted to go to (high-speed) broadband," Bewkes
said.

By offering it for free, former subscribers who had already
relinquished their e-mail accounts are offered an opportunity to come
back and reclaim old e-mail addresses.

Time Warner shares were up 27 cents, or 1.58 percent, to $17.40 on the
New York Stock Exchange in afternoon trading.


Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:26:42 -0500
From: David Barboza <nytimes@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: The Rise of Baidu (That's Chinese for Google)


The Rise of Baidu (That's Chinese for Google)
By DAVID BARBOZA
BEIJING

IN the summer of 1998 at a picnic in Silicon Valley, Eric Xu, a
34-year-old biochemist, introduced his shy, reserved friend Robin Li
to John Wu, then the head of Yahoo's search engine team.

Mr. Li, 30 at the time, was a frustrated staff engineer at Infoseek, an 
Internet search engine partly owned by Disney, a company whose fading 
commitment to Infoseek did not mesh with Mr. Li's ongoing passion for 
search. Like Disney, Mr. Wu and Yahoo were also losing interest in the 
business prospects of search, and Yahoo 'in a colossal corporate 
blunder' eventually outsourced all of its search functions to a little 
startup named Google.

Mr. Xu, who had called together some friends for a documentary he was
making on Silicon Valley, thought the two search guys would hit it
off.  Mr. Wu says he exchanged greetings with Robin Li, but what most
impressed him was that despite all of the pessimism surrounding
search, Mr. Li remained undaunted.

"The people at Yahoo didn't think search was all that important, and so 
neither did I," says Mr. Wu, who is now the chief technology officer at 
the Chinese Internet company Alibaba.com. "But Robin, he seemed very 
determined to stick with it. And you have to admire what he accomplished."

Indeed. A year after the picnic, in 1999, Mr. Li founded his own search 
company in China, naming it Baidu (pronounced 'by-DOO'). Today, Baidu 
has a market value of $3 billion and operates the fourth-most trafficked 
Web site in the world. And Baidu is doing what no other Internet company 
has been able to do: clobbering Google and Yahoo in its home market.

While Baidu continues to gain market share in China 'and does so with a 
Web site that the Chinese government heavily censors and that gives 
priority to advertising rather than relevant search results' some 
analysts question whether Baidu can withstand competition from Google 
and Yahoo, which possess superior technology and global work forces.

But Baidu's evolution, and Mr. Li's journey as an entrepreneur, offer 
textbook examples of the payoffs and perils of doing business in China 
and suggest that Baidu may prove to be far more resilient than some 
analysts believe. China has a population of 1.3 billion, about 130 
million of whom are Internet users, an online market second in size only 
to the American market. Because China is the world's fastest-growing 
major economy, analysts consider it the next great Internet 
battleground, with Baidu uniquely positioned to prosper from that 
competition.

In exchange for letting censors oversee its Web site, Baidu has sealed
its dominance with support from the Chinese government, which
regularly blocks Google here and imposes strict rules and censorship
on other foreign Internet companies.

In addition, analysts say, entrepreneurs in China have a knack for 
pummeling American Internet giants. "The globally dominant U.S. Internet 
companies have failed to take the No. 1 market share position in any 
category," says Jason D. Brueschke, a Citigroup analyst, of the Chinese 
market. "And they came with more money and major brand names. And so 
there's something fundamentally different about this market."

So fundamentally different, Mr. Brueschke believes, that Baidu will 
retain its hammerlock on the Chinese search industry. "The real battle 
in the competitive landscape is not about who's No. 1, it's about who's 
going to be No. 2," he says.

Google, of course, will have none of this, stressing the independence of 
its search results and the international reach it offers users. "People 
want information and they want global information," says Kaifu Lee, the 
president of Google in China. "We can't be bought."

But Mr. Li says Baidu's model is working supremely well and that the 
company has built a loyal base of users who value its search 
capabilities. "At the end of the day, if a user finds relevant 
information, they'll come back," he says.

ON its corporate Web site, Baidu says that it takes its name from a Song 
Dynasty poem written several centuries ago that "compares the search for 
a retreating beauty amid chaotic glamour with the search for one's dream 
while confronted by life's many obstacles."

Mr. Li, born Li Yanhong in 1968 in what was then an impoverished city 
200 miles southwest of Beijing, is familiar with life's obstacles. The 
fourth of five children, he grew up during China's brutal Cultural 
Revolution. Despite the oppression that surrounded him, he said he was 
always able to focus on stamp collecting, performing traditional opera 
and other interests, including, eventually, computers. He was bright 
enough to get into the country's most prestigious school, Beijing 
University, where he majored in library science and dabbled in computer 
science.

The government infamously cracked down on pro-democracy demonstrations
in Tiananmen Square in 1989 when Mr. Li was a sophomore, causing his
college campus to be shut down. Mr. Li is mum on the events that
followed, saying only that he was apolitical. But he does say that a
year later he started thinking of studying abroad and that by the time
he graduated in 1991 he was ready to leave his homeland.

"China was a depressing place," he says. "I thought there was no hope."

He applied to the top three graduate programs in computer science in 
America, but did not get into any of them (perhaps, he says, because 
China was considered an also-ran in technology). "I blindly sent out 20 
applications," he says. "SUNY Buffalo was the only program willing to 
give me a fellowship."

He enrolled at Buffalo planning to earn a Ph.D. in computer science but 
grew disillusioned with academia. He completed his master's degree in 
1994 and then joined a New Jersey division of Dow Jones & Company, where 
he helped develop a software program for The Wall Street Journal's 
online edition. During that time, he also became enamored of the 
technology boom taking shape in Silicon Valley. He spent much of his 
time trying to solve one of the Internet industry’s earliest problems: 
sorting information.

A breakthrough came in 1996, he says, when he developed a search 
mechanism he called 'link analysis', which involved ranking the 
popularity of a Web site based on how many other Web sites had linked to it.

"The moment I created this thing I was very excited," he says. "I told 
my boss and pushed him. But he wasn't very excited." Soon after, he 
attended a computer conference in Silicon Valley and set up his own 
booth to demonstrate his search findings.

William I. Chang, then the chief technology officer at Infoseek, met
Mr.  Li at the conference and recruited him to oversee search engine
development.

"Robin is possibly the single most brilliant and focused person I know," 
Mr. Chang says. "And his inventions, now widely adopted, are still the 
gold standards in Web search relevance."

After Disney acquired the small fraction of Infoseek stock it did not 
already own in 1999, it shifted the company's focus away from search and 
toward content, leading Mr. Li to form his own Internet company with 
Eric Xu, who had a Ph.D. in biochemistry and good contacts in Silicon 
Valley.

The partners raised $1.2 million from two Silicon Valley venture
capital firms, Integrity Partners and Peninsula Capital, and with
their seed money in hand flew to China and founded Baidu in a hotel
room overlooking Beijing University's campus. Nine months later, in
September 2000, two other venture capital firms, Draper Fisher
Jurvetson and IDG Technology Venture, pumped another $10 million into
the startup.

So it was that on the eve of the Internet bubble bursting in the
United States, Baidu took off in China.

"When I came back I was prepared for a rough life," Mr. Li says. "It 
turns out it wasn't so bad."

Baidu started out offering search services to other Chinese portals
before developing its own stand-alone search engine. Some members of
Baidu's board of directors opposed the shift, saying it would turn
customers into competitors. But Mr. Li said he sensed a shift in the
market after watching the success of Overture, a company in Pasadena,
Calif., that sold advertising space correlated with search results
(which meant, for example, that ads for dental clinics might pop up
next to search results for cavities).

"We were skeptical about search," says Scott Walchek, a partner at 
Integrity Partners and a member of Baidu's board. "But we weren't as 
smart as Robin. Robin said he had a unique opportunity to build a brand 
around search. And he was right."

In September 2001, Baidu began its own site http://Baidu.com  which looked 
almost exactly like Google's no-frills home page. And even before Google 
did it, Baidu allowed advertisers to bid for ad space and then pay Baidu 
every time a customer clicked on an ad. Small and medium-size companies 
loved it, the site became deluged with traffic and Baidu turned a profit 
in 2004. By then, Mr. Li was pushing for an initial public offering in 
the United States, insisting it would be a huge branding event for a 
company that had come to be called "China's Google."

BAIDU went public on Aug. 5, 2005, at $27 a share. When trading ended 
that day, shares of Baidu closed at $122, up 354 percent, the biggest 
opening on Nasdaq since the dot-com peak in 2000. Suddenly, Baidu was a 
$4 billion company and Mr. Li held stock worth more than $900 million. 
But not everyone cheered. Many analysts said that by almost every 
measure Baidu’s stock was ridiculously over-valued. It eventually 
tumbled to as low as $44 before rebounding. On Friday, its shares closed 
up $3.03 in regular trading, to $87.75, giving the company a market 
capitalization of about $2.94 billion.

At the time of the I.P.O., some critics attacked Baidu's zealousness for 
ad revenues. They noted, for example, that a Baidu search for the word 
'cancer' turned up ads for hospitals that paid for top spots in results 
rather than returning information on cancer itself. In comparison, 
Google and Yahoo more clearly separate ads from relevant search results 
by placing them on the right side of the page.

The company's revenue jumped 190 percent in the first half of this year, 
to $40.9 million; profit soared 550 percent, to $11.7 million. Baidu's 
Web site is drawing millions of young people eager to download music 
files, create blogs or search for pictures of China's '10 Most Beautiful 
Women.' While Baidu is growing fast, its revenue is still anemic 
compared with Google's, which is expected to top $7 billion this year.

Analysts say Baidu is playing to a different audience than Western
Internet companies because the Chinese are far more interested in
entertainment than news, books or car rental rates. "The fact is 70
percent of China's Internet users are under the age of 30," says
Richard Ji, an analyst with Morgan Stanley. "Most of them are
single, only children. They're looking for entertainment."

That may explain why China's dominant Internet companies are all
entertainment focused, like Tencent (which hosts online communities
and instant messaging) and Netease and Shanda (which are online gaming
sites).

Yet no Internet company in China is growing as fast as Baidu, which
had more than 50 percent of the pay-per-click market in the first half
of year, up from a 37 percent share in the same period a year ago,
and according to Analysys, a research firm in Beijing. Google and Yahoo
both lost ground, with each company holding 16 percent pay-per-click
shares for the first six months of 2006.

Still, Baidu faces significant challenges. The company’s stock is
in the stratosphere, putting pressure on management to deliver
knockout growth every quarter. Google’s shares closed up $5.90
Friday in regular trading, to $409.88, meaning investors pay a hefty
$60 for every $1 of profit in the stock, far more than other Internet
companies. But Baidu investors pay a whopping $190 for every $1 of
profit.

Baidu also faces legal challenges, including lawsuits claiming it
violates copyright laws on music files. Baidu has been sued over the
issue, but continues to provide links to sites that offer music files.
The company says it does not believe it should be held responsible for
simply offering linking to other sites. In a country rampant with
claims of click fraud, a Beijing hospital recently claimed that Baidu
orchestrated a scheme in which a Baidu affiliate kept clicking on the
hospital's ads to fatten the fees it had to pay Baidu. A Baidu
spokeswoman says the company has not reviewed the case, but actively
polices click fraud.

LOOMING on the horizon are Google and Yahoo. Google says it plans to
spend hundreds of millions of dollars to compete in China, and Yahoo
has merged its operations here with Chinese Internet behemoth
Alibaba.com.

"Google is fierce," Morgan Stanley's Mr. Ji says. "And Alibaba has the 
best sales force. Baidu could get hurt on the technical side."

But the Chinese market is littered with the wreckage of American 
Internet companies that have failed to dominate here. In 2003, eBay 
bought the largest Chinese auction company and then lost market share. 
In 2004, Amazon bought the largest Chinese online merchandiser and 
then lost market share.

Now, the real fight begins. Google, which invested $5 million in Baidu
just before its public offering last year, sold that stake for a hefty
$60 million in June. And now, Google is building up a huge research
team in Beijing, not far from Baidu's headquarters. But analysts say
it won't be easy for Google.

"The American Internet giants are dominant in the U.S. and dominant in 
Europe," Mr. Brueschke at Citigroup says. "And then they come to China 
and fail. And so what I want to know is: What is Google going to do 
differently?"

For his part, Robin Li seems undaunted.

"Our traffic keeps increasing," he says confidently. "We're now the No. 
1 Web site in China."

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day from New York Times, Christian
Science Monitor and National Public Radio, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nytimes.html

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 19, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:03:01 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 19, 2006
********************************

Laying the groundwork for change: Managing organisational change
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19963?11228

     Organisational culture, often simplistically referred to as "the
     way things are done," is in fact a complex concept. At the core
     of the culture lie implicit and explicit perceptions and priorities
     that influence both overt and covert behavior. Core cultural
     components are, for example, the way individuals communicate, what
     is ...

FCC AWS Auction Ends at US$13.9 bil.
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19962?11228

     The auction of 1,122 licences for spectrum in the 1710-1755 MHz
     and 2110-2155 MHz bands for the operation of both fixed and
     mobile services has now closed. Beginning on 10 August, the
     auction raised a total of US$13.9 billion-US$13.7 billion after
     discounts -- just shy of the hoped-for US$15.0 billion. With the
     Federal Communications...

BCE Spins Off Telesat with IPO
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19960?11228

     Bell Canada Enterprises (BCE) today announced that it is to spin
     off satellite unit Telesat in an IPO of non-voting stock in
     Canada and the United States. A preliminary prospectus and a
     registration statement have been filed with the Canadian
     Securities Administrators filing system (SEDAR) and the
     U.S. Federal Communications Commission....

Motorola to Buy Symbol Technologies for $3.9 Billion
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19954?11228

     CHICAGO -- Motorola Inc. said Tuesday it will acquire Symbol
     Technologies Inc. for about $3.9 billion (E3.08 billion) in a
     deal that expands the world's second-largest cellphone
     maker's presence in the market for business-oriented mobile
     devices.  The deal for Symbol, which makes portable bar-code
     scanners and customized ...

Emap to Provide Content for BT's New Internet-based TV Service
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19951?11228

     LONDON -- Magazine and radio group Emap PLC signed a deal Tuesday
     to provide music programs for a new Internet-based TV service from BT
     Group PLC. BT said that the agreement offers it access to a range
     of music channels built around Emap's print, radio and press
     brands including the magazines Q, Kerrang!, FHM and Smash Hits,...

Is It Back To The Drawing Board For Pending Telecom Reform?
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19948?11228

     The number of senators doubting the passage of telecom legislation
     this session continues to grow. We only have three
     weeks, said Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.), featured this past
     weekend on C-SPAN's "The Communicators" show (which
     will encore tonight at 8 p.m. on C-SPAN 2.) Noting that some
     lawmakers are ...

Freescale's Silicon Sell-Off
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19945?11228

     On a big day for bidding wars in the wireless sector, chipmaker
     Freescale Semiconductor Inc. could be at the center of one
     right now, according to a research note from UBS AG . Motorola
     spinoff Freescale has already agreed to a deal that would see it
     bought by The Blackstone Group for $17.6 billion. UBS, however,
     notes that the ...

Base Station Sales Will Remain Strong but Decline Looms After 2008
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19938?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- September 18, 2006 - Revenue from sales
     of cellular base stations will remain strong through 2008, reports
     In-Stat. But, by 2009, base station revenue will begin a steep
     decline.  Spending on cellular base stations by cellular
     service providers these last few years has been untypical, as
     spending on ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: kevin.gordon@gmail.com
Subject: Avaya D6200 Series Phone
Date: 18 Sep 2006 22:38:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hey There,

I recently bought a D6208+ Avaya VoIP phone off of EBay. The previous
owner of the phone had set a programming password on the phone itself.
Without having to SNMP into the phone how can I reset the admin
password? Is there a default one? The only option I have available in
my Menu Function Key is for Directory. The last owner must have locked
out the other features.

I'm tinkering with the phone to setup a small VoIP network for
educational purposes (I'm majoring in E-Business in College).

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to reset the phone ?

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:33:22 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead " <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Wireless Auction Brings in Record $13.9B


USTelecom dailyLead
September 19, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/evxofDtusXcOcebVzj

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Wireless auction brings in record $13.9B
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Microsoft launches Web-video service
* Motorola buys Symbol
* Report: Mobile VoIP revenues to top fixed VoIP's by 2012
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Deploying a Converged IP Network Thursday, Sept. 21, 1:00 p.m. (ET)
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Report: Worldwide DSL use surges
* Conference calling on the rise as companies seek to trim costs
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* DHS names technology lobbyist to cybersecurity post
DIVERSIONS
* Broadway Weighs Plan to Reward Frequent Theatergoers
* BlackBerry Adds Diversions, Counting on Sales
* A Pinch of Retro Spices Up Fiat's Classic Italian Recipe
* A College Savings Plan With One Less Worry
* Footsteps: Wallace Stegner's Mexico

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/evxofDtusXcOcebVzj

------------------------------

From: harold@hallikainen.com <harold@hallikainen.com>
Subject: Re: How to Spam Cell Phones
Date: 19 Sep 2006 05:35:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted:
 
> that stuff go nowhere. The big thing now, it seems, is to send members
> of E-Bay's community 'partial' letters of complaint, with a link
> address to click on to respond. The partial letter says something like
> "That gizmo you sold me; when are you going to deliver it?" and the
> partial letter always goes on to say "E-Bay takes this complaint very
> seriously. Please respond direct to this member if you wish to retain
> your good standing with E-Bay."  etcetera.  How big a thing is 'big
> thing'?  Oh, I get anywhere from 50 to 75 of them each time I log on
> here. I finally relented and answered just one of them the other day;
> I used the 'f-word' in every form I could think of using it; as a
> verb, a noun, a preposition, an adjective, an adverb, you name it. And
> I did not bother to sign it. I sent my reply as an independent
> email to the site named prior to the cgi-bin which included ebay in
> the end of it. I did not get a futher reply from the goofus who sent
> it out to me, but I did conclude by telling him I hoped he felt my
> 'customer service' had been good. Those people are really beginning to
> make me get very angry.   PAT]

I get those too, along with lots of stock pump and dump image spam. On
the ebay stuff, I don't think it's sent by ebay members. Instead, it's
just a phishing attack. They use ebay since it's so popular, and it's
more likely someone is to have an account there than at some
particular bank. I just send ALL spam that gets past my spamcop
blacklist and spam assassin filters to spamcop.net . It automatically
generates complaints to the appropriate isps (those where the email
originated and those hosting referenced sites) and adds the
originating email server to the blacklist, which then causes MTAs to
reject future emails during the connection phase.

Harold

------------------------------

From: Joshua Putnam <josh@phred.org>
Subject: Re: How to Spam Cell Phones
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:00:56 -0700


TELECOM Digest Editor's Note:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well, I can tell you this much: if it
> is something E-Bay is selling, I would generally stay away from it.
> That is, unless you want even more spam as a result. I have purchased
> _ONE_ item via E-Bay in my lifetime, a cellular phone which was not
> all that great, and I have been spammed ever since. 

> The big thing now, it seems, is to send members
> of E-Bay's community 'partial' letters of complaint, with a link
> address to click on to respond. The partial letter says something like
> "That gizmo you sold me; when are you going to deliver it?" and the
> partial letter always goes on to say "E-Bay takes this complaint very
> seriously. Please respond direct to this member if you wish to retain
> your good standing with E-Bay."  etcetera. 

For what it's worth, I get those eBay-related spams in equal volume at
email addresses that have never been used for eBay as I do at the one
address that's eBay-registered.  I suspect the spammers just send them
to everyone, figuring enough people do use eBay that they might as
well try.  Same reason I get spoofs claiming to be banks I've never
heard of or insurance companies in foreign countries.  It's easier to
spam everyone than to target the attack.

josh@phred.org is Joshua Putnam
http://www.phred.org/~josh/
Braze your own bicycle frames.  See
http://www.phred.org/~josh/build/build.html


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But, to Josh and Harold, what I said in
my earlier note was that I _agree_ with both of you and with e-Bay.
That company is not the source of the spam (except for their
carelessness in leaving their customer list open for people to look
at) and that the cheap, shoddy spam being sent out; but where most
such establishments (including their own PayPal  unit) reserve the
email address 'spoof@' as a way to quickly cut-and-paste up that
offensive crapola to send to their investigators, E-Bay does not
even do that much. They use 'spam@ebay.com' for some other purpose
entirely.  At least PayPal makes an effort to confront those fools
and close them down. PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #339
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Sep 21 00:37:08 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id DFAE6224F; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:37:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #340
Message-Id: <20060921043707.DFAE6224F@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:37:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:35:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 340

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    FCC Says Boston Airport Authorities Cannot Stop Broadband (Jeremy Pelofsky)
    Firefox Now Allows Anonymous Web Surfing (Jeremy Kirk, IDG)
    When Public and Private Collide (BBC News Wire)
    BellSouth Inks Deals to Market Triple-Play (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 20, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Needing to Make Contact With Lisa Hancock  (TELECOM Digest Editor)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:01:22 -0500
From: Jeremy Pelofsky <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: FCC Says Boston Airport Authorities Cannot Stop Airline's Broadband


FCC seen backing airline's broadband at Logan 
By Jeremy Pelofsky

Boston airport authorities cannot stop Continental Airlines from
offering wireless Internet service in its frequent flier lounge under
a proposed Federal Communications Commission ruling, sources familiar
with the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

The Massachusetts Port Authority, or Massport, instructed airlines in
2005 to unplug their wireless and wireline high-speed Internet access
in frequent flier lounges at Boston-Logan International Airport and
use the fee-based system the airport was launching.

Continental petitioned the FCC to keep its free service running and
was later supported by wireless service providers, other airlines and
package delivery service United Parcel Service.

Massport contends the rival services would interfere with its network
offered at Logan, raise safety concerns, and violate lease agreements.

But FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has proposed backing Continental's
request, said the sources, who include telecommunications lawyers.

The proposed ruling favoring Continental has been sent to the four
other FCC commissioners for a vote, the sources said. Martin would
have to win the support of at least two commissioners for it to pass.

An FCC spokeswoman declined to comment. Massport officials were not
immediately available for comment.

"We are optimistic that the FCC will confirm Continental's right,
consistent with the agency's existing rules, to continue providing
free Wi-Fi service to Continental customers at Logan and other
airports," said Continental spokesman Dave Messing.

If Continental wins, the FCC ruling could serve as a precedent for
other airlines and Internet service providers to offer airport
Internet access, often sought by business travelers.

Wireless communications provider T-Mobile USA withdrew its service
from American Airlines' lounge at Boston airport as a result of the
Massport demand.

Continental offers the Internet access to members of its frequent
flier club for free and told the FCC that the cost for using the
Massport system was "unknown and potentially higher than what it costs
Continental to operate its own antenna."

The airlines and wireless providers cited the FCC's Over-the-Air
Reception Devices regulations as the justification for allowing them
to offer the Wi-Fi service.

Massport countered that those regulations do not authorize
Continental's service. It told the FCC that the airline's system has
already caused interference with other users at the airport.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:04:58 -0500
From: Jeremy Kirk, IDG News <idg@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Firefox Now Allows Anonymous Web Surfing


Tweaked Firefox Lets You Surf Internet Without a Trace 
Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service

A tweaked version of Firefox that makes Web browsing anonymous has
been released by a group of privacy-minded coders.

Every few minutes, the Torpark browser causes a computer's IP address
to appear to change. IP addresses are numeric identifier given to
computers on the Internet. The number can be used along with other
data to potentially track down a user, as many Web sites keep track of
IP addresses.

Hackers Promote Privacy

Torpark's creators, a group of computer security gurus and privacy
experts named Hactivismo, said they want to expand privacy rights on
the Internet as new technologies increasingly collect online data.

The browser is free to download at torpark.nfshost.com. It's a
modified version of Portable Firefox, an optimized version of the
browser that can be run off a USB memory stick on a computer.

The Torpark browser uses encryption to send data over The Onion
Router, a worldwide network of servers nicknamed "Tor" set up to
transfer data to one another in a random, obscure fashion.

Internet traffic, such as Web site requests, carries information on
where it came from and where it's going. But that's muddled using Tor,
which has been endorsed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and is
hard to trace back to a source.

Encryption Still Important

One minor downside is that surfing with Torpark is slower than with a
typical browser over the same connection.

Torpark cautions that data sent from the last Tor server to the Web
site is encrypted. Since only the user's connection is anonymous,
Torpark advises that sensitive data such as username and passwords
should only be used when the browser displays a golden padlock, a sign
that a Web site is using encryption.

Torpark's user interface appears similar to Firefox with a few
changes.  It shows the current IP address that would be seen by Web
sites in the lower right hand corner, and features a special "Flush
Tor" button to reset a new, random server connection.

A test of Torpark using a computer in London employed IP addresses of
servers registered in Berlin and Madison, Wisconsin.

Copyright 2006 PC World Communications, Inc.

For more news and headlines please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:50:30 -0500
From: Bill Thompson, BBC  <bbc@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: When Public and Private Collide


By Bill Thompson, BBC World Service News
 
There is a growing need to develop technologies that help us tackle the 
problem of trust online, says regular commentator Bill Thompson.

Most of the discussions about Craigslist, the phenomenally successful
classified ad website that started over 10 years ago in the US, A
concentrate on the job ads and accommodation listings and how they are
challenging existing advertisers.

But the site is also used extensively for personal ads of all sorts, 
including many from people looking for sex with no complications.

The ads, some of them very explicit, can be found in the "casual
encounters" area of the personals section, behind a warning notice
designed to deter children or the easily offended.

Hide and seek

In early September Jason Fortuny, a web designer and network
administrator from Seattle, took an apparently real ad from one
Craigslist site and posted it in the Seattle "casual encounters"
section. The advert was from a woman looking for a man.

