From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Oct 21 17:11:15 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i9LLBEJ02969;
	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200410212111.i9LLBEJ02969@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #504

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:11:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 504

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    SBC Communications Reports Strong Third-Quarter Results, (Monty Solomon)
    AT&T Announces Third-Quarter 2004 Earnings (Monty Solomon)
    Online Intrusion Risks Large Identity Cache (Monty Solomon)
    XM Satellite Radio Confirms Deal With MLB (Monty Solomon)
    Multi-link SR3 and Caller ID? (Richard Coutts)
    Who Carries TV Signals and Long Distance - Today? (Lisa Hancock)
    Yet Another Telco Tax Proposed (Danny Burstein)
    Re: Old Stock Quotation Things? (Reed)
    Re: Old Stock Quotation Things? (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Privacy Eroding, Bit by Byte (Wesrock@aol.com)
    Re: Vonage Upgrades Local Unlimited Calling Plan to Premium (Dave Close)
    Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer (Bruce Bergman)
    Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer (Juan A. Monico)
    Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer (palee@riteaid)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:26:41 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: SBC Communications Reports Strong Third-Quarter Results,


     Accelerates DSL Gains, Delivers Second Consecutive Quarter of
     Revenue Growth

SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 21, 2004--SBC Communications
Inc. (NYSE:SBC):

    --  Reported third-quarter earnings of $0.63 per diluted share,
        $0.38 per diluted share from continuing operations

    --  Wireline revenues up 1.7 percent, consumer wireline revenues
        up 2.8 percent

    --  Average monthly revenues per consumer retail line up 9.2
        percent, driven by success in bundling

    --  402,000 DSL lines added in the quarter, up 28 percent from
        gain in second quarter, to 4.7 million

    --  Strong long distance growth, with 1.3 million lines added in
        the quarter to reach 19.8 million in service

    --  Continued progress in large-business market, with more than
        450 contracts of $1 million or more signed this year

    --  16.5 percent operating income margin, above the range provided
        in company's full-year outlook

SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE:SBC) today reported strong third-quarter
results driven by the continued success of its bundling strategy and
by solid momentum in key growth products such as DSL and long
distance.

SBC reported third-quarter 2004 earnings of $2.1 billion, or $0.63 per
diluted share, and earnings from continuing operations of $1.2
billion, or $0.38 per diluted share. Reported revenues from continuing
operations grew 1.4 percent, and revenues including proportionate
results from Cingular Wireless grew 2.1 percent.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44423705

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:27:27 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: AT&T Announces Third-Quarter 2004 Earnings


BEDMINSTER, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 21, 2004--AT&T (NYSE:T)

    --  Consolidated revenue of $7.6 billion

    --  Third-quarter loss per diluted share of $8.95

    --  Adjusted earnings per diluted share of $0.75 - reflects lower
        depreciation due to asset impairment

AT&T (NYSE:T) today reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, or $8.95 per
diluted share, for the third quarter of 2004. The company's
current-quarter net loss includes non-cash asset impairment charges,
as well as net restructuring and other charges. This compares to net
income of $418 million, or earnings per diluted share of $0.53, in the
third quarter of 2003, which also included net restructuring and other
charges.

Excluding the asset impairment and net restructuring and other charges
and their associated tax benefits, adjusted net income for the quarter
was $593 million, or adjusted earnings per diluted share of $0.75. 
This includes an after-tax benefit from lower depreciation of $331
million, or $0.42 per diluted share, due to the asset impairment
charges. A reconciliation of reported earnings per diluted share to
adjusted earnings per diluted share is provided in the appendices on
page 11 of this document.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44422389

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:32:15 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Online Intrusion Risks Large Identity Cache


http://news.com.com/2100-1029-5420149.html

By Robert Lemos

An August intrusion into a social researcher's computer may mean that
more than a million Californians need to call the credit bureaus.

