From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Dec 16 15:06:25 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id iBGK6Ou29350;
	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:25 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200412162006.iBGK6Ou29350@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #601

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 601

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Wrong 911 Address Delays Firemen (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Identify Theft Victim Falsely Charged (Lisa Hancock)
    News Services via Internet (Fred Atkinson)
    FCC Approves Wireless Internet Access on Airplanes (Marcus Didius Falco)
    Seniors Confront Foul Cellphone (Eric Friedebach)
    Some Down Time for Digest Over Weekend (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Re: Software Should Not Be Copyrighted -- Lawsuit (Mark Crispin)
    Re: Is 'Transitional Fair Use' The Wave Of The Future? (C.W.)
    Re: AT&T CallVantage Service -- Your Thoughts (LB@notmine.com)
    Re: AT&T CallVantage Service -- Your Thoughts (Rick Merrill)
    Re: Cross Battery and Verizon (LB@notmine.com)
    Re: Kevin Mitnick Recalled (Michael D. Sullivan)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:46:54 EST
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Wrong 911 Address Delays Firemen


NEW YORK - AP via Independence Reporter, Wednesday, December 15 - 

A fire in a six-story apartment building early Wednesday, killed one
person and injured 31 others, and Mayor Bloomberg said firefighters
were delayed because the caller reporting the fire gave the wrong
address.

Six civilians were in critical condition fllowing their rescue, three
of them children. In addition, six firefighers, and five police
officers were injured. A candle in a second floor apartment appeared
to be the cause of the fire, and the fire quickly spread through the
entire second and third floor of the building, in Jackson Heights,
Queens.

Mayor Bloomberg said someone called 911 and gave the wrong address of
building. Firefighters went to the wrong address, discovered the
error, then immediatly went to the correct address, causing in total
a two or three minute delay in reaching the place they should have
been. By then, the fire was spreading quickly, and police officers
were called to assist in evacuating the building. The temperature was
in the upper teens or low twenties.

         ===================================

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: As sad as this event is, *nothing*
was said about the call to 911 going over VOIP, rather than the
more usual transport for calls to 911, nor was it explained who the
'someone' was that gave an incorrect address to the dispatcher. Maybe
one of our NYC readers can provide more background on this.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Subject: Identify Theft Victim Falsely Charged
Date: 15 Dec 2004 14:08:32 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


There are more and more reports of devastating losses to identity
theft victims.

One troubling newspaper columnist report stated that authorities only
pursue criminals when the monetary loss is extremely large, otherwise
it's not worth their effort.  This was very frustrating to one victim.

Another report (referenced below) described how another victim was
falsely charged with a serious crime and suffered as a result.

Apparently the victim's credit card was stolen, and the thief used it
to set up an illegal porn site.  The victim was raided by the Feds and
his business computer (and livlihood) was confiscated.  He was
eventually cleared of any crime, but that took months.  He claims his
computers were seriously damaged in the process.

With today's heightened sensitivity toward illegal porn, one can't
help but worry about the risk of some sort of identity theft, either
to steal money or as a malicious way to attack someone.

See:

http://1010wins.com/topstories/local_story_349120748.html

If anyone knows additional details about this story, would you post
them?

[public comments only, please]


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: He should have gotten out of the matter
by *immediatly reporting* -- as soon as he knew of it -- of his loss
to his local police, *then* always referred to that report whenever
there were further consequences.  But I do hope he sued FBI and other
government officials for the hassles he suffered as a result. PAT]

------------------------------

From: Fred Atkinson <fatkinson@mishmash.com>
Subject: News Services via Internet
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:29:45 -0500


    Does anyone know of news services devices provided via Internet
connection?  To give an example of what I mean:

    A news scroller that runs ball scores over as they are updated by
the news service provider.  This could be mounted in a bar or
restaurant and connected to a high speed Internet connection.

    If you could reply via email about this, I'd like to know who
offers such services.

    Regards,

    Fred

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Search on the net for the phrase
'RSS' (Really Simple Syndication) for services like you want.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:10:23 -0500
From: Marcus Didius Falco <falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: USATODAY.com - FCC Approves Wireless Internet Access on Airplanes


Press reports say that the FAA is in no hurry to allow this, so it may
be=20 several years before it's implemented. This article says that
they won't complete their technical study for 2 years.