Within a day he had 178 responses, many with photos. At which point he
posted them all onto a public website, complete with the photos,
e-mail and IM addresses and even mobile phone numbers.

He has since asked people to help him identify those respondents who
were more cautious about revealing themselves in their e-mails,
presumably so he can humiliate them further online.

In the end the question is one of trust, and of understanding what
levels of trust are appropriate in different areas of our lives, on
and offline.

Some of the men who contacted Fortuny were married. Some used their
work e-mail addresses or attached nude photos of themselves. Many of
them said things that they would not want friends, family, co-workers
or even casual acquaintances to know, and all of that information is
now available on a public, and widely publicised, website.

Fortuny calls his exploit "The Craigslist Experiment", but of course
it is not an "experiment" at all since it has long been clear to
anyone who cares to think about it that few net users have any real
understanding of the degree to which they expose themselves when they
go online.

Privacy row

The recent furore over AOL's ill-considered release of the search
terms entered by its customers, and the ease with which people could
be tracked down just by what they were looking for, showed this
clearly.

All Fortuny has done is show how far things can go, and in the process
he has probably ruined the lives of dozens of people.

Some of them will probably sue him, since although the US has no real
privacy law "publication of non-newsworthy, private facts about an
individual that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person" is
grounds for legal action. Some may be planning more direct action
against him.

Wired News blogger Ryan Singel has called him "sociopathic", and
although some of those commenting on Fortuny's blog think what he has
done is "cool" in some way, the general feeling is that he has gone
too far.

I agree. He has acted in a despicable manner, and deserves whatever
legal action is coming his way. He also deserves to be ostracised by
the online communities he was so clearly seeking to impress.  We
didn't need to know about his experiment to understand that the net
creates new possibilities for public exposure. And we certainly don't
need to give Fortuny credit for his cheap trick.

After all, this was the week in which Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg
apologised publicly for messing with his users' privacy and getting it
wrong at the massively popular social networking site he created.

The problems arose when a recent site overhaul introduced a "news
feed" feature which instantly notified users when anything changed in
their contacts' profiles, including when they made new friends, joined
or left groups or changed relationship status.

The user community, mostly US college students, didn't like this at
all since while all the information that was visible in the feed had
been available to anyone who cared to look for it, bringing it into
one place left them feeling exposed.

As a result of the protests Facebook has made some changes, giving
users more control over what information other people can see in their
feeds, and this may be enough to defuse the criticism.

And the incident has done a lot more to raise general awareness of
online privacy, at far less cost, than Fortuny's exploits.

Life lesson

Privacy breaches occur all the time, of course. Sometimes it is
malice, sometimes it is poor decision making, and sometimes it's
incompetence.

Over the weekend Linden Lab, creators of the popular and increasingly
hip virtual world Second Life, revealed that its account database had
been compromised and details of more than 600,000 accounts were
exposed.

Account names, real names and contact details, but not credit card
information, were all visible.

And the net's not the only place where personal details can leak out.

The board of Hewlett-Packard is still coping with the revelation that
old-fashioned surveillance methods were used by chairwoman Patricia
Dunn, who used private investigators to get phone records for her
fellow board members and a number of journalists after details of
internal discussions appeared in the press.

In the end the question is one of trust, and of understanding what
levels of trust are appropriate in different areas of our lives, on
and offline. Sadly, however, the answer seems to be that anyone using
the network should trust no one.

An e-mail sent to a girlfriend or boyfriend may be circulated widely
if the relationship breaks up; a seemingly trustworthy company may
have bad internal practices and expose you to identity theft; the
person you think you're chatting to on IM could be an impostor or even
your colleague's young child -- ask my friend Simon about this one.
But we cannot live in such a world and we should not have to. As
society developed from small groups where everyone was known to
everyone else we found new ways to make connections and establish
appropriate levels of trust.

We'll need to work hard, and fast, to find ways to make online
contacts work too. Otherwise we'll fall for scam after scam and expose
ourselves to humiliation or blackmail again and again.

And we'll fall for the oldest tricks in the book, like those who
wanted to believe in YouTube icon Lonelygirl15, who claimed to be a
precociously astute home-schooled sixteen year-old in her posted
videos and turns out to be an "art project" with links to Hollywood.

While the deceit may get someone a production deal or a show on an
obscure cable channel, it shows yet again that you simply can't
believe what you read or see online without some real evidence.

Bill Thompson is a regular commentator on the BBC World Service 
programme Digital Planet

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/5335054.stm

Copyright 2006 BBC 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/BBC.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:48:52 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: BellSouth Inks Deals to Market Triple-Play


USTelecom dailyLead
September 20, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ewgUfDtusXcQAWixNX

TODAY'S HEADLINES
NEWS OF THE DAY

* BellSouth inks deals to market triple-play services
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* DirecTV mulls broadband investment
* AT&T to provide broadband network to Kansas school district, signs MPLS d=
eal with Sur La Table
* YouTube gets cash, credibility from Cingular deal
* Disney says iTunes movie sales reach $1M in first week
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Deploying a Converged IP Network Tomorrow, Sept. 21, 1:00 p.m. (ET)
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Iowa telecoms eye triple play for rural customers
* Skype-compatible products let users roam freely
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Tech manufacturers taking stand against Net neutrality
* AG urges tougher data-retention laws for ISPs
* Auction over, spectrum use on industry's mind
DIVERSIONS
* A Spork With an Added Edge
* A Journey Through Forests and a Sense of Regret
* Life Is Better; It Isn't Better. Which Is It?
* A Chip That Can Transfer Data Using Laser Light
* A Hedge Fund's Loss Rattles Nerves

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ewgUfDtusXcQAWixNX

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 20, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:02:29 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 20, 2006
********************************

Vodafone Dials into Ericsson for HSDPA
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19987?11228

     Ericsson has confirmed that it is involved in the roll-out of
     Vodafone U.K.'s HSDPA network, Dow Jones reports. Earlier in the
     year, Vodafone had announced plans to roll-out an HSDPA network,
     but failed to name the network supplier. In a statement
     yesterday, Ericsson said it would provide HSDPA equipment and
     services for Vodafone ...

Moscow Court Again Supports VimpelCom's Far-Eastern Licence Application
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19984?11228

     Moscow's Arbitration Court has ruled that Russia's State Radio
     Frequency Commission must consider VimpelCom's application for
     frequencies in the country's Far Eastern Federal District. The
     Commission now has 14 days to consider the operator's
     application. The decision comes after VimpelCom filed a lawsuit
     in July ...

Cingular to Sponsor Online Battle of Band
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/19981?11228

     SAN FRANCISCO -- Cingular Wireless LLC has agreed to sponsor an
     online battle of the bands on YouTube Inc., providing the
     Internet's most watched video site with a cash infusion as the
     rapidly growing startup tries to prove it will be able to parlay
     its popularity into profits.  Financial terms of the deal,
     scheduled to ...

Sprint Aims for More Secure Handsets
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19977?11228

     Sprint Nextel introduced Sprint Mobile Security, a service
     designed to deliver an end-to-end security management for mobile
     handhelds, as well as laptops. Mobile Armor powers the newly
     launched service, which is targeted at enterprises.  The service
     was constructed to protect data by enforcing password policies
     across all devices ...

Gov't Lawyers Blast Telecom Bill's State Pre-Emptions
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19975?11228

     At least 41 attorneys general have told the U.S. Congress they
     'strongly oppose' provisos in pending telecom legislation that
     would, in their opinions, pre-empt states from enforcing
     consumer-protection laws applicable to wireless carriers and
     Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service providers.  In a
     seven-page letter ...

Schoolin' Endpoints
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19972?11228

     Security startup Network Chemistry Inc. has jazzed up its WiFi
     endpoint security software so its sensors can deal with more
     incidents simultaneously.  The new release of the firm's
     RFprotect Distributed system means that Network Chemistry's
     hardware sensors can now stop dozens of rogue devices from
     connecting to a user's ...

Big Guns Dominate Spectrum Auction
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/19969?11228

     Six weeks after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) began
     auctioning off a huge new batch of wireless spectrum, T-Mobile
     USA, Verizon Wireless, and a consortium of Sprint Nextel
     Corp. and leading cable operators have emerged as the biggest
     winners.  Cingular Wireless LLC and MetroPCS Inc. also scored
     highly in the ...

Despite its Critics, Muni-Wireless Broadband Systems Growing
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/19966?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- Worldwide deployments of municipal wireless
     networks for public Internet access will continue at a rapid pace
     over the next few years, with the US leading the way. The total
     worldwide market will reach 248 deployments by the end of 2006,
     and will grow to over 1,500 by the end of 2010, according to
     In-Stat ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: Looking for Lisa Hancock
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:24:31 EDT
From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor)


It is rather important I get a chance to speak ASAP with Lisa Hancock,
at the email address hancock4.  Her incoming mail to the Digest has
been acting up -- rather severely -- of late, and she apparently does
not receieve or read email at the address used to send her things to
the Digest (which is the only address I have for her). If she sees this,
I would appreciate her either writing me in email or telephoning me
about the difficulty.  Thanks.

PAT

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #340
******************************

    
    
From prvs=telecom-owner+M2789=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=0413da93e4@telecom-digest.org  Fri Sep 22 16:31:12 2006
Return-Path: <prvs=telecom-owner+M2789=ptownson=massis.lcs.mit.edu=0413da93e4@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42])
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AF6621F6
	for <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 24251 invoked by uid 85); 22 Sep 2006 20:28:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 24021 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2006 20:28:34 -0000
Received: from massis.lcs.mit.edu (128.31.0.14)
  by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2006 20:28:33 -0000
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix)
	id 4B10D220D; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:28:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 61D2721F6; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #341
Message-Id: <20060922202831.61D2721F6@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Reply-To: telecom@telecom-digest.org
List-Help: <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Unsubscribe: (Use this command to get off the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe%20telecom>
List-Subscribe: (Use this command to join the list) <mailto:telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe%20telecom>
List-Post: <mailto:telecom@telecom-digest.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-telecom@telecom-digest.org> (Contact Person for Help)
List-ID: <telecom.telecom-digest.org>
X-Loop: majordomo
Precedence: bulk
Sender: telecom-owner@telecom-digest.org
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:30:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 341

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Commerce Department Loses 1,137 Laptops (Douglass K. Daniel, AP)
    Google Loses Appeal on Posting Court Ruling (Reuters News Wire)
    Telecom Update #547, September 22, 2006 (John Riddell)
    School Teacher Sues Students Over Bogus MySpace Page (Express-News)
    Googling For ATM Master Passwords (Monty Solomon)
    Modem/Fax Keeps Timing Out (captainido@gmail.com)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update-September 21, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update-September 22, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Urgent Advisory: New Malware Attack Exploiting I.E. 6 (TerraWorld Help) 
    AOL France Sold to Neuf Cegetel (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Verizon to Offer Local Content via FiOS (USTelecom dailyLead)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:10:44 -0500
From: Douglass K. Daniel <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Commerce Department Loses 1,137 Laptops


By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL,  Associated Press Writer

The Commerce Department has lost 1,137 laptop computers since 2001, most 
of them assigned to the Census Bureau, officials said Thursday night.

The Census Bureau, the main collector of information about Americans, 
lost 672 computers. Of those, 246 contained some personal data, the 
department said in a statement. However, no personal information from 
any of the missing computers has been known to have been improperly 
used, the department said.

The number of people affected by the equipment losses could not be 
determined, the department said.

"All of the equipment that was lost or stolen contained protections to
prevent a breach of personal information," said Commerce Secretary
Carlos M. Gutierrez. "The amount of missing computers is high, but
fortunately, the vulnerability for data misuse is low."

More than 30,000 laptops were used within the department's 15 operating 
unit since 2001, the department said, and a total of 1,137 were stolen 
or missing.

Fifteen handheld devices used to record survey data for testing
processes in preparation for the 2010 Census also were lost, the
department said. The department was in the process of contacting the
558 households with data recorded on the missing devices, although
because of encryption technology, the risk of data misuse was
considered low, it said.

A half-dozen other federal agencies or departments have reported data
thefts and security breaches involving personal information in the
last six months.

The Veterans Affairs Department suffered the biggest loss with the
theft in May of a laptop and external drive containing information for
26.5 million veterans and active-duty troops. Burglars stole the
equipment from the home of a Veterans Affairs employee, but the
computer was later recovered and showed no signs of having been
accessed for the personal data.

Other government departments reporting the loss of computers with
personal information include the departments of Agriculture, Defense,
Education, Energy, Health and Human Services and Transportation. The
Federal Trade Commission also has lost laptops with sensitive data.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td_extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:16:13 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org)
Subject: Google Loses Appeal on Posting Court Ruling


Google Inc. has lost a bid to overturn a Belgian court order that 
requires it to publish an earlier ruling forbidding it from reproducing 
article snippets on its news amalgamation service.

The world's most popular Web search engine faces a daily fine of 500,000 
euros ($640,900) for not posting the September 5 decision on its Belgian 
Web site.

It said on Friday it still refuses to post the ruling.

"We are very disappointed that the court has decided to uphold its 
decision that the original judgment be posted to Google.be and 
news.google.be," a Google spokesman said.

Google had argued that the posting was unnecessary given the widespread 
publicity of the case.

It will fight the decision again as part of a broader attempt to 
overturn the entire case. The court is expected to consider the appeal 
in November.

"We believe that Google News is entirely lawful and brings real benefits 
to publishers by driving web traffic -- and users -- to their sites," 
the spokesman said.

Google News lists headlines and a few sentences of text from news 
articles around the world and links back to a publication's own Web site 
for users to read the whole item.

Any publisher can opt out by asking Google to remove its content, but 
publishers argue that by reproducing the material in the first place 
Google is violating copyright law.

Separately on Friday, four international publishing trade groups 
unveiled plans to launch an automated system for granting search engines 
and other companies permission for using their content.

The Belgian case was brought by Copiepresse, an organization that 
manages copyrights for French and German language newspapers.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each da, pleae go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #547, September 22, 2006
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:03:28 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************
TELECOM UPDATE
************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca

Number 547: September 22, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:

** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page
** BIG PIPE: www.bigpipeinc.com
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.com/canada/telecom/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

************************************************************

IN THIS ISSUE:

** VoIP E9-1-1 Plan Approved
** Consumers Object to Bell Rate Increase
** Public Speaks on Govt Telecom Policy Plan
** Search Under Way for New CRTC Chair
** Globalive Buying Yak Communications
** BCE Files Prospectus for Telesat Shares
** B.C. Islands to Get Broadband Link
** Mobile Industry Group to Fight Pollution
** Cablecos' Premium VoIP Service Not for Resale
** Some Small CLECs Excused from Equal Access
** AT&T Insources 2,000 Jobs
** Bell Aliant Bids to Expand TV Licence
** Bell to Move 2,000 Toronto Employees to Mississauga
** Ottawa Startup Acquired by Telco Systems
** 50 Years of Overseas Cable

VoIP E9-1-1 PLAN APPROVED: The CRTC has approved a recommendation from
the CISC Emergency Services Working Group that VoIP E9-1-1 in Canada be
based on the "i2" standard developed by the US-based National Emergency
Number Association. (See Telecom Update #511)

** Within six months the EWSG must submit a functional
   architecture for implementing this solution, including the
   roles and responsibilities of all emergency services
   industry participants.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-60.htm
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/cisc/es/ESRE0042.doc

CONSUMERS OBJECT TO BELL RATE INCREASE: The CRTC has so far received
nearly 1,000 emails from consumers responding to the proposal by Bell
and Bell Aliant to increase local rates by 80 cents while eliminating
connection charges for new and moving customers. Most oppose the plan.
(See Telecom Update #537, 541)

** Telus has filed a similar proposal, which would result in
   local rate increases in B.C. and Alberta of up to 5%. The
   CRTC says it will consider the Telus and Bell proposals
   together, and will issue revised timelines for PN 2006-11.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2006/8661/c12_200610057.htm#4b
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/8740/2006/t42/666886.zip

** A national survey commissioned by the Public Interest
   Advocacy Centre in September found that about 2/3 of
   residential customers believe connection charges should be
   paid by the person moving, not spread across all customers.

PUBLIC SPEAKS ON GOVT TELECOM POLICY PLAN: Over 50 organizations and
individuals have submitted comments on Ottawa's proposal to direct the
CRTC to "rely on market forces to the maximum extent feasible and
regulate ... in a manner that interferes with market forces to the
minimum extent necessary." (See Telecom Update #534)

** The submissions are posted on the Web at
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/en/sf08689e.html

SEARCH UNDER WAY FOR NEW CRTC CHAIR: Speculation is growing about
possible replacements for CRTC Chair Charles Dalfen, whose term expires
at the end of 2006. Frequently mentioned candidates include telecom
lawyer Hank Intven, ex-CBC president Perrin Beatty, CRTC Vice-Chair
Richard French, former CRTC Vice-Chair Fernand Belisle, and Alain Gourd.

GLOBALIVE BUYING YAK COMMUNICATIONS: The directors of Yak Communications
have approved Toronto-based Globalive Communications' bid to purchase
the company for US$67.7 million. The deal requires shareholder and
regulatory approval.

** Yak reports a net loss of US$365,000 for the year ended
   June 30, compared to a $4.8 million profit the previous
   year. Revenue was unchanged at $92.4 million.

BCE FILES PROSPECTUS FOR TELESAT SHARES: BCE has filed documents
required to offer US$400 million worth of non-voting stock in Telesat.
BCE would retain 100% voting control. (See Telecom Update #544)

B.C. ISLANDS TO GET BROADBAND LINK: Telus has signed a contract with the
Gwaii Trust Society to build "the world's longest over-water radio
Internet transmission" link from Prince Rupert to Haida Gwaii (the Queen
Charlotte Islands). The 115-kilometer link is part of a Telus-B.C.
government project to bring high-speed Internet to 119 rural and remote
communities.

MOBILE INDUSTRY GROUP TO FIGHT POLLUTION: European cellphone makers and
carriers have formed a group to improve the environmental performance of
mobile phones and to encourage phone recycling. The group includes
Nokia, Motorola, Panasonic, France Telecom/Orange, Vodafone, TeliaSonera
AB, Intel, Epson, Spansion, and Umicore.

CABLECOS' PREMIUM VoIP SERVICE NOT FOR RESALE: Denying an application
by Cybersurf, the CRTC says that cablecos do not have to provide
competitors with wholesale access to their managed VoIP telephony
service. (See Telecom Update #509)

** The Commission also ruled that Shaw Communications does
   not have to allow competitors to resell its "Quality of
   Service Enhancement," as there is no evidence that the QSE=
   service gives Shaw's traffic any preference.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-61.htm

SOME SMALL CLECs EXCUSED FROM EQUAL ACCESS: CRTC Telecom Decision
2006-58 says CLECs that offer local VoIP services through a reseller
and that have fewer than 10,000 telephone subscribers do not have to
provide equal access to long distance carriers. However, they must
comply with all other CLEC obligations. (See Telecom Update #497)

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/dt2006-58.htm

AT&T INSOURCES 2,000 JOBS: Bucking a major trend in telecom, AT&T Inc.
says that about 2,000 previously outsourced jobs will be brought
in-house by the end of 2008. The jobs provide technical support to
AT&T DSL customers.

BELL ALIANT BIDS TO EXPAND TV LICENCE: Bell Aliant has asked the CRTC
to expand its broadcasting distribution licence to include Fredericton
and the surrounding area. Deadline for comments: October 24.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Notices/2006/pb2006-121.htm

BELL TO MOVE 2,000 TORONTO EMPLOYEES TO MISSISSAUGA: Bell Canada plans
to move 2,000 of its 12,000 Toronto employees to Mississauga by the
end of 2008. The Mississauga facility, with 7,000 employees, will then
be Bell's largest.

OTTAWA STARTUP ACQUIRED BY TELCO SYSTEMS: Critical Telecom, an
Ottawa-based startup that manufactures ADSL2+ equipment for carriers,
has been acquired by Telco Systems, a U.S. subsidiary of Israeli data
networking developer BATM Advanced Communications. Terms of the
acquisition were not announced.

50 YEARS OF OVERSEAS CABLE: 50 years ago, on September 25, 1956, the
first transatlantic telephone cable went live. The 2,000-mile link
between Scotland and Newfoundland was a joint project between AT&T
(50%), the British Post Office (40%), and the Canadian Overseas
Telecommunications Corporation (10%). COTC was later privatized and
renamed Teleglobe.

** Before TAT1 was installed, overseas calls were carried by
   radio: it often took hours to set up a call, and sound
   quality was unreliable. The new cable could handle 36
   simultaneous calls with much improved sound quality. Call
   setup, which still required operator assistance, took
   about 10 minutes.

** The new cable, which took three years to install, carried
   close to 300,000 calls in its first year.

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE
E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There
are two formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the
   World Wide Web late Friday afternoon each week
   at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.

   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:

      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send
   an e-mail message to:

      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further
information, including permission to reprint or reproduce, please
e-mail jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from
sources which we believe to be reliable, but Angus
TeleManagement makes no warranties or representations
whatsoever regarding accuracy, completeness, or adequacy.
Opinions expressed are based on interpretation of available
information, and are subject to change. If expert advice on
the subject matter is required, the services of a competent
professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:26:49 -0500
From: San Antonio Express-News <sanantonio@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: School Teacher Sues Students Over Bogus MySpace Page


A high school assistant principal is suing two students and their 
parents, alleging the teens set up a Web page on MySpace.com in her name 
and posted obscene comments and pictures.

Anna Draker, an assistant principal at Clark High School, is claiming
defamation, libel, negligence and negligent supervision over the page
on the popular free-access Web site.

Draker claims two 16-year-olds, a junior and a sophomore, created the
page using her name and picture and wrote it as through Draker herself
had posted the information, according to Draker's attorney, Murphy
Klasing.

Draker found out in April that someone had created a page on
MySpace. It had been up about a month before she discovered it.

The site falsely identified Draker as a lesbian. Klasing said Draker,
who is married and has small children, was "devastated."

MySpace.com removed the page when Draker told them it wasn't hers.

One of the students also is facing criminal felony charges.

Bexar County Assistant District Attorney Jill Mata would not release
information about the case, but confirmed that juvenile charges are
pending against a local high school student involving retaliation and
fraudulent use of identifying information. Both are third-degree
felonies.

Draker is suing for an unspecified amount for damages for emotional
distress, mental anguish, lost wages and court costs.

Information from: San Antonio Express-News, http://www.mysanantonio.com

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:01:46 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Googling for ATM Master Passwords


Googling for ATM Master Passwords

By Ryan Naraine
September 21, 2006

Using clues obtained from a YouTube video and a simple four-word
Google search engine query, a criminal can find step-by-step
instructions for how to hack into and take control of thousands of
ATMs scattered around the United States.

Following up on a CNN report out of Virginia Beach, Va., here as a
YouTube video, that a man reprogrammed an ATM at a gas station to
dispense $20 bills instead of $5 bills, a New York-based security
researcher did some old-fashioned online sleuthing and discovered that
the operator manual for that specific model of ATM could be legally
obtained in about 15 minutes.

Dave Goldsmith, founder and president of penetration testing outfit
Matasano Security, in New York, did not say how he obtained the
operator manual-which contains master passwords and other sensitive
security information about the cash-dispensing machines-but an eWEEK
investigation shows that a simple Google query will return a 102-page
PDF file that provides a road map to the hack.

Goldsmith, a respected researcher who co-founded @Stake and 
previously led Symantec's Security Academy, said he traced clues from 
the video to identify the make and model of the ATM, a Tranax 
Mini-Bank 1500 Series, and started an experiment to see how easy it 
would be to legally obtain an operator manual.

In an interview with eWEEK, Goldsmith said he first dug around on 
Tranax Technologies' Web site and found a knowledge base article that 
mentioned that the ATM is programmed with passwords that can be found 
in the operator's manual.

...

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2018674,00.asp

------------------------------

From: captainido@gmail.com
Subject: Modem/Fax Keeps Timing Out
Date: 21 Sep 2006 06:54:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


We are experiencing problems with a fax server that we wrote in
 .NET/C#. The server sends and receive faxes, either through multiple
modems or one single modem that is used for both outgoing and
incoming.

The server works perfectly well with all of our clients -- except one.
This one client receives a "Time out during send/receive" error for
25% of all incoming faxes; outgoing faxes work fine.

The client uses one modem for both incoming and outgoing faxes. The
line they use is a DSL line and has a filter that splits the line to
the fax-modem and the DSL modem.

So far, we have tried the follwing:

1. replaced the modem 5 times. Currently we are down to U.S Robotics
   56k ext fax-modem.  
2. checked the local phone company for line noises -- the line is fine.  
3. replaced the DSL filters with brand new ones.  
4. changed INIT strings on the modem several times. We are now using 
   the same init string which is used by another client
   with the same modem -- and this other client receives errors only 5%
   of the time. 
5. Replaced the computer that the modem was on.
6. Installed WinFax on the same machine and tried sending faxes to
   it -- the same problem happened. I must emphasized that we only
   tried this once, with one specific caller who kept failing to send
   faxes to this client.

 ... but alas, the problem still persists.

One strange characteristic of this problem, is that the errors come
from specific senders: once someone gets an error sending a fax to
this client, they can keep trying all they want, but the error will
keep happening.

Does anyone know of a specific problem with mixing Fax/DSL lines? does
anyone know of problems sending faxes from regular fax machines to
computerized systems, perhaps specifically under DSL lines? If so, is
this something we could resolve with different init strings?

