From editor@telecom-digest.org Tue Dec 28 22:11:14 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id iBT3BD810426;
	Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:11:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:11:14 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200412290311.iBT3BD810426@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #622

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:10:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 622

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Surfing in Secret (Lisa Minter)
    Tracking Techniques (Lisa Minter)
    Keeping E-Mail Private (Lisa Minter)
    What Will the PC of 2005 Look Like? (Lisa Minter)
    NASA Television Now on Our Web Site (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Such Carnage is Hard to Believe! (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Re: Speaking of VoIP (John Levine)
    www.area-code.us (Mike Schoenberger)
    1st 1-900 Number Question on Millionaire Show (carl@mail.centuria.com)
    Re: Drill Bit Size (Tony P.)
    Looking For Users Manual For Bellsouth 4300GR Phone (eljainc@ameritech)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Surfing in Secret
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:31:29 EST


by Michael Fitzgerald - ExtremeTech

A famous cartoon from the early days of the Internet featured a dog
surfing his computer with the caption, "On the Internet, no one knows
you're a dog."
 
That cartoon implied a level of anonymity that doesn't really exist
online. You might tell your online pals you aren't a dog, but it
doesn't take much work for someone to figure out you visit
puppylove.com, have "Cat Marauder" on your Amazon wish list and spend
a lot of time in the DogzChew chatroom.
 
Now, you might be thinking that in truth, no one cares if you're a
dog. In fact, at a holiday party, a friend of mine asked me why
GhostSurf, a software package that helps you shield your online
privacy, was a selling point for his new PC. He didn't think he was
doing anything interesting online. Except shopping, checking out
various types of news sites, sending e-mail to clients and letting his
kids check out their favorite sites. All of these things could prove
very interesting, if not to governments and marketers then to bored
geeks and more malicious types.

But don't get paranoid. It's unlikely that you're being a victim to
keystroke logging or some other form of cyber-wiretapping. And most,
if not all, e-commerce sites use encryption software to protect their
orders. So, chances are slim that someone will capture your credit
card data as you type it in online.
 
But the IP address your computer has is tantamount to your home
address. It goes with you to every site you visit and gets recorded
along with all of your actions there, every time you go there. It's a
simple fact of Internet life that "sites do log stuff," says Simple
Nomad (Mark Loveless), a well-known white-hat hacker who is a senior
security analyst at toolmaker Bindview Corp. You actually may want
them to log at least some things about you, in order to get quick
access to a site or to place an order.
 
But Simple Nomad warns that you aren't just flitting around the
Internet unwatched. He impresses his teenage son by sitting in coffee
shops with his laptop and telling his son which joke in a chat room
made someone laugh or what their credit card number is. He uses a tool
called a sniffer to do this, in unsecure wireless network
environments.
 
Sniffing You Out

Sniffers do make it easy for others to find out whether you're a dog,
but they aren't all that common. They're generally not a threat to
someone on a home network with a firewall and good common sense about
what files not to open. But malicious hackers can break into logs of
Web sites and Internet Service Providers, which might contain things
such as your mother's maiden name, your passwords, your date of birth,
your credit card numbers and other types of personal
information. These can be used to build profiles of you, either for
identity theft or for other purposes.

Spyware
 
Then there's the scourge of spyware. You can read John C. Dvorak's
take on spyware and its various guises in PC Mag's 'Panic Over
Spyware.'

Typically, spyware is some innocuous-looking toolbar that lets you,
say, change the background color of sites you visit and is in fact
tracking what you do and sending information back to another
site. Spyware can be distributed automatically and even downloaded to
your computer without your knowledge, says Chris Wysopal, director of
development at Symantec Corporation. He warns that spyware spreaders
actually "are just throwing out a wide net and going after thousands
and thousands of people. That's more the way it goes on the Internet."
 
Foiling Criminals

So, how to avoid having your IP address become some criminal's window
into your life?

There are a series of tools to consider, and some simple, common-sense
steps to take that can help immensely.

First, the tools. Surf anonymously, which protects your privacy and
may help you reduce your spam levels and limit the amount of junklike
cookies that get dumped on your system. There are a wide variety of
tools available. A good sample can be found at the Electronic Privacy
Information Center. It covers 16 categories, including ways to
e-mail anonymously, surf anonymously and instant message securely.