Another scenario, however, would be to nibble away at the rules: use
is now allowed at the ramp with the doors open. It might be allowed on
some airlines while taxiing based on this experience. Then later it
could be allowed at altitude based on that experience. But that would
take a couple of years anyhow.

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2004-12-15-wifi-in-flight_x.htm

http://usatoday.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=3Dcpt&title=USATODAY.com+-+FCC+approves+wireless+Internet+access+on+commercial+jets&expire=&urlID=3D12603942&fb=3DY&url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Ftravel%2Fnews%2F2004-12-15-wifi-in-flight_x.htm&partnerID=1664

FCC approves wireless Internet access on commercial jets
By Genaro C. Armas, Associated Press

WASHINGTON Airlines can provide their passengers access to high-speed
wireless Internet while they fly, under a vote by federal regulators
Wednesday.

"If there is a theme for this meeting, it is that we want (new
technologies) on the land, in the air, and on the sea" Federal
Communications Commission chairman Michael Powell said Wednesday as
the commission considered new rules for airlines.

"We are pushing the frontiers in order to bring the information age to
all corners of the world," he said.

The FCC also talked about whether to end the ban on using cell phones
on planes, but did not vote.

David Stempler, president of the Air Travelers Association, a
passenger group, said the changes under consideration would "make
business travelers more efficient and while away the time for a lot of
other passengers. This is all the wave of the future here."

Currently, the only way passengers on domestic flights can communicate
with the ground is through phones usually built into the seat
backs. That service isn't very popular: It costs far more than
conventional or cell phones about $3.99 a minute and the reception
often is poor.

Of the three companies that initially offered that service on commercial
jets, only Verizon Airfone remains. It has phones on about 1,500 jets.

The FCC approved a measure to restructure how frequencies for such
"air-to-ground" services are used and allow the airlines to offer
wireless high-speed Internet connections.

Left undecided was the issue of how many companies the FCC would
allow, through an auction, to offer such services. Verizon Airfone
maintains that letting one company handle the service would ensure the
best quality, and existing technology can't support two competitors.

Others, including Boeing and AirCell, argue for two competitors to
prevent one company from having a monopoly. FCC officials said the
auction would take place within a year.

Once plans are completed and planes outfitted with the equipment,
wireless high-speed Internet access might be found on commercial
domestic flights by 2006, said Jack Blumenstein, chairman and CEO of
Louisville, Colo.-based AirCell.

The timeline on when air travelers would be able to start using cell
phones in flight is murkier, in part because both the FCC and the
Federal Aviation Administration ban the practice.

The FCC took up the issue Wednesday in an effort to start public
discussion, and commissioners might eventually relax the rules or lift
the ban entirely. Of most concern to FCC officials is how using a cell
phone in an airplane would interfere with cell phone use on the
ground.

The FAA is worried mainly about how airborne cell phone use would
interfere with a plane's navigation and electrical systems, agency
spokeswoman Laura Brown said. The technology used on seat-back phones
and being considered for use for wireless Internet hookups causes no
interference.

The FAA has commissioned a private, independent firm to study the
issue, and results aren't due until 2006. The FAA will not make its
decision on cell phone use until after the study is completed, Brown
said.

Allowing high-speed Internet access and cell phone use on planes could
offer cash-strapped airline companies a new source for revenues, said
Doug Wills, spokesman for the Air Transport Association, the major
airlines' trade group.

Still, airlines must weigh the demand for such service against the
desire of other passengers for a quiet cabin, Wills said. "Some people
see a cell-free environment as a good thing," he said.

Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. 

Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2004-12-15-wifi-in-flight_x.htm

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . New articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance Associated Press and USA Today.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Eric Friedebach <friedebach@yahoo.com>
Subject: Seniors Confront Foul Cellphone
Date: 16 Dec 2004 00:46:13 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


[Note from Eric: The headline in my post is not the one from the AP
feed. I changed it to make some sense in the archive. The actual
headline is below.]

Senior citizen, sentenced to probation, gets a thumbs-up in court
Associated Press, 12-15-04

ST. PAUL - A retiree who tussled with a man half his age who was using
foul language in a restaurant was sentenced to probation, but he got a
thumbs-up from attorneys and others who sympathized with his motives.

