From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Oct 14 16:03:08 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i9EK38A10177;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200410142003.i9EK38A10177@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #488

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:03:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 488

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Wired: Click Fraud Threatens Web (Lisa Minter)
    Re: LNP For a Move (Tony P.)
    Re: Verizon May Hang up on Plan to Sell Phone Number (Tony P.)
    Re: Why SCO's McBride Declared War (noname)
    EFFector 17.38: Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear (Monty Solomon)
    AT&T Introduces New Residential VoIP Plan (Monty Solomon)
    Nokia Reports Third-Quarter 2004 Net Sales of EUR 6 939 Mln (M. Solomon)
    Sony Ericsson Reports Continued Growth in Sales and Profit (M. Solomon)
    Roll Your Own Television Network Using Bittorrent (Monty Solomon)
    Intel Reveals First Entertainment PCs Signaling New Era (Monty Solomon)
    Motorola Home Monitoring and Control System (Monty Solomon)
    XSi - Xtreme Security Intelligence - Licenses and Deploys (M Solomon)
    Digital TV Finds It Hard to be Free (Monty Solomon)
    Making Peace with the Phone Bill (Monty Solomon)
    Pioneers Ready For Your Comments, Thoughts (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    Help Needed With 3-COM PCMCIA Ethernet Card (TELECOM Digest Editor)
    New York City [Verizon] Phone Users (NYC)
    Re: Monthly Bill Fatigue (Marcus Didius Falco)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:33:38 PDT
Subject: Click Fraud Threatens Web
From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>


Someone could make the argument that watchdogs have better things to
do. But click fraud -- endlessly clicking on ads to generate cash or
hurt a competitor -- is a serious threat to the web business, and no
one's doing much about it. Commentary by Adam L. Penenberg.

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,65324,00.html?tw=wn_story_mailer

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: LNP For a Move
Organization: ATCC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:55:02 GMT


In article <telecom23.443.11@telecom-digest.org>, vjkahler@bellsouth.net 
says:

> It can be done. BellSouth will do it, for businesses at least. I don't
> know about Verizon. Good luck finding a service rep who will know what
> you're talking about, and how to do it.

> What you're actually talking about is Foreign Central Office, where
> the original CO and the new CO are in the same rate center. In Foreign
> Exchange, the new CO is in a different rate center. LNP does make FCO
> obsolete, but not FX.

> Valerie in FL

The concept of LNP has shown FX service to be intentionally erroneous.
Same rate center means just that, the only technical difference is the
switch it lives on.

LNP does database dips. What else do you think the LNP fee on your
phone bill pays for?

FX is still used when you cross rate centers. But then unlimited
packages have pretty much killed that too.

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Verizon May Hang up on Plan to Sell Phone Number
Organization: ATCC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:56:03 GMT


In article <telecom23.73.5@telecom-digest.org>, 
stanncno1spam@noispam.yahoo.com says:

> Bidders Hot for Jenny's NYC Number
> Verizon may hang up on plan to sell 867-5309

> By Monty Phan
> STAFF WRITER

> Newsday (Long Island)
> February 14, 2004

> To all Manhattan women named Jenny: He's got your number.

> Combining the forces of '80s pop culture and offbeat Internet
> auctions, a Manhattan man is using eBay to try to sell 212-867-5309,
> the number -- sans area code -- that appears in the 1981 song
> "867-5309/Jenny," by one-hit wonder Tommy Tutone.

Interestingly enough -- Gem Pluming in Rhode Island is 401-867-5309. 

------------------------------

From: noname <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Why SCO's McBride Declared War
Organization: ATCC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:57:04 GMT


In article <telecom23.42.14@telecom-digest.org>, clj@panix.com says:

> Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> writes:

>> Online Extra: Why SCO's McBride Declared War

>> Says the CEO about Linux: "It wasn't like we said, 'Oh, let's go find
>> people and sue them.' It was a gradual enforcement of our rights"

>> You have to give SCO Group ( SCOX ) CEO Darl McBride credit for one
>> thing: He's got moxie.

