From editor@telecom-digest.org Tue Oct 5 13:21:13 2004 Received: (from ptownson@localhost) by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i95HLD522900; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:21:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:21:13 -0400 (EDT) From: editor@telecom-digest.org Message-Id: <200410051721.i95HLD522900@massis.lcs.mit.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f To: ptownson Approved: patsnewlist Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #470 TELECOM Digest Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:20:00 EDT Volume 23 : Issue 470 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson BlackBerry, Beloved Gadget, Continues to Thrive (Monty Solomon) AT&T Wireless Launching Music Service (Monty Solomon) AT&T Wireless Debuts First-Ever Mobile Music Store in US (Monty Solomon) The Broad Reach of Satellite Radio (Monty Solomon) A New Phone and Techie Controversy at Verizon (Monty Solomon) Policy Post 10.16: Senate Amendments Threaten Civil Liberties (Solomon) To the Patio and Beyond: Speakers Without Wires (Monty Solomon) Almost Here: Cellphones at 37,000 Feet (Monty Solomon) Bank of America Gets 180,000 VOIP Phones (Rick Merrill) Vonage Price Increase (Joe Hearn) How to Lower Volume on Panasonic KX-T7453 ASAP Help!! (Oscar) Boston: VoIP Technical Presentation (Boston Network Users Group) Re: Pennsylvania Railroad's Crew Communication System? (Robert Bonomi) Re: Pennsylvania Railroad's Crew Communication System? (Lisa Hancock) Re: Cascading Hubs (was Re: Voicepulse Disconnects Computer) (Landsberg) Re: Adding Ports to a Router (John Levine) Re: Wrong Address For 911 Caller a Tragic Ordeal (Isaiah Beard) All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 01:07:26 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: BlackBerry, Beloved Gadget, Continues to Thrive By IAN AUSTEN ABOUT a year ago, PalmOne was poised to challenge the dominance of the BlackBerry, the wireless e-mail device made by Research in Motion that has become the gadget of choice among celebrities and politicians. PalmOne seemed to have all the advantages. It had a customer base in the millions while BlackBerry users numbered in the hundreds of thousands. When it acquired Handspring, PalmOne acquired the Treo, a device that combined a BlackBerry-like e-mail device with a Palm-based hand-held computer, giving it all the extras that the Blackberry lacked, like games, cameras and music players. But somehow, the message did not make it through to BlackBerry's loyal fan base. Not only have sales of PalmOne's Treo lagged behind those of the BlackBerry, things have never been better for R.I.M. Last week R.I.M., based in Waterloo, Ontario, reported a 147 percent in second-quarter revenues, compared with the same period last year. After reaching a million BlackBerry subscribers in February, R.I.M. anticipates having two million by the end of the year. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/04/technology/04newcon.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 01:23:31 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: AT&T Wireless Launching Music Service By ALEX VEIGA AP Business Writer LOS ANGELES (AP) -- In the first foray by a U.S. wireless carrier into the online music market, AT&T Wireless is launching a service that lets subscribers buy songs using their cell phones and later download them to a computer. Until now, mobile music sales have centered on ringtones, the song snippets used to customize ringer and other sounds on mobile phones. At Tuesday's launch, mMode Music Store will offer roughly 750,000 tracks priced at 99 cents each. Full albums will start at $9.99. To buy songs on the service, an AT&T Wireless customer would use their phone's browser screen to search for tracks and, on some phones, listen to 30-second song samples. The mMode store will also sell ringtones. Purchases would be billed to users' monthly wireless phone bill, with customers downloading songs over the Internet from a Web site in the Windows Media Player format. The files and could then be burned onto CDs or transferred to portable digital players. - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44056747 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 01:24:40 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: AT&T Wireless Debuts First-Ever Mobile Music Store in the U.S. Service Turns the Mobile Phone Into a 'Remote Control' for PC Downloads Of Digital Music Tracks Millions of Customers Can Now Discover and Buy Their Favorite Music Right from Their Mobile Phone, and Have Purchases Billed Automatically to Their Monthly Statement or Credit Card SEATTLE, Oct. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Building on the success of the company's Music ID service, AT&T Wireless (NYSE:AWE) today announced the premier of the mMode(TM) Music Store, making the entire music discovery, sampling, and purchase process mobile for the first time in U.S. history. With the AT&T Wireless mMode(TM) Music Store, customers can discover, browse, listen to(*) and purchase digital music tracks from a library of approximately 750,000 songs -- all right from the handset. Built in cooperation with Loudeye and Microsoft, the mobile music store is seamlessly integrated with the PC, so digital music tracks are downloaded to users' Windows PCs and billed automatically to their monthly AT&T Wireless statement or credit card. For years, AT&T Wireless' mMode service has informed and entertained customers with some