From editor@telecom-digest.org Fri Dec 31 01:22:10 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id iBV6M9F06920;
	Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:22:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:22:10 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200412310622.iBV6M9F06920@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #625

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:22:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 625

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Red Cross Tsunami Victims' Web Site Overwhelmed (Lisa Minter)
    Silly Cell Phone "Ring Amplifier" (Thomas A. Horsley)
    Re: Can Someone PINGing Really Screw Your Network (Ed Clarke)
    Re: Can Someone PINGing Really Screw Your Network (Gene Berkowitz)
    VOIP (Don Nelsch)
    Re: Consumer Reports Story on Cell Phone Providers  (Joseph)
    Re: Telecom Definitions: Meaning For 'Seizure'? (Allen McIntosh)
    Re: Such Carnage is Hard to Believe! (John Levine)
    Phone Magazine From 1926 (Digest Reprint from Jim Haynes)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Red Cross Tsunami Victims' Web Site Overwhelmed
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:46:06 EST


GENEVA (Reuters) - A Red Cross Web Site to aid anxious relatives
locate survivors of the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster partially
crashed on Thursday after being overwhelmed by some 650,000 hits in
its first 24 hours, a spokesman said.

The Swiss-based International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRCS) was
installing a bigger server and hoped to have the site, which had
become almost impossible to access, up and running again on Friday,
Florian Westphal told Reuters.

"We have had a tremendous response ... the system is partially down,"
he said.

As a result of the technical problems, it was not possible to tell
just how many people had been able to find their loved ones through
the site -- www.familylinks.icrc.org system.

But a few people had called to have names removed, he added.

The site has special sections for the four worst-affected countries --
Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand and India -- where the overwhelming
majority of the more than 125,000 deaths occurred.

Some 5,000 foreign tourists, mostly Europeans, are unaccounted for
after an earthquake off Indonesia sent a wall of water crashing into
coasts and devastated beach resorts around the Indian Ocean.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Reuters News Service.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

Subject: Silly Cell Phone "Ring Amplifier"
From: tom.horsley@att.net (Thomas A. Horsley)
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:37:43 GMT


No one had a pointer to any cell phone ring amplifiers when I was
looking for one a while back, so having time to kill over Christmas, I
made my own. Find the tale of the insanity at:

   http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/phonetale/phonetail.html

>>==>> The *Best* political site <URL:http://www.vote-smart.org/> >>==+
      email: Tom.Horsley@worldnet.att.net icbm: Delray Beach, FL      |
<URL:http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley> Free Software and Politics <<==+

------------------------------

From: Ed Clarke <clarke@cilia.org>
Subject: Re: Can Someone PINGing Really Screw Your Network
Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:15:50 GMT
Organization: Ciliophora Associates, Inc.
Reply-To: clarke@cilia.org


In article <telecom23.624.5@telecom-digest.org>, BertieBigBollox @
gmail.com wrote:

> Seems a bit hard to believe. Surely one computer pinging would make
> very little impact even on a DSL connection ... Would be a bit
> unfortunate if this were the case and someone got hold of your static
> IP :-)

Depends upon the relative speeds of the connections.  A fast ping from
an OC3 will hurt you a lot.

> Also, what about UDP floods? Are these different? Surely firewalls
> etc would stop this sort of thing from happening?

Not at all.  The traffic's on the line, whether or not it gets into a
computer is beside the point.  And in any case, you usually run into
DDOS (distributed denial of service) rather than DOS right now.

"De inimico non loquaris sed cogites." 

------------------------------

From: Gene S. Berkowitz <first.last@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Can someone PINGing Really Screw Your Network
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:31:31 -0500


In article <telecom23.624.5@telecom-digest.org>,
BertieBigBollox@gmail.com says:

> Read somewhere that if someone continually pings your network, the
> server will eventually fall over.

> Seems a bit hard to believe. Surely one computer pinging would make
> very little impact even on a DSL connection ... Would be a bit
> unfortunate if this were the case and someone got hold of your static
> IP :-)

> Also, what about UDP floods? Are these different? Surely firewalls etc
> would stop this sort of thing from happening?