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 21, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:54:24 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 21, 2006
********************************

U.K. Regulator Slams EU Plans for Internet TV
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20019?11228

     Ofcom has become the latest critic of the EU plan to regulate
     video content on the internet, warning that it would have a dire
     impact on Europe's internet TV, mobile multimedia, and online
     gaming industries. Earlier in the year, the EU had launched a
     major review of the 1989 'Television without Frontiers' (TWF)
     directive, ...

Time Warner to Sell AOL France Internet Business to Neuf Cegetel for About
$365 Million
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20008?11228

     NEW YORK -- Time Warner Inc. said it agreed to sell AOL
     France's Internet access business to Neuf Cegetel, a French
     telecommunications network operator, for about $365 million (E287.95
     million) in cash. Under the agreement announced Wednesday, Neuf
     Cegetel will acquire AOL's Internet access business in France,
     including ...

A Blackberry With a Camera
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20004?11228

     Tap-happy BlackBerry users will soon be able to press another
     button with their overworked fingers -- a shutter button. The new
     RIM BlackBerry Pearl is the first BlackBerry to offer a
     1.3-megapixel camera. The device also supplies music and video
     playback, expandable memory, a mapping application, EDGE support
     and Bluetooth ...

New Wireless Devices Unveiled
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20003?11228

     Several new wireless devices are hitting the market. In the
     category of new wireless handsets, T-Mobile USA introduced a new
     ultra-slim offering from Samsung, while Nokia unveiled a new 3G
     video phone and Motorola debuted a new fixed wireless
     phone. Meanwhile, Sprint Nextel announced an updated BlackBerry
     device from Research In Motion ...

Verizon GNOSC Monitors, Supports Gov't Managed Services
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20001?11228

     Verizon Business cut the ribbon to its new Government Network
     Operations and Security Center (GNOSC), which the carrier
     division says is 'dedicated to supporting the unique
     security and operational requirements of its federal government
     customers.' The GNOSC, located in Washington, D.C.'s
     Northern Virginia suburbs, ...

Moto's Symbolic Convergence
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19999?11228

     Motorola Inc.'s planned $3.9 billion acquisition of Symbol
     Technologies Inc. will give the firm more pieces to help it
     complete the enterprise fixed/mobile convergence puzzle. The
     world's second largest cellphone maker is already working on
     dualmode handsets to allow end-users to switch between WiFi and
     cellular ...

Carriers: Show Me the (Optical) Startups
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/19995?11228

     DALLAS -- Optical Expo 2006 -- Venture capitalists, get your
     wallets out. Service providers at a panel here today say there is
     still a need for more innovation in optical networking equipment.
     In a panel discussion on optical networking trends and
     tribulations, representatives from DynamicCity Inc. , Level 3
     Communications Inc., ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 22, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:52:50 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 22, 2006
********************************

Ericsson Wins Contract for Deutsche Telekom Optical Network Upgrade
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20042?11228

     Germany's fixed-line incumbent has selected the Swedish vendor
     Ericsson to provide its DWDM optical technology for a planned network
     upgrade. Deutsche Telekom's broadband and fixed-line unit, T-Com,
     expects to upgrade its metropolitan and regional networks in Germany.
     Under the terms of the contract, Ericsson will deliver its ...

Net Neutrality and Telco TV Telecoms Bill Looks Shaky
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20038?11228

     The Advanced Telecommunications and Opportunities Reform Act
     currently before legislators looks set to run into more problems
     as Senator Ted Stevens, chairman of the Senate Commerce
     Committee, has announced that it is currently short of the 60
     votes required to keep the bill from filibuster. A filibuster
     could fatally delay its passage ...

Motorola to Sell CellPhones Via Machine
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20035?11228

     CHICAGO -- Shoppers craving the latest Motorola Inc. cell phones
     and accessories will be able to buy them at automated sales
     machines being installed in nearly two dozen malls and airports
     nationwide.  The vending machine-like 'Instantmoto' stores will
     sell 12 kinds of phones and 18 accessories, said Bob Many,...

Dutch State to Sell Remaining 8 Percent Stake in KPN
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20033?11228

     AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- The Dutch government said Friday it
     will sell its remaining 8 percent stake in Royal KPN NV to cut
     the national debt. The phone company agreed to buy back around
     half of the stake for E800 million (US$1.01 billion), KPN said in
     a statement. The government is selling a total 167 million
     shares.  ...

Listen to This
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20030?11228

     One year ago, music on mobile phones reached a milestone with Cingular
     Wireless' introduction of the Motorola ROKR E1 phone that married
     Apple's iTunes music store with a phone. Since then, a lot has
     happened in the mobile music world. There are a lot more music
     phones available now, and a lot more music services available ...

Microsoft, Nokia Team for Mobile Search
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20028?11228

     Mobile search capabilities have become a hot topic in the
     wireless space as of late. The latest: Nokia is teaming with
     Microsoft to deliver advanced search capabilities to Nokia
     Nseries and other compatible S60 wireless devices.  Although
     terms of the agreement were not disclosed, Nokia has agreed to
     integrate Microsoft's Live...

Wireless Carriers Seek Stronger FCC Roaming Oversight
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20025?11228

     Some 25 U.S. regional and rural wireless operators essentially
     are asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to clamp
     down on the terms and conditions imposed on them regarding
     roaming agreements they must sign with larger wireless carriers.
     At issue are extremely high rates being asked and a tough
     contract-negotiation ...

Sprint Eyes WiMax Backhaul
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20021?11228

     NEW YORK -- When Sprint Nextel Corp.&nbsp;starts to roll out
     WiMax in Chicago and Washington, D.C., at the end of 2007 it is
     also considering using the wireless technology as a cost-
     effective way of providing backhaul for the new broadband
     networks.  At the jam-packed 'Backhaul Strategies for Mobile
     Operators' Light Reading ...

http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/profileLogin.php

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:19:07 -0500
From: Patrick Townson <ptownson@cableone.net>
Subject: Urgent Advisory: New Malware Attack Exploiting Internet Explorer


This came with this month's TerraWorld newsletter. TerraWorld is 
our local ISP here in much of Kansas.

URGENT ADVISORY: EVERYONE VULNERABLE TO NEW INTERNET EXPLORER EXPLOIT

A new malware attack that exploits Internet Explorer has been 
discovered. Terra World Technical Support recommends that you 
IMMEDIATELY update your anti-virus and anti-spyware software. A patch 
from Microsoft to correct this problem in Internet Explorer is not 
expected until October 10th. The United States Computer Emergency 
Readiness Team (US-CERT), part of the Department of Homeland Security, 
has information on their website:

http://www.us-cert.gov/current/current_activity.html

TERRA WORLD DOES NOT SEND EMAILS TO ITS CUSTOMERS WITH ATTACHMENTS. IF 
YOU RECEIVE AN EMAIL ALLEDGING TO ELIMINATE VIRUSES OR ANYTHING ELSE 
FROM YOUR COMPUTER, DELETE IT.

We have started receiving reports of customers receiving emails and who 
opened them, believing they are legitimate and from Terra World 
Technical Support. THEY ARE FAKE.

Do NOT open emails containing attachments from ANYONE -- EVEN IF YOU
KNOW THEM -- unless you know if advance that the email is coming and
what it contains. Being overly-cautious can save you hours and days of
aggravation. It takes only minutes to have someone re-send you an
email, if need be.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:01:55 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: September 21, 2006 - AOL France Sold to Neuf Cegetel


USTelecom dailyLead
September 21, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ewvkfDtusXcUxIBWZL


TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* AOL France sold to Neuf Cegetel
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* BT scopes out potential acquisitions
* Verizon's FiOS TV coming to Indiana
* Comcast tops 1M digital phone subscribers
* Cablevision has eye on commercial telephone market
* Motorola sells phones, accessories via vending machines
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* NEW from Steven Shepard -- WiMAX Crash Course
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* TiVo debuts pricey, feature-rich Series 3 DVR
* WiMAX gains some traction
* Intel installs WiMAX in remote Brazilian area
* Report: Muni Wi-Fi trend to keep growing
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC supports airlines' broadband at Boston's Logan
* Smaller bidders' share of airwave auction down significantly
DIVERSIONS
* Austin, Texas
* Costly, Sure, but It's Nirvana for TiVo Fans
* With Harrods as Your Neighbor
* Some Hot Recorders for Those Cool Podcasts
* The Power of an Image Drives Film by Eastwood

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ewvkfDtusXcUxIBWZL

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:11 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Verizon to Offer Local Content via FiOS


USTelecom dailyLead
September 22, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/exeQfDtusXcXsegsoq

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY

* Verizon to offer local content via FiOS
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* What does Malone want with DirecTV?
* Charter boosts online speed with 10-mbps service
* Yahoo! to offer refunds after tech glitch mars NFL streaming
* Private equity firms eye Telecom Italia assets
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies, Part II
HOT TOPICS
* Citizens to acquire Commonwealth Telephone
* Wireless auction brings in record $13.9B
* BellSouth inks deals to market triple-play services
* BT to introduce fixed-mobile service for large businesses
* Nortel considering Force10 acquisition
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Virgin Trains to offer Wi-Fi
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* Study: Cable VoIP outperforms other services
* Orange to market mobile/Wi-Fi service
* Alarm.com inks VoIP deal with SunRocket
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Sources: FCC recommends approval of AT&T-BellSouth deal
* Dutch government unloads rest of KPN stake
DIVERSIONS
* Wal-Mart to Offer $4 Generic Prescriptions
* The Little Desert That Grew in Maine
* A Parisian Love Story in Forward, and Sideways, Motion
* Under Sail, Under Wraps
* It's a Good Time to Be a Landlord

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/exeQfDtusXcXsegsoq

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #341
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Sep 25 01:47:03 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 888A3224A; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #342
Message-Id: <20060925054703.888A3224A@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:49:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 342

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Criminals Flocking to the Internet (Reuters News Wire)
    Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds (Martha Mendoza)
    Wal-Mart Says Not Trying to Fight Movie Downloads (Gina Keating)
    Google Decides to Publish the Ruling Against It (Reuters News Wire)
    Headset Hack (BrianEWilliams)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:13:33 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Criminals Flocking to the Internet


Criminals are increasingly trying to trick citizens into giving them
their bank account details, according to a survey published on Monday
which showed such "phishing" attempts almost doubled in the first six
months.

Over 157,000 unique phishing messages were sent out around the world
in the first half of 2006, an increase of 81 percent compared with the
six-month period to end-December 2005.

Each message can go to thousands or hundreds of thousands of
consumers, according to the bi-annual Internet Security Threat Report
from security software vendor Symantec.

"Organized crime is here and they are very interested in
phishing. They target home users who have become the weakest link,"
said research scientist Ollie Whitehouse.

Phishers send around emails, pretending to be a financial institution
or other legitimate organization, and ask to verify personal
information such as account numbers and passwords.

They target their victims much more closely than before, by tracking
down full names and personal interests.

"They skim social networking sites and personal websites. Most people,
by now, have left a digital footprint which can be mined," Whitehouse
said.

Another trend in the first half of the year is that phishers have
become more sophisticated, dodging spam filters and other defense
mechanisms designed by service providers and software companies to
keep out the criminals.

How much financial damage phishers have caused is unclear and usually
at an individual level, which is why phishing does not get the same
media attention as "denial of service attacks" aimed to take out a
specific web site, or email worms which can shut down millions of
computers in a digital equivalent of a carpet bombing.

The Internet is still under fire from such attacks, taking about 6,110
different denial of service hits every a day, but unlike a few years
ago they cause less damage.

"A successful 'denial of server' attack or worm can have ramifications
far beyond phishing. Worms have taken down electricity grids. That's
why critical infrastructure is now much more resilient. Information
technology managers are better prepared and networks are more robust,"
Whitehouse said.

Increased focus on security, and a willingness from software companies
to own up to their mistakes, has dramatically cut down the time that
computers are at risk, Symantec found.

Internet Explorer, the world's most popular browser from Microsoft,
has cut the number of days in which hackers can exploit a security
flaw to nine days from 25 days six months earlier.

Security holes in browsers from Opera and Mozilla Firefox are patched
within two days and one day respectively.

"Vendors are taking this much more seriously," Whitehouse said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:17:22 -0500
From: Martha Mendoza <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds


By MARTHA MENDOZA, AP National Writer

To Stephen Dunifer, it was yet another revolutionary moment. But to the 
untrained eye, it looked more like a geek fest. Over four days, a dozen 
men and women shyly bumped shoulders as they studied schematics and 
tinkered with romex connectors, resistors, microphone cords, meters, 
sockets and capacitors -- the stuff of illegal radio stations.

In the corner of this cluttered electronics lab, hunched over a
computer, sat Dunifer, their teacher, "the patron saint of pirate
radio." Part rock star, part Johnny Appleseed and fully the bane of
the Federal Communications Commission, Dunifer has long, gray hair,
large, clear glasses and a deep commitment to what he calls "Free
Radio."

"We're not stealing anything. We're claiming something that's
rightfully ours," he says.

His goal is to create FM radio stations faster than the FCC can shut
them down.

"It's always been our position that if enough people go on the air
with their stations, the FCC will be overwhelmed and unable to
respond," he says.

Pirate radio is radio without a license, radio without government 
regulations. It's "america the criminal" at midnight on Human Rights 
Radio in Springfield, Illinois and pre-dawn erotica on Freak Radio in 
Santa Cruz, Calif. It's an inordinate amount of Frank Zappa at WFZR in 
West End, Pa. (a station dedicated to playing his music) and the "Voice 
of the American Patriot" ("no support for liberals disguised as wannabe 
Conservatives") at NLNR in Butte, Mont.

The rapidly proliferating scofflaws -- and there are now hundreds of
them broadcasting at any given moment in this country -- are usually
only audible within a few miles of their "home-brewed"
transmitters. They find unused sections of the FM dial, fire up their
mini-transmitters, raise their antennas and set up their station.

Some opt to broadcast on the Internet as well, opening up their
audience to the entire globe. Costs typically range from about $250 to
$1,500.

Pirates, as they call themselves, draw loyal audiences in their
communities but complaints from the larger, licensed public and
private radio stations who say the microbroadcasters interrupt their
signals.  And they are a thorn in the side of the FCC, which is tasked
with shutting them down.

Ten miles away from Dunifer's radio camp, at an undisclosed location
in San Francisco, an FCC enforcement team is part of a nationwide
campaign to thwart the pirates.

A record 185 unlicensed broadcasters received fines, cease and desist
letters or had been raided by the by early September, up from 151
enforcement actions in all of 2005 and 92 in 2004, according to John
Anderson, an expert on pirate radio who tracks FCC enforcement at
University of Illinois' Institute of Communications Research. His data
show a steady increase in pirate radio enforcement dating back 10
years.

"There are a lot more stations out there these days, thus there are a
lot more stations for the FCC to find and bust," said Anderson.

Despite federal laws that ban unlicensed radio, efforts to shut down
the stations are rarely popular and appear to be ineffectual, at least
some of the time. For example:

_The neon sign says "ON AIR" at the storefront KNOZ station in
Sacramento, Calif., even though broadcaster William Major was fined
$10,000 by the FCC in June. Major says he's been wrongly painted as a
pirate station, and that the FCC just overlooked his license
application which he says is still pending. And the fine? "It's 10
G's," he said. "I don't have 10 G's. But they're being real gentleman
about it, you know what I mean? They gave us the fine and they're
letting us do our thing."

_Residents of Brattleboro, Vt., are also once again listening to free
radio. Last summer the FCC raided and shut down their 10-watt Radio
Free Brattleboro, prompting an ongoing federal court battle. This
summer a new community radio station received permits to open and
raised a 30-foot antenna.

_When federal agents raided Free Radio Santa Cruz in 2004, a crowd of 
several hundred protesters soon gathered at the 10-year-old broadcast 
center -- including the mayor, who was shouting through a bullhorn. The 
tires on the FCC agents' cars were slashed before they could leave, and 
then they received parking tickets before they could repair them. A few 
days later a fundraiser brought in more than $25,000 and Freak Radio, 
which is still on the air, was launched.

The FCC's beef, insisted spokesman David Fiske, is with neither the
public dissent nor the abundance of Frank Zappa music. The problem is
that pirate radio stations can make it impossible for the public to
listen to licensed broadcasting and can cut into air traffic control
communications, he said.

"We are completely complaint driven," he said. "If there are more
enforcement actions, that's because there have been more complaints."

The FCC's 2007 budget includes an additional $1,080,000 for Mobile
Digital Direction Finding Vehicles which can be used to sniff out
pirate radio stations. But that same budget includes no extra staffing
for the FCC's 333-person enforcement bureau, which is tasked with
policing everything from cable television to telephone
services. They're supposed to investigate obscene broadcasts, bust
unwanted faxers and regulate the airwaves.

Pirate radio in its current form dates back 21 years to Zoom Black
Magic Radio in Fresno, Calif., founded by Walter Dunn to bring
diversity to the FM dial. The FCC raided his station and fined him
$2,000 two years later, but like stations of today, he quickly popped
up nearby.

At Dunifer's Radio Camp, students are warned about the FCC and taught
how to evade the enforcement agents. At the end of four intense days,
they walked out holding their own, hand-built, ready-to-use FM radio
transmitter, a shiny box slightly larger than a brick.

Participants came from as far away as Namibia and as nearby as five
blocks away.

Their reasons for wanting their own station were equally diverse: a
neat, middle-aged woman from Mexico, accompanied by a translator, said
she wanted to bring news and political information to her community;
two young men from Tucson in flowered shirts and sandals said they
wanted to start a new pirate station to replace several that have been
shut down by the FCC; a self-described "boring insurance clerk" in a
lilac blazer was just "looking for something interesting to do"; a man
with red dreadlocks, green earrings and tattooed arms was slated to
take over the technology job at his local pirate station.

No one is sorrier to hear about these Radio Camp graduates than Dennis
Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of Broadcasters, who
described Dunifer as "the patron saint of pirate radio." And he didn't
mean it as praise.

He said his members, frustrated by interference on their stations,
push the FCC to enforce the rules against pirate operators.

"You'd be hard pressed to find a pirate radio station that isn't
interfering with another licensed station," he said.

But Wharton conceded that the FCC's policing efforts can be futile.

"It's like whack a mole," he said. "You knock it out in one place and
it pops up somewhere else."

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:55:16 -0500
From: Gina Keating, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Wal-Mart Says Not Trying to Fight Movie Downloads


By Gina Keating

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. disputed a report on Friday saying it was trying
to dissuade movie studios from working with other forms of
distribution, such as Apple Computer Inc.'s iTunes.

The New York Post reported that the world's largest retailer had
warned Hollywood it may retaliate against studios for selling movies
on iTunes amid concerns that Wal-Mart's DVD sales will suffer.

Shares of Apple and Walt Disney Co., which this month became the first
Hollywood studio to offer full-length movies on iTunes, both fell more
than 2 percent on Friday.

Some analysts, though, questioned whether concerns about Wal-Mart were
the main contributor to the share price declines. Sanders Morris
Harris analyst David Miller said Disney more likely dropped in
reaction to fears of an economic slowdown, along with the broader
market.

Wal-Mart disputed the Post report and said it was not pressuring movie
studios into shunning online delivery.

"Customers want to watch movies and they want to be able to make the
choice when and how they want to view them," a Wal-Mart spokeswoman
said.

"While we recognize there are various current and potential providers
of this service, we are not dissuading studios from conducting
business with other providers."

Apple and Disney announced plans this month to sell movie downloads on
iTunes. Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger said on Tuesday the company
sold 125,000 downloads, worth $1 million in revenue, from iTunes in
the offering's first week.

A Disney spokeswoman said she was not familiar with the claims in the
Post report. An Apple spokesman could not be reached for comment.

A source familiar with the situation said while big retailers like
Wal-Mart "freaked out" earlier in the year when Disney and other
studios began selling TV shows on iTunes and other Web-based
platforms, they showed no particular concern when Disney became the
first studio to offer movies on iTunes.

The source, who declined to be identified, said the discount retailer
learned over the intervening months that customers who download --
primarily young, single males -- are not the same as those customers
who buy DVDs.

"I don't think Wal-Mart or Target or any of the big box retailers are
nervous," the source said, "because we have had almost a year of
learning and development, and it has proven not to be that threatening."

Iger has repeatedly said digital content delivery platforms such as
iTunes have not cut into DVD retail sales or TV viewership.

Disney shares fell 2 percent to $30.08 on Friday on the New York Stock 
Exchange. Apple shed 2.2 percent to $73 on Nasdaq. Wal-Mart shares eased 
0.4 percent at $48.29 on the NYSE.

(With additional reporting by Nicole Maestri in New York)

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:10:30 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-diges.org>
Subject: Google Decides to Publish the Ruling Against It


Google Inc. on Saturday published on its Belgian website a court order
which forbids the Internet search engine to reproduce snippets of
Belgian press on its news amalgamation service.

The move constituted a u-turn as Google had said on Friday that it
would not comply with the court order despite facing a fine of 500,000
euros ($640,900) daily if it did not publish the ruling.

A spokeswoman for Google declined to elaborate on the reasons that
made the company change its mind but said it would seek to cancel the
ruling.

"We are pleased that a judge has given Google the opportunity to
appeal the substance of this case. This will be heard in November,"
the spokeswoman said.

Google News lists headlines and a few sentences of text from news
articles around the world and links back to a publication's own Web
site for users to read the whole item.

Any publisher can opt out by asking Google to remove its content, but
publishers argue that by reproducing the material in the first place
Google is violating copyright law.

The Belgian case was brought by Copiepresse, an organization that
manages copyrights for French and German language newspapers.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

From: BrianEWilliams <sorry_no_email@yahoo.com>
Subject: Headset Hack
Date: 24 Sep 2006 13:33:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I am addicted to my telephone headset, and I like using a corded phone
for the sound quality and privacy.  Caller ID is a must, and phones
that have all these features (headsets, wired, and Caller ID) tend to
be more expensive business models.

This is the hack I thought of to let me use a cheap Wal*Mart wired
phone with a headset.  Simply wire a connection between the coiled
handset cord and my headset.  There are 4 connectors on the coiled
handset cord, one for talking, one for listening, and a ground each.
My headset has a 1/8" male stereo jack at the end.  The part furtherst
from the tip would take both the ground wires, and then I just have to
find which is the mike, and which is the earpiece.

Then I have to find out what the 4 wires in the coiled handset cord
are and connect them correctly.  Is there any reason this won't work?
Any good ideas on how to best make the connection?  Thanks.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #342
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Mon Sep 25 16:18:36 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 41AFD2242; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #343
Message-Id: <20060925201836.41AFD2242@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:20:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 343

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them (Brian Bergstein, AP)
    Hackers Now Targeting Home Computer Users (Jay Wrolstad, Newsfactor)
    Trend Micro Launches Anti-BotNet Service  (Paul F. Roberts) 
    VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: Headset Hack (BrianEWilliams)
    Re: Headset Hack (Ron Kritzman)
    Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds (mc)
    Re: Modem/Fax Keeps Timing Out (David Quinton)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:22:33 -0500
From: Brian Bergstein, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them


By BRIAN BERGSTEIN, AP Technology Writer

A hallmark of "Mission: Impossible" was the message that would
self-destruct after a spy played it. Now a startup communications
company promises that same level of secrecy with a Web-based messaging
system designed to leave no traces.

The VaporStream system from Void Communications LLC is envisioned as a
complement to e-mail and instant messaging, both of which leave
abundant records.

Let's say Alice wants to discuss something privately with Bob. Alice
calls up a VaporStream Web page, which is encrypted by the same method
that secures Internet commerce and banking. Then she selects Bob on
her list of VaporStream chat partners.

That brings up a new window, where she can type a message. Neither her 
name nor Bob's appears anywhere. The individual messages cannot be 
copied or pasted into other programs.

When she sends the message, it no longer is visible on her computer. It 
goes to a server maintained by VaporStream, where it sits in a sort of 
holding pattern in a temporary segment of the server's memory.

When Bob checks his VaporStream Web page, he can see that he has a 
message from Alice and clicks to read it. When it is delivered, it 
leaves the VaporStream server for good.

When Bob responds, Alice's original message disappears from his 
computer. On and on it goes, in a conversation in which both parties 
have to remember their previous lines, making VaporStream more like a 
time-shifted phone conversation than an e-mail thread.

"Neither the sender nor the recipient has a full copy," said Amit Shah, 
the co-founder and chief technologist.

VaporStream is scheduled to be unveiled at the influential DEMOfall tech 
show in San Diego on Tuesday and become generally available in October.

Shah and co-founder Joseph Collins Jr. hope VaporStream's design and low 
cost -- $40 per user annually -- will attract companies that are swamped 
with the challenge of archiving business-critical e-mails and throwing 
away those of a personal or inconsequential nature.

A company could tell its employees to do all of their informal 
communications in VaporStream, for example. Besides PCs, VaporStream 
will be available for mobile gadgets such as BlackBerrys.

That's not to say that this is a natural for the business world.

Financial services firms, for example, are likely to reject
VaporStream because of regulatory requirements governing the retention
of their electronic communications. Other companies simply might not
trust their workers enough to give them a record-less method of
communication.

"I don't typically have customers come to me and say, `I'm looking for
a messaging system where I can hide all traces of what I'm saying,'"
said Matt Brown, a senior analyst at Forrester Research. Of
VaporStream's overall prospects, he said, "I'm highly skeptical."

Companies also can set up "blacklists" and "whitelists" for their
employees that dictate who can and cannot send VaporStreams to each
other.

However, Nancy Flynn, founder of the ePolicy Institute, which trains
companies on proper use of e-mail, said she suspects some businesses
will welcome VaporStream because it could help them better articulate
rules about when employees should and should not use e-mail.