Bill Stevenson, 79, of Lake Elmo, pleaded guilty to one count of
disorderly conduct Tuesday in Ramsey County District Court, and judge
Paulette Flynn placed him on three months of probation.

"I think I could've won my case by going to trial, with a sympathetic
jury," said Stevenson. "I've had over 30 calls and letters and e-mails,
and I've not had one negative call. They're all on my side."

Stevenson and another retired 3M engineer, Sten Gerfast, 74,
confronted the man July 15 at Bruegger's Bagels in the Sun Ray
Shopping Center.  The two retirees were going over a design Gerfast
had invented when Jesse Tabor, of Minneapolis, entered the bakery with
his 13-year-old daughter.

In an interview after the incident, Tabor, 40, said he was talking on
his cell phone with a man whose home he was remodeling and said he
didn't recall cursing. But Stevenson and Gerfast remember it
differently.

"He was using the F-word against this guy he was talking to,"
Stevenson said. "There was an argument on the phone. The third time he
walked by our booth where Mr. Gerfast and I were trying to design
something, Mr. Gerfast said to me, 'Should I do something about it?'
I thought a moment and thought, 'What can you do in a case like this?'
I didn't know what you could do."

So Gerfast, of Mendota Heights, decided to confront Tabor. He tapped
him on the shoulder and asked him to take his call outside, Stevenson
said, but Tabor said something like, "This is none of your business."

"It was only when he used the words, 'you f-ing bastard' -- it was
yelled across the bagel shop so everybody heard it -- that I started
walking up to him," Stevenson said. "Then he said 'you f-ing a-hole"
and that really bothered me. I've been in lots of different places,
but when I heard that kind of stuff coming in my hometown, I thought,
'Somebody's got to do something.' "

Stevenson grabbed the phone from Tabor and the two men played
tug-of-war for a few seconds. Stevenson realized it was a dumb thing
to do, let go of the phone and Tabor "went sailing across the floor,"
Stevenson said.

The three men with charged with disorderly conduct. Gerfast was
acquitted in a court trial last month. Tabor, who has previous
convictions for criminal sexual conduct and drug possession, failed to
appear at a September hearing and a bench warrant was issued for him.
Attempts to reach him Tuesday were unsuccessful.

http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/news/politics/10420049.htm

[Note from Eric: This item came up on a local (Minneapolis) talk radio
station today. The talk show host was able to get Sten Gerfast on the
phone. It turns out Gerfast was the mechanical engineer on 3M's tape
drive backup system some years back, among over two dozen other
patents to his name under 3M.]

Eric Friedebach

/KMPX Rocks!/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:03:12 EST
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Some Down Time for Digest Over Weekend


John Levine, who helps the Digest by providing the alias
'telecom-digest.org' address to me, via his computer in Trumansburg,
NY said to me that this weekend coming up, he will be doing some
maintainence on one of his computers (rearranging files, etc) and so
will be off line part of the time. In the event, when you ask for the
URL http://telecom-digest.org this weekend, the computer tells you the
page cannot be reached, then use one of the other addresses to reach
our site.  In addition to our direct address
http://massis.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives you can also use
http://telecom-digest.n3.net if you wish. The preferred URL is the
first one (with '.org') but massis and .n3.net also work fine and
bypass John Levine's computer to get here.

Patrick Townson

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Subject: Re: Software Should Not Be Copyrighted -- Lawsuit
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:40:37 -0800
Organization: University of Washington


On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Steve Sobol wrote:

>> Intellectual-property consultant Greg Aharonian hopes to convince the
>> court that software makers can protect their products adequately
>> through patents

> No. Patents are absolutely NOT the proper way to go. Copyrights are.

I agree.  This is one issue that the Gnu radicals got right.

Now, we may all feel that copyright should not last as long as it
does, especially in the field of software where the value of
intellectual property becomes moot long before its creator dies.  All
too often, the preservation of antique software has been hampered by
the difficulty in identifying who owns the IP and securing permission.

Even worse, once the owner is identified, it turns out to be an
extraordinarily complex and expensive process to get the permission
executed even when the owner is otherwise pleased to grant it.  What's
needed is an inexpensive process by which an owner can abandon IP
without undesirable side-effects.

