From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Nov 18 21:16:43 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id iAJ2Ghj14391;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:16:43 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200411190216.iAJ2Ghj14391@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #554

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:16:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 554

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    SBC To File Tariff With FCC For New VoIP Service (Jack Decker)
    Anyone Having any Luck With Google Ads? (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Telcordia to Announce Sale (Telecom dailyLead from USTA)
    Re: Wired News: American Passports to Get Chipped (David Clayton)
    Re: EFF: Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech (Ed Clarke)
    Re: EFF: Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: TV Movie: Category 6 - Day of Destruction (Raymond C Martin Jr)
    Re: TV Movie: Category 6 - Day of Destruction (Jim Haynes)
    Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits (Gene S. Berkowitz)
    Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits (J Kelly)
    Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Email Read in Automated Phone Call? (Thomas A. Horsley)
    Employment Opportunity: Do you know Telco Maintenance Expert? (HotJobs)
    Re: Somewhat Off Topic But a Must Read (Lisa Hancock)
    Looking For VOIP Provider to do Business With Government (T.Sean Weintz)
    Re: Vonage Tech Support Dead? (DevilsPGD)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:07:46 -0500
Subject: SBC To File Tariff With FCC For New VoIP Service


Jack Decker notes: I have to admit, I don't really understand this at
all, but it looks like it might be significant?

http://informationweek.networkingpipeline.com/news/53700323

Courtesy of Advanced IP Pipeline

SBC Communications Inc. is planning to introduce True IP to PSTN
(TIPToP) service in the coming week by filing a tariff with the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

TIPToP service is a time division multiplexed (TDM) telecommunications
service featuring switched circuit interfaces specifically designed
for use by a VoIP provider to connect traffic from its IP end users to
end users of the circuit-switched network.

According to SBC officials, TIPToP service is not a mandatory offering
but voluntary. VoIP providers who choose not to purchase TIPToP
service may use other services, "to the extent permitted by existing
tariffs and prevailing law, to connect traffic from their customers to
the circuit-switched network," according to SBC.

According to reports in the Wall Street Journal, SBC's plan will
involve an increase in fees normally paid for interconnection services
 -- a rate increase that has reportedly drawn immediate scrutiny from
the FCC.

Full story at:
http://informationweek.networkingpipeline.com/news/53700323

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:29:43 EST
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Anyone Having any Luck With Google Ads?


I just want to make a general inquiry of those of you who may be using
Google Adsense on your own web sites. I have not had very good luck
with it thus far. Although I have three blocks, or clusters of ads on
the 'latest-issue.html' page (which is the web version of whatever the
latest issue happens to be of this Digest) often times Google sends
one cluster of ads for teh horizonal block or cluster on the top, but
then sends nothign at all for the vertical 'towers' on the left side
of the page, just leaving green colored blocks there instead. I have
complained to them twice before about it, then it gets corrected for a
day ro two and goes back to being green blocks. My technical advisor,
Mr. Mattox, rebuilt that page totally to accomodate the (frequently
non-existent) ads. Needless to say, people do not click on the green
boxes, so it is wasted space and sort of leaves the page looking
lopsided.

My other comment is they apparently do not pay off until you get at
least a hundred dollars in combination of clicks on ads and use of
search box (and clicks on those ads), **then** they say they deduct
their cost of running the search engine from that. I would think
running the search engine should be their expense, not mine.  I am
sort of inclined to just get rid of all those ads and go back to the
old way of doing this Digest. Any thoughts from anyone on this?  Plus
I do not think they are very accurate in the way the go about counting
the number of impressions or 'hits' on each page. What are your
experiences?