Ping can be set to send up to 65,500 bytes per packet. Usually the
"ping of death" is sent from many sources at once.  Eventually the
server spends so much time replying to the pings, it can't get any
real work done.

A firewall will reject what it's told to reject.  That doesn't stop
the packets from arriving over your connection, consuming your
bandwidth.

--Gene

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:14:19 -0500
From: Don Nelsch <dnelsch@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Don Nelsch <dnelsch@gmail.com>
Subject: VOIP


Pat,

I have seen much discussion of Vonage and Skype, but very little of
Michael Robertson's (LINSPIRE) SiPphone.  Off hand, that looks to be a
decent service at very moderate cost.  What am I missing?

Don

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Off hand, I do not think anyone has 
ever written here or talked about the service. Maybe Mr. Robertson
does not have very good press for some reason. Can you tell us more
about the Linspire SiPphone service? If it is good, and inexpensive,
I might switch to it myself.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports Story on Cell Phone Providers 
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:44:03 -0800
Reply-To: JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com


On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:09:56 -0500, LB@notmine.com wrote:

> The new Consumer Reports magazine has a large story on cell phone
> providers and cell phones.  You can get better info in this group, but
> the mag has lots of info.  Will be very handy for those times when a
> "friend" is looking for info.  I think the mag should be on newsstands
> now.

Take what Consumer Reports magazine has to say about cell phones with
a grain of salt.  In past "cellular" issues they poo-pooh'd some
carriers basically T-Mobile (then VoiceStream) because they didn't
have fallback to older first generation analog technology.  Guess
what?!  Lots of phones now being offered by *all* the carriers and
don't have analog.  They out and out refused to even look at
VoiceStream/T-Mobile because they are luddites and couldn't see what
was coming down the pike.  If you want good recommendations or
information about cellular service look at what they have to say, but
take it with a grain of salt.  They do much better testing washing
machines, riding lawn mowers or crash worthiness of automobiles.

------------------------------

From: Allen McIntosh <nospam@mouse-potato.com>
Reply-To: nospam@mouse-potato.com
Subject: Re: Telecom Definitions: Meaning For 'Seizure/Seizure Signal'?
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:52:52 -0500
Organization: Optimum Online


Jack wrote:

> What does Seizure mean in telecom?  What is Seizure Signal?

You can find all this and more at a telecom glossary site.  Search for
"telecom glossary".  (You may have more luck with "seizing".)

He might also try searching the telecom glossaries we have on line
at our web site  http://telecom-digest.org .   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: 31 Dec 2004 01:59:38 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Such Carnage is Hard to Believe!
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA


> If such waves hit either the east or west coast of the U.S., how far
> inland would the destruction be?  One mile?  Ten miles?  How much
> shoreline (ie length) would be affected?

> For example, say the wave were to hit Coney Island in Brooklyn NY,
> how much of Brooklyn would've been destroyed?

Here on the east coast we have hurricanes and other storms, and a
storm surge is not altogether unlike a tsunami.  Most of the east
coast, from Cape Cod all the way to Miami, has barrier beaches in
front of shallow bays so a storm surge or tsunami would whack the
barrier beach pretty badly, but the energy would dissipate before
reaching the mainland.  Most of the construction close to the water is
now storm resistant, typically on pilings with breakaway construction
at ground level, and I'd think that design would resist a tsunami
pretty well.  Coney Island is unusual in that it's not a barrier beach
(that's why it is where it is) but I believe they do have seawalls
under the boardwalk, and it faces south while most waves arrive from
the east.

On the west coast, it depends on the topography which varies a lot.
In Santa Monica, for example, there is a high bluff which should limit
tsunami damage to the small amount of stuff below the bluff, while a
couple of miles south in Venice and Marina del Rey it's flat, and a
big wave would whack them.  Press reports remind us that tsunamis have
in living memory hit northern California and killed people, so they
should pay attention.

R's,

John

------------------------------

From: Telecom Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Phone Magazine From 1926
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST


Eleven years go in this Digest we were given a copy of an old 1926
internal telco magazine published by Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company. As we now approach a new year, I thought this reprint from
our archives might make very interesting reading. It was sent to us by
Jim Haynes.