On Tuesday, the California Department of Social Services warned the
providers and recipients of the state's In Home Support Services
(IHSS) that their names, addresses, telephone numbers, Social Security
numbers and dates of birth may be circulating the Internet.  IHSS
allows individuals to get paid for providing in-home care to senior
citizens.

The warning comes after an unknown attacker slipped in through a
security hole in a social researcher's unsecured computer at the
University of California, Berkeley, on Aug. 1, perhaps making off with
1.4 million database records containing personal information.  The
researcher noticed the trespass on Aug. 30 and the university notified
the state in mid-September.

The California government's recommendations for potential victims of
the data theft underscore how little people can do to curb the illegal
use of their information. While putting credit accounts on fraud alert
may make it harder to co-opt financial accounts, forget trying to
change a Social Security number, the Department of Social Services
stated.

"There are drawbacks to doing so, since it may result in losing your
credit history, your academic records and professional degrees," the
department said in a statement. "The absence of any credit history
under a new SSN would make it difficult to get credit, continue
college, rent an apartment, open a bank account, get health
insurance... In most cases, getting a new SSN would not be a good
idea."

http://news.com.com/2100-1029-5420149.html

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:52:37 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: XM Satellite Radio Confirms Deal With MLB


By ELLEN SIMON AP Business Writer

NEW YORK (AP) -- XM Satellite Radio announced an 11-year, $650 million
deal with Major League Baseball on Wednesday, the latest move in a
costly race with rival Sirius Satellite Radio, which earlier this
month signed a five-year, $500 million deal with shock jock Howard
Stern.

Both companies, which have lost a combined $2.5 billion in the last 12
years, are making investments in big-name radio personalities and
big-league sports in the hope that they can quickly boost the number
of paying customers before the bills for those services come due.

And in the tussle between the two companies, XM has the early lead.
It now has 2.5 million subscribers who pay $9.95 a month for 130
channels of music and talk radio via satellite receivers. That
compares to 700,000 subscribers paying Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.
$12.95 a month for 120 channels.

      - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44413528

------------------------------

From: rcoutts@comcast.net (Richard Coutts)
Subject: Multi-link SR3 and Caller ID?
Date: 21 Oct 2004 09:39:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I've been using a Command Communications ASAP DR401 for routing three
distinctive ring lines -- one for my home number, one for my business
number, and one for my fax.  It has worked great, but it filters out
the Caller ID (I can put a Caller ID device in series before the
DR401, but I really need at after the DR401, at each phone).  So, I'm
now looking for a device that doesn't filter out the Caller ID.

I'm looking at Multi-Link's SR3, but I can't find any information
online about how it handles Caller ID -- does it also filter out the
Caller ID info?  Also, what is Multi-Link's web page?  I haven't been
able to find it.

Thanks,

Rich

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Who Carries TV Signals and Long Distance -- Today?
Date: 21 Oct 2004 11:36:19 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Years ago, the Bell System carried network broadcast transmissions
from first radio and then television.  After WW II one of the
functions of the new coaxial cable and microwave systems was capacity
to carry TV signals.

With satellites and competing companies that own their own fibre
networks, does AT&T still carry broadcast transmissions today?  If
not, when did the transition start?  Was this a blow to AT&T revenues?

Likewise, who actually carries long distance telephone calls?  I use
Verizon, do they own their wholly own long distance network capability
of reaching any US central office?  What medium is typically used --
ground coax, microwave tower, satellite, fibre.

Or do all the other carriers simply contract in bulk with the
established AT&T, Sprint, and MCI?

With satellites, is there a problem with transmission lag time?

In 1970 AT&T descriptions, long distance routing had a triangle
design.  That is, most calls were sent to a toll center for subsequent
routing.  However, local exchanges had their own links to some nearby
exchanges.  For example, New York City to Newark NJ is "long distance"
since it crosses states and LATA boundaries, but is physically so
close calls be carried over plain copper interoffice trunks.  Are such
close LD calls still sent that way?  It would seem strange to bounce
10 mile call off of a satellite.

