From editor@telecom-digest.org Wed Nov 17 20:17:23 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id iAI1HMW02057;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:17:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:17:23 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200411180117.iAI1HMW02057@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #552

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:17:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 552

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Film Trade Group Files Anti-Piracy Suits (Monty Solomon)
    Bank of America: Aiming Higher (Monty Solomon)
    The Drive's on For Digital Radio (Monty Solomon)
    In Texas, 28,000 Students Test an Electronic Eye (Monty Solomon)
    Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech (Monty Solomon)
    Motorola Further Expands Global Support for MediaCipher (Monty Solomon)
    SBC to Announce TV Deal With Microsoft (Telecom dailyLead From USTA)
    VMWI Questions About SDT and FSK (Bryan Apple)
    SBC Plans to Roll Out Internet Phone Service in 2005 (Lisa Minter)
    Andy Abramson: SBC Seems to Be Hedging (Lisa Minter)
    Somewhat Off Topic But a Must Read (Jack Decker)
    Email Read in Automated Phone Call? (Karim T)
    Soyo IP Phone (nightsurfer)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:53:43 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Film Trade Group Files Anti-Piracy Suits


By GARY GENTILE AP Business Writer

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A trade group representing seven major movie
studios filed a first wave of lawsuits against individuals they say
are offering pirated copies of films using Internet-based peer-to-peer
file-sharing programs.

As part of a larger effort to combat piracy, The Motion Picture
Association of America also said it would soon make available a
computer program that sniffs out movie and music files on a user's
computer as well as any installed file-sharing programs.

The MPAA announced the federal court suits Tuesday, but did not say
how many defendants were sued or where the lawsuits were filed. The
group also did not immediately make available a copy of the complaint.

One lawsuit, obtained by The Associated Press, targets 18 individuals
and was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri in St. Louis.

Other lawsuits are believed to have been filed in New York,
Philadelphia and other areas with large concentrations of high-speed
Internet customers. Such connections are required to download the
massive movie files.

      - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=45063818

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:41:06 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Bank of America: Aiming Higher


By Mel Duvall

Bank of America spent $47 billion to acquire FleetBoston to get a
stout presence in New England and New York. The bank will spend tens
of millions to convert its 1,500 branches onto its Model Bank
platform, so it can provide the same services nationwide. But previous
conversions have not gone well. Can it really become a bank of all
America?

http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1397,1720795,00.asp

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:38:21 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: The Drive's on For Digital Radio


By Bill Griffith  |  November 14, 2004

Outside of replacing tubes with transistors, it's the first major 
improvement in radio as we know it in 80 years.

High-definition radio is a technology that sneaked up on us. But it's 
about to go mainstream.

An HD radio broadcast offers CD-quality sound on the FM band and 
brings FM stereo-quality sound to the AM band.

But the programming is exactly what we're used to getting for free, 
with commercials paying the freight.

At WBZ in Boston, where the broadcast end of the technology has been
up and running for a year, engineering manager Mark Manuelian said the
sound quality is remarkable.

http://www.boston.com/cars/articles/2004/11/14/the_drives_on_for_digital_radio/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:45:40 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: In Texas, 28,000 Students Test an Electronic Eye


By MATT RICHTEL

SPRING, Tex. - In front of her gated apartment complex, Courtney
Payne, a 9-year-old fourth grader with dark hair pulled tightly into a
ponytail, exits a yellow school bus. Moments later, her movement is
observed by Alan Bragg, the local police chief, standing in a
windowless control room more than a mile away.

Chief Bragg is not using video surveillance. Rather, he watches an
icon on a computer screen. The icon marks the spot on a map where
Courtney got off the bus, and, on a larger level, it represents the
latest in the convergence of technology and student security.

Hoping to prevent the loss of a child through kidnapping or more
innocent circumstances, a few schools have begun monitoring student
arrivals and departures using technology similar to that used to track
livestock and pallets of retail shipments.

Here in a growing middle- and working-class suburb just north of
Houston, the effort is undergoing its most ambitious test. The Spring
Independent School District is equipping 28,000 students with ID
badges containing computer chips that are read when the students get
on and off school buses. The information is fed automatically by
wireless phone to the police and school administrators.