PAT

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:06:41 EST
From: Telecom dailyLead From USTA <usta@dailylead.com>
Subject: Telcordia to Announce Sale


Telecom dailyLead from USTA
November 18, 2004
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=17597&l=2017006

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* Telcordia to announce sale
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* SBC, Yahoo! expand partnership
* Ofcom puts heat on BT
* Europe's telecoms on the rise once again
USTA SPOTLIGHT 
* Order PBX Systems for IP Telephony Today!
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
* AOL unveils new security software
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Congress nears reinstating ban on Internet access tax
* Qwest may settle shareholder lawsuits
* Former Nortel employee knew of revenue problems

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=17597&l=2017006

Legal and Privacy information at
http://www.dailylead.com/about/privacy_legal.jsp

SmartBrief, Inc.
1100 H ST NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20005

------------------------------

From: David Clayton <dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com>
Subject: Re: Wired News: American Passports to Get Chipped
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:23:36 +1100


kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) contributed the following:

> Marcus Didius Falco  <falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>> New U.S. passports will soon be read remotely at borders around the
>> world, thanks to embedded chips that will broadcast on command an
>> individual's name, address and digital photo to a computerized reader.

>> The State Department hopes the addition of the chips, which employ
>> radio frequency identification, or RFID, technology, will make
>> passports more secure and harder to forge, according to spokeswoman
>> Kelly Shannon.

> Great idea!  Now the bad guys can build bombs that explode when they
> detect nearby American passports!  It's just the thing to ensure
> Americans' safety abroad.

How many seconds until someone invents a RF-shielded passport cover?

Regards,

David Clayton, e-mail: dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(Remove the "XYZ." to reply)

Dilbert's words of wisdom #18: Never argue with an idiot. They drag
you down to their level then beat you with experience.

------------------------------

From: Ed Clarke <clarke@cilia.org>
Subject: Re: EFF: Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech
Date: 18 Nov 2004 02:21:50 GMT
Organization: Ciliophora Associates, Inc.
Reply-To: clarke@cilia.org


In article <telecom23.552.5@telecom-digest.org>, Monty Solomon wrote:

> EFF White Paper Reports on Collateral Damage to Free Expression in
> the Fight Against Spam

> San Francisco - Today the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
> released a white paper (HTML - PDF) describing the effects of
> anti-spam technologies on free speech. "Noncommercial Email Lists:
> Collateral Damage in the Fight Against Spam" focuses on how groups
> running noncommercial email lists are being harmed by anti-spam
> techniques. The paper grew out of EFF's efforts to help MoveOn.org,
> human rights groups, parents' groups, and others, deliver email
> messages in the face of barriers that are aimed at stopping spam but
> that also stop wanted messages.

This is absolutely on purpose.  Collateral Damage is a necessary
technique to rid the net of spammers.  If you give money to a company
that facilitates spamming then you are no better than a spammer. Move
the damn website to an IP range owned by a company that does not spam.
Let the spam supporting service providers go broke because they have
no customers.

You will get no sympathy from me for having your mail dropped.  It is
the same as if you put a show about breast cancer on a hard core XXXX
rated pornography cable channel and had your message blocked by parental
controls.  If you don't think enough of your message to move it to a
clean area, you can feel free to roll it up tight and shove it where
the sun doesn't shine.  Right next to your head.

Hell hath no fury like a system admin who has to clean up after all
the spam.  And the virus attachments that turn clueless users into
spam relays.  There are four hundred virus infected attachments (18
different varieties of virus) and fifty one hundred spam messages in
my quarantine directory right now.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: EFF: Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech
Date: 18 Nov 2004 11:18:23 -0500
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


In article <telecom23.552.5@telecom-digest.org>,
Monty Solomon  <monty@roscom.com> wrote:

>EFF White Paper Reports on Collateral Damage to Free Expression in
>the Fight Against Spam

>  = http://eff.org/news/archives/2004_11.php#002097
>  = http://www.eff.org/wp/?f=SpamCollateralDamage.html
>  = http://www.eff.org/wp/SpamCollateralDamage.pdf

This is undoubtedly one of the worst-written discussions on this
subject that I have encountered.  Much as I respect the EFF, I think
they really need to get someone over there that understands the issues
today.

Currently, there are valid and legitimate ways to run opt-in mailing
lists.  It's difficult.  It's a lot of work.  Mr. Townson can attest
to how much overhead is involved and the importance of careful address
confirmation.

