From editor@telecom-digest.org Wed Oct 13 21:00:13 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i9E10Cn29303;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:00:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:00:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200410140100.i9E10Cn29303@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #487

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:59:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 487

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    HomePlug AV Specification Enters Final Stage (Monty Solomon)
    CheckHD.com - DTV Education Site (Monty Solomon)
    Targeted TV Advertising Catches Interest (Monty Solomon)
    Mobile Use a Health Problem? (David Clayton)
    Re: Cellphone Industry Turns to Unmined Territory: Seniors (kansasman)
    Re: Two Way Radio Service (Scott Dorsey)
    Re: Two Way Radio (jdj)
    Re: Deutsche Telekom AG Executives Reported To FBI For Abuse! (S Dorsey)
    Re: Monthly Bill Fatigue (DevilsPGD)
    Re: Law Hits Home (GL Fowler)
    Re: Basic Menu System Using VoIP? (John R. Covert)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:09:54 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: HomePlug AV Specification Enters Final Stage


HomePlug AV Specification Enters Final Stage; The First Global 
Specification for a 200-Mbps-class Powerline-Networking Technology is 
Now Ready for Final Industry Input

SAN RAMON, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 13, 2004--The HomePlug(R)
Powerline Alliance, Inc. is entering the final stage of the
specification development process for HomePlug AV, a technology poised
to change the way that HDTV, Digital Audio, and Internet access are
distributed around a home. The alliance has reached a significant
milestone by completing the advanced preliminary specification for
HomePlug AV, and is now inviting companies in the home networking,
consumer electronics, computing, and communications industries to join
the alliance and contribute to the final version of the specification.

http://finance.lycos.com/qc/news/story.aspx?story=200410131201_BWR__BW5336

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:14:32 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: CheckHD.com - DTV Education Site


Decisionmark Announces CheckHD.com: Complete Digital TV Consumer 
Education Resource

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 4, 2004--

     Powered by Decisionmark's Patented Technology, Free Site Helps
          Consumers Get Informed and into the DTV Retail Store

Decisionmark Corp. announced today that a cross-industry supported
digital television (DTV) education site, on the Internet at
www.CheckHD.com , is now available for consumer use. While the digital
broadcast signals reach just over 100 million American households,
according to Decisionmark, consumers are often unclear about the
benefits and availability of digital and high-definition television
(HDTV). With today's launch of CheckHD.com, consumers can easily find
straightforward, accurate answers to these fundamental questions: What
is digital TV?, Can I get digital TV?, and What do I need to get
digital TV?, helping the industry move more Americans closer to
purchasing a digital television.

This announcement comes on the heels of a separate announcement today
by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell regarding
a major FCC consumer education campaign. "A successful transition to
the world of high-quality, digital television requires a combination
of efforts from both industry and the government.  Websites like this
one, and the FCC's own site, will help consumers learn more about the
content and availability of digital programming," Chairman Powell
said.

A number of other organizations ranging from broadcast networks and
associations to the consumer electronics companies are in full support
of CheckHD.com. (See attached list of Quotes from Supporting Industry
Leaders.)

The site is loaded with clear DTV information, including a
comprehensive guide for DTV and HDTV channels and programming
broadcast to a consumer's exact location, which only Decisionmark
patented technology can provide. "Once consumers realize the vast
amount of HD and DTV programming available to them in over-the-air
broadcasts, cable and satellite, they'll be more likely to invest in
the new technology," said Jack Perry, President and CEO of
Decisionmark. "Part of the struggle up to this point has been getting
consumers to a place where they can find out if and when the digital
and HD content is available to them. CheckHD does that," he added.

CheckHD provides a one-of-a-kind, interactive, printable Buyer's Guide
that consumers can take to their local retailers, a great research
tool in the DTV shopping process. The Buyer's Guide comes complete
with customized information on the channels received, products of
interest, local retail locations and antenna recommendations. Once in
hand, the Buyer's Guide serves as a concise set of answers that the
retailer and consumer can review together, answers they wouldn't find
in any other single resource.

Completing the site is a guide to HDTV provided by the Consumer
Electronics Association. The section also includes high-definition and
digital TV Frequently Asked Questions, along with terms and
definitions. These information resources together allow a consumer at
any stage of the digital TV conversion process, from just interested
to wanting to buy a set, to access the information they need.

http://finance.lycos.com/qc/news/story.aspx?story=200410041400_BWR__BW5222

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:02:22 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Targeted TV Advertising Catches Interest


NEW YORK (AP) -- As the advertising industry worries about the
effectiveness of traditional television advertising, venture
capitalists are betting the 30-second spot has a bright future.

Since 2000, venture-capital firms have poured millions of dollars into
fledgling companies developing software designed to get America's
couch potatoes to watch TV ads. Television companies are starting to
roll out those services, which enable advertisers to broadcast
commercials tailored to specific groups of viewers.

With the technology, a New York car dealership, for instance, no
longer is limited to a one-size-fits all TV commercial. Instead, the
dealer can air ads for its luxury brands in an affluent neighborhood
such as Westchester, while marketing its lower-priced models in zip
codes where residents may have less purchasing power.

