From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Feb  5 14:06:11 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) id i15J6Bp13412;
	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:06:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:06:11 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200402051906.i15J6Bp13412@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #58

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:06:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 58

Inside This Issue:                           Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    "My Advice to Social Networking Services" (Monty Solomon)
    AT&T Wireless & T-Mobile USA Sign Airport Wi-Fi Roaming (Monty Solomon)
    Three Blind Phreaks (Monty Solomon)
    Connecting 4-Wire (Line-in and Line-out) to a Headset Jack (Newsgroups)
    The NUG-IT Magazine for Telecom Professionals (Pokey)
    Unused 800 Number - Ending in 1000 - Can I Rent it Out? (Chris Barr)
    You Switched -TO- Cavalier? (Carl Moore)
    Re: Switch Verizon to Cavalier, Can't Get Through Some Places (John)
    Re: Jackson, Timberlake Apologize for Flash (Clark W. Griswold, Jr.)
    Re: MTV Blames Janet Jackson for Super Bowl Incident (Laurie Laws)
    Re: What If ...? Was Re: Verizon Violates DNC List (jbl)
    Re: Faked CallerID Info? (Herb Stein)
    Re: Faked CallerID Info? (Ken Alper)
    Re: Plain Old Cell Phones Fading Away in U.S. (email@crazyhat.net)
    Call for Papers: ICWIN 2004 (Wireless Networks) (Mishra, Aishvarya)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk is definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:17 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: "My Advice to Social Networking Services"


Christopher Allen

I have now had CEOs of three different social networks send me emails
asking me to compare Orkut to their service. I've not had a chance to
dig deeply into good answers for each specific one, but I did have
some general advice that I wanted to offer given my recent experiences
with Orkut.com, and my evaluation and followup on various social
networking services in December.


http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/02/my_advice_to_so.html


Confirmed Email Privacy Hole at Orkut

Christopher Allen

Another Orkut user and I have confirmed a privacy hole in Orkut
whenever you send a message to someone via Orkut.

http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/02/confirmed_email.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:20 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: AT&T Wireless and T-Mobile USA Sign Airport Wi-Fi Roaming


Agreement Covers Wi-Fi at Denver International, Philadelphia
   International and San Francisco International Airports

BELLEVUE, Wash. and REDMOND, Wash., Feb. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --
Driving expanded Wi-Fi (802.11b) service coverage at the nation's
airports, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and AT&T Wireless (NYSE:AWE) today
announced a reciprocal Wi-Fi roaming agreement for Denver
International (DIA), Philadelphia International (PHL) and San
Francisco International (SFO) airports.  Today's announcement marks
the first roaming agreement between AT&T Wireless and T-Mobile for
Wi-Fi service.

As a result of this roaming agreement, T-Mobile HotSpot subscribers
can soon add DIA and PHL to the list of hotspot locations available to
them to stay connected to the Internet, access their corporate
networks, or check e-mail via a Wi-Fi enabled laptop or PDA.  For AT&T
Wireless Wi-Fi customers, the roaming agreement means they will be
able to use their Wi-Fi device throughout the public areas of SFO.
The companies' respective customers will be able to roam using their
existing user ID and password.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=40441795

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:33:27 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Three Blind Phreaks


Issue 12.02 - February 2004

Three Blind Phreaks

How the phone-phreaking Badir brothers ran rings around Israel's 
telcos for six scam-filled years.

By Michael Kaplan

Inside the chintz-filled living room of the Badir family's neat and
modest home, a feast of freshly roasted chicken, saffron rice, and
seasoned vegetable stew perfumes the air. Friends and relatives pour
through the front door to congratulate 27-year-old Munther "Ramy"
Badir. He's just been released from prison after serving 47 months for
computer-related crimes. Outside, Islamic prayers resonate from
speakers on a truck moving slowly down the dusty streets of Kafr
Kassem. Everyone in this Israeli village -- populated mostly by Arabs
-- appears ecstatic to have Ramy back.

But he does not see their smiles. Ramy, along with two of his three
brothers, has been blind since birth due to a genetic defect. He and
his sightless brothers have devoted their lives to proving they can
out-think, out-program, and out-hack anyone with vision. (Their
sighted brother, Ashraf, is a baker with no tech leanings.) They've
been remarkably successful. Ramy says dryly, "A computer that is safe
and protected is a computer stacked in a warehouse and unplugged."