Surfing anonymously might sound geeky, but it's not all that hard. The
basic premise involves using software to have your server mask your IP
address. It does this by taking, say, the URL you've typed into your
browser and sending the request via a different computer, which acts
as a proxy for the request; a go-between that cloaks who you
are. Good anonymizer tools will also use encryption, so that online
snoops can't just grab whatever traffic is going back and forth
between you and a Web site.

The main drawback to anonymizers is loss of surfing speed. Masking
your IP address will slow down your Web surfing, although it's less
noticeable in broadband environments.
 
Tools of the Trade

Three tools we like are Anonymizer 2004, Bypass Proxy Client 0.78 and
GhostSurf 2005 Platinum. All have encrypted communications, and all
use their own, company-controlled servers to keep your Web surfing
secret. Each is featured in 'Surf in Secret'.

The most basic is Anonymizer 2004, which sends any Web request you
make; going to Google, say, or buying a book on Amazon.com; first to
its own servers and then out to the Web, with a proxy IP address that
isn't yours. The service works well, but you are dealing with a single
source of servers; all Anonymizers; and it doesn't give you much else
than anonymous surfing for its $29.99 a year. You can, however, get a
series of other kinds of privacy tools for $99.95 a year.

At $49.95 a year, GhostSurf 2005 Platinum costs more than Anonymizer
2004, but it gives you a lot more, too. It's our favorite tool for
anonymous surfing, because it offers other tools, such as protection
for your instant messaging, and also a way to let you mark sites that
you want to allow to see your identity, such as a paid news site you
subscribe to.

Bypass Proxy Client 0.78 is also an excellent tool, but it's more for
advanced users. It requires some skill with software to use, and is
best for people who are unable to use Anonymizer or GhostSurf, perhaps
because their company IT department decides to block those
programs. One nice, though complicated, Bypass feature allows you to
route your Web traffic to a proxy server of your choosing.

If you're concerned about having your site requests going through
servers belonging to just one company, you might try software that
uses public servers to route your Web requests.  Steganos Internet
Anonym Pro 7 is a good tool in this category.

This app does take more time to set up than an application like
GhostSurf, since Steganos has to go out and search for public servers
to use as proxies, but it accelerates with use. It costs $59.95 a
year, and that nets you a spyware blocker, an Internet trace eraser
and a "shredder" feature.

The downside to software such as Steganos is that since the servers
are public, pieces of your Web surfing could be tracked. You also
can't encrypt your communications, so you could be tracked. There are
also free anonymizer tools available, though it's worth checking out
the background of any such free service.

Now, the habits. Wysopal notes that there are several simple things
people can do to protect themselves online:

Avoid the cookie monster. You can use your browser to set up a list of
the sites that can give you cookies. Don't let any other sites have
them, and don't accept their cookies.

Don't talk to strangers. Use pseudonyms for your e-mail and chat
accounts. Don't give your real name or information about yourself to
people you don't know well. Same goes for sites you're unfamiliar
with.

Don't fill out Web forms. The fewer places that have your personal
information, the more protected you are.

Use encryption where you can, and finally, when in doubt, fax. Wysopal
notes that no one has yet developed spyware for fax machines.

And that's just dog-gone good sense.

Michael Fitzgerald is an award-winning technology writer and
editor. His writing on technology appears in The Economist, Inc., MIT
Technology Review and a number of other publications. He's spoken at
numerous industry events and frequently appeared on CNN and other
major television networks.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance ExtremeTouch and Michael Fitzgerald.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Tracking Techniques
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:34:21 EST


Michael Fitzgerald - ExtremeTech

The classic techniques include things such as sniffing, which captures
all of the data coming from a connection and then analyzes
it. Sniffers originally were used to diagnose network performance. But
since they capture all of the data coming through a network, these
tools can be useful for mischief.

Sniffers might be a concern if you spend a lot of time surfing the Web
at your office, where your company has a right to track what you do
online.
 
But from home, you probably have little to fear from it. It would
require either dropping software undetected into a home computer, or
breaking into an ISP and do the same.
  
And even then, with encryption and Secure Sockets Layer-type
protections built into most Web sites that handle transactions,
there's a good deal of data that sniffers can't see, says Chris
Wysopal, director of development at Symantec Corporation.
 