Many e-mails have to be kept for audits, regulatory purposes or
lawsuits, but personal messages that invariably get swept into that
mix are often embarrassing, not to mention costly to store, she noted.

VaporStream isn't entirely dependent on businesses. Anyone can sign up
for $40 a year.

But secrecy-seeking criminals, take note: While the system records no
conversation logs, Collins said VaporStream will comply with
wiretapping laws. That means the authorities would not be able to
review past chats, but they could get warrants giving them the right
to put an ear to future ones.

On the Net:
http://www.vaporstream.com

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:32:55 -0500
From: Jay Wrolstad <newsfactor@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Hackers Now Targeting Home Computer Users


by Jay Wrolstad, newsfactor.com

Home computer users, most of whom don't take even rudimentary measures
to protect their PCs, are increasingly finding themselves under attack
by phishers and malware miscreants who are getting much better at
their nefarious work.

That's the conclusion drawn in Symantec's latest security threat report.

Symantec found that home users now comprise 86 percent of all targeted
attacks against computers, followed by businesses in the
financial-services industry.

With hackers aiming at desktop applications and developing new,
sophisticated tactics to avoid detection, scattershot Internet worms
and viruses have given way to more focused assaults whose purpose is
largely fraud and identity theft.

"Home users face a bigger threat since they do not have security
[policies] put upon them," said Natalie Lambert, an analyst at
Forrester Research. The security settings on corporate users' PCs are
dictated by I.T. workers, she explained. But home users are left to
their own devices and typically do a poor job managing their security,
she said.

"Even after these home users install their software, they still have
to keep it updated -- something most still have not mastered," she
went on to say. "And since PCs are only as secure as their last
update, home users will continue to be at risk."

Ignorance Not Bliss

Even as security companies are attempting to bolster PC defenses with
traditional antivirus strategies, Symantec found that attackers are
delivering their malicious code through zero-day security
vulnerabilities in e-mail applications and Web browsers.

Web browser flaws represented 69 percent of all vulnerabilities
documented by Symantec in the first half of 2006, with 47
vulnerabilities documented in Mozilla browsers (up from 17 in the last
reporting period), 38 in Microsoft Internet Explorer (compared to 25),
and 12 in Apple Safari (compared to six).

Additionally, phishers are learning to bypass spam-filtering
technologies, the Symantec report noted. Most phishers have gotten
wise to new spam- and virus-fighting technologies and now exclude
malicious code from their mass mailings to enhance the chances of
making it into the inboxes of unsuspecting users. Instead, they now
simply include links to Web sites hosting the malicious code.

Also of note in the report is the fact that Symantec identified some
4.6 million active zombie computers under the control of hackers and
the period. These zombie machines are used not only to level
denial-of-service attacks at Web sites who refuse to pony up ransom
money, but also to spread malicious code through spam messages.

Financial gain remains the motivation behind many of these threats,
Symanted reported.

Future Bleak

Yankee Group analyst Jonathan Singer suggested that the proliferation
of spam engines and botnets can be attributed to the successes hackers
have experienced thus far. "It's a lot easier to go after an
unsuspecting user than try to break into a enterprise network," he
said.

Even those users with antispyware installed on their machines remain
susceptible to phishing attacks that use social-engineering tricks to
trick people into providing their sensitive financial information on
bogus Web sites, Singer said.

Both he and Lambert said common sense can go a long way toward
thwarting these attacks. "You should always be wary of suspicious
e-mails, and always type in the URL of a bank or other site rather
than clicking on a link provided in a message," said Singer.

The best way you can protect yourself is to keep your system patched,
update your security software, and not open suspicious attachments,
Lambert said. She also advised installing a security suite that
consists of firewall and antispyware software, in addition to
antivirus capabilities.

The Symantec report said that, in the future, the present situation is
likely to worsen, with more threats designed to exploit personal
software and Microsoft's forthcoming Windows Vista operating system.

Copyright 2006 NewsFactor Network, Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:37:31 -0500
From: Paul F. Roberts <trendmicro@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Trend Micro Lauches Anti-Botnet Service


by Paul F. Roberts

Trend Micro announced a new service to help large organizations and
Internet service providers (ISPs) fight networks of zombie machines,
known as "botnets."

The new service, dubbed InterCloud, was announced Monday and is
intended to help organizations fight botnets, fast-changing networks
of rogue computers that are used in denial of service (DOS) attacks,
spam campaigns, identity theft, and other malicious acts. The new
service uses behavioral analysis technology, developed by Trend, and
known as Behavioral Analysis Security Engine (BASE) to spot and
isolate bot machines on managed networks, according to Paul Moriarty,
director of product development for Internet Content Security at
Trend.

BASE analyzes application and network infrastructure data, such as DNS
queries and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing tables. The engine
can spot behavior indicative of bots, such as an abnormal series of
DNS queries.

The service also uses data from Trend's global network of researchers
and customers to provide intelligence on new or evolving bot activity.
The company's Bot Identification Team identify and monitor bot
activity globally, Trend said.

InterCloud relies, in part, on a new, hardened and revamped DNS server
that allows Trend to aggregate suspicious data and report on host
systems that may be infected with bot programs, Moriarty said.

"We can take a day's worth of DNS logs and tell them how many spambots
or zombies they have. That's a capability that most ISPs lack," he
said.

InterCloud customers can remediate infected systems by denying them
access to the network, or by quarantining them and pushing out
necessary updates or scanning and disinfecting them, said Dave Rand,
CTO of Trend's Internet Content Security group.

The InterCloud service includes a Web-based management portal for
viewing and reporting on bot activity and managing security policies,
Trend said.

Botnets are one of the fastest growing and most dangerous online
threats, said Rand. On any day, Trend tracks millions of infected
systems that have been joined to one of a number of global bot
networks.  But bot infections can also jump up, depending on the
availability of easy to exploit security holes, such as the recent VML
vulnerability in Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser, or the Windows
Server Service vulnerability that was disclosed by Microsoft in
August.

Trend identified more than 250,000 new bots each day for the two days
after an exploit was developed for the Server Service hole, which
Microsoft patched with MS06-040. Typically, the company might identify
250,000 new bots over the course of a month, Moriarty said.

Trend researchers are also spotting many more targeted attacks, in
which bots are being written for specific purposes, such as culling
sensitive information from the targeted network, then forwarding it
back to a command and control server, usually in a foreign
country. Many of those appear aimed at identity theft, or espionage
against the U.S. government or government contractors.

Few enterprise security products can scale to support hundreds of
thousands or millions of hosts, which means that ISPs and very large
organizations often rely on internal security teams and products to
manage security. However, those company-focused teams lack the broad
perspective that companies with global research operations and a
global customer base can muster, Moriarty said.

InterCloud, which will be licensed by the seat, will offer ISPs the
prospect of turning security into a profit center, by focusing
attention on the relatively small number of infected systems, then
targeting their owners with software, such at Trend's Web-based
HouseCall antivirus scanner, that can clean their system and keep it
from becoming reinfected. ISPs could then get a share of any software
sales made through that channel, Moriarty said.

Trend Micro will feature InterCloud Security Service and the BASE 
technology at DEMOfall '06 this week in San Diego.


Copyright 2006 Yahoo! Inc.

For more tech news from the internet each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:14:24 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers


USTelecom dailyLead
September 25, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/exrAfDtusXddanMYTl

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* VoIP attracts small-business customers
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Cable subs far outnumber those of satellite, study says
* RIM to step up presence in Japan
* Cisco, H-P accelerate shift to 10-Giagbit Ethernet with new products
* WiMAX generates buzz
* Amp'd signs distribution deal with Circuit City
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies, Part II 
HOT TOPICS
* Citizens to acquire Commonwealth Telephone
* Wireless auction brings in record $13.9B
* BellSouth inks deals to market triple-play services
* Verizon to offer local content via FiOS
* Iowa telecoms eye triple play for rural customers
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* More companies using text messaging as advertising tool
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* California's TV market about to get a shake-up
DIVERSIONS
* A Dog's Life, Upgraded
* The Riches of Lucca
* 2007 Porsche 911 Turbo: Kinetic Art That Really Moves You
* Sofia Coppola's Paris
* The Hearing Aid as Fashion Statement

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/exrAfDtusXddanMYTl

------------------------------

From: BrianEWilliams <sorry_no_email@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Headset Hack
Date: 25 Sep 2006 06:14:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


BrianEWilliams wrote:

> I am addicted to my telephone headset, and I like using a corded phone
> for the sound quality and privacy.  Caller ID is a must, and phones
> that have all these features (headsets, wired, and Caller ID) tend to
> be more expensive business models.

> This is the hack I thought of to let me use a cheap Wal*Mart wired
> phone with a headset.  Simply wire a connection between the coiled
> handset cord and my headset.  There are 4 connectors on the coiled
> handset cord, one for talking, one for listening, and a ground each.
> My headset has a 1/8" male stereo jack at the end.  The part furtherst
> from the tip would take both the ground wires, and then I just have to
> find which is the mike, and which is the earpiece.

> Then I have to find out what the 4 wires in the coiled handset cord
> are and connect them correctly.  Is there any reason this won't work?
> Any good ideas on how to best make the connection?  Thanks.

I tried lots of different combinations connections, but I couldn't get
the headset to work.  I know phone wiring is pretty funky, so maybe
the whole concept is flawed.  Radio Shack has a $22 device that lets
you add a headset to any phone.  It takes batteries, so maybe I am
missing a power source when I just hook it up directly, or maybe some
modification to the circuit needs to be done.

After cutting the coiled cord that goes to the handset, I have a red,
yellow, black and green wire.  I think the red and green go to the
handset speaker and the black and yellow go to the mouthpiece.  I
think green is ground, and I am guessing black is ground, but I don't
have any good reason for that.  Googling the subject led me to a lot
of information on the wiring between the phone and the central switch,
but nothing specific to the wiring between the phone and handset.
This is an example of what I found:

http://www.homephonewiring.com/clr-code.html

It seems to contradict what I found yesterday, so I'll try a different
combination.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:26:01 -0500
From: Ron Kritzman <ron@dbOnayAmspaYmasters.com>
Subject: Re: Headset Hack


BrianEWilliams wrote:

> This is the hack I thought of to let me use a cheap Wal*Mart wired
> phone with a headset.  Simply wire a connection between the coiled
> handset cord and my headset.  There are 4 connectors on the coiled
> handset cord, one for talking, one for listening, and a ground each.
> My headset has a 1/8" male stereo jack at the end.  The part furtherst
> from the tip would take both the ground wires, and then I just have to
> find which is the mike, and which is the earpiece.

On a standard 2.1 mm headset jack the tip is the mike and the ring is
the ear piece. A standard 4 pin modular handset cord uses the two
inner conductions for the ear piece and the outer conductors for the
microphone.

I have done this on several telephones with varying success. The two big 
'ifs' are as follows:

1) The telephone must expect an electret condenser mike, and yes they 
are polarity sensitive. If the phone is looking for a carbon mike 
element or an assembly emulating one, you're out of luck.

2) The design of the phone must be such that the mike the ear piece 
share a common ground. You have 4 wires and 3 pins, so if you can't 
common the grounds, its not going to happen. You could modify the 
headset to use a 4 pin connector, but that defeats the purpose of being 
able to use the headset as is.

This all assumes that you are talking about a dial-in-base telephone.

If you have the dial-in-handset type, the base is often nothing more
than a weighted cradle that passes tip and ring through to the
handset, and none of this applies.

- Ron

Emoveray ethay Igpay Atinlay otay eplyray

------------------------------

From: mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address>
Subject: Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:45:25 -0400


Martha Mendoza <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote in message 
news:telecom25.342.2@telecom-digest.org:

> By MARTHA MENDOZA, AP National Writer

> To Stephen Dunifer, it was yet another revolutionary moment. But to the
> untrained eye, it looked more like a geek fest. Over four days, a dozen
> men and women shyly bumped shoulders as they studied schematics and
> tinkered with romex connectors, resistors, microphone cords, meters,
> sockets and capacitors -- the stuff of illegal radio stations.

I'd be inclined to favor an easy licensing system for very-low-power
stations, subject only to the condition that each one originates its
own programming and does not simply relay something else.  But I
strongly suspect the "pirates" wouldn't get licenses even if licenses
were available.  

 From the rest of the story, it sounds like being illegal, and
deliberately antagonizing the FCC, is part of the game.

There's also the issue of technical standards -- staying on frequency
and not having harmonics that take out something else, such as fire
departments or air traffic signals.

And also the issue of paying for the music that they broadcast, if
they broadcast commercially produced music.  I'll bet they don't want
to do that.

> Some opt to broadcast on the Internet as well, opening up their
> audience to the entire globe.

That, of course, requires no license at all and should be encouraged.
It still requires the permission of music copyright holders.

> _When federal agents raided Free Radio Santa Cruz in 2004, a crowd of
> several hundred protesters soon gathered at the 10-year-old broadcast
> center -- including the mayor, who was shouting through a bullhorn. The
> tires on the FCC agents' cars were slashed before they could leave, and
> then they received parking tickets before they could repair them.

Is Santa Cruz trying to secede from the United States, then?  And even
 from the International Telecommunications Union?

I don't think any of these "rebels" realize is that the only reason
they *have* clear channels to transmit on is that the FCC regulates
radio.  If there were no regulation, competitors would be free to jam
each other and would do so.

------------------------------

From: David Quinton <usenet_2005D_email@REMOVETHISBITbizorg.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Modem/Fax Keeps Timing Out
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:42:27 +0100


On 21 Sep 2006 06:54:05 -0700, captainido@gmail.com wrote:

It's been a few years since I've had to tweak a faxmodem card, but I
think the clue may be here VVV

> One strange characteristic of this problem, is that the errors come
> from specific senders: once someone gets an error sending a fax to
> this client, they can keep trying all they want, but the error will
> keep happening.

I think that the fact it's ADSL may be less relevant than the
*sending* number or -- more specifically -- the Chipset of *their*
faxmodem and its compatability with yours?

I'd be interested to see if the problem is replicated if these senders
sent faxes to one of your other (fault-free) clients' numbers ...

The only ADSL-related aspect I can think of woudl be if the
Microfilter is faulty. But you say you've already replaced it.

Very puzzling!

Locate your Mobile phone: <http://www.bizorg.co.uk/news.html>
Great gifts: http://www.ThisBritain.com/ASOS_popup.html

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #343
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep 26 15:35:46 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 7F05221EE; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #344
Message-Id: <20060926193546.7F05221EE@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:38:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 344

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Cuba Fires Telecom, Computing CEOs in Shake-Up (Marc Frank, Reuters)
    US Panel Wants Answers from Wireless Firms on Privacy (Reuters News Wire)
    Streaming Video Goes Corporate With Cisco Products (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Karen Rose Appointed as ISOC'S Director of Education (Peter Godwin)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 25, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: Headset Hack (W Howard)
    Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds (Mark Atwood)
    Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds (harold@hallikainen.com)
    Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them (Mr Joseph Singer)
    Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them (George Mitchell)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:34:46 -0500
From: Marc Frank, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Cuba Fires Telecom, Computing CEOs in Shake-Up


By Marc Frank

HAVANA, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Cuba has fired the heads of two of the
country's most influential companies in a bid to bring the computing
and telecommunications enterprises back under firm state control amid
a national anti-corruption drive, industry sources said on Monday.

Information Technology and Communications Minister Ramiro Valdes, 74,
a former revolutionary hero, took over the sensitive sector that
controls communist Cuba's communications, computing, Internet and
software development late last month.

His was acting president Raul Castro's sole ministerial appointment
since he took over temporarily from his brother Fidel Castro on July
31 after the latter underwent intestinal surgery.

The shake-up at the companies did not appear to be aimed at opening up
the sector to foreign capital or to information and entertainment from
outside the country, said the foreign and local sources, all of whom
wished to remain anonymous.

They said Valdes was unhappy with the independence shown by some
company directors and their inability to rein in subordinates despite
an ongoing drive to increase state control over the economy, improve
efficiency and fight corruption.

Cuban President Fidel Castro declared war on corruption a year ago,
warning it could undo his 1959 revolution. Together with his brother
Raul, Castro mobilized youth and Communist Party stalwarts to root out
corrupt practices within the state bureaucracy, leading to widespread
sackings in recent months.

Valdes fired the president of Empresa de Telecomunicacio1nes de Cuba SA
(Etecsa), Jose Antonio Fernandez, and the vice minister for
information, Nelson Ferrer, for failing to control the fixed-line and
mobile services monopoly, the sources said.

Etecsa, with revenues of more than $400 million in 2005 and in which
Telecom Italia <TLIT.MI> has a 27 percent interest, is one of the most
powerful and visible companies in the country.

Valdez also fired the president of the powerful state-run Copextel
corporation which imports, assembles and distributes advanced
communications, computing and other technology, the sources said.

Copextel, with annual revenues of more than $200 million, has been
caught up in recent corruption scandals involving kickbacks from
foreign companies.

Etecsa's new president, Maimir Mesa Ramos, and Copextel's new boss,
Antonio Orta Rodriguez, were both promoted from within the ranks.

International studies have found that Cuba occupies last place in
Latin America for both mobile phone and Internet penetration, and is
fifth from last in terms of its number of fixed telephone lines.

The government blames the four-decade-old U.S. trade embargo for its
poor communications infrastructure.

But Cuba's 11 million people cannot buy a computer or subscribe to the
Internet without a government permit, satellite television is
prohibited, and mobile phones are available only for hard currency.

(Additional reporting by Anthony Boadle)

 
Copyright Reuters 2006. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:39:33 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: US Panel Wants Answers from Wireless Firms on Privacy


WASHINGTON - Top executives of Verizon Communications <VZ.N>, Sprint
Nextel Corp. <S.N>, Cingular and T-Mobile USA have been 'invited' to
testify Friday at a U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing
into the use of deceptive measures to obtain personal information,
known as pretexting, the panel said on Monday.

The same panel will hear on Thursday from Hewlett-Packard Co. <HPQ.N>
chief executive Mark Hurd, former chairman Patricia Dunn, general
counsel Ann Baskins and other company officials about HP's use of
pretexting to investigate boardroom leaks.

The heads of the Federal Communications Commission, Kevin Martin, and
Federal Trade Commission, Deborah Majoras, have also been invited to
testify at the Friday hearing, which is on the broader issue of
pretexting.

The House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on investigations has spent
the past seven months looking into data brokers and their use of
pretexting to obtain consumers' call records and other private
information.

The panel's concern about unauthorized access to telephone records
gained new prominence after HP acknowledged its investigators used
false identities to obtain the telephone records of directors,
employees and journalists.

Last week, Hurd said he approved an e-mail ruse to track down
boardroom leaks, saying it was important to discover who gave
confidential information to news reporters. He was appointed chairman
of HP after the board asked Dunn to resign for her role in the
scandal.

HP is now under investigation by the U.S. Justice Department,
California's attorney general, the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and the House panel.

Copyright 2006 Reuters News Service.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:07:44 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Streaming Video Goes Corporate With New Cisco Products


USTelecom dailyLead
September 26, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eyaUfDtusXdgiubFNI

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Streaming video goes corporate with new Cisco products
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* T-Mobile plans new Internet phones, drops Zeta-Jones
* Moto beefs up VOD portfolio
* Q-and-A with Verizon Federal's Jerry Edgerton
* Starz expands movie deal with Sony
* It's BlackBerry vs. Redberry in China
* Cavalier acquires Talk America for $251M
* Skype targets enterprise customers with new software
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Learn More about Next Generation Wireless Applications
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* 4G is coming. Will anyone listen?
* Mercora unveils streaming music service for Windows Mobile 5.0 devices
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Hearing on pretexting scheduled for this week
DIVERSIONS
* Brilliant Birds and Bright Monkeys in Brazil
* Dealing With Those Alpha Types (and Winning)
* For Mel Gibson, a New Movie and More Notoriety
* 2006 Volvo V70 R: Speed in a Box, From Sweden
* The City That Silver Built

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:27 +0200
From: Peter Godwin <godwin@isoc.org>
Subject: Karen Rose Appointed as ISOC'S Director of Education and Programs


Reston, VA and Geneva, Switzerland - 26th September 2006 - The
Internet Society (ISOC) today announced the appointment of Karen Rose
as its Director of Education and Programs. This key appointment, which
is effective immediately, will further strengthen ISOC's role in
providing Internet education and training initiatives aimed at
promoting a sustainable, open, and accessible Internet for all.

In this newly-created position, Karen will drive ISOC's education and
training initiatives in support of the society's strategic objectives
in the area of capacity building and Internet education. These include
broad outreach and training activities aimed at helping local
communities develop sustainable Internet infrastructures and assisting
policy makers in understanding the technical underpinnings of
contemporary Internet issues.

Karen has extensive experience working with the Internet community,
including the IETF and the IAB, to promote the open development and
evolution of the Internet internationally.  Karen began her career at
as a policy analyst at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission
working on global Internet and e-commerce issues.  In 1998, she joined
the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the
U.S. Department of Commerce where her work focused on the coordination
of Internet naming and addressing functions, including the Internet
domain name system, ENUM, and IPv6.  In 2002, she left government to
join an Internet start-up in Sydney, Australia where her work focused
on corporate strategy, product development, and technology training.
Most recently, she has been an independent telecommunications and
Internet consultant based in Cairo, Egypt and Sydney, Australia.  She
has been an active participant in Internet discussions in various
international governmental and non-governmental organisations
including the ITU, OECD, CITEL, APEC, ICANN, and the PTC.

Karen will be undertaking her role with ISOC from the Asia-Pacific
region.

Lynn St. Amour, ISOC's President and CEO, said, "We are very pleased
to have Karen joining us as her background in policy and her knowledge
of key Internet technical matters is very well suited to helping ISOC
expand our educational activities in both policy and technical spheres
on a global level."


ABOUT ISOC

The Internet Society http://www.isoc.org is a not-for-profit
membership organization founded in 1992 to provide leadership in
Internet related standards, education, and policy. With offices in
Washington, DC, and Geneva, Switzerland, it is dedicated to ensuring
the open development, evolution and use of the Internet for the
benefit of people throughout the world. ISOC is the organizational
home of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and other
Internet-related bodies who together play a critical role in ensuring
that the Internet develops in a stable and open manner. For over 14
years ISOC has run international network training programs for
developing countries and these have played a vital role in setting up
the Internet connections and networks in virtually every country
connecting to the Internet during this time.

FOR FURTHER DETAILS:

Internet Society
E-mail: info@isoc.org

1775 Wiehle Ave.,Suite 102
Reston, VA 20190-5108, USA

4 rue des Falaises
CH-1205 Geneva
Switzerland

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 25, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:50 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 25, 2006
********************************

Consolidations Continue as Cavalier Buys Talk America for US$251 mil.
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20071?11228

     Consolidation within the U.S. telecoms industry continues with
     the acquisition of Talk America by the smaller, privately held
     company Cavalier Telephone &amp; TV, announced on Friday. At
     US$8.10 a share, a 23% premium on Thursday&#39;s closing price,
     the deal is valued at US$251 ...

Portugal Telecom Unions Back Sonaecom Takeover Bid
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20068?11228

     Unions at Portugal Telecom have opted to support Sonaecom's
     takeover bid rather than back the restructuring plan of the
     Portuguese incumbent's chief executive Henrique Granadeiro, the
     Jornal deNegcios reports. Granadeiro plans to reduce the
     company's workforce by 1,000 a year over the next three years,
     whereas ...

Mercora to Debut Mobile Music Service
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20063?11228

     LOS ANGELES -- Mercora Inc., which distributes software for
     webcasting music, is making a bid for the bourgeoning mobile
     music market with a new application that enables users of select
     wireless devices to listen to tracks stored on PCs or other
     users' computers.  The Santa Clara-based firm was to debut
     the service, dubbed ...

Say Hello to New Communication Twists
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20061?11228

     SAN JOSE, California -- The world has instant messaging. Text
     messages. E-mail. Voicemail. Blogs. Online social networks. And
     the good old cell phone. But, if you thought there were enough
     ways to communicate with others, think again.  At this week's
     DEMOfall 2006 conference in San Diego, a showcase of some of the
     most ...

A Step Toward Nanotelecom Technology
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20059?11228

     Nanotechnology holds the key to developing mobile telecom
     products, including phones and wireless data devices, that are
     smaller than a shirt button. Such systems could be easily and
     inexpensively integrated into an array of items, ranging from
     clothing to credit cards to supermarket products to computer
     chips. In a step potentially ...

Palm Remains Upbeat on Q1 Profit
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20058?11228

     Palm continues to remain profitable, but CEO and President Ed
     Colligan says the company's top line isn't good enough, and
     executives are determined to improve the company's competitive
     position in the coming months. Colligan's message came as the
     Sunnyvale, Calif., company yesterday reported revenue of ...
     $355.8...
Sprint Nextel Readies Continued Reseller Court Fight
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20056?11228

     The Sprint Nextel combination's legal battles with resellers
     continues to fester, and the merged company says it will fight an
     Illinois federal court decision ordering it to divest select
     Midwest wireless operations within 180 days.  The wireless
     carrier will seek a stay and an appeal of the divestiture ruling
     by Judge Thomas ...

Dutch Treat: Netherlands Gov't Exits Telecom
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/105/20052?11228

     The Dutch government has become the latest legislative body to
     get entirely out of telecommunications, this morning selling off
     its last 8-percent stake in incumbent carrier Royal KPN NV and
     pocketing $2.7 billion.  The cash is to be used to reduce the
     national debt.  Elimination of the government's ownership of
     any part of ...

Sprint Pushes Dualmode Talk Button
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20050?11228

     Sprint Nextel Corp. is gearing up to launch its first dualmode
     CDMA/iDEN cellphones soon, according to a Sprint VP. The devices
     could be particularly useful to enterprise users that have long
     depended on the reliability and range of the walkie-talkie-like
     push-to-talk (PTT) service on the iDEN network.  Sprint Nextel
     first ...