> First, in what way was it NOT like they said "Oh, let's sue"?  Saying
> that that isn't what they did doesn't change the fact that what they
> did looks EXACTLY like that.

> And no, I don't have to give Darl McBride credit for ANYTHING if I
> don't want to.  He can't make me, and siccing lawyers indiscriminately
> won't change that fact.  How did he end up in this universe without a
> clue, anyway?

I have a very low opinion of those who use the courts and our
legislators to fatten their own pockets. McBride falls beneath my
contempt because of this.

SCO doesn't have a leg to stand on - this is a calculated risk to try
and inflate the value of the company. I highly doubt it will work
because SCO's credibility has been severely inhibited by it's
unwillingness to state exactly which lines of code are in violation,
if at all.

And in the 01/26/04 issue of eWeek I see that they've even testified
before our congress critters that open source software is a national
security issue. Their argument is that a scientist in North Korea
could download Linux, install it on a bunch of machines and cluster
them into a supercomputer for nuclear research.

The congress critters to their credit, explained that if proper export
controls were exercised this wouldn't be an issue.

But let's face it, North Korea will get what it wants from Japan, not 
the U.S. 

I hope SCO goes down in flames for this one. 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:38:38 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EFFector 17.38: Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear, But


EFFector  Vol. 17, No. 38  October 13, 2004  donna@eff.org

A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation
ISSN 1062-9424

In the 309th Issue of EFFector:

 * Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear, But Questions 
   Remain
 * In File-Sharing Witchhunts, RIAA Is Foiled Again
 * Entertainment Giants Push Supreme Court to Rewrite 
   Copyright Law
 * MiniLinks (12): DoJ Report Endorses PDEA, Induce Act
 * Administrivia

http://www.eff.org/effector/17/38.php

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:55:45 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: AT&T Introduces New Residential VoIP Plan


     AT&T Introduces New Residential VoIP Plan
Feature-rich Unlimited Local Service for $19.99 per month

BEDMINSTER, N.J., Oct. 14 /PRNewswire/ -- Providing customers a choice
in voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calling plans, AT&T today
introduced an unlimited local version of its popular residential
broadband phone service called AT&T CallVantageSM Local Plan.

For $19.99 per month, customers receive unlimited local calling and
access to the entire AT&T CallVantage Service advanced feature set.
All local toll and long distance calling in the U.S. and to Canada
will be billed at $0.04 a minute. International calling will be billed
by the minute at rates on average 50 percent less than the company's
leading offers. The new calling plan will become available October 17.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44262884

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:00:38 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Nokia Reports Third-Quarter 2004 Net Sales of EUR 6 939 Million,


Highlights Third Quarter 2004 (All Comparisons in Parentheses are to
Third Quarter 2003 Results Regrouped According to 2004 Organization)

ESPOO, Finland, October 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --

- Net sales increased 1% to EUR 6 939 million (EUR 6 874 million in Q3
2003), up 8% at constant currency

- Operating profit decreased 20% to EUR 928 million (EUR 1 154 million),
with operating margin of 13.4% (16.8%) EPS (diluted) was EUR 0.14 (EUR 0.17)
on net profits of EUR 660 million

- Mobile Phones net sales of EUR 4 429 million (EUR 5 118 million) were
13% lower than in 2003, with EUR 822 million operating profit (EUR 1 473
million) and operating margin of 18.6% (28.8%)

- Multimedia net sales increased 94% to EUR 914 million (EUR 471 million)

- Networks net sales grew 21% to EUR 1 470 million (EUR 1 217
million), with EUR 181 million operating profit (EUR 4 million) and an
operating margin of 12.3% (0.3%)

- Enterprise Solutions net sales increased 52% to EUR 172 million (EUR
113 million)

- Operating cash flow for the quarter was EUR 1.2 billion (EUR 1.2
billion) and overall cash position was EUR 11.8 billion (EUR 10.8
billion) at the end of the quarter

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44259933

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:01:46 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Sony Ericsson Reports Continued Growth in Sales and Profit


TOKYO & STOCKHOLM, Sweden--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 14, 2004--Sony
(NYSE:SNE) and Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERICY) today announced the
consolidated financial summary for the third quarter ended September
30, 2004 of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (Sony Ericsson),
the 50:50 joint venture of Sony and Ericsson.