He warns that it's far simpler for malicious cyber-types to write and
distribute spyware, or phishing, which involves building sites that
mimic a bank or retail site and then sending out mass e-mails alerting
people to an "emergency" such as the closing of their account if they
don't go to the site and give their personal information. These are
his top two concerns for privacy violations online.
 
While there are tools for battling spyware, both schemes are best
fought through avoidance. Don't download toolbars for your Web site or
other such packages unless you know the vendor is a legitimate one
(not always clear in the case of spyware, since adware can look like
spyware to some, and legitimate business use to others). And don't
believe any company that claims it needs your credit card number or
other personal information in order to preserve your account. It isn't
true.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, ExtremeTech and Michael Fitzgerald.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Keeping E-Mail Private
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:36:27 EST


by Michael Fitzgerald - ExtremeTech

Surfing anonymously is one thing. But wouldn't sending e-mail
anonymously be an online version of mash notes?
 
The quick answer is no. There are plenty of ways to protect your
identity when sending e-mail while still making sure that the person
who gets your e-mail knows it's from you. And there's good reason to
figure out how to do so. Unless you do something to shield your
e-mail, "it's basically a postcard," says Chris Wysopal, director of
development at Symantec Corporation. In other words, anyone at any ISP
can see the headers to your e-mail, which says who you are and who
it's going to, and can read it if they so choose. So can a hacker who
has compromised the ISP.

Wysopal recommends using encryption software such as PGP, which
effectively seals the envelope, though the headers; the to and from
addresses are still readable. But encryption continues to be a
challenge for most of us. That isn't so much because it's complicated;
it's much simpler than it once was; but because you can exchange
encrypted e-mail only with someone who uses the same software.
 
A simpler method, and one that also will shield your address, is to
use a re-mailer service such as Hushmail. These services strip off the
original address and put on a new one. It's like a forwarding service
in the real world, and it makes sure that unwelcome eyes can't see
your e-mail, know you sent it or who's getting it. You can read of
free services in PC Mag's 'Hiding Your Identity'.

Re-mailers range from easy to use to very difficult, as noted on
privacy advocate and author Andre Bacard's site dedicated to the
topic. They also can vary the level of anonymity (so yes, you could
send e-mash notes).
 
While it might seem simpler still to just set up a Webmail account
with a fake name, that's not as anonymous as you might think. For one
thing, if you use it from your home computer, and you don't use proxy
switching software to hide your IP address, it won't be hard for
someone to connect the IP address with the Webmail system.

Naturally, you could go to the public library or another publicly
available Internet site and use machines there. That does eliminate
the IP address problem. But even there, you have to remember that
unless you clear the browser cache and take other steps to erase your
tracks, the next user can figure out a lot of things about you.
           
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Extreme Tech and Michael Fitzgerald.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: What Will the PC of 2005 Look Like?
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:39:38 EST


by Martyn Williams and Tom Krazit, IDG News Service

Consumers thinking about buying a new computer in 2005 might be better
off putting off their purchase until 2006. With few major changes in
PC hardware or software due over the next year, the PC of 2005 is
likely to look awfully similar to the PC of today.

Big changes aren't due until 2006, when the Longhorn operating system
from Microsoft, 64-bit applications, and optical drives based on the
Blu-ray Disc and HD-DVD formats will become available to the average
user.

Still, that doesn't mean there are no technologies worth looking out
for if you do plan to upgrade in 2005.

Chipping In:

Intel and Advanced Micro Devices are expected to unveil dual-core
chips -- which contain two processor cores on a single piece of
silicon -- by the end of 2005, although they probably won't appear in
mainstream PCs until well into 2006, says Stephen Baker, director of
industry analysis at NPD Techworld in Reston, Virginia.

Intel will likely boost the cache memory in its Pentium 4 processor
and AMD is expected to increase the clock speed of its Athlon 64, but
these changes will be incremental. A more substantial shift in
processor performance, the move to 64-bit computing, probably also
won't happen next year, even though Microsoft is expected to finally
release a 64-bit version of Windows XP in early 2005.

Bigger changes can be expected in chip sets, which handle the flow of
communication between the processor and the rest of a PC. A new series
of Intel chip sets supporting the PCI Express interface and DDR2
memory will trickle down to mainstream systems, or those priced at
about $800, in 2005, Baker says.