Vendors Unite for IMS Pitch
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20048?11228

     Cisco Systems Inc., Nokia Corp., and Siemens Communications Group
     are working together to bid for a monster IMS (IP Multimedia
     Subsystem) engagement at France Telecom SA, according to industry
     sources.  The vendors have formed a consortium to respond to a
     wide-ranging RFQ (request for quotation) from France Telecom that
     covers...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: whoward@login3.srv.ualberta.ca (W Howard)
Subject: Re: Headset Hack
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:27:07 UTC
Organization: University of Alberta


In article <telecom25.342.5@telecom-digest.org>,
BrianEWilliams  <sorry_no_email@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I am addicted to my telephone headset, and I like using a corded phone
> for the sound quality and privacy.  Caller ID is a must, and phones
> that have all these features (headsets, wired, and Caller ID) tend to
> be more expensive business models.

> This is the hack I thought of to let me use a cheap Wal*Mart wired
> phone with a headset.  Simply wire a connection between the coiled
> handset cord and my headset.  There are 4 connectors on the coiled
> handset cord, one for talking, one for listening, and a ground each.

That "ground" is a return current path, but may not be at ground
potential.  There is a reason, at least sometimes, why the mike and
speaker do not share their "ground" wire.

> My headset has a 1/8" male stereo jack at the end.  The part furtherst
> from the tip would take both the ground wires, and then I just have to
> find which is the mike, and which is the earpiece.

Is there a reason why you don't want to remove the stereo jack and
replace it with a 4P4C modular plug like the telephone handset uses?

> Then I have to find out what the 4 wires in the coiled handset cord
> are and connect them correctly.  Is there any reason this won't work?

The speaker part will probably work fine.  The microphone part may be
more troublesome if the mike in the headset is a different type than
the one in the original handset.  You could wind up losing all the
voice quality that was one of your original objectives.

>> Walt

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds
Date: 25 Sep 2006 20:22:18 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


mc  <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> wrote:
>  Martha Mendoza <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote in message: 

>> _When federal agents raided Free Radio Santa Cruz in 2004, a crowd of
>> several hundred protesters soon gathered at the 10-year-old broadcast
>> center -- including the mayor, who was shouting through a bullhorn. The
>> tires on the FCC agents' cars were slashed before they could leave, and
>> then they received parking tickets before they could repair them.

> Is Santa Cruz trying to secede from the United States, then?  And even
> from the International Telecommunications Union?

The argument made by the mayor is that since the station is only
audible from within a small area that is entirely within the state,
the FCC, which holds its power by virtue of the Constitution's clause
enabling the government to regulate interstate commerce, cannot have
jurisdiction.

This argument has been tried before and not found to hold up in court.
But it IS interesting to see that enough people are annoyed about the
lack of community radio in this country to do something about it.

For years there was a 10W class-D allocation for educational stations,
which was very popular and widely used.  It went away in 1978.  More
recently the FCC has, due to demand, opened up low power FM
allocations.  However, because the bands today are so crowded, it's
difficult to shoehorn those LPFM stations in-between existing station
contours.  And for better or for worse, a large proportion of the LPFM
licenses have been bought up by Christian broadcasters, most of them
members of a small number of networks.

> I don't think any of these "rebels" realize is that the only reason
> they *have* clear channels to transmit on is that the FCC regulates
> radio.  If there were no regulation, competitors would be free to jam
> each other and would do so.

I've seen this in some countries, and it has good and bad points.
Tune across the dial in Italy some time ...


scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds
From: Mark Atwood <me@mark.atwood.name>
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:09:50 GMT


mc <look@www.ai.uga.edu.for.address> writes:

> I don't think any of these "rebels" realize is that the only reason
> they *have* clear channels to transmit on is that the FCC regulates
> radio.  If there were no regulation, competitors would be free to jam
> each other and would do so.

Maybe it's time for digital ultra wide band, and software radios, then.

The current modality is like saying the someone has a monopoly on a
particuluar color of light in a given city.  If eyes were stupid and
non-directional, it makes sense.  If they are not, it doesn't.

It no longer makes sense.


Mark Atwood                 When you do things right, people won't be sure
me@mark.atwood.name         you've done anything at all.
http://mark.atwood.name/   http://fallenpegasus.livejournal.com/

------------------------------

From: harold@hallikainen.com <harold@hallikainen.com>
Subject: Re: Pirate Radio Stations Challenge Feds
Date: 26 Sep 2006 05:28:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


mc wrote:

> I'd be inclined to favor an easy licensing system for very-low-power
> stations, subject only to the condition that each one originates its
> own programming and does not simply relay something else.

For some more thoughts on spectrum usage, including a provision for
"public parks," see http://www.hallikainen.org/ijclp .

Harold

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:07:34 PDT
From: Mr Joseph Singer <joeofseattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them


Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:22:33 -0500 Brian Bergstein, AP
<ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote:

> By BRIAN BERGSTEIN, AP Technology Writer

> A hallmark of "Mission: Impossible" was the message that would
> self-destruct after a spy played it. Now a startup communications
> company promises that same level of secrecy with a Web-based messaging
> system designed to leave no traces.

Perfect!  This is what spammers have prayed for!

------------------------------

From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com>
Subject: Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:01:43 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


Brian Bergstein wrote:

> By BRIAN BERGSTEIN, AP Technology Writer [...] The individual
> messages cannot be copied or pasted into other programs.

Oh, really?  I'd like to see some justification for this.  Personally,
I believe pretty strongly I can copy and paste what's on my computer
screen anywhere I choose.

But then, I'm not running Windows.


George Mitchell

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #344
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Tue Sep 26 17:09:54 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 5973221FD; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #345
Message-Id: <20060926210954.5973221FD@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:12:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 345

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Ebbers Surrenders to Prison Officials (Andrew Dunn)
    Not the Happiest Day of His Life (MSNBC News Wire)
    Did The "System" Work Correctly, or Not? (Doug Simpson, AP)
    Three Year Old Child 'Buys' a Pink Convertible on E-Bay (Reuters News)
    Google to Keep Focus on Web Search (Reuters News Wire)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:05:20 -0500
From: Andrew Dunn  <bloomberg@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Ebbers Surrenders to Prison Officials


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: About the time the last issue of the
Digest was being distributed, word came through that Bernie Ebbers
had surrendered to prison officials. This was a major item on
our various news wires, and I am printing three versions of the
event, since they differ slightly in their reports.  PAT]

WorldCom's Ebbers Reports to Louisiana Prison for 25-Year Term

By Andrew Dunn

Sept. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Former WorldCom Inc. Chief Executive Officer
Bernard Ebbers, convicted of overseeing one of the biggest frauds in
U.S. history, reported to a federal prison in Louisiana today to begin
serving a 25-year term.

Officials at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons confirmed that Ebbers, 65, had
reported to the Federal Correctional Institution in Oakdale,
Louisiana, this afternoon. Oakdale, a low-security prison housing
about 1,400 male inmates, is 230 miles from Ebbers's home in Jackson,
Mississippi.

Ebbers, who built a small telephone company into the second-largest
U.S.  long-distance provider, was convicted last year of directing an
$11 billion fraud that drove WorldCom into bankruptcy in July 2002. He
was ordered by U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones in New York to report
to prison by 2 p.m. today.

Ebbers was convicted of conspiracy, securities fraud and seven counts
of making false filings to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. A federal appeals court in New York upheld his conviction
in July.

Ebbers has been free on bail and living at his home in Mississippi
since he was sentenced in July 2005.

At the sentencing, defense lawyers asked Jones to recommend that
Ebbers be allowed to serve his time in the federal prison complex in
Yazoo City, Mississippi. Yazoo City has a minimum security prison camp
and a medium security facility, both for men.

Briefed Ebbers

The government's star witness at Ebbers's trial, former WorldCom Chief
Financial Officer Scott Sullivan, testified that he briefed his boss
on efforts to hide costs at WorldCom and inflate revenue. Sullivan
pleaded guilty and is serving a five- year prison term at a federal
prison complex in Jesup, Georgia.

WorldCom filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history after Ebbers was
ousted as CEO. It emerged from bankruptcy as MCI Inc. and moved from
Clinton, Mississippi to Ashburn, Virginia. New York-based Verizon
Communications Inc. later acquired MCI.

Ebbers last year agreed to pay as much as $45 million -- almost all
his assets -- to help settle claims in related civil suits. He and his
wife were left with about $50,000 and a 'modest' home in Jackson,
Mississippi, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said.

The case is U.S. v. Ebbers, 02-CR-1144, U.S. District Court, Southern 
District of New York.

To contact the reporter on this story: David Glovin in New York at
dglovin@bloomberg.net ; Andrew Dunn in New York at adunn8@bloomberg.net

Copyright 2006 Bloomberg.net

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:10:10 -0500
From: MSNBC.com NewsWire <msnbc@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Not the Happiest Day of His Life


 From MSNBC.com

Ex-WorldCom CEO checks in for prison term
Bernard Ebbers sentenced to 25 years for role in the accounting fraud
The Associated Press


Updated: 1:51 p.m. CT Sept 26, 2006

JACKSON, Miss. - Former WorldCom chief Bernard Ebbers drove through
the gates of a federal prison Tuesday to begin a 25-year sentence for
his role in the $11 billion accounting fraud that toppled a company he
built from a tiny telecommunications firm to an industry giant.

Behind the wheel of a Mercedes he had driven from his home, Ebbers
pulled the bill of his cap down, shielding his face from reporters and
photographers, as he drove into the prison.

Ebbers left his upscale, brick-and-stucco home in a gated community in
the Jackson suburb of Ridgeland about 9 a.m. EDT and arrived shortly
after 2 p.m. at Oakdale.

At his home on Monday, he had refused to answer any questions and told
an Associated Press reporter to leave.

"You're not even supposed to be on this property," said Ebbers, 65, who 
answered the door wearing a light blue golf shirt and blue jeans.

Ebbers walked outside, with a cigar in his mouth, to watch the
reporter leave his property.

Ebbers, a former high school basketball coach, took a small
telecommunications firm and transformed it into an industry giant
before the Clinton, Miss.-based WorldCom collapsed in bankruptcy in
2002.

"My overall sense of it is it's just a sad day," said Clinton Mayor 
Rosemary Aultman, whose city had to deal with the economic fallout of 
the scandal. "The collapse of WorldCom was a tragic ending to what had 
been a fabulous story. So I think the overwhelming emotion continues to 
be great sadness and disappointment."

U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones of New York told Ebbers during a 
sentencing hearing in July 2005 that she would recommend Ebbers be 
assigned to the Yazoo City Federal Correctional Facility -- about 50 
miles northwest of Jackson -- to make it easier for his family to visit 
him. But the recommendation was not followed.

"It's a decision of the (prison) bureau," said Mike Truman, a U.S. 
Bureau of Prisons spokesman in Washington.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Ebbers' conviction and
sentence last month. His attorney has said they will continue to
appeal, but he has few options, said Ron Rychlak, associate dean of
the University of Mississippi School of Law.

"I understand they're going to ask the 2nd Circuit to reconsider the 
case on whole. Three judges heard the case against him originally and he 
could ask all the judges on the court to hear the case," Rychlak said. 
"It's pretty rare. The other thing would be to ask the Supreme Court to 
hear the case. That also is a very rarely granted situation."

Ebbers' attorney, Reid Weingarten, did not immediately respond to a 
message left at his Washington office on Monday.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:17:12 -0500
From: Doug Simpson, AP <ap@telecom-digeet.org> 
Subject: Did The "System" Work Correctly, or Not?


Ex-WorldCom CEO Ebbers reports to prison
By DOUG SIMPSON Associated Press Writer
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press

OAKDALE, La. -- Former WorldCom Corp. chief Bernard Ebbers drove through 
the gates of a federal prison Tuesday to begin a 25-year federal prison 
sentence on Tuesday for his role in the $11 billion accounting fraud 
that toppled a company he built from a tiny telecommunications firm to 
an industry giant.

Behind the wheel of a Mercedes he had driven from Mississippi, Ebbers
pulled the bill of his cap down, shielding his face from reporters and
photographers, as he drove into the prison.

Ebbers left his upscale, brick-and-stucco home in a gated community in
the Jackson suburb of Ridgeland about 8 a.m. Tuesday. He arrived
shortly after 1 p.m. at Oakdale.

At his home, he had refused to answer any questions and told an 
Associated Press reporter to leave.

"You're not even supposed to be on this property," said Ebbers, 65, who 
answered the door wearing a light blue golf shirt and blue jeans.

Ebbers walked outside, with a cigar in his mouth, to watch the
reporter leave his property.

Ebbers, a former high school basketball coach, took a small
telecommunications firm and transformed it into an industry giant
before the Clinton, Miss.-based WorldCom collapsed in bankruptcy in
2002.

"My overall sense of it is it's just a sad day," said Clinton Mayor 
Rosemary Aultman, whose city dealt with the economic fallout of the 
scandal. "The collapse of WorldCom was a tragic ending to what had been 
a fabulous story. So I think the overwhelming emotion continues to be 
great sadness and disappointment."

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Ebbers' conviction and 
sentence last month. His attorney has said they will continue to appeal, 
but he has few options, said Ron Rychlak, associate dean of the 
University of Mississippi School of Law.

"I understand they're going to ask the 2nd Circuit to reconsider the 
case on whole. Three judges heard the case against him originally and he 
could ask all the judges on the court to hear the case," Rychlak said. 
"It's pretty rare. The other thing would be to ask the Supreme Court to 
hear the case. That also is a very rarely granted situation."

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com
Section: Business news

This article is: 
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/4215658.html

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html  (and also)
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra.newstoday.html (and also)
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well, did the justice system in America
work the way it should in this case?  If you take his present age of
65, add a 25 year sentence to that, he will get out of prison at the
age of 90, if he lives that long, which is quite doubtful. An almost
'untouchable' man five years ago, and quite powerful, Ebbers has now
been brought down, although I am not sure it was entirely his fault.
Given the dishonest sales tactics of so many people telemarketing MCI
service over the years, I imagine a lot of them are today thanking
and praising God that _they_ were not selected instead of or in 
addition to Ebbers.  He said several times at his trial that he mostly
was a 'rubber stamp' on actions taken by his employees.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:52:08 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Three Year Old Child 'Buys' a Pink Convertible on E-Bay


Jack Neal briefly became the proud owner of a pink convertible car
after he managed to buy it for 9,000 pounds ($17,000) on the Internet
despite being only three years old.

Jack's mother told the BBC she had left her password for the eBay
auction site in her computer and her son used the "buy it now" option
to complete the purchase.

"Jack's a whiz on the PC and just pressed all the right buttons,"
Rachel Neal said.

The seller of the second-hand car, a dealer from Worcestershire,
central England, was amused by the bid and agreed not to force the
sale through.

"Luckily he saw the funny side and said he would re-advertise," Neal said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:53:58 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Google to Keep Focus on Web Search


Google Inc. (Nasdaq:GOOG - news) is unlikely to make any major
investments in original content, choosing instead to keep its focus on
Internet search, a top executive from the Web powerhouse said on
Tuesday.

Tim Armstrong, vice president of advertising sales, said Google viewed
itself "as an operator of the Web" rather than a company that would
produce original text, films or images.

"We don't really have a ton of serious conversations about creating
content," Armstrong said during a panel discussion at an Interactive
Advertising Bureau event in New York. Instead, he said, Google would
prefer to stick with "getting users where they want to go."

Another Web media company, Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - news), has shown
more interest in moving into original programming, ranging from news
to columns.

But even Yahoo executives have repeatedly said they do not intend to
recreate television on the Web, envisioning instead a new
entertainment venue that plays up the interactivity of the Internet.

Meanwhile, speaking on the same panel, Yahoo Executive Vice President
of Global Media Sales Greg Coleman said concerns about a slowdown in
Internet advertising could be overblown.

"People can use the word slowdown, but it gets taken out of context,"
he said, pointing out that many of the largest 200 companies are still
increasing their advertising on the Web, often from relatively low

"We don't see a slowdown in that activity whatsoever," he said. Yahoo
recently warned that financial and auto advertising had eased off.

Another executive, Michael Kelly, president of AOL Media Networks
(NYSE:TWX - news), said he saw no deceleration in advertising.

"I don't think there is an industry slowdown," Kelly said. "Think
about how many more sales forces are out on the streets today."

In a report this week, research firm eMarketer forecast online ad
spending will rise 26.8 percent this year to $15.9 billion, marking a
slowdown from rates of 30 percent and above in the past two years.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #345
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Wed Sep 27 15:40:59 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 4008E226C; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #346
Message-Id: <20060927194059.4008E226C@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:45:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 346

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Microsoft Offers Explorer Patch Ahead of Schedule (Reuters News Wire)
    ING Direct Solves Internet Banking Riddle (Reed Stevenson, Reuters)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 26, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 27, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Telecom-themed Bob Dylan Show on XM Satellite Radio (Paul W. Schleck)
    Verizon: FiOS to Generate Operating Profit (USTelecom dailyLead)
    Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them (Barry Margolin)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:59:41 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Microsoft Offers Explorer Patch Ahead of Schedule


Microsoft Corp. on Tuesday released a security patch to fix a
"critical" hole in its Internet Explorer Web browser that the world's
biggest software maker said could allow an attacker to take control of
a user's computer.

The patch was released two weeks ahead of a regularly scheduled
monthly security update after Microsoft said it became aware of a
"public attack utilizing the vulnerability." The company added that
the impact on customers was "limited."

Microsoft typically issues security patches at the beginning of the
month.

The flaw rated at critical -- the highest level -- exists in the
coding for Vector Markup Language, or VML.

The company defines a flaw as "critical" when the vulnerability could
allow a damaging Internet worm to replicate without the user doing
anything to the machine.

The company has been working for more than three years to improve the
security and reliability of its software as more and more malicious
attacks target weaknesses in Windows and other Microsoft software.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:02:07 -0500
From: Reed Stevenson <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: ING Direct Solves Internet Banking Riddle


By Reed Stevenson

As more and more people turn to the Internet to pay bills and shop for
goods and services, Dutch financial services group ING has carved out
a lead in what was once considered the most elusive of online
services: banking.

ING Direct, the Internet banking arm of ING that operates in nine
countries, is by far the world's largest online bank, boasting nearly
17 million customers and about 200 billion euros ($253.5 billion) of
savings deposits.

In every country that ING Direct operates -- Canada, Spain, Australia,
France, the United States, Italy, Britain and Germany -- it is the
No. 1 online bank.

"For ING Group, it is one of its main growth engines," Dick Harryvan,
the ING executive board member responsible for ING Direct, said in an
interview. "Today we are approximately 30 percent of the balance sheet
of the bank."

ING Direct has become such a key driver of the bank's earnings --
profit grew 41 percent in the first half of 2006 to 359 million euros
 -- that investors are also beginning to focus more closely on its
strategy and direction.

Key questions include how quickly ING Direct will expand its product
offerings in countries where it operates, and what new markets it may
enter. Although ING Direct doesn't operate in its home market to avoid
cannibalizing a decades-old retail network, it is eyeing new markets,
most notably Japan.

"The advantage they have in terms of costs is significant," said
Duncan Russell, an analyst at Fox-Pitt, Kelton Ltd. "They're also
offering better products than their competitors."

According to ING's own data, ING Direct's operational costs excluding
marketing are a fifth of that of a traditional bank branch. Investors
have bid up ING's shares -- they're up 36 percent his year and are
trading at 10.4 times projected 2006 earnings, compared with 9.7 for
nearest rival ABN AMRO.

Instead of a branch network, ING Direct relies on computers servers
humming in data centers to run its online bank, where customers can
sign up, authenticate and manage their accounts online. Apart from
management and technology staff, ING Direct has call support staff and
a few retail "cafes" for promotion.

Typically, ING Direct will enter a country by only offering an online
savings account with an attractive interest rate. After attracting
customers, the online bank then expands it product offerings into
areas such as term deposits, mortgages, mutual funds and loans.

In select countries, ING Direct also offers insurance, pension and 
checking account services.

Despite ING Direct's impressive growth -- deposits grew a hundred-fold
from 2 billion euros in 1999 -- Harryvan said that consultants told
ING that its chances of success were slim when it launched its first
pilot in Canada in 1997.

"McKinsey told us it wouldn't work," Harryvan said.

WHERE NEXT?

Ironically, few consumers in the Benelux have heard of ING Direct,
which has built its brand in the United States, Britain and other
markets with its splashy, orange-themed advertising.

Despite being headquartered in the Netherlands, Harryvan said that ING
Direct had no plans to enter its home market or neighboring Belgium.

The main criteria for ING Direct when it enters new markets is a high
Internet usage rate, a high savings rate or a willingness to move
money between accounts.

"We think in a market there should at least be 100 billion euros in 
savings," Harryvan said.

As a result, the most potentially viable new markets are Japan, South
Korea, The Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and Sweden, said
Fox-Pitts' Russell.

"Japan for us is the biggest strategic decision in terms of moving
forward," Harryvan said, "We have researched the Japanese market
already four years ago and to be frank we have a team on the ground
there looking at the whole market."

Indeed, most analysts see Japan as an inevitable next step for ING
Direct, with its high savings rate, a developed inter-bank payments
system and a recovering economy with depositors hungry for returns
after a decade of near-zero interest rates.

The world's second-largest economy has already experimented with
online banking. Largest is eBank with 1.65 million customers and even
consumer electronics group Sony has an online bank. Among foreign
entrants, Citigroup unit Citibank also offers Internet banking.

In a country of 128 million people and nearly 7 trillion euros in
deposits -- the opportunities in Japan are huge, even despite the
risks.

"We know that Japanese consumers are absolutely brutal when it comes
to quality. You've got the get it right the first time," Harryvan
said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 26, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:03:58 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 26, 2006
********************************

Vivendi Bids US$3.2 bil. for Deutsche Telekom's PTC Stake
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20100?11228

     French media and energy conglomerate Vivendi Universal has made a
     2.5 billion-euro bid for Deutsche Telekom's 49% stake in Poland's
     leading mobile operator. In addition, Vivendi claims its rights to a
     48% stake in PTC, though its investment in 51% of Elektrim's telecoms
     investment vehicle, Elektrim Telekomunikacja (ET) ...

Nortel to Provide Vidotron with Cable VoIP Solution
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20095?11228

     Nortel has won another contract in Canada with the announcement
     that it is to supply the VoIP solution for Quebec cable
     TV/multi-service operator (MSO) Vidotron. The multi-year contract
     includes systems, deployment, and implementation, plus ongoing
     services including technical support, disaster recovery. and
     repair ...

RingCube Software Squeezes PC Onto iPod
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20092?11228

     Mobile computing just got more portable. Making even the latest
     pocketbook-sized ultra-mobile personal computers look more like
     lumbering giants, RingCube Technologies Inc. unveiled software
     that can virtually squeeze a PC onto an iPod, USB keychain drive,
     cell phone or any gizmo with digital storage space.
     RingCube's MojoPac ...

Microsoft Spinoff Wallop Launches Test
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20090?11228

     SEATTLE -- Wallop, a startup spun out of Microsoft Corp.'s
     research lab, is launching the test version of an online social
     networking site with the premise that people will want to pay
     extra to look good.  The company, which aims to compete with
     established brands like MySpace and Facebook, plans to sell
     graphics and other ...

Savvy Marketers Using Text Messaging
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20087?11228

     CHICAGO -- Like any normal consumer, Tom Gruss was leery about
     to his cell phone. Who needs a bombardment of sales pitches in
     yet another format?  But he found one offering a heads-up about
     changing gasoline prices at Meijer Inc. stores benign enough to
     sign up, ...

FCC Ponders Market Conditions While Congress Chases Pretexting
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20081?11228

     Busy, busy in the nation's Capital this week, with the Federal
     Communications Commission (FCC) holding its monthly open meeting
     and the House of Representatives set to grill the industry on
     pretexting.  Tomorrow, the FCC will consider items regarding
     competitive market conditions with respect to commercial mobile
     services, an ...

Orange Peels Convergence
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20078?11228

     European mobile giant Orange SA's entry into the fixed/mobile
     convergence market is the big news in today's technology
     round-up, while meshed video, Swedish WiFi sniffing tools, and a WiFi
     pizza patent duke it out for also-ran glory. Orange Converged:
     Despite sounding like a Philip K. Dick novel, 'Unik' is
     actually ...

Motorola Buys Vertasent
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20074?11228

     Continuing on its year-long acquisition binge, Motorola
     Inc. checked off another item on its video shopping list Monday,
     buying switched digital video specialist Vertasent LLC for an
     undisclosed amount. The purchase of Vertasent, a tiny, privately
     owned company based in Colmar, Pa., gives Motorola the rights to
     the software ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 27, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:58:02 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 27, 2006
********************************

Sony Ericsson P990i Pushes the (Pay) Envelope
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20126?11228

     A cell phone that sells for about $1K ought to have some pretty
     impressive features, and the Sony Eriksson P990i certainly
     does. With goodies like a 2-megapixel camera, a flip-down QWERTY
     keyboard, a business card scanner and support for both 3G/UMTS
     and Wi-Fi networks, the smart phone ranks near the top of the
     coolness -- and ...

Telecom Italia Shelves Plan to Sell Mobile Unit, Signs Deal with Sony
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20121?11228

     Embattled Telecom Italia has affirmed that there are no plans to
     sell any of its assets, including the contentious mobile unit
     Telecom Italia Mobile (TIM), although the fixed and mobile units
     would still be split. Speaking at a hearing convened by the
     Italian market regulator, Consob, new Telecom Italia chairman
     Guido Rossi said that ...