[public replies, please]

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Yet Another Telco Tax proposed
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:23:39 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


In the continuing tradition of government that try to offload taxes
onto third parties (that way they're not "raising taxes", you see ...)

California has a very real problem with medical costs. The hospitals
and other medical providers provide services, but don't take in
anywhere near as much money as they claim to be expending.

Hospital and medical finances are such a huge mess they put Enron to
shame. Normally this isn't a telecom issue but ...

The telco point: The usual folk have pushed forward a fee on telco 
services to cover the shortfall. Quoting from a VOA clip:

 	"A voter initiative that Doctor Higgins calls a "Band-Aid" could
 	provide a short-term fix, and he supports the measure. Appearing
 	on the November 2nd ballot as Proposition 67, it would raise 500
 	million dollars a year by adding a three-percent surcharge to the
 	cost for telephone calls made in California.

To which the curmodgeons retort:

 	"It's the wrong solution for a real problem. This is a phone tax.
 	This is a tax on a service that has absolutely nothing to do with
 	emergency medical care whatsoever.

 	http://ibb7.ibb.gov/newswire/2df1f60f.html

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
 		     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: Reed <reedh@rmi.net>
Subject: Re: Old Stock Quotation Things?
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:58:34 GMT


Jim Haynes wrote:

> I've been going through some patents from the 1930s.  Some of them are
> for systems to run a stock ticker tape through a projector.  I can
> understand that, as the forerunner of the Trans-Lux 'flipping ball'
> displays used in brokers' offices.  Some others use rotating number
> wheels to display the high, low, open, and closing prices of a single
> stock.  A bank of these could display data for several stocks; but
> still a very limited number chosen from the market as a whole.  What
> was the application, or audience, for this kind of display?  They are
> obviously a lot more costly than the projection scheme, both in the
> hardware and in the operation.  I presume an operator had to pick the
> selected stock trades from the ticker tape and send the data to the
> display board.

> jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

One such device was the "Quoteboard" by Ultronic Systems Corp. I
worked on these from 1969-1973 in the Chicago financial district.
They were installed mostly in commodity brokers, with some in stock
brokers offices. They were an electro-mechanical monster !  IIRC one
nest of modules would display 5 ticker symbols, and multiple nests
could be driven from 1 logic controller. Data was fed to the board at
1200b/s on a dedicated receive-only Bell 202 modem circuit, that
originated from the Ultronics data center near Philadelphia. They
combined all the raw market tickers into a special data stream just
for these boards. The modules had alphanumeric dials that could be set
by office personnel to select the ticker symbol they wanted to
display. The logic would decode the dials, then control stepper motors
to move a fabric loop, that had numbers printed on them, to display
the latest quote.

Ultronic also had 2 ticker tape display systems, similar to the T-L
Jet. They were all electronic, the older one used large NIXIE tubes
(Lectrascan), the newer used a matrix of neon bulbs (Ultrascan).

If you haven't already, see http://www.classicstockticker.com/ He
has pictures of various machines.

--reed

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: Old Stock Quotation Things?
Date: 20 Oct 2004 20:20:41 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes) wrote: 

> I've been going through some patents from the 1930s. ... What
> was the application, or audience, for this kind of display?  

I can't comment on the specifics, but some general observations:

First, keep in mind that many inventions that get patented are never
put into commercial production for a variety of reasons (too expensive
to make, too hard to make, no market, no investors, etc.).  The item
you found may be one of those.

Stock brokers used to have a public area (maybe still do) where
investors would sit and watch a projection of the ticker.  They often
had a news Teletype as well.  This is obviously one application.
Other financial institutions may need such devices for a large group
of people to see the stock ticker.

There are other applications in which a large group of people would
need up-to-date information.  One such place is the race track, where
both bettors and tellers need to see changing odds.  Another place
might be a railroad reservation office where clerks need to see space
availability on various trains.