PAT

   Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 14:19:29 -0500
   From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
   To: ptownson@gaak.LCS.MIT.EDU
   Subject: telephone.magazine.from.1926

   From: haynes@cats.ucsc.edu (Jim Haynes)
   Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
   Subject: Telephony in 1926, Part 1 of ???
   Date: 18 Aug 1993 06:19:46 GMT
   Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz
   Lines: 200

I was recently given a copy of the Southwestern Bell employee magazine
"Southwestern Telephone News", issue of October 1926, which was Volume
13, No. 10 and hence must have started publication about 1913.  This
article will be a summary of the contents; perhaps I'll type in or
review particular articles later.

The front cover shows a cable splicer hanging from a strand as he
splices an underground cable to an aerial cable in Dallas.

Repeated several times througout the issue is, "New Long Distance
rates and practices went into effect on October 1st.  Pamphlets giving
full information on these changes are available for all employees.
Study the rates carefully so that you can answer the questions of
subscribers."  I remember this attitude, that all employees should be
prepared to represent the company to the public, was later embodied in
a slogan, "To the public _you_ are the telephone company," that was
constantly presented to employees.

On page 2 is a photograph of sheep with their heads in the grass, and
an amusig caption: "Sheep (Eating) In July, our explanation that the
folks in the frontspiece were stacking wheat brought a protest from
Kansas that they were not stacking but were shocking wheat.  This time
we take no chances.  Grazing, as we remember, is the right term, but
we are not sheepherders. (Texas panhandle, please note.)"

The first article is a bio of Charles P. Cooper, former president of
Ohio Bell who was just elected vice-president of AT&T.

Next there are five pages with pictures reporting on a Telephone
Pioneers meeting in New York City.  Among other activities they
visited AT&T headquarters, Bell Labs, and New York Telephone
headquarters and were greeted by executives of those companies.  The
highlight was an address by Thomas A. Watson, who told of his
experiences as a colleague of Alexander Graham Bell.  This was
followed by a demonstration of talking movies, including one depicting
the invention of the telephone and narrated by Watson.

Then there is an article "Efficient and Courteous" by an anonymous
"counterman".  He tells of receiving a letter of commendation from a
customer.  Even though he had had to turn down the customer's request
for service he had fully explained why there was a shortage of
facilities in the customer's area, and the problems of the company in
extending its lines.

Then the medical director of AT&T writes to those who have just
returned from vacations, urging them to use their spare time during
the week as a "vacation all year."  He suggests they get out of doors,
do the essential chores, of course, but do something recreational.
"...forget as far as possible that you ever worked for the
Telephone Company."

The telephone exhibit at the Philadelphia Sesquicentennial Exposition
is described, with a reminder that the telephone was first exhibited
at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia 50 years earlier.
The 1926 exhibit includes a showing of motion pictures, two of which
are talking.  One of these features Thomas A. Watson [and is presumably
the same film that was shown to the Pioneers]; and the other "contrasts
the noisy operating room and crude apparatus of the eighties, when
boys were operators, with the central office of the present."

I guess in those days AT&T stock was marketed through telephone offices,
as there is an article about how an AT&T rights offering was handled.
There are accounts of company employees persuading the public to buy
stock, and also of people who threw away the rights documents, not
realizing they had monetary value.

There's a sort item about telephone operators assisting when there
was an explosion at a high school, and another showing the first
installation of a P.A. system in a school, with switching so that
music or voice can be had in any combination of rooms.

Then there is the second part of an article reprinted from _Telephony_
by an operator, Manta J. Elder, about her experiences.  There were
annual floods when the Marais-des-Cygnes overran its banks near
Ottawa, Kansas.  Many operators lived across the river from the
telephone office and had to cross the river in canoes and stay at the
office so they would be available.  Also severe winters when the
streets were impassable to vehicles and the company sent horses to the
residence of each operator to bring them to work.  Sleet storms in
February took lines down, so things were very quiet at the switchboard
until service was restored; and then everybody wanted to use the
telephone.  She tells of working the last day at an old switchboard
before cutover to a new one in a new office.  "The next day i went by
the old office, and my feet naturally led me up the old stairway.  If
I had known that I should see the salvaging force at their work, I
would never had have the courage to enter the old room.  The board was
already sadly wrecked.  It seemed to me that I was looking upon
something almost human, which was being made to suffer after years of
patient and loving service to a public which now gives it no thought.