But that's something that should be fixed in copyright law.

Patents, on the other hand, lock up techniques; and the history of
software patents is a sad litany of numerous obvious and commonly-used
techniques being claimed under patent.  The necessary litigation to
overturn such patents is ridiculously expensive.

Something tells me that Aharonian is a lawyer who's looking to drum up
even more business.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:17:32 CST
Subject: Re: Is 'Transitional Fair Use' The Wave Of The Future?
From: C.W. <temp18@thewolfden.org>


John Bartley <johnbartley@email.com> wrote on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 
12:25:44 -0500 about Re: Is 'Transitional Fair Use' The Wave Of The Future?

> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Clark W. Griswold, Jr. <spamtrap100@comcast.net>
wrote:
 ...
> Topic drift alert.

Not that that ever happens here in the -> TELECOM <- digest.

Or is it now the
Telecom-Computer-Hacker-Legal-WiFi-Television-Automobile-Etc News Feed
Digest?

------------------------------

From: LB@notmine.com
Subject: Re: AT&T CallVantage Service -- Your Thoughts
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:10:07 -0500
Organization: Optimum Online


Lanceman wrote:

> Hi -

> I am considering switching my local landline to the AT&T CallVantage
> service.  I have also looked at Vonage, but am unable to move my local
> number with them.  Anyone out there have good or bad experiences with
> the CallVantage service?

> Thanks in advance for your replies.

> Lance

I believe Consumer Reports thought poorly of ATT stuff.

LB

------------------------------

From: Rick Merrill <RickMerrill@comTHROWcast.net>
Subject: Re: AT&T CallVantage Service -- Your Thoughts
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:53:54 GMT


Lanceman wrote:

> Hi -

> I am considering switching my local landline to the AT&T CallVantage
> service.  I have also looked at Vonage, but am unable to move my local
> number with them.  Anyone out there have good or bad experiences with
> the CallVantage service?

Excellent experiences. When the previous company continued to bill me,
a rep. from CallVantage stayed with me on the phone until the other
company agreed to give me full credit from the date that CallVantage
switched on.

It was a snap to disconnect the house phones from the old system and
connect the Telephone Adapter (TA) to my house phone. One caution: it
may not power more than three REN (Ringer Equivalency Number) worth of
phones. Their official policy is to support a wireless phone with
multiple handsets.

One feature I use a lot is the phone messages my callers leave are
sent to me as attachments to email!

Another feature I like is the on-line list of callers: one click and the 
call is returned!

Rick Merrill

------------------------------

From: LB@notmine.com
Subject: Re: Cross Battery and Verizon
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:13:45 -0500
Organization: Optimum Online


Joe Perkowski wrote:

> Hey ppl,

> Does anyone know what is "cross battery"?  We put in a NBX 2 months
> ago running fine.  Now, we are getting static and crosstalk on some of
> our incoming lines.

> We have had a great deal of rain these past 2 weeks, and have had
> previously problems with Verizon due to old copper in our area.

> The Verizon guy is telling us "cross battery" is causing this?

> What is "cross battery" if anyone knows...?

> Thanks.

> Joe

He may be blowing smoke.  The rain points to your problem -- poor
cable.  The wires in the cable actually are rotated over distance.  As
you can see all cable have a sag.  If a poorly insulated wire inside
the cable is at the bottom of the bunch where the sag is low then
water can get in there.  Unfortunately the fix is new cable or new way
of routing.

LB

------------------------------

From: Michael D. Sullivan <nospam@camsul.com>
Subject: Re: Kevin Mitnick Recalled
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:29:45 GMT


In article <telecom23.593.6@telecom-digest.org>, lisa_minter2001
@yahoo.com says:

> Rummaging around through the Telecom Archives, I found two interesting
> items on Kevin Mitnick. I wonder if anyone knows what he has been
> doing since 1997 or whenever he got out of prison.

He's become a computer security consultant, appearing on 60 Minutes, 
writing in Newsweek, running his consulting website 
<http://www.defensivethinking.com/main/index.php>, writing books, etc.  
The usual stuff for a convicted notorious hacker. 


Michael D. Sullivan
Bethesda, MD, USA
Delete nospam from my address and it won't work.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #601
******************************