In a variation on the concept, a Phoenix school district in November
is starting a project using fingerprint technology to track when and
where students get on and off buses. Last year, a charter school in
Buffalo began automating attendance counts with computerized ID badges
 -- one of the earliest examples of what educators said could become a
widespread trend.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/technology/17tag.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:51:36 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EFF: Anti-Spam Measures Block Free Speech


EFF White Paper Reports on Collateral Damage to Free Expression in
the Fight Against Spam

San Francisco - Today the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
released a white paper (HTML - PDF) describing the effects of
anti-spam technologies on free speech. "Noncommercial Email Lists:
Collateral Damage in the Fight Against Spam" focuses on how groups
running noncommercial email lists are being harmed by anti-spam
techniques. The paper grew out of EFF's efforts to help MoveOn.org,
human rights groups, parents' groups, and others, deliver email
messages in the face of barriers that are aimed at stopping spam but
that also stop wanted messages.

  = http://eff.org/news/archives/2004_11.php#002097
  = http://www.eff.org/wp/?f=SpamCollateralDamage.html
  = http://www.eff.org/wp/SpamCollateralDamage.pdf

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:46:14 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Motorola Further Expands Global Support for MediaCipher


     Technology, Announces First Chinese License Agreement with DVN
     Technology Limited

The Agreement Enables DVN to Deploy Digital Cable Set-Tops Using the
            Motorola Conditional Access Technology

BEIJING, Nov. 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Motorola, Inc. (NYSE:MOT)
today announced the signing of a MediaCipher(R) license agreement with
DVN Technology Limited, an affiliate of DVN (Holdings) Limited ("DVN",
HKSE stock code: 0500), China's leading technology services provider
of state-of-the-art digital TV broadcast platforms.  The agreement
will allow DVN to expand its customer base by creating new
opportunities with network operators that support the Motorola
MediaCipher conditional access technology.

By licensing its MediaCipher technology to DVN, Motorola is providing
a new opportunity for network operators to deploy advanced digital
set-tops with a secure conditional access system in China -- using
either an embedded or the SmartCard version of the MediaCipher
technology.  This greater choice in set-top selection will expand
opportunities available for consumers to experience digital video in
their homes.  Currently deployed in more than two thousand headends
worldwide, Motorola's MediaCipher technology is one of the industry's
most robust and secure conditional access technologies.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=45065804

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:51:28 EST
From: Telecom dailyLead From USTA <usta@dailylead.com>
Subject: SBC to Announce TV Deal With Microsoft


Telecom dailyLead from USTA
November 17, 2004
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=17564&l=2017006

TODAY'S HEADLINES

NEWS OF THE DAY
* SBC to announce TV deal with Microsoft
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* Motorola to acquire MeshNetworks
* Private equity firms make preliminary offer for Grupo Auna
* Verizon considers relocation
* Inside pole-climbing school
USTA SPOTLIGHT 
* USTA Webinar: Phone Facts & Telecom Trends, The 2005 Roadmap!
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
* Verizon Wireless offers "ring-back" tones
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Bush renominates Adelstein
* Film studios sue alleged Internet movie swappers

http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=17564&l=2017006
http://www.dailylead.com/usta/usta_passiton.jsp

Legal and Privacy information at http://www.dailylead.com/about/privacy_legal.jsp

SmartBrief, Inc.
1100 H ST NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20005

------------------------------

From: bha@offsite.com (Bryan Apple)
Subject: VMWI Questions About SDT and FSK
Date: 17 Nov 2004 10:57:36 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I have some questions about the proper implementation for VMWI.
Specifically, I have CallVantage VOIP with a DLINK DVG-1120M, but I
think this issue is somewhat generic.  I have posted some messages on
the VOIP forum at DSLreports.com, but they don't seem to be a very
technical bunch over there.  Maybe this group has some old-time telco
folks that know how things are supposed to work!