In the next year or so, advertisers in some regions will be able to
use the technology to target individual households _ a sort of direct
marketing over TV. Depending on the company, it can be done on cable,
satellite or traditional broadcast television.

      - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44242372

------------------------------

From: David Clayton <dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com>
Subject: Mobile Use a Health Problem?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:46:52 +1000


 From http://theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/14/1097607336738.html

Long-term mobile use linked to benign tumours
Stockholm
  
Ten or more years of mobile phone use almost doubles the risk of
acoustic neuroma, or benign tumours on the auditory nerve, according
to a study published by the Swedish Institute of Environmental
Medicine (IMM) on Wednesday.

"The risk of acoustic neuroma was almost doubled for persons who
started to use their mobile phone at least 10 years prior to
diagnosis," IMM said in a statement.

"When the side of the head on which the phone was usually held was
taken into consideration, we found that the risk of acoustic neuroma
was almost four times higher on the same side as the phone was held,
and virtually normal on the other side," the institute added.

Some 150 acoustic neuroma patients and 600 healthy control subjects
participated in the study, which was the first Swedish report within
the so-called INTERPHONE study, an international collaboration
coordinated by the World Health Organisation's cancer research
institute IARC.

"The Swedish results need to be confirmed in additional studies before
firm conclusions can be drawn," IMM said.

Since only analogue (NMT) mobile phones had been in use for more than
10 years when the study was conducted, the institute emphasised that
it could not determine whether its research also reflected the use of
digital (GSM) mobile phones.

While non-cancerous, acoustic neuroma tumours that are not removed can
grow to sizes where they put pressure on the brain and become life
threatening.

AFP

Regards,

David Clayton, e-mail: dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(Remove the "XYZ." to reply)

Dilbert's words of wisdom #18: Never argue with an idiot. They drag
you down to their level then beat you with experience.

------------------------------

From: dog4dogg@yahoo.com (kansasman)
Subject: Re: Cellphone Industry Turns to Unmined Territory: Seniors
Date: 13 Oct 2004 14:16:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Marcus Didius Falco <falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.483.1@telecom-digest.org>:

> From the New York Times --
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/11/technology/11cell.html?oref=login

> By MATT RICHTEL

> Having equipped most adults and half of all teenagers with cellphones,
> the mobile phone industry is turning its attention to the last
> untapped demographic -- people over 65.

> But its dreams of collecting monthly subscription fees from
> grandparents talking to their grandchildren, retirees calling friends
> from their recreational vehicles or patients checking in with their
> doctors may exact a hefty and unexpected price. The mobile phone
> industry has roused the interest of AARP, the powerful lobby and
> advocacy group for older Americans.

> And AARP is not happy with what it has heard from its members:
> complaints about incomprehensible service contracts, confusing bills
> and dead zones that are not clearly marked on coverage maps. They are
> the same concerns that have been expressed for years by other consumer
> advocates, who now have a new champion in the 35-million-member AARP.

> We're hoping "to make the industry stand up and say, 'We've got to fix
> what's going on here,'" said Susan Weinstock, national coordinator,
> economic and utility issues, with AARP. 

> The group has already prompted the introduction of legislation in New
> York State that would provide more flexibility in canceling cellphone
> contracts, and it plans similar efforts in other states. AARP's
> campaign, which includes lobbying Congress, the Federal Communications
> Commission and state legislatures, and talk of running its own
> cellphone service, has caught the cellphone industry off guard and ill
> tempered. Consumer advocates say AARP's aggressiveness also reflects
> its own internal dynamics, that AARP is focusing on such a universally
> and easily agreed upon position to unite a membership angered and torn
> by the turmoil of last year's divisive Medicare fight. The cellphone
> industry has argued that it has done a good job of serving the needs
> of older customers and that what is best for people on fixed incomes
> is an industry free from taxation and regulation and thus,
> theoretically, able to offer lower prices.

"Gene Kimmelman, executive director of Consumers Union, publisher of
Consumer Reports magazine, said AARP had another motive -- getting its
own membership to take notice."  I am glad that seniors have an
organization that helps to defend members from possible price gaugers.

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Two Way Radio Service
Date: 13 Oct 2004 10:22:42 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


William Warren  <william_warren_nonoise@comcast.net> wrote:

> Users of trunked systems have the advantage of _not_ being on
> common-carrier frequencies, so there's little chance of being out of
> service during a mass-calling event, and they're insulated from price
> hikes during the duration of their contract with the consortium or
> aggregator. OTOH, they must buy and maintain expensive radios, can't
> operate outside of their assigned area, and have no way to hook the
> system up to the PSTN.

Actually, many of the trunking systems do have an autopatch feature,
where a simplex call can be patched to the PSTN.  It's rather
difficult to carry on a conversation this way, but it's an extremely
useful feature to have, especially in emergencies.

scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

From: jdj <jdj@now.here>
Subject: Re: Two Way Radio
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:28:25 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:16:01 -0400, Chris Farrar wrote:

>> Geller wrote:

>>> Is there any two-way radio service provider.? Can any one give me the
>>> list of service providers.??