of the best-in-class applications available, from news and sports to gaming and dating. Today, the company turns up the volume on mobile music and significantly expands the functionality of the mobile phone to meet the insatiable demand for digital music. By tying to the company's popular Music ID service, when customers receive a text message with the name and artist of a song they've discovered while mobile, they can now click on a link to go straight to the AT&T Wireless mMode Music Store to buy that digital music track. - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=44056583 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 00:18:06 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: The Broad Reach of Satellite Radio By SABRINA TAVERNISE The personalities could not be more different. Bob Edwards, the radio host whose silky voice meant morning to millions of listeners across the country, was scheduled to begin broadcasting again this morning from a Washington, D.C., studio located an eighth of a mile from his former employer, National Public Radio. Just hours before, in a New York studio, the irreverent radio duo, Opie and Anthony, were due to start a new show, their first since 2002, when they were forced from their WNEW-FM program in New York City, after they broadcast a producer's live account, delivered via cellphone, of a couple who were purported to be having sex in St. Patrick's Cathedral. The new shows have one thing in common: They are being broadcast only on satellite radio, a new medium that became broadly available in the United States just three years ago. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/04/technology/04radio.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:12:24 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: A New Phone and Techie Controversy at Verizon FROM THE DESK OF DAVID POGUE Last week on "The Amazing Race for the Perfect Phone," Verizon Wireless announced that it was emerging from its cocoon of technological backwardness. At long last, the carrier with the best signal coverage began offering a full-featured flip phone with camera, voice dialing, speakerphone, memory card and Bluetooth: the new Motorola v710. Best coverage, great phone--what more could a gadget freak want? Unfortunately, Web sites and blogs are teeming with complaints about one particular aspect of the v710: it's crippled Bluetooth features. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/30/technology/circuits/30POGUE-EMAIL.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:32:23 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: Policy Post 10.16: Senate Amendments Threaten Civil Liberties CDT POLICY POST Volume 10, Number 16, October 4, 2004 A Briefing On Public Policy Issues Affecting Civil Liberties Online from The Center For Democracy and Technology (1) Senate Amendments Propose PATRIOT 2, Threaten Civil Liberties (2) Background: 9/11 Commission Legislation Has Serious Implications for Privacy and Civil Liberties (3) What Should -- and Should Not -- Be Part of the Intelligence Reform Legislation http://www.cdt.org/publications/pp_10.16.shtml. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:38:35 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: To the Patio and Beyond: Speakers Without Wires By DAVID POGUE FALL is in the air! Actually, fall isn't all. Along with the usual stuff (love, excitement, politics), the air is increasingly filled with wireless signals. The radio spectrum bursts with invisible waves from cellphones, cordless phones, computer networks, satellite dishes, radios and so on. There's so much wireless traffic in the air these days, it's a wonder you can even breathe. But electronics companies haven't finished going wireless just yet. They're still looking for other wires to eliminate, like the ones that connect to your stereo to your speakers. As it turns out, four companies - Sony, RCA, Advent and Acoustic Research -- make at least five different wireless speaker kits. (All right, Advent and Acoustic Research are only brand names marketed by RCA, whose parent, Thomson Electronics, inherited these product lines from Recoton, which went bankrupt this year -- don't worry, none of this will be on the final exam. The point is that in fact, these speaker sets actually come from only two companies, not four. But play along, will you?) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/30/technology/circuits/30stat.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:52:53 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: Almost Here: Cellphones at 37,000 Feet By JOE SHARKEY http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/05/business/05road.html ------------------------------ From: Rick Merrill Subject: Bank of America Gets 180,000 VOIP Phones Organization: Comcast Online Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:34:58 GMT http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1661700,00.asp ------------------------------ From: Joe Hearn Subject: Vonage Price Increase Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 03:58:42 GMT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net A copy of the following email was sent to Vonage Customer Care. To: Vonage Customer Care [billing@vonage.com] From: J H Hearn [ccis4sofi@spamfree.net] Subject: I have questions concerning a Rate Plan Change Telephone: XXX XXX XXXX Account Number: XXXXXXX Billing Invoice: invoice not yet recieved Hey, this isn't fair. You are charging me $10 to keep my same service