Israeli authorities agree. The 44 charges leveled against Ramy,
Muzher, and Shadde Badir in 1999 included telecommunications fraud,
theft of computer data, and impersonation of a police officer. The
brothers' six-year spree of hacking into phone systems and hijacking
telephone time ended when they were convicted of stealing credit card
numbers and breaking into the Israeli army radio station's telephone
system to set up an illicit phone company. Unwitting customers -
mostly Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza Strip - paid the fake
telco for long distance calls that were billed to the radio station.
A lawyer close to the case said that the Badirs' scams pulled in more
than $2 million.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.02/phreaks.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 01:11:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: Newsgroups <lonergan@hotmail.com>
Subject: Connecting 4-Wire (Line-in and Line-out) to a headset jack
Organization: Optimum Online


I bought a USRobotics ConferenceLink Speakerphone from Heartland
America for 30 bucks.  Originally 400 or so.  That's the good news.
What they didn't tell me was that it is designed to work with PBX's
(obsolete ones at that) and it _won't_ work with analog POTS lines.
I'm a techie, so rather than send it back like any rational person, I
am determined to make it work.

It comes with the connector for the PBX (worthless), but because it's
USRobotics, it also comes with a connector to two mini-jacks that are
line-in and line-out to a computer sound card.  I tried it with my
speakerphone-enabled modem card and it works.  The qualilty is not
good, however, because of interference inside my home-made computer
box (my guess).

Then I got this bright idea.  I have a great Sony handset that has a
headset jack.  In the end what I want is the speakerphone to connect
into the headset jack of the Sony handset. To make that work, I need
to bridge between the 4 wire (line-in and line-out) jacks to a headset
jack.  RadioSnack doesn't have anything built for it (I've tried).
I'm willing to cut wires and have the appropriate jacks to do it, but
I'm confused about what to attach to what.  There are two wires each
going to the line-in and line-out jacks from the USRobotics
ConferenceLink.  It looks like there are two (maybe three?) going to
the headset.  Can someone tell me how to connect this up?

Thanks in advance for your help!

------------------------------

From: Pokey <no_spam@no_spam_no_way.com>
Subject: The NUG-IT Magazine for Telecom Professionals
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:00:25 -0500


The latest copy of The NUG-IT Magazine is available on-line.

If you are involved in, or wish to be involved in, IT, Telecom, or
Call Center operations then 'The NUG-IT Magazine' is for you.

It contains 'Golden NUG-ITs of Information - from Traditional to IP
Telephony'.

To download current and past issues, or to subscribe:
http://magazine.TelecomCafe.org

Subscription automatically enrolls you in our Reader Rewards Program,
and you will be notified by email of new issues.  www.nug-it.org

We do not sell or rent our list.

If you are interested in advertising or writing for The NUG-IT Magazine,
please contact us: http://www.nug-it.org/contact

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:13:25 -0500
From: Chris Barr <c-barr@comcast.net>
Reply-To: c-barr@comcast.net
Subject: Unused 800 Number - Ending in 1000 - Can I Rent it Out?


We currently have an 800 number that won't be in active use for
probably 2 years.  It's an attractive number, ending in 1000.

Can this be leased or rented out to another company?

In advance, thanks for any feedback.

Chris Barr

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:19:29 EST
From: Carl Moore <cmoore@ARL.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: You Switched -TO- Cavalier?


Some time ago (starting in July 2002 or so) I told the story of having
to have my lines taken back by Verizon after Cavalier withdrew from
the part of Maryland where I live (I am in the North East exchange in
Cecil County, and had subscribed to Conectiv local calling, later
taken over by Cavalier, because it offered local service to northern
Delaware, where some of my phone traffic goes).  But in going from
Verizon to Conectiv/Cavalier and back to Verizon, my phone numbers did
not change.

Where in Maryland is your Cavalier service?

------------------------------

From: jvj1@yahoo.com (John)
Subject: Re: Switch Verizon to Cavalier, Can't Get Through From Some Places
Date: 4 Feb 2004 22:17:08 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Just called from school to my home.  Now the calls are getting
through ... Voice mail is also working.  I'm sure the school and home
is same exchange, it is only few blocks away.

Thanks for replying.