The fact that the MoveOn crew didn't want to run a list properly, the
way everyone else has been doing for quite a few years now, this is
the issue.  This is not a free speech issue by any stretch of the
imagination.

  --scott -- "C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Actually, I gave up on trying to
maintain a mailing list long ago. Part of it was my own personal
head problems after the brain aneurysm, but much of it was the huge
(and I am not just complaining) amount of spam and viruses coming
through. Now it is handled by majordomo, and either you follow its
instructions and get automatically added or deleted from the mailing
list or you stay in whatever mode you were in. PAT]

------------------------------

From: famartin1@yahoo.com (Raymond C Martin Jr)
Subject: Re: TV Movie: Category 6 - Day of Destruction
Date: 17 Nov 2004 18:36:53 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Just an FYI, the entire meteorological community is laughing
hysterically at this movie ... it has no meteorological sense and the
physics simply don't exist in this movie.


Raymond C. Martin, Jr.
Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/
New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/
Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: By the time the second and concluding
part of the movie was finished Wednesday evening, I was beginning to
feel the same way. I do not know if it is possible or even likely for
all those conditions to merge in one place at one time or not, but
even one or two of them, if severe enough, could cause a lot of havoc
and problems. PAT]

------------------------------

Subject: Re: TV Movie: Category 6 - Day of Destruction
Reply-To: jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu
Organization: University of Arkansas Alumni
From: haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 05:23:23 GMT


In article <telecom23.548.7@telecom-digest.org>,
Paul A Lee  <palee@riteaid.com> wrote:

> minutes, I could no longer stand the smell of the hackneyed "evil
> conspiracy of huge corporations causing or taking advantage of natural
> disasters to destroy humanity for their own profit" plotline.

What do you suppose Enron would do in such a situation?

jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

------------------------------

From: Gene S. Berkowitz <first.last@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:03:21 -0500


In article <telecom23.553.10@telecom-digest.org>, 
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com says:

> DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
> news:<telecom23.547.7@telecom-digest.org>:

>> Walmart is consistently the cheapest on those products, for example.

> What will you do when, no longer able to squeeze its employees or
> suppliers, it starts squeezing you by lowering the quality?

What do you mean, "when"? Wal-Mart has for years negotiated with
manufacturers to produce exclusive versions of hundreds of products
in order to meet specific price and cost targets.

--Gene

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits
Date: 18 Nov 2004 11:13:16 -0500
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


Mark Reichert <Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com> wrote:

> DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
> news:<telecom23.547.7@telecom-digest.org>:

>> Walmart is consistently the cheapest on those products, for example.

> What will you do when, no longer able to squeeze its employees or
> suppliers, it starts squeezing you by lowering the quality?

That's been going on for years now.  And from what I can see, what
consumers mostly do is put up with it.

 --scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Or many of us simply choose to do our
shopping 'downtown' whenever possible. I would never claim I have
never shopped at Walmart, but given a choice in the matter, I tend to
go downtown (which I would pass through otherwise [living east side
of Independence] before taking the cab all the way out to Walmart
[which is far west side of town].) But the hair salon I go to for my 
haircuts is out in that area, about a block from the Walmart
complex; now and again I walk across Main Street over to Walmart to
look around; but not very often, and never for groceries. Sometimes a
couple dollars of little items if I need them bad enough.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits
Date: 18 Nov 2004 09:41:13 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com (Mark Reichert) wrote: 

> What will you do when, no longer able to squeeze its employees or
> suppliers, it starts squeezing you by lowering the quality?

Shop somewhere else.

The history of retailing (indeed all businesses) is filled
with survivors who adapted over time and failures who didn't.

There once was a hot chain of discount stores known as EJ Korvette.
They prospered for a while, but then made poor business decisions
and whithered away.  

In the supermarket world, A&P was once a major leading chain.
It's still around but far from being a leader.

We have a regional convenience store chain that is rooted in
iron foundaries.  