Units shipped in the quarter reached 10.7 million, a 51% increase
compared to the same period last year. Sales for the quarter were Euro
1,678 million, representing a year-on-year increase of 29%. Income
before taxes was Euro 136 million and net income was Euro 90 million,
which represent year-on-year improvements of Euro 97 million (249%)
and Euro 28 million (45%) respectively.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44257858

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:52:53 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Roll Your Own Television Network Using Bittorrent


Posted by timothy on Tuesday October 05, @07:30PM from the
or-at-least-think-about-doing-so dept.

Cryofan writes "Mark Pesce, lecturer at the Australian Film Television
and Radio School (AFTRS) writes here and here about using p2p
networks, specifically bittorrent, to create a grassroots television
network. He cites as an example the BBC's "Flexible TV" internet
broadcasting model using that as the core of a "new sort of television
network, one which could harness the power of P2P distribution to
create a global television network." Producers of video entertainment
and news would provide a single copy of a program into the network of
P2P clients, and the p2p network peers distribute the content
themselves. 

Thus, a virtual 'newswiki' where the content is distributed bittorrent
using some sort of 'trusted peer' or moderator mechanisms as a
filtering/evaluation mechanism. So what is stopping anyone from doing
this now? Awareness of the concept, perhaps? Lack of broadband
connections? Lack of business models for content producers?"

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/05/2232203

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:56:47 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Intel Reveals First Entertainment PCs Signaling New Era


NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 14, 2004--In a keynote speech here
today, Intel Corporation executive Robert Crooke outlined products and
technology trends that will revolutionize the way people experience
entertainment in their homes. The company also unveiled several of the
first available Entertainment PCs.

Soaring sales of digital cameras, MP3 players, CD/DVD players, digital
TVs, personal video recorders and a slew of other digital devices
highlight the pervasiveness of digital entertainment.  Consumers who
want to enjoy this vast selection of digital content on their home TVs
and stereos now have an easier way to do so due to a new category of
PCs: the Entertainment PC.

The media "command center" of the digital home, Entertainment PCs are
designed to sit on an entertainment rack and work with a television
set with a remote control. The Entertainment PC combines the
functionality of home audio and video devices with the power of a
high-performance multimedia computer.

Easy to use, Entertainment PCs keep digital content in one convenient,
central location, accessible via remote control or wireless
keyboard. Entertainment PCs act as a combined CD/DVD player and
recorder, FM stereo and music server, and personal video recorder.  By
adding a broadband connection, an Entertainment PC becomes an
on-demand entertainment store, allowing users to download the latest
movies, music, news and more.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44262142

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:59:17 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Motorola Home Monitoring and Control System


     Stay Connected to Your Home: Introducing the Motorola Home
     Monitoring and Control System

NEW YORK CITY, Oct. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Motorola, Inc.
(NYSE:MOT) today announced the immediate availability of the Motorola
Home Monitoring and Control System from http://www.motorola.com/shop ,
and beginning November 1st from select retail outlets nationwide.

Keep Informed While You Are Away

The Motorola Home Monitoring and Control solution is a coordinated
system of wired and wireless cameras, wireless door/window sensors and
environmental devices that work together to provide real-time
information about what's happening in your home.

The included Home Monitoring and Control software provides an easy way
to configure and control the System. Right from the desktop, the
software lets you monitor real-time activity from cameras and sensors
placed around your home. You can program the software to automatically
record activity from these sensors whenever a certain event occurs
(such as a door opening), and/or have a notification sent to a mobile
phone or email account.

Further, you can program one device to trigger another, extending your
security options. For example, if a door or window sensor is
triggered, that event can enable a wireless camera to record the
event.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44260486

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:14:26 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: XSi - Xtreme Security Intelligence - Licenses and Deploys


     XSi - Xtreme Security Intelligence - Licenses and Deploys
     Advanced Homeland Security Solutions of the Next Generation of
     Technologies

IRVINE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 14, 2004--

   XSi(TM) Envisions Thousands of Robotic Cameras Enhancing Security
   Efforts Traditionally Limited by Cost and the Resources of Human
   Beings XSi, an IP-based security surveillance provider, announced
   today it will deploy the largest security surveillance network in the
   Americas. The company is also pleased to announce the recent licensing
   of its technologies in the states of Texas and New Mexico as part of
   its rollout.

   - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44264453

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:33:54 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Digital TV Finds It Hard to be Free


Broadcasters have spent billions on the technology -- but is free 
over-the-air digital TV a viable alternative to cable and satellite?

By Deborah Asbrand

FCC chairman Michael Powell's once-in-a-blue-moon halftime appearance
on ABC's Monday Night Football was a bid to publicize the commission's
new website promoting digital television. But Powell's cameo was also
notable for capturing the dilemma of broadcast DTV.  The push for
digital TV originated with broadcasters as a quest for a marketing
edge-a way to endow over-the-air offerings with features like
multicasting and on-demand programming and thus better compete with
cable and satellite. But with the decreasing importance of the
networks and their local affiliates, broadcast digital TV remains a
multibillion-dollar venture in search of an audience.

http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/10/wo_asbrand101404.asp

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:33:29 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Making Peace with the Phone Bill


Making Peace with the Phone Bill

Sure, long distance costs are way down, but the typical household now
spends vastly more on communications than before. MIT management
professor Thomas Malone explains why that's actually a good thing.

By Eric S. Brown

In his recent book, The Future of Work, Thomas Malone argues that
continuing reductions in the unit cost of communication are changing
the face of business, leading to decentralization, innovative use of
markets, and eventually, workplace democracy. (Yes, if you're lucky,
you'll soon be able to fire your boss.) Malone's book is an intriguing
vision of the future, and the extensive footnotes show he has done his
homework. Still, from the point of view of one of the "e-lancers" (he
co-invented the term in the late 1990s) who are driving the new "new"
economy, I had to ask: what lowered communications costs? Sure, if
you're a CFO, you may be thrilled that the cost of corporate voice and
data services continues to plummet, but if you're sitting at home, all
you see is one communications bill after another.

http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/10/wo_brown101304.asp

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:48:38 EDT
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@internet-pioneers.org>
Subject: Pioneers Ready For Your Comments, Thoughts


I mentioned the other day and want to remind you again that Internet
Pioneers is now open for your review and your postings. Originally
intended as a place for *long term* netizens to review the entries in
the Internet Historical Society, it is also a place for general
discussion of interest to netters; such things as changes we have seen
in the net over the past several years, etc. You can read through the
messages there presently at http://internet-pioneers.org and if you
want to post thoughts of your own, send them in email to us at
pioneers@internet-pioneeers.org

PAT

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:59:32 EDT
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org>


Most of you know I have a mish-mash of a network here, with a combination
of various *old* computers running Win 98 and Win-2000, and a NetGear
router. Here is today's dilemma:

My very old, original computer is a Toshiba 220 CDS laptop. It was
running with Win 95 until a few days ago. Dreadfully slow and small,
with only 123 megs processing speed, and 32,512 KB memory (circa
1995-96) when it booted up. Under Win 95, it was hooked into my
overall network with a 3-COM card, PCMCIA type, model 574-TX. (I think
that is a 16 bit card. ) It was working fine, the Toshiba could see
the internet, and the rest of the LAN as well.

I formatted the hard drive, and started over, to upgrade this computer
to a Win 98. All went pretty well, although it is still a very
sluggish, older computer. But, the 3-COM ethernet connection is not
working. I've tried installing it a few times, I have the driver for
it from 3-COM and the little green light on it tells me it is working
(the '100' is lighted. The computer toots when I remove or install the
hardware. Properties tells me the driver is correctly installed. The
icon for the slots tells me the 3-Com card is there.)  But, it just
won't work!  ipconfig and winipcfg both claim there is no card in the
slot. When I attempt to configure things to use the LAN instead of the
dialup modem (also a PCMCIA card in the slot right above the Ethernet
card) it won't be allowed. By the way, the modem PCMCIA card works
fine.