-John

Ken Abrams <k_abrams@[REMOVETHIS]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.56.9@telecom-digest.org>:

> TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to John <jvj1@yahoo.com>:

>> Or maybe the school is on Verizon.  You said 'I have many people
>> call me and there is no problem with Cavalier.'  No, there probably
>> isn't any problem with Cavalier. I would suggest the problem is with
>> Verizon.

> My bet is:

> The school's phone works out of the same switch as John's home phone.
> Calls placed from that switch are the only ones that fail.

> Because:

> Calls from any other switch are routed based upon a query to a common
> data base.  They seem to work.

> Calls from within the home switch will NOT query the common database
> unless the number record in that switch says to make that query.  It
> appears that the number record in his home Verizon switch was not
> updated properly.

------------------------------

From: Clark W. Griswold, Jr. <73115.1041@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: Jackson, Timberlake Apologize for Flash
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 19:16:41 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


J Kelly <jkelly@newsguy-nospam-.com> wrote:

> Does anyone else wonder why they keep mentioning that affiliates may
> be fined?  How in the hell did some little CBS affiliate in West
> Undershirt, Iowa have anything to do with it?  They just pass through
> what the CBS network feeds them, they had *NO IDEA* they should be
> watching this in case they needed to censor it.  As far as they knew
> it was simply a football game.  

Because the affiliate is the one who holds the license for use of the
public airways and agrees to abide by the rules for that particular
chuck of public spectrum. Most of the FCC authority over the network
relates to Owned and Operated stations -- that is, stations the
network runs directly.

>The affiliates do not normally censor what the network is sending
>them unless they have reason to believe ahead of time that something
>offensive to their local audience is about to be broadcast.

Isn't that interesting ... You've just summed up the problem that most
people have with J&J's little stunt.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:51:55 -0500
From: Laurie Laws <laurie.laws@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: MTV Blames Janet Jackson for Super Bowl Incident


roger wrote:

> Janet shouldn't even be at the stupid bowl.

> And, stupid bowl sucked this year. Two teams no one cares about ...

Try again.  The Nielsen numbers were 44.2/Rating 63/Share.  It was one
of the best games ever for the Super Bowl, suspenseful right up to the
last few seconds.   Hardly something 'no one cares about'.  In New
England, the share was even higher.

------------------------------

From: jbl <jbl@spamblocked.com>
Subject: Re: What If ...? was Re: Verizon Violates DNC List
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 20:19:39 -0700
Organization: On the desert
Reply-To: jbl@spamblocked.com


In <telecom23.57.12@telecom-digest.org>,
noname <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net> wrote:

> New England Telephone and New York Telephone were the first to group
> together as Nynex. 

That's not quite how it worked.  After the reorg in 1984, the 22 (or so)
Bell Operating Companies were grouped under the seven regional holding
companies.  Nynex was the regional company for New York Tel and New
England Tel; Bell Atlantic had the various C&Ps, NJ Bell, etc.; Pacific
Telesis had Pac Bell and some others; Ameritech had Illinois Bell,
Michigan Bell and a few others, and so on.

It was later that Nynex decided to absorb NYT and NET into a single
operating company, and similar things went on elsewhere.  Then some of
the big mergers started (e.g. SBC borging PacTel and Ameritech, for
instance; Qwest buying USWest, etc.)

/JBL

------------------------------

From: Herb Stein <herb@herbstein.com>
Subject: Re: Faked CallerID Info?
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:36:24 -0600


Daniel W. Johnson <panoptes@iquest.net> wrote in message
news:telecom23.57.8@telecom-digest.org:

> TELECOM Digest Editor added in message
> news:<telecom23.56.5@telecom-digest.org>:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I guess so, if you feel that exposing
>> yourself on national TV is 'normal' behavior. Although I personally
>> feel Michael is innocent in this latest affair, victimized by a very
>> noisy mother, I also think he is just as goofy as she is. I do not
>> watch much television, and certainly not the Super Bowl. Thanks for
>> reminding me why not. I did not see either the horse incident or the
>> instance of LaToya Jackson's indecent exposure, but I certainly am
>> reading a lot about it.  PAT]

> I haven't read anything about indecent exposure on the part of LaToya,
> just the incident with her younger sister Janet on the Super Bowl
> halftime show.