PCI Express will allow data to travel faster between the chip set and
peripheral hardware such as graphics cards and storage. Intel has
billed its introduction as one of its most important upgrades in a
decade. While that might be stretching it, mainstream users will begin
to see more and more products that take advantage of the increased
bandwidth in 2005, Baker says.

DDR2 will allow memory chips to move data at faster clock rates. The
older DDR standard is reaching the limit of its effectiveness as
memory clock rates exceed 400 MHz. Memory chip vendors are expected to
produce larger amounts of DDR2 in 2005, bringing costs down and
allowing vendors to put faster memory chips in cheaper PCs.

PCI Express and DDR Memory will also appear in notebooks from early
2005 with the introduction of Intela??s next-generation Alviso chip
set. Notebook sales have been growing faster than those of desktops
for several years, a trend that will continue into 2005, says Roger
Kay, vice president of client computing at IDC, in Framingham, Massa-
chusetts.

Technologies that make it easier to handle music, video, games, and
other multimedia are also on tap for 2005.

PC  vendors will  release more  PCs with  Microsoft's XP  Media Center
Edition 2005 operating  system, designed to make it  easy to burn DVDs
and  manage digital  media files,  as well  as pause  and  record live
television.

To help users handle their expanding collections of music and movie
files, PC vendors will also increase the storage capacity of hard
drives in mainstream PCs. Today they are typically between 80GB and
120GB. In 2005, expect to see $800 PCs with around 200GB of storage,
Baker says.

A disk technology called Serial ATA is also becoming established. It
includes a feature called Native Command Queuing (NCQ), which allows a
drive to manage multiple commands from the PC in whatever order it
deems most efficient, rather than the order in which they were
received. It can deliver a substantial performance boost to users, and
that's good news for data-heavy applications such as those involving
video.

In the optical disc space, users are likely to see incremental
increases in DVD read and write speeds. In the latter half of the year
the first PC drives supporting new, blue-laser based disc formats,
Blu-ray Disc and HD-DVD, are expected to make their way onto the
market. Both formats are aimed primarily at high-definition video and
can store several times more data than today's DVDs. Single-layer
Blu-ray Discs can store around 25GB, while HD-DVD isn't far
behind. Hewlett-Packard recently became the first to go on record with
its plans for shipping Blu-ray Disc PCs, saying it will offer them in
2005.

However, the move towards PCs with better multimedia features will
only work if they provide a simple, rewarding experience for users,
notes IDC's Kay.

PCs captured the hearts and wallets of buyers by making tasks such as
word processing much easier. Televisions and DVD players are also easy
to use. People won't want a PC in their living room if it doesn't
provide them with a good experience for their money, Kay says.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance IDG News Service.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:04:23 EST
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: NASA Television Now on Our Web Site


For persons who are interested, you can now watch and listen to NASA
(National Aurenotics and Space Administration) audio *and video* here
on the telecom web site.

Go to http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nasa.html to watch and
listen. In addition to news/documentaries programs, you will also be
able to hear radio transmissions between Houston, Canaveral and
whatver vessel is in orbit at the time.

I hope you will enjoy  this Telecom Digest Extra feature.

PAT

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:36:53 EST
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Such Carnage is Hard to Believe!


I realize what I say next is not a telecom topic; but ... I say it and
hope you will give it some thought as I have several times today.

That disturbance of the earth over around s.e. Asia on Sunday has 
certainly taken its toll. AP Network news (in our td-extra section
on the web site) said as of Tuesday afternoon, USA time, the body
count was now over *fifty thousand* men, women and children, in
Sri Lanka and surrounding areas. 

Government authorities are instructing the living people to 'carry the
bodies as you find them out to the curb and leave them; we will do
mass disposal of the remains.'  It sort of reminds me of Monday
morning here in Independence, as the sanitary disposal trucks move
through the alleys collecting the garbage. I mean, can you even begin
to grasp or understand the horror of the whole scene in Sri Lanka?
Stacking the dead bodies at the curb where workers will take them away
over the next few days ....  

Meanwhile, the United Nations called on Dubya to do more than the
stingy pittance he offered. He said he would 'think about it'. Trouble
is, Dubya has gotten so badly in debt on account of Iraq, he does not
have a lot of money left over for things like alleviating human misery.