Anyone know why the ethernet card can see the network okay, but the
computer cannot see the ethernet card? (Well, it apparently can see
the card, it toots when the card goes in or out, etc.) I will 
appreciate any answers.

PAT

------------------------------

From: NOTvalid@surplus4actors.INFO (NYC)
Subject: New York City [Verizon] Phone Users
Date: 13 Oct 2004 21:46:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Desperate New York Telephone's death rattles are being heard. Oh wait
 ... didn't they change their name to ... NYnex ... Verizon, there's
one missing, [maybe hiding under a rock], it's hard to keep track. If
you are a Verizon customer look at your phone bill. Pay attention
now, or you will miss this.  Look at the page that has "ITEMIZED
CALLS" "Verizon Local calls" It used to itemize day, evening and
night calls and list a 40% discount for evening calls and a 65%
discount for night calls. The current bills still itemize day,
evening and night calls but no longer tell you what the discount rate
is. Pause and think. Why? To save paper? To save you from heady
accounting verification calculations? To save the elderly poor from
confusion? To make the bill easier to read? Nope! 

The real reason is, they DID AWAY with evening and night discounts!
Now all calls are the same price! Add up the "number of calls" column
and multiply by the "charge per call column". You will see that all
calls are charged at the FULL "charge per call" rate. Sneaky, huh? WHY
do the current bills still itemize day, evening and night calls if
there is no longer any discount rate and all calls cost the same? The
phone company is having a good laugh, Those of average intelligence
will never notice anything amiss.  For those of above average
intelligence, Telco [the telephone company] simply throws in a special
diversion. 

Have you noticed that the phone company now stuffs the envelopes
upside down? An intelligent person's wheels start whirring, Why is
Telco doing this? By the time the brain trust has figured out which
way is up, they have been too distracted to notice the wool being
pulled over their brains.  The local hardwired telcos are getting
desperate to slow down the revenue drain.  They are loosing customers
to wireless and VOIP. Some of those deals are not as good as they
seem. You have to examine all the fine print. Free nights and weekends
are not really "FREE", they are part of the plan that you are paying
for! Some VOIP plans have limited minutes included. You need broadband
[DSL, CATV etc.] for VOIP. You can't use a $4.95 a month ISP like we
do. You can still save a lot on some local calls by using a pre-paid
card with an 800#.  You can get a rate of under 3 cents a minute to
dial anywhere in the USA.  Since anywhere in the USA includes anywhere
within NYC itself, you can make local calls for 3 cents if it is a
quickie to ask store hours for example. 

After a while you don't save anymore, for long calls you don't use
this method. You can save a lot of money on telcom by choosing
alternate means. If you decide to try a pre-paid card for local
calling read all the fine print. They all charge extra to use from a
payphone. Some charge a connection fee for every call.  Some charge a
minimum call length. We use http://www.www.OneSuite.com for long
distance and some local calls. If you want to try them out Promotion
Code 034720367 will give you some extra minutes at no charge. Altho
you can call across the street or Georgia or California and even Hong
Kong for under three cents a minute, watch out! It costs twenty-five
cents a minute to Hawaii .

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:25:22 -0400
From: Marcus Didius Falco <falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Monthly Bill Fatigue 


At 09:00 PM 10/13/04, editor@telecom-digest.org wrote:

> From: DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net>
> Subject: Re: Monthly Bill Fatigue
> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:25:27 -0600
> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com

> Marcus Didius Falco wrote:

>> Businesses can only allow the general public to use their telephones
>> for free in places where there is no charge for local usage. This
>> might be the case in some countries, though I am not aware of any. In
>> most countries the telephone company charges businesses for usage
>> (even local usage), and businesses would have to pass on that charge.

> Canada and/or the US?

If I recall correctly, most big cities in US have measured usage for
business customers. I believe the same is true for Canada. In western
Europe nearly all users, residential or business, are charged for
usage.  Thus, businesses might be expected to pass on any costs to
members of the general public who they allow to use their phones.

I realize I was not clear when I said that small businesses in Egypt
allow the public to use their phones. I meant that they do so, but
charge a small fee.

------------------------------


TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #488
******************************