3 Ireland Gets DVB-H Mobile TV Licence
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20119?11228

     Hutchison Whampoa's 3 Ireland unit has won a preliminary licence
     from Ireland's telecoms regulator, ComReg, to trial mobile TV
     services using a digital video broadcasting handheld (DVB-H)
     platform. The trials follow the success of 3 Ireland's range of
     TV content, including highlights from English Premiership soccer
     matches ...

Music Services and Phones Sing Nokia's Song
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20116?11228

     NEW YORK -- Nokia has turned up the volume on its mobile music
     plans. At its Open Studio press event today, the Finnish handset
     manufacturer unveiled two new music-focused handsets and several
     accessories. More importantly, though, it talked about its vision
     for providing music services. As an outgrowth of its acquisition
     of ...

Insider: Trio Takes DR to Next Level
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20111?11228

     A technology trio could revolutionize disaster recovery for enterprise
     storage managers.  According to the latest Byte and Switch
     Insider, the standard methods of disaster recovery -- replication,
     mirroring, and archiving -- aren't cutting it anymore. It is
     simply too costly, time consuming, and complicated to apply these
     ...

Symbol's Dunkin' Devices
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20108?11228

     Wireless enterprise device maker Symbol Technologies
     Inc.&nbsp;was in New York City today to show off a slate of new
     ruggedized products just a week after the firm said that Motorola
     Inc.&nbsp;plans to buy it for $3.9 billion in cash. The
     No. 2 enterprise WiFi player had a new outdoor 802.11 mesh box on
     show as well as an ...

Lucent Stretches 100-GigE
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20106?11228

     Bell Labs, which has made a hobby out of 100-Gbit/s Ethernet
     lately, has presented lab results that claim serial 100-Gbit/s
     transmission across a 2,000km distance.  Bell Labs parent Lucent
     Technologies Inc.&nbsp;divulged the results earlier today at the
     European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication
     (ECOC) in a paper ...

Asia Pacific Leading Metro Ethernet Services Market
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20103?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- Asia Pacific (APAC) is leading the market
     adoption of metro Ethernet services, as Japan and South Korea
     companies are entering the mass adoption stage, reports
     In-Stat. The APAC market registered 0.632 million business metro
     Ethernet service subscribers in 2005, the high-tech market
     research firm says. Most of ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>

Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@novia.net>
Subject: Telecom-Themed Bob Dylan Show on XM Satellite Radio
Date: 27 Sep 2006 10:24:02 -0500
Organization: Novia Internetworking, http://www.novia.net/


Today's (Wednesday, September 27th) episode of Bob Dylan's "Theme Time
Radio Hour" on XM Satellite Radio Channel 40, "Deep Tracks," featured
songs with telephone related themes, including "Party Line" by the
Kinks, and "Your Wires Have Been Tapped" by Dewey "Pigmeat" Markham.

More information about the show, and a schedule of encore
presentations for this episode, may be obtained from:

http://www.xmradio.com/bobdylan/

(I have no personal or direct financial stake in XM Satellite Radio
beyond that of a happy subscriber since 2003.)


Paul W. Schleck
pschleck@novia.net
http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger pschleck@novia.net for PGP Public Key

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:42:23 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Verizon: FiOS to Generate Operating Profit


Go to http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eylAfDtusXdjavApRg

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Verizon: FiOS to generate operating profit by '09
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* IBM launches IP telephony service for businesses
* Analysis: Qwest on more solid footing
* Vodafone to bow self-branded handset
* Palm faces competitive pressure from new rivals
* U.K. cable operator NTL rolls out quadruple-play offering
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* Asset Management in the Telecommunications Converged Environment
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* New York Times special report: Networking
* MSN teams with Control Room for live concerts
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* FCC approves compromise kids-TV rules
DIVERSIONS
* What You Get for ... $4 Million
* New York Uncorked
* Another Way to Screen Calls: Color ID
* The Place: Los Angeles
* Wireless Networking May Soon Get Faster. Will Anyone Care?

------------------------------

From: Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Mesages That Go 'Poof' After Sending Them
Organization: Symantec
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:17:36 -0400


In article <telecom25.344.10@telecom-digest.org>, Mr Joseph Singer
<joeofseattle@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:22:33 -0500 Brian Bergstein, AP
> <ap@telecom-digest.org> wrote:

> By BRIAN BERGSTEIN, AP Technology Writer

>> A hallmark of "Mission: Impossible" was the message that would
>> self-destruct after a spy played it. Now a startup communications
>> company promises that same level of secrecy with a Web-based messaging
>> system designed to leave no traces.

> Perfect!  This is what spammers have prayed for!

Did you actually read the rest of the article?  It's a chat system that 
doesn't record the conversation, not an email mechanism.

Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #346
******************************
    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Thu Sep 28 15:32:08 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id CFBA42237; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:32:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #347
Message-Id: <20060928193207.CFBA42237@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:32:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 28 Sep 2006 5:35:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 347

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Judge Rules Against Morpheus File Sharing (Reuters News Wire)
    PayPal Makes Settlement Deal With 28 States (Reuters News Wire)
    Microsoft Sues Unknown Hacker (Reuters News Wire)
    Apple Co-Founder Tells His Side of the Story (Eddie Evans)
    New Tech Toys Displayed at DEMOfall Show (May Wong, AP)
    Verizon on Track With FiOS Goals (USTelecom dailyLead)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 28, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: Headset Hack (BrianEWilliams)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:25:10 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Judge Rules Against Morpheus File Sharing


In a victory for the entertainment industry, a federal judge has ruled
that the Morpheus file-sharing software encourages millions of users
to share music, movies and other works without authorization.

U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson ruled on Wednesday that StreamCast
Networks Inc., the distributor of Morpheus, had contributed to massive
copyright infringement because it had constructed a business model
that relied on massive copyright infringement and did not attempt to
block the trading of copyrighted materials.

The case, pitting Hollywood movie studios, record companies and music 
publishers against StreamCast and similar firms, dated back to 2001. 
Last year, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision, ruling that 
some technology firms could be held liable for distributing software 
used to violate copyrights.

StreamCast, based in Woodland Hills, California, said it was
considering an appeal and maintained that it did not encourage users
to infringe on copyrighted works and never intended to do so.

"The court's ruling is disappointing. StreamCast will consider its
options, including appealing the decision," the company said in a
statement.

"Morpheus is an innovative, multiuse program with legal uses that are
overwhelming. In the meantime, Morpheus will continue to discourage
users from infringing upon copyrighted works," the company said.

StreamCast was the only file-sharing company that continued fighting
after the Supreme Court ruling.

"This is an especially gratifying marker in the continuing
transformation of the online music marketplace," said Mitch Bainwol,
chairman and chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of
America, the trade group for major record companies like Warner Music
Group and Vivendi's Universal Music Group.

"No single court ruling solves piracy or can make up for several
challenging years for the music community, but there's no doubt that
this particularly important decision means that the rules of the road
for online music are better today than they were yesterday," he said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newdtoday.html

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You know, if Hollywood and the
entertainment industry are going to go after _every possible_ way
of copying files simply to protect their precious movies and music
 from _possibly being copied_ 'illegally', then why have they not
yet started hassling the writers of FTP and its later, more modern
variations?  How much longer will we be 'allowed' to use FTP to
copy legitimate files?  Really the question should be, how much
longer will Hollywood and entertainment/music be allowed to hang
around on the net, dictating the terms to the rest of us?  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:27:57 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: PayPal Makes Settlement Deal With 28 States


EBay Inc.'s (Nasdaq:EBAY - news) online payments unit, PayPal, has
signed an agreement with attorneys general from 28 U.S. states to
clarify how it notifies consumers of the measures it takes to protect
their financial data, the company said on Thursday.

Under the deal, PayPal will pay $1.7 million to the states.

PayPal said it will, among other things, shorten and streamline its
user agreement and communicate more information relating to its
protection programs. The company said it has already complied with
many of the voluntary deal's terms.

PayPal also said it reached a settlement in a proposed class action
lawsuit by PayPal customers in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn. The
company agreed to set up a settlement fund of $3.5 million, less court
and attorneys fees.

Under the terms of the settlement deals, PayPal is not admitting any
liability for any of the allegations in the two cases, PayPal said.

The state attorneys general involved in the deal represent Alabama,
Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia.

The federal lawsuit was filed in 2005 on behalf of a class alleging
that PayPal did not clearly communicate information about its consumer
protection programs related to specific types of transactions.

The legal settlement will be presented for preliminary approval to the
U.S. District Court in the coming months.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:26:42 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Microsoft Sues Unknown Hacker


Microsoft Corp. has sued an anonymous computer hacker whose free
program allows users to copy digital movies and songs by bypassing a
software protection built into the company's Media player.

The world's biggest software maker charges the hacker known as
"Viodentia" has illegally obtained propriety source code to produce
the program called FairUse4WM, sparking fears it could enable
consumers to illegally copy digital content.

The program's name is a reference to legal rulings in which courts
recognize "fair use" as the ability for consumers to copy recordings
for personal use. Some consumer advocates argue that the digital media
industry is ignoring that right in its attempt to stop illegal
duplication.

The lawsuit marks the company's latest attempt to stop the programmer,
who has repeatedly released updates to the program in response to
Microsoft patches aimed at stopping the tool that strips away digital
management rights code.

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction as well as unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages.

"This software program enables users to alter or remove Microsoft's
DRM from Windows Media files (i.e. it allows users to wrongfully
access or copy a copyrighted music or movie file," the company said in
its lawsuit filed in U.S. District Use in Seattle.

But a person using the identity Viodentia said in a Web posting the
program has never involved Microsoft source code. The programmer also
said in an online interview with Engadget that the lawsuit was a
"fishing expedition to get identity information" in a bid to bring
more lawsuits.

Microsoft could not immediately be reached for comment, but one legal
expert viewed the lawsuit as a way for the company to slow
distribution of the program and scare would-be users from taking
advantage of it to duplicate copyrighted content.

Allonn Levy, an attorney specializing in intellectual property on the
Internet, said the program also highlights major problem facing
content providers and software makers such as Microsoft as consumer
demand grows for Web delivery of content such as movies and music.

"It shows that whomever is producing the DRM, even if it is the
biggest software maker in the world, they are going to have to
continually update and change that DRM because it is going to be
cracked," Levy said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:30:55 -0500
From: Eddie Evans <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Apple Co-Founder Tells His Side of the Story


by Eddie Evans

There was excited chatter as the revolutionaries met in a nondescript
garage in Menlo Park, California, but in the beginning few of them
really knew how they would change the world.

And yet within a year of that first meeting of the Homebrew Computer
Club on March 5, 1975, a computer was in the hands of consumers for
just a few hundred dollars and the personal computer revolution was
under way.

Steve Wozniak says that meeting inspired him to design and build the
first Apple computer, but he almost didn't show up. "I was shy and
felt that I knew little about the newest developments in computers,"
he recalls.

Shyness is a theme for Wozniak. He is "the other Steve" in the duo
behind Apple Computer Inc. (Nasdaq:AAPL - news), the self-effacing
engineer to Steve Jobs' brash marketing whiz.

While Jobs, now presiding over the success of Apple's iPod, is almost
a household name, the other Steve has been content to stay out of the
limelight, until now.

In a book titled "iWoz" published this week, Wozniak seeks to tell the
engineer's side of the story and set a few things in the record
straight.

For him, the day that defined the personal computer was June 29, 1975,
the first time he typed a character on a keyboard and saw it show up
on the screen right in front of him.

"Every computer before the 'Apple I' had that front panel of switches
and lights. Every computer since has had a keyboard and a screen," he
writes.

TELLING HIS STORY

Wozniak, variously known as "Woz" and the "Wizard of Woz," put
together circuit boards for what would be called the Apple I, and Jobs
sold them for $500 each to a new computer store, the Byte Shop in
Mountain View, California.

"There are stories that Steve (Jobs) and I engineered those first
computers together," he writes. "I did them alone."

By 1977, the pair had introduced the Apple II, still recognizable as a
personal computer even today, and sold 2 million by the time it was
superseded by the Macintosh.

As Apple grew into a huge company, Wozniak shunned management
positions and worked in a cubicle alongside other engineers, even
though he was a co-founder.

An incident that still grates is the way his departure from Apple in
1985 was reported in the press. The fact that he was unhappy with the
way Apple was going was not a factor, he said, and he left solely so
he could start his own company. He is still on the payroll of Apple
and sometimes represents the company at events.

He also still counts Jobs among his friends, and in an interview said
that any differences between them were very minor and a "little bit
misinterpreted."

But his book tells some choice stories from their long friendship,
including a controversy over a fee for a game called Breakout in the
early days and another incident in which Jobs blocked a design company
from working with Wozniak.

SHARING THE WEALTH

Wozniak also said that Jobs declined to write a foreword for the
book. A spokesman for Apple declined to comment.

The book's title, "iWoz," invites comparison with Jobs, who has
sometimes called himself iCEO since his returned to Apple as interim
CEO in 1997.

Wozniak, a bear of a man at 55, retains the innocence of the computer
nerd who in 1975 was too shy to talk at computer club meetings and who
was happy to share his designs for the early Apple with its members.

In fact, he never seemed to aspire to massive wealth. Along the way,
he has taught at a public school and spent millions of dollars of his
own money to fund rock concerts. And he sold stock cheaply to other
Apple engineers before the company's successful initial public
offering in 1980 so that they could share in the wealth.

 From his experience, he advises today's would-be inventors to avoid
big, structured companies, where there is less leeway to turn clever
ideas into revolutionary new products.

"Yes, a person who is technical, a little bit nerdy, not so social,
can just do some common-sense things and have it work out great," he
said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more tech news of interest, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:33:12 -0500
From: May Wong, AP <ap@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: New Tech Toys Displayed at DEMOfall Show


By MAY WONG, AP Technology Writer

The best technology is often invisible because it's working
efficiently in the background. Fun technology, however, is usually the
stuff you can touch and feel. And when it talks and twirls, that's
even better.

The quirkiest product appearing at this week's DEMOfall 2006
conference, a springboard for tech startups, had rabbit ears  and
not the kind for televisions.

Violet, a small French company, showed off a plastic white bunny named
Nabaztag that connects wirelessly to a home's computer network.

Its ears can twirl or point up or down to notify you of incoming
e-mail or the rise and fall of stocks. It can read e-mails or news
headlines aloud, converting the text to speech. It can announce the
time or play songs from your digital music collection. Color lights
that glow from inside its belly can issue a weather report. All
yellow, for instance, can mean sunny; all blue can mean snow.

The 9-inch-tall rabbit performs according to preferences set up by the
user on Violet's Web site. For instance, you could assign different
light signals for e-mails that come from different people or contain
certain keywords in the subject line.

Nabaztag can even marry another rabbit, and the two can link up over
the Internet. The owners of the pair can instigate some bunny love, or
"ear play," by getting their bunnies to mimic each other's ear
movements.

Nabaztag -- the Armenian word for rabbit -- is dubbed as the first 
wireless rabbit, but it's not the first home information appliance. A 
handful of other companies have introduced -- with mixed success -- an odd 
assortment of similar items, from smart clock radios to the spherical 
Orb lamp by Ambient Devices.

The smart bunny is available for $150 from select online retailers. A
new version that adds a built-in microphone so the owner can give the
rabbit orders will be available in November for $170.

Several other cool gadgets hitting the DEMOfall stage, where nearly 70
companies each had six minutes to show off their products, aimed to
offer relief for road warriors.

Dash Navigation Inc. unveiled the first car navigation device designed
to constantly stay connected to the Internet. The always-connected
feature lets Dash Express do more than the current crop of
satellite-navigation products.

"We can't help you get rid of traffic, but we can tell you where it is 
and how to get around it," said Dash Chief Executive Officer Paul Lego.

The gadget taps cellular and public wireless, or Wi-Fi, signals to
stay linked to the Web, getting the freshest available data on traffic
conditions. It can also do Web searches for locations or products, the
cheapest gas around, or movie times — and then direct you to the
destination.

The device also comes preprogrammed with historical traffic data for
major roads for every time and day of the year, arming visitors then
with a bit of the knowledge of local residents.

But the most powerful feature of Dash Express will happen only if many
of them are out there. Each device sends data back to the Internet to
report the flow of traffic at that point, allowing Dash to gather,
calculate and dispense traffic conditions and alternate routes based
on real-time traffic flow.

Robert Acker, Dash's senior vice president of marketing, said roughly
3,000 units in a metropolitan region will be enough to provide
accurate real-time traffic data for major arteries.

Dash Express is slated to ship early next year. Exact pricing has not
been disclosed, but Acker said the price will be about $600 for the
device with an optional additional monthly service fee for the
Internet-based features.

Another company, Mvox Technologies Inc., showed off its Mvox Duo, a
wearable all-in-one type communicator that is a wireless Bluetooth
headset and speakerphone for cell phones or PCs.

Dressed in a "Star Trek" outfit, Mvox's vice president of marketing,
Sally Li, offered one of the more entertaining presentations at
DEMOfall. She clipped the small headset to her uniform and conducted
several phone calls to "Spock" to highlight its handsfree features.

The gadget, which will be available for $199 in November, allows for
voice dialing and can announce the caller, eliminating the need for
drivers to peek at their cell phones to see who's calling.

At the office, the headset could be plugged into a Bluetooth-enabled
computer or a USB port to support Internet-based phone calls.

The Mvox Duo also has 8-megabytes of built-in memory to store
contacts, so users can retain the information even if they switch to
another Bluetooth cell phone.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more headlines and news from Associated Press, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:50:59 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
Subject: Verizon on Track With FiOS Goals


USTelecom dailyLead
September 28, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eyAcfDtusXdooXgssU

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Verizon on track with FiOS goals
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Mobile ESPN to close down operations
* As Web video craze grows, cable industry boosts VOD offerings
* Major players still have lock on Net profits, AOL chief says
* Neuf Cegetel offers stripped-down PC to lure broadband subscribers
* France Telecom details GPON plans, considers relaxing dark fiber policy
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA and Lawful Intercept Compliance Guide
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Motorola carries mobile WiMAX torch
* SDR technology could bring convergence to wireless
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Commentary: Statewide franchises are good for consumers
* Denver fields Wi-Fi proposals
* Ebbers to appeal fraud conviction to U.S. Supreme Court
DIVERSIONS
* Your Own Private Africa
* He's Got the Salad Covered. Can He Serve You Dinner?
* Dressing Smartphones for Success
* A Finicky Grape Finds New Glory
* Costa Careyes, Mexico: A Pacific Resort Where the Air Kisses Are Understated

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/eyAcfDtusXdooXgssU

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 28, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:55:43 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 28, 2006
********************************

NTL Launches First Quadruple-Play Service in U.K.
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20151?11228

     Cable operator NTL has, as expected, announced the launch of the
     United Kingdom's first 'quadruple-play' package. The service will
     offer digital TV, mobile services, internet access and fixed-line
     telephony, for a monthly charge of 40 pounds (US$75.7).  The move
     is the latest realisation of the potential of the combined ...

Softbank Promises Easy, Free Yahoo! Internet Content on New Mobile
Phones http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20144?11228

     TOKYO -- Japanese Internet services company Softbank, which
     bought British carrier Vodafone's mobile business in Japan
     earlier this year, said Thursday that its new mobile phones will
     offer an easy link to Yahoo! Internet content. Softbank Corp.
     President Masayoshi Son said the carrier will expand the lineup of
     handsets by ...

EU Court Rules Illegal Dutch Government Golden Shares in KPN, Dutch Post
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20141?11228

     BRUSSELS, Belgium -- An EU court on Thursday ruled illegal the
     Dutch government's controlling minority stake in telecom company
     Royal KPN NV and the Dutch Post Office TNT Postgroep NV.  The
     European Court of Justice, the EU's highest court, said the
     government's 'golden shares' -- which gave it ...

Verizon Touts FiOS Momentum; Spending To Top $18B
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20137?11228

     Verizon this morning delivered what could be called a 'state of
     the union' briefing on its FiOS fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) project,
     saying it now expects to spend $18 billion on the program by
     2010, at which time it will have passed 18 million premises with
     its network. In an extensive and mainly upbeat briefing for  ...

Colubris Gets Secure
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20135?11228

     WiFi vendor Colubris Networks Inc. has released a new access
     point aimed at the ever-more-crowded enterprise wireless
     intrusion detection and prevention marketplace. The Waltham,
     Mass.-based company claims that its MAP-330 Integrated Sensor/AP
     is different from the rest because it can operate as a normal
     access point and a security ...

Cable VOIP Gains at Telco Expense
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/120/20133?11228

     With the larger cable operators all rolling out VOIP to their
     markets, a new study predicts that North American MSOs will sign
     up nearly 28 million residential phone customers by the end of
     2009, increasingly at the expense of the telcos. In the study,
     Convergence Consulting Group predicts that U.S. cable operators
     will have 24.5 ...

User-Generated Web Content Will Grow Rapidly Through 2010
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20129?11228

     SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- User-Generated Content (UGC), such as that
     found on YouTube and MySpace, will continue to grow significantly
     in popularity and generate increasing revenue over the next
     several years, reports In-Stat. By 2010, the volume of
     downloads/views on these sites will surpass 65 billion, and
     revenues tied to UGC video ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:13:32 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com> said on
that big USENET thingie:

> * VoIP attracts small-business customers
> BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH

Has anyone else heard that some of the VOIP hardware is not fully POTS
compatible, in that it sometimes won't support a business phone
system?  I have heard that some of them are only designed to handle
one or two "phones".

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Any phone system which can 'grab' or
connect to a pair of wires connecting to a VOIP installation works
okay. For example, my puny little system: If I dial '9' from any 
phone, I connect to a landline outside. If I dial '8', I connect to
the VOIP adapter and whatever is connected to it. Granted, the VOIP
adapter (at least the one I have here) can only serve two lines at
one time, but, if it mattered that much to me, I could keep stacking
up the VOIP adapter boxes and continue the plug-ins.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: BrianEWilliams <sorry_no_email@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Headset Hack
Date: 27 Sep 2006 13:42:02 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


W Howard wrote:

> In article <telecom25.342.5@telecom-digest.org>,
> BrianEWilliams  <sorry_no_email@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> I am addicted to my telephone headset, and I like using a corded phone
>> for the sound quality and privacy.  Caller ID is a must, and phones
>> that have all these features (headsets, wired, and Caller ID) tend to
>> be more expensive business models.

>> This is the hack I thought of to let me use a cheap Wal*Mart wired
>> phone with a headset.  Simply wire a connection between the coiled
>> handset cord and my headset.  There are 4 connectors on the coiled
>> handset cord, one for talking, one for listening, and a ground each.

> That "ground" is a return current path, but may not be at ground
> potential.  There is a reason, at least sometimes, why the mike and
> speaker do not share their "ground" wire.

>> My headset has a 1/8" male stereo jack at the end.  The part
>> furthest from the tip would take both the ground wires, and then I
>> just have to find which is the mike, and which is the earpiece.

> Is there a reason why you don't want to remove the stereo jack and 
> replace it with a 4P4C modular plug like the telephone handset uses?

That seems like a good idea.  I'll try it when I have some time.

>> Then I have to find out what the 4 wires in the coiled handset cord
>> are and connect them correctly.  Is there any reason this won't work?

> The speaker part will probably work fine.  The microphone part may be
> more troublesome if the mike in the headset is a different type than
> the one in the original handset.  You could wind up losing all the
> voice quality that was one of your original objectives.

The speaker did work fine, but I wasn't able to get the mic to work.
Also, connecting it decreased the sound quality of the speaker,
possibly due to combining the "grounds".

Thanks for the reply.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #347
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Fri Sep 29 15:02:25 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 08D12224B; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #348
Message-Id: <20060929190224.08D12224B@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:05:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 348

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Verizon Wireless Lauches Broadband Network in Victoria, TX (Verizon News)
    Cingular Lauches 3G Network in Cleveland (PR News Wire)
    House May Vote on Phone Data Privacy Bill Soon (Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters)
    Windows Bugs Still Not Patched (Robert McMillan, IDG)
    Nortel Sees Higher Demand For Fiber Optic Gear (US Telecom DailyLead)
    Telecom Update #548 - Canada (John Riddel)
    Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers (support@sellcom.com)
    Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers (Carl Navarro)
    Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers (Steven J. Sobol)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:40:22 -0500
From: Verizon News Wire <verizon@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Verizon Wireless Lauches Broadband Network Services in Victoria, Texas


(STT Pressi.com 09/29/2006) Customers Can Now Get High-Speed Wireless 
Internet and E-mail Services, Download Video Clips and Songs to Handsets

Jimmy Duvall
Jimmy.Duvall@VerizonWireless.com
972-444-5515
Alison McMillon
Weber Shandwick for Verizon Wireless
amcmillon@webershandwick.com
972-830-2812
09/28/2006

DALLAS, TX -- Verizon Wireless announced today it has launched its 
wireless broadband network in Victoria, Texas, allowing local customers 
to utilize the latest high-speed business and entertainment services on 
their wireless phones, laptop computers and other wireless devices.

The expansion -- which entailed installing high-tech wireless hardware 
and software in wireless transmission sites throughout the region -- 
extends the Verizon Wireless BroadbandAccess network to Victoria. 
Hardware and software upgrades are complete, the system has been tested, 
and Victoria residents can now enjoy wireless broadband service on the 
state's most reliable network. The coverage area extends approximately 
from the junction of U.S. Highway 59 and U.S. Highway 77 in the west to 
the intersection of U.S. Highway 59 and Loop 115 in the east. From south 
to north, the coverage area reaches from the intersection of State 
Highway 185 and Bois d'Arc Road to the intersection of U.S. Highway 77 
and Tate Road.