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: My bad ... I should have said 'Janet'
> instead of 'LaToya'.  PAT]

LaToya was in Playboy/Penthouse/Hustler/ or one of them a few years
ago. Of course, the reader of the magazine found the spread anything
but indecent.  :-)


Herb Stein
herb@herbstein.com

------------------------------

From: ken@nac.net (Ken Alper)
Subject: Re: Faked CallerID Info?
Date: 5 Feb 2004 10:31:29 -0800


dold@FakedXCall.usenet.us.com wrote in message
news:<telecom23.53.3@telecom-digest.org>:

> I noticed that I have received some telemarketer calls that show an
> 800 number on caller ID, with the name of the survey or marketing
> firm.

I am VERY interested in any data like this. My firm has been trying to
do exactly this -- send an 800 number along with our name -- and we've
had absolutely no success doing so. If you can send along to me any of
the number/name combinations, I might be able to get in touch with
their telecom people and figure out how they're doing it.

--Ken

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Plain Old Cell Phones Fading Away in U.S.
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 00:55:14 -0700
From: email@crazyhat.net


In message <<telecom23.54.5@telecom-digest.org>> Joseph
<JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NOcom> did ramble:

> Believe it or not some people want a mobile phone that they can
> actually make and receive calls on.... easily.  It's going to be many
> years if never that cell phones supplant personal computers as a way
> to communicate data.

Here here.  Personally, all I really want out of a cellphone is to
make calls, receive calls, possibly a phonebook (names, numbers, and
nothing else), call timers, and a bluetooth interface.

Everything else should be handled on one of the several other
electronic devices I carry around with me, including the full
phonebook, web browsing, email, text messaging, photos, and whatever
other fetish is popular this week.

------------------------------

From: amishra@ilstu.edu (Mishra, Aishvarya)
Subject: Call for Papers: ICWIN 2004 (Wireless Networks)
Date: 4 Feb 2004 15:57:45 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com



                    CALL  FOR  PAPERS

	The 2004 International Multiconference in
	Computer Science and Computer Engineering

		(18 Joint Int'l Conferences)

	Monte Carlo Resort, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
		    June 21-24, 2004


Dear Colleagues:

You are invited to submit a draft paper (see instructions below). All
accepted papers will be published in the respective conference
proceedings.

The International Multiconference in Computer Science and Computer
Engineering is a major annual research event. It assembles a spectrum
of affiliated research conferences into a coordinated research meeting
held in a common place at a common time.  This model facilitates
communication among researchers in different fields of computer
science and computer engineering.  The last Multiconference attracted
over 1,650 computer science and engineering researchers from 78
countries. We expect to have over 2,000 attendees for this set of
conference.

One of the events of the 2004 conference (18 conferences) is:

2004 International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN'04)

All areas of wireless are welcomed. In particular, we are looking for
papers in the areas of security and routing of AD-HOC networks.

(a link to other conference's URL can be found at
http://www.world-academy-of-science.org)

Please regard this announcement as General Guidelines.  You are
requested to send your submission to session chair at the contact
address which appears below.

CONFERENCES CONTACT:

Mishra, Aishvary
Illinois State University
Tel (O): +1 309 438 8338
Fax (O): +1 309 438 5113
Tel (R): +1 309 862 3768
Mail: amishra@ilstu.edu
E-mail for paper submissions: ICWIN@lnotes.acs.ilstu.edu

SUBMISSION OF PAPERS:

Prospective authors are invited to submit three copies of their draft
paper (about 5 pages - single space, font size of 10 to 12) to
Aishvary, Mishra by the due date (who will be forwarding the papers to
respective conference chairs/committees).  E-mail submissions in MS
document or PDF formats are preferable (Fax submissions are also
acceptable.)

The length of the Camera-Ready papers (if accepted) will be limited to
7 (IEEE style) pages. Papers must not have been previously published
or currently submitted for publication elsewhere. The first page of
the draft paper should include: title of the paper, name, affiliation,
postal address, E-mail address, telephone number,& fax number for each
author.  The first page should also include the name of the author who
will be presenting the paper (if accepted) and a maximum of 5 keywords.

IMPORTANT DATES:

Feb. 21, 2004: Draft papers (about 5 pages) due
Mar. 22, 2004: Notification of acceptance
Apr. 21, 2004: Camera-ready papers & Pre-registration due.
Jun. 21-24, 2004: 2004 Int'l Multiconference in CS & CE

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-330-6774
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the second oldest e-zine/
mailing list on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2003 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #58
*****************************