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:38:02 EDT
Subject: Re: Privacy Eroding, Bit by Byte


In a message dated 19 Oct 2004 19:41:00 -0700 hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
(Lisa Hancock) writes:

>> ... And I think that up until the 1950's or so, most
>> everyone felt that way.  Then along came the pushers of credit cards,
>> and somehow we got to a point where it was just considered normal to
>> live beyond our means, while paying the credit card companies usurious
>> interest rates.

> Actually,  installment buying  has  been around  since  the 1920s  and
> widely  used by  consumers to  buy new  electric appliances  that were
> coming out in  those days.  Department stores had  charge codes and if
> you spread out your payments, your interest rates were high.

       Sears, Roebuck had a massive credit card operation which
generated more profit in many years than its retail operations.  It
goes back many generations.  Sears sold it to Citibank earlier this
year.

       Department store cards were prolific.  Aluminum plates (a
little smaller than today's plastic credit cards) called
"Charg-A-Plates" were used by department stores in many cities,
notched to show which of the participating stores you had accounts at.
If you opened an account at another store, they would punch another
notch on the plate on the spot.

       Multi-store credit cards became popular in the 1950s.  In
Dallas, the Highland Park State Bank Charge Plan was one of the first
in the country, and pitched small businesses with the proposition that
they bank could handle the credit for them cheaper than they could do
it themselves while giving them a wider range of prospective
customers.

        At the same time an affiliated bank started a similar plan in
Oak Cliff.  Texas Bank & Trust Company (a downtown bank) started the
competing "Texas Bank and Trust Company 'Charge-It' Plan.

        I was later told (shortly before it was bought out by some
mega-chain) that the Preston State Bank MasterCard was more
prestigious than an American Express gold card.  Since I'd had one
slmost since its inception (as the Highland Park State Bank) I never
had given it a thought.

       (The Highland Park [later Preston) State Bank plan and its
affiliate in Oak Cliff joined MasterCard; Texas Bank and Trust Company
jointed BankAmericard [now Visa].)


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Some of the stores also tried to 'cut
corners' on their charge account expenses by issuing *their own store
charge accounts' automatically to people who had planned to pay for
their purchase with a Visa/MC card. The store's assumption was 'if 
the person has been approved  by Visa/MC and their credit checking
system, then we do not have to waste time and money checking their
credit; Visa/MC already did that part (at their own expense!) for us.'
The store clerks were trained when someone came to the cash register
and proffered a Visa/MC card in payment, the store clerk was to say,
"Wouldn't you like one of our credit cards instead?" and if the
person agreed, the clerk would fill out an 'instant application' on
the spot, have the customer sign it, call the office and get a
credit limit established and a new account number assigned, usually
all in two or three minutes. The purchase would then be placed on
the *new, store account* rather than the Visa/MC card originally 
offered in payment. 

It was a gamble that usually worked pretty well for the stores until
Visa/MC started *doing it themselves* by setting up new Visa/MC
accounts with miniscule limits lower (in the event of a credit write
off) than what it cost Visa/MC to set up the account to begin
with. Capitol Financing and Aquistions (known by many folks as the
'What do you have in your wallet' CAP ONE people) are famous for it.
Anyone -- *literally anyone* -- can apply for and recieve a Cap One
Visa credit card with something like a $50 or $100 credit limit on
it. Any number of places now issue 'secured' Visa/MC cards; the
credit limits on which are 'secured' by an account in the bank
offering the card. Why bother to go to the trouble of an expensive
(and often times inaccurate) credit bureau report when the bank has
its hands on your security deposit/'savings account' anyway. Cap One's
attitude is if we lose fifty or a hundred dollars to find out the guy
is a deadbeat, we would have spent considerably more with a
traditional approval process. Pay your bill promptly, Cap One (and
the other Visa/MC operators doing this) will raise your limit up,
inch by inch. You call them, and ask if you can have a hundred dollars
more on your limit, as long as they have your phone number and you have
been paying on time, they'll raise your limit by one hundred dollars. 