"This expansion is part of our continuing focus on providing high-speed 
data services to our customers across the country and right here in 
Texas," said Luis M. Cruz, region president for Verizon Wireless. "This 
launch will offer access to the very latest wireless technology with 
services such as BroadbandAccess and V CAST Music and video."

BroadbandAccess allows customers to connect wirelessly to the
Internet, download e-mail and applications, and log into their
corporate servers via their laptop at broadband speeds. The technology
provides mobile workers full access, productivity and security, just
as if they were at their desks and attached via a high-speed wired
connection, but with the freedom of true mobility.

This wireless broadband experience is made possible by the Verizon 
Wireless EV-DO (evolution-data optimized) technology, with typical 
connection speeds of 400-700 kilobits per second (kbps).

The technology was first introduced in Texas in Austin, and now also
is available in the Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, Houston and
Beaumont metro areas.

The Verizon Wireless V CAST service gives customers access to short 
video content, downloadable music, and cutting-edge 3D games on their 
mobile phone. V CAST provides current news, weather, sports and 
entertainment programming on demand. And with access to more than 1.4 
million songs, music lovers with a V CAST Music-enabled phone can 
download and play their favorite songs -- all while on-the-go.

Verizon Wireless has invested $30 billion into its network in the last
six years -- $5 billion on average every year since 2000 when the
company was formed -- to ensure network reliability and increase
coverage and capacity.

About Verizon Wireless

Verizon Wireless owns and operates the nation's most reliable wireless 
network, serving 54.8 million voice and data customers. Headquartered in 
Basking Ridge, N.J., Verizon Wireless is a joint venture of Verizon 
Communications (NYSE: VZ) and Vodafone (NYSE and LSE: VOD). Find more 
information on the Web at www.verizonwireless.com. To preview and 
request broadcast-quality video footage and high-resolution stills of 
Verizon Wireless operations, log on to the Verizon Wireless Multimedia 
Library at http://www.verizonwireless.com/multimedia.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:50:32 -0500
From: PR NewsWire <prnewswire@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Cingular Lauches 3G Network in Cleveland


BroadbandConnect service offers ultra-fast connections

CLEVELAND, Sept. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Cleveland residents can now take
advantage of Cingular's super-charged wireless network which is
capable of providing customers with high-speed access to information
in a world that has gone mobile. Customers can use the
third-generation (3G) network to access Cingular BroadbandConnect,
which is available to nearly 35 million people in 52 communities
throughout the United States.

"Make no mistake about it: Wireless users want the speed and services
they've come to expect from their wired connections. And today
Cingular is delivering on its promises to provide both the speed and
reliability to our Ohio customers," says Dori Marks, Vice
President/General Manager for Ohio.

Cingular's 3G network is the first widely available service in the
world to use HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access)
technology. HSDPA is the high-speed evolution of GSM/EDGE (Global
System for Mobile Communication/Enhanced Data Rates for Global
Evolution), which shares a common core network. GSM is the world's
most popular wireless technology, which is used by more than one
billion people in 210 countries.

In addition to the BroadbandConnect service, 3G phones allow Cingular
to provide Cingular Video. Cingular Video(TM) on-demand streaming
video service offers a comprehensive library of mobile video content
with personalized access to razor-sharp clips on Cingular 3G phones
through Cingular's high- speed 3G wireless network. 3G phones like the
LG CU 500 are now available in Cleveland for $99.99 after a $50
mail-in rebate card and a two-year service agreement.

In 2005, Cingular initially launched the BroadbandConnect service in
Austin (TX.), Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas,
Phoenix, Portland (OR.), Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco, San
Jose (CA.), Seattle, Tacoma (Wash.) and Washington D.C.

"We're giving customers the ability to securely access information and
applications at broadband speeds in the office, on the road or at
home.  With our 3G service, almost any spot in a city is a hot spot,"
said Marks. "BroadbandConnect complements our national high-speed EDGE
data service, offering customers the flexibility and ubiquity required
to be more productive as the world continues to go wireless."

Cingular BroadbandConnect is a super-charged enhancement to the
company's nationwide EDGE network, the nation's largest wireless
high-speed data network. When coupled with a compatible device and
service plan, the service provides average mobile data connections
between 400-700Kbps (kilobits per second) on the downlink and bursts
to more than a megabit per second.

BroadbandConnect combines a laptop modem card, Cingular's
Communication Manager software and a Data Connect plan for use on
laptops. Customers can use their laptops to access the Internet or
e-mail, download large files and attachments, and run corporate
business applications at broadband speeds in areas covered by
BroadbandConnect. The service also offers additional security features
compared to alternative wireless technologies. Additional devices and
exclusive services that take advantage of the high-speed HSDPA
network, such as transmitting full motion video and providing
ultra-fast audio, are currently available.

Unlike services offered by some wireless companies, BroadbandConnect
stays connected when the user is outside the coverage area. The laptop
modem cards are dual-band HSDPA/UMTS (Universal Mobile Telephone
System) (850/1900Mhz) and backward compatible with EDGE (Enhanced Data
Rates for Global Evolution) and GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) in
four bands (850/900/1800/1900Mhz), so the session transfers to
Cingular's nationwide EDGE network or a data network of one of our
roaming partners.

The Cingular EDGE network is available in more than 13,000 cities and
towns and in areas along 40,000 miles of highways, providing average
data speeds between 70-135Kbps. Cingular customers can also access
data services in more than 90 countries.

Customers can purchase either a Sierra Wireless AC860 or Option GT Max
laptop modem card for $99.99, after rebate card, when they sign up for
a qualifying voice plan and introductory two-year $59.99/month
Unlimited Data Connect plan. A variety of monthly data plans are
available starting at $19.99 for 5 MB.

An updated version of Cingular Communication Manager is included with
the laptop modem cards. The software gives customers the flexibility
to connect to BroadbandConnect, EDGE, GPRS or public and private Wi-Fi
hotspots.

BroadbandConnect uses HSDPA/UMTS technology -- the global standard and
natural 3G evolutionary path for GSM providers. Wireless carriers
offering UMTS, EDGE or GPRS can upgrade their networks to HSDPA and be
assured there is a continued evolutionary path to faster speeds and
more advanced services.

About Cingular Wireless

Cingular Wireless is the largest wireless carrier in the United
States, serving 57.3 million customers. Cingular, a joint venture
between AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation , has the largest digital
voice and data network in the nation -- the ALLOVER(TM) network -- and
the largest mobile-to-mobile community of any national wireless
carrier. Cingular is a leader in third generation wireless
technology. Its 3G network is the first widely available service in
the world to use HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access)
technology. Cingular is the only U.S. wireless carrier to offer
Rollover(R), the wireless plan that lets customers keep their unused
monthly minutes. Details of the company are available at
http://www.cingular.com/. 

Cingular Wireless

Web site: http://www.cingular.com/
          http://cingular.mediaroom.com/
Copyright 2006, PRNewswire
Copyright 2006, InterestAlert

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more tech news each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/technews.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:30:12 -0500
From: Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: House May Vote on Phone Data Privacy Bill Soon


By Jeremy Pelofsky

Legislation that would make it illegal to obtain and sell consumers'
telephone records could come to a vote in the U.S. House of
Representatives on Friday, said Rep. Joe Barton, one of the measure's
authors.

Momentum to vote on the bill has been building since Hewlett-Packard
Co.  admitted that its investigators obtained telephone records of
board members, employees and journalists without their permission as
the company tried to find out who was leaking sensitive information.

"There's a good chance it might pop up today. We may actually get to
vote on it. It may be midnight tonight," Barton said at a hearing on
pretexting, the practice of someone impersonating an individual to get
the information without permission.

Barton, a Texas Republican and chairman of the House Energy and
Commerce Committee, said "the bill is alive and healthy."

The committee in March unanimously approved the measure, which also
mandates tougher Federal Communications Commission rules for phone
companies that maintain such records as well as higher fines for phone
companies that fail to adhere to the standards.

The bill would also require telephone carriers to get a customer's
permission before sharing some specific call information with others
for activities like marketing.

Democrats brought a "Gone with the Wind" movie poster to the hearing
and painted the bill number for the legislation, H.R. 4943, on the
poster because the measure had not been seen since May, when it was
pulled from the schedule for House floor votes, without explanation.

"We really do need to pass legislation, and in particular we need to
pass H.R. 4943," said Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat.

The full House has already passed a narrower bill to make pretexting
illegal and impose criminal penalties. The Senate is also considering
similar legislation, but it was unclear if the lawmakers there would
vote before leaving to campaign for the November elections.

"The committees are still working and finalizing language which might
not be finished this week," said Carolyn Weyforth, a spokeswoman for
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who controls the Senate schedule.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:33:17 -0500
From: Robert McMillan, IDG <idg@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Windows Bugs Still Not Patched


by Robert McMillan, IDG News Service

It has become a familiar pattern: A hacker posts exploit code to a
security Web site; Microsoft follows soon after with a warning to
customers.

The pattern was repeated again Thursday, only this time Microsoft's
warning that it is investigating "new public reports" of a critical
bug in Windows comes more than two months after sample code showing
how to take advantage of the flaw was posted to the Web. Microsoft's
advisory can be found here.

The flaw that Microsoft warned about is in an ActiveX control (called
WebViewFolderIcon) used by the Windows' graphical user interface
software. It was first disclosed on July 18 as part of a month-long
project by hacker HD Moore to expose problems in browser software.
Moore's blog post on the flaw can be found here.

Bugs Not Yet Investigated

Moore called his project the "Month of Browser Bugs" and ended up
disclosing a total of 22 Microsoft vulnerabilities during the period.

A few days ago, Moore quietly added exploit code for this latest flaw
to his Metasploit hacking tool. The exploit caught Microsoft's
attention after it was posted to the milw0rm.com Web site, Moore
said. But the security researcher believes that any competent hacker
could have developed an exploit based on his July blog posting.

So far, Microsoft has patched only two of Moore's flaws. In fact,
Microsoft engineers haven't even been able to investigate close to a
third of the vulnerabilities, Moore said.

Patches Coming Soon

Microsoft executives could not immediately be reached for comment, but
the company's security advisory said this latest WebViewFolderIcon bug
will be patched on Oct. 10.

"We have been in contact with HD Moore and at this time our
investigations have revealed that most issues relating to Internet
Explorer in particular will result in the browser closing
unexpectedly," Microsoft's public relations agency said Thursday in a
statement.  "Because of their nature, most of these issues will more
likely be resolved through a service pack release rather than a
security update."

Microsoft has been busy this month, rushing out an emergency,
"out-of-cycle" fix for a flaw in Internet Explorer's Vector Markup
Language rendering engine that was being widely exploited by
attackers.

Exploitable Bugs Unreported

Microsoft has even more work ahead of it, according to Moore. In early
August, he handed Microsoft another 70 bugs that he had not publicly
disclosed.

Still, he believes that more of his flaws should have been fixed by
now.

"I was kind of amused that they would do an out-of-cycle patch for the
VML bug, but would let all of these lapse," he said.

Microsoft has told him that at least four of his bugs are "exploitable
issues," meaning that an attacker could take advantage of them to run
unauthorized software on a victim's computer, Moore said.

Microsoft Response Slow

Earlier this week, Symantec said that Microsoft was the slowest of the
major browser-makers at patching its bugs during the first half of
this year.

But according to Symantec's numbers, Microsoft patched IE bugs, on
average, nine days after the public disclosure of a flaw. Most of the
22 Month of Browser Bugs flaws have been in public for two months now.

Copyright 2006 PC World Communications, Inc.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:54:09 CDT
From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com>
To: ptownson@telecom-digest.org
Subject: Nortel Sees Higher Demand For Fiber-Optic Gear


USTelecom dailyLead
September 29, 2006
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ezjIfDtusXdrqdgrzy

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Nortel sees higher demand for fiber-optic gear
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Analysts: Verizon's $22.9B FiOS project the right move
* Analysis: U.S. wireless carriers should embrace Wi-Fi
* RIM's Q2 profit up 27%
* Time Warner debuts Quick Clips
USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT
* CALEA Compliance: Obligations, Risks & Strategies
3, 1:00 p.m. ET
TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
* Study: 107 million users viewed online video in July
VOIP DOWNLOAD
* Call quality still a hang-up for VoIP
* Hotel chain to deploy VoIP
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Verizon Wireless sues pretexters in HP case
* Judge dismisses Texas cable group's lawsuit
DIVERSIONS
* Making Her Dream House Pay for Itself
* Some Phones Are Just, Well, Phones
* Honolulu
* Kazakhs Shrug at 'Borat' While the State Fumes
* The Ascent of Wind Power

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/ezjIfDtusXdrqdgrzy

------------------------------

Subject: Telecom Update #548, September 29, 2006
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:19:11 -0400
From: John Riddell <jriddell@angustel.ca>


************************************************************

TELECOM UPDATE

************************************************************

published weekly by Angus TeleManagement Group
http://www.angustel.ca

Number 548: September 29, 2006

Publication of Telecom Update is made possible by generous
financial support from:
** AVAYA: www.avaya.ca/
** BELL CANADA: www.bell.ca/home/Home_Business.page
** BIG PIPE: www.bigpipeinc.com
** CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA: www.cisco.com/ca/
** ERICSSON: www.ericsson.ca
** MICROSOFT CANADA: www.microsoft.ca/communications/
** NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS: www.necunifiedsolutions.com
** ROGERS TELECOM: www.rogers.com/solutions
** VONAGE CANADA: www.vonage.ca

IN THIS ISSUE:

** Number Shortages Loom in B.C., Alberta
** Court to Hear Challenges of Deferral Account Ruling
** RIM Reviewing Stock Options Practices
** Teleglobe Shifts Jobs to India
** City of Ottawa to Help Fund Broadband Access
** Fido Accepts Dialaround LD
** Peterson Steps Down as Avaya Chair
** "Dotmobi" Domain Names Go on Sale
** Primus Opens Vancouver Data Centre
** Mitel Provides Hospitals with Bedside Data Access
** Procedures Set for Price Cap Hearing
** Telus Managers Shift to Shift
** Couch Potato Report Updated
** 9-1-1 Experts Meet in Toronto
** Bell VoIP 9-1-1 Routing to Be Available to All Carriers
** CTCA Readies Western Conference
** Conference to Show Path Through Network Jungle

NUMBER SHORTAGES LOOM IN B.C., ALBERTA: The latest Numbering Resources
Utilization survey finds that Area Code 250 (southwestern B.C.) will run
out of phone number prefixes (CO Codes) in January 2008, and Area 403
(southern Alberta) will run out in October 2009, both much earlier than
previously forecast.

** The Canadian Numbering Administrator will hold industry
   meetings next week in Nanaimo and Edmonton to discuss
   plans for introducing new Area Codes. No relief plan is in
   place for either area.

** The sudden increased demand seems to reflect primarily the
   additional CO Codes needed to implement wireless number
   portability in March 2007, and to a lesser extent the
   cablecos' push into the local phone market.

COURT TO HEAR CHALLENGES OF DEFERRAL ACCOUNT RULING: The Federal Court
has agreed to hear two diametrically opposed appeals against the CRTC's
ruling on how funds in the telcos' deferral accounts should be spent. 
(See Telecom Update #517, 522)

   ** The Consumers Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty
   Organization argue that all of the money in the account should be
   returned to customers, not just the remainder after broadband
   spending.

   ** Bell Canada argues that none of the money should be returned to
   customers, because the CRTC has previously found the telco's rates
   to be "just and reasonable."
   
RIM REVIEWING STOCK OPTIONS PRACTICES: Research in Motion has opened a
investigation of stock option practices since 1997. RIM predicts that
past profits will be written down by up to US$45 million, but present
and future results will be unaffected.

** RIM's "preliminary results" showed a higher-than-expected
   quarterly profit of $141 million, which sparked a 20%
   increase in its stock price. Revenue of $658.5 million for
   the three months ended September 2 was up 7.4% on the
   quarter and 34% on the year.

** RIM has launched BlackBerry in Japan, with English-language input, 
   and plans to add a Japanese-language
   version next April.

TELEGLOBE SHIFTS JOBS TO INDIA: Teleglobe, once Canada's flagship
international carrier, is moving half of its 550 Montreal staff
positions to India. Teleglobe was bought by Indian carrier VSNL in
February and now uses the brand VSNL International. (See Telecom
Update #519)

CITY OF OTTAWA TO HELP FUND BROADBAND ACCESS: Ottawa City Council has
agreed to contribute $1-million to a private-public partnership that
will extend broadband access to all rural areas of the city by fall
2007. The project is expected to cost $3 million in total.

** About 60% of rural Ottawa has broadband access today, up from 2% in
   2003.

FIDO ACCEPTS DIALAROUND LD: Rogers' Fido cellular service now has its
first dialaround long distance provider. Montreal-based Buzz Telecom 
(10-11-555) offers Fido customers Canada-U.S. calls for 4.5
cents/minute.

PETERSON STEPS DOWN AS AVAYA CHAIR: Don Peterson, who resigned as
Avaya CEO in July, has now also relinquished the post of Chairman. He
is replaced by board member Philip Odeen.

"DOTMOBI" DOMAIN NAMES GO ON SALE: A new ICANN-approved top-level
Internet domain, .mobi, is now available for mobile devices and for
sites that serve them.

PRIMUS OPENS VANCOUVER DATA CENTRE: Primus Telecommunications Canada
has opened an Internet data centre in Vancouver, its third in
Canada. The centre supports hosted IT infrastructure and applications.

MITEL PROVIDES HOSPITALS WITH BEDSIDE DATA ACCESS: Mitel Networks'
Tele-Call system provides hospitals with bedside touch-screen terminals
through which staff can access patient information and patients can
order hospital services.

PROCEDURES SET FOR PRICE CAP HEARING: The CRTC has set the agenda and
procedures for the oral hearing on Price Caps, which will be held in 
Gatineau, Quebec, beginning October 10 and ending on or before October
20.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Letters/2006/lt060927.htm=20

TELUS MANAGERS SHIFT TO SHIFT: Three Telus managers have accepted
senior positions with Shift Networks, a Calgary-based provider of VoIP
services for small and medium businesses. Keith Bradley is now Shift's
VP sales; David Kozicz is VP client services; Wes Semeniuk is VP
network operations.

COUCH POTATO REPORT UPDATED: The latest edition of Convergence
Consulting's report on "The Battle for the North American Couch Potato,"
dealing with the market for bundled Internet, TV, and telephone
services, is now available. The Table of Contents and Introduction are
available online at http://www.convergenceonline.com

9-1-1 EXPERTS MEET IN TORONTO: The Association of Public-Safety
Communications Officials (APCO) Canada and the National Emergency
Number Association (NENA) Ontario are hosting a trade show and
conference on 9-1-1 services from September 30 to October 4 in
Toronto. Delegates are expected from across Canada, as well as the
U.S., India, Nepal, the UK, and Australia.

http://www.apco.ca/conference/

BELL VOIP 9-1-1 ROUTING TO BE AVAILABLE TO ALL CARRIERS: CRTC Telecom
Order 2006-254 orders Bell Canada to make its VoiP Call Routing Service
available to both VoIP and non-VoIP service providers in order to route
end-customer emergency calls to the correct PSAP.

** Bell charges more for VoIP CRS than for its alternative
   zero-dialed emergency routing service, but with VoIP CRS
   competitors don't need to maintain their own routing
   databases or train operators to route emergency calls.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Orders/2006/o2006-254.htm

CTCA READIES WESTERN CONFERENCE: The Canadian Telecommunications
Consultants Association will hold a one-day conference in Calgary
October 17 on "Avoding the Trips and Traps of IP Communications."
Telus CTO Ibrahim Gedeon will give the keynote.

http://www.ctca.ca

CONFERENCE TO SHOW PATH THROUGH NETWORK JUNGLE: The proliferation of
wireless networks, devices, and applications can create a management
headache and a planning nightmare. At Enterprise Networks 2006, John
Riddell will discuss management principles for navigating New Age
Wireless.

** Other top industry speakers will include: Gary Audin,
   Michael Dunn, Greg Macdonald, Deepak Chopra and Henry
   Dortmans.

** Enterprise Networks 2006 will be held at the Metro Toronto
   Convention Centre October 24-25. Register online at
   http://www.enterprisenetworks.ca 

HOW TO SUBMIT ITEMS FOR TELECOM UPDATE
E-mail ianangus@angustel.ca and jriddell@angustel.ca

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE (OR UNSUBSCRIBE)

TELECOM UPDATE is provided in electronic form only. There
are two formats available:

1. The fully-formatted edition is posted on the World Wide Web late
   Friday afternoon each week at http://www.angustel.ca

2. The e-mail edition is distributed free of charge.

   To subscribe, send an e-mail message to:
      join-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com=20
   To stop receiving the e-mail edition, send=20
   an e-mail message to:
      leave-telecom_update@nova.sparklist.com

   Sending e-mail to these addresses will automatically add
   or remove the sender's e-mail address from the list. Leave
   subject line and message area blank.

   We do not give Telecom Update subscribers' e-mail
   addresses to any third party. For more information,
   see www.angustel.ca/update/privacy.html.

COPYRIGHT AND CONDITIONS OF USE: All contents copyright 2006 Angus
TeleManagement Group Inc. All rights reserved. For further
information, including permission to reprint or reproduce, please
e-mail jriddell@angustel.ca.

The information and data included has been obtained from sources which
we believe to be reliable, but Angus TeleManagement makes no
warranties or representations whatsoever regarding accuracy,
completeness, or adequacy.  Opinions expressed are based on
interpretation of available information, and are subject to change. If
expert advice on the subject matter is required, the services of a
competent professional should be obtained.

------------------------------

From: support@sellcom.com
Subject: Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:59:28 -0400
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com


support@sellcom.com said on that big USENET thingie:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Any phone system which can 'grab' or
> connect to a pair of wires connecting to a VOIP installation works
> okay. For example, my puny little system: If I dial '9' from any 
> phone, I connect to a landline outside. If I dial '8', I connect to
> the VOIP adapter and whatever is connected to it. Granted, the VOIP
> a dapter (at least the one I have here) can only serve two lines at
> one time, but, if it mattered that much to me, I could keep stacking
> up the VOIP adapter boxes and continue the plug-ins.  PAT]

Yes, but what if you had 5 or 6 POTS phones plugged into the same
line, would it work, or 10 phones? I believe that is what is
separating the "men from the boys" in VOIP adapters.

Regards,

Steve

www.sellcom.com for firewood splitters, ergonomic chairs, 
office phone systems, "non-mov" surge protection, Exabyte, 
CA, Minuteman, Brave Products, Fisch, TMC, Panasonic and more
Check out http://www.guardian.name

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: That I do not know. I think the only
way to insure that it will work is by keeping the phone instruments
and the VOIP adapter separate from each other; have the phone system
do its own thing and the VOIP adapter do its own thing for one or
two phone linesm as per my earlier example, dial some code to have
the affected phone seize one of the VOIP circuits.

Anyway, more than one (or maybe, with luck) two VOIP connections at
the same time via the same broadband connection really slows things
down a lot on the  computer does it not?  PAT]

------------------------------

From: Carl Navarro <cnavarro@wcnet.org>
Subject: Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:18:58 -0400


On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:13:32 -0400, support@sellcom.com wrote:

> USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com> said on
> that big USENET thingie:

>> * VoIP attracts small-business customers
>> BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH

>> Has anyone else heard that some of the VOIP hardware is not fully POTS
>> compatible, in that it sometimes won't support a business phone
>> system?  I have heard that some of them are only designed to handle
>> one or two "phones".

Of the 4 VOIP ATA's I've used, they all support key system trunks with
a REN of 0.4B or whatever.  It seems that somewhere I read an ATA is
good for 2 REN's.  Even that would be 5 0.4 devices bridged on the
line, but the key would be that you don't even attempt to do that.

I guess that means it's fully POTS compatible, but not more than a
couple of POTS devices.  Just pretend you live in the sticks.

As far as number of lines, we stacked up 4 Vonage lines in a poor
man's hunt group using CF-Busy feature on lines AB and C.  The nicest
part of that is we could build it and tear it down via the web.
Eventually, we did a CF-Busy/No answer to the customer's main land
line since we didn't give those number out to the general public and
the outbound access was via a group CO key.


Carl Navarro

------------------------------

From: Steven J. Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Subject: Re: VoIP Attracts Small-Business Customers
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:47:46 UTC
Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com


In article <telecom25.347.8@telecom-digest.org>, support@sellcom.com
wrote:

> USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com> said on
> that big USENET thingie:

>> * VoIP attracts small-business customers
>> BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH

> Has anyone else heard that some of the VOIP hardware is not fully POTS
> compatible, in that it sometimes won't support a business phone
> system?  I have heard that some of them are only designed to handle
> one or two "phones".

Depends.

You'd really have to give an example of VOIP hardware that supposedly
will only support a couple lines.

**SJS, whose boss just purchased hardware for me to put in a 
shiny new Asterisk PBX! :)
 
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Apple Valley, California     PGP:0xE3AE35ED

It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #348
******************************
    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Sep 30 00:01:20 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id 2D9BB2248; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:01:20 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #349
Message-Id: <20060930040120.2D9BB2248@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:01:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:00:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 349

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Government Keeps Control of ICANN (Reuters News Wire)
    Internet Gambling Bill Gets Last Minute Push (Reuters News Wire)
    ICANN Agreement Paves Way For DNS Transition (Peter Godwin)
    TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 29, 2006 (telecomdirect_daily)
    Does Anyone Know of a Cheap VOIP 'Bridge'? (Jim Stewart)
    Re: Cingular Lauches 3G Network in Cleveland (Steven J. Sobol)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:26:56 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Government Keeps Control of ICANN 


The U.S. Commerce Department said on Friday it would retain oversight
for three more years of the company that manages Internet domain
names, renewing an agreement that was scheduled to expire this
weekend.