In my  VOIP environment there are 3 parts to this.  The VOIP provider
also offers VoiceMail, and they send status messages to my TA
(telephone adapter) to control the VMWI and SDT.  The DLINK TA
provides the FXS interface to my phone, and it generates the FSK and
SDT based on the status as provided my the VOIP provider.  Effectively
it acts as the CO or PBX.  Finally, the phone must detect the SDT or
FSK and turn on/off the VMWI indicator.  I realize that different
phones may do this somewhat differently.

I believe that phones will only go off-hook on their own to check for
SDT under two circumstances: 1) after a call has been completed; 2)
after an un-answered ring.  But with FSK I would think the signaling
could be PUSHED down the phone line at any time (as long as the line
is idle).

My problem is that my DLINK TA will only send the FSK to set/clear the
VMWI after the phone has gone through an off-hook->idle cycle.  Of
course that would be the same requirement needed to detect SDT, so it
seems to me they have not implemented FSK very well.  This becomes
especially problematic when you can change the status remotely - by
dialing into VM from another phone, or accessing via the web,
listening to VM, which then sends the status change to the TA, but the
TA fails to pass that information along via an FSK signal.  This seems
wrong to me.

Do I have an accurate understanding of SDT and FSK signaling for VMWI?

Can anybody tell me if other implementations send FSK signaling
independent of a SDT detection event?

What do Telcos that offer VM do?
What about PBX's?
What about other VOIP adapters?

Details of a little test I performed:
1) Call comes in to CallVantage, they notify the TA with CRCX (hd), TA
says OK;

2) No answer, DLCX, TA says OK, RQNT(hd), TA says OK;

3) Caller leaves message and CallVantage notifies TA with RQNT
S=vmwi(+), not sure why but they send this again, TA says OK;

4) I waited for at least 5 min, the TA never put the FSK signal on the
local line to turn on the VMWI;

5) I pick up the local phone, hear the SDT, after hanging up the FSK
signal is put on the line;

6) TA sends NTFY, they say OK, they say RQNT, TA says OK, they say
MDCX with S=mwi, TA says OK;

Same after the VM has been cleared (I deleted it via the web
interface);

7) CallVantage sends RQNT S=vmwi(-), TA says OK;

8) I wait at least 5 min, the TA never put the FSK signal on the local
line to turn off the VMWI;

9) I pick up the phone, SDT is gone, after hanging up the FSK signal
is put on the line.


bha

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:17:39 -0500
Subject: SBC Plans to Roll Out Internet Phone Service in 2005


http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0411170321nov17,1,4327377.story?coll=chi-business-hed

By Rob Kaiser, [Chicago] Tribune staff reporter. Bloomberg News
contributed to this report

Responding to competitive threats to its core business, SBC
Communications Inc. said Tuesday it will begin offering Internet-based
phone service early next year.

The service, which would only be available to the company's DSL
customers, comes as rival carriers Verizon, AT&T and newcomers like
Vonage roll out similar services known as VoIP, for voice over
Internet protocol.

"We understand that IP is the future," SBC Chief Executive Edward
Whitacre said Tuesday at an industry conference in New York.

By offering Internet phone service, SBC hopes to keep competitors from
poaching its customers with lower prices and new features such as the
ability to block calls, receive voice mails as e-mails and set call
forwarding instructions from any Web connection.

SBC said Tuesday it will offer the service in the 13 states it serves,
including Illinois.

The company, which already offers Internet phone service to
businesses, is running trials for residential service in Chicago, Los
Angeles, Dallas and San Antonio. It did not disclose how much its
service will cost, although rivals charge between $20 and $40 a month
for unlimited local and long-distance calls.

[Comment: SBC is still thinking like a big phone company.  Why only
offer the service to their own DSL customers?  That's just giving
business away to other companies that have more ubiquitous coverage.]

Full story at:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0411170321nov17,1,4327377.story?coll=chi-business-hed

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:39:49 -0500
Subject: Andy Abramson: SBC Seems to Be Hedging


This is from Andy Abramson's blog, at:
http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2004/11/sbc_seems_to_be.html

In what is clearly meant to be both a hedge against losing money to
VoIP competitors by slowing them down by charging them more, SBC has
also at the same time made a move that could potentially make their
VoIP service less costly.