So the department stores with their own charge account systems which
had been worshipping the almighty Visa/MC soon found out that having a
Visa/MC (or two, or three, or six) in your wallet meant nothing in
many cases. Then of course also came debit cards, in which your
'credit limit' is the amount you have in the bank at any given time,
and those were being passed off to store clerks as 'credit cards'. So
the person who presented a 'secured' Visa/MC or a 'ultra low limit'
Visa/MC or a 'debit card' Visa/MC knowing damn good and well it would
never get approved at the authorization center **if the clerk had
called it in, or swiped it**, knew that the clerk _would not call it
in_ and would instead offer them a new charge account from the store
instead. So the stores, in their effort to be 'penny-wise'
(intercepting Visa/MC purchases by offering an instant approval on a
new store account) were in fact 'pound-foolish' when several months
later the new account had aged-out to worthless and write-off time.
PAT]

------------------------------

From: dave@compata.com (Dave Close)
Subject: Re: Vonage Upgrades Local Unlimited Calling Plan to Premium
Date: 20 Oct 2004 20:55:57 -0700
Organization: Compata, Costa Mesa, California


I wrote:

> But this dialing plan makes Vonage essentially identical to Sprint
> PCS.  Dial as 7, 10, or 11 digits, as you like. But dialing 7 can be
> chancy since it isn't clear if they assume your home NPA or the one
> where you currently are located. (Of course, a cell phone doesn't need
> a time-out to determine number length.)

John McHarry <mcharryj@bellsouth.net> (and others) comment:

> I don't see how they could impute anything other than your home
> NPA. Your current IP address doesn't tell them much about where you
> are.

But I was referring to Sprint PCS. They may have a rule about 7-digit
numbers, but it isn't well known, so I consider them chancy since I
don't know which cell tower is handling my call.

I agree that Vonage and other VoIP carriers don't have the ambiguity.

Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA  "Politics is the business of getting
dave@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359    power and privilege without
dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu           possessing merit." - P. J. O'Rourke

------------------------------

From: Bruce L. Bergman <blbergman@withheld on Request>
Subject: Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:40:47 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


Pat:  "Withhold E-Mail Address" - just tell them that I'm on Earth and
Linked to it with a Net. (That should be obscure enough to fool the
harvester bots.) ;-) 

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: My mission is to 'let there be light'
> at least on *my sidewalk* through my backyard. My neighbor across
> the street has the same setup around his backyard swimming pool; he
> got his from the evil Walmart Superplace here in town. I got my set
> from the Episcopal Church rummage sale at a considerable savings
> last July.   PAT]

Okay, then it's time to do a bit of diagnosis of the Malibu Lights
system to see where the problem is, and get them back on.  (And I'm
sure that the readers that ever get stuck troubleshooting a complex
lighting system will find this /very/ interesting ...)

You'll need a DC voltmeter and/or a 12-volt test light.  You can get
a test light with a pin probe, a 12V lamp in the handle, and a ground
lead with clip at any decent auto parts store for a buck or two.

Disconnect the 12V output wires from the Malibu transformer, plug it
in, turn on the timer, and see if there is power at the output lugs.

The 88W Malibu brand transformer is not fused where you can repair
it, there's a self resetting (up to a point) circuit breaker but it's
hiding somewhere inside the potting compound.  The transformer is
dropped into the bottom half of the plastic case, and then polyester
resin and sand filler is poured in to encase it into a big block and
waterproof it, with only the wire leads sticking out.  After the resin
cures, they wire the timer and put the top on, box it and ship it.

If the output is dead with no load, the transformer is trash -- they
aren't kidding with the "No User Serviceable Parts Inside" sticker.

If you have 12 volts when the output leads from the transformer are
lifted, and it disappears when you touch the output leads to the lugs
for a second (with a nice little spark as you make and break the
connection) there's a short somewhere.