     "As I walked on toward my home, I fell to thinking of the many
     and varied messages that had been carried through that old
     public servant.  The first news of special interest to all people
     handled through its channels was the news of Admiral Dewey's
     victory at Manila Bay, which occurred about three weeks after
     the installation of the board.

     "Service began on this old switchboard June 13, 1898, and
     except for one hour during President McKinley's funeral, until
     December, 1915, it was a living part of the community it so
     faithfully served."

She goes on to tell of the World War, and of the influenza epidemic.
Says that in earlier times the telephone operators often complained
that they were not appreciated by the public, but at the time of
writing most people are truly appreciative of their services.  A
little of the history of the company, which was originally the Kansas
City Telephone company, called the "Home" Company; at the time of
abandonment of the old switchboard the "Home" and "Bell" companies
were consolidated under the name of "The Kansas Telephone Company", in
the spring of 1915.  On January 1, 1926, the company was transferred
to Southwestern Bell.

Then there are three pages of managerial personnel changes, with some
portraits.  Then an article about formation of the Charles S.  Gleed
chapter of Telephone Pioneers in Kansas City, and an article about the
switchboard in St. Louis being extremely busy in the aftermath of the
St. Louis Cardinals winning the National League pennant.

A page of short items: Clemenceau quoted on the need for technical
experts to be aware of matters outside the scope of their expertise; a
comment on the article by "a counterman"; an article about the recent
AT&T stock issue; and a repeat of the item about new long distance
rates and practices.

Four pages with pictures about Bell Telephone Laboratores, and some
unrelated pictures of employees enjoying their summer vacations.

Two pages about Texas beginning a new billing method: instead of
billing all customers on the same day of the month they will spread
the billing dates throughout the month to smooth out the workload.

Two pages about handling mail in the headquarters mail room, the need
for good addresses, and the problem of customers sending cash in the
mail when paying their bills; an average of $15 a day is found in the
mail room when the supervisor has to open inadequately addressed mail.

Then a rather technical article, with schematic diagram, of a circuit
to simplify cutting phantom transpositions. (When a phantom circuit is
added to two existing circuits it is necessary to alter the way the
wires are transposed on the poles.  This must be done without
interrupting service on the exiting circuits any longer than
necessary.)

Two pages of service records, including portraits of seven men who
have worked a total of 185 years.

One page about the "first annual" Watermelon Festival in Hope, AR.

An article about keeping score on collection work; teams get points
for minimizing the need to communicate with subscribers to get them to
pay their bills.

Photographs of the new Norman, OK office, and an open house for
visitors.  Suggestions for Halloween costumes (illustrations) and two
pages of illustrations of ladies' fashion suggestions.  A page of
cartoons by "Stack", with a Halloween theme.

Three pages telling where every construction crew is working and what
jobs they are working on.  Some photos, including a cable splicer and
his helper with what appears to be a push cart containing their tools
and supplies.  A page with a map of the company's territory, showing
the locations of all lost-time accidents for the year.  Four pages of
social news: parties, retirements, contests won, other activities.
"Anyone at St.  Louis Toll who wants a thrill, should let Miss Hogan
take them riding in her Ford.  She misses other cars by a fender."

A page "What I Did Today" containing stories by operators of how they
assisted the public.  A page of poetry written by telephone people.

Inside back cover, a list of the principal management officers of the
company and their titles.  Back cover, an AT&T advertisement.  This
one shows operators being delivered to their office in a truck in a
howling blizzard; and the text tells how people take the telephone for
granted, how different life would be without it, and how 300,000
telephone people work to maintain dependable service.  


haynes@cats.ucsc.edu haynes@cats.bitnet

"Ya can talk all ya wanna, but it's dif'rent than it was!"
"No it aint!  But ya gotta know the territory!"
        Meredith Willson: "The Music Man"

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #625
******************************