I could go on and on with examples from industry of long-time
companies that survive and prosper to this day and once prosperous
industry leaders that barely exist, if at all.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Maybe you read in the papers 
recently where K-Mart and Sears had merged, making the combined
thing now the third largest retail chain. Walmart has been watching
that closely. There was a K-Mart in the complex where Walmart is
located; Walmart drove them out of business two years ago. On the
other hand, Sears has been downtown for about fifty years, and say
they plan on staying. Our very first drug store chain (first for
here in s.e. Kansas at least) -- Walgreens -- is scheduled to open
in about six months; downtown -- praise God! -- on the corner of
9th and Maple Streets; the house owned at one point in time by
Alf Landon when he was governor of Kansas. They've been squabbling
for some time over the historical significance of that house, but
it now appears it is going to be moved and the corner cleared for
the new Walgreen's store.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: J Kelly <jkelly@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:59:35 -0600
Organization: http://newsguy.com
Reply-To: jkelly@newsguy.com


On 17 Nov 2004 15:50:19 -0800, Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com (Mark
Reichert) wrote:

> DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
> news:<telecom23.547.7@telecom-digest.org>:

>> Walmart is consistently the cheapest on those products, for example.

> What will you do when, no longer able to squeeze its employees or
> suppliers, it starts squeezing you by lowering the quality?

They already have lowered the quality.

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:14:02 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


In message <telecom23.553.10@telecom-digest.org>
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com (Mark Reichert) wrote:

>> Walmart is consistently the cheapest on those products, for example.

> What will you do when, no longer able to squeeze its employees or
> suppliers, it starts squeezing you by lowering the quality?

Start up a family run store for people pissed off at Walmart.

A fool and his money are soon popular.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: We have a lot of family owned
businesses downtown here, and at one point we had **four** major
grocery chains here (Safeway, Country Mart, Food Town and Dillons.)
Walmart managed to do them all in. The last one to go was County
Mart, at 10th and Myrtle; then that property stood vacant (a huge
store) for several months. Then even the Walmart haters had to go
to Walmart to get their groceries. About a year and a half ago,
a chain called Marvins out of Oklahoma took over the old Country
Mart store, and they are hanging in there.  PAT]

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Email Read in Automated Phone Call?
From: tom.horsley@att.net (Thomas A. Horsley)
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:10:53 GMT


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: If you are a subscriber to America 
> On Line, they offer a feature which allows you to use the phone to
> receive email by listening to it.  PAT]

So does (or at least did) AT&T Worldnet (it always struck me as the
stupidest technology I could imagine -- I vastly prefer email because
it doesn't need you to play phone tag with it, now they want to add
phone tag back to email :-).

>>==>> The *Best* political site <URL:http://www.vote-smart.org/> >>==+
      email: Tom.Horsley@worldnet.att.net icbm: Delray Beach, FL      |
<URL:http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley> Free Software and Politics <<==+

------------------------------

From: HotJobs@MicroSurvivor.com
Subject: Employment Opportunity: Do You Know a Telco Maintenance Expert?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 04:33:08 EST


Dear Business Professional,

You were referred to me by an Online Listing and I am contacting you
in regard to a well-paid part-time consulting opportunity to serve as
an "Expert Witness".
     
On behalf of my client, I am looking for Technology Experts in the
area of "outside plant telecommunications", with respect to aerial or
buried cable comprising copper wire, coax or fiber optics, that are
interested in serving as an "Expert Witnesses" for a prestigious
litigation case to possibly set precedence for the industry. The scope
of this project will require the ability to work on this case for up
to 100 hours over the course of the next three or four weeks. Here are
the details:

    Demonstrated at least 10-15 years of successful experience in the
    outside plant telecommunications industry (or related)

    Electrical Engineer and/or Telephone/Cable Technician.

    Electrical Engineer and/or Telephone/Cable Technician who has with
    repair methods for cut cables made of copper wire, coax or fiber
    optic materials.

    Knowledge of standard repair practices, tools used, timelines, etc.
    Ph.d. a plus but not a must.

    Testifying experience in a patent case; 

    Excellent communications skills for written, verbal, and
    one-on-one persuasion The goal is to consult our client as an equal
    partner and evaluate the case as an expert witness. The candidates
    will possibly meet executive teams of well know companies, partners of
    law firms and other interesting people beneficial to further advancing
    his career. The candidate may be located anywhere in the US to fulfill
    this consulting agreement.
      