> It depends if he is talking about Commercial two-way radios, involing
> repeaters or trunked service.  If your geographic area is big enough two
> individual radios won't have the range needed and you contract with XYZ
> Ltd. to provide you with radios & service, either using dedicated
> frequencies, PL tone squelch on shared frequencies, or on a trunked
> radio service.  Or you can go the Nextel route.  All of the above will
> cost money, either as a flat monthly fee or airtime minutes.

There are in fact people attempting to sell ordinary two-way radio as
if it were cellular. Most of these are cellular resellers. One of
these jokers tried to offer me a simplex setup with a pair of
one-channel UHF Kenwood HT's while I was trying to haggle on better
terms for cellular, which I rarely use. He had the nerve to put a
contract before me selling the radios for $300 each, and a $20.00
monthly subscription rate for 2 years.

For many people their first real exposure to two-way radio is a
cellular telephone. When someone comes along and offers a two-way
radio plan with "unlimited anytime minutes" for only $20.00 per month,
it seems to be a real bargain, even if the radios cost far more than a
phone.

> If someone is selling him a contract for 2 way radio, you need to know
> what is being provided, trunked service covering what area, or if on a
> dedicated frequency or using a shared frequency/PL Tone squelch, do they
> have enough repeaters to cover the area you expect to use the radio in.

Again, one must be familiar with radio and not just cellular, first.

I don't want to second-guess but it seems from the question asked that
he may be quite unfamiliar with two-way radio beyond cellular.

There was once a two-way radio FAQ/tutorial on some website. I do not
have the link anymore. Does anyone else?

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Deutsche Telekom AG Executives Reported To FBI For Abuse!
Date: 13 Oct 2004 10:20:40 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


Freespeechstore <freespeechstore@aol.com> wrote:

> FSS does not spam!  Anybody can make a report to antispammers ... a
> well documented fact.  The FSS email system works similar to the
> media, i.e. usatoday.com, but FSS has more controls, as well as
> instant and permanent opt-out! The site is not about negatively, but
> the speeches about such do get the most responses.  Posting is FREE.
> Come on in and say something positive!

I think a quick search of news.admin.net-abuse.sightings will prove
this incorrect.

scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

From: DevilsPGD <devilspgd@crazyhat.net>
Subject: Re: Monthly Bill Fatigue
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:25:27 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


Marcus Didius Falco wrote:

> Businesses can only allow the general public to use their telephones
> for free in places where there is no charge for local usage. This
> might be the case in some countries, though I am not aware of any. In
> most countries the telephone company charges businesses for usage
> (even local usage), and businesses would have to pass on that charge.

Canada and/or the US?

Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.  They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we.

  -- George W. Bush 08/05/2004

------------------------------

From: GL Fowler <kmas@brophy.com>
Subject: Re: Law Hits Home
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:46:10 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:51:46 GMT, William Warren
<william_warren_nonoise@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:37:52 EDT, Lisa Minter
> <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> by Anush Yegyazarian

>> A recent court decision on a 5-year-old case highlights the failure of
>> our laws to protect the privacy of personal e-mail.

>> Everyone (or almost everyone) knows that the e-mail you send and
>> receive at work, using your employer's computers and network, isn't
>> really private: The company and your boss have the right to both
>> monitor and read what you're sending and receiving. But if you're like
>> me, you probably thought that the Internet service provider you use at
>> home -- and by extension those who work there -- doesn't have the same
>> right. We're wrong: They do.

> The safest approach to this problem is the same one the military uses:
> they assume that everything transmitted electronically is fully open
> to everyone in the world, and employ appropriate levels of
> cryptography to secure information while in transit.

> In other words, go to http://www.thawte.com/email/index.html and get a
> free encryption certificate, which will allow you to receive encrypted
> emails using most email clients. If your correspondents do the same,
> you'll be able to encrypt things you send to them as well.

> You may also use GPG, and encrypt emails offline for inclusion in an email  
> (either inline or as an attachment). GPG is Open Source, and free:  
> http://www.gnupg.org/.

> John Ashcroft will thank you. The NSA will thank you.

> HTH.

> William

> (Filter noise from my email for direct replies.)

If I send a postcard to my Aunt in Texas should I have an expectation
that the postman won't read the card?

"The best proof of intelligent life in space is that it hasn't come
here."  - Sir Arthur C. Clarke

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:58:32 EDT
From: John R. Covert <nospamtd@covert.org>
Subject: Re: Basic Menu System Using VoIP?


James Bowery wrote:

> I need a basic touch tone menuing system that receives calls via
> ethernet port using VoIP.

This is trivial with Asterisk PBX, an Open Source PBX running on Linux
(and Mac and other U*x platforms).

> Call-back to purported Caller ID for spoofing prevention.

You might think about another way to do spoofing prevention.  If
someone spoofs YOU (and callerID spoofing is quite easy on VoIP), you
will place annoying callbacks to the spoofed numbers.

/john

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #487
******************************