Patrick Townson

------------------------------

Date: 28 Dec 2004 20:50:53 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Speaking of VoIP
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA


> But then I realized, Cox is an FCC regulated voice carrier so all the
> fees and crap will kick in and the price will be > $24.99 I pay now.

> The guy trying to sell me this service was explaining my VoIP line
> isn't secure.

That's a pretty lame sales tactic.  He should have pointed out that
Cox's service has real 911, real operators, real battery backup so it
works when the power fails, and includes a real phone book listing.

Poking at their web site, I'm surprised to see that they don't bundle
long distance so if you don't like their not particularly cheap LD
service, you can use someone else's.

------------------------------

Subject: www.area-code.us
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:00:11 -0500
From: Mike Schoenberger <MIKE@cemedia.com>


Mark, Linc or Patrick,

I was unable to find another contact email so I hope that you receive
this and can forward my email to someone who can fix a link on this
site.

If you go to Codes -> Services -> Rocky Mountain Telco it goes to
http://www.rockymnttel.com/.

This is now a porn site for whatever reason!

Michael Schoenberger
Quality Assurance
Cutting Edge Media, Inc
1.800.561.9297 Ext 1119 =20
Fax 717.361.0860
mike@cemedia.com
www.CuttingEdgeMedia.com


"Exceeding Your Expectations is Our #1 Priority"

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I know Linc Madison reads this Digest 
now and then but I do not know that he has any control over that
web site other than possibly dropping it off of any listing he
maintains on his own web site. But there are numerous webmasters of
telecom related sites who read this Digest, and after they ascertain 
that the 'change in policy' at that web site was not the work of a
hacker and is, in fact real, they may choose to (a) either remove
it from any links at their own site or (b) contact the webmaster
there if they know who it is and ask what is going on. 

My opinion is the webmaster may have failed to pay his 'dues' to the
registrar of .com so his site was put up for sale, just like our
Internet History Org site was, (which Mikka, writing from the
numann mail server in Canada) assured me was perfectly proper. Maybe
 -- if this latest instance was a grab by a cybersquatter as my
internet-history.org was, he can get a place somewhere in the '.tf'
or '.tc' domain, like I did for the internet history archives.  PAT] 

------------------------------

Subject: 1st 1-900 Number? Question on Millionaire Show
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:40:10 +0000
From: <carl@mail.centuria.com>


Because of Christmastime, I am away from my usual email.
I am Carl Moore (cmoore@arl.army.mil).

On ABC-TV "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" show which aired last Friday
(Dec. 24), there was a question about the 1st 1-900 number (in 1980?).
The answer given was that it was used for Reagan-Carter debate (in
U.S. presidential campaign that year).  What about the 1-900-242-1611
used for Carter's call-in in 1977?  Notice that BOTH of these involved
President Carter.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The correct answer **should have been**
the 1977 call-in program. Someone should notify the producer of the
show and challenge his 'correct answer'.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Drill Bit Size
Organization: ATCC
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:37:53 -0500


In article <telecom23.621.7@telecom-digest.org>, nospam@crashelex.com 
says:

> Fred Atkinson wrote:

>> Can anyone on here tell me what the standard bit size that is used by
>> telephone installers to drill the holes for running standard, four
>> pair telephone wire through (like drilling a hole through the
>> baseboard into the floor to pull the wire in to wire a jack mounted on
>> the baseboard)?

> I have a 5/8" spade bit, 6 feet long with a 6 foot extension.  Spade
> bits are easier to aim, IMO, than twist bits.  Standard caveats apply
> wrt knowing what's ahead of your bit :-)

> I also have a "shorty" that's only 18" long, for special occasions.

5/8" seems huge. You can get CAT-5 through a quarter inch hole so I'd
recommend a long quarter inch bit. The 5/8" would be good for dropping
cable from the pole into the house but that's about all.

------------------------------

From: eljainc@ameritech.net
Subject: Looking For User's Manual For Bellsouth 4300GR Telephone
Date: 28 Dec 2004 14:50:36 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hello,

I am looking for the users manual or any documentation on the
Bellsouth 4300GR 4-line telephone system. Does anybody have this in
PDF format?

Thanks in advance,

Mike McWhinney

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #622
******************************