Please provide quantified examples of your success, references, and
your relevant experience matching the above requirements ASAP. The
project start date would be immediately after selection of the
consultant.
     
If you know other experts that might also be interested in this
consulting opportunity, feel free to forward this announcement, and
let your friends know about it.  The selection process of consultants
to be interviewed will be based on the responses you provide with your
reply email. The start date for the interviews will follow immediately
after selection of the most appropriate consultants.
     
We are on an urgent timeline and honor a quick response to this
message. The Start date of the project is within a few days from now.
     
Thanks again and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Jorg Huser 
   
CEO / Founder
Micro Survivor, Inc.
Phone +1-408-690-2464
Fax   +1-408-516-9814
Email jorg@microsurvivor.com
     
Enabling Emerging Business
http://www.microsurvivor.com

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: Somewhat Off Topic But a Must Read
Date: 18 Nov 2004 06:51:08 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Jack Decker <jack-yahoogroups@withheld on request> wrote: 
 
> You should be very concerned when your elected representatives attempt
> to take away any of the rights you currently enjoy, but especially
> when it is done solely to benefit large mega-corporations who already
> feel they somehow deserve part of every paycheck you receive. 

Whenever a law is proposed that might benefit the business community,
it seems people quickly object on the grounds it will just help
megacorporations who don't need any help.  But this isn't true.

The business world consists of many different sized businesses.  Yes
there are the mega businesses, but there are also plenty of tiny and
small firms.  They have legitimate needs, too.

In this particular issue of copyright law, I am not too thrilled about
taking away "fair use" which I think greatly serves the public
interest.  However, it must be remembered that many copyright holders
are not megacorporations, but individuals who may have written but one
book or song and are fully entitled to receive the benefits of their
effort.

An example of bad protests is the bankruptcy issue.  The bankruptcy
laws were revised some years ago and made too lenient.  People say
those laws shouldn't be changed because otherwise the big banks would
benefit.  But they don't realize many small business people are also
hurt by customers who file for bankruptcy and don't pay their bills.

In the case of megacorporations, the solution is to break them up
under anti-trust laws and not allow their formation in the first
place.  Wal-Mart shouldn't be allowed in the grocery business and
should be limited in how many of their stores are in a given commerce
zone to allow for other stores, to give one example.  K-Mart and Sears
should not be allowed to merge.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: K-Mart (remember when it used to be 
the 'dime store' Kresge's?) and Sears (remember when it used to be
known as 'Sears and Roebuck' ?) in fact have merged. Walmart is not
at all pleased about it.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: T. Sean Weintz <strap@hanh-ct.org>
Subject: Looking For VOIP Provider That Can Do Business With Government
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:13:23 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


I work for a small government agency. I am trying to get a VOIP line
that has unlimited long distance - my choices would seem to be quite
varied out there. Here is the rub, however:

ALL of them seem to insist on billing for federal excise tax. Under
law, we cannot pay that. None of the VOIP providers I have spoken to
so far (Vonage, broadvoice, p8) are willing to bend on this at
all. Their billing depts tell me they are not set up to deal with tax
exempt customers.

Does anyone know of a VOIP line provider with an unlimited long
distance plan that can accomodate us?

(do not reply via email - the return address of this post goes to a
spam trap account)

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Take your choice of them; personally
I suggest Vonage.  If your volume of business is of any value to them
(and I think it might be), they'll figure out a way to write off the
'tax' they think is due. PAT]

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Vonage Tech Support Dead?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:14:03 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


In message <telecom23.553.9@telecom-digest.org> Tony P.
<kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net> wrote:

> I've had no problems getting a human the two times I've had to call
> Vonage. But the hold times are on the high side.

> On my last call to them I waited for 45 minutes before getting a human 
> being. 

I've never had problems before.  I don't mind hold time, I have a good
speakerphone, but this time I can't even get into the hold queue.

A fool and his money are soon popular.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #554
******************************