In a tariff filing today, SBC wants to charge ISP's more if they
terminate calls on their network according to a report from The Wall
Street Journal.
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110065122384576170-search,00.html?collection=wsjie%2F30day&vql_string=sbc%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%29
(Subscription Required)

Sadly, this is so typical from a company that seeks total control and
ownership of the pipe and the customer and which sees their
competition not being the other telcos and next generation VoIP
providers, but also the cable MSOs.

Yesterday I called all this an arms race. Now it's turning into
economic warfare as well. Smartly, FCC Chairman Michael Powell has
already announced he's looking into this. Don't also be surprised if
this is also bargaining chip by SBC to establish some preferred
provider relationships with ISP's and MSO's to get more of the data
traffic as well as voice calls moving over their networks. While Level
3, MCI, Qwest, Broadwing and AT&T have significant if not the most
traffic, SBC has also built out their own IP network, and that's a
network that needs filling up. It would not be out of the realm of
possbility that companies working with SBC get some sort of incentives
and all this is a rouse to get them there ...

In the meantime it's important that all of the VOIP companies and the
ISP's band together to work to stop what is meant to be clearly
another square on SBC's Monopoly Board game.

------------------------------

From: Jack Decker <jack-yahoogroups@withheld on request>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:55:47 -0500
Subject: Somewhat Off Topic But a Must Read


Folks,

You need to read this article:
http://wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,65704,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2

Issues related to TiVO and file sharing networks aside, please note
that if "fair use" is ever legislated out of existence, many of the
web pages and news sources you depend on will disappear, including
much of the content of this mailing list.  As you know, I often post
excerpts from an article to permit you to decide if the entire article
is worth reading, or to highlight one or two important points made in
the article.  If "fair use" ceases to exist, I might or might not be
allowed to post links to the articles but I wouldn't be able to quote
any portion of the articles, so I probably wouldn't bother at all.

You should be very concerned when your elected representatives attempt
to take away any of the rights you currently enjoy, but especially
when it is done solely to benefit large mega-corporations who already
feel they somehow deserve part of every paycheck you receive. For many
years I have been opposed to the practices of telephone monopolies but
it appears that congress may be about to create a new privileged class
of corporations, namely those large enough to buy politicians (which
are now apparently acting as mere puppets for these industries - not
all of them, but if enough do it then the big corporations get their
way, and we lose even more of our rights and freedoms).

In addition to the article I linked to above, there is commentary on
BroadbandReports.com here: http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/56780

On a somewhat personal note, I actually wonder why I still bother
doing things like this (posting news to these groups) sometimes -- in a
way I feel like we are all arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Of course I hope I am wrong, and if I didn't have that hope I would
have probably stopped doing this months ago. And if I told you why I
would believe something like that, some of you would question my
sanity and others (those who DON'T believe everything they hear on
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and FOX) might wonder why it took me so long to
wake up.  But since this isn't a political or social forum, I'll stop
there and say no more.

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: karimatmariano@yahoo.com (Karim T)
Subject: Email Read in Automated Phone Call?
Date: 16 Nov 2004 21:42:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Does the following technology exist:

When someone sends an email to me, I want to receive a phone call
which reads out the content of the email.

Thanks guys!


Karim T

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: If you are a subscriber to America 
On Line, they offer a feature which allows you to use the phone to
receive email by listening to it.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: stevem@soyousa.com (nightsurfer)
Subject: Soyo IP Phone
Date: 16 Nov 2004 16:36:52 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Z-Connect Telephone: The only VoIP telephone solution with zero
monthly fees and 150 ready-to-use FREE minutes!

Start saving money now on local, long-distance and international calls
with SOYO's Z-Connect VoIP telephone. Simply plug the Z-Connect phone
into your high-speed DSL or cable modem connection for instant
broadband capabilities, with zero monthly fees, zero set-up fees, zero
service contracts, zero software configuration and zero hidden
charges. No computer or adapter is necessary, and the first 150
minutes of airtime are free. Peer-to-peer calling is always free, and
extremely low rates are offered for local, long-distance and
international calls.

shop.soyousa.com

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #552
******************************