level. I am a satisfied customer but I have been on the 500 minute plan for a year and a half. I have been paying $25 per month. I think that's great. But you shouldn't charge me an extra $10 to keep the same plan. You waived the charge to upgrade, reduced the charge for unlimited but charge me $10 to stay the same? That must have been a product management decision not one coming from sales department or customer support folks. Your company does a great job. Your service serves me particularly well. Most of my calls are local and only 200-300 minutes are out of my local area each month. Why would you penalize your 500 minute customers for keeping the same service. I hope you will re-think this policy. If we were not fee conscious why would we would we buy the 500 minute service in the first place? I'm not saying I am going to change VoIP providers over $10 but it sure irritates me and I'm not going to talk good about you for a long time. [Sender's Note] If they don't charge me the $10, I'll sent it + to the Digest. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Would you *please* send me whatever you received *from Vonage* which stated you would be billed this ten dollar fee? I am on most -- I think -- Vonage mailing lists and I have not seen or heard of such an increase (or single time fee) to users. If this in fact came from Vonage -- and that company is victimized by game players just as E-Bay and Pay Pal are, someone always wanting a response from netizens with card numbers, etc -- then I will be in touch with Mr. Citron about the matter. But I do not believe it is true. PAT] ------------------------------ From: ocarmona@orasysit.com (Oscar) Subject: How to Lower Volume on Panasonic KX-T7453 ASAP Help!! Date: 5 Oct 2004 06:36:38 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com HELP!! All I need is to know how to turn off the ringing or lower it and turn it on and raise it for the Panasonic KX-T7453 phone system. I don't want to spend so much money getting this done, please help!! We need this ASAP. ------------------------------ From: info@bnug.org (Boston Network Users Group) Subject: Boston: VoIP Technical Presentation Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:56:19 -0500 Organization: BNUG - http://www.bnug.org Of possible interest to those of you located in the greater Boston area: BNUG: BOSTON NETWORK USERS GROUP ------------------------------------ OCTOBER MONTHLY MEETING VOICE OVER I.P. (VoIP) NETWORKS THE TECHNOLOGY OF INTERNET TELEPHONY Join BNUG on Tuesday October 12 as we discuss the state-of-the-art Voice over IP (VoIP) technologies and practices. Our discussion will begin with a brief overview of the current state of telephony, then cover network transformation, concentrating on the latest technology available to enable Voice over IP. We'll cover technical considerations when implementing VoIP solutions, including transport protocols supporting VoIP today, data network preparedness, and voice quality considerations. The session will wrap up with a Q-and-A session and live demonstrations of VoIP using Nortel Networks VoIP equipment. Whether you're new to this VoIP thing and want to learn what it's all about, or you're an experienced VoIPer, you'll find this meeting informative, exciting, and very useful. VoIP is here to stay; come learn about and see for yourself the state of the industry. The meeting will be held starting at 6:30pm (for munchies/networking; meeting at 7pm) on October 12, 2004 at Nortel Networks' 600 Technology Park Drive, Billerica, MA office. For directions, visit http://www.bnug.org/nortel.htm. The meeting is free and reservations not necessary. Join us at Nortel Networks' office in at 600 Technology Park Drive in Billerica, Massachusetts, just off Concord Road near the intersection of Concord Road and Route 3. Beginning at 6:30 PM, meet old friends and make new ones over refreshments. The meeting will start at 7:00 PM and run no later than 9:00pm. For detailed directions, visit http://www.bnug.org/nortel.htm The meeting is free and reservations not necessary. BNUG meets the second Tuesday of every month. Our motto is "Free Stuff!" And in that sprit, our meetings and our membership dues are free -- and refreshments are served. If you wish to join, are interested in more information, or need directions to our meeting place, please visit our web site at: http://www.bnug.org/ The Greater Boston Network Users Group is a 501c(3) non profit corporation run entirely by volunteers. BNUG is dedicated to helping members understand, use, and manage computer networks, large and small. BNUG has been serving network users and administrators in Boston and New England for over 16 years. Membership is and has always been free. ------------------------------ Organization: Robert Bonomi Consulting Subject: Re: Pennsylvania Railroad's Crew Communication System? From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:36:04 +0000 TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response in article : > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: FYI, anyone interested, for many years, > the Chicago Transit Authority handled their train to control tower > commuications using 'telephones' which transmitted using the third rail > of electrical power (I think third rail is 440 volts DC). I don't know > if they still do, or not. PAT] It's all done on UHF now. Motorola handi-talkies on the belt, with the speaker-mike-antenna clipped at the shoulder, just like the cops use. The change-over was 10-15 years ago. ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock) Subject: Re: Pennsylvania Railroad's Crew Communication System? Date: 4 Oct 2004 18:43:23 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Howard S. Wharton wrote > It operated on low band VHF and operated by air core transformer > coupling rather then radiation. Could someone elaborate what "air core transformer coupling" is and how it differs from normal radio? > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: FYI, anyone interested, for many years, > the Chicago Transit Authority handled their train to control tower > commuications using 'telephones' which transmitted using the third rail > of electrical power (I think third rail is 440 volts DC). I don't know > if they still do, or not. PAT] Rapid transit systems typically use 600 volts DC and I'm pretty sure the CTA did as well. The CTA was unusual in that some of its L cars had trolley poles on some branches (Skokie, Evanston?) though they're converting to all third rail. While I'm not familiar with the CTA communiation system, I suspect it used the same basic principle "closed circuit" that the PRR did. The CTA used the third rail as a conductor for a carrier frequency, sort of like how some college radio stations use building wiring as antenna. Someone can explain this better. The CTA was also unusual in that many of its lines did not have any signal protection -- the motorman just made sure he could stop short before the next train. Over the years signals were added. Despite the presence of signals and safety auto-train stop, a train ran a signal and hit the next train, causing them to fall off the L in a devastating wreck. Apparently the motorman overrode the auto stop signal _and_ applied power for some unknown reason. Other traditional subway-el lines use a "trip stop" which is a little arm that sticks up next to the tracks. If a train runs a red signal, the arm catches a lever on the train cutting propulsion and applying emergency brakes. This is an old system but has worked extremely well over the years. Stops are also used as speed controls, keeping a signal at red for a preset time to ensure a train isn't going too fast. The signals also test for a broken rail. These old relay operated system are extremely safe--they are designed to be fail safe so that any component failure results in a stop. Even the trip arms are spring mounted so they spring upward but need power to hold them down. The disadvtg of the relay systems is that they are expensive and labor intensive to maintain. An ice storm is rough on them causing lots of false red signals, and trains must creep along to be sure they don't hit anything or a broken rail. The early computer systems, such as BART discussed elsewhere, had lots of problems. Finally computers are reliable enough to operate safely in the rugged railroad world and newer technologies are coming out. The industry trade magazine "Railway Age" used to be full of hardware articles and ads; now it has lots of software articles and ads. Times change. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I do not know what CTA is doing now, but when they ran with a combination of third-rail (most of the system) and catenary (or overhead) wires (the Evanston branch and the Skokie branch) the trains would pause just north (Evanston) of Howard Street (or northwest of Howard on the Skokie line) and while one of the two persons on duty left the train to raise (lower) the catenary the other person on the train would announce the fare differential and go passenger by passenger to collect the five cents due to continue the trip. If the passenger had paid the full fare upon first boarding the train, he would have a slip of paper called 'receipt for fare paid' and he would hold it in the air as the collector came around, otherwise he was expected to produce the five cents to give the collector. By the time the collector had worked his way through the entire train, the other guy had the catenary up or down and they were ready to continue the trip. The overhead wire portion of the trip came from prior to CTA taking over that section of the track, which they had inherited from the North Shore Railroad. North Shore, although it did travel all the way to downtown Chicago, only owned the tracks (or right of way) from Wilson Avenue north. South of Wilson Avenue, the right of way was owned by Chicago Rapid Transit Company. Although CTA mostly used third-rail power, there were large areas on the west/northwest side where the trains ran at ground level, and crossed streets with gates and flashing lights, etc. Third-rail had to be stopped at the street crossings; trains were expected to pick up speed as necessary, then slow down and coast across the places where there was no third-rail. Ordinarily, at least *some part* of the train (first or last car of several cars) would be in contact with third-rail somewhere until the train got past the street cross- ing and could be *entirely* once again on third rail. Periodically, the entire train would be out of contact with third rail if the motorman had incorrectly set his speed. The train would come to a complete halt in a station and (for lack of third rail contact could not be started back up. The conductor had to get off the train and take an insulated stick (essentially a pole that otherwise was used to restablish the catenary) and touch it against the third rail next to the car closest to the third rail, then the motorman would pull the train forward a couple feet as needed to establish contact with third rail again, wait for the conductor to get back on and then leave the station. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Nick Landsberg Reply-To: SPAMhukolautTRAP@SPAMattTRAP.net Subject: Re: Cascading Hubs (was Re: Voicepulse Disconnects Computers) Organization: AT&T Worldnet Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 01:39:55 GMT Gordon S. Hlavenka wrote: >> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Does anyone know how to patch two >> routers together if four holes is not enough? Or is that even >> possible? PAT] > You don't need two routers, all you need is one router plus a hub or > switch. Plug one of the four "holes" in the router into one of the > holes on the hub, then plug additional devices in the other holes. > Read the little booklet that comes with the hub as there are some > caveats about which holes you should use ("uplink," for instance) and > these may vary somewhat depending on whose hub you buy. There are also > limits on how deep you can cascade hubs. > Note that most routers incorporate "switches" which are different. > You can cascade switches without getting into trouble, although > latency accumulates as you stack them deeper. In a SOHO environment > you won't have anything to worry about, though. > A hub works at the most basic level of connection (OSI layer 1) and so > it is fast but usually less efficient. A hub takes any data received > on any port and immediately transmits it to all ports. Whereas a > switch operates on a higher level (OSI layer 2 or 3) and examines the > data passing through it. Switches connect ports on-the-fly based on > MAC or IP addresses, and so they can allow much more efficient use of > your LAN wiring. But since they have to look at every packet to see > where it goes, they can't transmit the packet until they've received > and parsed a good chunk of it -- thus the latency. Gamers generally > prefer hubs (better ping times). Yeah, what he said! :) I have my primary machine plugged into the router and the other machines plugged into a hub which is plugged into the router. These others don't do much internet duty (a couple of old iMacs and an ancient Win95 box). I got the hub back about 5-6 years ago to wire up two of the Mac's and the Win95 box together, and, as I recall, it was about 40 USD back then. If you are patient, you can shop around on the internet to see who's having the latest sale and get a really good price, Pat. > Gordon S. Hlavenka http://www.crashelectronics.com > "If we imagined he could _find_ the car, > we could pretend it might be fixed." - Calvin "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious" - A. Bloch ------------------------------ Date: 5 Oct 2004 02:14:12 -0000 From: John Levine Subject: Re: Adding Ports to a Router Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Does anyone know how to patch two > routers together if four holes is not enough? Or is that even > possible? PAT] To add more ports you don't need another router, you need a hub or a switch. They're also cheap and available at the same place you get routers. They come in sizes anywhere from 4 to 16 ports. Switches have more total throughput than hubs but for your purposes the difference is unlikely to matter. Plug a short ethernet cable from one of the ports on the router into the "uplink" port on the hub or switch and you're all set. R's, John ------------------------------ From: Isaiah Beard Subject: Re: Wrong Address For 911 Caller a Tragic Ordeal Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:20:44 -0400 Tony P. wrote: > Suction cup mounted antenna in the nearest southwest facing > window. Put solar cells on the thing to keep it charged and hell, use > bluetooth or 802.11 for it to transmit it's location. > Not hard at all. I guess "hard" and "practical" don't go hand in hand. Not every office has a southwest facing window ... some larger office buildings have interior offices and cubicle areas with no nearby windows at all. And quite a few people will migrate from one location to another, taking the VoIP phone with them (part of the allure of VoIP is that the phone will work anywhere it can get internet connectivity of a decent speed). Will the average end user want to dismantle and relocate a GPS unit with the phone? Dave VanHorn wrote: > Given that houses don't often move, why not go with a fixed IP, and > tie the IP to the address (as it probably already is, in the billing > records). I'd have to say this is going to be unlikely for a number of reasons. Some broadband providers like the idea of being able to recycle unused IP addresses on short notice (DSL with PPPoE is a notorious example). And some carriers, such as Patriot Media, decided to build out their networks the quick-and-dirty way, using what amounts to NAT gateways for streets and whole city blocks and allocating private address space within that subnet. It also runs counter to current trends, where even standard phone numbers are starting to get divorced from their geographical regions. The New York Times did a piece on this recently: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/01/nyregion/01code.html?oref=login E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply. ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) Email <==> FTP: telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system for archives files. You can get desired files in email. ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V23 #470 ******************************