First, check the very end of the main 12-gauge SPT2 low voltage cord,
to see if the wires got shorted there.  (The wires need to be split
about an inch back, and then taped separately.)  Check any tap splices
or straight splices on the main lead, if the insulation job is bad the
two leads can touch there.

Then pull up the wire as it goes through the planters and flower beds
and look for shovel hits on the wire, that's a popular way to short
and kill the system.  (I think the wire magnetically attracts any
nearby shovels, but YMMV.)

If all else fails, it's inside one of the light fixtures.  Wires
burned and shorted together, lamp socket prongs bent to where they're
touching ...

Hooking up a series load lamp with the transformer output can
visibly show when you've found the problem.  You will need a high
wattage 12-volt lamp like a headlight or a fog light assembly - in the
50 to 100 watt range.  (Not much larger than the power source can
supply, or you will overload the transformer.)  One series lamp lead
to the transformer, the other one spliced to the light wiring.

With the short still on the system, the series lamp will be full
brightness and the landscape lights will all be out. Then start
disconnecting the light fixtures from the main lead one at a time.

When you clear the short the remaining good landscape lights will
start glowing dimly and the series lamp will dim noticeably -- Stop
Right There.  Whatever you moved was the bad connection.  ;-)

     --<< Bruce >>--

------------------------------

From: Juan A. Monico <juan@monico.org>
Subject: Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:01:54 -0700


On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:05:30 EDT, in comp.dcom.telecom you wrote:

> Here is a question for the group regards 'low voltage' electrical
> current. I have two transformers:

> One is Radio Shack, 'clean' DC output, 13.8 Volts at 3 Amps. Its
> like a little box, a 'powerhouse' kind of thing. It has a 'reset'
> button on the back in case the output goes out due to overload or
> a short. $39 at Radio Shack. I had been using it to run a small
> portable TV set and a scanner radio, such as would be plugged into
> a car cigarette lighter and run from a car battery.

> The other transformer is an Intermatic, model is 'Malibu 88-T' and
> it does output of 12 Volts and 1 Amp. It has a clock built in which
> allows it to be automatically turned on/off as desired. Its purpose
> is to service outside lights along a sidewalk for example. Using=20
> 12 or 14 gauge wire, a series of little lights strung over a distance
> of 50 feet will light up. Total wattage allowed is 88 Watts between
> all the bulbs, which are 5-10 watts each. It is available from Ace
> Hardware here in Indy also for $39.

>> Are these two power supplies interchangeable (ignoring the fact that
>> the Intermatic has a built in clock since I have other timers I can
>> use)?

>> How do you calculate volts/amps to watts?

>> I am not going to have $78 to spare this month (barely can spare $39
>> for one of them), so am curious to know what I can get away with or
>> not get away with. 

>> PAT

Hi Pat.

Please feel free to call me if you need more information.
Volts X Amps = Watts
This equation requires that the quantities be either all DC or all
AC.

Unfortunately you probably need two different units.

The light transformer is  just that, a transformer only. Ordinary
light bulbs will work on AC or DC. Normally these units provide AC
only.

The numbers you quote for the light transformer don't compute. For 88
watts it would have to provide at least (88watts/12volts)  7.4 amps.

At 1 amps  it could only supply 12 watts and with 10 watt light bulbs
it would  run out of capacity at 1bulb. Even with 5 watt bulbs it
could only handle 2 bulbs.

Their web page
http://www.absolutehome.com/web/catalog/product_detail.aspx?pid=16071
clearly rates the unit at 88 Watts so the 1amp figure you quote is
probably wrong.

So for this application you need a 12 volt AC transformer with at
least 7.4 amps capacity. Even though this is a simple device it will
be difficult to find a cheaper one off the shelf. One can be
constructed but will require some sort of enclosure for safety,

Now for your TV supply.

Most equipment rated for 13.8 volts DC will also work on 12 volts DC
since while the actual voltage from a fully charged automobile battery
is 13.8 volts DC it can and often does drop to less than 12 volts if
the charger isn't running.