The government said it signed a new agreement with the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which controls
addresses such as ".com" and country domain names such as ".cn" for
China.

The U.S. government has previously said it plans to eventually turn
over complete control of ICANN, a nonprofit group, to the private
sector. The new agreement calls for a review in 2008 of ICANN's
progress toward becoming more accountable, the Commerce Department
said.

"We are committed to working with ICANN to ensure that they have the
established transparency and accountability mechanisms necessary to be
a stable, lasting and independent institution," said John Kneur,
acting assistant secretary for communications.

The current three-year agreement between the U.S. government and ICANN
was scheduled to expire on September 30.

ICANN officials said they were pleased with the plan.

"This is a major step forward for the Internet community," said Paul
Levins, an ICANN vice president. "This is about the U.S. government
saying that ICANN should be very clearly put on a path toward
autonomy."

For example, under the new agreement, ICANN will no longer have to
file reports with the Commerce Department every six months, Levins
said.

"We as an organization will no longer have our work prescribed by the
Department of Commerce," he said, adding it was a key step in weaning
ICANN from U.S. government oversight.

The Commerce Department said it consulted with more than 700
companies, trade groups, foreign governments and individuals before
deciding to renew the agreement.

Some critics say the U.S. government has too much control over ICANN,
which has evolved into a crucial engine for global commerce,
communications and culture.

The government posted its new three-year agreement on the Internet at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/newstoday.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:29:33 -0500
From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Internet Gambling Bill Gets Last Minute  Push


By Peter Kaplan

Most forms of Internet gambling would be banned under a tentative
agreement reached on Friday by U.S. congressional negotiators.

Pending a review by other lawmakers, the measure could be brought up
within hours for passage by the House of Representatives and Senate
and then forwarded to President George W. Bush to sign into law.

The measure would be attached to an unrelated measure to bolster port
security. Democrats had accused Republicans of pushing the bill to
placate its conservative base, particularly the religious right, in
advance of the November 7 elections.

"It's been over 10 years in the making. The enforcement provisions
provided by this bill will go a long way to stop these illegal online
operations," one of the bill's key backers, Sen. Jon Kyl (news, bio,
voting record), a Republican of Arizona, said in a statement.

The agreement, a blend of earlier measures passed by the House and
Senate, would make it illegal for banks and credit card companies to
make payments to online gambling sites.

Efforts to win support for the House version had been opposed by
lobbyists representing casino owners and other gambling interests.

The bill would leave out an additional provision of the House bill
that would have clarified that a 1961 federal law banning interstate
telephone betting also covers an array of online gambling.

Investors in British-based gaming companies such as BETonSPORTS Plc,
Partygaming Plc and 888 Holdings Plc are closely watching the U.S.
legislation.

Democrats have criticized the Republican-backed measure as an
election-year appeal to the party's conservative base, particularly
the religious right.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a potential 2008 presidential
candidate, recently appeared at a hearing in Iowa -- the state that
holds the first presidential nominating contest in 2008 -- to listen
to concerns about Internet gambling.

(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky)

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

------------------------------

From: Peter Godwin <godwin@isoc.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:03:32 +0200
Subject: ICANN Agreement Paves Way for DNS Transition


Reston, VA and Geneva, Switzerland - 29th September 2006 - ISOC
welcomes the agreement announced today between the United States
Department of Commerce (USDoC) and the Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).  The agreement ensures continued
stability of the Internet by setting the foundation for an orderly
transition of the Domain Name System (DNS) to the private sector. It
also demonstrates clear support for ICANN and the role it plays in
coordinating those activities related to the Internet's system of
unique identifiers.

The agreement moves beyond the milestone-driven "oversight" model to
one in which ICANN has greater flexibility and the United States
Government takes a more discrete role, echoing ISOC's recommendations
during the USDoC NTIA's recent public hearing on the transition of the
DNS.

"This is a constructive step in the direction of private sector
management of the DNS," said ISOC's President and CEO Lynn
St.Amour. "We believe this agreement contributes to the continued
stability of the Internet while allowing for additional operational
freedom for ICANN. The new agreement is also a positive indication
that the US Government is truly supportive of moving the management of
the DNS to a private sector model and we are very pleased to see
this. And of course, we believe ICANN is ready for this next step."

As its dramatic growth continues, the Internet will be faced by new
and more complex challenges. The Internet Society is working to ensure
that the Internet's successful and unique self-regulation models
continue to evolve in such a way that people everywhere can
participate in its development as well as continue to benefit from
open access to this "network of networks".  Today's announcement
supports this evolution by further legitimizing the processes that
determine how the Internet works.

ISOC's statement at the NTIA's public hearing on the transition of the DNS
is available here:
http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/ISOC_NTIA_statement_060726.pdf

ISOC's response to the NTIA's Notice of Inquiry is available here:
http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/ISOC_NTIA_response_060707.pdf

ABOUT ISOC

The Internet Society is a not-for-profit membership organization
founded in 1992 to provide leadership in Internet related standards,
education, and policy. With offices in Washington, DC, and Geneva,
Switzerland, it is dedicated to ensuring the open development,
evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit of people throughout
the world. ISOC is the organizational home of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF) and other Internet-related bodies who together play
a critical role in ensuring that the Internet develops in a stable and
open manner. For over 14 years ISOC has run international network
training programs for developing countries and these have played a
vital role in setting up the Internet connections and networks in
virtually every country connecting to the Internet during this time.

FOR FURTHER DETAILS

Peter Godwin
Communications Manager, Internet Society
E-mail: godwin@isoc.org
4, rue des Falaises
1205 Geneva
Switzerland

------------------------------

Subject: TelecomDirect News Daily Update - September 29, 2006
From: telecomdirect_daily <telecomdirect_daily-owner@www.telecomdirectnews.com>
Reply-To: telecomdirect_daily-owner@telecomdirectnews.com
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:06:49 EDT


********************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers Presents
The TelecomDirect News Daily Update
For September 29, 2006
********************************

French Fixed-Line Telecoms Market at a Crossroads
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20186?11228

     The intense competition in the French fixed-line telecoms market
     took a sharp turn earlier this week, as the key players announced
     optimistic but divergent views on the future of the market. The
     leading alternative residential broadband provider, Iliad, threw
     down the gauntlet earlier in the month-announcing plans to invest
     1 billion ...

Microsoft's Zune Player to Cost $249.99
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20176?11228

     SEATTLE -- Microsoft Corp.'s Zune music player looks a lot like
     an iPod, acts a lot like an iPod and will cost about the same as
     an iPod. The software giant said Thursday that it will charge
     $249.99 for the device, signaling that it isn't planning to
     spark a major price war to gain market share. It's not ...

ESPN Pulls Plug on Cell Phone Operation
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/140/20174?11228

     NEW YORK -- The planned shutdown of the Mobile ESPN cell phone
     service marks the first major bust in a rush of specialized wireless
     ventures targeting niche audiences they contend are underserved by
     the Cingulars and Verizons of the world. Mobile ESPN had made the
     same argument since its launch less than a year ago. But in ...

BenQ's German Mobile Unit Files for Insolvency
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20171?11228

     MUNICH, Germany -- BenQ Corp.'s German mobile phone unit
     filed for insolvency Friday, endangering 3,000 jobs and drawing a
     suggestion from former owner Siemens AG of legal action against the
     Taiwanese firm. An administrative court in Munich, where the BenQ
     unit is based, said it received the application for insolvency ...

Verizon Delivers Motorola KRZR
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20168?11228

     Hoping to build on the momentum of its popular RAZR handset,
     Motorola announced the commercial debut the phone's skinnier
     cousin, the KRZR. Verizon Wireless is the first wireless carrier
     to offer the ultra-thin device.  The MOTOKRZR K1m is17
     millimeters thin, 44 mm wide and sports a reflective, metallic
     gloss finish. The handset ...

New Coalition Pushes IP-Based Wireless Issues
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20165?11228

     A new wireless coalition has been formed to press for changes and
     for what it considers 'enhancements' in spectrum-management
     policies to help promote Internet Protocol-based technologies,
     services, applications and other advancements via RF use.  The
     Wireless Broadband Coalition (WBC) includes as its initial
     members ...

Alcatel/Lucent Wait on W OK
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/130/20162?11228

     Approval for the merger of Alcatel&nbsp;and Lucent Technologies
     Inc. looks set to be granted, or denied, by U.S. President George
     W. Bush. That's because the final regulatory clearance the two
     vendors need, from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the
     United States (CFIUS), is heading for the office of the
     President ...

BT & T-Mobile: No Convergence
http://www.telecomdirectnews.com/do.php/150/20159?11228

     T-Mobile USA has denied reports that it will enter into a partnership
     with BT Global Services to offer fixed/mobile services in the U.S.
     Reports out of the U.K. this week claimed BT and T-Mobile USA
     would partner to launch a converged service in the U.S. enterprise
     market. "Information about T-Mobile and BT has been ...

TelecomDirect Editor <telecom_direct_editor@us.pwc.com>
Copyright (C) 2006 PricewaterhouseCoopers.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:23:50 -0700
From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jkmicro.com>
Subject: Does Anyone Know of a Cheap VOIP 'Bridge'?


Does anyone know of a cheap VoIP "bridge"?

I'd like a pair of boxes that would serve as a bridge across TCP/IP
allowing me to connect a POTS phone at one end and a POTS line at the
other.  Ideally the phone would operate exactly as it would if it were
connected to the CO line with copper.

Anyone know of such a device?

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You might ask Mike Sandman about this
via his web site http://sandman.com or in email  mike@sandman.com  A
few months ago, Mike and I were experimenting with a device which
hooked a phone line (incoming) on one end to a VOIP line (outgoing) on
the other side.    PAT]

------------------------------

From: Steven J. Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Subject: Re: Cingular Lauches 3G Network in Cleveland
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:58 UTC
Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com


In article <telecom25.348.2@telecom-digest.org>, PR NewsWire wrote:

> BroadbandConnect service offers ultra-fast connections

>> CLEVELAND, Sept. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Cleveland residents can now take

Why is Cleveland significant?

San Diego and DC were significant for Verizon's launch of EV-DO. DC
is, obviously, our capital city. :) San Diego is home to the company
that owns CDMA and EV-DO technology.

Is Cleveland the first city in which Cingular is launching?

> advantage of Cingular's super-charged wireless network which is
> capable of providing customers with high-speed access to information
> in a world that has gone mobile. Customers can use the
> third-generation (3G) network to access Cingular BroadbandConnect,
> which is available to nearly 35 million people in 52 communities
> throughout the United States.

OK, it's not. :)

Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
Apple Valley, California     PGP:0xE3AE35ED

It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #349
******************************

    
    
From editor@telecom-digest.org  Sat Sep 30 17:48:26 2006
Return-Path: <editor@telecom-digest.org>
X-Original-To: ptownson
Delivered-To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Received: by massis.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11648)
	id EC1C221D0; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:48:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V25 #350
Message-Id: <20060930214825.EC1C221D0@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:48:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org (TELECOM Digest Editor)
Status: RO

TELECOM Digest     Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:50:00 EDT    Volume 25 : Issue 350

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Manhattan Telecom Company Pleads Guilty to Big-Rigging Charges (DOJ News)
    Catholic Bishops Concerned About no Safeguards on Web Access (M Pattison)
    Wireless Providers Ask For Anti-Pretexting Law (AP News Wire)
    When "Full Disclosure" Equals Collusion, Users Are in Danger (M Solomon)
    Re: Did The "System" Work Correctly, or Not? (David Wolff)

====== 25 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest, and why not
support Net Freedom Now http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom . 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:16:54 -0500
From: Department of Justice Press Release <doj@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Manhattan Telecom Company Pleads Guilty to Big-Rigging Charges


FORMER NEW YORK HOSPITAL EMPLOYEE AND A MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY PLEAD GUILTY TO BID RIGGING AND RELATED CHARGES

WASHINGTON -- A former New York hospital employee and a
telecommunications company pleaded guilty Friday to charges relating
to their roles in a conspiracy involving kickbacks, bid rigging,
bribery, contract allocation, and related charges for the supply of
telecommunications equipment and services to Mount Sinai School of
Medicine and the Mount Sinai Hospital (Mount Sinai), the Department of
Justice announced.

Anthony Spadola of Morganville, N.J., a former information technology
manager at Mount Sinai, pleaded guilty Friday in U.S. District Court in
Manhattan to a three-count information. Spadola pleaded guilty to one
count of conspiracy to rig bids and allocate contracts for the supply
of telecommunications equipment and services to Mount Sinai from
approximately January 2001 through October 2004. Spadola also pleaded
guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit commercial bribery, mail
fraud, and to making false and fraudulent statements on corporate U.S.
income tax returns from approximately January 2001 until September
2003.  Additionally, he pleaded guilty to one count of income tax
evasion for failing to report as income kickbacks that he received,
and for improperly claiming business deductions on his U.S. individual
income tax returns for the years 2001 through 2003.

Broadcom Voice & Data Inc. (Broadcom) of New York City, a
telecommunications installation company, also pleaded guilty today in
U.S. District Court in Manhattan. Broadcom pleaded guilty to one count
of conspiracy to rig bids and allocate contracts for the sale of
telecommunications equipment and services to Mount Sinai from
approximately January 2001 through October 2004.

"The Antitrust Division will hold accountable those who attempt to
undermine open and competitive bidding processes," said Thomas O.
Barnett, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department's
Antitrust Division. "Today's sentences demonstrate that commitment."

The Mount Sinai Hospital is a 1,171-bed tertiary care teaching
hospital that serves the New York metropolitan area with a medical
staff of nearly 1,800. In addition to its medical education efforts,
Mount Sinai's School of Medicine performs clinical and basic-science
research.  Both the hospital and the school jointly operate an
information technology department, located within the Mount Sinai
Medical Center in Manhattan, that assists various departments and
facilities in creating and maintaining their telecommunications
infrastructures. This assistance includes selecting and contracting
with third party telecommunications vendors in order to install
equipment such as voice and data cables in Mount Sinai facilities.

Spadola's co-conspirator, Stephen Cogliano, also a former Mount Sinai
employee, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to one count of conspiracy to rig
bids and allocate contracts for the supply of telecommunications
equipment and services to Mount Sinai from January 2001 through
October 2004.

Spadola and Cogliano were responsible for obtaining bids from vendors
of telecommunications equipment and services on behalf of Mount
Sinai. They were also responsible for supervising vendors and
reviewing and authorizing their invoices for payment. According to the
Department, Spadola and Cogliano received payments from individuals
associated with Broadcom and another telecommunications vendor in
exchange for steering contracts to those companies. Spadola and
Cogliano opened bank accounts under the name of consulting companies
in April 2001 and May 2003, respectively, that were primarily used to
conceal illegal payments received from Broadcom. Court papers also
state that Spadola failed to report his receipt of all of the
kickbacks and that he took illegitimate business deductions on his
income tax returns.

Between January 2001 and September 2003, Broadcom paid Spadola and
Cogliano a total of approximately $154,000 in kickbacks in order to
ensure that Broadcom would be allocated a portion of Mount Sinai's
total contracts for purchasing telecommunications equipment and
services and that no alternative vendors would be chosen for those
contracts. The kickback money was paid through checks issued by
Broadcom to the sham consulting companies created by Spadola and
Cogliano.

Spadola is scheduled to be sentenced before Judge McKenna on Jan. 8,
2007, and Cogliano is scheduled to be sentenced before Judge Rakoff on
Jan. 25, 2007. Broadcom is scheduled to be sentenced before Judge
Swain on Dec. 28, 2006.

The bid rigging charge, a violation of the Sherman Act, carries a
maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, three years of supervised
release, and a $1 million fine for an individual, and a maximum
penalty of a fine of $100 million and a term of probation of five
years for a corporation. The conspiracy charge carries a maximum
penalty of five years in prison, three years of supervised release,
and a $250,000 fine for an individual. The count of income tax evasion
carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison, three years of
supervised release, and a $100,000 fine, together with the costs of
prosecution. The maximum fine on each count may be increased to twice
the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the
victim of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the
statutory maximum fine. In addition, the defendants could be ordered
to pay restitution to the victim for the full amount of that victim's
loss.

These charges arose from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation of
bid rigging, bribery, fraud, and tax-related offenses in the
telecommunications equipment and services industry. The investigation
is being conducted by the Antitrust Division's New York Field Office,
with the assistance of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and
the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation.

Anyone with information concerning bid rigging, bribery, tax offenses, 
or fraud in the telecommunications equipment and services industry 
should contact the New York Field Office of the Antitrust Division at 
212-264-9308 or the New York Division of the FBI at 212-384-3252.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:20:19 -0500
From: Mark Pattison, Catholic News Service <pattison@telecom-digest.org> 
Subject: Catholic Bishops Concerned About no Safeguards on Web Access


Catholic bishops among concerned about no safeguards for equal Web
access in new telecom bills

By Mark Pattison
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) In the era of regulated utilities, residents and
businesses alike knew what the charges would be for electricity,
natural gas and telephone service.

With an unregulated Internet, though, individuals seeking Internet
content and businesses and organizations hoping that users will click
on their sites may wind up paying huge fees to Internet service
providers before much longer.

Current telecommunications bills working their way through Congress
have no safeguards for "net neutrality," which allows any user equal
access to any Web site.

Net neutrality short for 'network neutrality' is the policy of keeping 
the Internet open to all lawful traffic by requiring that cable and 
telephone companies operate their Internet networks in a 
nondiscriminatory manner. It bars those companies from prioritizing 
Internet traffic to benefit their own content.

With no safeguards for net neutrality, religious groups, including the
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, fear that Internet service
providers will discriminate against them and charge them if they want
to get the same level and speed of service they now receive for their
online sites when someone types in their Web address.

Since the Federal Communications Commission deregulated the broadcast
airwaves about 20 years ago, the amount of religious content on those
airwaves has shrunk dramatically as radio and television broadcasters
have used the time once set aside for "public service" programming --
including televised Masses -- for profit-making endeavors,
including infomercials.

The fear is that recent FCC actions allowing large phone companies to
offer Internet services in a deregulated environment will have the
same effect on religious content on the Web.

If the Internet evolves into a "pay-to-play" situation, religious and
other noncommercial Web sites would have to pay fees to have their Web
sites open to users as easily as those of large commercial entities
– if they could afford to pay such fees.

Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said he would try to get a
telecommunications bill passed when Congress reconvenes after the
November elections for a "lame duck" session. The Senate version of
the bill currently has no provision mandating net neutrality. He told
National Journal's Technology Daily that the net neutrality issue was
"destroying this bill."

He added, "No one can tell me what net neutrality is other than
something that a few big companies want," adding that if the bill
fails over this issue "the people who blocked it will pay a terrible
(political) price."

The man credited with being the inventor of the World Wide Web, Sir
Tim Berners-Lee, told The New York Times in a telephone interview that
net neutrality deserves to be protected.

"Net neutrality is one of those principles, social principles,
certainly now much more than a technical principle, which is very
fundamental," he said. "The neutrality of the Net is a medium
essential for democracy, yes if there is democracy and the way
people inform themselves is to go onto the Web."

A group called Save the Internet says on its Web site it has collected
the names of nearly 1.15 million people who want net neutrality
preserved. The organization also says its coalition has 783
organizations, including the Christian Coalition of America, the
Interfaith Center for Social Justice, the Office of Communication of
the United Church of Christ, and Spirit Restoration Ministries. Also
allied with the coalition are nonprofit organizations, small
businesses, Internet service providers and individual Web sites.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:24:40 -0500
From: Associated Press News Wire <ap@telecom-digest.org>  
Subject: Wireless Providers Ask For Anti-Pretexting Law


Plea comes in second day of testimony in Congressional HP spying hearings
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Executives from the nation's largest wireless telephone
companies told lawmakers Friday they should outlaw the practice of
lying to get access to someone else's phone records,  also known as
pretexting.

On the second day of testimony over the spying scandal that has
embroiled the Hewlett-Packard Co., a House Energy and Commerce
subcommittee asked the six executives to defend how they safeguard
their customers' private billing information.

The nearly three-hour hearing followed Thursday's session at which 
Hewlett-Packard's top executives were grilled about their roles in the 
scandal. Most invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self 
incrimination, time after time. 

At Friday's hearing only one witness, Doug Atkin, owner of
Anglo-American Investigations Inc., invoked his right to refuse to
testify.

The most impassioned testimony came from a reporter, Christopher
Byron, whose phone records were obtained by a company about which he
had written an unfavorable story.

Lawmakers asked what happened to a bill their panel had approved that 
would ban pretexting, underscoring the point by putting up a mock 
vintage movie poster in the hearing room that read, 'H.R. 4943, Gone 
with the Wind.'

All six of the telephone company executives said they would support a 
bill criminalizing the practice of pretexting.

Thomas Meiss, associate general counsel at Cingular Wireless, the
nation's largest cell phone provider, said his company can sue a firm
that obtains customer records from his company under false pretenses,
but that is not enough of a penalty.

"I don't trust these people at all," he said of data brokerage firms 
that sell private phone records. "They need to be in jail."

Last spring, the House passed a different bill by a vote of 409-0 that
would put pretexters in prison for as long as 10 years and provide for
stiff fines. A broader bill supported by the Energy and Commerce
Committee, which has not made it to the floor, provides for civil
fines against pretexters, enforced by the Federal Trade Commission.

Current law lets the FTC pursue those accused of obtaining financial
records through fraudulent means, but the agency is limited in what it
can do with pretexters.

Joel Winston, who heads the agency's privacy section, said under current 
law the agency can only issue an injunction to make the pretexter stop 
doing business, and sue for ill-gotten profits. Legislation that allowed 
for specific fines against pretexting would be helpful, he said.

Kris Anne Monteith, chief of the Federal Communications
Commission's Enforcement Bureau, said her agency has been trying to
deter pretexters, including enforcing a requirement on carriers to
certify that they have data protections in place. The FCC has issued
$650,000 in fines against carriers for failure to comply with existing
FCC rules on private customer information.

Monteith also acknowledged that the agency had issued 'letters of 
inquiry,' the first step in an FCC investigation, to a number of 
carriers asking whether customer information was disclosed 'without 
authorization in connection with Hewlett-Packard's activities.'

The Senate is working on a compromise bill on pretexting that has
become the victim of a turf war between two committees.

Congress is scheduled to adjourn this weekend, but will likely be back 
after the election for a 'lame duck' session.

Meanwhile, the states appear to be having more success getting
legislation passed. On Friday, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
signed an anti-pretexting bill into law.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. 

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html

For more news and headlines from the media each day,  please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:55:32 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: When "Full Disclosure" Equals Collusion, Users Are in Danger


By: Joe Barr

Gone are the days when "full disclosure" meant the immediate public
release of information about vulnerabilities or exploits uncovered by
security researchers. Whatever it means today is the result of a
collaboration -- some might call it collusion -- between the
researcher or firm finding the flaw and the vendor or project
responsible for the code. Recent patches from Apple illustrate the
dangers of this practice when proprietary software is involved.

Last week, Apple announced three security patches for its wireless
component across virtually its entire platform line.

The first patch (CVE-2006-3507) is for two stack overflow
vulnerabilities in Airport, Apple's wireless driver. The second patch
(CVE-2006-3508) fixes a heap buffer overflow in Airport. The third
patch (CVE-2006-3509) addresses an integer overflow in Airport code
which handles third-party wireless card connections. All are ranked as
"high" severity in the National Vulnerability Database.

According to Apple, there are no known exploits for any of these
vulnerabilities. Of course, this is the same firm that denied its
customers were at risk from wireless vulnerabilities last month.

One bad Apple spoils the barrel

The problem is that Apple's claims that there are no known exploits
are false. Not only have exploits been found, they've been
demonstrated, explained, and widely publicized.

http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/09/26/1828244

------------------------------

From: dwolffxx@panix.com (David Wolff)
Subject: Re: Did The "System" Work Correctly, or Not?
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks Corp.


In article <telecom25.345.3@telecom-digest.org>, Doug Simpson, AP
<ap@telecom-digeet.org> wrote:

> Ex-WorldCom CEO Ebbers reports to prison
> By DOUG SIMPSON Associated Press Writer
> Copyright 2006 The Associated Press

> OAKDALE, La. -- Former WorldCom Corp. chief Bernard Ebbers drove through 
> the gates of a federal prison Tuesday to begin a 25-year federal prison 
> sentence on Tuesday for his role in the $11 billion accounting fraud 
> that toppled a company he built from a tiny telecommunications firm to 
> an industry giant.

[big snip]

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well, did the justice system in America
> work the way it should in this case?  If you take his present age of
> 65, add a 25 year sentence to that, he will get out of prison at the
> age of 90, if he lives that long, which is quite doubtful. An almost
> 'untouchable' man five years ago, and quite powerful, Ebbers has now
> been brought down, although I am not sure it was entirely his fault.
> Given the dishonest sales tactics of so many people telemarketing MCI
> service over the years, I imagine a lot of them are today thanking
> and praising God that _they_ were not selected instead of or in 
> addition to Ebbers.  He said several times at his trial that he mostly
> was a 'rubber stamp' on actions taken by his employees.  PAT]

To me this sounds like a Kafka-esque reversal of "I was just following
orders".  This guy had the authority, the responsibility, and the
paycheck to be in charge.

At least we can now say that the Feds weren't just picking on Martha
Stewart.

Thanks --

David

(Remove "xx" to reply.)

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm-
unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as
Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums.  It is
also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2006 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V25 #350
******************************