All Electronics  (www.allelectronics.com) have a suitable unit:
Cat # PS-1242  12Volt DC 3.5 Amp Power Supply  $18.00
you may have to change the plug because of type, size or polarity.
This unit has automatic overvoltage and current protection so you
won't need the reset button.

They are a reliable Mail Order supplier of surplus equipment based in
California. I (and many other Ham Radio Operators) use them
frequently. Their shipping charges are reasonable and their service is
usually quick.

I hope this helps.

Juan A. Monico
15020 Ripple Rock Road
Campbell River, BC
CANADA V9H 1N9

Tel:         250-830-1088
ICBM:        50 09 36"N 125 22 19"W
Radio:       VA7MXA, N6MXA
GridSq:      CO70hd
Internet:    juan@monico.org

Politicians, like diapers, have to be changed frequently, and for the
very same reason.

------------------------------

From: palee@riteaid.com 
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:17:25 -0400 
Subject: Re: Help Me Identify/Repair/Replace a Power Transformer 


In TELECOM Digest V23 #500, TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson>
wrote (in part): 

> I have two transformers: One is Radio Shack, 'clean' DC output, 13.8
> Volts at 3 Amps.

> The other transformer is an Intermatic, model is 'Malibu 88-T' and
> it does output of 12 Volts and 1 Amp. ... Are these two power
> supplies interchangeable...?

The Radio Shack power supply is DC [direct current] at 13.8 V (the
output of a "12-volt" automotive charging system).

The Intermatic Malibu light power pack is simply an AC transformer
with a timer on the primary (line voltage) side. I think the "1 Amp"
rating you saw was the line side draw (120 VAC 1 A).

> How do you calculate volts/amps to watts? 

For DC, it's pretty simple for simple loads on a linear power supply,
which is almost certainly what the RS unit is: watts = volts x
amps.

AC calculations are trickier -- that's likely why Intermatic gives
their power consumption figures in watts (the 88-T is rated at 88
watts).

For a rough calculation, though, you start with 120 VAC at 1 amp (120
volt-= amps) supplying a 10:1 power transformer (120:12 volts) with a
typical transformer power factor of about 0.75 (0.733 in this case):

     120 V x 1 A = 120 VA x 0.7333 PF  88 watts (output)

When you calculate how many Malibu lights the 88-T will handle, power
factor is practically 1.0, since lamp filaments are almost pure
resistive load.

I'm not going to further flaunt how long it's been since I've done any
real AC calculations ...

Paul A Lee			Sr Telecom Engineer	<palee@riteaid.com>
Rite Aid Corporation	HL-IS-COM (Telecomm)	        V: +1 717 730-8355
30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, PA 17011-2410		F: +1 717 975-3789
P.O. Box 3165, Harrisburg, PA 17105-3165		W: +1 717 805-6208


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: My problem is *something* caused a
short on the line which caused the Malibu 88-T to get fried. That
something was probably the all-day drizzle/rain we had the other day
in the one spot where the cord strung to the various lights was not
properly protected. I will endeavor to find/correct that problem, but,
wouldn't it be good to put an external fuse in the line to prevent
that from happening in the future? I am thinking of one of the little
glass fuses and fuse holders  you can wire in series with the line.

I *assume* (correct me as needed) such a fuse in the line would stop
any short from reaching the Intermatic power supply. I would rather,
next time, blow one of the little five in a box for two dollars fuses
rather than be in bed asleep when the short develops (if in fact I
get it cured) and the Intermatic silently fries away all night until
I wake up, or worse, have my backyard shed burn down (unlikely, I
know). What are your thoughts?  What *size* fuse should I use of the
little glass ones  that fit in a holder from RS?  Not to small to not
allow the little lights to work correctly, but not too big so it won't
do a prompt job of stopping any shorts. Ideas?  PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #504
******************************
